Resection margin status in lumpectomy specimens of infiltrating lobular carcinoma

Tracking tumor heterogeneity and progression with near-infrared II fluorophores

Heterogeneous cells are the main feature of tumors with unique genetic and phenotypic characteristics, which can stimulate differentially the progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. Importantly, heterogeneity is pervasive in human malignant tumors, and identification of the degree of tumor heterogeneity in individual tumors and progression is a critical task for tumor treatment. However, current medical tests cannot meet these needs; in particular, the need for noninvasive visualization of single-cell heterogeneity. Near-infrared II (NIR-II, 1000-1700 nm) imaging exhibits an exciting prospect for non-invasive monitoring due to the high temporal-spatial resolution. More importantly, NIR-II imaging displays more extended tissue penetration depths and reduced tissue backgrounds because of the significantly lower photon scattering and tissue autofluorescence than traditional the near-infrared I (NIR-I) imaging. In this review, we summarize systematically the advances made in NIR-II in tumor imaging, especially in the detection of tumor heterogeneity and progression as well as in tumor treatment. As a non-invasive visual inspection modality, NIR-II imaging shows promising prospects for understanding the differences in tumor heterogeneity and progression and is envisioned to have the potential to be used clinically.

Determinants of Breast-Conserving Therapy in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients: A Nationwide Study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence from previous studies and treatment guidelines suggested that breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is the treatment of choice for early-stage breast cancer. However, in the last decades, surgeons have noticed a high percentage of mastectomies done in this population. The aim of this study is to explore the factors associated with not choosing BCT among eligible patients with early-stage breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study uses a retrospective cohort design. Demographic and clinical characteristics derived from The Taiwan Cancer Registry Database, the National Health Insurance Database and the Death File Database from January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2014. Patients were followed until December 31, 2015. To explore the associated factors related to BCT, we used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total sample of 25,967 stage I breast cancer patients was included. Among them, 12,191 underwent BCT and 13,776 underwent mastectomy as their primary treatment. The logistic regression analysis reveals that age, pay-for-performance (P4P) program participation, number of affected lymph nodes, tumor size and location, were determinants of BCT. Interestingly enough, histological type did not reach the significance level.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that personal and clinical characteristics influence the treatment choice in stage 1 breast cancer patients.

Downshifting nanoprobes with follicle stimulating hormone peptide fabrication for highly efficient NIR II fluorescent bioimaging guided ovarian tumor surgery

Failure of intraoperative detection, early minimal lesion and microscopic residual tumor margins elimination causes metastatic diffusion and lethal recurrence. However, during surgical process, surgeons can only rely largely on palpation and visual examination. Intraoperative bioimaging with the aid of the second near-infrared fluorescent (NIR II FL) light has entered the surgical excision area to bridge the gap of preoperative bioimaging and intraoperative resection. Here, we demonstrate that the follicle-stimulating hormone peptide (FSHP) engineered NIR II downshifting nanoparticles (DSNPs@FSHP) selectively undergo efficient ovarian tumor targeting property. Owing to the special biocompatibility of nanoprobes, this strategy provided rapid body clearance and efficient tumor targeting with significantly tumor to background (T/B) ratio enhanced for surgical excision. Based on these, this strategy can successfully empower the detection and surgical removal for both ovarian tumor lesions and ovarian tumor margins by NIR II FL bioimaging.

Multicentric breast cancer with heterogeneous histopathology: a multidisciplinary review

Multiple synchronous (multifocal or multicentric) ipsilateral breast cancers with heterogeneous histopathology are a rare clinical occurrence, however, their incidence is increasing due to the use of MRI for breast cancer screening and staging. Some studies have demonstrated poorer clinical outcomes for this pattern of breast cancer, but there is no evidence to guide clinical practice. In this multidisciplinary review, we reflect on pathology and molecular characteristics, imaging findings, surgical management including conservation and reconstructive options and approach to the axilla, and the role of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Multidisciplinary discussions appear decisive in planning an appropriate surgical choice and defining the correct systemic treatment tailored to each clinical condition.

