1
|
Thommes E, Coudeville L, Muhammad R, Martin M, Nelson CB, Chit A. Public health impact and cost-effectiveness of implementing a 'pre-vaccination screening' strategy with the dengue vaccine in Puerto Rico. Vaccine 2022; 40:7343-7351. [PMID: 36347720 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended 'pre-vaccination screening' as its preferred implementation strategy when using the licensed dengue vaccine (CYD-TDV; Dengvaxia, Sanofi), so that only individuals with previous dengue infection are vaccinated. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended use of CYD-TDV to prevent dengue in children with previous laboratory-confirmed dengue infection in regions where dengue is endemic. Here, we evaluate the public health impact and cost-effectiveness of a 'pre-vaccination screening' strategy in Puerto Rico. METHODS The current analysis builds upon a previously published transmission model used to assess the benefits/risks associated with dengue vaccination. For 'pre-vaccination screening', three alternative testing methods were assessed: one using an immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) dengue serotest, another with dengue serotesting using a rapid diagnostic test (RDT), and one using both sequentially (as recommended in Puerto Rico). The time horizon considered was 10 years. RESULTS In Puerto Rico, the disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted for 'pre-vaccination screening' with an ELISA-based program, RDT-based program, and both sequentially would be a median 1,192 (95% CI: 716-2,232), 2,812 (95% CI: 1,579-5,019), and 1,017 (95% CI: 561-1,738), respectively. These benefits would arise from the reduction in cases: median 24,961 (95% CI: 17,480-36,782), 58,273 (95% CI: 40,729-84,796), 20,775 (95% CI: 14,637-30,374) fewer cases, respectively. The cost per DALY averted from a payer perspective would be US$12,518 (95 %CI: US$4,749-26,922), US$10,047 (95% CI: US$3,350-23,852), and US$12,334 (95% CI: US$4,965-26,444), respectively. All three strategies would be cost saving from a societal perspective. CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the WHO and CDC 'pre-vaccination screening' guidance for CYD-TDV implementation. In Puerto Rico, regardless of the testing strategy and even with a relatively low rate of testing, it would be cost-effective from a payer perspective and cost saving from a societal perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Thommes
- Sanofi, 1755 Steeles Avenue W, Toronto, Ontario M2R 3T4, Canada; University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada; York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada.
| | | | | | - Maria Martin
- Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18370, USA.
| | | | - Ayman Chit
- Sanofi, 1 Discovery Drive, Swiftwater, PA 18370, USA; Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nymark LS, Miller A, Vassall A. Inclusion of Additional Unintended Consequences in Economic Evaluation: A Systematic Review of Immunization and Tuberculosis Cost-Effectiveness Analyses. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2021; 5:587-603. [PMID: 33948928 PMCID: PMC8096359 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-021-00269-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to review economic evaluations of immunization and tuberculosis to determine the extent to which additional unintended consequences were taken into account in the analysis and to describe the methodological approaches used to estimate these, where possible. METHODS We sourced the vaccine economic evaluations from a previous systematic review by Nymark et al. (2009-2015) and searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase from 2015 to 2019 using the same search strategy. For tuberculosis economic evaluations, we extracted studies from 2009 to 2019 that were published in a previous review by Siapka et al. We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidance. Studies were classified according to the categories and subcategories (e.g., herd immunity, non-specific effects, and labor productivity) defined in a framework identifying additional unintended consequences by Nymark and Vassall. Where possible, methods for estimating the additional unintended consequences categories and subcategories were described. We evaluated the reporting quality of included studies according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) extraction guideline. RESULTS We identified 177 vaccine cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) between 2009 and 2019 that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 98 included unintended consequences. Of the total 98 CEAs, overall health consequence categories were included 73 times; biological categories: herd immunity 43 times; pathogen response: resistance 15 times; and cross-protection 15 times. For health consequences pertaining to the supply-side (health systems) categories, side effects were included five times. On the nonhealth demand side (intrahousehold), labor productivity was included 60 times. We identified 29 tuberculosis CEAs from 2009 to 2019 that met the inclusion criteria. Of these, six articles included labor productivity, four included indirect transmission effects, and one included resistance. Between 2009 and 2019, only 34% of tuberculosis CEAs included additional unintended consequences, compared with 55% of vaccine CEAs. CONCLUSIONS The inclusion of additional unintended consequences in economic evaluations of immunization and tuberculosis continues to be limited. Additional unintended consequences of economic benefits, such as those examined in this review and especially those that occur outside the health system, offer valuable information to analysts. Further work on appropriate ways to value these additional unintended consequences is still warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liv Solvår Nymark
- Department of Global Health, The Academic Medical Center (AMC), The University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Anna Vassall
- Department of Global Health, The Academic Medical Center (AMC), The University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muniyandi M, Karikalan N, Ravi K, Sengodan S, Krishnan R, Tyagi K, Rajsekar K, Raju S, Selvavinayagam TS. An economic evaluation of implementing a decentralized dengue screening intervention under the National Vector Borne Disease Control Programme in Tamil Nadu, South India. Int Health 2021; 14:295-308. [PMID: 34453836 PMCID: PMC9070504 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lack of effective early screening is a major obstacle for reducing the fatality rate and disease burden of dengue. In light of this, the government of Tamil Nadu has adopted a decentralized dengue screening strategy at the primary healthcare (PHC) facilities using blood platelet count. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of a decentralized screening strategy for dengue at PHC facilities compared with the current strategy at the tertiary health facility (THC) level. Methods Decision tree analysis followed a hypothetical cohort of 1000 suspected dengue cases entering the model. The cost-effectiveness analysis was performed at a 3% discount rate for the proposed and current strategy. The outcomes are expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life years gained. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were done to check the uncertainty in the outcome. Results The proposed strategy was found to be cost-saving and ICER was estimated to be −41 197. PSA showed that the proposed strategy had a 0.84 probability of being an economically dominant strategy. Conclusions The proposed strategy is cost-saving, however, it is recommended to consider optimal population coverage, costs to economic human resources and collateral benefits of equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malaisamy Muniyandi
