1
|
Gomes M, Turner AJ, Sammon C, Dawoud D, Ramagopalan S, Simpson A, Siebert U. Acceptability of Using Real-World Data to Estimate Relative Treatment Effects in Health Technology Assessments: Barriers and Future Steps. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:623-632. [PMID: 38369282 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence about the comparative effects of new treatments is typically collected in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In some instances, RCTs are not possible, or their value is limited by an inability to capture treatment effects over the longer term or in all relevant population subgroups. In these cases, nonrandomized studies (NRS) using real-world data (RWD) are increasingly used to complement trial evidence on treatment effects for health technology assessment (HTA). However, there have been concerns over a lack of acceptability of this evidence by HTA agencies. This article aims to identify the barriers to the acceptance of NRS and steps that may facilitate increases in the acceptability of NRS in the future. METHODS Opinions of the authorship team based on their experience in real-world evidence research in academic, HTA, and industry settings, supported by a critical assessment of existing studies. RESULTS Barriers were identified that are applicable to key stakeholder groups, including HTA agencies (eg, the lack of comprehensive methodological guidelines for using RWD), evidence generators (eg, avoidable deviations from best practices), and external stakeholders (eg, data controllers providing timely access to high-quality RWD). Future steps that may facilitate future acceptability of NRS include improvements in the quality, integration, and accessibility of RWD, wider use of demonstration projects to highlight the value and applicability of nonrandomized designs, living, and more detailed HTA guidelines, and improvements in HTA infrastructure relating to RWD. CONCLUSION NRS can represent a crucial source of evidence on treatment effects for use in HTA when RCT evidence is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Gomes
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, England, UK
| | | | | | - Dalia Dawoud
- Science, Policy and Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, England, UK; Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | | | - Alex Simpson
- Global Access, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT TIROL - University for Health Sciences and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Austria; Center for Health Decision Science and Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Institute for Technology Assessment and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang WW, Juan YC, Wu GHM, Pwu RF. The Critical Intersect of Regulations, Health Technology Assessment, and Drug Safety Assessments. Drug Saf 2024; 47:289-299. [PMID: 38113017 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01386-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) is a multidisciplinary process that determines the value of health technology at different points in its lifecycle. Safety issues have become more important since regulatory authorities are increasingly adopting flexible standards, processes, and evidentiary requirements for drug approval. In this article, we compared the different role of regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. Additionally, the experience of regulatory-HTA collaboration for assessment and/or decision-making on safety issues in the lifecycle of a health technology is illustrated, including olmesartan (angiotensin II receptor antagonist) and the direct-acting hepatitis C virus (HCV) antiviral agents. Post-licensing data can be derived from various sources such as electronic health records, medical claims, drug and disease registries, post-authorization safety studies (PASS) or post-authorization safety efficacy studies (PAES), periodic benefit-risk assessment reports, as well as HTA reassessment reports, which incorporate utilization information from patients in a real-world setting and provide crucial evidence for various purposes. With the ongoing accumulation of safety and efficacy information during post-regulatory approval, a standardized process for continuous data collection and active reassessment of risk and benefit becomes crucial for managing the lifecycle of health technologies. In order to define evidence requirements clearly, reduce uncertainty, and minimize delays in HTA approval, early engagement and collaboration of HTA agencies in the regulatory review processes have become more common. However, there is currently limited interaction and collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies. This article aims to identify the challenges faced by regulators and HTA agencies today, emphasizing the significance of conducting regulatory reviews and health technology assessments throughout a technology's lifecycle, underlining the value of utilizing real-world data and evidence, and emphasizing the necessity of enhancing collaboration between regulatory authorities and HTA agencies, all within the overarching context of drug safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Wen Yang
- Data Science Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 242062, Taiwan, R.O.C
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Yi-Chen Juan
- National Taiwan University Hospital-Integrative Medical Database, Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Grace Hui-Min Wu
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C
- Department of Physical Therapy and Assistive Technology, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C
| | - Raoh-Fang Pwu
- Data Science Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, No. 510, Zhongzheng Rd., Xinzhuang Dist., New Taipei City, 242062, Taiwan, R.O.C..
