Staging of breast cancer: what standards should be used in research and clinical practice?

Expanded criteria for pretreatment staging CT in breast cancer

Background

There is wide variation in the approach to staging for distant metastatic disease in breast cancer. This study sought to identify factors predictive of distant metastatic disease at presentation to enable appropriate selection of patients for pretreatment CT.

Methods

Data were collected retrospectively for all patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer (screening and symptomatic) over 3 years (2014–2017). Detailed demographic, pathological, biological, and management data were recorded at presentation, and outcome data were recorded after follow-up. Binomial logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with distant metastatic disease at presentation.

Results

A total of 1377 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer were identified, of whom 1025 had complete data; 323 staging CT examinations were performed. Distant metastases were identified at presentation in 47 (4.6 per cent). Some 30 of 47 patients with metastatic disease met established criteria for staging (T4, recurrence, symptoms of possible distant metastases), leaving 17 patients with metastatic disease potentially missed by use of these criteria alone. Multivariable analysis showed that tumour size at least 3 cm combined with sonographically abnormal axillary lymph nodes predicted a high probability of distant metastatic disease at presentation (positive predictive value 18.8 per cent, odds ratio 4.83, P < 0.001). Addition of this criterion increased the positive CT rate to 17.1 per cent.

Conclusion

Selective pretreatment CT staging can be further optimized with the addition of tumour size at least 3 cm with abnormal axillary nodes to established staging criteria.

Unwarranted imaging for distant metastases in patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ and stage I and II breast cancer

Background

In 2012, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) released a Choosing Wisely Top Five list that included a recommendation against ordering advanced imaging tests to screen for metastases among asymptomatic patients with early breast cancer. Our provincial breast cancer staging guideline was subsequently updated. We report on the use of unwarranted bone scanning (BS), computed tomography (CT), nonbreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) among women diagnosed with stage 0–II breast cancer in Alberta in 2011–2015.

Methods

The cohort was retrospectively ascertained from the Alberta Cancer Registry. We used additional provincial data sources to obtain information about diagnostic imaging tests completed from biopsy to surgical date plus 4 months. The reason for each BS, CT, MRI and PET was abstracted. We calculated the frequency of advanced imaging tests completed for routine metastatic screening.

Results

Of 10 142 patients included, 2887 (28.5%) had at least 1 advanced imaging test completed for routine metastatic screening. Of these 2887 patients, 438 (15.2%) had a follow-up BS, CT, MRI or PET, and 28 patients (1.0%) had a nonbreast imageguided biopsy. Use of routine advanced imaging tests did not change clearly over time.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate persistent use of advanced imaging tests for routine metastatic screening among patients with stage 0–II breast cancer despite the release of the ASCO Choosing Wisely recommendations and the update of our provincial breast cancer staging guideline. Investigation of strategies for guideline translation to improve upon value-based care of patients with early breast cancer is warranted.

Population-based Analysis of Treatment and Survival in Women Presenting With Brain Metastasis at Initial Breast Cancer Diagnosis

PURPOSE

Brain metastasis at initial breast cancer diagnosis is rare. This study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics of these patients and identify prognostic and treatment factors associated with improved survival.

METHODS

Subjects were 35 women referred from 1996 to 2005 with newly diagnosed breast cancer with synchronous brain metastasis. Overall survival (OS) and brain progression-free survival were examined using Kaplan-Meier methods and compared between subgroups with different clinicopathologic and treatment characteristics using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

