1
|
Huang Z, Wu X, Luo R. Isotropic Periodic Sum for Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model. J Chem Theory Comput 2025; 21:4040-4050. [PMID: 40194962 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2025]
Abstract
The isotropic periodic sum (IPS) method provides an efficient approach for computing long-range interactions by approximating distant molecular structures through isotropic periodic images of a local region. Here, we present a novel integration of IPS with the polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) model, extending its applicability to systems with Gaussian-distributed charges and dipoles. By developing and implementing the IPS multipole tensor theorem within the Gaussian multipole framework, we derive analytical expressions for IPS potentials that efficiently handle both permanent and induced multipole interactions. Our comprehensive validation includes energy conservation tests in the NVE ensemble, potential energy distributions in the NVT ensemble, structural analysis through radial distribution functions, diffusion coefficients, induced dipole calculations across various molecular systems, and ionic charging free energies. The results demonstrate that the pGM-IPS approach successfully reproduces energetic, structural, and dynamic properties of molecular systems with accuracy comparable to the traditional particle mesh Ewald method. Our work establishes pGM-IPS as a promising method for simulations of polarizable molecular systems, achieving a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Huang
- Chemical and Materials Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine. Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Xiongwu Wu
- Laboratory of Computational Biology, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Chemical and Materials Physics Graduate Program, Departments of Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine. Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dong L, Li P, Wang B. Enhancing MM/P(G)BSA Methods: Integration of Formulaic Entropy for Improved Binding Free Energy Calculations. J Comput Chem 2025; 46:e70093. [PMID: 40197754 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.70093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2025] [Accepted: 03/19/2025] [Indexed: 04/10/2025]
Abstract
Balancing computational efficiency and precision, MM/P(G)BSA methods have been widely employed in the estimation of binding free energies within biological systems. However, the entropy contribution to the binding free energy is often neglected in MM/P(G)BSA calculations, due to the computational cost of conventional methods such as normal mode analysis (NMA). In this work, the entropy effect using a formulaic entropy can be computed from one single structure according to variations in the polar and non-polar solvents accessible surface areas and the count of rotatable bonds in ligands. It was incorporated into MM/P(G)BSA methods to enhance their performance. Extensive benchmarking reveals that the integration of formulaic entropy systematically elevates the performance of both MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA without incurring additional computational expenses. In addition, we found the inclusion of dispersion can deteriorate the correlation performance (Rp) but reduce the root mean square error (RMSE) of both MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA. Notably, MM/PBSA_S, including the formulaic entropy but excluding the dispersion, surpasses all other MM/P(G)BSA methods across a spectrum of datasets. Our investigation furnishes a valuable and practical MM/P(G)BSA method, optimizing binding free energy calculations for a variety of biological systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Dong
- State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering and Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, P. R. China
| | - Pengfei Li
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Binju Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces and Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering and Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Forouzesh N, Ghafouri F, Tolokh IS, Onufriev AV. Optimal Dielectric Boundary for Binding Free Energy Estimates in the Implicit Solvent. J Chem Inf Model 2024; 64:9433-9448. [PMID: 39656550 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2024]
Abstract
Accuracy of binding free energy calculations utilizing implicit solvent models is critically affected by parameters of the underlying dielectric boundary, specifically, the atomic and water probe radii. Here, a multidimensional optimization pipeline is used to find optimal atomic radii, specifically for binding calculations in the implicit solvent. To reduce overfitting, the optimization target includes separate, weighted contributions from both binding and hydration free energies. The resulting five-parameter radii set, OPT_BIND5D, is evaluated against experiment for binding free energies of 20 host-guest (H-G) systems, unrelated to the types of structures used in the training. The resulting accuracy for this H-G test set (root mean square error of 2.03 kcal/mol, mean signed error of -0.13 kcal/mol, mean absolute error of 1.68 kcal/mol, and Pearson's correlation of r = 0.79 with the experimental values) is on par with what can be expected from the fixed charge explicit solvent models. Best agreement with the experiment is achieved when the implicit salt concentration is set equal or close to the experimental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Negin Forouzesh
