Phase I study with weekly cisplatin-paclitaxel and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with carcinoma of the cervix uteri

A Recent Advancement in Nanotechnology Approaches for the Treatment of Cervical Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of female death, with a mortality rate of over 200,000 per year in developing countries. Despite a decrease in cervical cancer occurrences in developed countries over the last decade, the frequency of the disease in developing nations continues to rise at an alarming rate, particularly when it is linked to the human papillomavirus (HPV). With just a few highly invasive conventional therapies available, there is a clear need for novel treatment options such as nanotechnology-based chemotherapeutic drug delivery.

METHODS

Traditional anticancer therapy is limited by poor drug potency, non-specificity, unwanted side effects, and the development of multiple drug resistance (MDR), leading to a decrease in long-term anticancer therapeutic efficacy. An ideal cancer therapy requires a personalized and specialized medication delivery method capable of eradicating even the last cancer cell responsible for disease recurrence.

RESULTS

Nanotechnology provides effective drug delivery mechanisms, allowing it to serve both therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. Nanotechnology-based formulations are widely used to accurately target the target organ, maintain drug load bioactivity, preferentially accumulate the drug at the target location, and reduce cytotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

The key benefits of this drug delivery are that it improves pharmacological activity, solubility, and bioavailability and reduces toxicity in the target tissue by targeting ligands, allowing for new innovative treatment methods in an area that is desperately required. The goal of this review is to highlight possible research on nanotechnologybased delivery systems for cancer detection and treatment.

Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Paclitaxel and Cisplatin

BACKGROUND/AIM

We retrospectively analyzed the locally advanced adenocarcinoma (AC)/adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the uterine cervix treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy using cisplatin plus paclitaxel (TP-CCRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with stage IB-IVA AC/ASC were treated with whole pelvis external beam radiotherapy. A high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy was delivered once per week at a fractional dose of 6 Gy. For TP-CCRT, the patients received cisplatin and paclitaxel.

RESULTS

A complete response was achieved in 17 patients (77.3%) in the TP-CCRT group and 4 patients (50.0%) in the P-CCRT group. The 5-year OS rate in the TP-CCRT and P-CCRT groups was 74.2% and 25.0% (p=0.0094), the central DFS rate was 58.0% and 12.5% (p=0.0267), and the distant DFS rate was 63.6% and 12.5% (p=0.0042), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TP-CCRT achieves a considerably better disease control for AC of the cervix, leading to a better OS.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Followed by Radical Surgery versus Radiotherapy (with or without Chemotherapy) in Patients with Stage IB2, IIA, or IIB Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

This study was to compare the efficacy and safety between neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery (NACT+RS) and radiotherapy only (RT) or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for treatment of patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB cervical cancer.

Method

The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to screen relevant studies from their inception to October 2018. Clinical data including overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events were extracted. Egger's test was used to evaluate the publication bias, and sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate the robustness of results.

Results

Finally, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two case-control studies consisting of 1,275 patients with stage IB2, IIA, or IIB cervical cancer were included in the current study. Overall, pooled results showed no significant differences in OS ((hazard ratio (HR) = 0.603, 95%CI = 0.350 − 1.038) and DFS (HR = 0.678, 95%CI = 0.242 − 1.904) for patients treated with NACT+RS compared with RT only or CCRT, but the subgroup analysis showed that the OS and DFS were significantly longer in the NACT+RS groups than the RT or CCRT group (OS: HR = 0.431, 95%CI = 0.238 − 0.781, p = 0.006; DFS: HR = 0.300, 95%CI = 0.187 − 0.482, p < 0.001) for the population with median follow-up time of more than 60 months. For adverse events, the incidence of thrombocytopenia in the NACT+RS group was significantly higher than that in the RT only or CCRT group (relative risk (RR) = 3.240, 95% CI 1.575-6.662), while the incidence of diarrhea was significantly lower than that in the RT only or CCRT group (RR = 0.452, 95% CI =0.230-0.890).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the short-term therapeutic effects of the two treatments may be possibly equal for patients with stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer, but the long-term effects for improving OS and DFS may be better using NACT+RS compared with the RT only or CCRT.

High precision radiotherapy including intensity-modulated radiation therapy and pulsed-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer: a retrospective monoinstitutional study

Purpose

To analyse the survival outcomes and toxicity profile of patients treated with pulsed-dose-rate (PDR) brachytherapy (BT) after intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for uterine cervical cancer in a single institution.

