Systematic Data Analysis and Diagnostic Machine Learning Reveal Differences between Compounds with Single- and Multitarget Activity

Explaining Accurate Predictions of Multitarget Compounds with Machine Learning Models Derived for Individual Targets

In drug discovery, compounds with well-defined activity against multiple targets (multitarget compounds, MT-CPDs) provide the basis for polypharmacology and are thus of high interest. Typically, MT-CPDs for polypharmacology have been discovered serendipitously. Therefore, over the past decade, computational approaches have also been adapted for the design of MT-CPDs or their identification via computational screening. Such approaches continue to be under development and are far from being routine. Recently, different machine learning (ML) models have been derived to distinguish between MT-CPDs and corresponding compounds with activity against the individual targets (single-target compounds, ST-CPDs). When evaluating alternative models for predicting MT-CPDs, we discovered that MT-CPDs could also be accurately predicted with models derived for corresponding ST-CPDs; this was an unexpected finding that we further investigated using explainable ML. The analysis revealed that accurate predictions of ST-CPDs were determined by subsets of structural features of MT-CPDs required for their prediction. These findings provided a chemically intuitive rationale for the successful prediction of MT-CPDs using different ML models and uncovered general-feature subset relationships between MT- and ST-CPDs with activities against different targets.

Differentiating Inhibitors of Closely Related Protein Kinases with Single- or Multi-Target Activity via Explainable Machine Learning and Feature Analysis

Protein kinases are major drug targets. Most kinase inhibitors are directed against the adenosine triphosphate (ATP) cofactor binding site, which is largely conserved across the human kinome. Hence, such kinase inhibitors are often thought to be promiscuous. However, experimental evidence and activity data for publicly available kinase inhibitors indicate that this is not generally the case. We have investigated whether inhibitors of closely related human kinases with single- or multi-kinase activity can be differentiated on the basis of chemical structure. Therefore, a test system consisting of two distinct kinase triplets has been devised for which inhibitors with reported triple-kinase activities and corresponding single-kinase activities were assembled. Machine learning models derived on the basis of chemical structure distinguished between these multi- and single-kinase inhibitors with high accuracy. A model-independent explanatory approach was applied to identify structural features determining accurate predictions. For both kinase triplets, the analysis revealed decisive features contained in multi-kinase inhibitors. These features were found to be absent in corresponding single-kinase inhibitors, thus providing a rationale for successful machine learning. Mapping of features determining accurate predictions revealed that they formed coherent and chemically meaningful substructures that were characteristic of multi-kinase inhibitors compared with single-kinase inhibitors.

Explainable machine learning predictions of dual-target compounds reveal characteristic structural features

Compounds with defined multi-target activity play an increasingly important role in drug discovery. Structural features that might be signatures of such compounds have mostly remained elusive thus far. We have explored the potential of explainable machine learning to uncover structural motifs that are characteristic of dual-target compounds. For a pharmacologically relevant target pair-based test system designed for our study, accurate prediction models were derived and the influence of molecular representation features of test compounds was quantified to explain the predictions. The analysis revealed small numbers of specific features whose presence in dual-target and absence in single-target compounds determined accurate predictions. These features formed coherent substructures in dual-target compounds. From computational analysis of specific feature contributions, structural motifs emerged that were confirmed to be signatures of different dual-target activities. Our findings demonstrate the ability of explainable machine learning to bridge between predictions and intuitive chemical analysis and reveal characteristic substructures of dual-target compounds.

Fine-tuning of a generative neural network for designing multi-target compounds

Exploring the origin of multi-target activity of small molecules and designing new multi-target compounds are highly topical issues in pharmaceutical research. We have investigated the ability of a generative neural network to create multi-target compounds. Data sets of experimentally confirmed multi-target, single-target, and consistently inactive compounds were extracted from public screening data considering positive and negative assay results. These data sets were used to fine-tune the REINVENT generative model via transfer learning to systematically recognize multi-target compounds, distinguish them from single-target or inactive compounds, and construct new multi-target compounds. During fine-tuning, the model showed a clear tendency to increasingly generate multi-target compounds and structural analogs. Our findings indicate that generative models can be adopted for de novo multi-target compound design.

