Value of transferring embryos derived from monopronucleated (1PN) zygotes at the time of fertilization assessment

Could blastocysts derived from abnormal fertilized zygotes be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Current guidelines advise against using embryos derived from mono-pronuclei (1PN) or non-pronuclei (0PN) zygotes for clinical purposes. Nevertheless, recent studies have demonstrated that 1PN and 0PN zygotes can lead to healthy births. This study aimed to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of 1PN and 0PN blastocysts.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched up to 14 March 2024. Eligible studies enrolled participants transferring 0PN or 1PN blastocysts, with two pronuclei (2PN) blastocysts used as the control. Clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate and live birth rate were the main outcomes. The results were presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) using random-effect models with the Mantel-Haenszel method. Additionally, a stratified analysis was conducted based on the type of fertilization. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.

Results

In total, 270 articles were identified, with 16 ultimately included in the meta-analysis. In total, 57,835 cycles were analysed: 1071 cycles in the 1PN group, 2324 cycles in the 0PN group, and 54,440 cycles in the 2PN group. The results indicated that 1PN or 0PN blastocysts were associated with lower clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates than 2PN blastocysts. Interestingly, there was no significant difference in live birth rate between 1PN blastocysts and 2PN blastocysts in patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), nor between 0PN blastocysts and 2PN blastocysts in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

Conclusion

Careful consideration should be given to the utilization of 1PN and 0PN blastocysts, especially if an improved methodology of non-invasive assessment of fertilization is available. At the very least, 1PN blastocysts in patients undergoing ICSI and 0PN blastocysts in patients undergoing IVF represent viable fertility options for patients facing abnormal fertilization in clinical practice.

The Istanbul Consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment† ‡

This European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE)/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine (ALPHA) consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer. A previous ALPHA/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed. A working group consisting of ALPHA members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment. The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented ALPHA and eight members represented ESHRE, along with two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the ALPHA Executive Committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee. This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote and embryo assessment. Based on the duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness. Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations. This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

The Istanbul consensus update: a revised ESHRE/ALPHA consensus on oocyte and embryo static and dynamic morphological assessment†,‡

STUDY QUESTION

What are the current recommended criteria for morphological assessment of oocytes, zygotes, and embryos?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The present ESHRE/Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine consensus document provides several novel recommendations to assess oocyte and embryo morphology and rank embryos for transfer.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

A previous Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine/ESHRE consensus on oocyte and embryo morphological assessment was published in 2011. After more than a decade, and the integration of time-lapse technology into embryo culture and assessment, a thorough review and update was needed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A working group consisting of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine executive committee members and ESHRE Special interest group of Embryology members formulated recommendations on oocyte and embryo assessment.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The working group included 17 internationally recognized experts with extensive experience in clinical embryology. Seven members represented Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and eight members represented ESHRE, along with to two methodological experts from the ESHRE central office. Based on a systematic literature search and discussion of existing evidence, the recommendations of the Istanbul Consensus (2011) were reassessed and, where appropriate, updated based on consensus within the working group. A stakeholder review was organized after the updated draft was finalized. The final version was approved by the working group, the Alpha executive committee and the ESHRE Executive Committee.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This updated consensus paper provides 20 recommendations focused on the timeline of preimplantation developmental events and morphological criteria for oocyte, zygote, and embryo assessment. Based on duration of embryo culture, recommendations are given on the frequency and timing of assessments to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Several criteria relevant to oocyte and embryo morphology have not been well studied, leading to either a recommendation against their use for grading or for their use in ranking rather than grading. Future updates may require further revision of these recommendations.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This document provides embryologists with advice on best practices when assessing oocyte and embryo quality based on the most recent evidence.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The consensus meeting and writing of the paper were supported by funds from ESHRE and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The working group members did not receive any payment. G.C. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter and Cooper Surgical. A.C. declared text book royalties (Mastering Clinical Embryology, published 2024), consulting fees from Cooper Surgical, Gedeon Richter and TMRW Life Sciences, honoraria for lectures from Merck, Ferring, and Gedeon Richter, and participation in the HFEA Scientific Advances Committee; she also disclosed being treasurer and vice-president of Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, a shareholder in Care Fertility Limited and Fertile Mind Limited, and having stock options in TMRW Life Sciences and U-Ploid Biotechnology Ltd. L.R. declared consulting fees from Organon, payments or honoraria for lectures from Merck, Organon, IBSA, Finox, Geden Richter, Origio, Organon, Ferring, Fundation IVI; she also disclosed being a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of IVIRMA (Paid) and a member of the Advisory Scientific Board of Nterilizer (unpaid). I.S. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical, and stock options from Alife Health. M.A. declared payments or honoraria for lectures from Vitrolife and support for attending meetings from Vitrolife and Cooper Surgical (both unrelated to this manuscript). The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the consensus views of the members of this working group based on the scientific evidence available at the time of the meeting. GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.

