Antibiotic Overuse is a Major Risk Factor for Clostridium difficile Infection in Surgical Patients

Antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections-a systematic review

Background

Reducing antibiotic duration is a key stewardship intervention to mitigate antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We examined current evidence informing antibiotic duration for common bacterial infections to identify any gaps in terms of settings, patient populations and infectious conditions. Trial methodologies were assessed to identify areas for improvement.

Methods

MEDLINE and Embase were searched up to July 2024 for randomized trials comparing antibiotic durations in hospital and community settings (PROSPERO 2021, CRD42021276209). A narrative synthesis of the results was performed with a review on the major guidelines published by IDSA, NICE, WHO and other international societies to assess the impact of these trials on practice guidance.

Results

Out of 315 studies, 85% concluded equivalence or non-inferiority of shorter courses. Adult bacterial sinusitis, community-acquired pneumonia, female cystitis/pyelonephritis, uncomplicated cellulitis and intra-abdominal infection with adequate source control and perioperative prophylaxis had robust evidence supporting shorter durations. Few trials studied severe infections, such as bloodstream infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Twenty-three (7%) of the trials were conducted in intensive care settings and only 43 trials (14%) enrolled patients from low-to-middle- or low-income countries. Only 15% of studies were at low risk for bias.

Conclusions

Reducing antibiotic duration likely remains an important strategy for antibiotic stewardship, and an area of active research. While shorter antibiotic courses may be suitable for many bacterial infections, more evidence is needed for severe infections and in low- and middle-income settings.

Single-Dose Versus Multiple-Dose Prophylactic Antibiotics in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines about preventing surgical site infections (SSIs) recommend against the administration of prophylactic antibiotics after surgery. However, many colorectal surgeons still prefer prolonged use of prophylactic antibiotics. While minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has become the standard for colorectal cancer surgery, there were few studies about proper dose of prophylactic antibiotics in minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. All patients underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery using MIS. Intravenous cefotetan was administered as a prophylactic antibiotic. Two groups were classified according to the dose of prophylactic antibiotics: a group using a single dose preoperatively (single-dose group) and a group using a preoperative single dose plus additional doses within 24 hours after surgery (multiple-dose group). The SSI rates between the two groups were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM). Risk factors of SSIs were assessed using univariate and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

There were 902 patients in the single-dose group and 330 patients in the multiple-dose group. After PSM, 320 patients were included in each group. There were no differences in baseline characteristics and surgical outcomes except the length of hospital stay. SSI rates were not different between the two groups before and after PSM (before 2.0% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.890; after 0.9% vs. 1.9%, P = 0.505). In multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3, rectal surgery, intraoperative transfusion, and larger tumor size were identified as independent factors associated with SSI incidence.

CONCLUSION

A single preoperative dose of prophylactic antibiotics may be sufficient to prevent SSIs in elective MIS for colorectal cancer.

A pilot intervention trial to reduce the use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endourologic surgeries

OBJECTIVE

Post-procedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended by professional guidelines but is commonly prescribed. We sought to reduce use of post-procedural antimicrobials after common endoscopic urologic procedures.

DESIGN

A before-after, quasi-experimental trial with a baseline (July 2020-June 2022), an implementation (July 2022), and an intervention period (August 2022-July 2023).

SETTING

Three participating medical centers.

INTERVENTION

We assessed the effect of a bundled intervention on excess post-procedural antimicrobial use (ie, antimicrobial use on post-procedural day 1) after three types of endoscopic urologic procedures: ureteroscopy and transurethral resection of bladder tumor or prostate. The intervention consisted of education, local champion(s), and audit-and-feedback of data on the frequency of post-procedural antimicrobial-prescribing.

RESULTS

1,272 procedures were performed across all 3 sites at baseline compared to 525 during the intervention period; 644 (50.6%) patients received excess post-procedural antimicrobials during the baseline period compared to 216 (41.1%) during the intervention period. There was no change in the use of post-procedural antimicrobials at sites 1 and 2 between the baseline and intervention periods. At site 3, the odds of prescribing a post-procedural antimicrobial significantly decreased during the intervention period relative to the baseline time trend (0.09; 95% CI 0.02-0.45). There was no significant increase in post-procedural unplanned visits at any of the sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a bundled intervention was associated with reduced post-procedural antimicrobial use at one of three sites, with no increase in complications. These findings demonstrate both the safety and challenge of guideline implementation for optimal perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis.This trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04196777.

