Integrated Geriatric Assessment and Treatment Effectiveness (INTEGERATE) in older people with cancer starting systemic anticancer treatment in Australia: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Clinical Pharmacist and Clinical Nurse Specialist led medicine optimisation and medication adherence via eArly identifiCation advanCed gEriatric aSsesSment (ACCESS) tool in Senior Adult Oncology Programme (SAOP)

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive geriatric assessment evaluates key health domains for older adults, focusing on medicine optimisation and medication adherence to improve tolerability and quality of life for older adults on systematic anticancer therapy. The Royal Marsden (RM) Senior Adult Oncology Programme (SAOP) provides multidisciplinary geriatric assessment and interventions for patients ≥ 70 undergoing systematic anticancer therapy.

AIM

We designed an ACCESS (eArly identifiCation advanCed gEriatric aSsesSment) tool to enhance efficiency of SAOP outpatient clinics by facilitating geriatric assessment including medications, nutrition, social support, mood, and functional assessments.

SETTING

SAOP at RM NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

DEVELOPMENT

Developed by SAOP pharmacist and clinical nurse specialist with input from SAOP multidisciplinary team, the ACCESS tool includes medication review patient counselling deprescribing, and comorbidity management, aligning with the Royal Pharmaceutical Society Advanced Pharmacy Framework.

IMPLEMENTATION

From January to December 2022, ACCESS was implemented in three steps: screening with Senior Adult Oncology Programme v 3 (SAOP3) questionnaire, remote consultation based on results, and medication review and patient counselling for complex medication needs, enhancing patient engagement and treatment understanding.

EVALUATION

The practice was audited through the implementation process. Quantitative data from staff and 100 patients who were users of the SAOP service and ACCESS tool revealed higher medication adherence, improved identification of inappropriate medications, and enhanced confidence in managing complex geriatric oncology cases.

CONCLUSION

The ACCESS tool, led by clinical pharmacist and clinical nurse specialist has improved outpatient clinic efficiency, patient satisfaction, and healthcare coordination. It allows personalised follow-up plans for older adults with complex health issues on anticancer therapy. Regular multidisciplinary team meetings and digital health records enhance care coordination and decision-making for older adults with cancer.

AGITG MONARCC: A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Panitumumab Monotherapy and Panitumumab Plus 5-Fluorouracil as First-Line Therapy for Older Patients With RAS and BRAF Wild Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. A Study by the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG)

BACKGROUND

Panitumumab (pan) plus chemotherapy is a preferred first-line therapy for unresectable RAS and BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Older patients may not be suitable for combination regimens. We investigated 2 lower intensity pan-containing regimens.

METHODS

Prospective, noncomparative, randomized (1:1) phase 2 study of pan alone (Arm A) or pan plus FU (Arm B). Previously untreated mCRC were ≥70 years; RAS/BRAF wild type.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included: overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), feasibility of geriatric assessments and overall treatment utility (OTU)-a composite measure based on radiological response, clinical progress, toxicity and patient-reported treatment worth. Planned sample size was 40 patients per arm.

RESULTS

36 patients (Arm A n = 19, Arm B n = 17) were randomized between June 2018 and June 2021. Median age was 79 and 80 years respectively. 6-month PFS 63% (95% CI 38%-80%) arm A 82% (95%CI 55%-94%) Arm B. Median OS 21 months Arm A (95%CI 13-31) 28 (95%CI 14-39) months Arm B. RR 47% and 65% Arms A and B respectively. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were completed in >80% of patients. At week 16, OTU was categorized as good in 92% (Arm A) and 90% (Arm B). No unexpected adverse events were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Six-month PFS in both arms was consistent with that achieved with FU/bev, whilst the rate was numerically higher for Arm B. Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessments were feasible and OTU was high. Both treatment arms might be suitable in appropriately selected patients.

Geriatric assessment in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology narrative review

The therapeutic landscape of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in older adults has been transformed by the advent of targeted therapies, including venetoclax (a B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor), gilteritinib (a FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitor), ivosidenib, and enasidenib (isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2 inhibitors). These agents, in combination with hypomethylating agents, have significantly improved outcomes among patients aged 60 years and older, however, overall survival remains very poor. Hence, the management of AML in this population requires a nuanced approach to balance overall survival, treatment-related toxicities, quality of life, and the preservation of functional independence. In recent years, geriatric assessment (GA) has emerged as a critical strategy to identify vulnerabilities that may not be captured in routine oncology evaluations. This assessment helps guide tailored interventions to optimize the fitness of older adults, allowing for better risk stratification and thereby informing treatment plans. This review discusses available evidence for each domain within the GA, feasibility of GA in clinical trials, and gaps in knowledge and future directions to fill those gaps.

Geriatric Assessment and Management, Prehabilitation and Rehabilitation for Older Aldults with Non-Colorectal Digestive Cancers

BACKGROUND

The incidence of cancer in older patients is high, reaching 2.3 million world-wide in 2018 for patients aged over 80. Because the characteristics of this population make therapeutic choices difficult, co-management between geriatricians and other cancer specialists has gradually become essential.

METHODS

This narrative review aims to synthesize current data on the contribution of geriatric assessment in the management of elderly patients with non-colorectal digestive cancers. Oncogeriatric assessment is multi-domain, including the evaluation of co-morbidities, autonomy, nutrition, cognition, mood, and functional assessment.

RESULTS

Oncogeriatric parameters are predictive of mortality and adverse events. In the peri-operative phase of non-colorectal digestive cancer surgical management, geriatric management can assist in the decision-making process, identify frailties, and arrange a specific and personalized trimodal preoperative rehabilitation program, including nutritional management, adapted physical activity, and psychological care. Its aim is to limit the risks of confusion and of decompensation of comorbidities, mainly cardio-respiratory, which is associated with the highest morbidity in biliary-pancreatic surgery for older adults, facilitate recovery of previous autonomy when possible, and shorten hospital stay. For metastatic cancers, or during multimodal management, such as peri-operative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancers or pre-operative radio-chemotherapy for oesophageal or rectal cancers, specific assessment of the tolerance of chemotherapy is necessary. Neuropathic toxicity and chemobrain have a greater impact on elderly patients, with an increased loss of autonomy. Joint geriatric management can reduce the rate of grade 3-5 adverse effects of chemotherapy in particular and improve quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-management between geriatricians and other specialties should be encouraged wherever possible.

Australian healthcare professionals' experiences and perception of management of older adults with cancer: A qualitative study

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer make up a large proportion of cancer diagnoses in Australia. Multimorbidity and aging-related vulnerabilities can make cancer treatment and management challenging. There are limited qualitative studies exploring current practice of care and use of geriatric assessments (GAs) in Australia. This study aimed to qualitatively explore Australian healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences of treatment decision-making in relation to older adults with cancer and perceptions of the role of GAs in cancer care in Australia to identify potential barriers to implementation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Australian HCPs providing care for older adults with cancer completed a short online survey and participated in a semi-structured telephone interview exploring their perceptions and experiences of treatment decision-making, and management of older adults with cancer. Purposive sampling ensured representation across disciplines. Thematic analysis using a framework approach identified key themes.

RESULTS

Thirty-one HCPs (n = 19 medical HCPs, n = 7 cancer nurses, n = 5 allied HCPs) completed the online questionnaire. Most participants rated assessment of geriatric domains to be important/very important when considering treatment decisions, however there was variability in perceived importance for assessing objective measures of function and mobility. Of the 31 participants that completed the questionnaire, 29 participated in a semi-structured telephone interview. Qualitative analysis of interviews revealed four main themes: (1) Who do we consider older? Chronological vs. functional age, (2) Clinical management of older adults - theory vs. practice, (3) Is there value in geriatric assessments? (4) Factors that impact GA implementation, and one overarching theme (5) Treatment decision-making for older adults with cancer.

