1
|
Delory T, Maillard A, Tubach F, Böelle PY, Bouvet E, Lariven S, Jeanmougin P, Le Bel J. Appropriateness of intended antibiotic prescribing using clinical case vignettes in primary care, and related factors. Eur J Gen Pract 2024; 30:2351811. [PMID: 38766775 PMCID: PMC11107848 DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2024.2351811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care have been poorly explored. In particular, the impact of computerised decision-support systems (CDSS) remains unknown. OBJECTIVES We aim at investigating the uptake of CDSS and its association with physician characteristics and professional activity. METHODS Since May 2022, users of a CDSS for antibiotic prescribing in primary care in France have been invited, when registering, to complete three case vignettes assessing clinical situations frequently encountered in general practice and identified as at risk of antibiotic misuse. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing was defined as the rate of answers in line with the current guidelines, computed by individuals and by specific questions. Physician's characteristics associated with individual appropriate antibiotic prescribing (< 50%, 50-75% and > 75% appropriateness) were identified by multivariate ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS In June 2023, 60,067 physicians had registered on the CDSS. Among the 13,851 physicians who answered all case vignettes, the median individual appropriateness level of antibiotic prescribing was 77.8% [Interquartile range, 66.7%-88.9%], and was < 50% for 1,353 physicians (10%). In the multivariate analysis, physicians' characteristics associated with appropriateness were prior use of the CDSS (OR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.56-1.87), being a general practitioner vs. other specialist (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.20-1.49), working in primary care (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27), mentoring students (OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.21) age (OR = 0.69 per 10 years increase, 95% CI 0.67-0.71). CONCLUSION Individual appropriateness for antibiotic prescribing was high among CDSS users, with a higher rate in young general practitioners, previously using the system. CDSS could improve antibiotic prescribing in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tristan Delory
- Antibioclic Steering Committee, France
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France
- Clinical Trial Unit, Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois, Epagny Metz-Tessy, France
| | | | - Florence Tubach
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France
- Département de Santé Publique, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Yves Böelle
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d’Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, IPLESP, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Josselin Le Bel
- Antibioclic Steering Committee, France
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM, IAME, Paris, France
- Département de médecine générale, Université Paris Cité, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harrigan JJ, Hamilton KW, Cressman L, Bilker WB, Degnan KO, David MZ, Tran D, Pegues DA, Dutcher L. Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns for Respiratory Tract Illnesses Following the Conclusion of an Education and Feedback Intervention in Primary Care. Clin Infect Dis 2024; 78:1120-1127. [PMID: 38271275 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A study previously conducted in primary care practices found that implementation of an educational session and peer comparison feedback was associated with reduced antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTDs). Here, we assess the long-term effects of this intervention on antibiotic prescribing following cessation of feedback. METHODS RTD encounters were grouped into tiers based on antibiotic prescribing appropriateness: tier 1, almost always indicated; tier 2, possibly indicated; and tier 3, rarely indicated. A χ2 test was used to compare prescribing between 3 time periods: pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention (14 months following cessation of feedback). A mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between period and prescribing. RESULTS We analyzed 260 900 RTD encounters from 29 practices. Antibiotic prescribing was more frequent in the post-intervention period than in the intervention period (28.9% vs 23.0%, P < .001) but remained lower than the 35.2% pre-intervention rate (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, the odds of prescribing were higher in the post-intervention period than the intervention period for tier 2 (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.30; P < .05) and tier 3 (OR, 1.20; 95% CI: 1.12-1.30) indications but was lower compared to the pre-intervention period for each tier (OR, 0.66; 95% CI: 0.59-0.73 tier 2; OR, 0.68; 95% CI: 0.61-0.75 tier 3). CONCLUSIONS The intervention effects appeared to last beyond the intervention period. However, without ongoing provider feedback, there was a trend toward increased prescribing. Future studies are needed to determine optimal strategies to sustain intervention effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James J Harrigan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Keith W Hamilton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leigh Cressman
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Warren B Bilker
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kathleen O Degnan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael Z David
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - David A Pegues