Nonpronuclear- and Monopronuclear-derived Blastocysts Do Not Impair Subsequent Perinatal and Maternal Outcomes

CONTEXT

The routine clinical practice is to prioritize the transfer of blastocysts derived from 2 pronuclei (2PN) embryos if they are available. For women who only have blastocysts resulting from nonpronuclear (0PN) and monopronuclear (1PN) embryos, whether to transfer these embryos or discard them has been an ongoing debate over the years.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perinatal and obstetric outcomes following the transfer of vitrified-warmed single blastocysts derived from 0PN and 1PN zygotes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

University-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

PATIENT(S)

This study included singletons born to women who had undergone 0PN and 1PN vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers, compared to those resulting from 2PN vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers from 2012 to 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Perinatal and obstetric outcomes.

RESULT(S)

A total of 7284 women were included in the final analysis. Of these, 386, 316, and 6582 cycles resulted from 0PN-, 1PN-, and 2PN-derived blastocysts transfer, respectively. The rates of clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth were similar across the study cohorts in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses. When comparing the 0PN and 2PN groups, no differences were found in birth outcomes after adjusting for confounders. Similarly, maternal complications and mode of delivery were comparable between these 2 study cohorts. Birth parameters were also similar between the 1PN and 2PN blastocyst groups, except for more male births in the 1PN cohort. Furthermore, a comparison between the 1PN and 2PN groups did not reveal any significant differences in maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that the transfer of 0PN and 1PN blastocysts did not compromise reproductive outcomes or increase maternal and perinatal complications. This information is valuable for clinicians to counsel couples effectively and guide them in making informed decisions.

Are the number of nucleolar precursor body and size of pronuclear correlated with embryo development and ploidy status in 1PN zygotes?: an analysis through the time-lapse monitoring and pre-implantation genetic testing

This study aimed to demonstrate the utilization value of 1PN embryos. The 1PN zygotes collected from December 2021 to September 2022 were included in this study. The embryo development, the pronuclear characteristics, and the genetic constitutions were investigated. The overall blastocyst formation and good-quality blastocyst rates in 1PN zygotes were 22.94 and 16.24%, significantly lower than those of 2PN zygotes (63.25 and 50.23%, respectively, P = 0.000). The pronuclear characteristics were found to be correlated with the developmental potential. When comparing 1PN zygotes that developed into blastocysts to those that arrested, the former exhibited a significantly larger area (749.49 ± 142.77 vs. 634.00 ± 119.05, P = 0.000), a longer diameter of pronuclear (29.81 ± 3.08 vs. 27.30 ± 3.00, P = 0.000), and a greater number of nucleolar precursor body (NPB) (11.56 ± 3.84 vs. 7.19 ± 2.73, P = 0.000). Among the tested embryos, the diploidy euploidy rate was significantly higher in blastocysts in comparison with the arrested embryos (66.67 vs. 11.76%, P = 0.000), which was also significantly higher in IVF-1PN blastocysts than in ICSI-1PN blastocysts (75.44 vs. 25.00%, P = 0.001). However, the pronuclear characteristics were not found to be linked to the chromosomal ploidy once they formed blastocysts.In summary, while the developmental potential of 1PN zygotes is reduced, our study shows that, in addition to the reported pronuclear area and diameter, the number of NPB is also associated with their developmental potential. The 1PN blastocysts exhibit a high diploidy euploidy rate, are recommend to be clinically used post genetic testing, especially for patients who do not have other 2PN embryos available.

