1
|
Steiner WP, Iverson N, Venkatakrishnan V, Wu J, Stepniewski TM, Michaelson Z, Bröckel JW, Zhu JF, Bruystens J, Lee A, Nelson I, Bertinetti D, Arveseth CD, Tan G, Spaltenstein P, Xu J, Hüttenhain R, Kay M, Herberg FW, Selent J, Anand GS, Dunbrack RL, Taylor SS, Myers BR. A Structural Mechanism for Noncanonical GPCR Signal Transduction in the Hedgehog Pathway. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.10.31.621410. [PMID: 39554190 PMCID: PMC11565934 DOI: 10.1101/2024.10.31.621410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
The Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway is fundamental to embryogenesis, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Hh signals are transduced via an unusual mechanism: upon agonist-induced phosphorylation, the noncanonical G protein-coupled receptor SMOOTHENED (SMO) binds the catalytic subunit of protein kinase A (PKA-C) and physically blocks its enzymatic activity. By combining computational structural approaches with biochemical and functional studies, we show that SMO mimics strategies prevalent in canonical GPCR and PKA signaling complexes, despite little sequence or secondary structural homology. An intrinsically disordered region of SMO binds the PKA-C active site, resembling the PKA regulatory subunit (PKA-R) / PKA-C holoenzyme, while the SMO transmembrane domain binds a conserved PKA-C interaction hub, similar to other GPCR-effector complexes. In contrast with prevailing GPCR signal transduction models, phosphorylation of SMO promotes intramolecular electrostatic interactions that stabilize key structural elements within the SMO cytoplasmic domain, thereby remodeling it into a PKA-inhibiting conformation. Our work provides a structural mechanism for a central step in the Hh cascade and defines a paradigm for disordered GPCR domains to transmit signals intracellularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William P. Steiner
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Nathan Iverson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | - Jian Wu
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Tomasz Maciej Stepniewski
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) – Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona, Spain
- InterAx Biotech AG, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Zachary Michaelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jan W. Bröckel
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Ju-Fen Zhu
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jessica Bruystens
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Annabel Lee
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Isaac Nelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daniela Bertinetti
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Corvin D. Arveseth
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Gerald Tan
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Paul Spaltenstein
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jiewei Xu
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ruth Hüttenhain
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Michael Kay
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Friedrich W. Herberg
- Institute for Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
| | - Jana Selent
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics (GRIB), Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) – Pompeu Fabra University (UPF), Dr Aiguader 88, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ganesh S. Anand
- Department of Chemistry, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
- The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Roland L. Dunbrack
- Institute for Cancer Research. Fox Chase Cancer Center. Philadelphia PA, USA
| | - Susan S. Taylor
- Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin R. Myers
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim K, Bansal PD, Shukla D. Cyclopamine modulates smoothened receptor activity in a binding position dependent manner. Commun Biol 2024; 7:1207. [PMID: 39342033 PMCID: PMC11438977 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06906-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Cyclopamine, a natural alkaloid, can act as an agonist when it binds to the Cysteine-Rich Domain (CRD) of Smoothened receptor and as an antagonist when it binds to the Transmembrane Domain (TMD). To study the effect of cyclopamine binding to each site experimentally, mutations in the other site are required. Hence, simulations are critical for understanding the WT activity due to binding at different sites. Using multi-milliseconds long aggregate MD simulations combined with Markov state models and machine learning, we explore the dynamic behavior of cyclopamine's interactions with different domains of WT SMO. A higher population of the active state at equilibrium, a lower free energy barrier of ~2 kcal/mol, and expansion of hydrophobic tunnel to facilitate cholesterol transport agrees with cyclopamine's agonistic behavior when bound to CRD. A higher population of the inactive state at equilibrium, a higher free energy barrier of ~4 kcal/mol and restricted hydrophobic tunnel shows cyclopamine's antagonistic behavior when bound to TMD. With cyclopamine bound to both sites, there is a slightly larger inactive population at equilibrium and an increased free energy barrier (~3.5 kcal/mol) exhibiting an overall weak antagonistic effect. These findings show cyclopamine's domain-specific modulation of SMO regulates Hedgehog signaling and cholesterol transport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kihong Kim
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Prateek D Bansal
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Diwakar Shukla
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
- Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
- Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim K, Bansal PD, Shukla D. Binding Position Dependent Modulation of Smoothened Activity by Cyclopamine. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.08.579369. [PMID: 38405881 PMCID: PMC10888922 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.08.579369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Cyclopamine is a natural alkaloid that is known to act as an agonist when it binds to the Cysteine Rich Domain (CRD) of the Smoothened receptor and as an antagonist when it binds to the Transmembrane Domain (TMD). To study the effect of cyclopamine binding to each binding site experimentally, mutations in the other site are required. Hence, simulations are critical for understanding the WT activity due to binding at different sites. Additionally, there is a possibility that cyclopamine could bind to both sites simultaneously especially at high concentration, the implications of which remain unknown. We performed three independent sets of simulations to observe the receptor activation with cyclopamine bound to each site independently (CRD, TMD) and bound to both sites simultaneously. Using multi-milliseconds long aggregate MD simulations combined with Markov state models and machine learning, we explored the dynamic behavior of cyclopamine's interactions with different domains of WT SMO. A higher population of the active state at equilibrium, a lower activation free energy barrier of ~ 2 kcal/mol, and expansion of the hydrophobic tunnel to facilitate cholesterol transport agrees with the cyclopamine's agonistic behavior when bound to the CRD of SMO. A higher population of the inactive state at equilibrium, a higher free energy barrier of ~ 4 kcal/mol and restricted the hydrophobic tunnel to impede cholesterol transport showed cyclopamine's antagonistic behavior when bound to TMD. With cyclopamine bound to both sites, there was a slightly larger inactive population at equilibrium and an increased free energy barrier (~ 3.5 kcal/mol). The tunnel was slightly larger than when solely bound to TMD, and showed a balance between agonism and antagonism with respect to residue movements exhibiting an overall weak antagonistic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kihong Kim
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
| | - Prateek D Bansal
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
| | - Diwakar Shukla
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
- Center for Biophysics and Quantitative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
- Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, United States
| |
Collapse
|