Accurately Assigning Peptides to Spectra When Only a Subset of Peptides Are Relevant

Emerging protein sequencing technologies: proteomics without mass spectrometry?

INTRODUCTION

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) has been a leading method for proteomics for 30 years. Advantages provided by LC-MS/MS are offset by significant disadvantages, including cost. Recently, several non-mass spectrometric methods have emerged, but little information is available about their capacity to analyze the complex mixtures routine for mass spectrometry.

AREAS COVERED

We review recent non-mass-spectrometric methods for sequencing proteins and peptides, including those using nanopores, sequencing by degradation, reverse translation, and short-epitope mapping, with comments on bioinformatics challenges, fundamental limitations, and areas where new technologies will be more or less competitive with LC-MS/MS. In addition to conventional literature searches, instrument vendor websites, patents, webinars, and preprints were also consulted to give a more up-to-date picture.

EXPERT OPINION

Many new technologies are promising. However, demonstrations that they outperform mass spectrometry in terms of peptides and proteins identified have not yet been published, and astute observers note important disadvantages, especially relating to the dynamic range of single-molecule measurements of complex mixtures. Still, even if the performance of emerging methods proves inferior to LC-MS/MS, their low cost could create a different kind of revolution: a dramatic increase in the number of biology laboratories engaging in new forms of proteomics research.

Deep Learning Enhances Precision of Citrullination Identification in Human and Plant Tissue Proteomes

Citrullination is a critical yet understudied post-translational modification (PTM) implicated in various biological processes. Exploring its role in health and disease requires a comprehensive understanding of the prevalence of this PTM at a proteome-wide scale. Although mass spectrometry has enabled the identification of citrullination sites in complex biological samples, it faces significant challenges, including limited enrichment tools and a high rate of false positives due to the identical mass with deamidation (+0.9840 Da) and errors in monoisotopic ion selection. These issues often necessitate manual spectrum inspection, reducing throughput in large-scale studies. In this work, we present a novel data analysis pipeline that incorporates the deep learning model Prosit-Cit into the MS database search workflow to improve both the sensitivity and the precision of citrullination site identification. Prosit-Cit, an extension of the existing Prosit model, has been trained on ∼53,000 spectra from ∼2500 synthetic citrullinated peptides and provides precise predictions for chromatographic retention time and fragment ion intensities of both citrullinated and deamidated peptides. This enhances the accuracy of identification and reduces false positives. Our pipeline demonstrated high precision on the evaluation dataset, recovering the majority of known citrullination sites in human tissue proteomes and improving sensitivity by identifying up to 14 times more citrullinated sites. Sequence motif analysis revealed consistency with previously reported findings, validating the reliability of our approach. Furthermore, extending the pipeline to a tissue proteome dataset of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana enabled the identification of ∼200 citrullination sites across 169 proteins from 30 tissues, representing the first large-scale citrullination mapping in plants. This pipeline can be seamlessly applied to existing proteomics datasets, offering a robust tool for advancing biological discoveries and deepening our understanding of protein citrullination across species.

Detecting Human Contaminant Genetically Variant Peptides in Nonhuman Samples

During proteomics data analysis, experimental spectra are searched against a user-defined protein database consisting of proteins that are reasonably expected to be present in the sample. Typically, this database contains the proteome of the organism under study concatenated with expected contaminants, such as trypsin and human keratins. However, there are additional contaminants that are not commonly added to the database. In this study, we describe a new set of protein contaminants and provide evidence that they can be detected in mass spectrometry-based proteomics data. Specifically, we provide evidence that human genetically variant peptides (GVPs) can be detected in nonhuman samples. GVPs are peptides that contain single amino acid polymorphisms that result from nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms in protein-coding regions of DNA. We reanalyzed previously collected nonhuman data-dependent acquisition (DDA) and data-independent acquisition (DIA) data sets and detected between 0 and 135 GVPs per data set. In addition, we show that GVPs are unlikely to originate from nonhuman sources and that a subset of eight GVPs are commonly detected across data sets.

Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry

Proteomics is the large scale study of protein structure and function from biological systems through protein identification and quantification. "Shotgun proteomics" or "bottom-up proteomics" is the prevailing strategy, in which proteins are hydrolyzed into peptides that are analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomics studies can be applied to diverse studies ranging from simple protein identification to studies of proteoforms, protein-protein interactions, protein structural alterations, absolute and relative protein quantification, post-translational modifications, and protein stability. To enable this range of different experiments, there are diverse strategies for proteome analysis. The nuances of how proteomic workflows differ may be challenging to understand for new practitioners. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of different proteomics methods. We cover from biochemistry basics and protein extraction to biological interpretation and orthogonal validation. We expect this Review will serve as a handbook for researchers who are new to the field of bottom-up proteomics.

Analysis of Tandem Mass Spectrometry Data with CONGA: Combining Open and Narrow Searches with Group-Wise Analysis

Searching for tandem mass spectrometry proteomics data against a database is a well-established method for assigning peptide sequences to observed spectra but typically cannot identify peptides harboring unexpected post-translational modifications (PTMs). Open modification searching aims to address this problem by allowing a spectrum to match a peptide even if the spectrum's precursor mass differs from the peptide mass. However, expanding the search space in this way can lead to a loss of statistical power to detect peptides. We therefore developed a method, called CONGA (combining open and narrow searches with group-wise analysis), that takes into account results from both types of searches─a traditional "narrow window" search and an open modification search─while carrying out rigorous false discovery rate control. The result is an algorithm that provides the best of both worlds: the ability to detect unexpected PTMs without a concomitant loss of power to detect unmodified peptides.

Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics using Mass Spectrometry

Proteomics is the large scale study of protein structure and function from biological systems through protein identification and quantification. "Shotgun proteomics" or "bottom-up proteomics" is the prevailing strategy, in which proteins are hydrolyzed into peptides that are analyzed by mass spectrometry. Proteomics studies can be applied to diverse studies ranging from simple protein identification to studies of proteoforms, protein-protein interactions, protein structural alterations, absolute and relative protein quantification, post-translational modifications, and protein stability. To enable this range of different experiments, there are diverse strategies for proteome analysis. The nuances of how proteomic workflows differ may be challenging to understand for new practitioners. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of different proteomics methods to aid the novice and experienced researcher. We cover from biochemistry basics and protein extraction to biological interpretation and orthogonal validation. We expect this work to serve as a basic resource for new practitioners in the field of shotgun or bottom-up proteomics.

Challenging Targets or Describing Mismatches? A Comment on Common Decoy Distribution by Madej et al

In their recent article, Madej et al. (Madej, D.; Wu, L.; Lam, H.Common Decoy Distributions Simplify False Discovery Rate Estimation in Shotgun Proteomics. J. Proteome Res.2022, 21 (2), 339-348) proposed an original way to solve the recurrent issue of controlling for the false discovery rate (FDR) in peptide-spectrum-match (PSM) validation. Briefly, they proposed to derive a single precise distribution of decoy matches termed the Common Decoy Distribution (CDD) and to use it to control for FDR during a target-only search. Conceptually, this approach is appealing as it takes the best of two worlds, i.e., decoy-based approaches (which leverage a large-scale collection of empirical mismatches) and decoy-free approaches (which are not subject to the randomness of decoy generation while sparing an additional database search). Interestingly, CDD also corresponds to a middle-of-the-road approach in statistics with respect to the two main families of FDR control procedures: Although historically based on estimating the false-positive distribution, FDR control has recently been demonstrated to be possible thanks to competition between the original variables (in proteomics, target sequences) and their fictional counterparts (in proteomics, decoys). Discriminating between these two theoretical trends is of prime importance for computational proteomics. In addition to highlighting why proteomics was a source of inspiration for theoretical biostatistics, it provides practical insights into the improvements that can be made to FDR control methods used in proteomics, including CDD.

