Protein-DNA interactions and alterations in the DNA structure upon UvrB-DNA preincision complex formation during nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli

Real-time single-molecule imaging reveals a direct interaction between UvrC and UvrB on DNA tightropes

Nucleotide excision DNA repair is mechanistically conserved across all kingdoms of life. In prokaryotes, this multi-enzyme process requires six proteins: UvrA–D, DNA polymerase I and DNA ligase. To examine how UvrC locates the UvrB–DNA pre-incision complex at a site of damage, we have labeled UvrB and UvrC with different colored quantum dots and quantitatively observed their interactions with DNA tightropes under a variety of solution conditions using oblique angle fluorescence imaging. Alone, UvrC predominantly interacts statically with DNA at low salt. Surprisingly, however, UvrC and UvrB together in solution bind to form the previously unseen UvrBC complex on duplex DNA. This UvrBC complex is highly motile and engages in unbiased one-dimensional diffusion. To test whether UvrB makes direct contact with the DNA in the UvrBC–DNA complex, we investigated three UvrB mutants: Y96A, a β-hairpin deletion and D338N. These mutants affected the motile properties of the UvrBC complex, indicating that UvrB is in intimate contact with the DNA when bound to UvrC. Given the in vivo excess of UvrB and the abundance of UvrBC in our experiments, this newly identified complex is likely to be the predominant form of UvrC in the cell.

Structural basis for DNA recognition and processing by UvrB

DNA-damage recognition in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) cascade is a complex process, operating on a wide variety of damages. UvrB is the central component in prokaryotic NER, directly involved in DNA-damage recognition and guiding the DNA through repair synthesis. We report the first structure of a UvrB-double-stranded DNA complex, providing insights into the mechanism by which UvrB binds DNA, leading to formation of the preincision complex. One DNA strand, containing a 3' overhang, threads behind a beta-hairpin motif of UvrB, indicating that this motif inserts between the strands of the double helix, thereby locking down either the damaged or undamaged strand. The nucleotide directly behind the beta-hairpin is flipped out and inserted into a small, highly conserved pocket in UvrB.

'Close-fitting sleeves': DNA damage recognition by the UvrABC nuclease system

DNA damage recognition represents a long-standing problem in the field of protein-DNA interactions. This article reviews our current knowledge of how damage recognition is achieved in bacterial nucleotide excision repair through the concerted action of the UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC proteins.

Analyzing the handoff of DNA from UvrA to UvrB utilizing DNA-protein photoaffinity labeling

To better define the molecular architecture of nucleotide excision repair intermediates it is necessary to identify the specific domains of UvrA, UvrB, and UvrC that are in close proximity to DNA damage during the repair process. One key step of nucleotide excision repair that is poorly understood is the transfer of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB, prior to incision by UvrC. To study this transfer, we have utilized two types of arylazido-modified photoaffinity reagents that probe residues in the Uvr proteins that are closest to either the damaged or non-damaged strands. The damaged strand probes consisted of dNTP analogs linked to a terminal arylazido moiety. These analogs were incorporated into double-stranded DNA using DNA polymerase beta and functioned as both the damage site and the cross-linking reagent. The non-damaged strand probe contained an arylazido moiety coupled to a phosphorothioate-modified backbone of an oligonucleotide opposite the damaged strand, which contained an internal fluorescein adduct. Six site-directed mutants of Bacillus caldotenax UvrB located in different domains within the protein (Y96A, E99A, R123A, R183E, F249A, and D510A), and two domain deletions (Delta2 and Deltabeta-hairpin), were assayed. Data gleaned from these mutants suggest that the handoff of damaged DNA from UvrA to UvrB proceeds in a three-step process: 1) UvrA and UvrB bind to the damaged site, with UvrA in direct contact; 2) a transfer reaction with UvrB contacting mostly the non-damaged DNA strand; 3) lesion engagement by the damage recognition pocket of UvrB with concomitant release of UvrA.