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lauren Dutcher
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Perez R, Yarrington ME, Deri CR, Smith MJ, Hayes J, Wrenn RH, Moehring RW. Teams in Transition: Increasing Role of Advanced Practice Providers in Antimicrobial Use and Infectious Diseases Consultation. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae141. [PMID: 38577030 PMCID: PMC10993059 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Advanced practice providers (APPs) have taken on increasing responsibilities as primary team members in acute care hospitals, but the impact of this practice shift on antimicrobial prescribing and infectious diseases (ID) consultation requests is unknown. Here we describe longitudinal trends in antimicrobial days of therapy (DOT) and ID consultation by attributed provider type in 3 hospitals. Methods We performed a retrospective time series analysis of antimicrobial use and ID consultation from July 2015 to June 2022 at a major university hospital and 2 community hospitals. We evaluated antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation over time and assessed attribution to 3 groups of providers: attending physicians, trainees, and APPs. We used multinomial logistic regression to measure changes in percentage of DOT and ID consultation across the clinician groups over time using physicians as the referent. Results Baseline distribution of antimicrobial DOT and ID consultation varied by practice setting, but all subgroups showed increases in the proportion attributable to APPs. Large increases were seen in the rate of ID consultation, increasing by >30% during the study period. At our university hospital, by study end >40% of new ID consults and restricted antimicrobial days were attributed to APPs. Conclusions Hospitals had differing baseline patterns of DOT attributed to provider groups, but all experienced increases in DOT attributed to APPs. Similar increases were seen in changes to ID consultation. APPs have increasing involvement in antimicrobial use decisions in the inpatient setting and should be engaged in future antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinaldo Perez
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael E Yarrington
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Connor R Deri
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael J Smith
- Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jillian Hayes
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebekah H Wrenn
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebekah W Moehring
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Department of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baillie EJ, Merlo G, Van Driel ML, Magin PJ, Hall L. Early-career general practitioners' antibiotic prescribing for acute infections: a systematic review. J Antimicrob Chemother 2024; 79:512-525. [PMID: 38252922 PMCID: PMC10904722 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance is a worldwide threat, exacerbated by inappropriate prescribing. Most antibiotic prescribing occurs in primary care. Early-career GPs are important for the future of antibiotic prescribing and curbing antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVES To determine antibiotic prescribing patterns by early-career GPs for common acute infections. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase and Scopus. Two authors independently screened abstracts and full texts for inclusion. Primary outcomes were antibiotic prescribing rates for common acute infections by GPs with experience of 10 years or less. Secondary outcomes were any associations between working experience and antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS Of 1483 records retrieved, we identified 41 relevant studies. Early-career GPs were less likely to prescribe antibiotics compared with their more experienced colleagues (OR range 0.23-0.67). Their antibiotic prescribing rates for 'any respiratory condition' ranged from 14.6% to 52%, and for upper respiratory tract infections from 13.5% to 33%. Prescribing for acute bronchitis varied by country, from 15.9% in Sweden to 26% in the USA and 63%-73% in Australia. Condition-specific data for all other included acute infections, such as sinusitis and acute otitis media, were limited to the Australian context. CONCLUSIONS Early-career GPs prescribe fewer antibiotics than later-career GPs. However, there are still significant improvements to be made for common acute conditions, as their prescribing is higher than recommended benchmarks. Addressing antimicrobial resistance requires an ongoing worldwide effort and early-career GPs should be the target for long-term change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J Baillie
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Greg Merlo
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mieke L Van Driel
- General Practice Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Parker J Magin
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
- GP Training Research Department, Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Hall
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zimmet AN, Ha D, Mui E, Smith M, Hawkins M, Alegria W, Holubar M. "Electronic Phenotyping" Antimicrobials to Facilitate Outpatient Stewardship for Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infection in Renal Transplant. Open Forum Infect Dis 2024; 11:ofae119. [PMID: 38533270 PMCID: PMC10964979 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in renal transplant are important antimicrobial stewardship targets but are difficult to identify within electronic medical records. We validated an "electronic phenotype" of antibacterials prescribed for these indications. This may be more useful than billing data in assessing antibiotic indication in this outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex N Zimmet
