In vivo treatment of rats with unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) does not affect experimentally induced colon carcinoma metastasis

The Antineoplastic Effect of Heparin on Colorectal Cancer: A Review of the Literature

Heparin and derivatives are commonly used for thrombophylaxis in surgical colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Recent studies have suggested that, besides its protective effect on the incidence of venous thromboembolism, heparin has an anti-cancer effect. The aim of this review was to explore the literature and report the antineoplastic effect of heparin and derivatives on CRC. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for relevant articles. Nineteen studies were included (n = 19). Fifteen were lab studies conducted in vivo or in vitro on CRC cell lines and/or mice (n = 15). Four were in vivo clinical studies (n = 4). CRC tumor growth was reduced by 78% in one study, (p < 0.01), while tumorigenesis was suppressed in heparin-treated mice in seven studies. A high dose of low molecular weight heparin for extended duration significantly reduced post-operative VEGF, suggesting that such a regime may inhibit tumor angiogenesis and distant metastasis. A randomized trial demonstrated the antineoplastic effect of nadroparin as the 6 month survival in palliative patients increased. Another study has reported that disease-free survival of CRC patients was not affected by a similar tinzaparin regime. The anti-cancer properties of heparin and derivatives are promising, especially in lab studies. Further clinical trials are needed to investigate the anti-cancer benefit of heparin on CRC.

A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin as an anticancer therapeutic in preclinical animal models

OBJECTIVE

The therapeutic effects of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) may extend past thrombosis prevention, with preclinical evidence demonstrating anti-metastatic properties. Clinical evidence on the topic, however, remains controversial. A systematic review of preclinical evidence may help elucidate reasons for this contradictory evidence. The objective of our systematic review is to assess the anti-metastatic properties of LMWHs in solid tumour animal models.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and PubMed were searched from inception to May 12th, 2020. All articles were screened independently and in duplicate. Studies that compared LMWH to a placebo or no treatment arm in solid tumour animal models were included. The primary outcome was the burden of metastasis. Secondary outcomes included primary tumour growth and mortality. The risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using a modified Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included in the review. Administration of a LMWH was associated with a significant decrease in the burden of metastasis (SMD -2.18; 95% CI -2.66 to -1.70). Additionally, the administration of a LMWH was also associated with a significant reduction in primary tumour growth (SMD -1.95; 95% CI -2.56 to -1.34) and risk of death (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). All included studies were deemed to be at an unclear risk of bias for at least one methodological criterion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that LMWH can effectively reduce metastatic burden and reduce tumour growth in preclinical animal models of solid tumour malignancies. Reasons for the contradiction with clinical evidence require further exploration.

Unfractionated heparin displaces sFlt-1 from the placental extracellular matrix

Soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (sFlt-1) is an anti-angiogenic protein which is secreted by numerous cell types and acts as a decoy receptor for the angiogenic protein vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Despite its physiologic importance in maintaining angiogenic balance, excess sFlt-1 levels are associated with the pathogenesis of many diseases, especially those with angiogenic imbalance, endothelial dysfunction, and hypertension. Although sFlt-1 is a soluble protein, it contains a binding site for the extracellular matrix component heparan sulfate. This allows cells to retain and localize sFlt-1 in order to prevent excessive VEGF signaling. During pregnancy, placental syncytiotrophoblasts develop a large extracellular matrix which contains significant amounts of heparan sulfate. Consequently, the placenta becomes a potential storage site for large amounts of sFlt-1 bound to extracellular heparan sulfate. Additionally, it should be noted that sFlt-1 can bind to the anticoagulant unfractionated heparin due to its molecular mimicry to heparan sulfate. However, it remains unknown whether unfractionated heparin can compete with heparan sulfate for binding of localized sFlt-1. In this study, we hypothesized that administration of unfractionated heparin would displace and solubilize placental extracellular matrix(ECM)-bound sFlt-1. If unfractionated heparin can displace this large reservoir of sFlt-1 in the placenta and mobilized it into the maternal circulation, we should be able to observe its effects on maternal angiogenic balance and blood pressure. To test this hypothesis, we utilized in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo methods. Using the BeWo placental trophoblast cell line, we observed increased sFlt-1 in the media of cells treated with unfractionated heparin compared to controls. The increase in media sFlt-1 was found in conjunction with decreased localized cellular Flt (sFlt-1 and Flt-1) as measured by total cell fluorescence. Similar results were observed using ex vivo placental villous explants treated with unfractionated heparin. Real-time quantitative PCR of the explants showed no change in sFlt-1 or heparanase-1 mRNA expression, eliminating increased production and enzymatic cleavage of heparan sulfate as causes for sFlt-1 media increase. Timed-pregnant rats given a continuous infusion of unfractionated heparin exhibited an increased mean arterial pressure as well as decreased bioavailable VEGF compared to vehicle-treated animals. These data demonstrate that chronic unfractionated heparin treatment is able to displace matrix-bound sFlt-1 into the maternal circulation to such a degree that mean arterial pressure is significantly affected. Here we have shown that the placental ECM is a storage site for large quantities of sFlt-1, and that it should be carefully considered in future studies concerning angiogenic balance in pregnancy.