- Department of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles, California 90032, United States
| | - Fatemeh Ghafouri
- Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Computational Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
| | - Igor S Tolokh
- Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
| | - Alexey V Onufriev
- Department of Computer Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
- Department of Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
- Center for Soft Matter and Biological Physics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhao S, Cieplak P, Duan Y, Luo R. Assessment of Amino Acid Electrostatic Parametrizations of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model. J Chem Theory Comput 2024; 20:2098-2110. [PMID: 38394331 PMCID: PMC11060985 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Accurate parametrization of amino acids is pivotal for the development of reliable force fields for molecular modeling of biomolecules such as proteins. This study aims to assess amino acid electrostatic parametrizations with the polarizable Gaussian Multipole (pGM) model by evaluating the performance of the pGM-perm (with atomic permanent dipoles) and pGM-ind (without atomic permanent dipoles) variants compared to the traditional RESP model. The 100-conf-combterm fitting strategy on tetrapeptides was adopted, in which (1) all peptide bond atoms (-CO-NH-) share identical set of parameters and (2) the total charges of the two terminal N-acetyl (ACE) and N-methylamide (NME) groups were set to neutral. The accuracy and transferability of electrostatic parameters across peptides with varying lengths and real-world examples were examined. The results demonstrate the enhanced performance of the pGM-perm model in accurately representing the electrostatic properties of amino acids. This insight underscores the potential of the pGM-perm model and the 100-conf-combterm strategy for the future development of the pGM force field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiji Zhao
- Nurix Therapeutics, Inc., 1700 Owens St. Suite 205, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine. Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Case D, Aktulga HM, Belfon K, Cerutti DS, Cisneros GA, Cruzeiro VD, Forouzesh N, Giese TJ, Götz AW, Gohlke H, Izadi S, Kasavajhala K, Kaymak MC, King E, Kurtzman T, Lee TS, Li P, Liu J, Luchko T, Luo R, Manathunga M, Machado MR, Nguyen HM, O’Hearn KA, Onufriev AV, Pan F, Pantano S, Qi R, Rahnamoun A, Risheh A, Schott-Verdugo S, Shajan A, Swails J, Wang J, Wei H, Wu X, Wu Y, Zhang S, Zhao S, Zhu Q, Cheatham TE, Roe DR, Roitberg A, Simmerling C, York DM, Nagan MC, Merz KM. AmberTools. J Chem Inf Model 2023; 63:6183-6191. [PMID: 37805934 PMCID: PMC10598796 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 569] [Impact Index Per Article: 284.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
AmberTools is a free and open-source collection of programs used to set up, run, and analyze molecular simulations. The newer features contained within AmberTools23 are briefly described in this Application note.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David
A. Case
- Department
of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers
University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Hasan Metin Aktulga
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Kellon Belfon
- FOG
Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge 02140, Massachusetts, United States
| | - David S. Cerutti
- Psivant, 451 D Street, Suite 205, Boston 02210, Massachusetts, United States
| | - G. Andrés Cisneros
- Department
of Physics, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson 75801, Texas, United States
| | - Vinícius
Wilian D. Cruzeiro
- Department
of Chemistry and The PULSE Institute, Stanford
University, Stanford 94305, California, United States
| | - Negin Forouzesh
- Department
of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles 90032, California, United States
| | - Timothy J. Giese
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Andreas W. Götz
- San
Diego Supercomputer Center, University of
California San Diego, La Jolla 92093-0505, California, United States
| | - Holger Gohlke
- Institute
for Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany
- Institute
of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | - Saeed Izadi
- Pharmaceutical
Development, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco 94080, California, United
States
| | - Koushik Kasavajhala
- Laufer
Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Mehmet C. Kaymak
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Edward King
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Tom Kurtzman
- Ph.D.