Median age was 65 years. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone was used in 25 patients, surgical resection and postoperative WBRT in 5 patients, and no or unknown treatment in 5 patients. Patients who underwent cranial resection were more likely to have solitary brain metastasis (P=0.003) and no visceral involvement (P=0.006). Overall, median OS was 6.8 months and median brain progression-free survival was 6.5 months (range, 0.7 to 54 mo). Median OS were 15 months with surgery and postoperative WBRT, 5 months with WBRT alone, and 3 months with no brain treatment. Longer OS was observed with age below 65 years versus 65 years and above (11 vs. 5 mo, P=0.046), 0 to 1 versus ≥2 sites of extracranial metastasis (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.047), and diagnosis from 2001 to 2005 versus 1996 to 2000 (10 vs. 3 mo, P=0.018). A trend toward improved OS was observed in patients with no visceral involvement (11 vs. 4 mo, P=0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

In this unique cohort presenting with breast cancer and synchronous brain metastasis, longer survival were observed with young age, limited extracranial metastasis, and no visceral disease. These characteristics may be used to select candidates for more aggressive treatment.

Value analysis of postoperative staging imaging for asymptomatic, early-stage breast cancer: implications of clinical variation on utility and cost

BACKGROUND

Routine staging imaging for early-stage breast cancer is not recommended. Despite this, there is clinical practice variation with imaging studies obtained for asymptomatic patients with a positive sentinel node (SN+). We characterize the utility, cost, and clinical implications of imaging studies obtained in asymptomatic SN+ patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of asymptomatic, clinically node-negative patients who were found to have a positive sentinel node after surgery. The type of imaging, subsequent tests/interventions, frequency of additional malignancy detected, and costs were recorded.

RESULTS

From April 2009 to April 2013, a total of 50 of 113 (44%) asymptomatic patients underwent staging imaging for a positive sentinel node; 11 (22%) patients had at least 1 subsequent imaging study or diagnostic intervention. No instance of metastatic breast cancer was identified, with a total cost of imaging calculated at $116,905.

CONCLUSIONS

Staging imaging for asymptomatic SN+ breast cancer demonstrates clinical variation. These tests were associated with low utility, increased costs, and frequent false positives leading to subsequent testing/intervention. Evidence-based standardization may help increase quality by decreasing unnecessary variation and cost.

Imaging for metastatic disease in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: are doctor's perceptions in keeping with the guidelines?

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Despite multiple guidelines advocating against routine radiological evaluation for metastases in women with early stage breast cancer, imaging is still frequently overused. The objective of this study was to assess doctor's views on imaging guidelines, and an attempt to establish why personal and local clinical practice patterns regarding imaging may differ from current guidelines.

METHODS

Canadian doctors who treat breast cancer were invited by email to complete an online survey developed by members of the research team.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 173 physicians (26% response rate). Most (82%) indicated awareness of at least one published imaging guideline. Sixty per cent indicated that they had read the recommendations of the 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology 'Top 5' list for choosing wisely in oncology imaging and, of those, 81% agreed with it. However, most indicated that this recommendation has not influenced them to order less imaging. Over 95% of doctors identified suspicious history, physical examination findings and inflammatory breast cancer as important factors for performing imaging. The majority did not feel that patient demand, fear of litigation or ease of access to imaging influenced their ordering for imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of breast cancer doctors are aware of and generally agree that guidelines pertaining to staging imaging for early breast cancer are reflective of evidence. Despite this, adherence is variable and factors such as local practice patterns and disease biology may play a role. Alternative strategies, beyond simply publishing recommendations, are therefore required if there is to be a sustained change in doctor behaviour.

Are Physicians Choosing Wisely When Imaging for Distant Metastases in Women With Operable Breast Cancer?

PURPOSE

In 2012, the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) published its inaugural Top Five recommendations for "choosing wisely" in oncology. One recommendation was to avoid imaging for metastatic disease in asymptomatic patients with early-stage breast cancer. We assessed whether local practice is in keeping with provincial practice guidelines and whether publication of the ASCO recommendations had any significant impact on this.