Material and methods

Between March 2011 and December 2014, 50 patients with histologically proven stages IB1-IVB cervical cancer were treated with IMRT followed by PDR-BT boost. Radiation treatment consisted of IMRT to pelvic with or without paraaortic lymph nodes to a total dose of 45-50.4 Gy. Weekly concomitant chemotherapy was administered to 45 patients. PDR-BT boost was delivered with a median dose of 30 Gy to the high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV) after a median time of 14 days since IMRT. Acute and late toxicity were evaluated by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) - European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) scoring criteria and Subjective Objective Management Analytic-Late Effects of Normal Tissues (SOMA-LENT) criteria.

Results

Two patients had tumour persistence at 6 months after the end of BT. After a median follow-up of 33 months, 6 distant metastases with or without regional relapse were observed. The 1- and 5-year progression-free survival was 83% (95% CI: 69-91%) and 76% (95% CI: 61-86%), whereas the 3- and 5-year overall survival was 91% (95% CI: 78-97%) and 76% (95% CI: 56-88%), respectively. Urinary and rectal toxicity higher than grade 2 was observed in 6.3% and 17% of patients, respectively. Five patients (10.6%) had grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity requiring colostomy.

Conclusions

Our study confirms that the combination of IMRT and PDR-BT can be considered an effective treatment for cervical cancer, ensuring high local control, despite the high percentage of locally advanced disease.

Long-Term Results of a Phase II Trial of Concomitant Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the long-term results of a 7-week schedule of external beam radiation therapy, high dose rate brachytherapy, and weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 to IVa cervical cancer were treated with 40 mg/m per week of intravenous cisplatin and 50 mg/m per week of intravenous paclitaxel combined with 45 Gy of pelvic external beam radiation therapy and 28 to 30 Gy of high dose rate brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (43.2%) were able to complete the 6 scheduled cycles of chemotherapy. The median number of weekly chemotherapy cycles administered was 5. Thirty-six (16.2%) of 222 cycles of chemotherapy were not given because of toxicity. The mean dose intensity of cisplatin was 29.6 mg/m per week (95% confidence interval, 27.0-32.1); that of paclitaxel was 40.0 mg/m per week (95% confidence interval, 36.9-43.1). Thirty-four patients (91.8%) completed the planned radiation course in less than 7 weeks. Median radiation treatment length was 43 days. After a median follow-up of 6 years, 7 patients (18.9%) experienced severe (RTOG grade 3 or higher) late toxicity. No fatal events were observed. Ten patients have failed, 1 locally and 9 at distant sites. The 14-year locoregional control rate was 96.7%, and the 14-year freedom from systemic failure rate was 64.6%. Fourteen-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 44.8% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates excellent very long-term results and tolerable toxicity although the target weekly dosage of cisplatin and paclitaxel needs to be adjusted in the majority of the patients.

Clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan (CPT-11) and nedaplatin followed by radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with irinotecan (CPT-11) and nedaplatin (NED) followed by radical hysterectomy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (stage Ib2-IIb) were treated with NAC followed by surgery, primary surgery or primary radiotherapy. NAC was usually performed using transuterine arterial chemotherapy (TUAC) or intravenous CPT-11/NED. Survival rates were analysed in the three treatment groups; response rates and adverse events associated with NAC, TUAC and CPT-11/NED were compared, along with previously reported adverse events of chemoradiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients with cervical cancer were recruited. Of these, 70 were treated with NAC followed by surgery (48 with CPT-11/NED, 18 with TUAC and four with other types of chemotherapy), 73 were treated with primary surgery and 22 with primary radiotherapy (including chemoradiotherapy). There were no significant differences in progression-free survival or overall survival rates between the three treatment groups. The response rates for the NAC regimen of CPT-11/NED and TUAC were high (75% and 78%, respectively). The frequency of severe thrombocytopenia was lower in patients receiving CPT-11/NED compared with TUAC, and the incidence of severe anaemia, vomiting and cystitis was lower in patients receiving CPT-11/NED compared with chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of CPT-11/NED as a NAC regimen shows favourable activity, with lower toxicity compared with NAC using TUAC or chemoradiotherapy, for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.

Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer: The JACCRO GY-01 trial

OBJECTIVE

A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to assess the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with weekly cisplatin (CDDP) and paclitaxel (PTX) in patients with locally advanced uterine cervical cancer.