Programs in Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Biology, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York 10016, New York, United States
- Department
of Chemistry, Lehman College, 250 Bedford Park Blvd West, Bronx 10468, New York, United States
| | - Tai-Sung Lee
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Pengfei Li
- Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Loyola University
Chicago, Chicago 60660, Illinois, United States
| | - Jian Liu
- Beijing
National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, Institute of Theoretical
and Computational Chemistry, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
| | - Tyler Luchko
- Department
of Physics and Astronomy, California State
University, Northridge, Northridge 91330, California, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Madushanka Manathunga
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | | | - Hai Minh Nguyen
- Department
of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers
University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Kurt A. O’Hearn
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Alexey V. Onufriev
- Departments
of Computer Science and Physics, Virginia
Tech, Blacksburg 24061, Virginia, United
States
| | - Feng Pan
- Department
of Statistics, Florida State University, Tallahassee 32304, Florida, United States
| | - Sergio Pantano
- Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo 11400, Uruguay
| | - Ruxi Qi
- Cryo-EM
Center, Southern University of Science and
Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| | - Ali Rahnamoun
- Department
of Computer Science and Engineering, Michigan
State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Ali Risheh
- Department
of Computer Science, California State University, Los Angeles 90032, California, United States
| | - Stephan Schott-Verdugo
- Institute
of Bio- and Geosciences (IBG-4: Bioinformatics), Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich 52425, Germany
| | - Akhil Shajan
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| | - Jason Swails
- Entos, 4470 W Sunset
Blvd, Suite 107, Los Angeles 90027, California, United States
| | - Junmei Wang
- Department
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh 15261, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Haixin Wei
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Xiongwu Wu
- Laboratory
of Computational Biology, NHLBI, NIH, Bethesda 20892, Maryland, United States
| | - Yongxian Wu
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Shi Zhang
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Shiji Zhao
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
- Nurix Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco 94158, California, United States
| | - Qiang Zhu
- Departments
of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering,
Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, Graduate
Program in Chemical and Materials Physics, University of California, Irvine 92697, California, United States
| | - Thomas E. Cheatham
- Department
of Medicinal Chemistry, The University of
Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City 84112, Utah, United
States
| | - Daniel R. Roe
- Laboratory
of Computational Biology, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda 20892, Maryland, United States
| | - Adrian Roitberg
- Department
of Chemistry, The University of Florida, 440 Leigh Hall, Gainesville 32611-7200, Florida, United States
| | - Carlos Simmerling
- Laufer
Center for Physical and Quantitative Biology, Department of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Darrin M. York
- Laboratory
for Biomolecular Simulation Research, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine
and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, Piscataway 08854, New Jersey, United States
| | - Maria C. Nagan
- Department
of Chemistry, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook 11794, New York, United States
| | - Kenneth M. Merz
- Department
of Chemistry and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1322, Michigan, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao S, Cieplak P, Duan Y, Luo R. Transferability of the Electrostatic Parameters of the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model. J Chem Theory Comput 2023; 19:924-941. [PMID: 36696564 PMCID: PMC10152989 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c01048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Accuracy and transferability are the two highly desirable properties of molecular mechanical force fields. Compared with the extensively used point-charge additive force fields that apply fixed atom-centered point partial charges to model electrostatic interactions, polarizable force fields are thought to have the advantage of modeling the atomic polarization effects. Previous works have demonstrated the accuracy of the recently developed polarizable Gaussian multipole (pGM) models. In this work, we assessed the transferability of the electrostatic parameters of the pGM models with (pGM-perm) and without (pGM-ind) atomic permanent dipoles in terms of reproducing the electrostatic potentials surrounding molecules/oligomers absent from electrostatic parameterizations. Encouragingly, both the pGM-perm and pGM-ind models show significantly improved transferability than the additive model in the tests (1) from water monomer to water oligomer clusters; (2) across different conformations of amino acid dipeptides and tetrapeptides; (3) from amino acid tetrapeptides to longer polypeptides; and (4) from nucleobase monomers to Watson-Crick base pair dimers and tetramers. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the double-conformation fittings using amino acid tetrapeptides in the αR and β conformations can result in good transferability not only across different tetrapeptide conformations but also from tetrapeptides to polypeptides with lengths ranging from 1 to 20 repetitive residues for both the pGM-ind and pGM-perm models. In addition, the observation that the pGM-ind model has significantly better accuracy and transferability than the point-charge additive model, even though they have an identical number of parameters, strongly suggest the importance of intramolecular polarization effects. In summary, this and previous works together show that the pGM models possess both accuracy and transferability, which are expected to serve as foundations for the development of next-generation polarizable force fields for modeling various polarization-sensitive biological systems and processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiji Zhao