- Health Outcomes and Technology Teaching and Education Alliance, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C..
- School of Health Care Administration, Taipei Medical University, Taipei City, Taiwan, R.O.C..
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maas L, Joos A, Hiligsmann M. Pediatric Market Access: A Qualitative Study. Ther Innov Regul Sci 2024; 58:336-346. [PMID: 38172379 PMCID: PMC10850165 DOI: 10.1007/s43441-023-00601-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This qualitative study aims to analyze current PM regulation and market access requirements and proposes potential solutions to mitigate current challenges. METHODS Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with experts from pharmaceutical industry, regulatory authorities, national health technology assessment (HTA) bodies, pediatricians, and academia from the Netherlands (NL), Germany (DE), the United Kingdom (UK), and France (FR) to get insight into the pediatric research, the regulatory and reimbursement processes, challenges, and solutions. Themes for further testing were developed on how to facilitate pediatric market access. Atlas.ti 9 was used to analyze the findings. RESULTS Heterogeneity in requirements for the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and HTA approvals are noted. By example, DE grants direct reimbursement after regulatory approval, the other countries require additional reimbursement which generate delays and challenges in patient access after marketing authorization. Key components in facilitating PM market access include multi-stakeholder collaboration, transparency, patient representatives, informed consent guidance, real-world evidence, and appropriate clinical trial designs. Pricing models based on the economic capabilities of individual countries could further reduce delays and challenges in market access. The additional specific pediatric incentives should be taken as best practice to encourage innovation in pediatric conditions. CONCLUSION This study highlights differences in requirements for regulatory and reimbursement approval, along with international differences in pricing and reimbursement procedures for pediatric market access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lieke Maas
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Angelika Joos
- Global Regulatory Policy, Merck Research Laboratories, MSD (Europe) Inc., Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mickael Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zisis K, Pavi E, Geitona M, Athanasakis K. Real-world data: a comprehensive literature review on the barriers, challenges, and opportunities associated with their inclusion in the health technology assessment process. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY & PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES : A PUBLICATION OF THE CANADIAN SOCIETY FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, SOCIETE CANADIENNE DES SCIENCES PHARMACEUTIQUES 2024; 27:12302. [PMID: 38481726 PMCID: PMC10932954 DOI: 10.3389/jpps.2024.12302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to assess the current use and acceptance of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) in health technology assessment (HTA) process. It additionally aimed to discern stakeholders' viewpoints concerning RWD and RWE in HTA and illuminate the obstacles, difficulties, prospects, and consequences associated with the incorporation of RWD and RWE into the realm of HTA. Methods: A comprehensive PRISMA-based systematic review was performed in July 2022 in PubMed/Medline, Scopus, IDEAS-RePEc, International HTA database, and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination with ad hoc supplementary search in Google Scholar and international organization websites. The review included pre-determined inclusion criteria while the selection of eligible studies, the data extraction process and quality assessment were carried out using standardized and transparent methods. Results: Twenty-nine (n = 29) studies were included in the review out of 2,115 studies identified by the search strategy. In various global contexts, disparities in RWD utilization were evident, with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) serving as the primary evidence source. RWD and RWE played pivotal roles, surpassing relative effectiveness assessments (REAs) and significantly influencing decision-making and cost-effectiveness analyses. Identified challenges impeding RWD integration into HTA encompassed limited local data access, complexities in non-randomized trial design, data quality, privacy, and fragmentation. Addressing these is imperative for optimal RWD utilization. Incorporating RWD/RWE in HTA yields multifaceted advantages, enhancing understanding of treatment efficacy, resource utilization, and