METHODS

Patients with FIGO stage III-IVA uterine cervical cancer without para-aortic lymphadenopathy were enrolled. Patients received definitive radiotherapy (RT) consisting of external beam whole-pelvic RT and high-dose-rate intracavitary brachytherapy. The cumulative linear quadratic equivalent dose was 62-65Gy prescribed at point A. weekly CDDP at 30mg/m(2) and PTX at 50mg/m(2) were administered concurrently with RT for ≥5 courses.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight of the 70 registered patients were eligible. The complete response rate was 76.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.4-86.6%). With a median follow-up of 27months (range, 7.9-33.5), the 2-year cumulative progression-free survival and the 2-year cumulative overall survival rates were 83.8% (95% CI, 75.1-92.6%) and 92.7% (95% CI, 86.4-98.9%), respectively. The pelvic cumulative disease progression-free and the 2-year cumulative distant metastasis rates were 89.6% (95% CI, 82.3-96.9%) and 13.2% (95% CI, 5.2-21.3%), respectively. The 2-year cumulative late complication rates were 25% for all grades, 13.2% for grade 1, 5.9% for grade 2, 2.9% for grade 3, and 2.9% for grade 4.

CONCLUSIONS

For locally advanced cervical cancer, CCRT with weekly CDDP 30mg/m(2) and PTX at 50mg/m(2) demonstrated favorable antitumor activity, and was feasible and safe with respect to the protocol-specified serious adverse reactions and events. Evaluation of this regimen in phase III trials is warranted.

Effects of chemotherapy on patients with recurrent cervical cancer previously treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective multicenter survey in Japan

BACKGROUND

Predictive factors of the efficacy of chemotherapy for Japanese patients with recurrent cervical cancer who have been previously treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) are currently unknown, and hence we aimed to investigate this.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied the prognostic outcomes of patients with recurrent cervical cancer treated with CCRT between 2002 and 2010 at four medical facilities.

RESULTS

A total of 64 patients were included in this study. Forty-two patients received definitive CCRT and 22 patients received postoperative adjuvant CCRT, with 55 receiving platinum-based combination chemotherapy and nine receiving single-agent chemotherapy. The overall response rate (ORR) was 12.5%, with one complete response. The median survival period was 12 months. The ORR and overall survival rate did not differ significantly according to recurrence site, post-CCRT interval, or chemotherapy regimen.

CONCLUSION

None of the factors analyzed in this study were identified as positive predictive factors for the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with recurrent cervical cancer after CCRT. Based on the results of previous studies, in order to improve long-term prognosis in recurrent cases, adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered as a potential treatment option for selected patients, especially as postoperative adjuvant therapy.

Early efficacy of taxotere and cisplatin chemo-radiotherapy for advanced cervical cancer

The aim of this study was to investigate the early outcome of the taxotere and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy to the advanced cervical cancer. Fifty-six cases with cervical cancer (FIGO II b to IVa) were divided randomly into two groups: radiotherapy alone (28 cases) and radiation plus chemotherapy (TP) group. There was no difference of radiotherapy between the two groups. The RT+C cases who received TP regimen during the radiation, and DDP once weekly injection of vain, according to 20 mg/m2 and taxotere once weekly i.v. according to 35 mg/m2.These regimen were given for 4~5 weeks, and some medicine for vomiting was given to the RT+C cases. Two groups were received an oral medicine MA 160 mg every day during the treatment. The early outcome: the complete remission rate was 64.3% and partial remission rate was 35.7% in RT+C. the complete remission rate was 32.1% and partial remission rate was 39.3% in RT. The total response rate and complete remission of RT+C group was higher than that of the RT group. There was significant difference between the two groups. The taxotere and cisplatin chemoradiotherapy can improve the early outcome of the advanced cervical cancer, the adverse effects being endurable.

A phase II randomized trial comparing radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin or weekly paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical cancer

Purpose/Objective

This is a prospective comparison of weekly cisplatin to weekly paclitaxel as concurrent chemotherapy with standard radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Materials/Methods

Between May 2000 and May 2004, 31 women with FIGO stage IB2-IVA cervical cancer or with postsurgical pelvic recurrence were enrolled into this phase II study and randomized to receive on a weekly basis either 40 mg/m² Cisplatin (group I; 16 patients) or 50 mg/m² paclitaxel (group II; 15 patients) concurrently with radiotherapy. Median total dose to point A was 74 Gy (range: 66-92 Gy) for group I and 66 Gy (range: 40-98 Gy) for group II. Median follow-up time was 46 months.

