Managing Anxiety from Cancer (MAC): A pilot randomized controlled trial of an anxiety intervention for older adults with cancer and their caregivers

Effectiveness of Dyadic Interventions on Quality of Life for Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Increases in cancer survivorship negatively impact patients and family caregivers, decreasing quality of life. Previous dyadic interventions involved them as a unit and focused on their outcomes, but inconsistent results existed in influencing quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To assess dyadic intervention effect on quality of life for cancer patients and family caregivers across different cancer types and intervention durations.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

METHODS

Six databases were searched from establishment until 14 January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search process, literature screening, and data extraction. The ROB version 2 and GRADE were respectively used to check the methodology and evidence quality. The data were analysed via RStudio, and intervention effects were estimated with 95% CIs and SMDs. The statistical heterogeneity was explored through the I2 statistic, P values, and Egger's test, and differences in overall effects were deemed statistically significant, having a P value < 0.05. Subgroup analysis was also conducted.

RESULTS

13 RCTs with 1625 participants, published from 2005 to 2021, were included. The results demonstrated that dyadic interventions enhanced quality of life for both cancer patients and family caregivers. Subgroup analysis suggested that family-centred interventions for patients with specific cancer types, which lasted for a long period (> 6 weeks), enhanced quality of life for cancer patients and family caregivers. The evidence and methodology were of a moderate quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses are important practitioners of culture-oriented dyadic interventions. Long-term (> 6 weeks) and family-centred dyadic interventions for patients with a specific cancer type can enhance cancer patients' and family caregivers' quality of life, along with digital intelligence approaches to promote mutual communication and strengthen family relationships, thereby optimising oncology clinical nursing and enhancing the quality of life, health, and welfare of the entire family.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Dyadic interventions emphasising the involvement of both cancer patients and family caregivers should be considered and tailored by professionals and oncology nurses to establish harmonious family relationships, improve family coping techniques and decision-making to enhance the whole family's quality of life and well-being according to their cultural contexts, and promote more efficient, targeted, and economical oncology care.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution because all the involved participants were from existing studies, and the design, conduction, analysis, and interpretation of the data were completed by the authors in this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42024519432; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#recordDetails.

Emotional ecosystems: Understanding the relationship between family interactions and anxiety among cancer caregivers

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have challenged the assumption that families are invariable sources of support for cancer caregivers, noting that relationships with family members can have both positive and negative effects on caregiver well-being. This study expands upon prior literature to examine the relationship between cancer caregivers' perceptions of the quality of their family interactions and their symptoms of anxiety.

METHODS

We employed secondary analysis of baseline data from a multisite randomized clinical trial of an intervention for cancer caregivers conducted at 3 large academic palliative care clinics. We performed linear regression analyses to analyze the relationship between caregivers' perceptions of the quality of their family interactions and their symptoms of anxiety; additional models were estimated to further characterize this relationship with the addition of relevant covariates: race, ethnicity, sex, marital/relationship status, relationship to patient, employment status, household income, and perceived social support received from friends and significant others. We also conducted a sub-analysis of data provided by caregivers who were married or partnered to examine the relationship between their perceptions of the quality of their family interactions and their symptoms of anxiety with relationship satisfaction as a covariate.

RESULTS

Among our analytic sample (n = 244), we identified a significant negative relationship between cancer caregivers' perceptions of the quality of their family interactions and their symptoms of anxiety; this relationship remained statistically significant with the addition of covariates. Relationship satisfaction was not found to be a statistically significant covariate in our sub-analysis of married or partnered caregivers.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Study results provide strong support for the development, testing, and implementation of interventions to improve family interactions as a strategy to reduce caregiver anxiety.

Comparative Efficacy of Different Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats for Depression in Patients With Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) has been shown to be effective in improving depression in patients with cancer. However, diversity exists in the CBT delivery formats, and the optimal delivery format remains unconfirmed.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of different delivery formats of CBT interventions on depression in patients with cancer.

DESIGN

Network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCE

Six databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PsycINFO, were searched from inception to May 30, 2024.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently conducted study inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. A pairwise meta-analysis and a network meta-analysis were performed sequentially to determine the efficacy of CBT delivery formats for improving depression in patients with cancer.

RESULTS

A total of 34 randomized controlled trials involving six delivery formats of CBT were included. Face-to-face group CBT (SMD = -0.88, 95% CI [-1.33, -0.44]), internet-based individual CBT (SMD = -0.49, 95% CI [-0.92, -0.06]), app-based individual CBT (SMD = -0.81, 95% CI [-1.45, -0.18]), and combined delivery formats of CBT for individual (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI [-0.62, -0.09]) were significantly more effective than the inactive control. The ranking probabilities revealed that face-to-face group CBT (P-score = 0.86), app-based individual CBT (P-score = 0.74) and internet-based individual CBT (P-score = 0.57) were the three most effective delivery formats of CBT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the efficacy ranking of different CBT delivery formats in improving depression in patients with cancer. These findings are expected to provide evidence-based support for future research and clinical decision making for improving depression in patients with cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42024553977).

