1
|
Saint-Dizier F, Matthews TP, Gregson AM, Prevet H, McHardy T, Colombano G, Saville H, Rowlands M, Ewens C, McAndrew PC, Tomlin K, Guillotin D, Mak GWY, Drosopoulos K, Poursaitidis I, Burke R, van Montfort R, Linardopoulos S, Collins I. Discovery of 2-(3-Benzamidopropanamido)thiazole-5-carboxylate Inhibitors of the Kinesin HSET (KIFC1) and the Development of Cellular Target Engagement Probes. J Med Chem 2023; 66:2622-2645. [PMID: 36749938 PMCID: PMC9969401 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
The existence of multiple centrosomes in some cancer cells can lead to cell death through the formation of multipolar mitotic spindles and consequent aberrant cell division. Many cancer cells rely on HSET (KIFC1) to cluster the extra centrosomes into two groups to mimic the bipolar spindle formation of non-centrosome-amplified cells and ensure their survival. Here, we report the discovery of a novel 2-(3-benzamidopropanamido)thiazole-5-carboxylate with micromolar in vitro inhibition of HSET (KIFC1) through high-throughput screening and its progression to ATP-competitive compounds with nanomolar biochemical potency and high selectivity against the opposing mitotic kinesin Eg5. Induction of the multipolar phenotype was shown in centrosome-amplified human cancer cells treated with these inhibitors. In addition, a suitable linker position was identified to allow the synthesis of both fluorescent- and trans-cyclooctene (TCO)-tagged probes, which demonstrated direct compound binding to the HSET protein and confirmed target engagement in cells, through a click-chemistry approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Saint-Dizier
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Thomas P. Matthews
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Aaron M. Gregson
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Hugues Prevet
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Tatiana McHardy
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Giampiero Colombano
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Harry Saville
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Martin Rowlands
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Caroline Ewens
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - P. Craig McAndrew
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Kathy Tomlin
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Delphine Guillotin
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Grace Wing-Yan Mak
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | | | - Ioannis Poursaitidis
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Rosemary Burke
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Rob van Montfort
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
- Division
of Structural Biology, The Institute of
Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Spiros Linardopoulos
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
- Breast
Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| | - Ian Collins
- Centre
for Cancer Drug Discovery, Division of Cancer Therapeutics, The Institute of Cancer Research, London SW7 3RP, U.K.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verhelst SHL, Bonger KM, Willems LI. Bioorthogonal Reactions in Activity-Based Protein Profiling. Molecules 2020; 25:E5994. [PMID: 33352858 PMCID: PMC7765892 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25245994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Activity-based protein profiling (ABPP) is a powerful technique to label and detect active enzyme species within cell lysates, cells, or whole animals. In the last two decades, a wide variety of applications and experimental read-out techniques have been pursued in order to increase our understanding of physiological and pathological processes, to identify novel drug targets, to evaluate selectivity of drugs, and to image probe targets in cells. Bioorthogonal chemistry has substantially contributed to the field of ABPP, as it allows the introduction of tags, which may be bulky or have unfavorable physicochemical properties, at a late stage in the experiment. In this review, we give an overview of the bioorthogonal reactions that have been implemented in ABPP, provide examples of applications of bioorthogonal chemistry in ABPP, and share some thoughts on future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven H. L. Verhelst
- Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, KU Leuven, Herestr. 49, Box 802, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- AG Chemical Proteomics, Leibniz Institute for Analytical Sciences ISAS, e.V., Otto-Hahn-Str. 6b, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Kimberly M. Bonger
- Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lianne I. Willems
- York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prevet H, Collins I. Labelled chemical probes for demonstrating direct target engagement in living systems. Future Med Chem 2019; 11:1195-1224. [PMID: 31280668 DOI: 10.4155/fmc-2018-0370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Demonstrating target engagement in living systems can help drive successful drug discovery. Target engagement and occupancy studies in cells confirm direct binding of a ligand to its intended target protein and provide the binding affinity. Combined with biomarkers to measure the functional consequences of target engagement, these experiments can increase confidence in the relationship between in vitro pharmacology and observed biological effects. In this review, we focus on chemically and radioactively labelled probes as key reagents for performing such experiments. Using recent examples, we examine how the labelled probes have been employed in combination with unlabelled ligands to quantify target engagement in cells and in animals. Finally, we consider future developments of this emerging methodology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugues Prevet
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Ian Collins
- Cancer Research UK Cancer Therapeutics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW7 3RP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kidger AM, Sipthorp J, Cook SJ. ERK1/2 inhibitors: New weapons to inhibit the RAS-regulated RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 pathway. Pharmacol Ther 2018; 187:45-60. [PMID: 29454854 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The RAS-regulated RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signalling pathway is de-regulated in a variety of cancers due to mutations in receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), negative regulators of RAS (such as NF1) and core pathway components themselves (RAS, BRAF, CRAF, MEK1 or MEK2). This has driven the development of a variety of pharmaceutical agents to inhibit RAF-MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signalling in cancer and both RAF and MEK inhibitors are now approved and used in the clinic. There is now much interest in targeting at the level of ERK1/2 for a variety of reasons. First, since the pathway is linear from RAF-to-MEK-to-ERK then ERK1/2 are validated as targets per se. Second, innate resistance to RAF or MEK inhibitors involves relief of negative feedback and pathway re-activation with all signalling going through ERK1/2, validating the use of ERK inhibitors with RAF or MEK inhibitors as an up-front combination. Third, long-term acquired resistance to RAF or MEK inhibitors involves a variety of mechanisms (KRAS or BRAF amplification, MEK mutation, etc.) which re-instate ERK activity, validating the use of ERK inhibitors to forestall acquired resistance to RAF or MEK inhibitors. The first potent highly selective ERK1/2 inhibitors have now been developed and are entering clinical trials. They have one of three discrete mechanisms of action - catalytic, "dual mechanism" or covalent - which could have profound consequences for how cells respond and adapt. In this review we describe the validation of ERK1/2 as anti-cancer drug targets, consider the mechanism of action of new ERK1/2 inhibitors and how this may impact on their efficacy, anticipate factors that will determine how tumour cells respond and adapt to ERK1/2 inhibitors and consider ERK1/2 inhibitor drug combinations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Kidger
- Signalling Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, England, United Kingdom.