DISCUSSION

This study provides insight into current practice of care for older adults with cancer and the barriers and facilitators to GA implementation within Australian cancer services. Health economic research demonstrating cost-effectiveness of GAs to facilitate system-level change is required. There is also need for further education and training for Australian HCPs on geriatric principles and assessments to improve management for older adults with cancer.

Role of Geriatric Assessment in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant and Cellular Therapies

OPINION STATEMENT

Hematological malignancies are common among older adults, a group that faces unique challenges in treatment. While hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T therapy offer promising, potentially curative and durable treatment options for older adults with high-risk diseases, their effectiveness can be limited by the individual's overall health and ability to tolerate intensive treatments. Conventional fitness assessments in this population often fall short in addressing the complexities of aging. Conversely, geriatric assessment provides a more comprehensive evaluation of an older adult's health across multiple domains, including physical health, cognitive function, mental health, nutrition, comorbidities, polypharmacy, and social support. This holistic approach helps to better understand the patient's resilience and facilitate timely adjustments to interventions, potentially improving both survival outcomes and quality of life. This review aims to explore the current evidence on integrating geriatric assessments into the optimization of older patients for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and CAR-T therapy, along with various care models, their potential, and future directions.

Understanding frailty and the role of patient-centered care for older adults with gynecologic cancer

The number of older adults with cancer will significantly grow in the coming decades. 45 % of older adults with gynecologic cancer are estimated to be affected by frailty. Frailty is a state of reduced physiologic reserve and decreased resiliency resulting in increased vulnerability to stressors. Importantly, frailty can exist in conjunction, but is not synonymous, with chronological age and older adults can be a heterogenous population. Routine assessment of frailty can help providers prevent both over- and under-treatment. The purpose of this review to describe the current state of literature on frailty as it relates to gynecologic cancer and draw from other literature including geriatrics, medical oncology, and surgery to suggest approaches to care. Frail patients have increased rates of surgical morbidity and mortality, higher toxicity to systemic therapy, and lower overall survival. Principles of the 5Ms (mobility, multi-complexity, mind, medications, and matters most) can be used in the clinic to guide care for older vulnerable (at risk) or frail adults. Surgical and medical oncology literature consistently indicates improved outcomes when multi-disciplinary approaches are used with routine frailty assessment. Future work is urgently needed to add validated geriatric measurements and outcomes into therapeutic trials and evaluate the impact of treatment choices on outcomes important to older adults such as functional recovery.

What are the determinants of functional decline in older adults with cancer? Results from the INCAPAC study

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer are exposed to greater difficulties in carrying out their daily activities due to cancer itself, its treatment, or both. The aim of this study was to describe functional decline after cancer diagnosis and to investigate the determinants of this decline among older individuals with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Gironde cancer registries, older subjects (≥65 years) with a diagnosis of cancer between 2005 and 2018 were identified in three prospective cohorts on aging. Functional decline was defined as an increase of 1 point for Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 2 points for Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), and 3 points for the overall score (ADL + IADL) between cancer pre- and post-diagnosis visits. Logistic regression models were used to identify determinants of functional decline among older subjects who underwent a post-diagnostic assessment. Additionally, multinomial logistic regression models were performed to account for individuals who had died prior to the post-diagnostic cancer visit.

RESULTS

A total of 306 individuals followed-up after the cancer diagnosis were included (median age at cancer diagnosis: 83; 44 % female). Older age at cancer, low educational level, impaired initial functional status, and poor five-year cancer-related prognosis were significantly associated with functional decline across all three scores. Multinomial logistic regression analyses (n = 489) yielded similar results, but only cancer-related factors, specifically unfavorable vital prognosis, were associated with higher risk of death.

DISCUSSION

Functional decline in older individuals with cancer is both multifactorial and multidimensional. Further studies are needed to disentangle the effects of cancer and aging.

Application of comprehensive geriatric assessment in oncology nursing: A literature review on optimizing treatment decisions and patient outcomes

With the global population aging, the care of elderly cancer patients has become increasingly complex and significant. Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a multidimensional evaluation tool, has been widely implemented in oncology nursing to enhance the precision of treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes. This review examines the application of CGA in oncology nursing, drawing on literature published between 2010 and 2024 in major databases using keywords such as "Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment" and "Oncology Nursing". It highlights how CGA contributes to optimizing treatment selection, monitoring the treatment process, and improving patients' quality of life and long-term outcomes. CGA provides a comprehensive evaluation of elderly cancer patients, including physical, psychological, and social aspects, enabling the identification of high-risk patients and reducing treatment-related side effects and complications. It also offers a critical foundation for developing personalized care plans. The article discusses various practical examples of CGA implementation across different countries and regions, including multidisciplinary collaborative models in France, the United States, and Australia, demonstrating CGA's flexible application in diverse healthcare settings. Although significant progress has been made in applying CGA in oncology nursing, numerous challenges remain in its implementation, such as resource limitations and insufficient personnel training. Future research will focus on integrating CGA with emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and precision medicine, to further improve the quality of care and treatment outcomes for elderly cancer patients. By summarizing the current status and challenges of CGA in oncology nursing, this review provides guidance for future research and clinical practice, emphasizing the importance of advancing CGA application to meet the growing demands of elderly oncology care.

Does frailty modulate the predictive value of performance status in older adults living with cancer?

Background

Cancer treatments are not a one-size-fits-all approach, treatment options are rarely studied in aging individuals, leading to worse outcomes related to increased vulnerability in this group of patients.

Aims

Since frailty has shown the ability to modify outcomes, our study aims to assess if frailty modifies the association between performance status and days in bed with mortality risk in older adults with cancer.

Methods

Our study is a secondary analysis of the Mexican Health and Aging Study, a cohort with a representative sample of individuals aged 50 years or older, with a baseline assessment in 2001 and follow-up data available for the years 2003, 2012, 2015, 2018 and 2021. We extracted the baseline variables from the main questionnaires, and the next-of-kin questionnaires were employed for information regarding mortality. We used Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier curves for survival analysis.

Results

Our sample was composed of 318 individuals, with a mean age of 68.02 years (± SD 10.78), and 62.57% were women. Cox regression revealed that age was a significant risk factor for mortality in frail patients but not in those with low frailty levels.

Discussion

in settings where access to a geriatric assessment is limited or would significantly delay cancer-specific therapies, assessing frailty might improve the accuracy of those available cancer prognostic tools that might underperform in frail older adults.

Conclusions

Frailty evaluation improves the assessment of older adults living with cancer.

Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men aged above 75 years old. Given their heterogeneity, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology recommends using a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) to adapt anticancer treatment management according to their geriatric status. While the theoretical value of this approach is in no doubt, the impact of the CGA on the final therapeutic decision remains elusive. This study therefore investigated the impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions in older patients diagnosed with prostate cancer and described the factors associated with a change in treatment plan.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included prostate cancer patients who received a CGA prior to a therapeutic decision from January 2012 to December 2022. The CGA included medical, nutritional, cognitive, social, functional and psychological evaluation.

RESULTS

140 patients were included, of whom 57 (40.7%) benefited from a change in their therapeutic plan after CGA, all in favour of a less aggressive treatment. There was no difference in event-free (EFS) or overall survival (OS) between patients with or without a therapeutic modification (HR for OS = 1.12 [0.68;1.84] p = 0.048). Factors associated with a change in treatment plan were a WHO performance status > 1, a high age-adjusted Charlson score, polymedication, an impaired functional independence with the ADL (Activities of Daily Living) scale and a 'frail' or 'vulnerable' geriatric profile according to Balducci's classification.