cost analysis, particularly via patient registries. RWE complements assessments of advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) and rare diseases. Local data utilization strengthens HTA, bridging gaps when RCT data is lacking. RWD aids medical device decision-making, cancer drug reassessment, and indirect treatment comparisons. Challenges include data availability, stakeholder acceptance, expertise, and privacy. However, standardization, training, collaboration, and guidance can surmount these barriers, fostering enhanced RWD utilization in HTA. Conclusion: This study highlights the intricate global landscape of RWD and RWE acceptance in HTA. Recognizing regional nuances, addressing methodological challenges, and promoting collaboration are pivotal, among others, for leveraging RWD and RWE effectively in healthcare decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Zisis
- Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment (LabHTA), Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
- Institute for Health Economics, Athens, Greece
| | - Elpida Pavi
- Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment (LabHTA), Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| | - Mary Geitona
- Department of Social and Educational Policy, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Peloponnese, Corinth, Greece
| | - Kostas Athanasakis
- Laboratory for Health Technology Assessment (LabHTA), Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dayer VW, Drummond MF, Dabbous O, Toumi M, Neumann P, Tunis S, Teich N, Saleh S, Persson U, von der Schulenburg JMG, Malone DC, Salimullah T, Sullivan SD. Real-world evidence for coverage determination of treatments for rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2024; 19:47. [PMID: 38326894 PMCID: PMC10848432 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03041-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Health technology assessment (HTA) decisions for pharmaceuticals are complex and evolving. New rare disease treatments are often approved more quickly through accelerated approval schemes, creating more uncertainties about clinical evidence and budget impact at the time of market entry. The use of real-world evidence (RWE), including early coverage with evidence development, has been suggested as a means to support HTA decisions for rare disease treatments. However, the collection and use of RWE poses substantial challenges. These challenges are compounded when considered in the context of treatments for rare diseases. In this paper, we describe the methodological challenges to developing and using prospective and retrospective RWE for HTA decisions, for rare diseases in particular. We focus attention on key elements of study design and analyses, including patient selection and recruitment, appropriate adjustment for confounding and other sources of bias, outcome selection, and data quality monitoring. We conclude by offering suggestions to help address some of the most vexing challenges. The role of RWE in coverage and pricing determination will grow. It is, therefore, necessary for researchers, manufacturers, HTA agencies, and payers to ensure that rigorous and appropriate scientific principles are followed when using RWE as part of decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria W Dayer
- CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | | | - Omar Dabbous
- Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Bannockburn, IL, USA
| | - Mondher Toumi
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | - Shadi Saleh
- American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Ulf Persson
- The Swedish Institute for Health Economics, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Daniel C Malone
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Sean D Sullivan
- CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brönneke JB, Herr A, Reif S, Stern AD. Dynamic HTA for digital health solutions: opportunities and challenges for patient-centered evaluation. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2023; 39:e72. [PMID: 37973549 DOI: 10.1017/s0266462323002726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Germany's 2019 Digital Healthcare Act (Digitale-Versorgung-Gesetz, or DVG) created a number of opportunities for the digital transformation of the healthcare delivery system. Key among these was the creation of a reimbursement pathway for patient-centered digital health applications (digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, or DiGA). Worldwide, this is the first structured pathway for "prescribable" health applications at scale. As of October 10, 2023, 49 DiGA were listed in the official directory maintained by Germany's Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM); these are prescribable by physicians and psychotherapists and