Benefits and Risks Associated With Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Thyroid Operations

INTRODUCTION

Prophylactic antibiotics (pABX) are commonly used prior to thyroid operations despite clean case classification. The objective of this study was to assess the association of antibiotic prophylaxis with the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) among patients undergoing thyroidectomy.

METHODS

We performed a cohort study of all adults undergoing thyroid operations at a tertiary referral center from 2010 to 2019. The primary outcome was 30-d SSI, based on diagnosis codes and/or antibiotic use and further classified based on whether wound aspiration or operative washout were required. The association between pABX and SSI was determined using propensity score matching based on patient demographics and comorbidities likely to influence SSI risk.

RESULTS

We identified 2411 patients who underwent thyroid operations, of whom 1358 (56.3%) received pABX. Patients who received pABX had a higher mean Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index score than patients who did not (3.6 versus 2.9). The unadjusted incidence of SSI was higher in patients who received pABX than those who did not (6.1% versus 3.4%, P < 0.001). Few patients with SSI required aspiration or operative washout (0.29% who received pABX versus 0.19% who did not). After propensity score matching, pABX use showed no association with overall 30-d SSI (odds ratio 1.38, 95% confidence interval 0.84-2.26) or SSI requiring procedural intervention (odds ratio 3.01, 95% confidence interval 0.24-158).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of patients with a high prevalence of comorbidity, use of pABX was not associated with a decreased incidence of SSI following thyroid surgery. Efforts should be made to deimplement low-value pABX use in thyroid surgery.

The burden of infectious diseases throughout and after the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2023) and Russo-Ukrainian war migration

Understanding how the infectious disease burden was affected throughout the COVID-19 pandemic is pivotal to identifying potential hot spots and guiding future mitigation measures. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze the changes in the rate of new cases of Poland's most frequent infectious diseases during the entire COVID-19 pandemic and after the influx of war refugees from Ukraine. We performed a registry-based population-wide study in Poland to analyze the changes in the rate of 24 infectious disease cases from 2020 to 2023 and compared them to the prepandemic period (2016-2019). Data were collected from publicly archived datasets of the Epimeld database published by national epidemiological authority institutions. The rate of most of the studied diseases (66.6%) revealed significantly negative correlations with the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections. For the majority of infectious diseases, it substantially decreased in 2020 (in case of 83%) and 2021 (63%), following which it mostly rebounded to the prepandemic levels and, in some cases, exceeded them in 2023 when the exceptionally high annual rates of new cases of scarlet fever, Streptococcus pneumoniae infections, HIV infections, syphilis, gonococcal infections, and tick-borne encephalitis were noted. The rate of Clostridioides difficile enterocolitis was two-fold higher than before the pandemic from 2021 onward. The rate of Legionnaires' disease in 2023 also exceeded the prepandemic threshold, although this was due to a local outbreak unrelated to lifted COVID-19 pandemic restrictions or migration of war refugees. The influx of war migrants from Ukraine could impact the epidemiology of sexually transmitted diseases. The present analysis indicates that continued efforts are needed to prevent COVID-19 from overwhelming healthcare systems again and decreasing the control over the burden of other infectious diseases. It also identifies the potential tipping points that require additional mitigation measures, which are also discussed in the paper, to avoid escalation in the future.

Assessment of antimicrobial prescribing patterns, guidelines compliance, and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in surgical-practice units: point prevalence survey in Malaysian teaching hospitals

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among adult surgical inpatients besides exploring the determinants of non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing to inform stewardship activities. Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study employing Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) was conducted in April 2019 at two teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Results: Among 566 surgical inpatients, 44.2% were receiving at least one antimicrobial, for a total of 339 prescriptions. Antimicrobials belonging to the World Health Organization's Watch group were observed in 57.8% of cases. Both hospitals exhibited similar types of antimicrobial treatments prescribed and administration routes. A significant difference in antimicrobial choice was observed between hospitals (p < 0.001). Hospital with electronic prescribing demonstrated better documentation practice (p < 0.001). Guidelines compliance, 32.8% (p = 0.952) and appropriateness, 55.2% (p = 0.561) did not significantly differ. The major contributors of inappropriateness were incorrect duration, (15%) and unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage, (15.6%). Non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing were found to be 2 to 4 times significantly higher with antimicrobial prophylaxis prescription compared to empirical therapy. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve appropriate surgical prescribing are essential. These initiatives should prioritize surgical prophylaxis prescribing, focusing on reducing unnecessarily prolonged use and broad-spectrum antimicrobials, raising awareness among prescribers and promoting proper documentation.