Introducing the metacore concept for multi-target ligand design

In this work, we introduce the concept of "metacores" (MCs) for the organization of analog series (ASs) and multi-target (MT) ligand design. Generating compounds that are active against distantly related or unrelated targets is a central task in polypharmacology-oriented drug discovery. MCs are obtained by two-stage extraction of structural cores from ASs. The methodology is chemically intuitive and generally applicable. Each MC represents a set of related ASs and a template for the generation of new structures. We have systematically identified ASs that exclusively consisted of analogs with MT activity and determined their target profiles. From these ASs, a large set of 317 structurally diverse MCs was extracted, 127 of which were associated with different target families. The newly generated MCs were characterized and further prioritized on the basis of AS, compound, and target coverage. The analysis indicated that 260 MCs were pharmaceutically relevant. These MCs and the compound and target information they capture are made freely available for medicinal chemistry applications.

Machine learning reveals that structural features distinguishing promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds depend on target combinations

Compounds with defined multi-target activity (promiscuity) play an increasingly important role in drug discovery. However, the molecular basis of multi-target activity is currently only little understood. In particular, it remains unclear whether structural features exist that generally characterize promiscuous compounds and set them apart from compounds with single-target activity. We have devised a test system using machine learning to systematically examine structural features that might characterize compounds with multi-target activity. Using this system, more than 860,000 diagnostic predictions were carried out. The analysis provided compelling evidence for the presence of structural characteristics of promiscuous compounds that were dependent on given target combinations, but not generalizable. Feature weighting and mapping identified characteristic substructures in test compounds. Taken together, these findings are relevant for the design of compounds with desired multi-target activity.

Structured data sets of compounds with multi-target and corresponding single-target activity from biological assays

Aim:

Providing compound data sets for promiscuity analysis with single-target (ST) and multi-target (MT) activity, taking confirmed inactivity against targets into account.

Methodology:

Compounds and target annotations are extracted from screening assays. For a given combination of targets, MT and ST compounds are identified, ensuring test data completeness.

Exemplary results & data:

A total of 1242 MT compounds active against five or more targets and 6629 corresponding ST compounds are characterized, organized and made freely available.

Limitations & next steps:

Screening campaigns typically cover a smaller target space than compounds from the medicinal chemistry literature and their activity annotations might be of lesser quality. Reported compound groups will be subjected to target set-based promiscuity analysis and predictions.

The ability of a compound to bind to multiple biological targets by defined mechanisms is termed promiscuity. Analyzing compound promiscuity helps to better understand how drugs function that are capable of interacting with multiple therapeutic targets. In drug discovery, this phenomenon is referred to as polypharmacology. Machine learning using data sets of compounds with multi-target and corresponding single-target activity aids in identifying structural features that distinguish these compounds.

Analysis of Biological Screening Compounds with Single- or Multi-Target Activity via Diagnostic Machine Learning

Predicting compounds with single- and multi-target activity and exploring origins of compound specificity and promiscuity is of high interest for chemical biology and drug discovery. We present a large-scale analysis of compound promiscuity including two major components. First, high-confidence datasets of compounds with multi- and corresponding single-target activity were extracted from biological screening data. Positive and negative assay results were taken into account and data completeness was ensured. Second, these datasets were investigated using diagnostic machine learning to systematically distinguish between compounds with multi- and single-target activity. Models built on the basis of chemical structure consistently produced meaningful predictions. These findings provided evidence for the presence of structural features differentiating promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds. Machine learning under varying conditions using modified datasets revealed a strong influence of nearest neighbor relationship on the predictions. Many multi-target compounds were found to be more similar to other multi-target compounds than single-target compounds and vice versa, which resulted in consistently accurate predictions. The results of our study confirm the presence of structural relationships that differentiate promiscuous and non-promiscuous compounds.