Results

Patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. The mean number of chemotherapy cycles was also comparable with 87% and 80% of patients receiving at least 4 doses in groups I and II, respectively. Seven patients (44%) of group I and 8 patients (53%) of group II developed tumor recurrence. The Median Survival time was not reached for Group I and 53 months for group II. The proportion of patients surviving at 2 and 5 years was 78% and 54% for group I and 73% and 43% for group II respectively.

Conclusions

This small prospective study shows that weekly paclitaxel does not provide any clinical advantage over weekly cisplatin for concurrent chemoradiation for advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

Pharmacotherapy options for locally advanced and advanced cervical cancer

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutic modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be investigated. A recent, randomized, phase III trial has shown for the first time that combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine concurrently with radiation improves parameters of survival over cisplatin alone and establishes a new standard for the management of locally advanced cervical cancer. On the other hand, advanced disease, presenting either as an International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IVB or as persistent or recurrent to primary therapy without local curative options, remains a devastating group of diseases with no options other than palliative chemotherapy. Recent results from the GOG (Gynecologic and Oncologic Group)-204 study demonstrate that cisplatin-doublets with paclitaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine or topotecan only produce small improvements in survival, although with different toxicity patterns; hence, patient-related factors are important when choosing any one of these regimens. The role of targeted therapies both in locally advanced and advanced disease is promising, but still at an investigational stage.

A phase II trial of less than 7 weeks of concomitant cisplatin-paclitaxel chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study was undertaken to determine the tolerability of a 7-week schedule of external beam radiation therapy, high-dose-rate brachytherapy, and weekly cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix.

METHODS

Twenty-nine patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages IB2 to IVa cervical cancer were treated with 40 mg/m per week of intravenous (i.v.) cisplatin and 50 mg/m per week of i.v. paclitaxel combined with 45 Gy of pelvic external beam radiation therapy and 30 Gy of high-dose-rate brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Eleven patients (37.9%) were able to complete the 6 scheduled cycles of chemotherapy. The median number of weekly chemotherapy cycles administered was 5 (range, 2-7). Thirty-five (20.1%) of 174 cycles of chemotherapy were not given because of toxicity. The median dose intensity of cisplatin was 31 mg/m per week (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.2-36.8); that of paclitaxel was 44 mg/m per week (95% CI, 39.9-48.3). Twenty-two patients (78.6%) were able to complete the planned radiation course in less than 7 weeks. Median radiation treatment length was 45 days (95% CI, 43.4-46.6). After a median follow-up of 48 months, 7 patients (24.1%) experienced severe (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3 or higher) late toxicity. No fatal events were observed. Seven patients have failed, 1 locally and 6 at distant sites. The 8-year local/pelvic control rate was 95.7%, and the 8-year freedom from systemic failure rate was 76.1%. Eight-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival were 63.1% and 75.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated unacceptable toxicity of combining the stated doses of concurrent cisplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy with definitive radiotherapy for patients with advanced cervical cancer. Additional phase I/II trials are recommended to clearly establish the recommended phase II dose for these drugs.

Comparison of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes and toxicities between concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil and that with cisplatin plus paclitaxel in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed data from 93 locally advanced cervical carcinoma patients (stage IB to IVA) who had been treated by concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (CF, n=45) vs. cisplatin plus paclitaxel (CP, n=48) as primary therapy. Toxicities and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In the CP group, there were higher frequencies of severe (grade 3 or 4) leukopenia (79.2%, as compared to 11.1% in the CF group), severe neutropenia (77.1%, as compared to 8.9% in the CF group) and severe peripheral neuropathy (12.5%, as compared to 2.2% in the CF group). In the CF group, there were higher frequencies of severe nausea (33.3%, as compared to 14.6% in the CP group) and severe hyponatremia (11.1%, as compared to 0% in the CP group). Five-year DFS of the CF and CP groups was 67.4% and 79.1%, respectively (p=NS). Five year OS of the CF and CP groups was 79.6% and 80.9%, respectively (p=NS).

CONCLUSION

Concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed increased leukopenia, neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy, but less gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea) than that with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. Survival outcome between these two groups was not statistically different in this study. Large prospective randomized controlled studies will be needed to confirm this result.

Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel with pelvic radiation therapy in the primary treatment of cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the feasibility of weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel with radiation therapy (RT) in the primary treatment of cervical cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

Women diagnosed with stage IB-1 to stage IVA untreated primary cervical cancer were eligible. Carboplatin (area under the curve = 2.0) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m2 were administered weekly for 6 weeks with pelvic RT. Brachytherapy was completed after pelvic RT. Acute toxicities and response to treatment were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-two evaluable patients were enrolled. The median duration of follow-up was 23 months. Carboplatin (mean dose 245 mg) and paclitaxel (mean dose 70 mg) were successfully administered in 97% and 90% of planned treatments, respectively. Median time to complete external radiation therapy was 36.6 days (25-57 days). Grade 3/4 hematologic or gastrointestinal toxicity was unusual. The complete response rate 3 months after completion of therapy was 91%. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival is 70% and overall survival is 65%.

CONCLUSION

Weekly carboplatin/paclitaxel and RT is a reasonable treatment regimen for cervical cancer.

Radiosensitizers in cervical cancer. Cisplatin and beyond

Cervical cancer continues to be a significant health burden worldwide. Globally, the majority of cancers are locally advanced at diagnosis; hence, radiation remains the most frequently used therapeutical modality. Currently, the value of adding cisplatin or cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation for treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is strongly supported by randomized studies and meta-analyses. Nevertheless, despite these significant achievements, therapeutic results are far from optimal; thus, novel therapies need to be assayed. A strategy currently being investigated is the use of newer radiosensitizers alone or in combination with platinum compounds. In the present work, we present preclinical information on known and newer cytotoxic agents as radiosensitizers on cervical cancer models, as well as the clinical information emanating from early phase trials that incorporate them to the cervical cancer management. In addition, we present the perspectives on the combined approach of radiation therapy and molecular target-based drugs with proven radiosensitizing capacity.

A Phase II Trial with Cisplatin-Paclitaxel Cytotoxic Treatment and Concurrent External and Endocavitary Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced or Recurrent Cervical Cancer

BACKGROUND

Five randomized studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of adding cisplatin-based chemotherapy to radiation therapy in the treatment of cervical carcinoma. In the present phase II study, we evaluated the response and toxicity of cisplatin-Taxol chemotherapy combined with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma (LACC) and locally recurrent cervical carcinoma (LRCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 2000, this phase II study was initiated with a chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) and Taxol (175 mg/m(2)) every 21 days, for four cycles, concomitant with external radiotherapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy. Pelvic radiotherapy was started 2 weeks after the first chemotherapy cycle, while the first brachytherapy insertion was carried out during the fourth chemotherapy cycle. SCC marker was determined before treatment and after every chemotherapy cycle.

RESULTS

All of the 27 patients treated achieved a complete clinical response. Two patients with LACC experienced distant recurrence 22 and 24 months after complete response, respectively, and 1 patient with LRCC had local progression 6 months after the end of radiotherapy. Although generally tolerable, neutropenia grade 3-4 in 4 patients and anemia grade 3 in 2 patients were observed, and 1 patient experienced grade 2 neurotoxicity; toxicity due to radiotherapy was moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant cisplatin-Taxol chemoradiotherapy seems to be well tolerated, and results, even in this small series, are encouraging.

Proteomic analysis of anti-cancer effects by paclitaxel treatment in cervical cancer cells

OBJECTIVES

Paclitaxel (Taxol), a potent drug of natural origin isolated from the bark of the Pacific yew, is widely used in the treatment of ovarian, lung and breast cancer. At present, there is little information regarding the anti-cancer mechanism of paclitaxel against cervical carcinoma cells. We thus tried to show the anti-cancer effect of paclitaxel on cervical carcinoma cell line carrying HPV by using a proteomic analysis and to investigate the mechanism of actions.

METHODS

We treated paclitaxel to cervical carcinoma cells and then carried out MTT assay to observe the anti-proliferate activity. Using proteomics analysis including two-dimensional (2-DE) gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF-MS, we tried to find the anti-proliferate activity-related proteins. Among them, paclitaxel treatment suppressed the expression of the mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3. Functional proteomic analysis by small interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting was tried to illuminate a role of mitotic checkpoint protein BUB3 in cell cycle progression.