Success rates of re-excision after positive margins for invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast

Rates of positive margins after surgical resection of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) are high (ranging from 18 to 60%), yet the efficacy of re-excision lumpReceptor subtypeectomy for clearing positive margins is unknown. Concerns about the diffuse nature of ILC may drive increased rates of completion mastectomy to treat positive margins, thus lowering breast conservation rates. We therefore determined the success rate of re-excision lumpectomy in women with ILC and positive margins after surgical resection. We identified 314 cases of stage I-III ILC treated with breast conserving surgery (BCS) at the University of California, San Francisco. Surgical procedures, pathology reports, and outcomes were analyzed using univariate and multivariate statistics and Cox-proportional hazards models. We evaluated outcomes before and after the year 2014, when new margin management consensus guidelines were published. Positive initial margins occurred in 118 (37.6%) cases. Of these, 62 (52.5%) underwent re-excision lumpectomy, which cleared the margin in 74.2%. On multivariate analysis, node negativity was significantly associated with successful re-excision (odds ratio [OR] 3.99, 95% CI 1.15-13.81, p = 0.029). After 2014, we saw fewer initial positive margins (42.7% versus 25.5%, p = 0.009), second surgeries (54.6% versus 20.2%, p < 0.001), and completion mastectomies (27.7% versus 4.5%, p < 0.001). In this large cohort of women with ILC, re-excision lumpectomy was highly successful at clearing positive margins. Additionally, positive margins and completion mastectomy rates significantly decreased over time. These findings highlight improvements in management of ILC, and suggest that completion mastectomy may not be required for those with positive margins after initial BCS.

NIR-II nanoprobes in-vivo assembly to improve image-guided surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer

Local recurrence is a common cause of treatment failure for patients with solid tumors. Tumor-specific intraoperative fluorescence imaging may improve staging and debulking efforts in cytoreductive surgery and, thereby improve prognosis. Here, we report in vivo assembly of the second near-infrared window (NIR-II) emitting downconversion nanoparticles (DCNPs) modified with DNA and targeting peptides to improve the image-guided surgery for metastatic ovarian cancer. The NIR-II imaging quality with DCNPs is superior to that of clinically approved ICG with good photostability and deep tissue penetration (8 mm). Stable tumor retention period experienced 6 h by in vivo assembly of nanoprobes can be used for precise tumor resection. Superior tumor-to-normal tissue ratio is successfully achieved to facilitate the abdominal ovarian metastases surgical delineation. Metastases with ≤1 mm can be completely excised under NIR-II bioimaging guidance. This novel technology provides a general new basis for the future design of nanomaterials for medical applications.

Surgical Options and Locoregional Recurrence in Patients Diagnosed with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast

PURPOSE

Recent consensus guidelines on margins for breast-conserving surgery (BCS) recommend the use of "no ink on tumor" as the standard for an adequate margin. The recommendations extend to invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), but the data on this subset are limited. We reviewed our modern dataset on margin status with outcomes of ILC.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on 736 patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III ILC treated at our cancer center between May 1997 and December 2007. Clinicopathologic data were extracted from the Clinical Research Information Systems Database. Margin status was defined using the latest ASCO/ASTRO/SSO consensus guideline criteria.

RESULTS

The initial surgery performed was mastectomy in 352 patients (48 %) and BCS in 384 patients (52 %). In multivariate analysis, tumor size and multifocality were significantly associated with high rates of mastectomy and positive surgical margins at initial BCS. After initial BCS, additional surgery was performed in 92 patients (24 %). During a 72-month median follow-up period, 12 (3.1 %) ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTR) and 5 (1.3 %) other locoregional recurrences (LRR) were observed. Patients with margins with ink on tumor who did not receive further surgery were found to have significantly increased LRR [odds ratio (OR) 5.5; p = 0.02] and IBTR (OR 8.5; p = 0.006), whereas patients with close margins (1-3 mm) and margins within 1 mm were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the validity of using "no ink on tumor" as the standard for a negative margin for pure and mixed ILC treated with multimodality therapy.

Image-guided tumor resection using real-time near-infrared fluorescence in a syngeneic rat model of primary breast cancer

Tumor involvement of resection margins is found in a large proportion of patients who undergo breast-conserving surgery. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging is an experimental technique to visualize cancer cells during surgery. To determine the accuracy of real-time NIR fluorescence imaging in obtaining tumor-free resection margins, a protease-activatable NIR fluorescence probe and an intraoperative camera system were used in the EMR86 orthotopic syngeneic breast cancer rat model. Influence of concentration, timing and number of tumor cells were tested in the MCR86 rat breast cancer cell line. These variables were significantly associated with NIR fluorescence probe activation. Dosing and tumor size were also significantly associated with fluorescence intensity in the EMR86 rat model, whereas time of imaging was not. Real-time NIR fluorescence guidance of tumor resection resulted in a complete resection of 17 out of 17 tumors with minimal excision of normal healthy tissue (mean minimum and a mean maximum tumor-free margin of 0.2 ± 0.2 mm and 1.3 ± 0.6 mm, respectively). Moreover, the technique enabled identification of remnant tumor tissue in the surgical cavity. Histological analysis revealed that the NIR fluorescence signal was highest at the invasive tumor border and in the stromal compartment of the tumor. In conclusion, NIR fluorescence detection of breast tumor margins was successful in a rat model. This study suggests that clinical introduction of intraoperative NIR fluorescence imaging has the potential to increase the number of complete tumor resections in breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.