What Is the Ideal Duration for Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis?

Background: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis practice became common in the 1970s and has since become almost universal. The earliest articles used three doses over 12 hours with the first being administered before the start of the operation. Conclusions: The duration of prophylaxis has varied widely in practice over time, but an increasing body of evidence has supported shorter durations, most recently with recommendations in influential guidelines to avoid administration after the incision is closed.

Development of machine learning algorithms for scaling-up antibiotic stewardship

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic stewardship programs (ASP) aim to reduce inappropriate use of antibiotics, but their labor-intensive nature impedes their wide adoption. The present study introduces explainable machine learning (ML) models designed to prioritize inpatients who would benefit most from stewardship interventions.

METHODS

A cohort of inpatients who received systemic antibiotics and were monitored by a multidisciplinary ASP team at a tertiary hospital in the Republic of Korea was assembled. Data encompassing over 130,000 patient-days and comprising more than 160 features from multiple domains, including prescription records, laboratory, microbiology results, and patient conditions was collected.Outcome labels were generated using medication administration history: discontinuation, switching from intravenous to oral medication (IV to PO), and early or late de-escalation. The models were trained using Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) and light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM), with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis used to explain the model's predictions.

RESULTS

The models demonstrated strong discrimination when evaluated on a hold-out test set(AUROC - IV to PO: 0.81, Early de-escalation: 0.78, Late de-escalation: 0.72, Discontinue: 0.80). The models identified 41%, 16%, 22%, and 17% more cases requiring discontinuation, IV to PO, early and late de-escalation, respectively, compared to the conventional length of therapy strategy, given that the same number of patients were reviewed by the ASP team. The SHAP results explain how each model makes their predictions, highlighting a unique set of important features that are well-aligned with the clinical intuitions of the ASP team.

CONCLUSIONS

The models are expected to improve the efficiency of ASP activities by prioritizing cases that would benefit from different types of ASP interventions along with detailed explanations.

Evaluation of antibiotic appropriateness at an outpatient oncology centre

Current evidence supporting antimicrobial stewardship programs focused largely in inpatient setting. With the shift in cancer management from inpatient to ambulatory setting, it is crucial to examine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotics prescribing. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). Patients at least 21 years, with an active or past cancer diagnosis and prescribed with at least one oral antibiotic by a NCCS physician from 1st July to 30th September 2019 were included. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed using institutional antibiotic guidelines or published clinical practice guidelines. For cases where antibiotics appropriateness cannot be ascertained using these guidelines, an independent three-member expert panel was consulted. A total of 815 patients were screened; 411 (59.4% females) were included with mean age of 62.4 years. The top three cancer diagnoses were breast (26.5%), lung (15.6%) and head and neck (13.6%). More than half (58.6%) received appropriate antibiotic choice. Of which, 235 (97.5%), 238 (98.8%) and 194 (80.5%) received appropriate dose, frequency and duration respectively. The presence of non-oncologic immunosuppressive comorbidities (OR 4.890, 95% CI 1.556-15.369, p-value = 0.007), antibiotic allergy (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.178-4.698, p-value = 0.015) and skin and soft tissue infections (OR 2.004, 95% CI 1.276-3.146, p-value = 0.003) were associated with a higher incidence of inappropriate antibiotic choice. This study highlighted that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is prevalent in the ambulatory oncology setting. Predicators identified can aid in the design of targeted strategies to optimise antibiotic use in ambulatory oncology patients.

Post-procedural Antibiotic Use and Associated Outcomes After Common Urologic Procedures Across a National Healthcare System

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the benefits and harms of post-procedural antibiotic use after common urologic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent an endoscopic urologic procedure (transurethral resection of bladder tumor, transurethral resection of prostate, or ureteroscopy) within the Veterans Health Administration between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2021. A post-procedural antibiotic was any qualifying antibiotic prescribed for administration on the day after the procedure. Guidelines generally do not recommend post-procedural antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis. Outcomes included unplanned return visits and Clostridioides difficile infection within 30 days. Log-binomial models with risk-adjustment were used to measure the association between post-procedural antibiotic use and outcomes. Hospital-level observed-to-expected (O:E) ratios were constructed to compare post-procedural antibiotic use.