Solution structure and DNA-binding properties of the C-terminal domain of UvrC from E.coli

The C-terminal domain of the UvrC protein (UvrC CTD) is essential for 5' incision in the prokaryotic nucleotide excision repair process. We have determined the three-dimensional structure of the UvrC CTD using heteronuclear NMR techniques. The structure shows two helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motifs connected by a small connector helix. The UvrC CTD is shown to mediate structure-specific DNA binding. The domain binds to a single-stranded-double-stranded junction DNA, with a strong specificity towards looped duplex DNA that contains at least six unpaired bases per loop ("bubble DNA"). Using chemical shift perturbation experiments, the DNA-binding surface is mapped to the first hairpin region encompassing the conserved glycine-valine-glycine residues followed by lysine-arginine-arginine, a positively charged surface patch and the second hairpin region consisting of glycine-isoleucine-serine. A model for the protein-DNA complex is proposed that accounts for this specificity.

The C-terminal region of Escherichia coli UvrC contributes to the flexibility of the UvrABC nucleotide excision repair system

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli involves formation of the UvrB-DNA complex and subsequent DNA incisions on either site of the damage by UvrC. In this paper, we studied the incision of substrates with different damages in varying sequence contexts. We show that there is not always a correlation between the incision efficiency and the stability of the UvrB-DNA complex. Both stable and unstable UvrB-DNA complexes can be efficiently incised. However some lesions that give rise to stable UvrB-DNA complexes do result in a very low incision. We present evidence that this poor incision is due to sterical hindrance of the damage itself. In its C-terminal region UvrC contains two helix-hairpin-helix (HhH) motifs. Mutational analysis shows that these motifs constitute one functional unit, probably folded as one structural unit; the (HhH)2 domain. This (HhH)2 domain was previously shown to be important for the 5' incision on a substrate containing a (cis-Pt).GG adduct, but not for 3' incision. Here we show that, mainly depending on the sequence context of the lesion, the (HhH)2 domain can be important for 3' and/or 5' incision. We propose that the (HhH)2 domain stabilises specific DNA structures required for the two incisions, thereby contributing to the flexibility of the UvrABC repair system.

The inefficiency of incisions of ecteinascidin 743-DNA adducts by the UvrABC nuclease and the unique structural feature of the DNA adducts can be used to explain the repair-dependent toxicities of this antitumor agent

BACKGROUND

Ecteinascidin 743 (Et 743), a natural product derived from a marine tunicate, is a potent antitumor agent presently in phase II clinical trials. Et 743 binds in the minor groove of DNA and alkylates N2 of guanine via a unique mechanism involving catalytic activation. The sequence selectivity of Et 743 is governed by different patterns of hydrogen-bonding to DNA, which results in differential reversibility of the covalent adducts. As determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, the preferred sequences 5'-PuGC and 5'-PyGG are stabilized by a hydrogen-bonding network, while the non-preferred sequences 5'-NG(A/T) are much less stabilized due to the lack of a key hydrogen bond to the GC base pair on the 3'-side of the alkylated guanine.

RESULTS

Mammalian cell lines (XPB, XPD, XPF, XPG, and ERCC1) deficient in the nucleotide excision repair (NER) gene products show resistance to Et 743. The recognition and subsequent incision of Et 743-DNA adducts by the bacterial multisubunit endonuclease UvrABC were used to evaluate DNA repair-mediated toxicity as a rationale for the resistance of NER-defective cell lines and the antitumor activity of Et 743. The Et 743-DNA adducts are indeed recognized and incised by the UvrABC repair proteins; however, the pattern of incision indicated that the non-preferred, and less stable, sequences (i.e. 5'-NG(A/T)) modified with Et 743 are generally incised at a much higher efficiency than the preferred, more stable sequences (i.e. 5'-PuGC or 5'-PyGG). In addition, within the same Et 743 recognition sequence, the level of incision varies, indicating that flanking regions also contribute to the differential incision frequency.