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - David Ha
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Emily Mui
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Mary Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Marten Hawkins
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - William Alegria
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Marisa Holubar
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
- Stanford Antimicrobial Safety and Sustainability Program, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Serletti L, Dutcher L, Degnan KO, Szymczak JE, Cluzet V, David MZ, Cressman L, Glassman LW, Hamilton KW. Analysis of seasonal variation of antibiotic prescribing for respiratory tract diagnoses in primary care practices. ANTIMICROBIAL STEWARDSHIP & HEALTHCARE EPIDEMIOLOGY : ASHE 2023; 3:e147. [PMID: 37771744 PMCID: PMC10523546 DOI: 10.1017/ash.2023.418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/30/2023]
Abstract
Objective To determine antibiotic prescribing appropriateness for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTD) by season. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Primary care practices in a university health system. Patients Patients who were seen at an office visit with diagnostic code for RTD. Methods Office visits for the entire cohort were categorized based on ICD-10 codes by the likelihood that an antibiotic was indicated (tier 1: always indicated; tier 2: sometimes indicated; tier 3: rarely indicated). Medical records were reviewed for 1,200 randomly selected office visits to determine appropriateness. Based on this reference standard, metrics and prescriber characteristics associated with inappropriate antibiotic prescribing were determined. Characteristics of antibiotic prescribing were compared between winter and summer months. Results A significantly greater proportion of RTD visits had an antibiotic prescribed in winter [20,558/51,090 (40.2%)] compared to summer months [11,728/38,537 (30.4%)][standardized difference (SD) = 0.21]. A significantly greater proportion of winter compared to summer visits was associated with tier 2 RTDs (29.4% vs 23.4%, SD = 0.14), but less tier 3 RTDs (68.4% vs 74.4%, SD = 0.13). A greater proportion of visits in winter compared to summer months had an antibiotic prescribed for tier 2 RTDs (80.2% vs 74.2%, SD = 0.14) and tier 3 RTDs (22.9% vs 16.2%, SD = 0.17). The proportion of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing was higher in winter compared to summer months (72.4% vs 62.0%, P < .01). Conclusions Increases in antibiotic prescribing for RTD visits from summer to winter were likely driven by shifts in diagnoses as well as increases in prescribing for certain diagnoses. At least some of this increased prescribing was inappropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lacey Serletti
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lauren Dutcher
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kathleen O. Degnan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Julia E. Szymczak
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Valerie Cluzet
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Nuvance Health, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
| | - Michael Z. David
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leigh Cressman
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Keith W. Hamilton
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Medvedeva N, Ong’uti S, Hersh AL, Chang A, Mui E, Stenehjem E, Ha D, Holubar M. Validity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision in the Urgent Care Setting and Impact on Antibiotic Prescribing Rates. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad010. [PMID: 36751646 PMCID: PMC9897297 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
We validated different coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Edition (ICD-10) encounter definitions across 2 urgent care clinics. Sensitivity of definitions varied throughout the pandemic. Inclusion of COVID-19 and COVID-19-like illness (CLI) ICD-10s rendered highest sensitivity but lowest specificity. Antibiotic prescribing rates were low for COVID-19 ICD-10 encounters, increasing with CLI ICD-10 encounters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia Medvedeva
- Correspondence: Natalia Medvedeva, MD, 300 Pasteur Drive Lane Bldg., Room L123 MC5107, Stanford, CA, USA 94304 (). Sharon Ong’uti, MD, MPH, 1161 21st Avenue South, A2200 MCN, Nashville, TN, USA 37232 ()
| | - Sharon Ong’uti
- Correspondence: Natalia Medvedeva, MD, 300 Pasteur Drive Lane Bldg., Room L123 MC5107, Stanford, CA, USA 94304 (). Sharon Ong’uti, MD, MPH, 1161 21st Avenue South, A2200 MCN, Nashville, TN, USA 37232 ()
| | - Adam L Hersh
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Amy Chang
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Emily Mui
- Department of Quality, Patient Safety and Effectiveness, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Edward Stenehjem
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Epidemiology, Intermountain Healthcare, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - David Ha
- Department of Quality, Patient Safety and Effectiveness, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA,Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Marisa Holubar