Caring through uncertainty: a qualitative exploration of older colorectal cancer caregivers' experiences during palliative chemotherapy

PURPOSE

Despite the increasing research on cancer patient caregivers, there is still a lack of detailed understanding about the experiences of spouses caring for elderly colorectal cancer patients. This study aimed to fill this gap by examining the caregiving experiences of spouses during palliative chemotherapy for elderly Chinese colorectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Using a qualitative descriptive design, we recruited spousal caregivers of elderly colorectal cancer patients undergoing palliative chemotherapy. Semistructured interviews were conducted, and thematic analysis was employed to analyse the data.

RESULTS

Sixteen caregivers aged 60 to 82 years participated in the interviews. The analysis revealed three main themes: ambivalence, multiple role adaptation to conflicts, and the coexistence of hope and pressure. These themes shed light on the behaviors of older caregivers and the challenges they face, including physical and psychosocial issues associated with aging.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the significant stress and challenges experienced by older caregivers, characterized by intertwined emotions such as anxiety about their spouses' health deterioration, exhaustion from long-term care responsibilities, and anticipation of treatment outcomes.

What works to support carers of older people and older carers? an international evidence map of interventions and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Unpaid carers of older people, and older unpaid carers, experience a range of adverse outcomes. Supporting carers should therefore be a public health priority. Our understanding of what works to support carers could be enhanced if future evaluations prioritise under-researched interventions and outcomes. To support this, we aimed to: map evidence about interventions to support carers, and the outcomes evaluated; and identify key gaps in current evidence.

METHODS

Evidence gap map review methods were used. Searches were carried out in three bibliographic databases for quantitative evaluations of carer interventions published in OECD high-income countries between 2013 and 2023. Interventions were eligible if they supported older carers (50 + years) of any aged recipient, or any aged carers of older people (50 + years).

FINDINGS

205 studies reported across 208 publications were included in the evidence map. The majority evaluated the impact of therapeutic and educational interventions on carer burden and carers' mental health. Some studies reported evidence about physical exercise interventions and befriending and peer support for carers, but these considered a limited range of outcomes. Few studies evaluated interventions that focused on delivering financial information and advice, pain management, and physical skills training for carers. Evaluations rarely considered the impact of interventions on carers' physical health, quality of life, and social and financial wellbeing. Very few studies considered whether interventions delivered equitable outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on what works best to support carers is extensive but limited in scope. A disproportionate focus on mental health and burden outcomes neglects other important areas where carers may need support. Given the impact of caring on carers' physical health, financial and social wellbeing, future research could evaluate interventions that aim to support these outcomes. Appraisal of whether interventions deliver equitable outcomes across diverse carer populations is critical.

Effectiveness of Technology-Based Psychosocial Interventions on Psychological Outcomes Among Adult Cancer Patients and Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Technology-based psychosocial interventions (TBPIs) have increasingly gained intention. However, the effectiveness of TBPIs on psychological outcomes remains inconclusive. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of TBPIs on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), coping, self-efficacy, and depression among adult cancer patients and caregivers.

DATA SOURCES

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of TBPIs targeting adult cancer patients, caregivers, or patient-caregiver dyads were included. English articles dated from 2012 to 2022 were retrieved from eight electronic databases, three clinical trial registries, and six grey literature databases. Two reviewers independently screened, appraised, and extracted data. The Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool and GRADE were used to appraise the methodological quality of included studies. Meta-analyses and subgroup analyses were undertaken with statistical pooling of standardized mean differences based on the random-effects model.

CONCLUSION

Totally, 37 RCTs were included in the review, with 35 trials for meta-analysis. Results demonstrated improvements in HRQOL, self-efficacy, and depression among cancer patients and caregivers with varying pooled effect sizes. Subgroup analyses suggested that dyadic TBPIs were more effective in improving HRQOL among cancer patients and caregivers, compared with those solely targeted at cancer patients or caregivers.

IMPLICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Findings value-added to the existing evidence base on TBPIs. An interactive patient-caregiver dyadic program integrating TBPIs into routine oncology care is recommended to improve health outcomes for cancer patients and caregivers. Well-designed future RCTs are required to further evaluate the effectiveness of dyadic TBPIs, with emphasis on coping and self-efficacy outcomes among cancer patients and caregivers.

