Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Enriched Nuclear Fractions from BK Polyomavirus-Infected Primary Renal Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells

Single-Cell Transcriptome Identifies the Renal Cell Type Tropism of Human BK Polyomavirus

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection is the main factor affecting the prognosis of kidney transplant recipients, as no antiviral agent is yet available. A better understanding of the renal-cell-type tropism of BKPyV can serve to develop new treatment strategies. In this study, the single-cell transcriptomic analysis demonstrated that the ranking of BKPyV tropism for the kidney was proximal tubule cells (PT), collecting duct cells (CD), and glomerular endothelial cells (GEC) according to the signature of renal cell type and immune microenvironment. In normal kidneys, we found that BKPyV infection-related transcription factors P65 and CEBPB were PT-specific transcription factors, and PT showed higher glycolysis/gluconeogenesis activities than CD and GEC. Furthermore, in the BKPyV-infected kidneys, the percentage of late viral transcripts in PT was significantly higher than in CD and GEC. In addition, PT had the smallest cell-cell interactions with immune cells compared to CD and GEC in both normal and BKPyV-infected kidneys. Subsequently, we indirectly demonstrated the ranking of BKPyV tropism via the clinical observation of sequential biopsies. Together, our results provided in-depth insights into the renal cell-type tropism of BKPyV in vivo at single-cell resolution and proposed a novel antiviral target.

Proteomic analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles of kidney transplant recipients with BKV viruria and viremia: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

To better define the biological machinery associated with BK virus (BKV) infection, in kidney transplantation, we performed a proteomics analysis of urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs).

METHODS

Twenty-nine adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with normal allograft function affected by BKV infection (15 with only viremia, 14 with viruria and viremia) and 15 controls (CTR, KTRs without BKV infection) were enrolled and randomly divided in a training cohort (12 BKV and 6 CTR) used for the mass spectrometry analysis of the EVs (microvesicles and exosomes) protein content and a testing cohort (17 BKV and 9 CTR) used for the biological validation of the proteomic results by ELISA. Bioinformatics and functional analysis revealed that several biological processes were enriched in BKV (including immunity, complement activation, renal fibrosis) and were able to discriminate BKV vs. CTR. Kinase was the only gene ontology annotation term including proteins less abundant in BKV (with SLK being the most significantly down-regulated protein). Non-linear support vector machine (SVM) learning and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) identified 36 proteins (including DNASE2, F12, AGT, CTSH, C4A, C7, FABP4, and BPNT1) able to discriminate the two study groups. The proteomic profile of KTRs with BKV viruria alone vs. viremia and viruria was quite similar. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for SLK, BPNT1 and DNASE2, performed on testing cohort, validated proteomics results.

DISCUSSIONS

Our pilot study demonstrated, for the first time, that BKV infection, also in the viruric state, can have a negative impact on the allograft and it suggested that, whether possible, an early preventive therapeutic strategy should be undertaken also in KTRs with viruria only. Our results, then, revealed new mechanistic insights into BKV infection and they selected potential biomarkers that should be tested in future studies with larger patients' cohorts.

BK Polyomavirus Requires the Mismatch Repair Pathway for DNA Damage Response Activation

BK polyomavirus (PyV) infects the genitourinary tract of >90% of the adult population. Immunosuppression increases the risk of viral reactivation, making BKPyV a leading cause of graft failure in kidney transplant recipients. Polyomaviruses have a small double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome that requires host replication machinery to amplify the viral genome. Specifically, polyomaviruses promote S phase entry and delay S phase exit by activating the DNA damage response (DDR) pathway via an uncharacterized mechanism requiring viral replication. BKPyV infection elevates expression of MutSα, a mismatch repair (MMR) pathway protein complex that senses and repairs DNA mismatches and can activate the DDR. Thus, we investigated the role of the MMR pathway by silencing the MutSα component, Msh6, in BKPyV-infected primary cells. This resulted in severe DNA damage that correlated with weak DNA damage response activation and a failure to arrest the cell cycle to prevent mitotic entry during infection. Furthermore, silencing Msh6 expression resulted in significantly fewer infectious viral particles due to significantly lower levels of VP2, a minor capsid protein important for trafficking during subsequent infections. Since viral assembly occurs in the nucleus, our findings are consistent with a model in which entry into mitosis disrupts viral assembly due to nuclear envelope breakdown, which disperses VP2 throughout the cell, reducing its availability for encapsidation into viral particles. Thus, the MMR pathway may be required to activate the ATR (ATM-Rad3-related) pathway during infection to maintain a favorable environment for both viral replication and assembly. IMPORTANCE Since there are no therapeutics that target BKPyV reactivation in organ transplant patients, it is currently treated by decreasing immunosuppression to allow the natural immune system to fight the viral infection. Antivirals would significantly improve patient outcomes since reducing immunosuppression carries the risk of graft failure. PyVs activate the DDR, for which there are several promising inhibitors. However, a better understanding of how PyVs activate the DDR and what role the DDR plays during infection is needed. Here, we show that a component of the mismatch repair pathway is required for DDR activation during PyV infection. These findings show that the mismatch repair pathway is important for DDR activation during PyV infection and that inhibiting the DDR reduces viral titers by generating less infectious virions that lack the minor capsid protein VP2, which is important for viral trafficking.