METHODS

A retrospective review of staging imaging for distant metastases was performed in patients with primary operable (early-stage) breast cancer seen at a large Canadian academic cancer center.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patient medical records were reviewed: 100 patients from 2011 (pre-ASCO Top Five), and 100 after September 2012 (post-ASCO Top Five). Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were similar in both groups. Overall, 169 patients (84.5%) underwent at least one imaging test (mean, 3.6 tests per imaged patient); 154 patients (77.0%) underwent imaging that was not in keeping with the spirit of the local guideline recommendations. The frequency of imaging did not change after publication of the ASCO recommendations. Furthermore, imaging to clarify indeterminate initial imaging was required in 51 (30.2%) of 169 patients. None of the confirmatory imaging results ultimately revealed metastatic disease.

CONCLUSION

Despite the presence of local imaging guidelines, patients with early-stage breast cancer still undergo imaging for distant metastases. There was no reduction in imaging after publication of the ASCO Top Five recommendations. Broader knowledge translation strategies beyond publication are needed if recommendations are to be implemented into routine clinical practice.

Patient perceptions and expectations regarding imaging for metastatic disease in early stage breast cancer

Purpose

The probability of detecting radiologically evident metastatic disease in asymptomatic women with newly diagnosed operable breast cancer is low. Despite the recommendations of most practice guidelines imaging is still frequently performed. Relatively little is known about what patients believe is important when it comes to radiologic staging.

Methods

Patients with early stage breast cancer who had completed their definitive breast surgery were surveyed about their personal experiences, perceptions, and expectations on the issue of perioperative imaging for distant metastatic disease.

Results

Over a 3 month period, 245 women with primary operable breast cancer completed the questionnaire (87.0% response rate) and 80.8% indicated having had at least one imaging test for distant metastatic disease. These were either of the thorax (72.2%), abdomen (55.9%) or skeleton (65.3%) with a total of 701 imaging tests (average of 3.5 tests per patient imaged) performed. Overall, 57.1% indicated that they would want imaging done if the chance of detecting metastases was ≤10%. Although 80.0% of patients indicated that, “doing whatever their doctor recommended” was important to them, 70.4% also noted that they would be uncomfortable if their physician did not order imaging, even if this was in keeping with practice guidelines.

Conclusions

Most patients with early stage breast cancer recall having imaging tests for distant metastases. Given the choice, most would prefer having imaging performed, even if this is not in line with current guidelines. If patient expectations are, in part, driving excessive imaging, new strategies addressing this are required.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-3-176) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

WITHDRAWN: CT staging in breast cancer: Can we select patients requiring staging with CT?

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Evaluation of the evidence on staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic distant metastases in newly diagnosed breast cancer

While guidelines recommend against routine use of staging imaging to detect asymptomatic distant metastases (DM) in newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC), modern imaging technologies may have improved detection capability and may have a role in some cases. We performed a systematic review of studies (1995-2011) evaluating the prevalence of DM and the accuracy of staging imaging for detection of asymptomatic DM. Twenty-two studies reporting on 14,824 BC subjects (median age 53 years) undergoing staging imaging were eligible. Median prevalence of DM was 7.0% (range 1.2-48.8%); prevalence increased with increasing BC stage. Conventional imaging studies had lower DM prevalence than studies of PET(PET/CT). Imaging median sensitivity/specificity respectively were: combined conventional imaging 78.0%/91.4%; bone scintigraphy 98.0%/93.5%; chest X-ray 100%/97.9%; liver ultrasound 100%/96.7%; CT chest/abdomen 100%/93.1%; FDG-PET 100.0%/96.5%; FDG-PET/CT 100%/98.1%. Low prevalence of DM was seen in Stage I-II BC with much higher prevalence in more advanced disease. Accuracy of PET modalities was very high however the high proportion of detected asymptomatic DM partly reflects selection bias.

