Relaxed Chromatin Formation and Weak Suppression of Homologous Pairing by the Testis-Specific Linker Histone H1T

Cryo-EM structures of the BAF-Lamin A/C complex bound to nucleosomes

Barrier-to-autointegration factor (BAF) associates with mitotic chromosomes and promotes nuclear envelope assembly by recruiting proteins, such as Lamins, required for the reconstruction of the nuclear envelope and lamina. BAF also mediates chromatin anchoring to the nuclear lamina via Lamin A/C. However, the mechanism by which BAF and Lamin A/C bind chromatin and affect the chromatin organization remains elusive. Here we report the cryo-electron microscopy structures of BAF-Lamin A/C-nucleosome complexes. We find that the BAF dimer complexed with the Lamin A/C IgF domain occupies the nucleosomal dyad position, forming a tripartite nucleosomal DNA binding structure. We also show that the Lamin A/C Lys486 and His506 residues, which are reportedly mutated in lipodystrophy patients, directly contact the DNA at the nucleosomal dyad. Excess BAF-Lamin A/C complexes symmetrically bind other nucleosomal DNA sites and connect two BAF-Lamin A/C-nucleosome complexes. Although the linker histone H1 competes with BAF-Lamin A/C binding at the nucleosomal dyad region, the two BAF-Lamin A/C molecules still bridge two nucleosomes. These findings provide insights into the mechanism by which BAF, Lamin A/C, and/or histone H1 bind nucleosomes and influence chromatin organization within the nucleus.

Characteristic H3 N-tail dynamics in the nucleosome core particle, nucleosome, and chromatosome

The nucleosome core particle (NCP) comprises a histone octamer, wrapped around by ∼146-bp DNA, while the nucleosome additionally contains linker DNA. We previously showed that, in the nucleosome, H4 N-tail acetylation enhances H3 N-tail acetylation by altering their mutual dynamics. Here, we have evaluated the roles of linker DNA and/or linker histone on H3 N-tail dynamics and acetylation by using the NCP and the chromatosome (i.e., linker histone H1.4-bound nucleosome). In contrast to the nucleosome, H3 N-tail acetylation and dynamics are greatly suppressed in the NCP regardless of H4 N-tail acetylation because the H3 N-tail is strongly bound between two DNA gyres. In the chromatosome, the asymmetric H3 N-tail adopts two conformations: one contacts two DNA gyres, as in the NCP; and one contacts linker DNA, as in the nucleosome. However, the rate of H3 N-tail acetylation is similar in the chromatosome and nucleosome. Thus, linker DNA and linker histone both regulate H3-tail dynamics and acetylation.

The dark side of histones: genomic organization and role of oncohistones in cancer

Background

The oncogenic role of histone mutations is one of the most relevant discovery in cancer epigenetics. Recurrent mutations targeting histone genes have been described in pediatric brain tumors, chondroblastoma, giant cell tumor of bone and other tumor types. The demonstration that mutant histones can be oncogenic and drive the tumorigenesis in pediatric tumors, led to the coining of the term “oncohistones.” The first identified histone mutations were localized at or near residues normally targeted by post-translational modifications (PTMs) in the histone N-terminal tails and suggested a possible interference with histone PTMs regulation and reading.

Main body

In this review, we describe the peculiar organization of the multiple genes that encode histone proteins, and the latter advances in both the identification and the biological role of histone mutations in cancer. Recent works show that recurrent somatic mutations target both N-terminal tails and globular histone fold domain in diverse tumor types. Oncohistones are often dominant-negative and occur at higher frequencies in tumors affecting children and adolescents. Notably, in many cases the mutations target selectively only some of the genes coding the same histone protein and are frequently associated with specific tumor types or, as documented for histone variant H3.3 in pediatric glioma, with peculiar tumors arising from specific anatomic locations.

Conclusion

The overview of the most recent advances suggests that the oncogenic potential of histone mutations can be exerted, together with the alteration of histone PTMs, through the destabilization of nucleosome and DNA–nucleosome interactions, as well as through the disruption of higher-order chromatin structure. However, further studies are necessary to fully elucidate the mechanism of action of oncohistones, as well as to evaluate their possible application to cancer classification, prognosis and to the identification of new therapies.