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive geriatric assessment prior to prostate cancer treatment plan initiation lead to therapeutic de-escalation in 40% of cases of without affecting overall survival or event-free survival. This adaptation offering a more tailored cancer management while preventing functional impact of treatment due to toxicity and improving patient quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered as (number's register: F20240123102237) and MR004 (CNIL number: 23RDUROL01).

Supporting older adults with cancer and their support person through geriatric assessment and remote exercise and education: The SOAR study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Frail older adults receiving cancer treatment are at heightened risk of adverse outcomes. Despite the known benefits of exercise during cancer treatment to improve well-being, few exercise studies focus on frail older adults receiving cancer treatment and their support person. Geriatric assessment (GA) is often recommended prior to the start of treatment for frail adults with cancer, but combining the GA with a planned exercise regimen remains unexplored. This study aims to determine the feasibility and acceptability of implementing geriatric assessment and management (GAM) in combination with virtual chair-based exercise (CBE) and health education for frail older adults with cancer and their support persons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This phase 2 randomized controlled trial will include patients aged 70 years and above with a lung, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary cancer referred for first- or second-line chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy. Patients must be frail (≥3 on the Vulnerable Elders Survey), sedentary on the Godin Leisure Time Activity Questionnaire (<90 min of moderate/intense activity per week), have English proficiency with ability to consent, a physician-estimated life expectancy of at least six months, and deemed safe to exercise. Each older adult will be invited to bring a support person to participate in the study. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to GAM combined with online CBE and health education for 12 weeks or waitlist control. Participating support persons will follow the same intervention group. Primary endpoints for feasibility and acceptability will be recruitment rate, retention, adherence, and data collection. Outcome measures include physical activity, function, fatigability, quality of life, treatment toxicity, and unplanned hospital visits. Outcome measures will be used to obtain estimates of the effect size and feasibility analysis needed for designing a phase 3 study. The study will take place at two hospitals in Toronto, Canada.

DISCUSSION

This study will investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and obtain preliminary estimates of the outcomes of GAM plus CBE and health education in preventing functional decline and improving quality of life in frail older adults receiving cancer treatment and their support persons. The results will help to design a definitive phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Registration Number: NCT05509751).

Describing the outcomes of frail patients undergoing treatment with systemic therapies for acute myeloid leukaemia: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a disease of the older person. Due to the demands of intensive chemotherapy, there is a significant risk of over or undertreatment, leading to either iatrogenic harm or missed windows of opportunity for remission or cure. Better tools to aid clinical decision making and risk stratify patients are needed. We aimed to investigate the association between frailty and the treatment and disease-related outcomes of adults receiving systemic therapy for AML.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases was undertaken for studies assessing frailty (defined as multi-dimensional assessment evaluating two or more geriatric relevant domains or usage of a validated geriatric assessment screening tool) in the setting of adults undergoing systemic therapy for AML.

RESULTS

We identified 6,644 publications, 16 of which met inclusion criteria for extraction. The most commonly described outcomes were overall survival (OS) (n = 12), mortality (n = 8), response rate (n = 6), and high grade toxicity (n = 5). Eleven studies correlated frailty with treatment outcomes: frailty was predictive of lower OS (n = 5), higher mortality (n = 3), and more high grade toxicity (n = 1). OS in particular retained this relationship when controlling for variables such as molecular markers and performance status. Significant heterogeneity in outcome reporting and frailty assessment precluded meta-analysis. Included studies were generally of moderate quality.

DISCUSSION

Frailty was predictive of poorer outcomes in patients with AML distinct from and complimentary to traditional disease prognostic schema. Routine implementation of frailty assessment could represent an important tool to risk stratify patients and improve clinical decision making.

Real-world implementation of geriatric assessment in cancer care among older adults: the role of implementation science frameworks

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The evidence supporting geriatric assessment (GA) in cancer care is well established, and GA is recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and other oncology bodies. However, effective implementation of GA remains inadequate. Using selected papers indexed in Medline from the most recent 18 months to July 2024, including two outstanding interest papers, this review aimed to describe enablers and barriers to GA implementation in oncology and contrasts implementation with and without an implementation science framework. Finally, we make recommendations on applying an implementation science framework to facilitate integrating GA in oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implementation science frameworks have been widely employed in health services research, but their use in geriatric oncology, particularly to guide GA implementation and evaluation, is limited. Lack of time in busy practices coupled with workforce shortages adds to the challenges of GA implementation and adoption. A variety of screening and assessment tools such as the G8, electronic rapid fitness assessment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group are often used in lieu of geriatrician review and to streamline GA. When effectively implemented in oncology, GA informs care and treatment decisions for improved outcomes.

SUMMARY

Despite the benefits for older adults, embedding GA into routine clinical practice is critical yet not common practice. The variety of available GA tools, logistics, and individual beliefs are some of the identified barriers to GA adoption in oncology. Enablers include organization readiness, adaptability, communication, and the use of multidisciplinary teams. Further research is needed to examine how implementation science frameworks could provide guidance and structure for successful GA implementation in oncology.

The pervasive impact of frailty on ovarian cancer care and the role of prehabilitation: Qualitative perspectives of key stakeholders

INTRODUCTION

We performed a qualitative study to explore key stakeholders' perspectives about the impact of frailty on ovarian cancer care and evaluate a candidate prehabilitation intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with patient-caregiver dyads and multi-disciplinary clinicians. Patients were ≥ 50 years of age with a new diagnosis of advanced stage (III/IV) ovarian cancer who received cancer-directed treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery) during the past year and met criteria as pre-frail or frail using the FRAIL scale. We used a semi-structured interview guide to elicit participants' views on frailty, nutrition, physical therapy, and a candidate prehabilitation intervention. We used inductive and deductive approaches to code and analyze interviews and identify emergent themes and patterns.

RESULTS

Ten patients and caregivers (five dyads) and 10 providers were interviewed. We identified four themes: (1) frailty screening is essential to prevent over- and under-treatment, but underused; (2) stakeholders preferred a multidisciplinary approach to providing tailored care for frail patients over a candidate prehabilitation intervention; (3) patient, family caregiver, and clinician stakeholders reported multiple barriers to prehabilitation programs, including concerns about selection bias, and (4) frail patients and family members are vulnerable and require more psychosocial support.

DISCUSSION

We identified significant barriers to prehabilitation interventions for frail patients with ovarian cancer; initiatives to increase frailty screening and provide tailored multi-disciplinary approaches may have a greater impact.

Cancer-specific utility instrument for health economic evaluations: A synopsis of the EORTC QLU-C10D user manual and current validity evidence

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Utility - Core 10 Dimensions (QLU-C10D) adds a preference-based scoring algorithm to the EORTC measurement portfolio. It is built on the most widely used health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure in oncology, the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30 (QLQ-C30), allowing for the calculation of both HRQoL profiles and health utilities. This is an important advancement for integrating cancer-specific values into health economic evaluations and decision making, offering greater content validity and statistical power than some generic measures. This article presents an outline of the EORTC QLU-C10D User Manual to inform health-technology bodies, academic researchers, and industry, on the why and how of using this instrument for utility measurement. It covers basic concepts, proper use of the tool, including administration and scoring. Further, we summarise the presently published valuation studies, country-specific value sets, and body of evidence about psychometric properties. Current methodological questions are discussed, including mapping between utility measures and adaptions of generic measures for use in cancer populations. Taking into account empirical studies on psychometric properties, like content and construct validity, and comparisons with generic measures, we argue that the QLU-C10D is a reliable and valid instrument for cancer populations. Without imposing additional patient and administrative burden it has the potential to support health economic decisions in cancer by providing high-quality cancer-specific utility scores, to complement the more detailed HRQoL information from the QLQ-C30.