Reassessing the conventional fertilization check: leveraging preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to increase the number of transferrable embryos

RESEARCH QUESTION

Are some non-2PN zygotes normally fertilized, euploid and thus available for transfer?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patient data from 1214 PGT-A cycles from a single private IVF clinic. A total of 152 non-2PN embryos were assessed by PGT-A with parent of origin assessment, and were compared with 4822 2PN embryos assessed by PGT-A. Transfer outcomes of euploid embryos were then compared.

RESULTS

Over 40% of the tested non-2PN embryos were euploid. The 152 non-2PN (89 ICSI, 63 IVF), embryos were 2×0PN, 50×1PN, 24×2.1PN, 65×3PN, 9×4PN and 2×5PN. Of 4822 2PN embryos, 4737 (98.2%) were diploid, 1.4% polyploid and 0.4% haploid. Embryos resulting from 1PN zygotes were more likely to be haploid, and embryos resulting from 3PN and 4PN zygotes were more likely to be polyploid (P < 0.001). A total of 44 out of 89 (50%) ICSI embryos were either haploid or polyploid, significantly higher than those derived from IVF (16/63 [25.4%], P = 0.004). Maternal origin of polyploidy was more common in ICSI cases (P = 0.005). A total of 42% of the 93 diploid non-2PN embryos were also euploid, with diploid blastocysts from non-2PN zygotes likely to be euploid as those from diploid 2PN zygotes (P = 0.10). Twelve euploid 1PN, 2.1PN and 3PN embryos were transferred; two ongoing pregnancies and four live births have been reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach extends the use of PGT-A in identifying more embryos available for transfer, has the potential to increase cumulative pregnancy rates and questions the value of the fertilization check.

An expert opinion on rescuing atypically pronucleated human zygotes by molecular genetic fertilization checks in IVF

IVF laboratories routinely adopt morphological pronuclear assessment at the zygote stage to identify abnormally fertilized embryos deemed unsuitable for clinical use. In essence, this is a pseudo-genetic test for ploidy motivated by the notion that biparental diploidy is required for normal human life and abnormal ploidy will lead to either failed implantation, miscarriage, or significant pregnancy complications, including molar pregnancy and chorionic carcinoma. Here, we review the literature associated with ploidy assessment of human embryos derived from zygotes displaying a pronuclear configuration other than the canonical two, and the related pregnancy outcome following transfer. We highlight that pronuclear assessment, although associated with aberrant ploidy outcomes, has a low specificity in the prediction of abnormal ploidy status in the developing embryo, while embryos deemed abnormally fertilized can yield healthy pregnancies. Therefore, this universal strategy of pronuclear assessment invariably leads to incorrect classification of over 50% of blastocysts derived from atypically pronucleated zygotes, and the systematic disposal of potentially viable embryos in IVF. To overcome this limitation of current practice, we discuss the new preimplantation genetic testing technologies that enable accurate identification of the ploidy status of preimplantation embryos and suggest a progress from morphology-based checks to molecular fertilization check as the new gold standard. This alternative molecular fertilization checking represents a possible non-incremental and controversy-free improvement to live birth rates in IVF as it adds to the pool of viable embryos available for transfer. This is especially important for the purposes of 'family building' or for poor-prognosis IVF patients where embryo numbers are often limited.