The direct oral anticoagulants rivaroxaban and dabigatran do not inhibit orthotopic growth and metastasis of human breast cancer in mice

Essentials Factor Xa (FXa)-targeting direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce venous thromboembolism (VTE) The effects of FXa-targeting DOACs on cancer progression remain to be studied In xenograft models, a FXa-targeting DOAC did not inhibit breast cancer growth and metastasis A thrombin-targeting DOAC, dabigatran, also did not inhibit breast cancer growth and metastasis ABSTRACT: Background Factor Xa-targeting DOACs were recently found to reduce recurrent VTE efficiently in cancer patients when compared to the standard treatment with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs). While the anticancer effects of LMWHs have been extensively studied in preclinical cancer models, the effects of FXa-targeting DOACs on cancer progression remain to be studied. Objective We investigated whether the FXa-targeting DOAC rivaroxaban and the thrombin-targeting DOAC dabigatran etexilate (DE) affected human breast cancer growth and metastasis in orthotopic xenograft models. Methods/results Mice that were put on a custom-made chow diet supplemented with rivaroxaban (0.4 or 1.0 mg/g diet) or dabigatran etexilate (DE) (10 mg/g diet) showed prolonged ex vivo coagulation times (prothrombin time [PT] and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT] assay, respectively). However, rivaroxaban and DE did not inhibit MDA-MB-231 tumor growth and metastasis formation in lungs or livers of 7-week-old fully immunodeficient NOD/SCID/ƴC-/- (NSG) mice. Comparable data were obtained for rivaroxaban-treated mice when using NOD-SCID mice. Rivaroxaban and DE treatment also did not significantly inhibit tumor growth and metastasis formation when using another human triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell line (HCC1806) in NOD-SCID mice. The FXa and thrombin-induced gene expression of the downstream target CXCL8 in both cell lines, but FXa and thrombin, did not significantly stimulate migration, proliferation, or stemness in vitro. Conclusion Although effectively inhibiting coagulation, the DOACs rivaroxaban and DE did not inhibit orthotopic growth and metastasis of human TNBC. It remains to be investigated whether DOACs exert antitumorigenic effects in other types of cancer.

The dual role of mast cells in tumor fate

The exact role of mast cells in tumor growth is not clear and multifaceted. In some cases, mast cells stimulate while in others inhibit this process. This dual role may be explained to some extent by the huge number of bioactive molecules stored in mast cell granules, as well as differences between tumor microenvironment, tumor type, and tumor phase of development.

Anticoagulant therapy of cancer patients: Will patient selection increase overall survival?

Already since the early 1800s, it has been recognised that malignancies may provoke thromboembolic complications, and indeed cancer patients are at increased risk of developing venous thrombosis. Interestingly, case control studies of deep-vein thrombosis suggested that low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) improved survival of cancer patients. This led to the hypothesis that cancer cells might 'take advantage' of a hypercoagulable state to more efficiently metastasise. Initial randomised placebo control trials showed that LMWH improve overall survival of cancer patients, especially in those patients with a relatively good prognosis. The failure of recent phase III trials, however, tempers enthusiasm for anticoagulant treatment in cancer patients despite an overwhelming body of literature showing beneficial effects of anticoagulants in preclinical models. Instead of discarding LMWH as potential (co)treatment modality in cancer patients, these disappointing recent trials should guide future preclinical research on anticoagulants in cancer biology. Most and for all, the underlying mechanisms by which coagulation drives tumour progression need to be elucidated. This could ultimately allow selection of cancer patients most likely to benefit from anticoagulant treatment and/or from targeted therapy downstream of coagulation factor signalling.