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Żak A, Łazarski G, Wytrwal-Sarna M, Jamróz D, Górniewicz M, Foryś A, Trzebicka B, Kepczynski M. Molecular insights into the self-assembly of hydrophobically modified chondroitin sulfate in aqueous media. Carbohydr Polym 2022; 297:119999. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
8
|
The Importance of Charge Transfer and Solvent Screening in the Interactions of Backbones and Functional Groups in Amino Acid Residues and Nucleotides. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232113514. [PMID: 36362296 PMCID: PMC9654426 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantum mechanical (QM) calculations at the level of density-functional tight-binding are applied to a protein–DNA complex (PDB: 2o8b) consisting of 3763 atoms, averaging 100 snapshots from molecular dynamics simulations. A detailed comparison of QM and force field (Amber) results is presented. It is shown that, when solvent screening is taken into account, the contributions of the backbones are small, and the binding of nucleotides in the double helix is governed by the base–base interactions. On the other hand, the backbones can make a substantial contribution to the binding of amino acid residues to nucleotides and other residues. The effect of charge transfer on the interactions is also analyzed, revealing that the actual charge of nucleotides and amino acid residues can differ by as much as 6 and 8% from the formal integer charge, respectively. The effect of interactions on topological models (protein -residue networks) is elucidated.
Collapse
|
9
|
Fu H, Zhou Y, Jing X, Shao X, Cai W. Meta-Analysis Reveals That Absolute Binding Free-Energy Calculations Approach Chemical Accuracy. J Med Chem 2022; 65:12970-12978. [PMID: 36179112 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c00796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Systematic and quantitative analysis of the reliability of formally exact methods that in silico calculate absolute protein-ligand binding free energies remains lacking. Here, we provide, for the first time, evidence-based information on the reliability of these methods by statistically studying 853 cases from 34 different research groups through meta-analysis. The results show that formally exact methods approach chemical accuracy (error = 1.58 kcal/mol), even if people are challenging difficult tasks such as blind drug screening in recent years. The geometrical-pathway-based methods prove to possess a better convergence ability than the alchemical ones, while the latter have a larger application range. We also reveal the importance of always using the latest force fields to guarantee reliability and discuss the pros and cons of turning to an implicit solvent model in absolute binding free-energy calculations. Moreover, based on the meta-analysis, an evidence-based guideline for in silico binding free-energy calculations is provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haohao Fu
- Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China.,Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin300192, China
| | - Yan Zhou
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China.,Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin300170, China
| | - Xiang Jing
- Department of Ultrasound, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Tianjin300170, China
| | - Xueguang Shao
- Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China.,Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin300192, China
| | - Wensheng Cai
- Research Center for Analytical Sciences, Frontiers Science Center for New Organic Matter, College of Chemistry, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Biosensing and Molecular Recognition, State Key Laboratory of Medicinal Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin300071, China.,Haihe Laboratory of Sustainable Chemical Transformations, Tianjin300192, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhao S, Wei H, Cieplak P, Duan Y, Luo R. Accurate Reproduction of Quantum Mechanical Many-Body Interactions in Peptide Main-Chain Hydrogen-Bonding Oligomers by the Polarizable Gaussian Multipole Model. J Chem Theory Comput 2022; 18:6172-6188. [PMID: 36094401 PMCID: PMC10152986 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A key advantage of polarizable force fields is their ability to model the atomic polarization effects that play key roles in the atomic many-body interactions. In this work, we assessed the accuracy of the recently developed polarizable Gaussian Multipole (pGM) models in reproducing quantum mechanical (QM) interaction energies, many-body interaction energies, as well as the nonadditive and additive contributions to the many-body interactions for peptide main-chain hydrogen-bonding conformers, using glycine dipeptide oligomers as the model systems. Two types of pGM models were considered, including that with (pGM-perm) and without (pGM-ind) permanent atomic dipoles. The performances of the pGM models were compared with several widely used force fields, including two polarizable (Amoeba13 and ff12pol) and three additive (ff19SB, ff15ipq, and ff03) force fields. Encouragingly, the pGM models outperform all other force fields in terms of reproducing QM interaction energies, many-body interaction energies, as well as the nonadditive and additive contributions to the many-body interactions, as measured by the root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) and mean absolute errors (MAEs). Furthermore, we tested the robustness of the pGM models against polarizability parameterization errors by employing alternative polarizabilities that are either scaled or obtained from other force fields. The results show that the pGM models with alternative polarizabilities exhibit improved accuracy in reproducing QM many-body interaction energies as well as the nonadditive and additive contributions compared with other polarizable force fields, suggesting that the pGM models are robust against the errors in polarizability parameterizations. This work shows that the pGM models are capable of accurately modeling polarization effects and have the potential to serve as templates for developing next-generation polarizable force fields for modeling various biological systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiji Zhao