Birth of Thirty-Two Healthy Babies Following Transfer of Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Embryos Derived from Monopronuclear Zygotes: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Fertilized zygotes normally display two pronuclei (PN), but abnormal fertilization patterns (0, 1 or >2PN) are observed daily in IVF labs. Multiple PN zygotes (>2) are generally discarded due to an increased risk of aneuploidy. However, the decision to transfer or not transfer 1PN-derived embryos remains controversial. The aims of our study were to analyze the neonatal outcomes of fresh or frozen-thawed embryos derived from 1PN zygotes, and to evaluate the influence of the fertilization method. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from cycles performed between January 2018 and December 2022. Fresh cycles were analyzed for the comparative fate of 1PN zygotes (n = 1234) following conventional in vitro fertilization (cIVF; n = 648) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; n = 586), as well as the results of the 64 transfers of 1PN-derived embryos (pregnancy rate (PR) and neonatal outcomes). This pregnancy follow-up was also applied to 167 transfers of frozen-thawed 1PN-derived embryos. Results: In fresh cycles, 46% of the 1PN zygotes in the cIVF group developed into embryos of sufficient quality to be transferred or frozen (day 3 or 5/6). This rate was lower in the fresh ICSI cycles (33%). Blastulation rate was also significantly higher in the cIVF group (44%) in comparison to the ICSI group (20%). The fresh single embryo transfers (32 per group) allowed seven pregnancies in the cIVF group (PR = 21.9%) as compared to four pregnancies in the ICSI group (PR = 12.5%). In the cIVF group, five deliveries of healthy newborns were achieved, but only one in the ICSI group. In frozen/thawed cycles, 36 pregnancies were obtained out of the 167 transfers. A non-significant difference was observed between embryos derived from cIVF cycles (PR = 26%) and ICSI cycles (PR = 16%) with 18 and 8 healthy babies born, respectively. Conclusions: We observed better outcomes for 1PN zygotes in cIVF cycles in comparison to ICSI cycles. Our center policy to transfer good-quality 1PN-derived embryos allowed the birth of 32 healthy babies.

The construction of machine learning-based predictive models for high-quality embryo formation in poor ovarian response patients with progestin-primed ovarian stimulation

OBJECTIVE

To explore the optimal models for predicting the formation of high-quality embryos in Poor Ovarian Response (POR) Patients with Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) using machine learning algorithms.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 4,216 POR cycles who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) / intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at Sichuan Jinxin Xinan Women and Children's Hospital from January 2015 to December 2021. Based on the presence of high-quality cleavage embryos 72 h post-fertilization, the samples were divided into the high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 1950) and the non-high-quality cleavage embryo group (N = 2266). Additionally, based on whether high-quality blastocysts were observed following full blastocyst culture, the samples were categorized into the high-quality blastocyst group (N = 124) and the non-high-quality blastocyst group (N = 1800). The factors influencing the formation of high-quality embryos were analyzed using logistic regression. The predictive models based on machine learning methods were constructed and evaluated accordingly.

RESULTS

Differential analysis revealed that there are statistically significant differences in 14 factors between high-quality and non-high-quality cleavage embryos. Logistic regression analysis identified 14 factors as influential in forming high-quality cleavage embryos. In models excluding three variables (retrieved oocytes, MII oocytes, and 2PN fertilized oocytes), the XGBoost model performed slightly better (AUC = 0.672, 95% CI = 0.636-0.708). Conversely, in models including these three variables, the Random Forest model exhibited the best performance (AUC = 0.788, 95% CI = 0.759-0.818). In the analysis of high-quality blastocysts, significant differences were found in 17 factors. Logistic regression analysis indicated that 13 factors influence the formation of high-quality blastocysts. Including these variables in the predictive model, the XGBoost model showed the highest performance (AUC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.741-0.884).

