1
|
Liu Q, Li M, Gao Y, Jiang T, Han B, Zhao G, Lin C, Lau WY, Zhao Z, Liu R. Effect of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy on postoperative length of hospital stay and complications for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 9:428-437. [PMID: 38428441 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(24)00005-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The flexibility of the robotic system in resection and reconstruction provides potential benefits in pancreaticoduodenectomy. Increasingly, robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported with favourable outcomes, but high-level evidence is still scarce. We aimed to compare the short-term postoperative outcomes of RPD with those of open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD), and hypothesised that postoperative length of hospital stay would be shorter after RPD than after OPD. METHODS This multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted at three high-volume hospitals in China. Patients were considered for participation in this trial if they were aged 18-75 years, had a resectable benign, premalignant, or malignant tumour in the pancreatic head or periampullary region; and were suitable for both RPD and OPD. Patients with distant metastases were excluded. Block randomisation was done with random block sizes of four, stratified by centre. Allocation was concealed via individual, sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to the RPD group or the OPD group in a 1:1 ratio by a masked research assistant. Surgeons and patients were not masked to trial group, but data collectors, postoperative outcome assessors, and data analysts were. All patients underwent RPD or OPD according to previously reported techniques. Participating surgeons had surpassed the learning curves of at least 40 RPD and 60 OPD procedures. The primary outcome was postoperative length of hospital stay, which was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200056809) and is complete. FINDINGS Between March 5 and Dec 20, 2022, 292 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 164 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the RPD group (n=82) or the OPD group (n=82). 161 patients who underwent surgical resection were included in the mITT analysis (81 in the RPD group and 80 in the OPD group). 94 (58%) participants were male and 67 (42%) were female. Postoperative length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RPD group than in the OPD group (median 11·0 days [IQR 9·0 to 19·5] vs 13·5 days [11·5 to 18·0]; median difference -2·0 [95% CI -4·0 to 0·0]; p=0·029). During a follow-up period of 90 days, six (7%) of 81 patients in the RPD group and five (6%) of 80 patients in the OPD group required readmission. Reasons for readmission were intra-abdominal haemorrhage (one in each group), vomiting (two in the RPD group and one in the OPD group), electrolyte disturbance (one in each group), and fever (two in each group). There were two (1%) in-hospital deaths within 90 days of surgery, one in each group. The postoperative 90-day mortality rate (difference -0·02% [-5·6 to 5·5]; p=1·00) and the incidence of severe complications (ie, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3; difference -1·5% [-14·5 to 11·4]; p=0·82) were similar between the two groups. INTERPRETATION For surgeons who had passed the learning curve, RPD was safe and feasible with the advantage of shorter postoperative length of hospital stay than OPD. Future research should focus on the medium-term and long-term outcomes between RPD and OPD. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qu Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China; Department of Organ Transplantation, Third Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Mengyang Li
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanxing Gao
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Jiang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Bing Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Guodong Zhao
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Chao Lin
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dal-Ré R, Banzi R, Cristea IA, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Hemkens LG, Janiaud P, Jansen MS, Naudet F, Rosendaal FR. Using the phases of clinical development of medicines to describe clinical trials assessing other interventions is widespread but not useful. J Clin Epidemiol 2023; 161:157-163. [PMID: 37517503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Dal-Ré
- Epidemiology Unit, Health Research Institute-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Rita Banzi
- Center for Health Regulatory Policies, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri - IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Ioana A Cristea
- Department of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lars G Hemkens
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; Meta-Research Innovation Center Berlin (METRIC-B), Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Perrine Janiaud
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel and University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Marieke S Jansen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Florian Naudet
- Univ Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, Centre d'investigation clinique de Rennes (CIC1414), Service de pharmacologie clinique, Institut de recherche en santé, environnement et travail (Irset), UMR S 1085, EHESP, Rennes, France
| | - Frits R Rosendaal
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amonoo HL, Lam JA, Daskalakis E, Deary EC, Celano C, Onyeaka HK, Newcomb R, Barata A, Horick N, Cutler C, Pirl WF, Lee SJ, Huffman JC, El-Jawahri A. Positive Psychological Well-Being in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Survivors. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:583.e1-583.e9. [PMID: 37442349 PMCID: PMC10529897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Positive thoughts and emotions contribute to overall psychological health in diverse medical populations, including patients undergoing HSCT. However, few studies have described positive psychological well-being (eg, optimism, gratitude, flourishing) in patients undergoing HSCT using well-established, validated patient-reported outcome measures. We conducted cross-sectional secondary analyses of baseline data in 156 patients at 100 days post-HSCT enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a psychological intervention (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05147311) and a prospective study assessing medication adherence at a tertiary care academic cancer center from September 2021 to December 2022. We used descriptive statistics to outline participant reports of positive psychological well-being (PPWB) using validated measures for optimism, gratitude, positive affect, life satisfaction, and flourishing. The participants had a mean age of 57.4 ± 13.1 years, and 51% were male (n = 79). Many, but not all, participants reported high levels of PPWB (ie, optimism, gratitude, positive affect, life satisfaction, and flourishing), defined as agreement with items on a given PPWB measure. For example, for optimism, 29% of participants did not agree that "overall, I expect more good things to happen to me than bad." Aside from life satisfaction, mean PPWB scores were higher in the HSCT population than in other illness populations. Although many patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing HSCT report high levels of PPWB, a substantial minority of patients reported low PPWB (i.e., no agreement with items on a given PPWB measure). Because PPWB is associated with important clinical outcomes in medical populations, further research should determine whether an intervention to promote PPWB can improve quality of life in HSCT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermioni L Amonoo
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jeffrey A Lam
- Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| | | | - Emma C Deary
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher Celano
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Henry K Onyeaka
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard Newcomb
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Anna Barata
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nora Horick
- Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Mass General Hospital Biostatistics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Corey Cutler
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - William F Pirl
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephanie J Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeff C Huffman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Mass General Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harwood RH, Goldberg SE, Brand A, van Der Wardt V, Booth V, Di Lorito C, Hoare Z, Hancox J, Bajwa R, Burgon C, Howe L, Cowley A, Bramley T, Long A, Lock J, Tucker R, Adams EJ, O'Brien R, Kearney F, Kowalewska K, Godfrey M, Dunlop M, Junaid K, Thacker S, Duff C, Welsh T, Haddon-Silver A, Gladman J, Logan P, Pollock K, Vedhara K, Hood V, Das Nair R, Smith H, Tudor-Edwards R, Hartfiel N, Ezeofor V, Vickers R, Orrell M, Masud T. Promoting Activity, Independence, and Stability in Early Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2023; 382:e074787. [PMID: 37643788 PMCID: PMC10463053 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness of an exercise and functional activity therapy intervention in adults with early dementia or mild cognitive impairment compared with usual care. DESIGN Randomised controlled trial. SETTING Participants' homes and communities at five sites in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS 365 adults with early dementia or mild cognitive impairment who were living at home, and family members or carers. INTERVENTION The intervention, Promoting activity, Independence, and Stability in Early Dementia and mild cognitive impairment (PrAISED), was a specially designed, dementia specific, rehabilitation programme focusing on strength, balance, physical activity, and performance of activities of daily living, which was tailored and progressive and addressed risk and the psychological needs of people with dementia. Up to 50 therapy sessions were provided over 12 months. The control group received usual care plus a falls risk assessment. Procedures were adapted during the covid-19 pandemic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was score on the carer (informant) reported disability assessment for dementia scale 12 months after randomisation. Secondary outcomes were self-reported activities of daily living, physical activity, quality of life, balance, functional mobility, fear of falling, frailty, cognition, mood, carer strain, service use at 12 months, and falls between months 4 and 15. RESULTS 365 patient participants were randomised, 183 to intervention and 182 to control. The median age of participants was 80 years (range 65-95), median Montreal cognitive assessment score was 20 out of 30 (range 13-26), and 58% (n=210) were men. Intervention participants received a median of 31 therapy sessions (interquartile range 22-40) and reported completing a mean 121 minutes of PrAISED exercise each week. Primary outcome data were available for 149 intervention and 141 control participants. Scores on the disability assessment for dementia scale did not differ between groups: adjusted mean difference -1.3, 95% confidence interval -5.2 to 2.6; Cohen's d effect size -0.06, 95% confidence interval -0.26 to 0.15; P=0.51). Upper 95% confidence intervals excluded small to moderate effects on any of the range of outcome measures. Between months 4 and 15 the intervention group experienced 79 falls and the control group 200 falls (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 1.3; P=0.3). CONCLUSION The intensive PrAISED programme of exercise and functional activity training did not improve activities of daily living, physical activity, or quality of life; reduce falls; or improve any other secondary health status outcomes, despite good uptake. Future research should consider alternative approaches to maintaining ability and wellbeing in people with dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15320670.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rowan H Harwood
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sarah E Goldberg
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Andrew Brand
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Veronika van Der Wardt
- Department of General, Preventative and Rehabilitation Medicine, Philipps-Universität Marburg 35032 Marburg, Germany
| | - Vicky Booth
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Claudio Di Lorito
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Zoe Hoare
- North Wales Organisation for Randomised Trials in Health, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Jennie Hancox
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Rupinder Bajwa
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Clare Burgon
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Louise Howe
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Alison Cowley
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Trevor Bramley
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Annabelle Long
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Juliette Lock
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rachael Tucker
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Emma J Adams
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Rebecca O'Brien