Role of vimentin in the inhibitory effects of low-molecular-weight heparin on PC-3M cell adhesion to, and migration through, endothelium

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) has been used in cancer patients with venous thromboembolic complications, resulting in a higher survival rate and an inhibitory action on experimental metastasis. In the present study, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were treated with LMWH for 24 h. We found that the resulting HUVECs could significantly inhibit the highly metastatic human prostate cancer cell line (PC-3M) in terms of its adhesion to the endothelium and migration across the endothelium, according to scanning electron microscopy. We also determined the elevated levels of endothelial intercellular Ca(2+) concentration after the adhesion of PC-3M cells to HUVECs was greatly reduced by incubation with LMWH. Using proteomics, we surveyed the global protein changes in HUVECs after LMWH treatment and identified four down-regulated proteins that were possible isoforms of cytoskeletal vimentin intermediate filaments, cartilage-derived C-type lectin, and serine/threonine protein phosphatase 1β (PP-1B). LMWH affected the morphology of vimentin and the expression levels of α(v) integrin and PP-1B in HUVECs bound to PC-3M cells. Vimentin assists in the adhesion of PC-3M cells, which was confirmed by short interfering RNA experiments. Furthermore, the direct binding of purified vimentin protein with LMWH was detected with surface plasmon resonance methods. However, when we used fluorescence-labeled heparin for 24 h to identify whether this binding occurred within cells, heparin was distributed principally around endothelial cells. Taken together, these findings suggest that the monoincubation of LMWH with HUVECs could inhibit PC-3M cell adhesion to, and migration through, endothelium. LMWH's regulation of vimentin plays a role in the antimetastatic action.

Clinical use of the low-molecular-weight heparins in cancer patients: focus on the improved patient outcomes

Patients with malignant neoplastic diseases represent a high-risk population relative to thromboembolic disease. With the advent of improved and accessible diagnostic technology, for example, ultrasound and/or spiral CT scans, timely diagnosis of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) is readily accomplished. The introduction of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) approximately two decades ago (in contrast to unfractionated heparin and vitamin K antagonists) has provided a class of agents with a favorable therapeutic index. In the review to follow, the literature regarding the use of LMWH in oncologic patient populations is summarized. Topics addressed include prophylaxis, and treatment as well as consideration of the potential anti-neoplastic properties of this class of drugs.

Impact of venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation on cancer and cancer survival

Changes in the hemostatic system and chronic hemostatic activation are frequently observed in patients with cancer, even in the absence of venous thromboembolism (VTE). VTE is a leading cause of death among patients with cancer and contributes to long-term mortality in patients with early as well as advanced-stage cancer. Mounting evidence suggests that components of the clotting cascade and associated vascular factors play an integral part in tumor progression, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis formation. Furthermore, there are intriguing in vitro and animal findings that anticoagulants, in particular the low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), exert an antineoplastic effect through multiple mechanisms, including interference with tumor cell adhesion, invasion, metastasis formation, angiogenesis, and the immune system. Several relatively small randomized controlled clinical trials of anticoagulation as cancer therapy in patients without a VTE diagnosis have been completed. These comprise studies with LMWH, unfractionated heparin, and vitamin K antagonists, with overall encouraging but nonconclusive results and some limitations. Meta-analyses performed for the American Society of Clinical Oncology VTE Guidelines Committee and the Cochrane Collaboration suggest overall favorable effects of anticoagulation on survival of patients with cancer, mainly with LMWH. However, definitive clinical trials have been elusive and questions remain regarding the importance of tumor type and stage on treatment efficacy, the impact of fatal thromboembolic events, optimal anticoagulation therapy, and safety with differing chemotherapy regimens. Although the LMWHs and related agents hold promise for improving outcomes in patients with cancer, additional studies of their efficacy and safety in this setting are needed.