reimbursed by the German statutory health insurance system for all its 73 million beneficiaries. Looking ahead, a major challenge facing DiGA manufacturers will be the generation of the evidence required for ongoing price negotiations and reimbursement. Current health technology assessment (HTA) methods will need to be adapted for DiGA. METHODS We describe the core issues that distinguish HTA in this setting: (i) explicit allowance for more flexible research designs, (ii) the nature of initial evidence generation, which can be delivered (in its final form) up to one year after becoming reimbursable, and (iii) the dynamic nature of both product development and product evaluation. We present the digital health applications in the German DiGA scheme as a case study and highlight the role of RWE in the successful evaluation of DiGA on an ongoing basis. RESULTS When a DiGA is likely to be updated and assessed regularly, full-scale RCTs are infeasible; we therefore make the case for using real-world data and real-world evidence (RWE) for dynamic HTAs. CONCLUSIONS Continous evaluation using RWD is a regulatory innovation that can help improve the quality of DiGAs on the market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan B Brönneke
- Health Innovation Hub of the German Federal Ministry of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Herr
- Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Simon Reif
- ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany
- University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ariel D Stern
- Harvard Business School, Health Innovation Hub of the German Federal Ministry of Health, Hasso Plattner Institute, Digital Health Cluster, Harvard-MIT Center for Regulatory Science, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farrington AD, Frøstrup AG, Dahl P. The Value and Deliverables of Medical Affairs: Affiliate Perspectives and Future Expectations. Pharmaceut Med 2023; 37:417-424. [PMID: 37789114 PMCID: PMC10587308 DOI: 10.1007/s40290-023-00501-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023]
Abstract
The Medical Affairs (MA) function in pharmaceutical companies creates a unique opportunity to ensure the internal linkage between Research & Development (R&D) and Commercial/Marketing functions, in addition to managing external scientific engagements with multiple stakeholders across life-science ecosystems. In recognition of the strategic value of MA, the objective of this paper is to share a comprehensive set of practical examples of the main deliverables within the MA function in the affiliate and align these with the two distinct phases; pre- and post-launch, respectively. We believe that an information gap currently exists in the available literature on these matters addressing practical aspects and examples beyond visionary, strategic thinking. Based on this contribution, further opportunities within MA can be discussed. In addition, we share our thoughts and considerations on future advancements in the role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Palle Dahl
- AstraZeneca A/S, Medical Affairs, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Morland K, Gerges C, Elwing J, Visovatti SH, Weatherald J, Gillmeyer KR, Sahay S, Mathai SC, Boucly A, Williams PG, Harikrishnan S, Minty EP, Hobohm L, Jose A, Badagliacca R, Lau EMT, Jing Z, Vanderpool RR, Fauvel C, Leonidas Alves J, Strange G, Pulido T, Qian J, Li M, Mercurio V, Zelt JGE, Moles VM, Cirulis MM, Nikkho SM, Benza RL, Elliott CG. Real-world evidence to advance knowledge in pulmonary hypertension: Status, challenges, and opportunities. A consensus statement from the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative's Real-world Evidence Working Group. Pulm Circ 2023; 13:e12317. [PMID: 38144948 PMCID: PMC10739115 DOI: 10.1002/pul2.12317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This manuscript on real-world evidence (RWE) in pulmonary hypertension (PH) incorporates the broad experience of members of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute's Innovative Drug Development Initiative Real-World Evidence Working Group. We aim to strengthen the research community's understanding of RWE in PH to facilitate clinical research advances and ultimately improve patient care. Herein, we review real-world data (RWD) sources, discuss challenges and opportunities when using RWD sources to study PH populations, and identify resources needed to support the generation of meaningful RWE for the global PH community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kellie Morland
- Global Medical AffairsUnited Therapeutics CorporationResearch Triangle ParkNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Christian Gerges
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of CardiologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
