Acetylcholinesterase in infective-stage larvae of Haemonchus contortus, Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis resistant and susceptible to benzimidazole anthelmintics

Ivermectin resistant and susceptible third-stage larvae of Haemonchus contortus: cholinesterase and phosphatase activities

Cholinesterase and acid phosphatase (AP), but not alkaline phosphatase activities, were detected in cytosolic and membrane-bound fractions of ivermectin resistant and susceptible Haemonchus contortus infective-stage larvae. Some differences in acetylcholinesterase activity of cytosolic fractions and in the AP activity of these fractions as well as in the response to AP inhibitors by membrane-bound fractions were detected. Data are discussed.

Cholinesterase and phosphatase activities in adults and infective-stage larvae of levamisole-resistant and levamisole-susceptible isolates of Haemonchus contortus

Cholinesterase (ChE) and acid phosphatase (AP) activities, but not alkaline phosphatase activities, were detected in cytosolic and membrane-bound fractions of adult and infective-stage larvae of levamisole-resistant and levamisole-susceptible Haemonchus contortus. In contrast to other gastrointestinal nematodes, the ChE activity was higher in L3 than in adults and, in both cases, was mainly associated with membranes. ChE activity was inhibited by Triton X-100 and was only detected in membrane-bound fractions when the detergent was removed. Differences between resistant and susceptible L3 were observed in the response to inhibitors (cytosolic fraction) and in the enzymatic content (membrane-bound fraction). Phosphatase activity was detected at acidic pH in all fractions, being higher in the adult than in the L3 stage. In the former, most of the enzyme was localized in the membrane-bound fractions, whereas in the latter it was mainly in cytosolic fractions. This difference could be correlated with the activity in the gut. In inhibition assays, a difference between cytosolic fractions from resistant and susceptible adults was observed in their response to 1 mmol/L tartaric acid.

Comparison of six in vitro tests in determining benzimidazole and levamisole resistance in Haemonchus contortus and Ostertagia circumcincta of sheep

Six in vitro methods for the detection of anthelmintic resistance were compared using benzimidazole/levamisole-resistant Haemonchus contortus and benzimidazole/levamisole/ivermectin-resistant Ostertagia circumcincta as well as susceptible strains of both parasite species. The degree of resistance to thiabendazole and levamisole was compared by (1) an egg hatch assay, (2) an egg hatch paralysis assay, (3) a larval development assay, (4) a larval paralysis assay (5) a larval paralysis assay with physostigmine and (6) larval micromotility assay. The degree of resistance for each assay was expressed as resistance factor--RF. For the detection of thiabendazole and levamisole resistance, the larval development test was observed as the most sensitive to measure quantitatively a degree of resistance between susceptible and resistant strains. For this test the RF for thiabendazole and levamisole was 14.3 and >32.5, respectively in H. contortus strains and 21.1 and 3.5 in strains of O. circumcincta. Egg hatch assay was also found to be sensitive and accurate in determining of resistance to benzimidazole. For measurement of levamisole resistance the egg hatch paralysis assay and larval paralysis assay were found to be able to distinguish between strains, but some disadvantages of these techniques make it unsuitable for field detection of levamisole resistance. Other in vitro assays as larval paralysis assay with physostigmine and larval micromotility assay were also investigated. Significant differences in paralysis of the larvae were observed using larval paralysis assay.

Physiology of two strains of Trichostrongylus colubriformis resistant and susceptible to thiabendazole and mucosal response of experimentally infected rabbits

Two strains of Trichostrongylus colubriformis of ovine origin, one resistant and one susceptible to thiabendazole, were compared during experimental infection in rabbits. Groups of rabbits were infected with 5000 infective larvae (L3) of either the resistant or the susceptible strain. On days 21 and 42 post-infection (p.i.), 5 rabbits of each group were killed and the small intestine divided into three sections for worm counts and histological or biochemical analysis. Faecal egg counts were performed twice a week from day 15 to day 42 p.i. The physiology of the worms was characterised by in vitro acetylcholinesterase secretion of adult worms. The host inflammatory response was determined by peroxidase activity in mucosal homogenates and by histological counts of mast cells and eosinophils. Infectivity was not significantly different between the two strains. However, egg production was delayed and was significantly lower for the resistant strain. Conversely, in vitro secretion of resistant worms was significantly higher than the susceptible ones. The mucosal homogenetates of rabbits infected with the resistant strain had significantly higher levels of peroxidase activity in the duodenum on days 21 and 42 p.i. Mast cell counts were also significantly higher in the duodenum on day 42 p.i., in rabbits infected with the resistant strain. No difference was observed in the eosinophil counts. These results suggest that genetic variation in the nematode, such as anthelminthic resistance, is associated with variations in worm biology and physiology as well as differences in the inflammatory response of the host.