Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Systemic combination therapy of intravenous continuous 5-fluorouracil and subcutaneous pegylated interferon alfa-2a for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In Japan, sorafenib is now the first-line therapy for individuals with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but no other treatment is available for such patients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with systemic continuous intravenous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and subcutaneous peginterferon alfa-2a, which was used before sorafenib was introduced to Japan.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-three HCC patients, who were not amenable to curative surgery, percutaneous ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and for whom intraarterial chemotherapy was not indicated because of the presence of extrahepatic metastasis or stenosis of the common hepatic artery, received peginterferon alfa-2a (90 μg subcutaneously on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) and 5-FU (500 mg/day intravenously given continuously on days 1-5 and 8-12). We assessed their response to treatment and survival, and treatment safety.

RESULTS

The response rate was 9.4 % (including six patients with complete response) and the disease-control rate was 32.7 %. The median time to progression was 2.0 months. The overall median survival time was 6.5 months (Child-Pugh class A: 9.2 months vs. Child-Pugh class B: 2.8 months). In a multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status >0, Child-Pugh class B, and the presence of macroscopic vascular invasion were independent predictors of poor prognosis. The major grade 3-4 adverse events were leucopenia (13.9 %) and thrombocytopenia (5.8 %). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This combination therapy was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy. Further studies are needed to establish the usefulness of this treatment.

Phase II study with a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, UFT, and leucovorin in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. Because HCC usually presents as an advanced disease and occurs in the background of liver cirrhosis, most patients are not suitable for treatment with curative intent, thus effective systemic chemotherapy is required. However, the outcome of systemic chemotherapy has been disappointing in advanced HCC. This study was conducted to test the efficacy and toxicity of the combined regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT moderated by leucovorin in advanced or recurrent HCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All 53 patients received epirubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v.) on day 1 and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 i.v.) after epirubicin administration. Oral UFT 400-600 mg/day, determined by body surface area, and leucovorin 75 mg/day were administered for 21 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day drug free interval.

RESULTS

Nine had a partial response, representing 16.9% of response rate (95% confidence interval rate; 7.0-26.8%) with median response duration of 17.1 weeks (95% CI; 5.0-29.3 weeks, range; 7.1-51.7 weeks). Fifteen patients had stable disease and the disease progressed in 26 patients. The median overall survival for the patients was 24.6 weeks (95% CI; 17.3-31.9 weeks, range; 3.0-131.3 weeks). The main toxicities were hematologic toxicities including neutropenia, which reached grade 3/4 in 17 patients (38.5%), and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in five patients (9.4%).

CONCLUSION

The combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and UFT moderated by leucovorin showed modest anti-tumor activity with relatively tolerable toxicities. However, a randomized phase III trial based on this regimen is warranted to clarify its survival benefit in patients with advanced HCC.

A Phase II Trial of UFT and Leucovorin in Women 65 Years and Older With Advanced Breast Cancer

The incidence of breast cancer increases with age. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral UFT (ftorafur plus uracil) plus leucovorin in elderly patients with advanced breast cancer. Eligibility criteria included age > or =65 years, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, < or =1 prior chemotherapy regimens in the setting of metastatic disease, performance status 0-2, and adequate end-organ function. UFT at 300 mg/m2 per day as 2 divided doses and 30 mg leucovorin with each dose were administered orally daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day rest period. Ten patients were accrued. Six patients received treatment in their first relapse and 3 in their second. One patient was chemotherapy-naive. The dose-limiting toxicity was diarrhea with grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurring more often in the oldest patients (1 of 6 patients between 65 and 69 vs. 3 of 4 patients > or =70 years old). Protocol treatment was discontinued in 2 patients (ages 78 and 83) secondary to severe gastrointestinal toxicity. One patient achieved a partial response. Although UFT/leucovorin had efficacy in 1 patient, toxicity in the patients over 70 years of age was increased. Careful evaluation of anticancer drug toxicity in very elderly patients is important as our population ages.