| | - Jean Elwing
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiOhioUSA
| | - Scott H. Visovatti
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Jason Weatherald
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary MedicineUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
| | - Kari R. Gillmeyer
- The Pulmonary CenterBoston University Chobian & Avedisian School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
- Center for Healthcare Organization & Implementation ResearchVA Bedford Healthcare System and VA Boston Healthcare SystemBedfordMassachusettsUSA
| | - Sandeep Sahay
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep MedicineHouston Methodist HospitalHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Stephen C. Mathai
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineJohns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Athénaïs Boucly
- Faculté de MédecineUniversité Paris‐SaclayLe Kremlin‐BicêtreFrance
- Service de Pneumologie et Soins Intensifs Respiratoires, Centre de Référence de l'Hypertension Pulmonaire, Hôpital BicêtreAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de ParisLe Kremlin BicêtreFrance
- National Heart and Lung InstituteImperial CollegeLondonUK
| | - Paul G. Williams
- Center of Chest Diseases & Critical CareMilpark HospitalJohannesburgSouth Africa
| | | | - Evan P. Minty
- Department of Medicine & O'Brien Institute for Public HealthUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
| | - Lukas Hobohm
- Department of CardiologyUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
- Center for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (CTH)University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
| | - Arun Jose
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep MedicineUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiOhioUSA
| | - Roberto Badagliacca
- Department of Clinical, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of RomePoliclinico Umberto IRomeItaly
| | - Edmund M. T. Lau
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Prince Alfred HospitalUniversity of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
- Faculty of Medicine and HealthUniversity of SydneyCamperdownNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Zhi‐Cheng Jing
- State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingChina
| | | | - Charles Fauvel
- Service de Cardiologie, Centre de Compétence en Hypertension Pulmonaire 27/76, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Charles Nicolle, INSERM EnVI U1096Université de RouenRouenFrance
| | - Jose Leonidas Alves
- Pulmonary Division, Heart InstituteUniversity of São Paulo Medical SchoolSão PauloBrazil
| | - Geoff Strange
- School of MedicineThe University of Notre Dame AustraliaPerthWestern AustraliaAustralia
| | - Tomas Pulido
- Ignacio Chávez National Heart InstituteMéxico CityMexico
| | - Junyan Qian
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC‐DID), Ministry of Science & Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMinistry of EducationBeijingChina
| | - Mengtao Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Dermatologic and Immunologic Diseases (NCRC‐DID), Ministry of Science & Technology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH), Key Laboratory of Rheumatology and Clinical ImmunologyMinistry of EducationBeijingChina
| | - Valentina Mercurio
- Department of Translational Medical SciencesFederico II UniversityNaplesItaly
| | - Jason G. E. Zelt
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
| | - Victor M. Moles
- Division of Cardiovascular MedicineUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborMichiganUSA
| | - Meghan M. Cirulis
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineIntermountain Medical Center MurraySalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| | | | - Raymond L. Benza
- Mount Sinai HeartIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - C. Gregory Elliott
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of UtahSalt Lake CityUtahUSA
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineIntermountain Medical Center MurraySalt Lake CityUtahUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alves da Costa F, Cardoso Borges F, Ramos A, Mayer A, Brito C, Ramos C, Bernardo C, Cossito M, Furtado C, Ferreira AR, Martins-Branco D, da Costa Miranda A, Lourenço A. Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice. Breast Cancer Res 2023; 25:78. [PMID: 37386484 PMCID: PMC10308630 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2. METHODS A population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used. RESULTS There were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%). CONCLUSIONS Data suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipa Alves da Costa
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal.