RESULTS

There were 74,629 qualifying procedures across 105 hospitals; 27,422 (36.7%) received post-procedural antibiotics (median 3 days, IQR 3-6). An unplanned return visit occurred in 20.2% of patients who received post-procedural antibiotics vs 17.2% who did not (adjusted RR 1.032, 95% CI 0.999-1.066). C. difficile infection was diagnosed in 0.27% vs 0.10% in those who received and did not receive post-procedural antibiotics (adjusted RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.13-2.45). The O:E ratio for post-procedural antibiotic use ranged from 0.46 among hospitals in the lowest-use quartile to 1.93 in the highest-use quartile.

CONCLUSION

Post-procedural antibiotics were frequently prescribed after urologic procedures with large inter-facility variability even after adjusting for case-mix differences. Post-procedural antibiotic use was associated with increased risk for C. difficile infection but not fewer unplanned return visits. Efforts to reduce guideline-discordant use of post-procedural antibiotics are needed.

A Meta-Analysis on the Impact of Prenatal and Early Childhood Antimicrobial Use on Autism Spectrum Disorders

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of prenatal and early childhood antimicrobial use on autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed and Embase databases for relevant studies from inception to August 2022.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Peer-reviewed, observational studies were all acceptable. Raw data were extracted into a predefined worksheet and quality analysis was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nineteen studies were identified in the meta-analysis. Prenatal antimicrobial exposure was not associated with ASD (P = 0.06 > 0.05), whereas early childhood antimicrobial exposure was associated with an increased odds ratio of ASD (OR = 1.17, 95% CI = [1.08-1.27], P value < 0.001). The sibling-matched analysis, with a very limited sample size, suggested that neither prenatal (P = 0.47 > 0.05) nor early childhood (P = 0.13 > 0.05) antimicrobial exposure was associated with ASD. Medical professionals may need to take the possible association into consideration when prescribing an antimicrobial in children.

CONCLUSIONS

Early childhood antimicrobial exposure could increase the incidence of ASD. In future studies, it would be necessary to control for confounding factors, such as genetic factors, parenteral age at birth, or low birthweight, to further validate the association.

Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics following mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly prescribed at discharge for mastectomy, despite guidelines recommending against this practice. We investigated factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction and the impact on surgical-site infection (SSI).

STUDY DESIGN

We studied a cohort of women aged 18-64 years undergoing mastectomy between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015, using the MarketScan commercial database. Patients with nonsurgical perioperative infections were excluded. Postdischarge oral antibiotics were identified from outpatient drug claims. SSI was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Generalized linear models were used to determine factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use and SSI.

RESULTS

The cohort included 38,793 procedures; 24,818 (64%) with immediate reconstruction. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed after discharge after 2,688 mastectomy-only procedures (19.2%) and 17,807 mastectomies with immediate reconstruction (71.8%). The 90-day incidence of SSI was 3.5% after mastectomy only and 8.8% after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Antibiotics with anti-methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) activity were associated with decreased SSI risk after mastectomy only (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.99) and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.88), respectively. The numbers needed to treat to prevent 1 additional SSI were 107 and 48, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were common after mastectomy. Anti-MSSA antibiotics were associated with decreased risk of SSI for patients who had mastectomy only and those who had mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. The high numbers needed to treat suggest that potential benefits of postdischarge antibiotics should be weighed against potential harms associated with antibiotic overuse.

Antibiotic Therapy for Culture-Proven Bacterial Overgrowth in Children With Intestinal Failure Results in Improved Symptoms and Growth

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate symptoms, enteral tolerance, growth, and antibiotic regimens in pediatric intestinal failure (IF) patients after treated with antibiotic therapy for small bowel bacterial overgrowth (SBBO).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective review of children 0-18 years with IF with endoscopic cultures demonstrating >10 5 CFU/mL from 2010 to 2017. Symptoms, enteral tolerance, growth, and antibiotic regimens were evaluated at the time of endoscopy and 6 months later.

