What is the role of the helical domain of Gsalpha in the GTPase reaction?

Genotype-phenotype correlations in pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a patients: a systemic review

BACKGROUND

Pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1a (PHP1a) is a rare endocrine disease caused by partial defects of the α subunit of the stimulatory Guanosin triphosphate (GTP) binding protein (Gsα) resulting from maternal GNAS gene variation. The clinical manifestations are related to PTH resistance (hypocalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and elevated serum intact PTH) in the presence or absence of multihormone resistance, and Albright's hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO).

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the molecular genetics results and clinical characteristics as well as to explore the correlations between them.

METHODS

Articles pertaining to PHP1a until May, 31, 2021 were reviewed and 527 patients with genetic diagnosis were included in the data analysis. The clinical characteristics and molecular genetics results of these patients were analyzed and compared to explore the correlations between them.

RESULTS

A total of 258 GNAS rare variants (RVs) were identified in 527 patients. The RVs were most commonly found in exons 1 and 7 (17.6% each), with frameshift (36.8%), and missense (31.3%) being the main types of RVs. The median age of onset was 5.0 years old. The most common clinical manifestations were elevation of PTH (86.7%) and AHO (87.5%). Thyroid stimulating hormone resistance was the most common hormone resistance (75.5%) other than PTH resistance. Patients with missense and in-frame RVs had lower incidence rates of the round face (P = .001) and subcutaneous ossifications (P < .001) than those with loss-of-function (non-sense, frameshift, splicing site variants, and large deletions) variants.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed the correlation between loss-of-function RVs with round faces and subcutaneous ossifications in PHP 1a patients. Further exploration of genotype-phenotype correlations through more standardized and prospective studies with long-term follow-up is necessary.

G protein-coupled receptor-G protein interactions: a single-molecule perspective

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate many cellular and physiological processes, responding to a diverse range of extracellular stimuli including hormones, neurotransmitters, odorants, and light. Decades of biochemical and pharmacological studies have provided fundamental insights into the mechanisms of GPCR signaling. Thanks to recent advances in structural biology, we now possess an atomistic understanding of receptor activation and G protein coupling. However, how GPCRs and G proteins interact in living cells to confer signaling efficiency and specificity remains insufficiently understood. The development of advanced optical methods, including single-molecule microscopy, has provided the means to study receptors and G proteins in living cells with unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution. The results of these studies reveal an unexpected level of complexity, whereby GPCRs undergo transient interactions among themselves as well as with G proteins and structural elements of the plasma membrane to form short-lived signaling nanodomains that likely confer both rapidity and specificity to GPCR signaling. These findings may provide new strategies to pharmaceutically modulate GPCR function, which might eventually pave the way to innovative drugs for common diseases such as diabetes or heart failure.

SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION. Structural basis for nucleotide exchange in heterotrimeric G proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) relay diverse extracellular signals into cells by catalyzing nucleotide release from heterotrimeric G proteins, but the mechanism underlying this quintessential molecular signaling event has remained unclear. Here we use atomic-level simulations to elucidate the nucleotide-release mechanism. We find that the G protein α subunit Ras and helical domains-previously observed to separate widely upon receptor binding to expose the nucleotide-binding site-separate spontaneously and frequently even in the absence of a receptor. Domain separation is necessary but not sufficient for rapid nucleotide release. Rather, receptors catalyze nucleotide release by favoring an internal structural rearrangement of the Ras domain that weakens its nucleotide affinity. We use double electron-electron resonance spectroscopy and protein engineering to confirm predictions of our computationally determined mechanism.