Quantitative Proteomics for Monitoring Renal Transplant Injury

PURPOSE

This study is aimed at developing a molecular diagnostics platform to enhance the interpretation of renal allograft biopsies using quantitative proteomic profiling of formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A quantitative proteomics platform composed of 1) an optimized FFPE protein sample preparation method, 2) a tandem mass tag TMT10-plex-based proteomic workflow, and 3) a systematic statistical analysis pipeline to reveal differentially expressed proteins has been developed. This platform is then tested on a small sample set (five samples per phenotype) to reveal proteomic signatures that can differentiate T-cell mediated rejection (TCMR) and polyomavirus BK nephropathy (BKPyVN) from healthy functionally stable kidney tissue (STA).

RESULTS

Among 2798 quantified proteins, the expression levels of 740 BKPyVN and 638 TCMR associated proteins are significantly changed compared to STA specimens. Principal component analysis demonstrated good segregation of all three phenotypes investigated. Protein detection and quantitation are highly reproducible: replicate comparative analyses demonstrated 71-84% overlap of detected proteins, and the coefficient of variation for protein measurements is <15% in triplicate liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry runs.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Quantitative proteomics can be applied to archived FFPE specimens to differentiate different causes of renal allograft injury.

Effect of the Large and Small T-Antigens of Human Polyomaviruses on Signaling Pathways

Viruses are intracellular parasites that require a permissive host cell to express the viral genome and to produce new progeny virus particles. However, not all viral infections are productive and some viruses can induce carcinogenesis. Irrespective of the type of infection (productive or neoplastic), viruses hijack the host cell machinery to permit optimal viral replication or to transform the infected cell into a tumor cell. One mechanism viruses employ to reprogram the host cell is through interference with signaling pathways. Polyomaviruses are naked, double-stranded DNA viruses whose genome encodes the regulatory proteins large T-antigen and small t-antigen, and structural proteins that form the capsid. The large T-antigens and small t-antigens can interfere with several host signaling pathways. In this case, we review the interplay between the large T-antigens and small t-antigens with host signaling pathways and the biological consequences of these interactions.

Temporal Proteomic Analysis of BK Polyomavirus Infection Reveals Virus-Induced G2 Arrest and Highly Effective Evasion of Innate Immune Sensing

BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is a small DNA virus that establishes a life-long persistent infection in the urinary tract of most people. BKPyV is known to cause severe morbidity in renal transplant recipients and can lead to graft rejection. The simple 5.2-kbp double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome expresses just seven known proteins; thus, it relies heavily on the host machinery to replicate. How the host proteome changes over the course of infection is key to understanding this host-virus interplay. Here, for the first time quantitative temporal viromics has been used to quantify global changes in >9,000 host proteins in two types of primary human epithelial cells throughout 72 h of BKPyV infection. These data demonstrate the importance of cell cycle progression and pseudo-G₂ arrest in effective BKPyV replication, along with a surprising lack of an innate immune response throughout the whole virus replication cycle. BKPyV thus evades pathogen recognition to prevent activation of innate immune responses in a sophisticated manner.IMPORTANCE BK polyomavirus can cause serious problems in immune-suppressed patients, in particular, kidney transplant recipients who can develop polyomavirus-associated kidney disease. In this work, we have used advanced proteomics techniques to determine the changes to protein expression caused by infection of two independent primary cell types of the human urinary tract (kidney and bladder) throughout the replication cycle of this virus. Our findings have uncovered new details of a specific form of cell cycle arrest caused by this virus, and, importantly, we have identified that this virus has a remarkable ability to evade detection by host cell defense systems. In addition, our data provide an important resource for the future study of kidney epithelial cells and their infection by urinary tract pathogens.