Is knowledge translation adequate? A quality assurance study of staging investigations in early stage breast cancer patients

After primary surgery, patients diagnosed with early stage breast cancer undergo radiological investigations based on pathologic stage of disease to rule out distant metastases. Published guidelines can aid clinicians in determining which tests are appropriate based on stage of disease. We wished to assess the consistency of radiological staging in an academic community oncology setting with standard guidelines and to determine the overall impact of non-adherence to these guidelines. A retrospective cohort study was conducted for new breast cancer patients seen at a single institution between January 2009 and April 2010. Patients were included if initial diagnosis and primary surgery was at this institution. Pathologic stage and radiological tests completed were recorded. A literature review was performed and the results were compared with those from this study to determine overall adherence rates. Subsequently, a cost analysis was performed to determine the financial impact at this centre. 231 patients met eligibility criteria for inclusion in this study. A large proportion of patients were over-staged with 129 patients (55%) undergoing unnecessary investigations according to guidelines. Specifically, 59% of stage I patients and 58% of stage II patients were over-investigated. Distant metastases at the time of diagnosis were found in three patients, all of whom had stage III disease (1.3%). The literature reviewed revealed similar non-adherence rates in other centres. The estimated cost of such non-adherence is in the range of $78 (CDN) per new early stage breast cancer patient seen at this centre. This oncology centre has a low adherence to practice guidelines for staging investigations in breast cancer patients, with 55% of patients undergoing unnecessary tests. Very few patients had metastases at diagnosis, and all had pathological stage III disease. Efforts may need to focus on improving knowledge translation across clinical oncology settings to increase guideline adherence.

Incidence and prognostic factors of Japanese breast cancer patients with bone metastasis

BACKGROUND

Few previous studies have analyzed the incidence of bone metastases in a defined population of Japanese breast cancer patients and their prognosis after chemotherapy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study. We investigated 695 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer. The strategy of adjuvant therapy was as follows. Patients with both estrogen receptors (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PgRs) had endocrine therapy as initial adjuvant therapy (n = 239). Patients with neither ERs nor PgRs had chemotherapy. When metastasis to other organs, including bone, was identified, patients received chemotherapy. The survival rates after surgery and after the onset of bone metastasis, as well as the incidence of bone metastasis, were calculated. We also evaluated the prognostic and predictive factors.

RESULTS

Bone metastases developed in 148 of 695 patients. All 148 received chemotherapy, and 121 of them developed spinal metastases. The 5-year survival rate after bone metastases was 26.1%. Prognostic factors for bone metastases were visceral metastases and PgR status. Cord compression was observed in 17 of the 148 patients, with the thoracic spine being the most common. The 1-year survival rate for patients with bone metastases who received chemotherapy was 66.3%, whereas that of patients with paralysis after spinal metastases was 17.6%. Within 6 months of the development of spinal cord compression, 70.6% of the patients died.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported the incidence and prognostic factors for a defined population of Japanese breast cancer patients with bone and spinal metastases. Our results suggest that the expected survival time for patients with paralysis who received adequate endocrine therapy or chemotherapy is generally poor. However, to detect a predictive factor of long survival after paralysis and establish the indications for surgery, a comparative study among large groups of patients with paralysis and with different backgrounds is necessary.

The clinical use of staging bone scan in patients with breast carcinoma: reevaluation by the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system

BACKGROUND

Using the new 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, the authors evaluated the usefulness of the staging bone scan in patients with primary breast carcinoma.

METHODS

The authors examined 1939 patients with primary breast carcinoma for staging bone scan who were treated at a single institution. Pathologic stage was assigned retrospectively according to the 1988 and the 2003 AJCC staging systems.