Margin assessment after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular cancer

BACKGROUND

Optimal surgical management of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is unknown. We evaluated optimal margin distance and local recurrence (LR) rates for these patients.

METHODS

Ninety-three (30%) of 311 patients with ILC received NAC. We examined margin status, residual disease after re-excision, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Margin positivity rates after the final operative procedure were similar between the NAC and surgery-first group (P > .05). The proportion of patients, stratified by margin status, who were taken back for re-excision was not different between the 2 groups, and, similarly, there were no differences in frequency of residual disease (all P > .05). At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 1 patient in the NAC group and 2 in the surgery-first group developed LR (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ILC who have undergone NAC and have margins >1 mm have a low probability of residual disease and LR.

Intraoperative Frozen Section for Margin Assessment in Breast Conserving Surgery

Background and Aims:

When excisional biopsy or lumpectomy is performed without margin assessment in early breast cancer, further surgery are required if positive margins exist. We evaluated the role of the intraoperative frozen section in breast conserving surgery (BCS). Clinicopathologic factors associated with re-excision were searched.

Material and Methods:

190 tumors in 186 patients with early invasive breast cancer treated by BCS. Breast tumor was excised with 2 cm macroscopic margin, and microscopic margins examined by intraoperative frozen section.

Results:

After frozen section, 160 cases had negative margins (no re-excision), but 30 patients (16%) underwent re-excision because of close/positive margins. Negative margins were obtained in 24 patients but six patients underwent mastectomy due to persistent involved margins. Local recurrence was 2.1% and systemic recurrence was 2.6% with mean 62 months follow-up. Tumor type, tumor size, extranodal extension and extensive intraductal component were significant predictors of re-excision by multivariate analysis. Re-excision procedures haven't an impact on local recurrence.

Conclusions:

Intraoperative frozen section is an effective procedure in reducing the need of second operation. We have observed lower recurrence rates than other studies because of our 2 cm macroscopic margin width and > 2 mm microscopic negative margin which obtained by intraoperative frozen section.

Evidence based radiation oncology: Breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiotherapy is, similar to surgery, a local treatment. In the case of breast cancer, it is generally given after conservative or after more extensive, tumour and patient adapted, surgery. The target volumes can be the breast and/or the thoracic wall and/or the regional lymph node areas. The integration and the extent of radiotherapy as part of the comprehensive treatment of the breast cancer patient, including the amount of surgery and the sequencing with the systemic treatments, has to be well discussed with all medical specialists involved in treating breast cancer on a multidisciplinary basis. Guidelines for the appropriate prescription and execution of radiotherapy are of utmost importance. However, individualisation based on the individual patients' and tumours' characteristics should always be envisaged.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on a review of the literature the level of evidence that is available for the indications for radiotherapy is summarised, as well as the main clinical questions that are unanswered today. An overview of the recent and ongoing clinical trails in breast cancer will highlight some of the current ongoing debates.

CONCLUSIONS

In the case of breast cancer, radiotherapy, given after as well conservative as extensive risk-adapted surgery, significantly reduces the risk of local and regional recurrences. Especially for patients with an intermediate to high absolute risk for local recurrences, a positive influence on overall survival has been shown, notably when appropriate radiotherapy techniques are used. Most important is that the best results that we can offer to our breast cancer patients for all clinical endpoints (local and regional control; quality of life; cosmetic results; survival) can be obtained by a multidisciplinary and patient-oriented approach, involving all those involved in the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Margin status and the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving treatment of lobular breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular breast carcinoma is known for its multicentricity and is associated with a higher incidence of incomplete excision after breast-conserving therapy. The aim of the study was to examine the influence of positive surgical margins on the local recurrence rate in patients diagnosed with invasive lobular cancer and treated with breast-conserving therapy.

METHODS

All 416 women diagnosed with invasive lobular breast cancer and undergoing breast-conserving treatment between 1995 and 2002 were selected from the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry. Their medical charts were reviewed and detailed information was collected.

RESULTS

The risk of margin involvement was 29% after the first operation and 17% when taking into account the final margin status of the patients undergoing re-excision. During follow-up, 18 patients developed a local recurrence. The 5 year actuarial risk of developing a local recurrence was 3.5% (95% confidence interval 2.5-4.5) and the 8 year risk was 6.4% (95% confidence interval 4.7-8.0). There was no influence of positive surgical margins on the risk of local recurrence, neither in the univariate analysis nor after adjustment for age, tumour size, nodal status and adjuvant systemic treatment.

