Effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT) for social anxiety disorder: immediate and long-term benefits

Lost connection? Comparing group cohesion and treatment outcomes between videoconference and in-person cognitive behavioural group therapy for social anxiety disorder and other anxiety disorders

BACKGROUND

One of the most effective treatments for social anxiety disorder (SAD) is cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT). Prior research indicates group cohesion is connected to treatment success in group CBT for SAD (CBGT). Videoconference CBGT delivery is now common following the COVID-19 pandemic; however, research investigating treatment outcomes and group cohesion in videoconference CBGT for SAD is limited.

AIMS

The present study aimed to compare group cohesion in videoconference CBGT for SAD to group cohesion in both in-person CBGT for SAD and videoconference CBGT for other anxiety and related disorders. A secondary aim was to compare symptom reduction across all three groups.

METHOD

Patients completed a 12-week CBGT program for SAD in-person (n=28), SAD via videoconference (n=46), or for another anxiety or related disorder via videoconference (n=100). At mid- and post-treatment patients completed the Group Cohesion Scale Revised (GCS-R), and at pre- and post-treatment patients completed the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN, only in the SAD groups) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21).

RESULTS

Over the course of treatment, all three groups showed a significant increase in cohesion and a significant decrease in symptoms (ηp2 ranged from .156 to .562, all p<.001). Furthermore, analyses revealed no significant difference in cohesion scores between groups at both mid- and post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that videoconference CBGT for SAD is similarly effective in facilitating cohesion and reducing symptoms compared with in-person delivery. Limitations of the study and implications for treatment are discussed.

Acceptability, engagement, and efficacy of cognitive remediation for cognitive outcomes in young adults with first-episode psychosis and social anxiety: A randomized-controlled trial

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a frequent comorbidity in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and may increase cognitive impairments. Cognitive remediation (CR) is an effective treatment for cognition, particularly in a group format. This study aims to assess the efficacy, acceptability and engagement of group CR on cognitive outcomes in FEP+SAD compared to group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Participants with FEP+SAD were randomized to group CR (n = 45) or CBT-SAD (n = 51). They were assessed for cognition at baseline, post-therapy and 3- and 6-month follow-up. The CR group additionally completed scale to assess perceived competency and enjoyment in CR. Linear mixed models for repeated measures were used for cognitive scores. Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to summarize acceptability, perceived competency, and enjoyment, for CR completers and non-completers. The CR group performed significantly better than CBT on executive functions and visual memory at post-therapy compared to baseline. Twenty participants completed CR (44 %; mean 5.5 sessions). At week 1, CR non-completers presented higher levels of perceived competency. Completers reported higher enjoyment scores at the last session compared to the first session. Group CR is effective for cognitive outcomes in FEP+SAD, but acceptability and engagement present a challenge. Future studies are necessary to explore approaches promoting engagement.

Feasibility of an Intensive, Disorder-Specific, Group-Based Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Intervention for Adolescents with Social Anxiety Disorder

This study examined the preliminary acceptability and efficacy of an intensive, group-based, disorder-specific cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention for adolescents with social anxiety disorder (SAD). Fourteen Australian adolescents with SAD (78.6% female, M age = 13.93 years) and their parents completed the program plus measures of treatment satisfaction, and provided feedback. Clinical interviews and surveys were administered pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6-month follow-up to determine diagnostic status and assess related variables. Post-treatment satisfaction scores were very high for adolescents and parents. Post-treatment, 32.3% of participants no longer met criteria for SAD diagnosis, increasing to 42.9% at follow-up. Participants showed sizeable reductions in comorbid diagnoses, significant improvements in global functioning, social anxiety symptoms, and internalising symptoms from pre- to post-treatment (maintained at follow-up), and significant improvements in social skills and social competence from pre-treatment to follow-up. This study supports the use of an intensive CBT program for adolescents with SAD.

Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder in Routine Care

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is a prevalent chronic condition with a large demand for treatment. This community outpatient study examined the effectiveness of a group intervention version of the established one-to-one cognitive therapy derived from the Clark and Wells model for SAD. Questionnaires were completed pre-treatment and post-treatment for SAD symptoms (Social Phobia Scale, Social Interaction Anxiety Scale), depressive symptoms (BDI-II), self-focused attention, safety behaviours (Social Phobia Weekly Summary Scale and Subtle Avoidance Frequency Examination), and impaired functioning (Work and Social Adjustment Scale). From an initial sample of 159 participants, 101 completed at least seven of the nine weekly group sessions (Mage = 34.1 years, SDage = 10.8 years, 53% female). Significant improvements were demonstrated on all measures. Large effect sizes were found for social anxiety symptoms and safety behaviour use. Self-focused attention, depressive symptoms, and impaired functioning had moderate effect sizes. Effect sizes for anxiety (d = 1.00 and 1.32) and mood measures (d = 0.71) were as high, or in some cases, higher than previous group treatment studies. Results suggest group cognitive therapy for SAD based on the Clark and Wells model is effective in a clinical setting for individuals with moderate/severe and treatment-resistant social anxiety.

Effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group therapy for social anxiety disorder: long-term benefits and aftercare

BACKGROUND

Empirical research demonstrates the short- to medium-term efficacy and effectiveness of cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT) for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Little is known about the durability of gains beyond 1 year following treatment in real-life clinical settings. Literature regarding the impact of aftercare programs as an adjunct to CBGT treatment on SAD is scarce.

AIMS

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of CBGT for SAD in a community sample and to explore the relationship between long-term treatment outcomes and aftercare support group attendance.

METHOD

A longitudinal cohort design evaluated changes in standardized psychological measures assessing aspects of SAD, anxiety and depression. Questionnaires were completed before the program (time 1, N = 457), after the program (time 2, n = 369) and at an average of 4.6 years follow-up (time 3, n = 138).

RESULTS

Large treatment effect sizes at post-intervention were maintained at long-term follow-up on measures of SAD, anxiety and depression. There was no statistically significant relationship between frequency of attendance at an aftercare support group and degree of improvement from post-treatment severity on any measure.

CONCLUSIONS

CBGT is an effective intervention in the long-term in a routine clinical setting and should be considered a viable treatment option for SAD. Recommendations for future research, treatment implications and study limitations are considered.

Transdiagnostic versus diagnosis specific cognitive behavioural therapies for anxiety: A meta-analysis

Research evaluating transdiagnostic CBT (tCBT) demonstrates its efficacy. Some evidence suggests equivalence between tCBT and diagnosis-specific CBT (dxCBT), however more investigations are necessary to clarify any difference in efficacy. This meta-analysis was conducted to compare tCBT and dxCBT, and to investigate the differential impact of comorbidity on effect sizes. Pre and post scores from primary anxiety measures in 83 treatment conditions, taken from studies primarily targeting anxiety disorders, were summarised and compared. Meta-regression analyses were then used to test the effects of comorbidity. DxCBT and tCBT meta-effects were found to be large, where g=0.951, 95% CI: 0.874-1.027, and g=1.059, 95% CI: 0.876-1.242, respectively. While statistically different (p=0.008), overlap of confidence intervals indicated a lack of clinical significance. Furthermore, no relationship between comorbidity rate and tCBT outcome was observed. These results were discussed in the context of previous findings in the transdiagnostic CBT literature.