- Research Institute for Medicines (iMED), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Fábio Cardoso Borges
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Adriana Ramos
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Alexandra Mayer
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Claudia Brito
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Ramos
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Catarina Bernardo
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Mariane Cossito
- Direção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Cláudia Furtado
- Direção de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde, Autoridade Nacional do Medicamento e Produtos de Saúde, I.P. (INFARMED I.P.), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Arlindo R Ferreira
- Unidade de Mama, Centro Clínico Champalimaud, Fundação Champalimaud, Lisbon, Portugal
- Católica Medical School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Diogo Martins-Branco
- Serviço de Oncologia Médica, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institute Jules Bordet, Rue Meylemeersch 90, 1070, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ana da Costa Miranda
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - António Lourenço
- Registo Oncológico Nacional (RON), Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, EPE, Lisbon, Portugal
- NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Haruna UA, Musa SS, Manirambona E, Musa II, Lucero-Prisno DE. Real-world evidence: What is it and why does it matter to pharmacists? CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GLOBAL HEALTH 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
|
11
|
Saesen R, Kantidakis G, Marinus A, Lacombe D, Huys I. How do cancer clinicians perceive real-world data and the evidence derived therefrom? Findings from an international survey of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:969778. [PMID: 36091761 PMCID: PMC9449152 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.969778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The role of real-world evidence (RWE) in the development of anticancer therapies has been gradually growing over time. Regulators, payers and health technology assessment agencies, spurred by the rise of the precision medicine model, are increasingly incorporating RWE into their decision-making regarding the authorization and reimbursement of novel antineoplastic treatments. However, it remains unclear how this trend is viewed by clinicians in the field. This study aimed to investigate the opinions of these stakeholders with respect to RWE and its suitability for informing regulatory, reimbursement-related and clinical decisions in oncology.Methods: An online survey was disseminated to clinicians belonging to the network of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer between May and July 2021.Results: In total, 557 clinicians across 30 different countries participated in the survey, representing 13 distinct cancer domains. Despite seeing the methodological challenges associated with its interpretation as difficult to overcome, the respondents mostly (75.0%) perceived RWE positively, and believed such evidence could be relatively strong, depending on the designs and data sources of the studies from which it is produced. Few (4.6%) saw a future expansion of its influence on decision-makers as a negative evolution. Furthermore, nearly all (94.0%) participants were open to the idea of sharing anonymized or pseudonymized electronic health data of their patients with external parties for research purposes. Nevertheless, most clinicians (77.0%) still considered randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be the gold standard for generating clinical evidence in oncology, and a plurality (49.2%) thought that RWE cannot fully address the knowledge gaps that remain after a new antitumor intervention has entered the market. Moreover, a majority of respondents (50.7%) expressed that they relied more heavily on RCT-derived evidence than on RWE for their own decision-making.Conclusion: While cancer clinicians have positive opinions about RWE and want to contribute to its generation, they also continue to hold RCTs in high regard as sources of actionable evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robbe Saesen
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Robbe Saesen,
| | - Georgios Kantidakis
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ann Marinus
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Denis Lacombe
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy Research Unit, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Can we use existing guidance to support the development of robust real-world evidence for health technology assessment/payer decision-making? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2022; 38:e79. [DOI: 10.1017/s0266462322000605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Advances in the digitization of health systems and expedited regulatory approvals of innovative treatments have led to increased potential for the use of real-world data (RWD) to generate real-world evidence (RWE) to complement evidence from clinical trials. However, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers have concerns about the ability to generate RWE of sufficient quality to be pivotal evidence of relative treatment effectiveness. Consequently, there is a growing need for HTA bodies and payers to develop guidance for the industry and other stakeholders about the use of RWD/RWE to support access, reimbursement, and pricing. We therefore sought to (i) understand barriers to the use of RWD/RWE by HTA bodies and payers; (ii) review potential solutions in the form of published guidance; and (iii) review findings with selected HTA/payer bodies. Four themes considered key to shaping the generation of robust RWE for HTA bodies and payers were identified as: (i) data (availability, governance, and quality); (ii) methodology (design and analytics); (iii) trust (transparency and reproducibility); and (iv) policy and partnerships. A range of guidance documents were found from trusted sources that could address these themes. These were discussed with HTA experts. This commentary summarizes the potential guidance solutions available to help resolve issues faced by HTA decision-makers in the adoption of RWD/RWE. It shows that there is alignment among stakeholders about the areas that need improvement in the development of RWE and that the key priority to move forward is better collaboration to make data usable for multiple purposes.