Real-World Evidence of Combination Therapy Use in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer in the United States From 2017 to 2023

PURPOSE

Treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved with robust clinical trial evidence on the benefits of combining androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPIs; abiraterone, apalutamide, darolutamide, and enzalutamide) and/or docetaxel (DOC). To understand current treatment approaches in clinical practice, we examined combined therapy for mHSPC in US real-world practice.

METHODS

This retrospective study used administrative claims in the Komodo Research Dataset (January 2016-September 2023). Individuals with mHSPC were identified on the basis of their earliest claim for metastasis on/after prostate cancer diagnosis date without evidence of castration resistance. Index date was the earliest ADT claim after mHSPC. Combination therapy included the addition of ARPI, DOC, or both to ADT within 4 months of index date. Multinomial regression was used to examine factors associated with combination therapy.

RESULTS

Study population consisted of 10,717 individuals, with a median age of 65 years and a majority of de novo mHSPC cases at diagnosis (62%). Overall, 28% received combination therapy with ARPI (18% abiraterone; 10% apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide), 9% with DOC, and 2.5% with ARPI plus DOC. From 2017 to 2023, combined hormonal therapy with ARPI increased from 13% to 47% and with ARPI plus DOC from 0.8% to 15%, whereas use of ADT plus DOC declined from 12% to 3% and ADT alone from 74% to 36%. Key factors associated with combination therapy were younger age, fewer chronic comorbidities, de novo mHSPC, and bone metastases.

CONCLUSION

Although one third of men received ADT alone in 2023, the use of combination hormonal therapy with ARPI and/or DOC increased between 2017 and 2023, highlighting uptake of guideline-recommended treatment, driven by available clinical evidence, disease burden, and tolerability.

Frailty in Older Adults with Prostate Cancer

Older adults with all stages of prostate cancer are prone to developing frailty. These patients should have a frailty assessment and be managed by a multidisciplinary team. Lifestyle measures and tailoring of cancer-related treatment to the patient's fitness level can help in mitigating the adverse effects of frailty.

How I treat older patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

ABSTRACT

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive, yet curable, malignancy, but older patients are at higher risk of relapsed disease because they may not be eligible for full-intensity frontline chemoimmunotherapy or have comorbidities that limit standard treatments. Recent years have brought more treatment options than ever for this patient population, but it remains challenging to determine which can be safely and effectively offered to older patients. Formal determinations of fitness including geriatric assessments remain critical, but there is less guidance on how to best use this tool in the relapsed setting. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy is accessible to older patients, provided they can be supported through the intensive road to this treatment. If relapse occurs despite this or alternative therapies are preferred, many novel therapeutic options and combinations exist with some potential modifications for older adults, such as bispecific antibodies, tafasitamab and lenalidomide, polatuzumab-containing regimens, or loncastuximab tesirine. This article provides a summary of our approach to the management of this diverse population of older patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.

Optimizing individualized therapy decision-making in multiple myeloma (MM): integration and impact of the Revised Myeloma Comorbidity Index in the MM-tumor board

Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a hematological disease predominantly affecting elderly patients. The complexity of current treatment necessitates individualized approaches. Therein, functional assessment (FA) tools, such as the Revised Comorbidity Index (R-MCI) at our University- and Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg, play a crucial role. This study aimed to determine (a) the implementation of the R-MCI in our MM-tumor board (MM-TB), (b) its impact on treatment guidance at baseline and (c) potential changes during follow-up. This exploratory study investigated R-MCI coverage and distribution in a cohort of patients with multiple TB presentations. Among them, a follow-up patient cohort undergoing subsequent MM-therapy was analyzed to determine treatment adjustments and changes in patients' condition measured by R-MCI alterations. During our 3-year assessment period, 565 patients were presented in our MM-TB, totaling 1256 TB-presentations. In the multiple TB presentation cohort, the median number of TB presentations was 3 (range: 2-12). R-MCI scores within the MM-TB were available in 94%, whereas in 6%, the R-MCI had not been integrated. Among these, potential failure to identify the need for treatment modifications was determined. In the follow-up cohort, patient characteristics were typical for referral/university centers. Dose reductions were performed in 55% and were more prevalent among patients with ≥ 4 vs. lesser TB presentations. Most patients (55%) showed a fitness stabilization or improvement via follow-up R-MCI. R-MCI integration in MM-TB exceeded > 90%, indicating its successful integration for treatment support. Our results underscore its value in guiding therapy decisions, providing a comprehensive assessment beyond age considerations.

Predictive ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group chemotherapy toxicity calculator in hematologic malignancy

INTRODUCTION

Chemotherapy toxicity tools are rarely studied in patients with hematologic malignancy (HM). The primary aim of this pilot study was to determine the predictive ability of the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) chemo-toxicity calculator in estimating grade 3-5 toxicity in patients with HM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients 60 years and older with HM were prospectively evaluated using the CARG chemo-toxicity calculator. Discrimination and calibration were checked by applying the published model in our data. Additionally, a full geriatric assessment (GA), the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), and health related quality of life (HRQoL) were captured longitudinally at the start of treatment and at end of study. Secondary aims explored the association of GA metrics with chemo-related toxicities and survival.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-five patients were approached, 118 patients consented, and 97 patients were evaluable. Most patients were newly diagnosed (n = 91). The median CARG score was 9 (range 4-18). The CARG score was not validated in our cohort of older patients with HM, with area under the receiver operation characteristic curve being 0.53 (95 % CI: 0.41-0.65). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for disease type, risk factors associated with grade 3-5 toxicity included living alone (hazard ratio [HR] 4.24, 95 %CI: 2.07-8.68, p < 0.001), increase in body mass index (HR 1.06, 95 %CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.03) and a higher social activities score (HR 1.27, 95 %CI: 1.06-1.51, p = 0.01). In multivariable analysis of overall survival, the only prognostic factor was an objective marker of physical function (SPPB score HR = 0.85, 95 %CI:0.78-0.93, p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The CARG chemo-toxicity calculator was not predictive of grade 3-5 toxicity in patients with hematologic malignancy. The SPPB was associated with overall survival in multivariable analysis, suggesting future use as an objective biomarker in HM. We also report a comprehensive trajectory of function, QoL, psychosocial well-being, and cognition among older adults with HM. The predictive accuracy of the CARG chemo-toxicity calculator may be affected by the diverse range of HM treatment options that are not traditional chemotherapy.

Prognostic value of electronic health records-based frailty measures for all-cause mortality in older patients with non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Frailty screening is important to guide treatment decisions for older patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the performance of frailty measures (FMs) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of FMs based on electronic health records (EHR) data in clinical settings for all-cause mortality in older patients with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 4253 patients aged ≥65 years, newly diagnosed with NSCLC (2007-2018) using EHR data from the National Cancer Center, Korea. Frailty was measured by either laboratory tests (frailty index based on routine laboratory tests [FI-Lab]), comorbidities and performance status (electronic Frailty index [eFI]), or both (combined frailty index [FI-combined]). Patients were categorized as frail or non-frail. Cox proportional hazards models and C-index were used to estimate the predictive ability of FMs for all-cause mortality in 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years post-diagnosis, adjusting for age, sex, and SEER stage.

RESULTS

EHR-based FMs could enhance the prognostic ability to predict the survival of older patients with NSCLC. In the total population, FI-Lab showed the largest predictive value, especially for 1-year mortality with an adjusted hazard ratio for frail vs. non-frail groups of 2.25 (95 % CI 2.02-2.51) and C-index of 0.74 compared to 0.72 in the base model (p-value<0.001). FI-Lab could improve the prognostic ability for 1-year mortality in patients with regional and distant SEER stages and those receiving systemic therapy, whereas FI-combined could improve the prediction of 3-year and 5-year mortality in patients with localized disease and receiving surgery.