Linker histone variant H1T functions as a chromatin de-condenser on genic regions

Linker histone H1 is mainly localized in the linker DNA region, between two nucleosome cores, and regulates chromatin structures linking gene expression. There are 11 variants in histone H1, and each variant has unique functions. Our previous study demonstrates that one of the H1 variants, H1T is mainly localized in the nucleolus and targets the rDNA repeat region. Moreover, H1T condenses the chromatin structures on rDNA to repress pre-rRNA expression. Although H1T is partially localized in the nucleoplasm area, the functions of H1T in the non-repeat genic region are unclear. In this study, we aimed to identify the target loci and the role of H1T in the genic region. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis showed that H1T is localized around the transcriptional start site and the chromatin structures of the region were relaxed. H1T knockdown and overexpression experiments revealed that H1T induced chromatin de-condensation and was associated with the increased expression of target genes. Moreover, we observed H1T co-localization with transcriptional factor SPZ1 on the genic region. Collectively, H1T has opposing roles in the genic region and in rDNA repeats; H1T functions to facilitate chromatin relaxation linked gene activation.

Structural Basis of Heterochromatin Formation by Human HP1

Heterochromatin plays important roles in transcriptional silencing and genome maintenance by the formation of condensed chromatin structures, which determine the epigenetic status of eukaryotic cells. The trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3), a target of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1), is a hallmark of heterochromatin formation. However, the mechanism by which HP1 folds chromatin-containing H3K9me3 into a higher-order structure has not been elucidated. Here we report the three-dimensional structure of the H3K9me3-containing dinucleosomes complexed with human HP1α, HP1β, and HP1γ, determined by cryogenic electron microscopy with a Volta phase plate. In the structures, two H3K9me3 nucleosomes are bridged by a symmetric HP1 dimer. Surprisingly, the linker DNA between the nucleosomes does not directly interact with HP1, thus allowing nucleosome remodeling by the ATP-utilizing chromatin assembly and remodeling factor (ACF). The structure depicts the fundamental architecture of heterochromatin.

Structural and biochemical analyses of monoubiquitinated human histones H2B and H4

Monoubiquitination is a major histone post-translational modification. In humans, the histone H2B K120 and histone H4 K31 residues are monoubiquitinated and may form transcriptionally active chromatin. In this study, we reconstituted nucleosomes containing H2B monoubiquitinated at position 120 (H2Bub₁₂₀) and/or H4 monoubiquitinated at position 31 (H4ub₃₁). We found that the H2Bub₁₂₀ and H4ub₃₁ monoubiquitinations differently affect nucleosome stability: the H2Bub₁₂₀ monoubiquitination enhances the H2A–H2B association with the nucleosome, while the H4ub₃₁ monoubiquitination decreases the H3–H4 stability in the nucleosome, when compared with the unmodified nucleosome. The H2Bub₁₂₀ and H4ub₃₁ monoubiquitinations both antagonize the Mg²⁺-dependent compaction of a poly-nucleosome, suggesting that these monoubiquitinations maintain more relaxed conformations of chromatin. In the crystal structure, the H2Bub₁₂₀ and H4ub₃₁ monoubiquitinations do not change the structure of the nucleosome core particle and the ubiquitin molecules were flexibly disordered in the H2Bub₁₂₀/H4ub₃₁ nucleosome structure. These results revealed the differences and similarities of the H2Bub₁₂₀ and H4ub₃₁ monoubiquitinations at the mono- and poly-nucleosome levels and provide novel information to clarify the roles of monoubiquitination in chromatin.

Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein interacts with histones: regulation by acetylated states of histone H3

In the mammalian global genome nucleotide excision repair pathway, two damage recognition factors, XPC and UV-DDB, play pivotal roles in the initiation of the repair reaction. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying regulation of the lesion recognition process in the context of chromatin structures remain to be understood. Here, we show evidence that damage recognition factors tend to associate with chromatin regions devoid of certain types of acetylated histones. Treatment of cells with histone deacetylase inhibitors retarded recruitment of XPC to sites of UV-induced DNA damage and the subsequent repair process. Biochemical studies showed novel multifaceted interactions of XPC with histone H3, which were profoundly impaired by deletion of the N-terminal tail of histone H3. In addition, histone H1 also interacted with XPC. Importantly, acetylation of histone H3 markedly attenuated the interaction with XPC in vitro, and local UV irradiation of cells decreased the level of H3K27ac in the damaged areas. Our results suggest that histone deacetylation plays a significant role in the process of DNA damage recognition for nucleotide excision repair and that the localization and functions of XPC can be regulated by acetylated states of histones.