Extensively methylated myosin subfragment-1: examination of local structure, interactions with nucleotides and actin, and ligand-induced conformational changes

The myosin motor: muscle contraction and in vitro movement

The molecular mechanism of in vitro movement is assumed, by most investigators, to be identical to that of muscle contraction. We discuss this view, which raises various problems. We believe there are mechanisms for muscle contraction (in this case considerable forces are developed, with small displacements) and other mechanisms for in vitro movement (giving large displacements, without necessarily generating substantial forces). Hybrid models may explain muscle contraction. The traditional swinging-crossbridge model may explain in vitro movement. For muscle contraction, movement may result partly from the swinging-crossbridge mechanism and partly from other factors. Comparisons of different fibres at different moments of the Mg-ATPase cycle suggest that both the value of the isometric force in muscle and in vitro and that of the Mg-ATPase activity used in vitro need to be reconsidered. The recently reported dependence of the isometric active tension of smooth skinned fibres on temperature appears to be weaker than predicted by the swinging-crossbridge theory alone. This recent observation is compatible with the existence of other forces (electrostatic repulsions) decreasing with temperature as has been known for some years. From recent experimental data, we think the biochemistry of myosin and actomyosin should be reassessed, to try to find new details of the mechanisms of muscle contraction and in vitro motility.

Critical review of the swinging crossbridge theory and of the cardinal active role of water in muscle contraction

A critical analysis is presented of the experimental findings that led to the sliding filament model and to its offspring--the swinging (by rotating or tilting) crossbridge theory of muscle contraction (SCBT). Several principles that have been taken for granted implicitly and explicitly by the creators of these dogmas are discussed. The failure of numerous efforts to verify predictions of the SCBT, particularly the idea that the myosin molecules undergo a major conformational change, is critically reviewed. Analysis of various experimental data suggests that water may play an active role in muscular contraction. Examination of both the experiments that do not fulfill the expectations of the SCBT and the measurements of water liberation during the "contractile" process suggests a new outlook according to which tension development and movement are not due to major conformational changes but rather to restructuring of the hydration shells of actin and myosin.

Differential scanning calorimetric study of the complexes of modified myosin subfragment 1 with ADP and vanadate or beryllium fluoride

The effects of various modifications of rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 on the thermal denaturation of subfragment 1 in ternary complexes with Mg-ADP and orthovanadate (V1) or beryllium fluoride (BeFx) have been studied by differential scanning calorimetry. It has been shown that specific modifications of SH1 group of Cys-707 by different sulfhydryl reagents, trinitrophenylation of Lys-83, and reductive methylation of lysine residues promote the decomposition of the S1.ADP.Vi complex and change the character of structural transitions of the subfragment 1 molecule induced by the formation of this complex, but they have much less or no influence on subfragment 1 thermal stability in the S1.ADP.BeFx complex. Thus, the differential scanning calorimetric studies on modified subfragment 1 preparations reveal a significant difference between S1.ADP.Vi and S1.ADP.BeFx complexes. It is suggested that S1.ADP.Vi and S1.ADP.BeFx complexes represent structural analogues of different transition states of the ATPase cycle, namely the intermediate states S1**.ADP.Pi and S1*.ATP, respectively. It is also proposed that during formation of the S1.ADP.Vi complex the region containing both Cys-707 and Lys-83 plays an important role in the spread of conformational changes from the active site of subfragment 1 ATPase throughout the structure of the entire subfragment 1 molecule. In such a case, the effects of reductive methylation of lysine residues on the subfragment 1 structure in the S1.ADP.Vi complex are related to the modification of Lys-83.

The conformation of xanthene dyes in the myosin sulfhydryl one binding site. Part I. Methods and model systems

Derivatives of the fluorescent probes fluorescein and rhodamine specifically and covalently modify the highly reactive thiol (SH1) of myosin subfragment 1 (S1). Both probes develop circular dichroism (CD) upon modification of SH1 at the visible absorption band of the chromophore. A model system of chiral complexing agents (aromatic chiral amines) interacting with fluorescein in solvent develops a CD signal that mimics that produced by S1. The model system suggests that a specific interaction of the probe with an aromatic chiral residue in the SH1 binding pocket induces the CD signal. Several other spectroscopic signals, including absorption and fluorescence intensity and anisotropy, characterize the fluorescein or rhodamine binding to SH1. A coupled dipole method is adapted to interpret these spectroscopic signals in terms of the probe-S1 complex conformation. The computation of the orientation of the principal hydrodynamic frame (PHF) of S1 from its crystallographic alpha-carbon backbone structure permits the known orientation of the probe in the PHF of S1 to further constrain the conformation of the probe-S1 complex. The coupled dipole interpretation of spectroscopic data combined with constraints relating the probe dipole orientation to the PHF of S1 determines the conformation of the probe-S1 complex. The methods developed here are applied to the spectroscopic signals from fluorescein or rhodamine in the SH1 binding site of S1 to obtain an atomic resolution model of the probe-S1 conformation [Ajtai and Burghardt, Biochemistry, 34 (1995) 15943-15952].

The radius of gyration of native and reductively methylated myosin subfragment-1 from neutron scattering

Reductive methylation of nearly all lysine groups of myosin subfragment-1 (S1) was required for crystallization and solution of its structure at atomic resolution. Possible effects of such methylation on the radius of gyration of chicken skeletal muscle myosin S1 have been investigated by using small-angle neutron scattering. In addition, we have investigated the effect of MgADP.Vi, which is thought to produce an analog of the S1.ADP.Pi state, on the S1 radius of gyration. We find that although methylation of S1, with or without SO42- ion addition, does not significantly alter the structure, addition of ADP plus vanadate does decrease the radius of gyration significantly. The S1 crystal structure predicts a radius of gyration close to that measured here by neutron scattering. These results suggest that the overall shape by crystallography resembles nucleotide-free S1 in solution. In order to estimate the effect of residues missing from the crystal structure, the structure of missing loops was estimated by secondary-structure prediction methods. Calculations using the complete crystal structure show that a simple closure of the nucleotide cleft by a rigid-body torsional rotation of residues (172-180 to 670) around an axis running along the base of the cleft alone does not produce changes as large as seen here and in x-ray scattering results. On the other hand, a rigid body rotation of either the light-chain binding domain (767 to 843 plus light chains) or of a portion of 20-kDa peptide plus this domain (706 to 843 plus light chains) is more readily capable of producing such changes.

The role of water in the mechanism of muscular contraction

Twenty-five years after its proposal, the swinging theory of muscular contraction, in which the majority of scientists in the field have blindly believed, has not yet been verified. Rapidly growing experimental evidence indicates that the myosin heads do not swing. It is time to look for an alternative mechanism. Data is presented indicating that water is liberated during tension development and the extent to which it is released appears to affect the degree of tension. Since water can move (because of acquired extra energy, involvement in hydration forces etc.), it might cause protein movement.