1
|
Lacombe J, Summers AJ, Khanishayan A, Khorsandian Y, Hacey I, Blackson W, Zenhausern F. Paper-Based Vertical Flow Immunoassay for the Point-of-Care Multiplex Detection of Radiation Dosimetry Genes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2023; 163:178-186. [PMID: 37369178 PMCID: PMC10751381 DOI: 10.1159/000531702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In a nuclear or radiological incident, first responders must quickly and accurately measure radiation exposure among civilians as medical countermeasures are radiation dose-dependent and time-sensitive. Although several approaches have been explored to measure absorbed radiation dose, there is an important need to develop point-of-care (POC) bioassay devices that can be used immediately to triage thousands of individuals potentially exposed to radiation. Here we present a proof-of-concept study showing the use of a paper-based vertical flow immunoassay (VFI) to detect radiation dosimetry genes. Using labeled primers during amplification and a multiplex membrane, our results showed that the nucleic acid VFI can simultaneously detect two biodosimetry genes, CDKN1A and DDB2, as well as one housekeeping gene MRPS5. The assay demonstrated good linearity and precision with an inter- and intra-assay coefficient of variance <20% and <10%, respectively. Moreover, the assay showed its ability to discriminate non-irradiated controls (0 Gy) from irradiated samples (1 + 2 Gy) with an overall sensitivity of 62.5% and specificity of 100% (AUC = 0.8672, 95% CI: 0.723-1.000; p = 0.004). Interestingly, the gene combination also showed a dose-dependent response for 0, 1, and 2 Gy, similar to data obtained by real-time PCR benchmark. These preliminary results suggest that a VFI platform can be used to detect simultaneously multiple genes that can be then quantified, thus offering a new approach for a POC biodosimetry assay that could be rapidly deployed on-site to test a large population and help triage and medical management after radiological event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Lacombe
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Alexander J. Summers
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Ashkan Khanishayan
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Yasaman Khorsandian
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Isabella Hacey
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Wyatt Blackson
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Frederic Zenhausern
- Center for Applied NanoBioscience and Medicine, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Medicine Phoenix, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Comparison of blocking reagents for antibody microarray-based immunoassays on glass and paper membrane substrates. Anal Bioanal Chem 2023; 415:1967-1977. [PMID: 36829042 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-023-04614-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Background noise due to nonspecific binding of biomolecules on the assay substrates is one of the most common challenges that limits the sensitivity of microarray-based immunoassays. Background signal intensity usually increases when complex biological fluids are used because they have a combination of molecules and vesicles that can adsorb onto substrate surfaces. Blocking strategies coupled with surface chemistries can reduce such nonspecific binding and improve assay sensitivity. In this paper, we conducted a systematic optimization of blocking strategies on a variety of commonly used substrates for protein measurement in complex biofluids. Four blocking strategies (BSA, non-fat milk, PEG, and a protein-free solution) coupled with four surface chemistries (3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane (GPS), poly-L-lysine (PLL), aminoalkylsilane (AAS), and nitrocellulose (NC)) were studied for their effect on background, microspot, and net signal intensities. We have also explored the effect that these blocking strategies have when proteins in complex samples (plasma, serum, cell culture media, and EV lysate) are measured. Irregular spot morphology could affect signal extraction using automated software. We found that the microspots with the best morphology were the ones printed on GPS glass surfaces for all immunoassays. On NC membrane, the protein-based blocking strategies yielded the highest net fluorescent intensity with the antigen contained in PBS, plasma, serum, and serum-free cell culture media. Differently, with EV lysate samples, Pierce™ protein-free blocker yielded the best net signal intensity on both GPS and NC surfaces. The choice of blocking strategies highly depends on the substrate. Moreover, the findings discovered in this study are not limited to microarray-based immunoassays but can provide insights for other assay formats.
Collapse
|