RESULTS

The cytotoxicity effects of paclitaxel were determined in HPV-16 positive CaSki, HPV-18 positive HeLa and HPV-negative C33A cervical carcinoma cell lines. Using efficient proteomics methods including 2-DE/MALDI-TOF-MS, we identified several cellular proteins that are responsive to paclitaxel treatment in HeLa cells. Paclitaxel treatment elevated mainly apoptosis-related, immune response-related and cell cycle check point-related proteins. On the other hand, paclitaxel treatment diminished growth factor/oncogene-related proteins and transcription regulation-related proteins. Paclitaxel showed anti-proliferate activity through the membrane death receptor (DR)-mediated apoptotic pathway involving activation of caspase-8 with a TRAIL-dependent fashion as well as the mitochondrial-mediated pathway involving down-regulation of bcl-2 by cytochrome c release. Furthermore, we found siRNA-induced BUB3 knock down on cell cycle progression blocked by cell cycle arrest after paclitaxel treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The proteome profiling technique provided a broad-base and effective approach for the identification of protein changes induced by paclitaxel and showed anti-proliferate activity through the membrane death receptor-mediated apoptotic pathway, the mitochondrial-mediated pathway. This study shows the power of proteomic profiling with functional analysis using RNAi technology for the discovery of novel molecular targets and a better understanding of the actions of paclitaxel at the molecular level in cervical carcinoma cells.

External beam radiotherapy and high-dose brachytherapy combined with cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation with cisplatin and paclitaxel and high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

19 patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the pelvis +/- paraaortic nodes, HDR brachytherapy, cisplatin at doses of 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 4, and weekly paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1-5 during years 2000-2002. Chemotherapy was administered until leukopenia < or = 2500/mm3, thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3, and/or hemoglobin level <100 g/l occurred. The median follow up was 36 months (range 25-47).

RESULTS

Only four patients were able to tolerate the complete intended course of radiochemotherapy. Chemotherapy was stopped in two patients because of allergic reaction and in one patient because of deep thrombosis. In 12 other cases, chemotherapy was discontinued for hematological toxicity. The 3-year disease free survival was 66%, the 3-year overall survival was 74%.

CONCLUSION

The hematological toxicity was the main factor limiting administration of cisplatin at 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1 and 4 and weekly paclitaxel at 50 mg/m2 in weeks 1-5 concomitantly with extended field radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Pathologic response and toxicity assessment of chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine in cervical cancer: A randomized Phase II study

PURPOSE

To compare gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) with cisplatin (C) concurrent with radiotherapy in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IB2, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma in a preoperative setting. The main endpoints were the pathologic response rate and toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 83 patients were randomized to either C or GC. Treatment consisted of six doses of cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for Arm 1 (C) and six doses of gemcitabine at 125 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin at 40 mg/m(2) every week for or Arm 2 (GC) Both regimens were administered concurrent with 50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 2-Gy fractions for 5 weeks. After chemoradiotherapy, patients underwent radical hysterectomy.

RESULTS

All 83 patients were studied for toxicity and 80 for response. The complete pathologic response rate in the C arm and GC arm was 55% (95% confidence interval, 35.5-73%) and 77.5% (95% confidence interval, 57-90%; p = 0.0201). Among those with a partial response, 7 patients each had high and intermediate-high risk factors for recurrence in their surgical specimens in the C arm vs. 2 and 3 patients, respectively, with these characteristics in the CG arm. The number of weekly doses and the dose intensity of GC were lower than for C. The time to complete external beam radiotherapy also favored the C arm. The CG combination produced greater GI and hematologic toxicity.

CONCLUSION

The radiosensitizing combination of GC achieved a greater pathologic response rate than C in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Phase I clinical trial of weekly paclitaxel, weekly carboplatin, and concurrent radiotherapy for primary cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Standard primary treatment for locally advanced cervix cancer is radiation (RT) with concomitant platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Incomplete local control and the appearance of distant disease herald poor survival and warrant evaluation of new primary strategies. Paclitaxel and carboplatin are active agents in recurrent cervical carcinoma, have potent, synergistic in vitro radiosensitization, and are cytotoxic in weekly schedules. This study was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of weekly paclitaxel/carboplatin chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cervix cancer.