Third-wave cognitive behavioral therapies for caregivers of cancer patients: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cancer caregivers extend comprehensive support covering all aspects of patients' daily lives. It has been reported that a significant proportion of cancer caregivers experience emotional distress. As one way to solve this problem, third-wave cognitive behavioral therapies (CBT), which involves integrating acceptance and mindfulness into cognitive‒behavioral therapy, has been applied to improve caregiver outcomes.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted based on the scoping review guidelines proposed by the Jonna Briggs Institute (JBI). The population was caregivers of cancer patients, the concept was third-wave CBT, and the context remained open. English and Korean publications published from 2001 to June 2022 were identified from PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, Korea Med, and RISS.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were included in this scoping review. Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) was the most frequently applied intervention (n = 3, each). Among the components of third-wave CBT, 'mindfulness' was identified in all the studies reviewed (n = 12). Dyadic interventions comprised the majority (n = 9). Interventions using digital technologies such as mobile application/web page (n = 3), telephone (n = 3), and FaceTime (n = 2) have increased since 2017. Depression was the most frequently evaluated outcome (n = 8), followed by anxiety and mindfulness (n = 6, each).

CONCLUSIONS

The current review explored available third-wave CBT intervention studies for cancer caregivers and targeted outcomes. Most of the interventions were dyadic interventions and utilized mindfulness. Delivery methods were continuously updated with digital technologies. Further RCTs with robust research designs and a synthesis of the results of the trials would provide evidence about how to effectively apply third-wave CBTs for cancer caregivers.

Telehealth-Based Music Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Cancer Survivors: Rationale and Protocol for a Comparative Effectiveness Trial

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors represent one of the fastest growing populations in the United States. Unfortunately, nearly 1 in 3 survivors experience anxiety symptoms as a long-term consequence of cancer and its treatment. Characterized by restlessness, muscle tension, and worry, anxiety worsens the quality of life; impairs daily functioning; and is associated with poor sleep, depressed mood, and fatigue. Although pharmacological treatment options are available, polypharmacy has become a growing concern for cancer survivors. Music therapy (MT) and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) are evidence-based, nonpharmacological treatments that have demonstrated effectiveness in treating anxiety symptoms in cancer populations and can be adapted for remote delivery to increase access to mental health treatments. However, the comparative effectiveness of these 2 interventions delivered via telehealth is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aims of the Music Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer-related Anxiety (MELODY) study are to determine the comparative effectiveness of telehealth-based MT versus telehealth-based CBT for anxiety and comorbid symptoms in cancer survivors and to identify patient-level factors associated with greater anxiety symptom reduction for MT and CBT.

METHODS

The MELODY study is a 2-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial that aims to compare the effectiveness of MT versus CBT for anxiety and comorbid symptoms. The trial will enroll 300 English- or Spanish-speaking survivors of any cancer type or stage who have experienced anxiety symptoms for at least 1 month. Participants will receive 7 weekly sessions of MT or CBT delivered remotely via Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc) over 7 weeks. Validated instruments to assess anxiety (primary outcome), comorbid symptoms (fatigue, depression, insomnia, pain, and cognitive dysfunction), and health-related quality of life will be administered at baseline and at weeks 4, 8 (end of treatment), 16, and 26. Semistructured interviews will be conducted at week 8 with a subsample of 60 participants (30 per treatment arm) to understand individual experiences with the treatment sessions and their impact.

RESULTS

The first study participant was enrolled in February 2022. As of January 2023, 151 participants have been enrolled. The trial is expected to be completed by September 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first and largest randomized clinical trial to compare the short- and long-term effectiveness of remotely delivered MT and CBT for anxiety in cancer survivors. Limitations include the lack of usual care or placebo control groups and the lack of formal diagnostic assessments for psychiatric disorders among trial participants. The study findings will help guide treatment decisions for 2 evidence-based, scalable, and accessible interventions to promote mental well-being during cancer survivorship.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/46281.

Dyadic interventions in older people with chronic diseases: An integrative review

This integrative review aims to explore the current state of dyadic interventions in older people with chronic diseases and to review how these interventions are developed and conducted. 'Older people' and 'dyadic intervention' were searched in six databases to include studies published before August 2021. The constant comparison method was used for data synthesis, combined with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)¹ and mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT)² to assess the quality of the literature. Nineteen studies were included and could be divided into four types in which caregivers could be seen as subordinators, directors, cooperators and collaborators. Dyadic interaction could be observed in all studies, including dyad coled, patient-led, and caregiver-led interactions. The outcome indicators included patient-, caregiver-, dyad-, and family-related indicators. It is important not only to include the dyad but also to consider the dyadic interactions. In the future, dyadic intervention can be guided by matching dyadic theories. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study is an integrative review; the study population was not directly contacted. Data from included studies were analysed and interpreted.