DISCUSSION

Easy-to-use FMs derived from EHR data can enhance the prediction of all-cause mortality in older patients with NSCLC. Oncologists can utilize comprehensive FMs comprising comorbidities, functional status, and subclinical tests or FI-Lab, depending on the patient's medical condition, to facilitate shared cancer care planning.

The impact of multidisciplinary geriatric follow-up on quality of life in older, non-surgical prefrail and frail patients with cancer A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Cancer management in older frail patients can be complex, given the high decline in functional status, comorbidity, and limited life expectancy affecting this group of patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether oncological treatment combined with comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and tailored follow-up interventions improved or maintained quality of life (QoL) in older prefrail and frail patients with cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center randomized controlled trial included participants aged 70 or older with head, neck, lung, upper gastrointestinal tract, colon, or rectum cancer referred to non-surgical treatment. All participants underwent CGA conducted by a multidisciplinary geriatric team in an outpatient oncological clinic. The team consisted of a geriatrician and a specialized nurse who provided tailored follow-up visits and phone calls within 90 days after randomization. Exclusion criteria were fit patients, referral for specialized palliative care, or participating in another geriatric research program. In patients with well-functioning cognition, QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QlQ-ELD-14 questionnaires before and after the intervention. In patients with cognitive impairment, the Overall QoL-Depression List was used. Changes in QoL were dichotomized into improved/unchanged or worsened and analyzed in a logistic regression model.

RESULTS

In total, 363 participants were included with a mean age of 76 years (SD 4.6) and 45 % were female. Sixty percent in the intervention group had improved or unchanged QoL compared to 66 % in the control group (odds ratio: 0.75 [95 % confidence interval(CI): 0.45-1.23]). Overall, clinically important changes were found in fatigue and reduced worries about the future. The intervention showed improvements in insomnia symptoms and reported decreased role functioning. Discrepancies were found in the burden of illness without a clinically important difference, where the intervention group experienced an increased burden while the control group had a decreased burden (coefficient: 9.02 [95 % CI, 0.49-17.5]).

DISCUSSION

Multidisciplinary geriatric follow-up did not universally improve QoL in older frail patients with cancer. However, positive changes in specific aspects of QoL revealed nuanced impacts, warranting further exploration and larger studies to validate these observations. Tailored interventions targeting fatigue, insomnia, and emotional well-being are crucial for improving QoL in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in January 2016 at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02837679).

Frailty for neurologists: perspectives on how frailty influences care planning

The concept of frailty, now being adopted in most medical disciplines, is attracting growing interest in neurology. Every day, most neurologists care for patients with varying degrees of frailty, from very mild to very severe. Frailty exacerbates patients' health needs, complicates clinical decision making, and negatively affects their health outcomes. Increasing evidence suggests that frailty affects the risk, clinical presentation, and course of common age-related neurological disorders, including dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and multiple sclerosis. Most neurologists should become familiar with assessing and measuring frailty. Doing so can provide information that is crucial for diagnosis, prognostication, and care planning. Consideration of frailty can help to elucidate the pathophysiological underpinnings of age-related neurological disorders, clarify the clinical validity and utility of candidate biomarkers, and identify novel therapeutic targets. Randomised controlled trials investigating late-life neurological diseases that address frailty have the potential to provide insight into these complex disorders.

Germain DC, Guida J, Prasanna PGS, Buchsbaum JC. Older adults with cancer and common comorbidities-challenges and opportunities in improving their cancer treatment outcomes

The older American population is rapidly increasing, and millions of older adults will be cancer survivors with comorbidities. This population faces specific challenges regarding treatment and has unique clinical needs. Recognizing this need, the National Cancer Institute, in collaboration with the National Institute on Aging, hosted a webinar series, entitled Cancer, Aging, and Comorbidities. This commentary provides a reflection of 5 thematic areas covered by the webinar series, which was focused on improving cancer treatment for older adults with cancer and comorbidities: 1) the impact of comorbidities on treatment tolerability and patient outcomes; 2) the impact of comorbidities on cancer clinical trial design; 3) the development of wearable devices in measuring comorbidities in cancer treatment; 4) the effects of nutrition and the microbiome on cancer therapy; and 5) the role of senescence and senotherapy in age-related diseases. Advances have been made in these areas, however, many gaps and challenges exist and are discussed in this commentary. To improve cancer survivorship in older populations with comorbidities, aging and comorbidities must be jointly considered and incorporated across the spectrum of cancer research. This includes more basic research of the mechanisms linking comorbidities and cancer development and treatment response, building critical resources and infrastructure (eg, preclinical models and patient samples), conducting clinical trials focused on the older population, integrating geriatric assessment into cancer treatment, and incorporating novel technologies, such as wearable devices, into clinical trials and cancer care.

Prevalence and types of cancer in older Indians: A multicentric observational study across 17 institutions in India

The global demographic and epidemiological transition have led to a rapidly increasing burden of cancer, particularly among older adults. There are scant data on the prevalence and demographic pattern of cancer in older Indian persons. This was a multicentric observational study conducted between January 2019 and December 2020. Data were retrieved from existing electronic databases to gather information on two key variables: the total number of patients registered with oncologists and the number of patients aged 60 years and above. The primary objective was to determine the percentage of older adults among patients with cancer served by these hospitals. Secondary objectives included understanding the prevalence of different types of cancer in the older population, and the sex- and geographic distribution of cancer in older Indian patients. We included 272,488 patients with cancer from 17 institutes across India. Among them, 97,962 individuals (36 %) were aged 60 years and above. The proportion of older adults varied between 20.6 % and 53.6 % across the participating institutes. The median age of the older patients with cancer was 67 (interquartile range, 63-72) years. Of the 54,281 patients for whom the details regarding sex were available, 32,243 (59.4 %) were male. Of the 56,903 older patients, head and neck malignancies were the most prevalent, accounting for 11,158 cases (19.6 %), followed by breast cancer (6260 cases, 11 %), genitourinary cancers (6242 cases, 10.9 %), lung cancers (6082 cases, 10.7 %), hepatopancreaticobiliary (6074, 10.7 %), and hematological malignancies (5226 cases, 9.2 %). Over one-third of Indian patients with cancer are aged 60 years and above, with a male predominance. Head and neck, breast, and genitourinary cancers are the most prevalent in this age group. Characterizing the burden of cancer in older adults is crucial to enable tailored interventions and additional research to improve the care and support for this vulnerable population.

How to make a shared decision with older persons for end-stage kidney disease treatment: the added value of geronto-nephrology

Improving care for older people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requires the adaptation of standards to meet their needs. This may be complex due to their heterogeneity in terms of multimorbidity, frailty, cognitive decline and healthcare priorities. As benefits and risks are uncertain for these persons, choosing an appropriate treatment is a daily challenge for nephrologists. In this narrative review, we aimed to describe the issues associated with healthcare for older people, with a specific focus on decision-making processes; apply these concepts to the context of ESKD; identify components and modalities of shared decision-making and suggest means to improve care pathways. To this end, we propose a geronto-nephrology dynamic, described here as the necessary collaboration between these specialties. Underscoring gaps in the current evidence in this field led us to suggest priority research orientations.

Toxicity of Cancer Immunotherapies in Older Patients: Does Age Make a Difference?