RESULTS

Bone metastasis rates were 0.7% (4 of 586) for patients with Stage I disease, 0.7% (5 of 699) for patients with Stage IIA disease, 2.1% (10 of 479) for patients with Stage IIB disease, 4.5% (7 of 154) for patients with Stage IIIA disease, and 10.5% (2 of 19) for patients with Stage IIIB disease according to the 1988 AJCC staging system. The authors found a significant difference in the bone metastasis rate between patients with Stages IIA and IIB disease in the 1988 staging system (P = 0.039). Reevaluating the patients by the 2003 system resulted in significant upstaging, especially for patients with Stage II/III disease. According to the 2003 staging system, bone metastasis rates were 0.7% (4 of 586) for patients with Stage I disease, 0.6% (4 of 648) for patients with Stage IIA disease, 0.6% (2 of 310) for patients with Stage IIB disease, 4.0% (9 of 225) for patients with Stage IIIA disease, 16.7% (2 of 12) for patients with Stage IIIB disease, and 4.4% (7 of 158) for patients with Stage IIIC disease. It was noteworthy that there was a significant difference between Stages IIB and IIIA in the 2003 staging system (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Stage reclassification using the new AJCC staging system resulted in upstaging of high-risk patients, as well as a significant decrease in the bone metastasis rate in patients with Stage IIB breast carcinoma. Considering the cost-effectiveness of staging bone scan, the data suggested that it was of little value for patients with Stage I and II breast carcinoma, but was highly recommended for patients with worse than Stage III disease by the new 2003 staging system.

Predictors of a positive baseline bone scan in breast cancer

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the predictors of a positive bone scan in female patients with breast carcinoma. The participants were 126 females with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma and a baseline bone scan. Patients who had started treatment before their bone scan were excluded. Bone scans were assessed as "no metastases" or "definite skeletal metastases" without knowledge of the patient's predictor variables. Those with "possible metastases" were correlated with other available imaging and clinical information, and recategorized as "no metastases" or "definite skeletal metastases". Results were compared with predictor variables. Significant predictors were increasing age, a higher histopathological grading and positive progesterone receptor status following a forward-stepwise logistic regression analysis. Axillary nodal status, tumour size and oestrogen receptor status did not correlate with a positive bone scan. Not every patient needs a staging bone scan. This study is important because it predicts the need for baseline scintigraphy for specific patients in whom skeletal metastases are more likely to be present or to develop. The findings are particularly valuable in times of worldwide resource scarcity and evolving surgical practice.

Perioperative Screening for Metastatic Disease is not Indicated in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer and no Clinical Signs of Tumor Spread

BACKGROUND

Is a perioperative metastatic screening program indicated in patients presenting with primary operable breast cancer and no signs of distant metastases?

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The impact of staging results (chest X-ray, bone scanning, liver ultrasound) for prognosis, treatment, quality of life and costs was retrospectively analyzed in 1076 patients with an operable breast cancer and no clinical signs of metastases.

RESULTS

Staging examinations revealed 30 (2.8%) distant metastases, 130 (12.1%) suspect findings and excluded metastases in 916 (85.1%) patients. Further diagnostic procedures confirmed distant metastases in 7 (5.4%) and excluded them in 123 (94.6%) out of 130 patients with suspect findings. Distant metastases were detected more frequently with increasing pathological tumor size (pT < or = 2.0 cm: 1.6%, pT 2.1-5.0 cm: 3.0%, respectively pT > 5.0 cm: 15.1%; p < 0.001) and increasing number of involved axillary lymph nodes (pN0: 1.9%, pN1-3+: 1.8%, pN4-9+: 4.0%, pN > or = 10+: 18.7%; p < 0.001). Due to false positive findings 123 (11.4%) patients had to live for a significant period of time with the psychological distress of suspected metastatic disease. The abandonment of a perioperative screening in 1076 patients saves costs of at least Euros 259,367.68.

CONCLUSIONS

In breast cancer patients without clinical signs of tumor spread perioperative screening for metastases is not warranted because of low frequency of metastases, false positive findings, missing therapeutic consequences and high costs.

Staging of breast cancer: new recommended standard procedure

BACKGROUND

Staging procedures used to detect metastatic breast cancer at the time of diagnosis are bone scan (BS), chest X-ray (CXR), liver ultrasonography (LUS) and laboratory parameters (LP). These procedures are expensive and not all patients need them. We aimed to identify groups of patients with different risks for metastatic disease.