Modest anti-cancer activity of a bile acid acylated heparin derivative in a PC14PE6 induced orthotopic lung cancer model

PURPOSE

A novel chemically modified heparin derivative, heparin-deoxycholic acid nano-particles, has lower anticoagulant activity, and was recently reported to have significant anti-tumor effects on squamous head and neck cancer cells. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-tumor effects of heparin-deoxycholic acid nano-particles in a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An orthotopic lung cancer model in 16 mice was developed using intra-thoracic injections of 0.5x10(6) PC14PE6 cells. Ten days after inoculation, the mice were divided into two groups. PBS and Heparin-DOCA particles were injected once a day every 3 days in the tail vein, for a total of 5 injections. The body weight and survival of each mouse were monitored and the tumor size in the lung was measured by SPECT-CT before and after heparin-DOCA nano-particle treatment.

RESULTS

IThe HD particles had no significant cytotoxicity when the PC9 cells were treated in vitro. There was no statistical difference in tumor size, body weight and survival between the HD treated and control groups in vivo. Furthermore, there was no difference in the amount of CD31 between tumor tissues in the two study groups.

CONCLUSION

HD synthesized with unfractionated heparin had no apparent inhibitory effects on tumor growth in a PC14PE6 cell induced orthotopic lung cancer mouse model. The HD particles did not significantly inhibit tumor-induced angiogenesis at the tumor sites.

Mechanisms of heparin induced anti-cancer activity in experimental cancer models

BACKGROUND

Retrospective analyses of clinical trials and prospective clinical studies have suggested that heparins may have an effect on cancer survival. This putative anti-cancer activity of heparins is supported by data from studies in animal tumour models.

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the various potential mechanisms of heparin anti-cancer activity we evaluated the data from pre-clinical studies in which heparins have been tested as anti-cancer therapy.

METHODS

Pre-clinical studies, published between 1960 and 2005 were assessed. Data were collected on the type and dose of heparin used, duration of exposure to heparin, interval between heparin administration and cancer cell inoculation, and the animal tumour model used. In addition, a distinction was made in the analysis between heparin effects on the primary tumour or on established metastases and effects on the metastatic potential of infused cells.

RESULTS

Heparins seemed to affect the formation of metastasis rather than the growth of primary tumours. Chemically modified heparins with no or limited anticoagulant activity also showed anti-metastatic properties. Possible mechanisms to explain the effects on the process of metastases include inhibition of blood coagulation, inhibition of cancer cell-platelet and -endothelial interactions by selectin inhibition and inhibition of cell invasion and angiogenesis.

CONCLUSION

The anti-cancer activity of heparins depends more on inhibition of metastasis formation than on the effects on primary tumour growth. These effects are probably related to both coagulation and non-coagulation dependent factors. For a definitive proof of the anti-cancer activity of heparins in the clinic, prospective randomized trials especially in patients with early metastatic disease or in the adjuvant setting are urgently needed.

The heparins and cancer: review of clinical trials and biological properties

The association between cancer and thromboembolic disease is a well-known phenomenon and can contribute significantly to the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients. The spectrum of thromboembolic manifestations in cancer patients includes deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, but also intravascular disseminated coagulation and abnormalities in the clotting system in the absence of clinical manifestations. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and particularly low molecular weight heparins (LMWH-s) are widely used for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic manifestations that commonly accompany malignancies. Malignant growth has also been linked to the activity of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans, to neoangiogenesis, to protease activity, to immune function and gene expression. All these factors contribute in the proliferation and dissemination of malignancies. Heparins may play a role in tumour cell growth and in cancer dissemination. The aims of the study are to review the efficiency of heparins in the prevention and treatment of cancer-related thromboembolic complications, and review the biological effects of heparins. Heparins are effective in reducing the frequency of thromboembolic complications in cancer patients. Meta-analyses comparing unfractionated heparins and LMWH-s for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis have shown better outcome with a reduction of major bleeding complications in patients treated with LMWH-s. LMWH have antitumour effects in animal models of malignancy: heparin oligosaccharides containing less than 10 saccharide residues have been found to inhibit the biological activity of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), whereas heparin fragments with less than 18 saccharide residues have been reported to inhibit the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to its receptors on endothelial cells. It has been shown that LMWH, in contrast with UFH, can hinder the binding of growth factors to their high-affinity receptors as a result of its smaller size. In vitro heparin fragments of less than 18 saccharide residues reduce the activity of VEGF, and fragments of less than 10 saccharide residues inhibit the activity of bFGF. Small molecular heparin fractions have also been shown to inhibit VEGF- and bFGF-mediated angiogenesis in vivo, in contrast with UFH. Moreover, heparin may influence malignant cell growth through other different interrelated mechanisms: inhibition of (1) heparin-binding growth factors that drive malignant cell growth; (2) tumour cell heparinases that mediate tumour cell invasion and metastasis; (3) cell surface selectin-mediated tumour cell metastasis and blood coagulation. The above evidence, together with favourable pharmaco-properties and with a reduction in major bleeding complications, suggests an important role for LMWH-s in thromboprophylaxis and in the therapy of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients. There is sufficient experimental data to suggest that heparins may interfere with various aspects of cancer proliferation, angiogenesis, and metastasis formation. Large-scale clinical trials are required to determine the clinical impact of the above activities on the natural history of the disease.