A phase II trial of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin for metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of the current study was to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil, mitoxantrone, and cisplatin (FMP therapy) in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Fifty-one patients with metastatic HCC who had not undergone previous systemic chemotherapy were enrolled. The therapy consisted of intravenous administration of 80 mg/m2 cisplatin and 6 mg/m2 mitoxantrone on Day 1 and continuous intravenous infusion of 450 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil per day on Days 1-5. The treatment was repeated every 4 weeks for a maximum of 6 courses with dose adjustments based on the observed toxic effects if there was no evidence of tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 51 enrolled patients, 14 (27%) achieved a partial response (95% confidence interval, 16-42%) with a median duration of 7.6 months (range, 2.3-18.4 months). Twenty-seven patients (53%) showed no change and 9 (18%) had progressive disease. The median survival time, 1-year survival rate, and median progression-free survival time for all patients were 11.6 months, 44.3%, and 4.0 months, respectively. The main Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were leukocytopenia (67%), neutropenia (71%), thrombocytopenia (27%), and elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (37%) and alanine aminotransferase (41%). These symptoms were generally brief and reversible, with the exception of one treatment-related death due to acute hepatic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

FMP therapy had significant antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic HCC.

Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Whilst local treatments are useful in selected patients, they are not suitable for many with advanced disease. Here, we review phase II and III trials for systemic therapy of advanced disease, finding no strong evidence that any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, or immunotherapy regimen trialled to date benefits survival in this setting. Many trials were inadequately powered, single centre, and enrolled highly selected patients. From this review, we cannot recommend any therapeutic approach in these patients outside of a clinical trial setting. Including an untreated control arm in clinical trials in HCC is still justified. Every effort should be made to enroll these patients into adequately powered trials, and promising phase II results must be tested in a multicentre phase III setting, preferably against a placebo control arm. Prevention of hepatitis B and C remains vital to decrease deaths from HCC.

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using two different schedules

BACKGROUND

New therapies are needed to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Various gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combinations have been tested recently in patients with ovarian and pancreatic carcinoma, yielding interesting results with little toxicity. Therefore, the authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of two such combinations in patients with HCC.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled prospectively in the study. Eleven patients received gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 on Day 2 (GEMOX-1), and 10 patients received gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 on Day 1 followed by oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 on Day 1 (GEMOX-2). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression developed or until unacceptable adverse effects occurred.

RESULTS

All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. Four patients (19%) achieved objective responses (95% confidence interval, 13-26%), including 3 patients in the GEMOX-1 group and 1 patient in the GEMOX-2 group. Ten patients (48%) had stable disease, and 7 patients (33%) experienced disease progression. The median progression-free survival was 5 months, and the median overall survival was 12 months. Fifty-four percent of patients in the GEMOX-1 group and 50% of patients in the GEMOX-2 group had received previous systemic chemotherapy or cisplatin-based chemoembolization. Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity, according to National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, consisted of thrombocytopenia (GEMOX-1 vs. GEMOX-2, 18% vs. 40%) and neutropenia (0% vs. 30%). No Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed, except for 1 episode of Grade 3 diarrhea. Grade 1 neurotoxicity and Grade 2 neurotoxicity (specific scale), respectively, were observed in 4 patients and 7 patients receiving GEMOX-1 and in 7 patients and 1 patient receiving GEMOX-2.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine-oxaliplatin combination therapy is feasible in patients with advanced HCC. The GEMOX-1 regimen was tolerated better than the GEMOX-2 regimen. Currently, the GEMOX-1 regimen is being evaluated in a Phase II study in previously untreated patients with HCC.

The oral fluorinated pyrimidines

The fluorinated pyrimidines have played a major role in the treatment of many common tumors since 5-fluorouracil (5FU) was first introduced. Studies of the cellular and clinical pharmacology of 5FU have led to an improved understanding of the mechanisms of action of this agent. This knowledge has allowed the optimal and rational development of fluoropyrimidine therapy, with significant therapeutic advances in recent years. Efforts to improve the therapeutic index of 5FU have included alteration of schedule, and the addition of biochemical modulators such as folinic acid. Although protracted continuous infusion of 5FU has led to better response rates and decreased toxicity, the administration of 5FU by protracted infusion is not only costly, but also inconvenient to the patient. Furthermore it is often associated with infectious and thrombotic complications related to the required indwelling intravenous catheter. Protracted oral administration is a rational route for administering 5FU, being preferred by the patient and the pharmaco-economist. The unpredictable and low oral bioavailability of 5FU initially discouraged this form of treatment. This problem has now been overcome by the new generation of oral fluoropyrimidines. Two main strategies have been pursued: 1) The administration of an inactive prodrug of 5FU, which is absorbed intact, and subsequently converted to 5FU. Capecitabine is converted to 5FU by a 3 step enzymatic process. 2) The administration of 5FU with an inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) to minimise the erratic absorption and variable clearance of 5FU: the preparations UFT, S1, and ethinyluracil/5FU contain an oral fluoropyrimidine co-administered orally with inhibitors of this enzyme. The development and characteristics of these agents are discussed.