CONCLUSION

We developed a predictive model for the formation of high-quality embryos using machine learning methods for patients with POR undergoing treatment with the PPOS protocol. This model can help infertility patients better understand the likelihood of forming high-quality embryos following treatment and help clinicians better understand and predict treatment outcomes, thus facilitating more targeted and effective interventions.

Clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed blastocysts from zygotes with no or one pronucleus for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles

PURPOSE

To investigate the clinical outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers derived from zygotes with no (0PN) or one pronucleus (1PN).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 7084 0PN, 2238 1PN, and 72,266 two pronuclear (2PN) embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage from 19,631 IVF and 12,377 ICSI cycles between March 2018 and December 2021. Developmental potential and clinical outcomes of 0PN, 1PN, and 2PN embryos were analyzed. A total of 290 0PN-, 92 1PN-, and 1906 2PN-derived single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers were performed. Chromosome euploid rates of 0PN-, 1PN-, and 2PN-derived blastocysts were analyzed by next-generation sequencing. Euploid 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts underwent subsequent Infinium Asian Screening Array gene chip analysis to detect ploidy alterations.

RESULTS

Available blastocyst rates of 0PN and 1PN embryos were significantly lower than those of 2PN embryos in both IVF and ICSI cycles. Single 0PN and 1PN blastocysts transferred in frozen-thawed cycles resulted in a similar clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, and neonatal outcome to 2PN blastocysts in IVF and ICSI cycles. Genetic analysis showed that euploid rates of 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts used for ICSI cycles were similar to that of 2PN-derived blastocysts.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicated that 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts resulted in similar clinical outcomes to 2PN-derived blastocysts. The 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts from ICSI cycles can be transferred as well as those from IVF cycles when the number of 2PN-derived blastocysts is insufficient.

What happens to abnormally fertilized embryos? A scoping review

A dearth of evidence exists on embryos derived from oocytes without two pronuclei (2PN) or 'normal fertilization', i.e. embryos arising from non-pronuclear oocytes (0PN), mono-pronuclear oocytes (1PN) and tri-pronuclear oocytes (3PN). We searched the published literature on non-2PN oocytes and their clinical outcomes using a two-part collection strategy of relevant articles. A total of 33 articles were deemed eligible for the scoping review. A significant difference exists between potential development of oocytes with an abnormal number of pronuclei and those with 2PN in most studies; the abnormal pronuclei oocytes occur rarely and significant attrition occurs between day 1 and day 6, with corresponding reduction in chromosome integrity and clinical utility. Most recent studies describe outcomes of blastocysts derived from non-2PN oocytes, rather than cleavage stage embryo transfers. Compared with 2PN oocytes, blastocyst rates are lower in 1PN oocytes (68.3 versus 32.2%), with larger 1PN oocytes having better developmental potential compared with their smaller counterparts. Blastocysts from 1PN oocytes seem to have a slightly reduced implantation potential compared with those from 2PN blastocysts (33.3% versus 35.9%), with a reduced ongoing pregnancy rate (27.3% versus 28.1%). Live birth rates were only reported in 13 of the included studies. The comparators varied between studies, with live birth rates provided ranging from 0-66.7%, with two case reports (100%); this is a clear indication of the variability in practices and the significant heterogeneity of studies. A distinct lack of evidence exists on non-2PN oocytes; however, it seems that most abnormally fertilized oocytes that are non-viable will developmentally arrest in culture, and those that are viable can form viable pregnancies. Concerns remain about the outcome of pregnancies arising from the use of abnormally fertilized oocytes. Coupled with appropriate outcome measures, abnormally fertilized oocytes hold the potential to increase the pool of embryos eligible for transfer.