The use of immunotherapy agents especially immune checkpoint inhibitors is growing, and toxicities known as immune-related adverse events affecting any organ system may develop as a consequence of the treatment. With an ageing population, a considerable number of patients who will receive these therapies will be older adults. However, older patients who have highly heterogenous clinical characteristics, age-related changes in the immune system, a higher prevalence of comorbidities and frailty have been poorly represented in clinical trials, leaving gaps in understanding the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor agents in this subgroup. Therefore, the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a primary point of consideration when treating older patients with cancer. The available evidence is conflicting, but it generally suggests that the incidence of immune-related adverse events is not necessarily higher in older patients, but it may have a different profile. It is important to also note that the management of immune-related adverse events can be a challenge in these patients, owing to the risks associated with the use of corticosteroids and a reduced physiological reserve. A comprehensive characterisation of immune ageing, potential biomarkers to predict immune-related adverse events, the use of measures for frailty, enrolling older patients with cancer to clinical trials and analysis of real-world data are necessary to improve the evidence-based decision making for immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in a geriatric oncology population.

Health-related quality of life with comprehensive geriatric assessment guided care versus usual care in older adults with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

To evaluate if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)-guided care improves health-related quality of life (HRQL) in older adults with cancer compared to usual care.

METHODS

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through biomedical databases. Meta-analyses using DerSimonian-Laird model summarized the difference in the mean change of HRQL scores from baseline across various time points, with evidence certainty assessed by the GRADE tool. Logistic regression via generalized estimating equations analyzed predictors of HRQL improvement.

RESULTS

Potential improvement in the global HRQL score by CGA-guided care at 3 months (Cohen's d 0.27, 95 % CI -0.03-0.58, moderate certainty), could not be excluded. Larger RCTs or those mandating CGA before initiating anti-cancer treatment were predictors of improved HRQL.

CONCLUSION

The effects of CGA-guided care on HRQL were variable. Larger RCTs and those mandating pre-treatment CGA tended to report improved HRQL.

Effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on hospitalizations in older adults with frailty initiating curatively intended oncologic treatment: The PROGNOSIS-RCT study

INTRODUCTION

Frailty constitutes a risk for unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with cancer. This study examines whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) as an add-on to standard oncologic care can prevent unplanned hospitalizations in older adults with frailty and cancer who initiate curative oncological treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized controlled trial included older adults aged ≥70 with frailty (Geriatric 8 [G8] ≤14), and solid cancers who initiated curative oncological treatment. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either standard oncologic care (control) or standard oncologic care supplemented with CGA-guided interventions (intervention). Baseline characteristics were retrieved prior to randomization. The primary endpoint, the between-group rate ratio of unplanned hospitalizations within six months of treatment initiation, was analyzed using negative binominal regression. Analyses were performed using an intention-to-treat approach, followed by per-protocol analysis, including participants receiving CGA within 30 days of randomization, and preplanned subgroup analyses based on treatment modality and Geriatric 8 screening. Secondary endpoints included acute hospital contacts, treatment adherence, and toxicity.

RESULTS

From November 1, 2020 to May 31, 2023, 173 participants were enrolled. Median age was 75 (interquartile range 72-79), 51.5% were female, 58% had a G8 score > 12, and 84% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. The most common cancer sites were lung (23%), upper gastrointestinal (15%), and breast (13%). The rate (per person-years) of unplanned hospitalization was 1.32 in the intervention group and 1.81 in the control group, with a between-group rate ratio of 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.23, P = 0.25) favoring the intervention. The between-group rate ratio increased in the per-protocol analysis (0.64 [95% CI 0.37-1.10, P = 0.10]). Similarly, no significant between group differences were found in treatment adherence, rate of acute hospital contacts, or toxicity.

DISCUSSION

In this study, CGA did not significantly reduce the rate of unplanned hospitalizations. Furthermore, no between-group differences were found in treatment adherence, toxicity lead hospitalizations, or treatment completion in older adults with cancer and frailty. However, per-protocol analysis suggests that increasing adherence to CGA may improve the outcome. Larger studies ensuring higher CGA adherence are warranted to confirm our findings.

Time toxicity among older patients with cancer treated with palliative systemic therapy

PURPOSE

The time toxicity of anticancer therapy, defined as days spent with healthcare contact during treatment, represents a critical but understudied outcome. This study aims to quantify time toxicity among older patients with cancer receiving palliative systemic treatment.

METHODS

All patients aged ≥ 65 years with metastatic cancer receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy at a single center in Mexico were selected from a prospective patient navigation cohort. Patients completed a baseline assessment, including the G8 screening and quality of life measures. Physical healthcare contact days within the first 6 months were extracted from medical records and divided by days alive during the same period. Beta regression models were used to identify predictors of time toxicity.

RESULTS

We identified 158 older patients (median age 71 years); 86% received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Seventy-three percent had an impaired G8 score and were considered vulnerable/frail. Six-month overall survival was 74%. Within the first 6 months, patients spent a mean of 21% (95% confidence interval (CI) 19-23%) of days with healthcare contact. Concurrent radiotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 1.55; 95%CI 1.21-1.97), cytotoxic chemotherapy versus targeted therapy (OR 1.64; 95%CI 1.13-2.37), and an impaired G8 (OR 1.27; 95%CI 1.01-1.60) were associated with increased time toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with metastatic cancer spend 1 in 5 days with healthcare contact during treatment, with a higher burden of time toxicity for patients receiving radiotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy and those with potential frailty. These findings underscore the importance of informing patients about their expected healthcare contact days within the context of a limited life expectancy.

Inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults in FDA registration studies of immunotherapy, 2018-2022

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have transformed the management of cancer, particularly for older adults, who constitute a majority of the global cancer patient population. This study aimed to assess the inclusion, characteristics, and reporting of older adults enrolled in Food and Drug Administration (FDA) registration clinical trials of ICI between 2018 and 2022. Clinical trials of ICI leading to an FDA approval in solid tumor oncology between 2018 and 2022 were included. Primary study reports and all available secondary publications were assessed. The availability and completeness of older subgroup data for protocol-defined clinical efficacy endpoints, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and toxicity outcomes, and baseline characteristics were assessed according to predefined criteria which categorized reporting completeness hierarchically in relation to the availability of published data, including effect size, sample size, and measures of precision. 53 registration trials were included, involving a total of 37,094 participants. Most trials (64.2%) were of ICI combination therapy. 42.3% of patients were aged≥65 years; 11.1% were aged≥75. No trials specified an upper age limit for eligibility. 98.1% of trials excluded patients with European Cooperative Oncology Group performance status>1. 87.2% of primary efficacy endpoints and 17.9% of secondary efficacy endpoints were reported completely for older adults. Five studies (9.4%) reported baseline characteristics, three (6.1%) reported HRQOL assessments, and four (7.5%) reported toxicity outcomes completely among older subgroups. No trials conducted baseline geriatric assessments or reported geriatric-specific symptoms or quality of life scales. This analysis highlights significant deficits in the enrollment and reporting of older subgroups in pivotal trials of ICI therapy. The findings highlight an urgent need for improved reporting and inclusion standards in clinical trials of ICI to better inform treatment decisions for older adults.

Concurrent nimotuzumab and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for elderly patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Because of the common physical condition, reduced organ function, and comorbidities, elderly patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are often underrepresented in clinical trials. The optimal treatment of elderly patients with locally advanced NPC remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of concurrent nimotuzumab combined with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in elderly patients with locally advanced NPC. We conducted a single-arm, phase II trial for elderly patients with stage III-IVA NPC (according to UICC-American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification, 8th edition). All patients received concurrent nimotuzumab (200 mg/week, 1 week prior to IMRT) combined with IMRT. The primary end-point was complete response (CR) rate. The secondary end-points were survival, safety, and geriatric assessment. Between March 13, 2017 and November 12, 2018, 30 patients were enrolled. In total, 20 (66.7%) patients achieved CR, and objective response was observed in 30 (100.0%) patients 1 month after radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 56.05 months (25th-75th percentile, 53.45-64.56 months). The 5-year locoregional relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 89.4%, 86.4%, 85.9%, 76.5%, and 78.8%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis occurred in 10 (33%) patients and grade 3 pneumonia in 3 (10%) patients. Concurrent nimotuzumab combined with IMRT is effective and well-tolerated for elderly patients with locally advanced NPC.

Impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment strategies and complications in older adults with colorectal cancer considering surgery

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in customizing care for elderly cancer patients, specifically focusing on colorectal cancer. The research compared treatment strategies and outcomes in older adults considered for surgery before and after the initiation of a Geriatric Oncology Service (GOS).

METHODS

Conducting a comparative study, two cohorts of consecutive colorectal cancer patients aged 75 or older were examined: the control group (n = 156) and the GOS group (n = 158). Upon the treating surgeon's GOS consultation request, a geriatrician and an oncologist performed CGA, guiding treatment decisions and perioperative interventions. Postoperative complications were compared using propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

In the GOS group, 91% (n = 116) underwent CGA consultations, influencing decisions to forego surgery in 12 patients. After PSM for surgical cases (controls n = 146, GOS n = 146), each group comprised 128 patients. Perioperative physical therapy and pharmacist referrals were more frequent in the GOS group. The GOS group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of postoperative complications (22%) compared to the control group (33%) (p = 0.0496).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing colorectal surgery post-GOS implementation experienced a notable reduction in postoperative complications, highlighting the positive impact of personalized geriatric assessment on surgical outcomes in the elderly.

Adequate assessment yields appropriate care-the role of geriatric assessment and management in older adults with cancer: a position paper from the ESMO/SIOG Cancer in the Elderly Working Group

With the aging population, older adults constitute a growing proportion of the new cancer cases. Given the heterogeneous health status among older adults and their susceptibility to aging-related vulnerabilities, understanding their diversity and its implications becomes increasingly crucial for prognostication and guiding diagnostics, treatment decisions, and follow-up, as well as informing supportive care interventions. Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) refers to the comprehensive evaluation of an older individual's health status with subsequent management plans focusing on both oncologic and non-oncologic interventions. In 2019, the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) established the ESMO/SIOG Cancer in the Elderly Working Group. This position paper reflects the recommendations of the working group. Our paper summarizes the existing evidence with a focus on recent key trials and based on this, we propose several recommendations and future directions.

[Frailty in Oncology: Updated Recommendations for Clinical Practice]

Frailty is a clinical condition associated with aging and resulting in increased risk of adverse outcomes upon exogenous or endogenous stressors. In oncology, cancer treatment itself can be a stressor event. In older cancer patients, frailty therefore not only enhances the probability of age-related health events such as institutionalization or falls, but also of treatment complications such as toxicity and interruption or discontinuation of therapy. As demonstrated by recent randomized-controlled trials conducted in older cancer patients receiving systemic treatment, the evaluation of frailty by geriatric assessment (GA) followed by an adjustment of the oncological therapy as well as targeted frailty interventions help to improve cancer treatment tolerability and feasibility. Based on these data, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) updated the clinical practice guidelines for the assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older adults receiving systemic cancer therapy. The guideline recommends the use of a new GA-tool named 'practical geriatric assessment' (PGA) to foster the implementation of GA-based frailty assessment and management in routine cancer care. This article describes the background and key aspects of these recent advances.

An Annual Symposium on Disparities in Milwaukee, WI, with a 2023 Focus on Older Adults with Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer-related inequities are prevalent in Wisconsin, with lower survival rates for breast, colorectal, and lung cancer patients from marginalized communities. This manuscript describes the ongoing efforts at the Medical College of Wisconsin and potential pathways of community engagement to promote education and awareness in reducing inequities in cancer care.

RECENT FINDINGS

While some cancer inequities are related to aggressive disease biology, health-related social risks may be addressed through community-academic partnerships via an open dialogue between the community members and academic faculty. To develop potential pathways of community-academic partnerships, an annual Cancer Disparities Symposium concept evolved as a pragmatic and sustainable model in an interactive learning environment. In this manuscript, we describe the programmatic development and execution of the annual Cancer Disparities Symposium, followed by highlights from this year's meeting focused on geriatric oncology as discussed by the speakers.

TOward a comPrehensive supportive Care intervention for Older men with metastatic Prostate cancer (TOPCOP3): A pilot randomized controlled trial and process evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Current management of metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) includes androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy (ARATs), which is associated with substantial toxicity in older adults. Geriatric assessment and management and remote symptom monitoring have been shown to reduce toxicity and improve quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy, but their efficacy in patients being treated with ARATs has not been explored. The purpose of this study is to examine whether these interventions, alone or in combination, can improve treatment tolerability and quality of life (QOL) for older adults with metastatic prostate cancer on ARATs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

TOPCOP3 is a multi-centre, factorial pilot clinical trial coupled with an embedded process evaluation. The study includes four treatment arms: geriatric assessment and management (GA + M); remote symptom monitoring (RSM); geriatric assessment and management plus remote symptom monitoring; and usual care and will be followed for six months. The aim is to recruit 168 patients between two cancer centres in Toronto, Canada. Eligible participants will be randomized equally via REDCap. Participants in all arms will complete a comprehensive baseline assessment upon enrollment following the Geriatric Core dataset, as well as follow-up assessments at 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 months. The co-primary outcomes will be grade 3-5 toxicity and QOL. Toxicities will be graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. QOL will be measured by patient self-reporting using the EuroQol 5 dimensions of health questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include fatigue, insomnia, and depression. Finally, four process evaluation outcomes will also be observed, namely feasibility, fidelity, and acceptability, along with implementation barriers and facilitators.

DISCUSSION

Data will be collected to observe the effects of GA + M and RSM on QOL and toxicities experienced by older adults receiving ARATs for metastatic prostate cancer. Data will also be collected to help the design and conduct of a definitive multicentre phase III randomized controlled trial. This study will extend supportive care interventions for older adults with cancer into new areas and inform the design of larger trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (registration number: NCT05582772).

Geriatric Assessment in the Era of Targeted and Immunotherapy

Cancer is a disease that mostly affects older adults and because of the aging of the population, the number of older adults diagnosed with cancer will increase significantly around the world. With increasing age, more older adults are living with frailty, and this may impact the tolerability of cancer treatments. International guidelines, such as the American Society for Clinical Oncology geriatric oncology guideline, recommend a geriatric assessment and management for all older adults with cancer to support the treatment decision-making process as well as develop a plan for supportive care interventions to support the older adults during cancer treatments. While there is clinical trial evidence to support a geriatric assessment and management for older adults receiving chemotherapy, there is less evidence to support a geriatric assessment for older adults starting immunotherapy. There are increasing numbers of new immunotherapies and targeted therapies available for older adults with cancer but often few older adults have been included in the clinical trials, leaving less evidence for clinicians to guide treatment decisions. In this current opinion, we review the current evidence on the use of a geriatric assessment and management in the context of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. We review how a geriatric assessment could support older adults making treatment decisions for immunotherapy, review how geriatric assessment parameters are linked with outcomes and provide guidance on how geriatric assessment can guide the supportive care plan during immunotherapy treatment.