CONCLUSIONS

The inefficient repair incision by the UvrABC nuclease of Et 743-DNA adducts provides a basis for rationalizing the observed repair-dependent cytotoxicities of these DNA adducts, if other associated structural properties of Et 743-DNA adducts are taken into account. In particular, the wedge-shaped Et 743, which forces open the minor groove of DNA, introducing a major groove bend, and the extrahelical protrusion of the C-subunit of Et 743 provide unique characteristics alongside the hydrogen-bonding stabilization of a covalent DNA adduct, which we propose traps an intermediate in NER processing of Et 743-DNA adducts. This trapped intermediate protein-Et 743-DNA adduct complex can be considered analogous to a poisoned topoisomerase I- or topoisomerase II-DNA complex. In the absence of an intact NER nuclease complex, this toxic lesion is unable to form, and the Et 743-DNA adducts, although not repaired by the NER pathway, are less toxic to cells. Conversely, elevated levels of either of these nucleases should lead to enhanced Et 743 toxicity.

Damage recognition in nucleotide excision repair of DNA

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is found throughout nature, in eubacteria, eukaryotes and archaea. In human cells it is the main pathway for the removal of damage caused by UV light, but it also acts on a wide variety of other bulky helix-distorting lesions caused by chemical mutagens. An ongoing challenge is to understand how a site of DNA damage is located during NER and distinguished from non-damaged sites. This article reviews information on damage recognition in mammalian cells and the bacterium Escherichia coli. In mammalian cells the XPC-hHR23B, XPA, RPA and TFIIH factors may all have a role in damage recognition. XPC-hHR23B has the strongest affinity for damaged DNA in some assays, as does the similar budding yeast complex Rad4-Rad23. There is current discussion as to whether XPC or XPA acts first in the repair process to recognise damage or distortions. TFIIH may play a role in distinguishing the damaged strand from the non-damaged one, if translocation along a DNA strand by the TFIIH DNA helicases is interrupted by encountering a lesion. The recognition and incision steps of human NER use 15 to 18 polypeptides, whereas E. coli requires only three proteins to obtain a similar result. Despite this, many remarkable similarities in the NER mechanism have emerged between eukaryotes and bacteria. These include use of a distortion-recognition factor, a strand separating helicase to create an open preincision complex, participation of structure-specific endonucleases and the lack of a need for certain factors when a region containing damage is already sufficiently distorted.

Crystal structure of the DNA nucleotide excision repair enzyme UvrB from Thermus thermophilus

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most important DNA-repair mechanism in living organisms. In prokaryotes, three enzymes forming the UvrABC system initiate NER of a variety of structurally different DNA lesions. UvrB, the central component of this system, is responsible for the ultimate DNA damage recognition and participates in the incision of the damaged DNA strand. The crystal structure of Thermus thermophilus UvrB reveals a core that is structurally similar to core regions found in helicases, where they constitute molecular motors. Additional domains implicated in binding to DNA and various components of the NER system are attached to this central core. The architecture and distribution of DNA binding sites suggest a possible model for the DNA damage recognition process.

Chemical display of thymine residues flipped out by DNA methyltransferases

The DNA cytosine-C5 methyltransferase M. Hha I flips its target base out of the DNA helix during interaction with the substrate sequence GCGC. Binary and ternary complexes between M. Hha I and hemimethylated DNA duplexes were used to examine the suitability of four chemical methods to detect flipped-out bases in protein-DNA complexes. These methods probe the structural peculiarities of pyrimidine bases in DNA. We find that in cases when the target cytosine is replaced with thymine (GTGC), KMnO4proved an efficient probe for positive display of flipped-out thymines. The generality of this procedure was further verified by examining a DNA adenine-N6 methyltransferase, M. Taq I, in which case an enhanced reactivity of thymine replacing the target adenine (TCGT) in the recognition sequence TCGA was also observed. Our results support the proposed base-flipping mechanism for adenine methyltransferases, and offer a convenient laboratory tool for detection of flipped-out thymines in protein-DNA complexes.

