Automatic Mesofluidic System Combining Dynamic Gastrointestinal Bioaccessibility with Lab-on-Valve-Based Sorptive Microextraction for Risk Exposure of Organic Emerging Contaminants in Filter-Feeding Organisms

Sequential injection analysis coupled to on-line benchtop proton NMR: Method development and application to the determination of synthetic cathinones in seized drug samples

Synthetic cathinones are a class of new psychoactive substances (NPS), an emerging group of analogues to traditional illicit drugs which are functionalized to circumvent legal regulations. The analytical investigation of NPS by traditional methods, such as gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), is challenging because newly emerging NPS may not yet appear in spectral libraries and because of the inability to determine certain positional isomers. Low-field or "benchtop" proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) is an alternative that provides significant qualitative information but is particularly susceptible to matrix interferences. To this end, the development of a Sequential Injection Analysis (SIA) method which uses solid-phase extraction (SPE) to remove interfering matrix components prior to NMR determination is described. Factors including the type of SPE sorbent, column dimensions, and sample loading and elution conditions were examined. Several cathinone simulants (primary, secondary, and tertiary amines), "DEA exempt" cathinone standards, as well as authentic case samples were studied. The selectivity of the SIA-NMR-UV method was investigated against a broad range of "cutting agents" and was found to successfully remove all compounds tested with the exception of other basic drugs (e.g., acetaminophen). The limit of detection and reproducibility of the method were optimized using a Plackett-Burman screening design and Sequential Simplex optimization. Using a UV detector for dual (in series) quantification, the multivariate-optimized method produced a method limit of detection (3σ) for the cathinone simulant Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) of 23 μmol L^-1, and a calibration model, in terms of UV peak area, of Area = 0.19 [PPA, mmol L^-1] - 0.04. The optimized method generated ~2 mL of waste per day, and had a footprint of ~1 m² Finally, the multivariate-optimized SIA-NMR-UV method was successfully applied to several more case samples and the cathinones were definitively identified.

Microscale extraction versus conventional approaches for handling gastrointestinal extracts in oral bioaccessibility assays of endocrine disrupting compounds from microplastic contaminated beach sand

The unified bioaccessibility method (UBM) was harnessed to assess in vitro oral bioaccessibility pools of dialkyl phthalate congeners (with methyl, -ethyl, -butylbenzyl, -n-butyl, -2-ethylhexyl, and -n-octyl moieties) and bisphenol A at the 17 μg g^-1 level in beach sand contaminated with polyethylene microplastics. A variety of sample preparation approaches prior to the analysis of the UBM gastrointestinal extracts, including traditional methods (protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction, and solid-phase extraction) and dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) were comprehensively evaluated for clean-up and analyte enrichment. DLLME was chosen among all tested approaches on account of the high extraction efficiency (73-95%, excluding bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate and di-n-octyl phthalate), high sample throughput (∼7 min per set of samples), and environmental friendliness as demonstrated by the analytical eco-scale score of 83, and the green analytical procedure index pictogram with green/yellow labeling. The release of the less hydrophobic plastic-laden compounds (dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate and bisphenol A) from the contaminated sample into the body fluids was significant, with bioaccessibility values ranging from 30 to 70%, and from 43 to 74% in gastric and gastrointestinal fluids, respectively, and with relative standard deviation < 17% in all cases. The majority of the compounds were leached during gastric digestion, likely as the combined action of the low pH and the gastric enzymes. The risk exposure analysis revealed that accumulation/concentration in the body fluids is potentially relevant for dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate and bisphenol A, with relative accumulation ratios ranging from 1.1 ± 0.1 to 2.6 ± 0.4. The average daily intake values for the suite of compounds, corrected with the bioaccessibility fraction, ranged from 60 to 430 ng kg of body weight^-1·day^-1, in all cases, far below the tolerable daily intakes, thus indicating the lack of children health risk by ingestion of microplastic-laden sand with elevated concentrations of plasticizers.

Miniaturized analytical methods for determination of environmental contaminants of emerging concern - A review

The determination of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in environmental samples has become a challenging and critical issue. The present work focuses on miniaturized analytical strategies reported in the literature for the determination of CECs. The first part of the review provides brief overview of CECs whose monitoring in environmental samples is of particular significance, namely personal care products, pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, UV-filters, newly registered pesticides, illicit drugs, disinfection by-products, surfactants, high technology rare earth elements, and engineered nanomaterials. Besides, an overview of downsized sample preparation approaches reported in the literature for the determination of CECs in environmental samples is provided. Particularly, analytical methodologies involving microextraction approaches used for the enrichment of CECs are discussed. Both solid phase- and liquid phase-based microextraction techniques are highlighted devoting special attention to recently reported approaches. Special emphasis is placed on newly developed materials used for extraction purposes in microextraction techniques. In addition, recent contributions involving miniaturized analytical flow techniques for the determination of CECs are discussed. Besides, the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of point of need and portable devices have been identified and critically compared with chromatographic methods coupled to mass chromatography. Finally, challenging aspects regarding miniaturized analytical methods for determination of CECs are critically discussed.