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Fiona Kearney
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Katarzyna Kowalewska
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Kehinde Junaid
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Highbury Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - Simon Thacker
- Centre for Research and Development, Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Kingsway Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Carol Duff
- Lincolnshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Lincoln, UK
| | - Tomas Welsh
- The RICE Centre, Research Institute for the Care of Older People, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK
| | - Annette Haddon-Silver
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Research and Development, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - John Gladman
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Pip Logan
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2HA, UK
| | - Kavita Vedhara
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Lifespan and Population Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Victoria Hood
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Roshan Das Nair
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
- SINTEF, Torgarden, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Helen Smith
- Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Lings Bar Hospital, Gamston, Nottingham, UK
| | - Rhiannon Tudor-Edwards
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Ned Hartfiel
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Victory Ezeofor
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, College of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, UK
| | - Robert Vickers
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - Martin Orrell
- Mental Health Services for Older People, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Highbury Hospital, Nottingham, UK
- Institute for Mental Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tahir Masud
- Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kudlicka A, Martyr A, Bahar-Fuchs A, Sabates J, Woods B, Clare L. Cognitive rehabilitation for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 6:CD013388. [PMID: 37389428 PMCID: PMC10310315 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013388.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive impairments affect functional ability in people with dementia. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) is a personalised, solution-focused approach that aims to enable people with mild-to-moderate dementia to manage everyday activities and maintain as much independence as possible. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects of CR on everyday functioning and other outcomes for people with mild-to-moderate dementia, and on outcomes for care partners. To identify and explore factors that may be associated with the efficacy of CR. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group Specialised Register, which contains records from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, LILACS, and other clinical trial databases, and grey literature sources. The most recent search was completed on 19 October 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing CR with control conditions and reporting relevant outcomes for the person with dementia and/or the care partner. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We extracted relevant data from published manuscripts and contacted trial authors if necessary. Within each of the comparisons, we pooled data for each outcome of interest and conducted inverse-variance, random-effects meta-analyses. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADEpro GDT. MAIN RESULTS We identified six eligible RCTs published in English between 2010 and 2022, which together included 1702 participants. The mean age of participants ranged from 76 to 80 and the proportion of male participants was between 29.4% and 79.3%. Most participants, in the studies where the type of dementia was reported, had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD; n = 1002, 58.9% of the whole sample, 81.2% of the participants for whom the specific diagnosis was reported). Risk of bias in the individual studies was relatively low. The exception was a high risk of bias in relation to blinding of participants and practitioners, which is not usually feasible with psychosocial interventions. Our primary outcome of everyday functioning was operationalised in the included studies as goal attainment in relation to activities targeted in the intervention. For our main comparison of CR with usual care, we pooled data for goal attainment evaluated from three perspectives (self-rating of performance, informant rating of performance, and self-rating of satisfaction with performance) at end of treatment and at medium-term follow-up (3 to 12 months). We could also pool data at these time points for 20 and 19 secondary outcomes respectively. The review findings were strongly driven by one large, high-quality RCT. We found high-certainty evidence of large positive effects of CR on all three primary outcome perspectives at the end of treatment: participant self-ratings of goal attainment (standardised mean difference (SMD) 1.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 1.66; I2 = 0%; 3 RCTs, 501 participants), informant ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.61, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.21; I2 = 41%; 3 RCTs, 476 participants), and self-ratings of satisfaction with goal attainment (SMD 1.31, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.54; I2 = 5%; 3 RCTs, 501 participants), relative to an inactive control condition. At medium-term follow-up, we found high-certainty evidence showing a large positive effect of CR on all three primary outcome perspectives: participant self-ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.46, 95% CI 1.25 to 1.68; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 432 participants), informant ratings of goal attainment (SMD 1.25, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.72; I2 = 29%; 3 RCTs, 446 participants), and self-ratings of satisfaction with goal attainment (SMD 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.66; I2 = 28%; 2 RCTs, 432 participants), relative to an inactive control condition. For participants at the end of treatment we found high-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on self-efficacy (2 RCTs, 456 participants) and immediate recall (2 RCTs, 459 participants). For participants at medium-term follow-up we found moderate-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on auditory selective attention (2 RCTs, 386 participants), and a small negative