Improving Care for Older Adults with Cancer in Canada: A Call to Action

Most patients diagnosed with and dying from cancer in Canada are older adults, with aging contributing to the large projected growth in cancer incidence. Older adults with cancer have unique needs, and on a global scale increasing efforts have been made to address recognized gaps in their cancer care. However, in Canada, geriatric oncology remains a new and developing field. There is increasing recognition of the value of geriatric oncology and there is a growing number of healthcare providers interested in developing the field. While there is an increasing number of dedicated programs in geriatric oncology, they remain limited overall. Developing novel methods to delivery geriatric care in the oncology setting and improving visibility is important. Formal incorporation of a geriatric oncology curriculum into training is critical to both improve knowledge and demonstrate its value to healthcare providers. Although a robust group of dedicated researchers exist, increased collaboration is needed to capitalize on existing expertise. Dedicated funding is critical to promoting clinical programs, research, and training new clinicians and leaders in the field. By addressing challenges and capitalizing on opportunities for improvement, Canada can better meet the unique needs of its aging population with cancer and ultimately improve their outcomes.

Frequency of use and characterization of frailty assessments in observational studies on older women with breast cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer and frailty frequently co-occur in older women, and frailty status has been shown to predict negative health outcomes. However, the extent to which frailty assessments are utilized in observational research for the older breast cancer population is uncertain. Therefore, the aim of this review was to determine the frequency of use of frailty assessments in studies investigating survival or mortality, and characterize them, concentrating on literature from the past 5 years (2017-2022).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were systematically queried to identify observational studies (case-control, cohort, cross-sectional) published from 2017-2022 that focus on older females (≥ 65 years) diagnosed with breast cancer, and which evaluate survival or mortality outcomes. Independent reviewers assessed the studies for eligibility using Covidence software. Extracted data included characteristics of each study as well as information on study design, study population, frailty assessments, and related health status assessments. Risk of bias was evaluated using the appropriate JBI tool. Information was cleaned, classified, and tabulated into review level summaries.

RESULTS

In total, 9823 studies were screened for inclusion. One-hundred and thirty studies were included in the final synthesis. Only 11 (8.5%) of these studies made use of a frailty assessment, of which 4 (3.1%) quantified frailty levels in their study population, at baseline. Characterization of frailty assessments demonstrated that there is a large variation in terms of frailty definitions and resulting patient classification (i.e., fit, pre-frail, frail). In the four studies that quantified frailty, the percentage of individuals classified as pre-frail and frail ranged from 18% to 29% and 0.7% to 21%, respectively. Identified frailty assessments included the Balducci score, the Geriatric 8 tool, the Adapted Searle Deficits Accumulation Frailty index, the Faurot Frailty index, and the Mian Deficits of Accumulation Frailty Index, among others. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was the most used alternative health status assessment, employed in 56.9% of all 130 studies. Surprisingly, 31.5% of all studies did not make use of any health status assessments.

CONCLUSION

Few observational studies examining mortality or survival outcomes in older women with breast cancer incorporate frailty assessments. Additionally, there is significant variation in definitions of frailty and classification of patients. While comorbidity assessments were more frequently included, the pivotal role of frailty for patient-centered decision-making in clinical practice, especially regarding treatment effectiveness and tolerance, necessitates more deliberate attention. Addressing this oversight more explicitly could enhance our ability to interpret observational research in older cancer patients.

Geriatric assessment with management for older patients with cancer receiving radiotherapy: a cluster-randomised controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Geriatric assessment and management (GAM) improve outcomes in older patients with cancer treated with surgery or chemotherapy. It is unclear whether GAM may provide better function and quality of life (QoL), or be cost-effective, in a radiotherapy (RT) setting.

METHODS

In this Norwegian cluster-randomised controlled pilot study, we assessed the impact of a GAM intervention involving specialist and primary health services. It was initiated in-hospital at the start of RT by assessing somatic and mental health, function, and social situation, followed by individually adapted management plans and systematic follow-up in the municipalities until 8 weeks after the end of RT, managed by municipal nurses as patients' care coordinators. Thirty-two municipal/city districts were 1:1 randomised to intervention or conventional care. Patients with cancer ≥ 65 years, referred for RT, were enrolled irrespective of cancer type, treatment intent, and frailty status, and followed the allocation of their residential district. The primary outcome was physical function measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes were overall quality of life (QoL), physical performance, use and costs of health services. Analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Study registration at ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT03881137.

RESULTS

We included 178 patients, 89 in each group with comparable age (mean 74.1), sex (female 38.2%), and Edmonton Frail Scale scores (mean 3.4 [scale 0-17], scores 0-3 [fit] in 57%). More intervention patients received curative RT (76.4 vs 61.8%), had higher irradiation doses (mean 54.1 vs 45.5 Gy), and longer lasting RT (mean 4.4 vs 3.6 weeks). The primary outcome was completed by 91% (intervention) vs 88% (control) of patients. No significant differences between groups on predefined outcomes were observed. GAM costs represented 3% of health service costs for the intervention group during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this heterogeneous cohort of older patients receiving RT, the majority was fit. We found no impact of the intervention on patient-centred outcomes or the cost of health services. Targeting a more homogeneous group of only pre-frail and frail patients is strongly recommended in future studies needed to clarify the role and organisation of GAM in RT settings.

Geriatric Oncology: A 5-Year Strategic Plan

The increasing rate of the older adult population across the world over the next 20 years along with significant developments in the treatment of oncology will require a more granular understanding of the older adult population with cancer. The ASCO Geriatric Oncology Community of Practice (COP) herein provides an outline for the field along three fundamental pillars: education, research, and implementation, inspired by ASCO's 5-Year Strategic Plan. Fundamental to improving the understanding of geriatric oncology is research that intentionally includes older adults with clinically meaningful data supported by grants across all career stages. The increased knowledge base that is developed should be conveyed among health care providers through core competencies for trainees and continuing education for practicing oncologists. ASCO's infrastructure can serve as a resource for fellowship programs interested in acquiring geriatric oncology content and provide recommendations on developing training pathways for fellows interested in pursuing formalized training in geriatrics. Incorporating geriatric oncology into everyday practice is challenging as each clinical setting has unique operational workflows with barriers that limit implementation of valuable geriatric tools such as Geriatric Assessment. Partnerships among experts in quality improvement from the ASCO Geriatric Oncology COP, the Cancer and Aging Research Group, and ASCO's Quality Training Program can provide one such venue for implementation of geriatric oncology through a structured support mechanism. The field of geriatric oncology must continue to find innovative strategies using existing resources and partnerships to address the pressing needs of the older adult population with cancer to improve patient outcomes.

Exploring management and outcomes of elderly patients with glioblastoma using data from two randomised trials (GEINO1401/EX-TEM)

PURPOSE

The impact of age on optimal management of glioblastoma remains unclear. A recent combined analysis of two randomised trials, GEINO14-01 and EX-TEM, found no benefit from extending post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Here, we explore the impact of age.

METHODS

Relevant intergroup statistics were used to identify differences in tumour, treatment and outcome characteristics based on age with elderly patients (EP) defined as age 65 years and over. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

Of the combined 205 patients, 57 (28%) were EP. Of these, 95% were ECOG 0-1 and 65% underwent macroscopic resection compared with 97% and 61% of younger patients (YP) respectively. There were numerically less MGMT-methylated (56% vs. 63%, p = 0.4) and IDH-mutated (4% vs. 13%, p = 0.1) tumours in EP vs. YP. Following surgery, EP were more likely to receive short course chemoradiation (17.5% vs. 6%, p = 0.017). At recurrence, EP tended to receive or best supportive care (28.3% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.09) or non-surgical options (96.2% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.06), but were less likely to receive bevacizumab (23.1% vs. 49.5%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was similar at 9.3months in EP and 8.5months in YP, with similar median OS at 20months.

CONCLUSION

In this trial population of predominantly fit EP, survival was similar to YP despite a proportion receiving less aggressive therapy at diagnosis and recurrence. Advancing age does not appear to be an adverse prognostic factor for glioblastoma when patients are fit for treatment, and a less aggressive approach in selected patients may not compromise outcomes.

Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.