CONCLUSION

Patients with invasive lobular cancer, treated with breast-conservation, have a low risk of local recurrence, despite their high risk of having a microscopically incomplete excision of the tumour.

Identifying patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation for lobular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The association of invasive lobular carcinoma with high rates of compromised margins in breast conservation makes choice of operation for these patients difficult. We sought to identify patients at risk of compromised margins following breast conservation surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed all patients with invasive lobular and invasive ductal carcinoma over a 5-year period (1999-2004). The imaging, pathology and surgical details of patients with invasive lobular carcinoma undergoing breast conservation were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 991 patients with invasive ductal carcinoma and 150 patients with invasive lobular carcinoma were identified. Lobular carcinomas had a compromised margin rate of 49% (n = 38/77) in breast conservation compared to 24% (n = 143/588) of ductal carcinomas (P < .0001). Mammographic size (P = .017), pathological size (P = .01), age (P = .03), multifocality (P < .0001), and lymphovascular invasion (P = .015) were significantly associated with compromised margins.

CONCLUSION

Invasive lobular carcinoma has a 49% rate of compromised margins following breast conservation. Mammographic size greater than 1.5 cm and young age were preoperative factors predictive of compromised margins.

Factors associated with surgical options for breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) and mastectomy have equivalent survival outcomes for women with breast carcinoma, but treatment decisions are affected by many factors. The current study evaluated the impact of patient and physician factors on surgical decision-making.

METHODS

Statistical analyses were performed on a prospective multicenter study of patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Patient, physician, and geographic factors were considered.

RESULTS

Of 4086 patients, BCS was performed in 2762 (67.6%) and mastectomy was performed in 1324 (32.4%). The median tumor size was 1.5 cm (range, < 0.1-9.0 cm) in patients undergoing BCS and 1.9 cm (range, 0.1-11.0 cm) in patients undergoing mastectomy (P < 0.00001). The median age of patients undergoing BCS was 59 years (range, 27-100 yrs), whereas patients who underwent mastectomy were older (median age of 63 yrs, range, 27-96 yrs [P < 0.00001]). Physicians in academic practices performed more lumpectomies than those who were not in an academic practice (70.9% vs. 65.7%; P = 0.001). More breast conservation procedures were performed by surgeons with a higher percentage of breast practice (P = 0.012). Geographic location was found to be significant, with the Northeast having the highest rate of breast conservation (70.8%) and the Southeast having the lowest (63.2%; P = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, patient age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.455; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.247-1.699 [P < 0.001]), tumor size (P < 0.001), tumor palpability (OR: 0.613; 95% CI, 0.524-0.716 [P < 0.001]), histologic subtype (P = 0.018), tumor location in the breast (P < 0.001), physician academic affiliation (OR: 1.193; 95% CI: 1.021-1.393 [P = 0.026]), and geographic location (P = 0.045) were found to be significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment decisions were found to be related to patient clinicopathologic features, surgeon academic affiliation, and geographic location. Future studies will elucidate the communication and psychosocial factors that may influence patient decision-making.

Similar long-term results of breast-conservation treatment for Stage I and II invasive lobular carcinoma compared with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: The University of Pennsylvania experience

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to determine the long-term results of breast-conservation treatment in women with early-stage, invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

METHODS

Between 1977 and 1995, 1093 women with Stage I and II invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and 55 women with invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast underwent lumpectomy, axillary lymph node dissection, and radiation treatment. Overall, 49% of the women received adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or hormones).

RESULTS

The median age was 52 years for patients in the invasive ductal group and 54 years for patients in the invasive lobular group. The median follow-up was 8.7 years and 10.2 years for patients in the invasive ductal and invasive lobular groups, respectively. A comparison of patients who had invasive lobular carcinoma with patients who had invasive ductal carcinoma showed no difference in the 10-year actuarial rates of overall survival (85% vs. 79%, respectively; P = 0.73), cause-specific survival (93% vs. 84%, respectively; P = 0.85), or freedom from distant metastases (81% vs. 80%, respectively; P = 0.76). The 10-year rates of local failure were 18% for patients with invasive lobular carcinoma and 12% for patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (P = 0.24), and the 10-year rates of contralateral breast carcinoma development for the 2 groups were 12% and 8%, respectively (P = 0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast-conservation treatment yielded similar long-term results for women with early-stage, invasive lobular carcinoma and women with the more prevalent invasive ductal carcinoma.