Low-molecular-weight heparins and angiogenesis

The involvement of the vascular system in malignancy encompasses not only angiogenesis, but also systemic hypercoagulability and a pro-thrombotic state, and there is increasing evidence that pathways of blood coagulation and angiogenesis are reciprocally linked. In fact, cancer atients often display hypercoagulability resulting in markedly increased thromboembolism, which requires anti-coagulant treatment using heparins, for example. Clinical trials reveal that treatment with various low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) improves the survival time in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy compared with those receiving unfractionated standard heparin (UFH) or no heparin treatment, as well as in cancer patients receiving LMWH as thrombosis prophylaxis during primary surgery. This anti-tumor effect of the heparins appears to be unrelated to their anti-coagulant activity, but the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. Tumor growth and spread are dependent on angiogenesis and it is noteworthy that the most potent endogenous pro- and anti-angiogenic factors are heparin-binding proteins that may be affected by systemic treatment with heparins. Heparin and other glycosaminoglycans play a role in vascular endothelial cell function, as they are able to modulate the activities of angiogenic growth factors by facilitating the interaction with their receptor and promoting receptor activation. To date, preclinical studies have demonstrated that only LMWH fragments produced by the heparinase digestion of UFH, i.e. tinzaparin, exert anti-angiogenic effects in any type of tissue in vivo. These effects are fragment-mass-specific and angiogenesis-type-specific. Data on the effect of various LMWHs and UFH on endothelial cell capillary tube formation and proliferation in vitro are also presented. We hope that this paper will stimulate and facilitate future research designed to elucidate whether the anti-angiogenic or anti-tumor effects of commercial LMWHs in their own right are agent specific and whether anti-angiogenic properties increase the anti-tumor properties of the LMWHs in the clinic.

Signal amplification in immunohistochemistry at the light microscopic level using biotinylated tyramide and nanogold-silver staining

Signal amplification techniques greatly enhance the sensitivity of immunohistochemical (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH) methods. In particular, catalyzed signal amplification (CSA) using labeled tyramide or Nanogold-silver staining is an important signal amplification tool. We have applied a combination of both techniques, as has been introduced for ISH, for a further increase in sensitivity of an IHC method to detect cathepsin B. This lysosomal proteinase can also be expressed extracellularly, particularly in relation to cancer metastasis. Higher sensitivity of the IHC method was needed because existing methods failed to demonstrate cathepsin B protein where cathepsin B activity was found with a fluorescence enzyme histochemical method. Combined CSA and Nanogold-silver staining provided the sensitivity that was required. Moreover, this signal amplification method enabled the use of a 10-fold lower concentration of primary antibody (1 microg/ml). Nonspecific background staining was low provided that endogenous biotin, avidin, and peroxidase were completely blocked. The method was reproducible when all steps, and particularly the silver enhancement step, were rigidly controlled. The method resulted in localization patterns of cathepsin B protein that were in agreement with those of cathepsin B activity in serial sections of rat liver containing colon cancer metastases. We concluded that combined application of CSA and Nanogold-silver staining provides high sensitivity for immunohistochemical methods and that activity localization by an enzyme histochemical method is a very attractive alternative to IHC localization of an enzyme because it is at least as sensitive, it is rapid and simple, and it provides direct information on the function of an enzyme.