Prediction of live birth in vitrified-warmed 1PN-derived blastocyst transfer: Overall quality grade, ICM, TE, and expansion degree

Background: Numerous studies have reported that transfer of blastocysts derived from monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes achieved live births. However, the potential value of morphology grading for the prediction of 1PN blastocyst viability is unclear, and the blastocyst selection criterion for successful pregnancy has not been set up yet. The aim of this study is to assess the ability of the blastocyst morphology grading system based on three parameters, namely, inner cell mass (ICM), trophectoderm (TE), and expansion degree and to predict outcomes of a cycle with single 1PN blastocyst transfer.

Methods: A total of 266 vitrified-warmed 1PN-derived blastocyst transfer cycles for IVF treatment at Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital between 2007 and 2020 were included. The study was performed on single blastocyst transfers. Electronic records of patients were retrospectively analyzed. In the current study, the blastocysts were classified into three groups: “good,” 3-6AA, 3-6AB, 3-6BA; “medium,” 3-6BB, 3-6AC, 3-6CA; and “poor,” 3-6BC, 3-6CB, 3-6CC. The basal characteristics, embryo grading, and clinical outcomes were compared between the three groups. The association of morphology parameters with pregnancies and live births was analyzed. Logistic regression was adopted to set up a prediction model of live births.

Results: Transfer of the good-quality blastocysts achieved significant higher pregnancies (biochemical pregnancy: 59%; clinical pregnancy: 56.4%, and live birth 48.7%) than those in the group of the medium (biochemical pregnancy: 59%; clinical pregnancy: 49.6%; live birth: 40.4%) or poor-quality (biochemical pregnancy: 38.4%; clinical pregnancy: 34.9%; live birth: 26.7%) blastocysts (p &lt; 0.05). There was a significant association between ICM and live birth. A prediction model of live births involving ICM, TE, and expansion degree was set up.

Conclusion: In 1PN transfer cycles, a higher overall blastocyst quality is shown to correlate most strongly with optimal pregnancy and live birth outcomes. The selection of high-quality blastocysts for transfer should consider the ICM score first. The prediction model of live births based on ICM, TE, and expansion degree may help predict successful pregnancy in 1PN single-blastocyst transfer cycles.

Developmental trajectory of monopronucleated zygotes after in vitro fertilization when they include both male and female genomes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the cause of monopronucleated zygote (1PN) formation that includes both maternal and paternal genomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private fertility clinic.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 44 1PN and 726 2-pronuclear zygotes from 702 patients were observed using 2 different time-lapse observation systems.

INTERVENTION(S)

Previously recorded time lapse data were reviewed to examine the mechanism of 1PN formation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The distance between the position of the second polar body extrusion and the fertilization cone or epicenter/starting position of the cytoplasmic wave was measured, and the consequent data were analyzed. Cytoplasmic waves were confirmed using vector analysis software.

RESULT(S)

The cut-off value for the difference in the distance between the position of the second polar body extrusion and the fertilization cone or the epicenter/starting position of the cytoplasmic wave was 17 μm (AUC: 0.987, 95% CI: 0.976-0.999) for the Embryo Scope and 18 μm (AUC: 0.972, 95% CI: 0.955-0.988) for the iBIS time-lapse observation systems.

CONCLUSION(S)

In this study, it was found with a high degree of accuracy that a monopronucleus is formed when the fusion of the sperm takes place within 18 μm from the point of the second polar body extrusion. The theoretical chance of 1PN occurrence after in vitro fertilization is 2.7% when the sperm is considered to be fused anywhere in the plasma membrane of an oocyte.

Monopronucleated (1PN) and tripronuclear (3PN) zygotes formation during assisted reproduction in POSEIDON group 4 patients: Emphasizing on polar bodies

AIM

Abnormal fertilization (1PN/3PN) and its accompanying polar body (PB) conditions have been less discussed in poor ovarian responders. By observing the PBs, we analyzed the mechanisms of abnormal fertilization and aimed to explore the role of intracytoplasmic sperm injection/in vitro fertilization (ICSI/IVF) in POSEIDON group 4 patients.