Introduction of a tryptophan reporter group into the ATP binding motif of the Escherichia coli UvrB protein for the study of nucleotide binding and conformational dynamics

The DNA-dependent ATPase activity of UvrB is required to support preincision steps in nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli. This activity is, however, cryptic. Elicited in nucleotide excision repair by association with the UvrA protein, it may also be unmasked by a specific proteolysis eliminating the C-terminal domain of UvrB (generating UvrB*). We introduced fluorescent reporter groups (tryptophan replacing Phe47 or Asn51) into the ATP binding motif of UvrB, without significant alteration of behavior, to study both nucleotide binding and those conformational changes expected to be essential to function. The inserted tryptophans occupy moderately hydrophobic, although potentially heterogeneous, environments as evidenced by fluorescence emission and time-resolved decay characteristics, yet are accessible to the diffusible quencher acrylamide. Activation, via specific proteolysis, is accompanied by conformational change at the ATP binding site, with multiple changes in emission spectra and a greater shielding of the tryptophans from diffusible quencher. Titration of tryptophan fluorescence with ATP has revealed that, although catalytically incompetent, UvrB can bind ATP and bind with an affinity equal to that of the active UvrB* form (Kd of approximately 1 mM). The ATP binding site of UvrB is therefore functional and accessible, suggesting that conformational change either brings amino acid residues into proper alignment for catalysis and/or enables response to effector DNA.

The C-terminal region of the Escherichia coli UvrC protein, which is homologous to the C-terminal region of the human ERCC1 protein, is involved in DNA binding and 5'-incision

The incisions in the DNA at the 3'- and 5'-side of a DNA damage during nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli occur in a complex consisting of damaged DNA, UvrB and UvrC. The exact requirements for the two incision events, however, are different. It has previously been shown that the 3'-incision requires the interaction between the C-terminal domain of UvrB and a homologous region in UvrC. This interaction, however, is dispensable for the 5'-incision. Here we show that the C-terminal domain of the UvrC protein is essential for the 5'-incision, whereas this domain can be deleted without affecting the 3'-incision. The C-terminal domain of UvrC is homologous with the C-terminal part of the ERCC1 protein which, in a complex with XPF, is responsible for the 5'-incision reaction in human nucleotide excision repair. Both in the UvrC and the ERCC1 domain a Helix-hairpin-Helix (HhH) motif can be indicated, albeit at different positions. Such a motif also has been found in a large variety of DNA binding proteins and it has been suggested to form a structure involved in non-sequence-specific DNA binding. In contrast to the full length UvrC protein, a truncated UvrC protein (UvrC554) lacking the entire ERCC1 homology including the HhH motif no longer binds to ssDNA. Analysis of protein-DNA complexes using bandshift experiments showed that this putative DNA binding domain of UvrC is required for stabilisation of the UvrBC-DNA complex after the 3'-incision has taken place. We propose that after the initial 3'-incision the HhH motif recognises a specific DNA structure, thereby positioning the catalytic site for the subsequent 5'-incision reaction.

A specific 3' exonuclease activity of UvrABC

Specific cutting of undamaged DNA by UvrABC nuclease is observed. It occurs seven nucleotides (nt) from the 3' terminus of oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded M13 DNA circles. Although the location of the UvrABC cut on undamaged DNA is similar to that of the cut on the 5' side of a damaged DNA site during the dual incision reaction, the cut of undamaged DNA is not an intermediate in the dual incision step. On DNA duplexes with a single AAF adduct, the anticipated cut at the eighth phosphodiester bond 5' of the lesion is present, but extra cuts at 7-nt increments are observed at the 15th and 22nd phosphodiester bonds. We suggest that these additional cuts are made by the UvrABC activity observed on undamaged DNA; such activity is referred to as ABC 3' exonuclease and may play a significant role by providing a suitable gap for RecA-mediated recombinational exchanges during repair of interstrand crosslinks and closely opposed lesions. This ABC 3' exonuclease activity depends on higher concentrations of Uvr proteins as compared with dual incision and may be relevant to reactions that occur when UvrA and UvrB are increased during SOS induction.