RESULTS

Of 505 patients followed in our intestinal rehabilitation program, 104 underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 78 had positive duodenal cultures. Clinical data pre- and post-endoscopy were available for 56 patients. Compared to baseline, in the 6 months following targeted antibiotic treatment, children showed significant improvement in emesis or feeding intolerance (58.9% vs 23.2%, P < 0.001), abdominal pain (16.1% vs 7.1%, P = 0.02), high stool output (42.9% vs 19.6%, P = 0.002), and gross GI bleeding (19.6% vs 3.6%, P = 0.003). Mean BMI-for-age z scores increased significantly (-0.03 ± 0.94 vs 0.27 ± 0.82, P = 0.03); however, height-for-age z scores, weight-for-age z scores, and percent of calories from enteral intake were not significantly different after therapy. Antibiotic regimens remained highly variable.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with IF and culture-positive SBBO showed significant improvement in symptoms and BMI-for-age z scores after duodenal culture with subsequent targeted antibiotic therapy. Longer follow-up may be needed to detect improvements in linear growth and percent of calories from enteral feeds. Antibiotic regimens remain highly variable. Long-term consequences of chronic antimicrobial therapy, including antimicrobial resistance, remain unknown. Prospective studies focused on standardizing duodenal sampling technique, correlating culture and pathology data, and evaluating antibiotic resistance patterns are needed.

Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in Australian burns patients

Background: Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is perceived to reduce intraoperative bacteraemia and prevent surgical site infections, however, the evidence for its use in burns surgery is limited. Excessive use of perioperative antibiotics has become a growing concern. The authors aimed to audit the prescribing practices of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis at the Victorian Adult Burns Service and determine whether the duration of antibiotic prophylaxis influenced the risk of postoperative wound infection, bacte-raemia and antibiotic resistance. Methods: This retrospective chart review included all acute adult burns patients who had an operation between November 2018 and November 2019. Basic demographic data, burn specific data and data on perioperative antibiotic use were collected. The outcome measures were wound infection, bacteraemia, other infections and presence of resistant organisms. Results: Results demonstrated that almost all patients (98.6%) received perioperative antibiotic prophylax-is. In comparison, there was no significant difference between the rate of postoperative wound infection, bacteraemia or antibiotic resistance between patients receiving a short or long course of antibiotics. Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrate variable use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with-in one burns unit. There were many cases of unsubstantiated use of long courses of antibiotics without apparent benefit for clinical outcomes of wound infection or bacteraemia. With the growing concern over antibiotic overuse and development of resistance, there is an increasing need for development of clear guidelines for antibiotic use in burns surgery.

Lack of association of post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics with decreased risk of surgical site infection following spinal fusion

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence and factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion and whether use was associated with decreased risk of surgical site infection (SSI).

METHODS

Persons aged 10-64 years undergoing spinal fusion between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2015 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. Complicated patients and those coded for infection from 30 days before to 2 days after the surgical admission were excluded. Outpatient oral antibiotics were identified within 2 days of surgical discharge. SSI was defined using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes within 90 days of surgery. Generalized linear models were used to determine factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use and with SSI.

RESULTS

The cohort included 156 446 fusion procedures, with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics used in 9223 (5.9%) surgeries. SSIs occurred after 2557 (1.6%) procedures. Factors significantly associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics included history of lymphoma, diabetes, 3-7 versus 1-2 vertebral levels fused, and non-infectious postoperative complications. In multivariable analysis, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with SSI risk after spinal fusion (relative risk 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-discharge prophylactic oral antibiotics after spinal fusion were used more commonly in patients with major medical comorbidities, more complex surgeries and those with postoperative complications during the surgical admission. After adjusting for surgical complexity and infection risk factors, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with decreased SSI risk. These results suggest that prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use should be avoided after spine surgery, given the lack of benefit and potential for harm.

Clostridium difficile infection after orthopedic surgery: Incidence, associated factors, and impact on outcome

BACKGROUND

To identify the incidence, associated factors, and impact of hospital-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) among patients who have undergone orthopedic surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all adults patients who underwent orthopedic surgery from January 2016 through December 2017 at a tertiary hospital.

RESULTS

Of 7,363 patients who underwent orthopedic surgical procedures, 52 (0.7%) developed hospital-acquired CDI. The independent factors associated with CDI were age ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.4; P < .001), preoperative hospital stay ≥3 days (aOR, 3.7; P < .001), operating time ≥3 hours (aOR, 2.5; P < .005), and antibiotic use for infection treatment (aOR, 4.3; P < .001). After adjusting for the timing of CDI using a multistate model, the mean excess LOS attributable to CDI was 2.8 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-5.3). The impact of CDI on excess LOS was more evident among patients aged ≥65 years (4.4 days; 95% CI, 1.8-7.0) and those with any comorbidity (5.6 days; 95% CI, 3.0-8.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall incidence of CDI after orthopedic surgery was 0.7%. The occurrence of CDI after orthopedic surgery contributes to increased LOS. The greatest impact of CDI on LOS occurs among elderly patients and patients with comorbidities.