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA,Department of Quality, Patient Safety and Effectiveness, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Simon M, Thilly N, Pereira O, Pulcini C. Factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotics prescribed in French general practice: a cross-sectional study using reimbursement databases. Clin Microbiol Infect 2021; 28:609.e1-609.e6. [PMID: 34500079 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Identifying characteristics associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions is useful to guide antibiotic stewardship interventions. Proxy indicators estimating the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions at the general practitioner (GP) level have recently been validated. Our objectives were to identify (a) clusters of GPs according to their appropriateness score based on these proxy indicator results, and (b) GPs', patients' and practices' characteristics associated with inappropriate prescriptions. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional observational study analysing antibiotics prescribed by GPs in one large French region in 2019, using the Health Insurance databases. We identified clusters of GPs according to their appropriateness score calculated from ten proxy indicators' results. We then analysed the association between the clusters with more inappropriate practices compared with the one with less inappropriate practices, and GPs', patients', and practices' characteristics. We performed bivariate and multivariable analyses using logistic polytomous regressions. RESULTS We included 4819 GPs who were grouped into three clusters. GPs who belong to the clusters with more inappropriate practices were more likely to practice in certain geographical area, to be male, not to have a particular medical practice, to be practicing for longer, to have more patients and consultations, to have a higher proportion of elderly patients, and to prescribe more drugs, more antibiotics and a higher proportion of broad-spectrum antibiotics. CONCLUSION We identified clusters of practice as well as factors associated with the appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions, using routinely collected data. This might help to guide antibiotic stewardship interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maïa Simon
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France
| | - Nathalie Thilly
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Département Méthodologie, Promotion, Investigation, Nancy, France
| | - Ouarda Pereira
- Direction Régionale du Service Médical (DRSM) Grand Est, Strasbourg, France
| | - Céline Pulcini
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, Nancy, France; Université de Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Département de Maladies Infectieuses, Nancy, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dutcher L, Degnan K, Adu-Gyamfi AB, Lautenbach E, Cressman L, David MZ, Cluzet V, Szymczak JE, Pegues DA, Bilker W, Tolomeo P, Hamilton KW. Improving Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections in Primary Care; a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:947-956. [PMID: 34212177 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is common in primary care (PC), particularly for respiratory tract diagnoses (RTDs). However, the optimal approach for improving prescribing remains unknown. METHODS We conducted a stepped-wedge study in PC practices within a health system to assess the impact of a provider-targeted intervention on antibiotic prescribing for RTDs. RTDs were grouped into tiers based on appropriateness of antibiotic prescribing: tier 1 (almost always indicated), tier 2 (may be indicated), and tier 3 (rarely indicated). Providers received education on appropriate RTD prescribing followed by monthly peer comparison feedback on antibiotic prescribing for (1) all tiers and (2) tier 3 RTDs. Chi-squared testing was used to compare the proportion of visits with antibiotic prescriptions before and during the intervention. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the intervention and antibiotic prescribing. RESULTS Across 30 PC practices and 185,755 total visits, overall antibiotic prescribing was reduced with the intervention, from 35.2% to 23.0% of visits (p<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the intervention was associated with a reduced odds of antibiotic prescription for tiers 2 (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.52 - 0.62) and 3 (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.53 - 0.61), but not for tier 1 (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.83 - 1.16). CONCLUSION A provider-focused intervention reduced overall antibiotic prescribing for RTDs without affecting prescribing for infections that likely require antibiotics. Future research should examine the sustainability of such interventions, potential unintended adverse effects on patient health or satisfaction, and provider perceptions and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Dutcher
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Kathleen Degnan
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Ebbing Lautenbach
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Leigh Cressman
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Michael Z David
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.,Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Valerie Cluzet
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Health Quest, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
| | - Julia E Szymczak
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David A Pegues
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Warren Bilker
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Pam Tolomeo
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Keith W Hamilton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|