Collapse
|
13
|
McNair D, Lumpkin M, Kern S, Hartman D. Use of RWE to Inform Regulatory, Public Health Policy, and Intervention Priorities for the Developing World. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2021; 111:44-51. [PMID: 34655224 PMCID: PMC9298255 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
For low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) to benefit from real‐world evidence (RWE)/real‐world data (RWD) in both product registration (“regulatory”) decision making and in product utilization policy (“policy”) decision making, they need to overcome several challenges. They need to deploy more electronic health records systems (EHRs), adjust for confounder variables, build trust between stakeholders, and create laws and regulations for local generation of data that are assented for secondary use. The role of procurers and their use of RWE/RWD in the LMIC context likewise is in a state of ongoing development. Procurers of health products are strong players currently in the “access” chain as LMICs continue to work on strengthening governmental health technology assessment (HTA) bodies. Procurers’ use of RWE is presently at an early stage and is mostly indirect, leveraging RWE results that are produced by researchers in high‐income countries (HICs), often under considerably different regulatory and policy objectives and constraints compared to LMICs’ epidemiology and priorities. Pending wider deployment of EHRs and other RWE sources, stakeholders must realize that populations from HIC RWE (i) can be devised to closely resemble phenotypic patterns in LMIC populations and (ii) can be analyzed to align with LMICs’ unmet needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas McNair
- Global Health, Integrated Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Murray Lumpkin
- Global Health, Integrated Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Steven Kern
- Global Health, Integrated Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Daniel Hartman
- Global Health, Integrated Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
De Maria Marchiano R, Di Sante G, Piro G, Carbone C, Tortora G, Boldrini L, Pietragalla A, Daniele G, Tredicine M, Cesario A, Valentini V, Gallo D, Babini G, D’Oria M, Scambia G. Translational Research in the Era of Precision Medicine: Where We Are and Where We Will Go. J Pers Med 2021; 11:216. [PMID: 33803592 PMCID: PMC8002976 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11030216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of Precision Medicine has globally revolutionized the approach of translational research suggesting a patient-centric vision with therapeutic choices driven by the identification of specific predictive biomarkers of response to avoid ineffective therapies and reduce adverse effects. The spread of "multi-omics" analysis and the use of sensors, together with the ability to acquire clinical, behavioral, and environmental information on a large scale, will allow the digitization of the state of health or disease of each person, and the creation of a global health management system capable of generating real-time knowledge and new opportunities for prevention and therapy in the individual person (high-definition medicine). Real world data-based translational applications represent a promising alternative to the traditional evidence-based medicine (EBM) approaches that are based on the use of randomized clinical trials to test the selected hypothesis. Multi-modality data integration is necessary for example in precision oncology where an Avatar interface allows several simulations in order to define the best therapeutic scheme for each cancer patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruggero De Maria Marchiano
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Section of General Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy or (R.D.M.M.); (M.T.)
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (M.D.); or (G.S.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
| | - Gabriele Di Sante
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Section of General Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy or (R.D.M.M.); (M.T.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
| | - Geny Piro
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Carmine Carbone
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Tortora
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Medical Oncology, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Section of Oncology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonella Pietragalla
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Unità di Medicina Traslazionale per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gennaro Daniele
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Unità di Medicina Traslazionale per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Tredicine
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Section of General Pathology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy or (R.D.M.M.); (M.T.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
| | - Alfredo Cesario
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (M.D.); or (G.S.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, UOC Radioterapia Oncologica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Institute of di Radiology, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Daniela Gallo
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Unità di Medicina Traslazionale per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Babini
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Unità di Medicina Traslazionale per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Marika D’Oria
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (M.D.); or (G.S.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Scientific Direction, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (A.C.); (M.D.); or (G.S.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center—Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy; (G.P.); (C.C.); or (G.T.); (L.B.); (A.P.); (G.D.); or (V.V.); or (D.G.); (G.B.)
- Unità di Medicina Traslazionale per la Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna, del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento Universitario Scienze della Vita e Sanità Pubblica, Sezione di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|