Trends in antibiotics use among long-term US nursing-home residents

OBJECTIVES

Antibiotics are overly prescribed in nursing homes. Recent antibiotic stewardship efforts attempt to reduce inappropriate use. Our objective was to describe antibiotic use from 2012 to 2016 among nursing-home residents with various health conditions.

DESIGN

Retrospective, repeated cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All long-term residents in a random 10% sample of national nursing homes: 2,092,809 assessments from 319,615 nursing-home residents in 1,562 nursing homes.

MEASUREMENTS

We calculated a 1-day antibiotic prevalence using all annual and quarterly clinical assessments in the Minimum Data Set (MDS) from April 2012 through December 2016. We calculated prevalence of antibiotic use overall and within conditions of interest: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD), advanced cognitive impairment (ACI), and infections likely to be treated with antibiotics. We applied logistic regressions with nursing-home cluster, robust standard errors to assess changes in conditions and antibiotic use 2012-2016.

RESULTS

Overall, antibiotic use did not change (2012 vs 2016, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.03). Antibiotic use was higher in 2016 versus 2012 among assessments with any infection (AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.16), urinary tract infection (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.12-1.25), and no infection (AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.09-1.17). Results were similar by cognitive status.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased proportion of assessments recording antibiotics but no infection may not be clinically appropriate. Higher antibiotic use among infected residents with advanced cognitive impairment is also concerning. Further efforts to understand mechanisms driving these trends and to promote antibiotic stewardship in nursing homes are warranted.

Postdischarge antibiotic use for prophylaxis following spinal fusion

OBJECTIVE

Despite recommendations to discontinue prophylactic antibiotics after incision closure or <24 hours after surgery, prophylactic antibiotics are continued after discharge by some clinicians. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

This study included patients aged ≥18 years undergoing spinal fusion or refusion between July 2011 and June 2015 at 3 sites. Patients with an infection during the surgical admission were excluded.

METHODS

Prophylactic antibiotics were identified at discharge. Factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use were identified using hierarchical generalized linear models.

RESULTS

In total, 8,652 spinal fusion admissions were included. Antibiotics were prescribed at discharge in 289 admissions (3.3%). The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (22.1%), cephalexin (18.8%), and ciprofloxacin (17.1%). Adjusted for study site, significant factors associated with prophylactic discharge antibiotics included American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥3 (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.00-1.70), lymphoma (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.11-5.98), solid tumor (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 1.62-8.14), morbid obesity (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.09-2.47), paralysis (OR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.30-4.37), hematoma/seroma (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.17-7.33), thoracic surgery (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.01-1.93), longer length of stay, and intraoperative antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were uncommon after spinal fusion. Patient and perioperative factors were associated with continuation of prophylactic antibiotics after hospital discharge.

The appropriateness of antimicrobial use in the outpatient clinics of three hospitals in the Netherlands

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs commonly have an in-hospital focus. Little is known about the quality of antimicrobial use in hospital outpatient clinics. We investigated the extent and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions in the outpatient clinics of three hospitals.

METHODS

From June 2018 to January 2019, we performed ten point prevalence surveys in outpatient clinics of one university hospital and two large teaching hospitals. All prophylactic and therapeutic prescriptions were retrieved from the electronic medical records. Appropriateness was defined as being in accordance with guidelines. Furthermore, we investigated the extent to which the dose was adjusted to renal function and documentation of an antibiotic plan in the case notes.

RESULTS

We retrieved 720 prescriptions for antimicrobial drugs, of which 173 prescriptions (24%) were prophylactic. A guideline was present for 95% of prescriptions, of which the guideline non-adherence rate was 25.6% (n = 42/164) for prophylaxis and 43.1% (n = 224/520) for therapy. Of all inappropriate prescriptions (n = 266), inappropriate prescriptions for skin and soft tissue infections (n = 60/226) and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (n = 67/266) made up the largest proportion. In only 13 of 138 patients with impaired or unknown renal function the dosage regimen was adjusted. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was the drug for which most often renal function was not taken into account. In 94.6% of prescriptions the antibiotic plan was documented.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospital outpatient clinics, a substantial part of therapeutics were inappropriately prescribed. Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid was the most inappropriately prescribed drug, due to non-adherence to the guidelines and because dose adjustment to renal function was often not considered.