Perceptions of somatic and affective symptoms and psychosocial care utilization in younger and older survivors of lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Rates of depression identification in oncology settings and referral to psychosocial services remain low. Patients with lung cancer face an elevated risk of depression relative to patients with other cancers. This study explored perceptions of somatic and affective symptoms and psychosocial care utilization among younger and older lung cancer survivors.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 adults at two academic medical centers in Boston, MA, who had received a lung cancer diagnosis in the past 24 months. A semi-structured interview guide was used to assess experiences with, and perceptions of, depression symptoms and psychosocial services. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded to identify themes. We also explored differences between younger (<65years; N=9) and older (>65years; N=11) patients.

RESULTS

Participants commonly described somatic symptoms (i.e., changes in appetite, sleep, or energy levels) and affective symptoms (i.e., worry, fear, sadness) as side effects of cancer treatment. Older participants more commonly contextualized these symptoms with information about how they impacted daily life. Both younger and older participants faced barriers to accessing psychosocial services, with older adults more commonly referencing stigma of service referral and utilization.

DISCUSSION

Patients with lung cancer associated both somatic and affective symptoms with their cancer and its treatment, with age differences in how symptoms were described and how psychosocial referrals may be perceived. More systematic integration of psychosocial care into cancer care may help to increase the identification of depression in lung cancer and reduce barriers to psychosocial service utilization.

Utilizing a manualized therapy to provide parallel treatment to older adults with cancer and their caregivers: A case study

The experience of anxiety is a common and understandable reaction to a diagnosis of and treatment for cancer. Patients of any age may experience negative psychological and physical symptoms during cancer treatment; older adults with cancer simultaneously face the impact of cancer and the effects of aging. Caregivers of older adults with cancer are also vulnerable to experiencing anxiety as their loved one navigates the physical and emotional sequelae of their illness and treatment. This paper describes the use of Managing Anxiety from Cancer (MAC), a 7-session telephone-delivered manualized cognitive-behavioral intervention that includes strategies from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Problem-Solving Therapy, with an older woman with cancer and her adult daughter. MAC includes a variety of techniques for patients and caregivers, who are encouraged to use these strategies individually or in different combinations to manage their anxiety. This brief treatment provided a parallel experience for the participants, as the older adult patient and her caregiver were taught the same anxiety-management techniques by their individual therapists. We will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of using a manualized psychotherapy intervention in this case, as well as MAC's impact on each member of this pair and on the dyad as a unit. Both the patient and her caregiver reported experiencing benefit from their participation in MAC and identified MAC-acquired skills they planned to use in the future to manage their anxiety and improve communication. While assessment data did not reflect a decrease in anxiety, it is possible that the stress of the COVID-19 pandemic confounded these data.

A meta-analysis of the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on quality of life and negative emotions of informal cancer caregivers

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to systematically review the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in terms of improving the quality of life (QOL) and negative emotion of informal cancer caregivers.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and China Biology Medicine disc (CBMdisc) were searched from the database establishment to October 2021. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation were conducted based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata 14.0 software was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,348 cancer informal caregivers (CGs) were included in this study, with an overall loss rate of 13.3%. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the impact of CBT on QOL (SMD = 0.28, 95%CI: -0.09-0.65, P < 0.001). However, the improvement of depression in CBT intervention group was significantly better than that in control group (SMD = -0.32, 95%CI: -0.56 to -0.07, P = 0.010). The HADS subgroup showed differences in depression scores (SMD = -0.80, 95%CI: -1.30 to -0.29, P = 0.002). The overall effect of CBT on anxiety was statistically different, the improvement of anxiety in CBT intervention group was significantly better than that in control group (SMD = -0.36, 95%CI: -0.720-0.004, P = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

CBT had a positive effect on reducing depression and anxiety in informal cancer caregivers, and the effect on quality of life was not statistically significant, but showed a positive trend.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://inplasy.com/generate-invoice/, identifier: INPLASY202230120.

The Role of Family Caregivers in the Care of Older Adults with Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview on the role of family caregivers (FCGs) in the care of older adults with cancer and review quality of life needs for FCGs.

DATA SOURCES

Journal articles, research reports, state of the science papers, position papers, and clinical guidelines from professional organizations were used.

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of multiple comorbidities and the associated burden of geriatric events in older adults have a substantial impact on the quality of life of their FCGs. Practical and efficient models of comprehensive assessment, interventions, and caregiving preparedness support are needed to improve outcomes for both older adults with cancer and their FCGs.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Oncology nurses practicing in clinical and research settings have a responsibility to prepare themselves with evidence-based knowledge and resources to include the needs of FCGs in the care provided to older adults with cancer.