BK Polyomavirus Activates the DNA Damage Response To Prolong S Phase

BK polyomavirus (PyV) is a major source of kidney failure in transplant recipients. The standard treatment for patients with lytic BKPyV infection is to reduce immunosuppressive therapy, which increases the risk of graft rejection. PyVs are DNA viruses that rely upon host replication proteins for viral genome replication. A hallmark of PyV infection is activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) to prevent severe host and viral DNA damage that impairs viral production by an unknown mechanism. Therefore, we sought to better understand why BKPyV activates the DDR through the ATR and ATM pathways and how this prevents DNA damage and leads to increased viral production. When ATR was inhibited in BKPyV-infected primary kidney cells, severe DNA damage occurred due to premature Cdk1 activation, which resulted in mitosis of cells that were actively replicating host DNA in S phase. Conversely, ATM was required for efficient entry into S phase and to prevent normal mitotic entry after G₂ phase. The synergistic activation of these DDR kinases promoted and maintained BKPyV-mediated S phase to enhance viral production. In contrast to BKPyV infection, DDR inhibition did not disrupt cell cycle control in uninfected cells. This suggests that DDR inhibitors may be used to specifically target BKPyV-infected cells.IMPORTANCE BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) is an emerging pathogen that reactivates in immunosuppressed organ transplant patients. We wanted to understand why BKPyV-induced activation of the DNA damage response (DDR) enhances viral titers and prevents host DNA damage. Here, we show that the virus activates the DNA damage response in order to keep the infected cells in S phase to replicate the viral DNA. The source of DNA damage was due to actively replicating cells with uncondensed chromosomes entering directly into mitosis when the DDR was inhibited in BKPyV-infected cells. This study clarifies the previously enigmatic role of the DDR during BKPyV infection by demonstrating that the virus activates the DDR to maintain the cells in S phase in order to promote viral replication and that disruption of this cell cycle arrest can lead to catastrophic DNA damage for the host.

Location is everything: protein translocations as a viral infection strategy

Protein movement between different subcellular compartments is an essential aspect of biological processes, including transcriptional and metabolic regulation, and immune and stress responses. As obligate intracellular parasites, viruses are master manipulators of cellular composition and organization. Accumulating evidences have highlighted the importance of infection-induced protein translocations between organelles. Both directional and temporal, these translocation events facilitate localization-dependent protein interactions and changes in protein functions that contribute to either host defense or virus replication. The discovery and characterization of protein movement is technically challenging, given the necessity for sensitive detection and subcellular resolution. Here, we discuss infection-induced translocations of host and viral proteins, and the value of integrating quantitative proteomics with advanced microscopy for understanding the biology of human virus infections.

In Vitro and In Vivo Models for the Study of Human Polyomavirus Infection

Developments of genome amplification techniques have rapidly expanded the family of human polyomaviruses (PyV). Following infection early in life, PyV persist in their hosts and are generally of no clinical consequence. High-level replication of PyV can occur in patients under immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy and causes severe clinical entities, such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, polyomavirus-associated nephropathy or Merkel cell carcinoma. The characterization of known and newly-discovered human PyV, their relationship to human health, and the mechanisms underlying pathogenesis remain to be elucidated. Here, we summarize the most widely-used in vitro and in vivo models to study the PyV-host interaction, pathogenesis and anti-viral drug screening. We discuss the strengths and limitations of the different models and the lessons learned.

Polyomavirus Persistence

Mammalian polyomaviruses are characterized by establishing persistent infections in healthy hosts and generally causing clinical disease only in hosts whose immune systems are compromised. Despite the fact that these viruses were discovered decades ago, our knowledge of the mechanisms that govern viral persistence and reactivation is limited. Whereas mouse polyomavirus has been studied in a fair amount of detail, our understanding of the human viruses in particular is mostly inferred from experiments aimed at addressing other questions. In this review, we summarize the state of our current knowledge, draw conclusions when possible, and suggest areas that are in need of further study.