Appropriateness of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Practices in Australia

IMPORTANCE

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a common indication for antibiotic use in hospitals and is associated with high rates of inappropriateness.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the SAP prescribing practices and assess hospital, surgical, and patient factors associated with appropriate SAP prescribing.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Multicenter, national, quality improvement study with retrospective analysis of data collected from Australian hospitals via Surgical National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey audits from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2018. Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. Crude estimates of appropriateness were adjusted for factors included in the model by calculating estimated marginal means and presented as adjusted-appropriateness with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Adjusted appropriateness and factors associated with inappropriate prescriptions.

RESULTS

A total of 9351 surgical episodes and 15 395 prescriptions (10 740 procedural and 4655 postprocedural) were analyzed. Crude appropriateness of total prescriptions was 48.7% (7492 prescriptions). The adjusted appropriateness of each surgical procedure group was low for procedural SAP, ranging from 33.7% (95% CI, 26.3%-41.2%) for dentoalveolar surgery to 68.9% (95% CI, 63.2%-74.5%) for neurosurgery. The adjusted appropriateness of postprocedural prescriptions was also low, ranging from 21.5% (95% CI, 13.4%-29.7%) for breast surgery to 58.7% (95% CI, 47.9%-69.4%) for ophthalmological procedures. The most common reason for inappropriate procedural SAP was incorrect timing (44.9%), while duration greater than 24 hours was the most common reason for inappropriate postprocedural SAP (54.3%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

High rates of inappropriate procedural and postprocedural antimicrobial use were demonstrated across all surgical specialties. Reasons for inappropriateness, such as timing and duration, varied according to the type of SAP and surgical specialty. These findings highlight the need for improvement in SAP prescribing and suggest potential targeted areas for action.

Clostridium difficile Infection and Colorectal Surgery: Is There Any Risk?

Background and objectives: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is an important healthcare-associated infection, with important consequences both from a medical and financial point of view, but its correlation with anastomotic leaks after colorectal surgeries is scarcely reported in the literature. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study looking for patients who underwent open or laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancers between January 2012 and December 2017, excluding emergency surgeries for complicated colorectal tumors. We also examined patient history for risk factors for CDI such as age, sex, comorbidities, and clinical findings at admission or during hospital stay as well as tumor characteristics. Results: A total of 360 patients were included in the study, out of which 320 underwent surgeries that included anastomoses. There were 19 cases of anastomotic leaks, out of which 13 patients were diagnosed with CDI, with a statistic significance for association between CDI and anastomotic leakage (p < 0.0001). Most patients who developed both CDI and anastomotic leaks had left-sided resections or a type of rectal resection, while none of the patients with right-sided resections had this association, but with no statistical significance possibly due to the limited number of cases. Conclusions: CDI is a relevant risk factor and should be taken into consideration when trying to prevent anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for colon or rectal cancer. Thorough assessment of risk factors at admission should be mandatory in order to adequately prepare the patient and plan an optimal course of treatment. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and a multidisciplinary approach, with a team which should always include the surgeon, is mandatory when it comes to CDI prevention.

Antibiotic therapy in acute pancreatitis: From global overuse to evidence based recommendations

BACKGROUND

Unwarranted administration of antibiotics in acute pancreatitis presents a global challenge. The clinical reasoning behind the misuse is poorly understood. Our aim was to investigate current clinical practices and develop recommendations that guide clinicians in prescribing antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis.

METHODS

Four methods were used. 1) Systematic data collection was performed to summarize current evidence; 2) a retrospective questionnaire was developed to understand the current global clinical practice; 3) five years of prospectively collected data were analysed to identify the clinical parameters used by medical teams in the decision making process, and finally; 4) the UpToDate Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was applied to provide evidence based recommendations for healthcare professionals.

RESULTS

The systematic literature search revealed no consensus on the start of AB therapy in patients with no bacterial culture test. Retrospective data collection on 9728 patients from 22 countries indicated a wide range (31-82%) of antibiotic use frequency in AP. Analysis of 56 variables from 962 patients showed that clinicians initiate antibiotic therapy based on increased WBC and/or elevated CRP, lipase and amylase levels. The above mentioned four laboratory parameters showed no association with infection in the early phase of acute pancreatitis. Instead, procalcitonin levels proved to be a better biomarker of early infection. Patients with suspected infection because of fever had no benefit from antibiotic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors formulated four consensus statements to urge reduction of unjustified antibiotic treatment in acute pancreatitis and to use procalcitonin rather than WBC or CRP as biomarkers to guide decision-making.

