A systematic review of pediatric neuropsychological outcomes with proton versus photon radiation therapy: A call for equity in access to treatment

Neighborhood resources are associated with neuropsychological outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors

Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment in survivors of pediatric brain tumors is a public health concern, yet studies seldom explore the role of social determinants of health beyond treatment effects. We investigated the influence of neighborhood resources using the Child Opportunity Index (COI) on neuropsychological functioning in survivors. Methods: Intelligence (IQ) and untimed reading and math proficiency were assessed retrospectively in 190 survivors. Multiple regression analyses explored associations among the COI composite and indices (Education, Health-Environment, Social-Economic) and neuropsychological outcomes, controlling for cumulative neurological risk and treatment exposures (Neurological Predictor Scale; NPS) and parental education. Results: Performance was on average within normal limits: IQ (M = 94.08, SD = 15.85, d=.37) with 13.4% of scores below impairment thresholds; reading (M = 95.08, SD = 17.36, d=.28) and math calculation (M = 91.84, SD = 18.82, d=.43) with 16.92% and 20.63% of scores below impairment thresholds, respectively. Each COI domain predicted reading and IQ after controlling for NPS, parental education, and age at diagnosis; however, the Education domain was the only significant predictor of math outcomes. Conclusion: The COI domains significantly predicted IQ and untimed academic skills in survivors, revealing the critical role of neighborhood resources on cognition above and beyond parental education and treatment factors. This is among the first studies to illuminate the influence of neighborhood resources on cognition in survivors. Future research should examine neighborhood context, an understudied construct, with importance in the move toward precision medicine.

Demographic, medical, and neighborhood barriers to clinical neuropsychological services in pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated in the United States

BACKGROUND

Medulloblastoma is the most commonly occurring malignant brain tumor of childhood. Treatment includes a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, all of which are associated with cognitive impairments. Despite appreciation of the value of neuropsychological evaluations to assess for cognitive impairments, there are barriers to these evaluations. This study aimed to identify potential demographic, medical, or neighborhood factors associated with barriers to neuropsychological evaluations.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review identified pediatric patients with a medulloblastoma diagnosed between 2005 and 2024. Demographic, medical, and neighborhood factors were gleaned from the medical records.

RESULTS

Of the 67 identified patients, only 36 (53.73%) completed a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Patients who obtained a neuropsychological evaluation were more likely to be non-Hispanic [X2 (1,62) = 9.20, p = <.01], diagnosed at younger ages [t(60) = - 8.40, p =  < 0.001], treated with photon radiation therapy [X2 (1,62) = 15.24, p =  < 0.001], live closer to the hospital [t(60) = 3.19, p = 0.001], and live in communities with higher health-related resources [t(60) = - 2.09, p = 0.02]. The two groups did not differ by any of the medical/clinical factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropsychological evaluations assess for cognitive changes following cancer directed treatment, clarify other diagnostic possibilities (e.g., learning or attention difficulties), and facilitate access to appropriate accommodations and school- and community- based services. Although neuropsychological evaluations are recommended as standard of care following treatment for medulloblastoma, we identified demographic, medical, and neighborhood-level factors that serve as barriers to clinical neuropsychological evaluations. Implications for clinical care and recommendations to address these barriers are discussed.

Seeing through "brain fog": neuroimaging assessment and imaging biomarkers for cancer-related cognitive impairments

Advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment have substantially improved patient outcomes and survival in recent years. However, up to 75% of cancer patients and survivors, including those with non-central nervous system (non-CNS) cancers, suffer from "brain fog" or impairments in cognitive functions such as attention, memory, learning, and decision-making. While we recognize the impact of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), we have not fully investigated and understood the causes, mechanisms and interplays of various involving factors. Consequently, there are unmet needs in clinical oncology in assessing the risk of CRCI and managing patients and survivors with this condition in order to make informed treatment decisions and ensure the quality of life for cancer survivors. The state-of-the-art neuroimaging technologies, particularly clinical imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET), have been widely used to study neuroscience questions, including CRCI. However, in-depth applications of these functional and molecular imaging methods in CRCI and their clinical implementation for CRCI management are largely limited. This scoping review provides the current understanding of contributing neurological factors to CRCI and applications of the state-of-the-art multi-modal neuroimaging methods in investigating the functional and structural alterations related to CRCI. Findings from these studies and potential imaging-biomarkers of CRCI that can be used to improve the assessment and characterization of CRCI as well as to predict the risk of CRCI are also highlighted. Emerging issues and perspectives on future development and applications of neuroimaging tools to better understand CRCI and incorporate neuroimaging-based approaches to treatment decisions and patient management are discussed.

How Cancer Harms the Developing Brain: Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Cancer Survivors

Survival rates for pediatric cancer are improving, resulting in a rising need to understand and address long-term sequelae. In this narrative review, we summarize the effects of cancer and its treatment on the developing brain, with a focus on neurocognitive function in leukemia and pediatric brain tumor survivors. We then discuss possible mechanisms of brain injury and management considerations.

Risk factors for neurocognitive impairment, emotional distress, and poor quality of life in survivors of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

BACKGROUND

Prevalence and risk of poor psychological outcomes following rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) are not well-established.

METHODS

Participants in this cross-sectional, case-control study (n = 713 survivors, 42.5% female; mean [SD] age, 30.5 [6.6] years; n = 706 siblings, 57.2% female; mean age, 32.8,[7.9] years) completed measures of neurocognition, emotional distress, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Multivariable logistic regression models identified treatments, health behaviors, and chronic conditions associated with impairment.

RESULTS

Relative to siblings, more survivors reported neurocognitive impairment (task efficiency: 21.1% vs. 13.7%, emotional regulation: 16.7% vs. 11.0%, memory: 19.3% vs. 15.1%), elevated emotional distress (somatic distress: 12.9% vs. 4.7%, anxiety: 11.7% vs. 5.9%, depression: 22.8% vs. 16.9%) and poorer HRQOL (physical functioning: 11.1% vs. 2.8%, role functioning due to physical problems: 16.8% vs. 8.2%, pain: 17.5% vs. 10.0%, vitality: 22.3% vs. 13.8%, social functioning: 14.4% vs. 6.8%, emotional functioning: 17.1% vs. 10.6%). Cranial radiation increased risk for impaired task efficiency (odds ratio [OR], 2.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-4.63), whereas chest and pelvic radiation predicted increased risk of physical functioning (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.16-6.21 and OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.70-6.95, respectively). Smoking was associated with impaired task efficiency (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.14-3.70), memory (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.26-3.95), anxiety (OR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.36-5.41) and depression (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.01-3.11). Neurologic conditions increased risk of anxiety (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.04-5.10), and hearing conditions increased risk of depression (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.05-3.03). Neurologic and hearing conditions, respectively, were associated with impaired memory (OR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.20-4.95 and OR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.05-3.35) and poor health perception (OR, 2.62; 95% CI, 1.62-1.28 and OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.34-4.06).

CONCLUSIONS

RMS survivors are at significant risk for poor psychological outcomes. Advancing therapies for local control, smoking cessation, and managing chronic medical conditions may mitigate poor outcomes following RMS.

S, Xing M, Tonning Olsson I, de Blank PMK, Lange KR, Salloum R, Srivastava D, Leisenring WM, Howell RM, Oeffinger KC, Robison LL, Armstrong GT, Krull KR, Brinkman TM. Evolving therapies, neurocognitive outcomes, and functional independence in adult survivors of childhood glioma

BACKGROUND

Treatment of childhood glioma has evolved to reduce radiotherapy exposure with the goal of limiting late toxicity. However, the associations between treatment changes and neurocognition, and the contribution of neurocognition and chronic health conditions to attainment of adult independence, remain unknown.