UvrAB activity at a damaged DNA site: is unpaired DNA present?

To study the activity of the Escherichia coli UvrA and UvrB nucleotide excision repair proteins during the formation of the pre-incision complex at a damaged DNA site, we used substrates with modifications around a single 2-(acetylamino)fluorene (AAF) lesion. Based on the release of AAF-containing oligonucleotides from a single-stranded DNA circle, we conclude that during interaction with our substrates UvrAB introduces changes in DNA which are localized at the lesion and are limited to 1-3 bp. Since these changes might include a denaturation of DNA at the lesion site and, consequently, a bubble structure might be present in a pre-incision complex, we studied incision activity of UvrABC excinuclease on substrates with 1-4 unpaired bases next to an AAF adduct. Opening more than one base on either or both sides of the lesion caused a significant decrease in the incision activity of UvrABC, but did not change the position of the incision sites. We conclude that the UvrAB action leading to a pre-incision complex does not include the formation of a bubble intermediate generated by extensive denaturation of base pairs.

The limited strand-separating activity of the UvrAB protein complex and its role in the recognition of DNA damage

The recognition by Escherichia coli Uvr nucleotide excision repair proteins of a variety of lesions with diverse chemical structures and the presence of helicase activity in the UvrAB complex which can displace short oligonucleotides annealed to single-stranded DNA led to a model in which this activity moves UvrAB along undamaged DNA to damaged sites where the lesion blocks further translocation and the protein-DNA pre-incision complex is formed. To evaluate this mechanism for damage recognition, we constructed substrates with oligonucleotides of different lengths annealed to single-stranded DNA circles and placed a single 2-(acetylamino)fluorene (AAF) lesion either on the oligonucleotide or on the circle. For the substrates with no lesion, the UvrAB complex effectively displaced a 22-mer but not a 27-mer or longer fragments. The presence of AAF on the oligonucleotide significantly increased the release of the 27-mer but oligomers of 30 or longer were not separated. Placing the lesion on the circular strand did not block the release of the fragments. Instead, the releasing activity of UvrAB was stimulated and also depended on the length of the annealed oligonucleotide. These observations do not agree with the predictions of a damage recognition mechanism that depends on helicase-driven translocation. Most likely, the strand-separating activity of UvrAB is a consequence of local changes occurring during the formation of a DNA-protein pre-incision complex at the damaged site and is not due to translocation of the protein along undamaged DNA to locate a lesion.

Open complex formation around a lesion during nucleotide excision repair provides a structure for cleavage by human XPG protein

Human XPG nuclease makes the 3' incision during nucleotide excision repair of DNA. The enzyme cleaves model DNA bubble structures specifically near the junction of unpaired DNA with a duplex region. It is not yet known, however, whether an unpaired structure is an intermediate during actual DNA repair. We find here that XPG requires opening of >5 bp for efficient cleavage. To seek direct evidence for formation of an open structure around a lesion in DNA during a nucleotide excision repair reaction in vitro, KMnO4 footprinting experiments were performed on a damaged DNA molecule bearing a uniquely placed cisplatin adduct. An unwound open complex spanning approximately 25 nucleotides was observed that extended to the positions of 5' and 3' incision sites and was dependent on XPA protein and on ATP. Opening during repair occurred prior to strand incision by XPG.

