Circular dichroism and thermal denaturation studies of subnucleosomes and their relationships to nucleosome structure

The central role of chromatin in autoimmune responses to histones and DNA in systemic lupus erythematosus

To gain insight into the mechanisms of autoantibody induction, sera from 40 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were tested by ELISAs for antibody binding to denatured individual histones, native histone-histone complexes, histone-DNA subnucleosome complexes, three forms of chromatin, and DNA. Whole chromatin was the most reactive substrate, with 88% of the patients positive. By chi-square analysis, only the presence of anti-(H2A-H2B), anti-[(H2A-H2B)-DNA], and antichromatin were correlated with kidney disease measured by proteinuria > 0.5 g/d. SLE patients could be divided into two groups based on their antibody-binding pattern to the above substrates. Antibodies from about half of the patients reacted with chromatin and the (H2A-H2B)-DNA subnucleosome complex but displayed very low or no reactivity with native DNA or the (H3-H4)2-DNA subnucleosome complex. An additional third of the patients had antibody reactivity to chromatin, as well as to both subnucleosome structures and DNA. Strikingly, all sera that bound to any of the components of chromatin also bound to whole chromatin, and adsorption with chromatin removed 85-100% of reactivity to (H2A-H2B)-DNA, (H3-H4)2-DNA, and native DNA. Individual sera often bound to several different epitopes on chromatin, with some epitopes requiring quaternary protein-DNA interactions. These results are consistent with chromatin being a potent immunogenic stimulus in SLE. Taken together with previous studies, we suggest that antibody activity to the (H2A-H2B)-DNA component signals the initial breakdown of immune tolerance whereas responses to (H3-H4)2-DNA and native DNA reflect subsequent global loss of tolerance to chromatin.

Genesis and evolution of antichromatin autoantibodies in murine lupus implicates T-dependent immunization with self antigen

Autoantibodies reacting with chromatin and its components, histones and DNA, are characteristic of the human autoimmune disease SLE and drug-induced lupus, but the mechanisms of their induction remain unknown. Serial serum samples collected over short intervals from lupus-prone MRL/MP-lpr/lpr and BXSB mice were tested by ELISA on chromatin and its substructures to characterize the initial autoimmune response to these antigens. Direct binding studies demonstrated that the early autoantibodies recognized discontinuous epitopes on native chromatin and the (H2A-H2B)-DNA subnucleosome. As the immune response progressed, native DNA and other chromatin constituents generally became antigenic. Based on adsorption studies and IgG subclass restriction, antibodies to native DNA were more related to chromatin than to denatured DNA. The kinetics of autoantibody appearance and the Ig class distribution were similar to the kinetics and distribution seen in antibodies induced by immunization with an exogenous T-dependent antigen. These results are most consistent with the view that autoantibodies reacting with chromatin are generated by autoimmunization with chromatin, and antibodies to native DNA are a subset of the wide spectrum of antichromatin autoantibodies.

Autoantibodies associated with lupus induced by diverse drugs target a similar epitope in the (H2A-H2B)-DNA complex

IgG reactivity with the (H2A-H2B)-DNA complex, a subunit of the nucleosome, has been detected in many patients with lupus induced by procainamide and quinidine, but the similarity among the epitopes targeted by these antibodies in this heterogeneous patient group as well as the prevalence of this specificity in lupus induced by other drugs is unknown. Studies with histone-DNA complexes formed by sequential addition on a solid phase demonstrated that complexes containing single histones had negligible antigenicity, indicating that DNA stabilizes a protein epitope in the H2A-H2B dimer or that the complete epitope is generated by a surface feature involving H2A-H2B and DNA. F(ab')2 isolated from a patient with procainamide-induced lupus blocked greater than 90% of the anti-[(H2A-H2B)-DNA] reactivity in six of six sera from patients with lupus induced by procainamide, four of four quinidine-induced patients and in sera from patients with lupus induced by acebutolol, penicillamine, and isoniazid, but not methyldopa or auto-antibodies to the component macromolecules. Fab fragments purified from the IgG of two quinidine-induced lupus patients and patients with isoniazid- and procainamide-induced lupus retained 39% +/- 8% of their original IgG reactivity compared to 34 +/- 28% of the original anti-tetanus toxoid activity of Fab fragments in two of the same sera and two normal sera. These results indicate that anti-[(H2A-H2B)-DNA] does not require divalent antigen-antibody complexes for stability, and that the complete epitope is created by the monomeric, trimolecular histone-DNA complex. We conclude that despite their pharmacologic and chemical heterogeneity, many lupus-inducing drugs elicit near identical autoantibodies.