Lumpectomy margins are affected by tumor size and histologic subtype but not by biopsy technique

OBJECTIVE

The effect of the type of biopsy (needle vs. excisional) on lumpectomy margin status has not been well established. The objective of this study was to determine whether needle biopsy is associated with a higher positive margin rate at time of lumpectomy.

METHODS

We evaluated this hypothesis in the setting of a prospective multi-institutional study. A total of 3975 patients were enrolled in the University of Louisville Breast Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Study from May 7, 1998 to June 3, 2003. Patients who underwent lumpectomy at the time of their sentinel lymph node biopsy were the focus of this analysis. Patients with clinical stage T1 N0 and T2 N0breast cancer were eligible; 29 patients were found to have T3 tumors on final pathology. Pathologists at each institution defined margin positivity, and tumor at the inked margin of resection was the study guideline.

RESULTS

Median patient age was 59 years, and median tumor size was 1.5 cm. A total of 2658 patients underwent lumpectomy with the following results. The cancer of 1515 patients was diagnosed by fine-needle or core-needle biopsy and of 821 patients was diagnosed by excisional biopsy; in 322 patients the method of diagnosis was unknown. The type of previous biopsy did not significantly affect the positive-margin rate at the time of lumpectomy (13.3% vs. 11.0% for needle and excisional biopsy, respectively, P = 0.107). However, patients with larger tumors were more often found to have a positive margin (11.4% vs. 13.9% vs. 27.6% for T1, T2, and T3 tumors, respectively; P = 0.010). No difference was found in margin status after excision of palpable versus nonpalpable tumors (10.6% vs. 10.9%, respectively, P = 0.743). Histologic subtype, however, did affect margin status (15.8% vs. 9.8% positive margins for lobular vs. ductal type, respectively, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multi-institutional study, increasing tumor size and lobular histologic subtype were associated with a greater likelihood of a positive margin. The type of biopsy, needle or excisional, had no effect on the ability to achieve negative margins.

Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of intraoperative margin assessment in obtaining clear margins in conserving surgery for breast cancer.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty patients undergoing wide local excision (WLE) for core biopsy proven primary invasive breast cancer, during a 30 months period, were included in the study. Following surgical excision the breast specimen was orientated with sutures, inked using India ink and coloured pigments and incised to identify the tumour, maintaining orientation. The distance to the individual radial margins were estimated macroscopically by the pathologist and conveyed intraoperatively to the surgeon. A macroscopic tumour-margin distance of less than 10 mm was considered compromised and the margin(s) in question was then excised if feasible.

RESULTS

Eighty-one patients (37%) were judged to have compromised margins following intraoperative macroscopic evaluation and had at least one margin re-excised. Sixteen of the 81 patients (20%) in this subgroup had compromised margins on microscopy and required a second operation. One hundred and thirty-nine patients (63%) were deemed to have clear margins intraoperatively, subsequently confirmed on microscopic examination in 135 patients (97%). Intraoperative macroscopic assessment of margin status was associated with 9.1% of patients requiring a second operation. In the absence of intraoperative assessment of margin status a further 47 patients (21.4%) would have required a second operation.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative macroscopic margin assessment is an effective technique in reducing the number of second operative procedures in patients undergoing conserving surgery for primary invasive breast cancer.

Hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

The treatment of postmenopausal women with breast cancer presents a number of challenges. Tamoxifen has had a substantial impact on mortality in women with early-stage, estrogen-receptor-positive tumors. Despite the improvement in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients will ultimately experience a recurrence. Present treatment approaches can provide effective palliation in the advanced disease setting, but, at best, there has been a modest impact on survival. Numerous options are now available to provide effective palliation for patients with advanced disease. These options include antiestrogens, pure antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors and progestins and LHRH agonists. Recently, several studies have reviewed the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors as first-line agents in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole and letrozole have recently been approved as first-line agents in women with metastatic breast cancer. In addition to their role in metastatic breast, trials investigating the potential of aromatase inhibitors in the early breast cancer, both in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting are underway.

Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving breast conservation therapy have a lifelong risk of local recurrence. To minimize this risk, surgeons have explored various approaches to examining the surgical margins of the resection specimen. If tumor cells are found at the margin, there is a high probability that residual tumor remains in the surgical cavity. This review examines published reports about standard and innovative approaches to assessing surgical margins, the clinical significance of margin size, and risk factors for positive margins.

METHODS

Published literature abstracted in Medline was reviewed using the Gateway site from the National Library of Medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

It is still not clear whether obtaining a radical margin will decrease the rate of local recurrence after breast conserving surgery. What is clear is that it is absolutely unacceptable to have tumor cells directly at the cut edge of the excised specimen, regardless of the type of post-surgical adjuvant therapy.