- Scientist-D & Head, Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 60003, India
| | - Nagarajan Karikalan
- Scientist-D & Head, Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 60003, India
| | - Karunya Ravi
- Scientist-D & Head, Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 60003, India
| | - Senthilkumar Sengodan
- Scientist-D & Head, Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 60003, India
| | - Rajendran Krishnan
- Scientist-D & Head, Department of Health Economics, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, No. 1, Sathyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai 60003, India
| | - Kirti Tyagi
- Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2nd Floor, IRCS Building, 1, Red Cross Road, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Kavitha Rajsekar
- Department of Health Research, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, 2nd Floor, IRCS Building, 1, Red Cross Road, New Delhi 110001, India
| | - Sivadhas Raju
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, 359, Anna Salai, Chokkalingam Nagar, Teynampet, Chennai 600006, India
| | - T S Selvavinayagam
- Department of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Government of Tamil Nadu, 359, Anna Salai, Chokkalingam Nagar, Teynampet, Chennai 600006, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fongwen N, Wilder-Smith A, Gubler DJ, Ooi EE, T. Salvana EM, de Lamballerie X, Olliaro PL, Peeling RW. Target product profile for a dengue pre-vaccination screening test. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2021; 15:e0009557. [PMID: 34324505 PMCID: PMC8320982 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
With increasing geographic spread, frequency, and magnitude of outbreaks, dengue continues to pose a major public health threat worldwide. Dengvaxia, a dengue live-attenuated tetravalent vaccine, was licensed in 2015, but post hoc analyses of long-term data showed serostatus-dependent vaccine performance with an excess risk of hospitalized and severe dengue in seronegative vaccine recipients. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended that only persons with evidence of past dengue infection should receive the vaccine. A test for pre-vaccination screening for dengue serostatus is needed. To develop the target product profile (TPP) for a dengue pre-vaccination screening test, face-to-face consultative meetings were organized with follow-up regional consultations. A technical working group was formed to develop consensus on a reference test against which candidate pre-vaccination screening tests could be compared. The group also reviewed current diagnostic landscape and the need to accelerate the evaluation, regulatory approval, and policy development of tests that can identify seropositive individuals and maximize public health impact of vaccination while avoiding the risk of hospitalization in dengue-naive individuals. Pre-vaccination screening strategies will benefit from rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) that are affordable, sensitive, and specific and can be used at the point of care (POC). The TPP described the minimum and ideal characteristics of a dengue pre-vaccination screening RDT with an emphasis on high specificity. The group also made suggestions for accelerating access to these RDTs through streamlining regulatory approval and policy development. Risk and benefit based on what can be achieved with RDTs meeting minimal and optimal characteristics in the TPP across a range of seroprevalences were defined. The final choice of RDTs in each country will depend on the performance of the RDT, dengue seroprevalence in the target population, tolerance of risk, and cost-effectiveness. This paper describes the consensus on the minimum and ideal performance and operational characteristics of rapid tests that would be used for dengue pre-vaccination screening. This profile will incentivize industry to develop better pre-vaccination screening tests. The choice of which test to use depends on the seroprevalence of the population targeted for vaccination and the optimal balance between benefit and risks. The group also made suggestions for accelerating access to these pre-vaccination screening tests through streamlining regulatory approval and policy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noah Fongwen
- International Diagnostics Centre, Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Annelise Wilder-Smith
- Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Germany
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
| | - Duane J. Gubler
- Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Eng Eong Ooi
- Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Edsel Maurice T. Salvana
- Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines
| | - Xavier de Lamballerie
- Unité des Virus Emergents (UVE), Aix Marseille Université, IRD 190, INSERM 1207, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France
| | - Piero L. Olliaro
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Rosanna W. Peeling
- International Diagnostics Centre, Department of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carta A, Conversano C. On the Use of Markov Models in Pharmacoeconomics: Pros and Cons and Implications for Policy Makers. Front Public Health 2020; 8:569500. [PMID: 33194969 PMCID: PMC7661756 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.569500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We present an overview of the main methodological features and the goals of pharmacoeconomic models that are classified in three major categories: regression models, decision trees, and Markov models. In particular, we focus on Markov models and define a semi-Markov model on the cost utility of a vaccine for Dengue fever discussing the key components of the model and the interpretation of its results. Next, we identify some criticalities of the decision rule arising from a possible incorrect interpretation of the model outcomes. Specifically, we focus on the difference between median and mean ICER and on handling the willingness-to-pay thresholds. We also show that the life span of the model and an incorrect hypothesis specification can lead to very different outcomes. Finally, we analyse the limit of Markov model when a large number of states is considered and focus on the implementation of tools that can bypass the lack of memory condition of Markov models. We conclude that decision makers should interpret the results of these models with extreme caution before deciding to fund any health care policy and give some recommendations about the appropriate use of these models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Carta
- Department of Business and Economics, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Claudio Conversano
- Department of Business and Economics, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
HTA flourishing in Asia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2019; 35:411-412. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462319000758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|