RNA polymerase signals UvrAB landing sites

Transcription when coupled to nucleotide excision repair specifies the location in active genes where preferential DNA repair is to take place. During DNA damage-induced recruitment of RNA polymerase (RNAP), there is a physical association of the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNAP and the UvrA component of the repair apparatus (G. C. Lin and L. Grossman, submitted for publication). This molecular affinity is reflected in the ability of the RNAP to increase, in a promoter-dependent manner, DNA supercoiling by the UvrAB complex. In the presence of the RNAP, the UvrAB complex is able to bind to promoter regions and to translocate in a 5' to 3' direction along the non-transcribed strand. As a consequence of this helicase-catalyzed translocation, preferential incision of DNA damaged sites occurs downstream on the transcribed strand. Because of the helicase directionality, the initial binding of the UvrAB complex to the transcribed strand would inevitably lead to its collision with the RNAP. These results imply that the RNAP-induced DNA structure in the vicinity of the transcription start site signals a landing or entry site for the UvrAB complex on DNA.

The C-terminal region of the UvrB protein of Escherichia coli contains an important determinant for UvrC binding to the preincision complex but not the catalytic site for 3'-incision

The UvrABC endonuclease from Escherichia coli repairs damage in the DNA by dual incision of the damaged strand on both sides of the lesion. The incisions are in an ordered fashion, first on the 3'-side and next on the 5'-side of the damage, and they are the result of binding of UvrC to the UvrB-DNA preincision complex. In this paper, we show that at least the C-terminal 24 amino acids of UvrB are involved in interaction with UvrC and that this binding is important for the 3'-incision. The C-terminal region of UvrB, which shows homology with a domain of the UvrC protein, is part of a region that is predicted to be able to form a coiled-coil. We therefore propose that UvrB and UvrC interact through the formation of such a structure. The C-terminal region of UvrB only interacts with UvrC when present in the preincision complex, indicating that the conformational change in UvrB accompanying the formation of this complex exposes the UvrC binding domain. Binding of UvrC to the C-terminal region of UvrB is not important for the 5'-incision, suggesting that for this incision a different interaction of UvrC with the UvrB-DNA complex is required. Truncated UvrB mutants that lack up to 99 amino acids from the C terminus still give rise to significant incision (1-2%), indicating that this C-terminal region of UvrB does not participate in the formation of the active site for 3'-incision. This region, however, contains the residue (Glu-640) that was proposed to be involved in 3'-catalysis, since a mutation of the residue (E640A) fails to promote 3'-incision (Lin, J.J., Phillips, A.M., Hearst, J.E., and Sancar, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17693-17700). We have isolated a mutant UvrB with the same E640A substitution, but this protein shows normal UvrC binding and incision in vitro and also results in normal survival after UV irradiation in vivo. As a consequence of these results, it is still an open question as to whether the catalytic site for 3'-incision is located in UvrB, in UvrC, or is formed by both proteins.

Cisplatin and DNA repair in cancer chemotherapy

Cisplatin, a DNA-damaging agent, is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs. As with all members of this class of chemotherapeutic compounds, the clinical success of cisplatin is compromised if tumor cells become resistant by various mechanisms, including enhanced DNA repair. In addition to its role in resistance, DNA repair has been linked to the cytotoxic mechanism of cisplatin. DNA damaged by the drug has proved to be a valuable tool for exploring the details of the nucleotide excision repair pathway.

Structure and function of the UvrB protein

UvrB plays a central role in (A)BC excinuclease. To identify the regions of UvrB which are involved in interacting with UvrA, UvrC, and DNA, deletion mutants, point mutants, and various fusion forms of UvrB were constructed and characterized. We found that the region encompassing amino acid residues 115-250 of UvrB binds to UvrA, while the region encompassing amino acid residues 547-673 binds to both UvrA and UvrC. In addition, the region between these two domains, which contains the helicase motifs II-VI, was found to be involved in binding to DNA. Within this DNA-binding region, two point mutants, E265A and E338A, were found to be unable to bind DNA while two residues, Phe-365 and Phe-496, were identified to interact with DNA. Furthermore, fluorescence quenching studies with mutants F365W and F496W and repair of thymine cyclobutane dimers by photoinduced electron transfer by these mutants suggest that residues Phe-365 and Phe-496 interact with DNA most likely through stacking interactions.