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Haixin Wei
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| | - Piotr Cieplak
- SBP Medical Discovery Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States
| | - Yong Duan
- UC Davis Genome Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fedorov DG. Polarization energies in the fragment molecular orbital method. J Comput Chem 2022; 43:1094-1103. [PMID: 35446441 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.26869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Using isolated and polarized states of fragments, a method for computing the polarization energies in density functional theory (DFT) and density-functional tight-binding (DFTB) is developed in the framework of the fragment molecular orbital method. For DFTB, the method is extended into the use of periodic boundary conditions (PBC), for which a new component, a periodic self-polarization energy, is derived. The couplings of the polarization to other components in the pair interaction energy analysis (PIEDA) are derived for DFT and DFTB, and compared to Hartree-Fock and second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2). The effect of the self-consistent (DFT) and perturbative (MP2) treatment of the electron correlation on the polarization is discussed. The difference in the polarization in the bulk (PBC) and micro (cluster) solvation is elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dmitri G Fedorov
- Research Center for Computational Design of Advanced Functional Materials (CD-FMat), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Byun J, Lee J. Identifying the Hot Spot Residues of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease Using MM-PBSA and Multiple Force Fields. Life (Basel) 2021; 12:54. [PMID: 35054447 PMCID: PMC8779590 DOI: 10.3390/life12010054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the binding affinities between the main protease of SARS-CoV-2 virus (Mpro) and its various ligands to identify the hot spot residues of the protease. To benchmark the influence of various force fields on hot spot residue identification and binding free energy calculation, we performed MD simulations followed by MM-PBSA analysis with three different force fields: CHARMM36, AMBER99SB, and GROMOS54a7. We performed MD simulations with 100 ns for 11 protein-ligand complexes. From the series of MD simulations and MM-PBSA calculations, it is identified that the MM-PBSA estimations using different force fields are weakly correlated to each other. From a comparison between the force fields, AMBER99SB and GROMOS54a7 results are fairly correlated while CHARMM36 results show weak or almost no correlations with the others. Our results suggest that MM-PBSA analysis results strongly depend on force fields and should be interpreted carefully. Additionally, we identified the hot spot residues of Mpro, which play critical roles in ligand binding through energy decomposition analysis. It is identified that the residues of the S4 subsite of the binding site, N142, M165, and R188, contribute strongly to ligand binding. In addition, the terminal residues, D295, R298, and Q299 are identified to have attractive interactions with ligands via electrostatic and solvation energy. We believe that our findings will help facilitate developing the novel inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Juyong Lee
- Department of Chemistry, Division of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
King E, Aitchison E, Li H, Luo R. Recent Developments in Free Energy Calculations for Drug Discovery. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8:712085. [PMID: 34458321 PMCID: PMC8387144 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.712085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The grand challenge in structure-based drug design is achieving accurate prediction of binding free energies. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations enable modeling of conformational changes critical to the binding process, leading to calculation of thermodynamic quantities involved in estimation of binding affinities. With recent advancements in computing capability and predictive accuracy, MD based virtual screening has progressed from the domain of theoretical attempts to real application in drug development. Approaches including the Molecular Mechanics Poisson Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA), Linear Interaction Energy (LIE), and alchemical methods have been broadly applied to model molecular recognition for drug discovery and lead optimization. Here we review the varied methodology of these approaches, developments enhancing simulation efficiency and reliability, remaining challenges hindering predictive performance, and applications to problems in the fields of medicine and biochemistry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward King
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Erick Aitchison
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Han Li
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Ray Luo
- Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
- Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|