METHODS

We reviewed data from 1,218 consecutive cases of breast cancer. Pathological and biological parameters and instrumental procedures performed at the time of diagnosis and during 6 months of follow-up were recorded. True positive and negative, false positive and negative cases were evaluated. All cases were grouped on the basis of tumour size, nodal involvement, biological characteristics, menopausal status and age.

RESULTS

We observed 46 (3.8%) true positive cases with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Documentation relating to BS, CXR and LUS was available for 1,193, 1,206 and 1,206 patients, respectively, with 37 (3.1%), 8 (0.7%) and 10 (0.8%) true positive tests. Logistic regression analysis showed significant odds ratio estimates for pT status and nodal status, thus highlighting the role of these morphological data. These findings suggest that breast cancer patients can be divided into two subgroups: first group pT1-3N0-1. with < or = 3 involved nodes, and second group pT1-3N1 with > or = 4 involved nodes, pT4 and pN2 (metastases detection rate 1.46 and 10.68%, respectively). In the former group the appropriate procedures of staging would only be laboratory parameters, whereas in the latter group BS, CXR, LUS, LP and tumour markers CEA and CA 15.3 would.be necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard staging procedures to detect metastatic disease at breast cancer diagnosis require modification. On the basis of the literature data and our findings, the full staging procedure is appropriate in the second group of patients.

Cost-effectiveness of staging computed tomography of the chest in patients with T2 soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Published practice guidelines recommend routine chest computed tomography (CT) scanning as part of the staging evaluation for patients with T2 soft tissue sarcomas (STS), although there is no direct evidence to support this practice. The objective of this study was to determine the yield and cost-effectiveness of routine versus selective chest CT scanning for the staging of patients with T2 STS and to identify any subgroups for whom a more selective approach to chest CT scanning could be considered.

METHODS

Six hundred consecutive patients with primary, nonthoracic, T2 (> 5 cm) STS underwent both chest X-ray (CXR) and chest CT scanning to evaluate the presence of pulmonary metastatic disease (M1). The authors constructed a decision tree that modeled the outcomes of diagnostic testing for two hypothetical diagnostic strategies: 1) routine chest CT (rCT) or 2) CXR and selective chest CT (sCT). The yield and cost of each strategy were determined; the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the cost per additional patient with pulmonary metastases identified by rCT versus sCT.

RESULTS

The yield of rCT was higher than that of sCT (M1 disease identified in 19.2% vs. 16.0% of patients, respectively), but rCT was more costly ($1301 vs. $418 per patient, respectively). The ICER of rCT compared with sCT was $27,594 per patient identified with pulmonary metastasis. The expected yields, costs, and ICERs of the diagnostic strategies varied across patient subgroups based on grade, anatomic site, and tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with T2 STS, rCT was most cost-effective in patients with high-grade lesions or extremity lesions. The findings of this study do not support the routine use of chest CT scanning in all patients with T2 STS.

Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver after intraconazole treatment

A 38-year-old woman developed focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver after she had received a 4-month treatment with intraconazole 200 mg/d for a fungal infection of her fingernails. Because the patient underwent yearly liver ultrasound examinations because of the removal of a breast carcinoma, when the tumor was discovered incidentally, it was clear that it had developed within the past year after she had begun receiving intraconazole. Although various chemical agents and drugs have been considered as possible etiologic factors in the development of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver, cases occurring after intraconazole therapy have not been reported before. Apart from the theoretical considerations with regard to the pathogenesis of nodular hyperplasia of the liver, this case could gain practical importance, as it shows a new adverse effect of a drug that has been used in more than 34 million patients over the past 10 years. Furthermore, this case should draw attention to the possibility of drug-induced benign hepatic tumors, as they may mimic malignant and metastatic disorders, which might be especially alarming in patients undergoing routine examinations after removal of malignant tumors, such as our patient.