Improving Peptide-Level Mass Spectrometry Analysis via Double Competition

The analysis of shotgun proteomics data often involves generating lists of inferred peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) and/or of peptides. The canonical approach for generating these discovery lists is by controlling the false discovery rate (FDR), most commonly through target-decoy competition (TDC). At the PSM level, TDC is implemented by competing each spectrum's best-scoring target (real) peptide match with its best match against a decoy database. This PSM-level procedure can be adapted to the peptide level by selecting the top-scoring PSM per peptide prior to FDR estimation. Here, we first highlight and empirically augment a little known previous work by He et al., which showed that TDC-based PSM-level FDR estimates can be liberally biased. We thus propose that researchers instead focus on peptide-level analysis. We then investigate three ways to carry out peptide-level TDC and show that the most common method ("PSM-only") offers the lowest statistical power in practice. An alternative approach that carries out a double competition, first at the PSM and then at the peptide level ("PSM-and-peptide"), is the most powerful method, yielding an average increase of 17% more discovered peptides at 1% FDR threshold relative to the PSM-only method.

An analysis of proteogenomics and how and when transcriptome-informed reduction of protein databases can enhance eukaryotic proteomics

BACKGROUND

Proteogenomics aims to identify variant or unknown proteins in bottom-up proteomics, by searching transcriptome- or genome-derived custom protein databases. However, empirical observations reveal that these large proteogenomic databases produce lower-sensitivity peptide identifications. Various strategies have been proposed to avoid this, including the generation of reduced transcriptome-informed protein databases, which only contain proteins whose transcripts are detected in the sample-matched transcriptome. These were found to increase peptide identification sensitivity. Here, we present a detailed evaluation of this approach.

RESULTS

We establish that the increased sensitivity in peptide identification is in fact a statistical artifact, directly resulting from the limited capability of target-decoy competition to accurately model incorrect target matches when using excessively small databases. As anti-conservative false discovery rates (FDRs) are likely to hamper the robustness of the resulting biological conclusions, we advocate for alternative FDR control methods that are less sensitive to database size. Nevertheless, reduced transcriptome-informed databases are useful, as they reduce the ambiguity of protein identifications, yielding fewer shared peptides. Furthermore, searching the reference database and subsequently filtering proteins whose transcripts are not expressed reduces protein identification ambiguity to a similar extent, but is more transparent and reproducible.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, using transcriptome information is an interesting strategy that has not been promoted for the right reasons. While the increase in peptide identifications from searching reduced transcriptome-informed databases is an artifact caused by the use of an FDR control method unsuitable to excessively small databases, transcriptome information can reduce the ambiguity of protein identifications.

Building Spectral Libraries from Narrow-Window Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry Data

Advances in library-based methods for peptide detection from data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry have made it possible to detect and quantify tens of thousands of peptides in a single mass spectrometry run. However, many of these methods rely on a comprehensive, high-quality spectral library containing information about the expected retention time and fragmentation patterns of peptides in the sample. Empirical spectral libraries are often generated through data-dependent acquisition and may suffer from biases as a result. Spectral libraries can be generated in silico, but these models are not trained to handle all possible post-translational modifications. Here, we propose a false discovery rate-controlled spectrum-centric search workflow to generate spectral libraries directly from gas-phase fractionated DIA tandem mass spectrometry data. We demonstrate that this strategy is able to detect phosphorylated peptides and can be used to generate a spectral library for accurate peptide detection and quantitation in wide-window DIA data. We compare the results of this search workflow to other library-free approaches and demonstrate that our search is competitive in terms of accuracy and sensitivity. These results demonstrate that the proposed workflow has the capacity to generate spectral libraries while avoiding the limitations of other methods.

Considerations for Constructing a Protein Sequence Database for Metaproteomics

Mass spectrometry-based metaproteomics has emerged as a prominent technique for interrogating the functions of specific organisms in microbial communities, in addition to total community function. Identifying proteins by mass spectrometry requires matching mass spectra of fragmented peptide ions to a database of protein sequences corresponding to the proteins in the sample. This sequence database determines which protein sequences can be identified from the measurement, and as such the taxonomic and functional information that can be inferred from a metaproteomics measurement. Thus, the construction of the protein sequence database directly impacts the outcome of any metaproteomics study. Several factors, such as source of sequence information and database curation, need to be considered during database construction to maximize accurate protein identifications traceable to the species of origin. In this review, we provide an overview of existing strategies for database construction and the relevant studies that have sought to test and validate these strategies. Based on this review of the literature and our experience we provide a decision tree and best practices for choosing and implementing database construction strategies.