Tactics to Prevent Intra-Abdominal Infections in General Surgery

BACKGROUND

Abdominal infections following surgery have many severe consequences. Several effective, well-evaluated infection prevention and control processes exist to avoid these infections.

METHODS

This manuscript reviews and provides supporting evidence for common management strategies useful to avoid postoperative abdominal infection.

RESULTS

Prevention of abdominal infection begins with preparation of the environment using standard infection control practices. Peri-operative use of systemic antibiotics, an antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery, and effective antiseptic preparation of the surgical site all reduce infection rates. Peri-operative supplemental oxygenation, maintenance of core body temperature, and physiologic euglycemia will reduce both incisional and organ-space infections in the abdominal surgery patient. Strategic use of irrigation and drain placement may be useful in some circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Specific methods of prevention are documented to reduce intra-abdominal infections. Prevention requires a multi-disciplinary team including the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and all operating room personnel.

Clostridium difficile Infection in Trauma, Surgery, and Medical Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) causes significant morbidity and mortality rates, especially for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data comparing trauma and surgery patients with CDI in the ICU with medical patients with CDI in the ICU are limited.

METHODS

In a single-center study, we analyzed retrospective data from 25 trauma patients and 13 surgery patients aged 18 years or older who had CDI and had been admitted to the ICU. A comparison group of 156 medical patients aged 18 years or greater who had CDI and were admitted to the ICU also was identified.

RESULTS

The trauma/surgery patients had a significantly higher mean number of ventilator days (13.5 ± 9.3 vs. 7.3 ± 7.2; p < 0.0004), Foley catheter days (11.9 ± 6.8 vs. 8.0 ± 7.9; p = 0.005), mean ICU length of stay (LOS) (12.34 ± 9.7 vs. 5.9 ± 5.9 days; p < 0.0003), and mean total LOS (16 ± 9.3 vs. 10.7 ± 8.4 days; p = 0.0008). However, the medical group had a significantly higher mean number of vasopressor days (2.07 ± 3.51) than the trauma/surgery group (0.58 ± 1.55; p < 0.0001). The overall survival rate was significantly higher in the trauma/surgery group than in the medical group (100% vs. 81%, respectively; p = 0.003). A higher percentage of patients in the trauma/surgery group received piperacillin/tazobactam before the diagnosis of CDI than the medical patients (58% vs. 37%, respectively; p = 0.02). The number of days that antibiotics were given prior to the development of CDI was greater in the trauma/surgery group than in the medical group (10.3 ± 6.7 vs. 7.6 ± 7.3 days; p = 0.04). Multiple logistic regression models determined ICU LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.27 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.41), the presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (aOR 3.44; 95% CI 1.19-9.95), and piperacillin/tazobactam use (aOR 3.27; 95% CI 1.24-8.65) to be positively associated with CDI in the trauma/surgery group compared with the medical patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Longer ICU stay, receipt of piperacillin/tazobactam, and having COPD were positively associated with CDI in trauma/surgery patients compared with medical patients. These findings suggest further consideration of the possibility of CDI should be given to patients admitted the surgical ICU for an extended period of time, receiving piperacillin/tazobactam, or having COPD. Additional evaluation of these factors in a larger patient sample is warranted.

Traumatic thoracic rib cage hernias: Operative management and proposal for a new anatomic-based grading system

BACKGROUND

Traumatic Rib Cage Hernias (TRCH) requiring operative repair are rare and there is currently no literature to guiding surgical management.

METHODS

Perioperative review of TRCH over 32 years. Five operative grades were developed based on extent of tissue/bone damage, size, and location.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients (20 blunt, 4 penetrating) underwent operative repair. Lung was the herniated organ in 88% with a median of 4 rib fractures and average size of 60.25 cm. Types of operation were well clustered by assigned TRCH grade. The majority required mesh (75%) and/or rib plating (79%). Complex tissue flap reconstruction was required in 10%. Full range-of-motion was maintained in 88% with79% returning to pre-injury activity levels. Five patients had continued pain at final follow up (mean = 7months).

CONCLUSION

The size and degree of injury has important implications in the optimal surgical management of TRCHs. These operative grades effectively direct surgical care for these rare and complex injuries.