Drug-induced anti-histone autoantibodies display two patterns of reactivity with substructures of chromatin

Increasing evidence suggests that autoantibodies in the rheumatic diseases are a consequence of immune selection by self-material, but the nature of the in vivo immunogen is unknown. Insight into this problem may be obtained by measuring autoantibody binding to various forms of a target antigen. Antihistone antibodies arising as a side effect of therapy with various drugs offer an opportunity to explore this premise because many forms of histone have been characterized and adapted to ELISA formats. Two patterns of antibody reactivity were observed. All 21 patients with symptomatic procainamide-induced lupus and 7 of 12 patients with quinidine-induced lupus had IgG antibodies reacting predominantly with the (H2A-H2B)-DNA complex and with chromatin. In contrast, antibodies in 19 of 24 patients taking procainamide without accompanying lupus-like symptoms did not show any pattern. The second pattern was observed in 18/19 chlorpromazine-treated patients and 14/17 patients with hydralazine-induced lupus in which IgM antibodies displayed more reactivity with DNA-free histones than with the corresponding histone-DNA complexes and almost no binding to H1-stripped chromatin. Absorption studies were entirely consistent with these results. Thus, the two patterns of reactivity with nucleosomal components reflect the molecular substructure of chromatin, suggesting that two processes underlie antihistone antibody induction by drugs. In one, IgG autoantibodies appear to be elicited by chromatin, whereas in the other, autoimmune tolerance to native chromatin appears largely intact, and IgM antibodies may be driven by DNA-free histone.

Analysis of the changes in the structure and hydration of the nucleosome core particle at moderate ionic strengths

In order to better understand the conformational changes induced in the nucleosome core particle by changes in the ionic strength of the media in the range from 0.1 to 0.6 M NaCl, we have conducted a very detailed structural analysis, combining circular dichroism, DNase I digestion, and sedimentation equilibrium. The results of such analysis indicate that the secondary structure of both DNA and histones exhibits small (approximately 5%) but noticeable changes as the salt increases within this range. In the case of DNA, the data are consistent with a trend toward a more relaxed secondary structure. The DNase I pattern of digestion is also altered by the salt and suggests a DNA relaxation around the flanking ends. From the hydrodynamic measurements, we also observe a significant change in the virial coefficients of the particle as the salt increases, which in turn are in very good agreement with the theoretically expected values. Furthermore, the preferential hydration parameter is also found to increase with the salt. We believe that the self-dependent conformational change of the nucleosome core particle is the result of the conjunction of all these subtle changes. Yet, from the present data, their exact relationship to the tertiary structure of the whole particle at the different ionic strengths cannot be exactly defined.

Spectroscopic studies on histone-DNA interactions. I. The interaction of histone (H2A, H2B) dimer with DNA: DNA sequence dependence

Binding of the histone (H2A, H2B) dimer with chicken erythrocyte DNA has been studied by salt-titration spectroscopy in equilibrium conditions. The circular dichroism of DNA near 275 nm is depressed by the interaction with (H2A, H2B) at low concentrations of salt. The depression increases with increasing amounts of (H2A, H2B), and reaches a plateau at an (H2A, H2B) to DNA ratio of 1.5 (w/w), at which one (H2A, H2B) dimer occupies 28 base-pairs of DNA. The fluorescence emission intensity of the tyrosine residues in (H2A, H2B) is depressed by the H2A, H2B)-DNA interaction. When the DNA-(H2A, H2B) complex is titrated with NaCl, these two signals show transitions with increasing ionic strength of the buffer, whose normalized transition curves agree well. The midpoint of the transition is about 0.42 M-NaCl for a sample with a DNA concentration of 0.05 mg/ml and an (H2A, H2B) to DNA ratio of 0.4 (w/w). The fluorescence titration curves have been analyzed to obtain the binding constant for the (H2A, H2B) dimer with DNA. The sample concentration dependence of the titration profiles is consistent with the model of non-cooperative binding of (H2A, H2B) dimer to DNA. The titration profiles are reversible. The obtained binding constant for the (H2A, H2B) dimer with chicken erythrocyte DNA at 20 degrees C (pH 7.6), as a function of the ionic strength, I, is as follows: log10K = -14.9 log10(I)-1.2. The change of enthalpy delta H accompanied by the binding of the (H2A, H2B) dimer is nearly equal to zero, within an error of +/- 1.4 kcal/mol (1 cal = 4.184 J). DNA sequence dependence of the stability of DNA-(H2A, H2B) interactions is observed using reconstituted materials of synthetic DNAs. A decreasing stability of the interaction is observed following the order: the duplex of poly[(dA)-(dT)] greater than chicken erythrocyte DNA or the copolymer duplex of poly(dA).poly(dT) greater than the duplex of poly[(dG)-(dC)]. The difference in free energy of the association of the (H2A,H2B) dimer between the two copolymers is 0.8 kcal/mol.