METHODS

Adult survivors of childhood glioma diagnosed in 1970-1999 in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (n = 1284; median [minimum-maximum] 30 [18-51] years of age at assessment; 22 [15-34] years from diagnosis) self-reported neurocognitive impairment and chronic health conditions. Multivariable models evaluated associations between changes in treatment exposures (surgery only, chemotherapy [with or without surgery], cranial radiation [with or without chemotherapy and/or surgery]), and neurocognitive impairment. Latent class analysis with 5 indicators (employment, independent living, assistance with routine and/or personal care needs, driver's license, marital or partner status) identified classes of functional independence. Path analysis tested associations among treatment exposures, neurocognitive impairment, chronic health conditions, and functional independence. Statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

Cranial radiation exposure decreased over time (51%, 1970s; 46%, 1980s; 27%, 1990s]. However, compared with siblings, survivors with any treatment exposure were at elevated risk for neurocognitive impairment, including surgery only (eg, memory: relative risk = 2.22; task efficiency: relative risk = 1.88; both P < .001). Three classes of functional independence were identified: independent (58%), moderately independent (20%), and nonindependent (22%). Cranial radiation was associated with nonindependence through impaired task efficiency (β = 0.06), sensorimotor (β = 0.06), and endocrine (β = 0.10) chronic health conditions and through the associations between these conditions and task efficiency (each β = 0.04). Sensorimotor and endocrine chronic health conditions were associated with nonindependence through memory.

CONCLUSION

Most long-term glioma survivors achieve adult independence. However, functional nonindependence is associated with treatment-related neurocognitive impairment and chronic health conditions.

Approaches to Minimise the Neurodevelopmental Impact of Choroid Plexus Carcinoma and Its Treatment

Choroid plexus carcinomas (CPC) are rare aggressive tumours that primarily affect very young children. Treatment for CPC typically involves a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Whilst considered necessary for a cure, these therapies have significant neurocognitive consequences for patients, negatively impacting cognitive function including memory, attention, executive functioning, and full-scale intelligence quotients (FSIQ). These challenges significantly impact the quality of life and ultimately socioeconomic parameters such as the level of educational attainment, marital status, and socioeconomic status. This review looks at the tumour- and treatment-related causes of neurocognitive damage in CPC patients and the progress made in finding strategies to reduce these. Opportunities to mitigate the neurodevelopmental consequences of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are explored in the context of CPC treatment. Evaluation of the pathological and biological mechanisms of injury has identified innovative approaches to neurocognitive protection and neurorehabilitation, which aim to limit the neurocognitive damage. This review aims to highlight multiple approaches physicians can use when treating young children with CPC, to focus on neurocognitive outcomes as a measure of success.

Assessing Equity of Access to Proton Beam Therapy: A Literature Review

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is one of the most advanced radiotherapy technologies, with growing evidence to support its use in specific clinical scenarios and exponential growth of demand and capacity worldwide over the past few decades. However, geographical inequalities persist in the distribution of PBT centres, which translate into variations in access and use of this technology. The aim of this work was to look at the factors that contribute to these inequalities, to help raise awareness among stakeholders, governments and policy makers. A literature search was conducted using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) criteria. The same search strategy was run in Embase and Medline and identified 242 records, which were screened for manual review. Of these, 24 were deemed relevant and were included in this analysis. Most of the 24 publications included in this review originated from the USA (22/24) and involved paediatric patients, teenagers and young adults (61% for children and/or teenagers and young adults versus 39% for adults). The most reported indicator of disparity was socioeconomic status (16/24), followed by geographical location (13/24). All the studies evaluated in this review showed disparities in the access to PBT. As paediatric patients make up a significant proportion of the PBT-eligible patients, equity of access to PBT also raises ethical considerations. Therefore, further research is needed into the equity of access to PBT to reduce the care gap.