| | - James Sipthorp
- Signalling Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, England, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J Cook
- Signalling Programme, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge CB22 3AT, England, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shin M, Franks CE, Hsu KL. Isoform-selective activity-based profiling of ERK signaling. Chem Sci 2018; 9:2419-2431. [PMID: 29732117 PMCID: PMC5909473 DOI: 10.1039/c8sc00043c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) mediate downstream signaling of RAS-RAF-MEK as key regulators of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. Activation of ERK signaling is a hallmark of cancer and upstream MAPK proteins have been extensively pursued as drug targets for cancer therapies. However, the rapid rise of resistance to clinical RAF and MEK inhibitors has prompted interest in targeting ERK (ERK1 and ERK2 isoforms) directly for cancer therapy. Current methods for evaluating activity of inhibitors against ERK isoforms are based primarily on analysis of recombinant proteins. Strategies to directly and independently profile native ERK1 and ERK2 activity would greatly complement current cell biological tools used to probe and target ERK function. Here, we present a quantitative chemoproteomic strategy that utilizes active-site directed probes to directly quantify native ERK activity in an isoform-specific fashion. We exploit a single isoleucine/leucine difference in ERK substrate binding sites to enable activity-based profiling of ERK1 versus ERK2 across a variety of cell types, tissues, and species. We used our chemoproteomic strategy to determine potency and selectivity of academic (VX-11e) and clinical (Ulixertinib) ERK inhibitors. Correlation of potency estimates by chemoproteomics with anti-proliferative activity of VX-11e and Ulixertinib revealed that >90% inactivation of both native ERK1 and ERK2 is needed to mediate cellular activity of inhibitors. Our findings introduce one of the first assays capable of independent evaluation of native ERK1 and ERK2 activity to advance drug discovery of oncogenic MAPK pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myungsun Shin
- Department of Chemistry , University of Virginia , McCormick Road, P.O. Box 400319 , Charlottesville , Virginia 22904 , USA . ; Tel: +1-434-297-4864
| | - Caroline E Franks
- Department of Chemistry , University of Virginia , McCormick Road, P.O. Box 400319 , Charlottesville , Virginia 22904 , USA . ; Tel: +1-434-297-4864
| | - Ku-Lung Hsu
- Department of Chemistry , University of Virginia , McCormick Road, P.O. Box 400319 , Charlottesville , Virginia 22904 , USA . ; Tel: +1-434-297-4864
- Department of Pharmacology , University of Virginia , McCormick Road, P.O. Box 400319 , Charlottesville , Virginia 22908 , USA
- University of Virginia Cancer Center , University of Virginia , Charlottesville , VA 22903 , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Protein degradation: a validated therapeutic strategy with exciting prospects. Essays Biochem 2017; 61:517-527. [PMID: 28970340 DOI: 10.1042/ebc20170030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2017] [Revised: 09/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
In a time of unprecedented challenges in developing potent, selective and well-tolerated protein inhibitors as therapeutics, drug hunters are increasingly seeking alternative modalities to modulate pharmacological targets. Selective inhibitors are achievable for only a fraction of the proteome, and are not guaranteed to elicit the desired response in patients, especially when pursuing targets identified through genetic knockdown. Targeted protein degradation holds the potential to expand the range of proteins that can be effectively modulated. Drugs inducing protein degradation through misfolding or by modulating cereblon (CRBN) substrate recognition are already approved for treatment of cancer patients. The last decade has seen the development of proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), small molecules that elicit proteasomal degradation by causing protein polyubiquitination. These have been used to degrade a range of disease-relevant proteins in cells, and some show promising efficacy in preclinical animal models, although their clinical efficacy and tolerability is yet to be proven. This review introduces current strategies for protein degradation with an emphasis on PROTACs and the role of click chemistry in PROTAC research through the formation of libraries of preclicked PROTACs or in-cell click-formed PROTACs (CLIPTACs).
Collapse
|