effect on general functional ability (3 RCTs, 673 participants), and we found low-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on sustained attention (2 RCTs, 413 participants), and a small negative effect on memory (2 RCTs, 51 participants) and anxiety (3 RCTs, 455 participants). We found moderate- and low-certainty evidence indicating that at the end of treatment CR had negligible effects on participant anxiety, quality of life, sustained attention, memory, delayed recall, and general functional ability, and at medium-term follow-up on participant self-efficacy, depression, quality of life, immediate recall, and verbal fluency. For care partners at the end of treatment we found low-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on environmental aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 465 care partners), and small negative effects of CR on level of depression (2 RCTs, 32 care partners) and on psychological wellbeing (2 RCTs, 388 care partners). For care partners at medium-term follow-up we found high-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect of CR on social aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 436 care partners) and moderate-certainty evidence showing a small positive effect on psychological aspects of quality of life (3 RCTs, 437 care partners). We found moderate- and low-certainty evidence at the end of treatment that CR had negligible effects on care partners' physical health, psychological and social aspects of quality of life, and stress, and at medium-term follow-up for the physical health aspect of care partners' quality of life and psychological wellbeing. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS CR is helpful in enabling people with mild or moderate dementia to improve their ability to manage the everyday activities targeted in the intervention. Confidence in these findings could be strengthened if more high-quality studies contributed to the observed effects. The available evidence suggests that CR can form a valuable part of a clinical toolkit to assist people with dementia in overcoming some of the everyday barriers imposed by cognitive and functional difficulties. Future research, including process evaluation studies, could help identify avenues to maximise CR effects and achieve wider impacts on functional ability and wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alex Bahar-Fuchs
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Julieta Sabates
- Academic Unit for Psychiatry of Old Age, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bob Woods
- Dementia Services Development Centre Wales, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Linda Clare
- University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
- NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moniz-Cook E, Mountain G. The memory clinic and psychosocial intervention: Translating past promise into current practices. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2023; 4:1052244. [PMID: 37214129 PMCID: PMC10192709 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1052244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Disproportionate negative effects since the pandemic have amplified the already limited post-diagnostic support for older people with dementia. This paper summarizes an exploratory randomized controlled study of a proactive family-based intervention compared with "usual" post-diagnostic dementia care. Memory clinic practitioners collaborated with the family doctor (GP) to coordinate this. At 12-month follow-up, positive effects on mood, behavior, carer coping and maintenance of care at home were found. Current approaches to deliver post-diagnostic support in primary care may require rethinking since (i) GP workloads have increased with low numbers of GPs per head of population in parts of England; and (ii) unlike many other long-term conditions, ongoing stigma, fear and uncertainty associated with dementia adds to the huge complexity of timely care provision. There is a case for return to a "one-stop facility", with a single pathway of continuing multidisciplinary coordinated care for older people with dementia and families. Future longitudinal research could compare structured post-diagnostic psychosocial intervention coordinated by skilled practitioners in a single locality memory service "hub", against other approaches such support organized mostly within primary care. Dementia-specific instruments for outcome measurement are available for use in routine practice, and should be included in such comparative studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esme Moniz-Cook
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Gail Mountain
- Centre for Applied Dementia Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smith SK, Wolverson EL, Mountain GA. What is intended by the term “participation” and what does it mean to people living with dementia? A conceptual overview and directions for future research. FRONTIERS IN REHABILITATION SCIENCES 2022; 3:952722. [PMID: 36189033 PMCID: PMC9397697 DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.952722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Policy continues to emphasise the importance of wellbeing in dementia. However, there is a vital need for psychosocial interventions that can promote positive outcomes to enhance “living well with dementia”. Our developing understanding of what people living with dementia report as being important to them, has resulted in new interpretations of what constitutes wellbeing including constructs such as “growth”, “purpose” and “participation”. These exciting and important constructs are not currently captured by outcome measures within dementia research. This limits our understanding of the value of psychosocial interventions. This paper explores the concept of participation and how continued participation in social life can make a difference to the rights of people living with dementia as citizens. We will firstly consider why participation is important for how we might measure outcomes in dementia research and care. Secondly, we will explore how we might measure participation. Finally, we will consider the value of participation as a psychosocial outcome in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Kate Smith
- Health, Wellbeing & Lifesciences, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom
- Correspondence: Sarah Kate Smith
| | - Emma Louise Wolverson
- Health Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
- Clinical Psychology for Older People, Humber Teaching NHS Foundation, Hull, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kales HC. Seeing the forest but missing some important trees. THE LANCET. HEALTHY LONGEVITY 2022; 3:e225-e226. [DOI: 10.1016/s2666-7568(22)00077-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
|