METHODS

An observational study. All fresh IVF/ICSI cycles from January 2018 to December 2019 were evaluated. The inclusion criteria were POSEIDON group 4. Fertilization and PB conditions were assessed 16-18 h post-insemination. Primary observation endpoints including normal fertilization, abnormal fertilization, and total fertilization failure rate.

RESULTS

A total of 351 cycles involving 180 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 cycles reported no retrieved oocytes. Finally, 336 cycles (IVF, n = 267; ICSI, n = 69) were included. A total of 1005 oocytes and 939 embryos were assessed. The mean female age was 40.8 years, and the mean AMH level was 0.6 ng/mL. The normal fertilization rate was 69.7%. The zygote distribution was 18.7% 0PN, 3.9% 1PN, 66.9% 2PN, 9.5% 3PN, and 1.0% ≥4PN. For 1PN zygotes, 59% were denoted as 1PN2PB. The mean 3PN rate was 8.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

In POSEIDON group 4, most of the monopronucleated zygotes were 1PN2PB. Digyny (3PN1PB), due to failure to extrude the second PB, was the major cause of triploidy in which ICSI could not circumvent. The distribution of abnormally fertilized zygotes was similar in IVF and ICSI. To investigate the mechanisms of abnormal fertilization and assess whether ICSI is necessary, analysis of PB will provide important clues.

Strictly selected Mono- and non-pronuclear blastocysts could result in appreciable clinical outcomes in IVF cycles

The aim of the study was to examine the clinical value of blastocysts derived from mono-pronuclear (1PN) or non-pronuclear (0PN) zygotes with two polar bodies (2PB), which were selected by our criteria. We retrospectively analysed 610 frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FET) cycles and the corresponding oocyte retrieval cycles from 2014 to 2017. Developmental potential and clinical outcomes of embryos derived from zygotes with various numbers of pronuclei were analysed. Based on more detailed pre-selection settings, blastulation rates of 1PN/2PB and 0PN/2PB-derived embryos were 70.18% and 69.17%, respectively. Blastocyst FET results were not significantly different between 2PN/2PB, 1PN/2PB and 0PN/2PB groups in terms of clinical pregnancy rates (59.79%, 47.06% and 56.25%), implantation rates (47.24%, 40.00% and 47.62%), live birth rates (49.39%, 29.41% and 43.75%) or malformation rates (0%, 0% and 0%). In conclusion, after strict morphological selection and blastocyst culture, 1PN/2PB and 0PN/2PB-derived embryos in IVF cycles can have considerable clinical value. Blastocysts derived from 1PN/2PB or 0PN/2PB zygotes are worthwhile FET option for patients who have no available 2PN-derived embryos.

Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after the transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts developing from nonpronuclear and monopronuclear zygotes: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes after the transfer of vitrified-warmed single blastocysts developing from nonpronuclear (0PN) and monopronuclear (1PN) zygotes.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Affiliated hospital.

PATIENT(S)

This study was a retrospective analysis of 435 0PN and 281 1PN vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers, and 151 0PN and 75 1PN singletons, compared with 13,167 two-pronuclear (2PN) vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfers and 4,559 2PN singletons, respectively.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rate (PR), abortion rate (AR), live birth rate (LBR), and singleton birthweight were the primary outcome measures.

RESULT(S)

PR, AR, and LBR were similar when compared between the 0PN and 2PN groups after vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer. However, the 0PN group had a higher birthweights, higher z scores, and a greater proportion of very large for gestational age newborns. When comparing the 1PN and 2PN groups, we found that the PR was similar whereas the AR was higher and the LBR was lower. No differences were detected in the other neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION(S)

The results of the present study show that the transfer of 2PN blastocysts should be prioritized because of a higher AR and a lower LBR after 1PN blastocyst transfers and a higher birthweight after 0PN blastocyst transfers when compared with 2PN blastocyst transfers. Our data indicate the need for concern about the safety of 1PN and 0PN embryo transfers.