METHODS

Women with primary, previously untreated, squamous cell or adenocarcinoma of the cervix, FIGO stage IB(2) to IVA, negative para-aortic lymph nodes, adequate organ function and performance status were eligible. Pelvic RT (45 Gy over 5 weeks--180 cGy/day, four-field) was followed by two brachytherapy applications (Point A low dose rate (LDR): 90 Gy, high dose rate (HDR): 75 Gy). Concurrent weekly CT was paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2) and carboplatin, starting at AUC 1.5 and escalating in three-patient cohorts by AUC 0.5 (Max AUC 3.5). Dose escalation followed a 4-week observation period for toxicity. A grade III-IV toxicity prompted up to three additional patients per dose level. A second event defined DLT. CT was administered concurrently throughout brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled and treated over four dose levels until DLT was reached. Median age was 44 years (range, 23-70); stages: IB2: 1, IIB: 9, IIIA: 1, IIIB: 4. Median RT treatment time was 61 days (range, 55-79). Fourteen patients received brachytherapy (LDR: 8, HDR: 6), and one received external RT only due to cervical stenosis. The median number of weekly CT cycles was seven (range, 6-7). One CT dose was dropped in one patient for a grade II thrombocytopenia. One grade III ANC was observed at dose level II (AUC 2.0) but not seen in three additional patients. At dose level IV (AUC 3.0), two grade III-IV ANC toxicities were observed in two patients (DLT). Nine patients had grade II anemia. One patient had grade III anemia. Grade III/IV nonhematologic toxicity was rare (1/15 GI-nausea/vomiting, 1/15 pneumonia, 1/15 hypokalemia). The MTD of carboplatin is AUC 2.5 with paclitaxel 50 mg/m(2). Median follow-up is 17 months; three patients have recurred and two have died. The estimated 2-year PFS and OS are 80% and 86%.

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin chemoradiation is feasible and active. The MTD for a phase II trial is 50 mg/m(2) and AUC 2.5, respectively.

In Vivo Measurement of Microtubule Dynamics Using Stable Isotope Labeling with Heavy Water

Microtubules are dynamic polymers with central roles in the mitotic checkpoint, mitotic spindle assembly, and chromosome segregation. Agents that block mitotic progression and cell proliferation by interfering with microtubule dynamics (microtubule-targeted tubulin-polymerizing agents (MTPAs)) are powerful antitumor agents. Effects of MTPAs (e.g. paclitaxel) on microtubule dynamics have not yet been directly demonstrated in intact animals, however. Here we describe a method that measures microtubule dynamics as an exchange of tubulin dimers into microtubules in vivo. The incorporation of deuterium ((2)H(2)) from heavy water ((2)H(2)O) into tubulin dimers and polymers is measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. In cultured human lung and breast cancer cell lines, or in tumors implanted into nude mice, tubulin dimers and polymerized microtubules exhibited nearly identical label incorporation rates, reflecting their rapid exchange. Administration of paclitaxel during 24 h of (2)H(2)O labeling in vivo reduced (2)H labeling in polymers while increasing (2)H in dimers, indicating diminished flux of dimers into polymers (i.e. inhibition of microtubule dynamic equilibrium). In vivo inhibition of microtubule dynamics was dose-dependent and correlated with inhibition of DNA replication, a stable isotopic measure of tumor cell growth. In contrast, microtubule polymers from sciatic nerve of untreated mice were not in dynamic equilibrium with tubulin dimers, and paclitaxel increased label incorporation into polymers. Our results directly demonstrate altered microtubule dynamics as an important action of MTPAs in vivo. This sensitive and quantitative in vivo assay of microtubule dynamics may prove useful for pre-clinical and clinical development of the next generation of MTPAs as anticancer drugs.

The role of chemotherapy in locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer

Cervical cancer is among the major health problems world-wide although advances in screening programs. Surgery and radiotherapy are the treatment modalities of choice for early and locally advanced cervical cancer. However, the role of chemotherapy in this setting has been better investigated in the latest years. To improve loco-regional control in locally advanced disease, authors have tested both neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 1999 NCI clinical announcement, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation is considered the treatment of choice for cervical cancer patients requiring radiation therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is reaching encouraging results in IB bulky-IIA cervical cancer, but further investigation are ongoing in locally advanced cervical setting. The optimal treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer is still undefined and chemotherapy is used with palliation intent. Cisplatin remains the most active cytotoxic agents, although combinations of cisplatin with paclitaxel, topotecan, vinorelbine, have shown encouraging results in phase II and in early phase III studies. This paper reviews the role of chemotherapy in the management of patients with locally advanced, metastatic and recurrent cervical cancer. Studies discussed in this paper were selected trough a search in the med-line database performed in October 2003.