Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low-molecular-weight heparins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in renal failure

Utilisation of compounds from venoms in drug discovery

Difficult drug targets are becoming the normal course of business in drug discovery, sometimes due to large interacting surfaces or only small differences in selectivity regions. For these, a different approach is merited: compounds lying somewhere between the small molecule and the large antibody in terms of many properties including stability, biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. Venoms have evolved over millions of years to be complex mixtures of stable molecules derived from other somatic molecules, the stability comes from the pressure to be ready for delivery at a moment's notice. Snakes, spiders, scorpions, jellyfish, wasps, fish and even mammals have evolved independent venom systems with complex mixtures in their chemical arsenal. These venom-derived molecules have been proven to be useful tools, such as for the development of antihypotensive angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and have also made successful drugs such as Byetta® (Exenatide), Integrilin® (Eptifibatide) and Echistatin. Only a small percentage of the available chemical space from venoms has been investigated so far and this is growing. In a new era of biological therapeutics, venom peptides present opportunities for larger target engagement surface with greater stability than antibodies or human peptides. There are challenges for oral absorption and target engagement, but there are venom structures that overcome these and thus provide substrate for engineering novel molecules that combine all desired properties. Venom researchers are characterising new venoms, species, and functions all the time, these provide great substrate for solving the challenges presented by today's difficult targets.

Pharmacokinetics of Toxin-Derived Peptide Drugs

Toxins and venoms produced by different organisms contain peptides that have evolved to have highly selective and potent pharmacological effects on specific targets for protection and predation. Several toxin-derived peptides have become drugs and are used for the management of diabetes, hypertension, chronic pain, and other medical conditions. Despite the similarity in their composition (amino acids as the building blocks), toxin-derived peptide drugs have very profound differences in their structure and conformation, in their physicochemical properties (that affect solubility, stability, etc.), and subsequently in their pharmacokinetics (the processes of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination following their administration to patients). This review summarizes and critically analyzes the pharmacokinetic properties of toxin-derived peptide drugs: (1) the relationship between the chemical structure, physicochemical properties, and the pharmacokinetics of the specific drugs, (2) the major pharmacokinetic properties and parameters of these drugs, and (3) the major pharmacokinetic variability factors of the individual drugs. The structural properties of toxin-derived peptides affect their pharmacokinetics and pose some limitations on their clinical use. These properties should be taken into account during the development of new toxin-derived peptide drugs, and for the efficient and safe use of the clinically approved drugs from this group in the individual patients.

Monitoring Low Molecular Weight Heparins with antiXa Activity: House of Cards or Firm Foundation?

This feature examines the impact of pharmacologic interventions on the treatment of the critically ill patient — an area of health care that has become increasingly complex. It will review recent advances (including evolving and controversial data) in drug therapy for adult ICU patients and assess these new modalities in terms of clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes.

A systematic review on the accumulation of prophylactic dosages of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in patients with renal insufficiency

PURPOSE

Although therapeutic dosages of most low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are known to accumulate in patients with renal insufficiency, for the lower prophylactic dosages this has not been clearly proven. Nevertheless, dose reduction is often recommended. We conducted a systematic review to investigate whether prophylactic dosages of LMWH accumulate in renal insufficient patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted on 17 February 2015 using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed publisher, and Google scholar. The syntax emphasized for LMWHs, impaired renal function, and pharmacokinetics. The search yielded 674 publications. After exclusion by reading the titles, abstracts, and if necessary the full paper, 11 publications remained.

RESULTS

For dalteparin and tinzaparin, no accumulation was observed. Enoxaparin, on the other hand, did lead to accumulation in patients with renal insufficiency, although not in patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Bemiparin and certoparin also did show accumulation. No data were available for nadroparin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review, we show that prophylactic dosages of tinzaparin and dalteparin are likely to be safe in patients with renal insufficiency and do not need dose reduction based on the absence of accumulation. However, prophylactic dosages of enoxaparin, bemiparin, and certoparin did show accumulation in patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) below 30 ml/min, and therefore, dose reduction is required. The differences in occurrence of accumulation seem to depend on the mean molecular weight of LMWHs.

[Clinical pharmacology of current antiplatelet drugs]

Dual antiplatelet therapy with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and an inhibitor of the P2Y12 adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor is the standard treatment for patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing elective coronary interventions according to the current guidelines published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). New generation P2Y12 inhibitors, such as prasugrel and ticagrelor exert stronger and more consistent inhibition of the P2Y12 receptor. In clinical studies enrolling patients with ACS these drugs decreased the incidence of ischemic events compared to the standard therapy with clopidogrel and ASA; however, this beneficial effect was associated with an increase in bleeding events. Alternative therapeutic approaches via addition of drugs with different modes of action showed an overall reduction of ischemic events but also failed to uncouple this beneficial effect from an increased bleeding risk.

Updates in antiplatelet agents used in cardiovascular diseases

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone in coronary artery disease management. However, patients with acute coronary syndrome still remain at risk of recurrent cardiovascular events despite the advance of medical therapy.

OBJECTIVE

This article provides a review of antiplatelet agents used in cardiovascular diseases and focus on updates in the past 5 years.

METHOD

Peer-reviewed clinical trials and relevant treatment guidelines were identified from MEDLINE and Current Content database (from 1966 to April 15, 2013) using search terms aspirin, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, antiplatelet agents, coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndrome, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Citations from the available articles were also reviewed for additional references.

RESULTS

In unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) demonstrated a reduction in death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal MI, or stroke (relative risk 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-0.90). In ST-segment elevation MI, dual antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of occluded infarct-related artery/death or recurrent MI (95% CI, 24%-47%). Newer agents such as prasugrel, when compared to clopidogrel, reduced death from vascular causes, MI, or stroke in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; hazard ratio [HR], 0.81; 95% CI 0.73-0.90) but not in those receiving medical management only. When compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor reduces death from vascular causes, MI, or stroke (HR: 0.84; 95% CI, 0.77-0.92) in patients undergoing PCI or receiving medical management only. Both the agents, however, increase the risk of bleeding in certain patient population.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last 5 years, newer antiplatelet agents, including prasugrel and ticagrelor, have been demonstrated to reduce recurrent cardiovascular events compared to standard therapy and, however, also caused increase bleeding in selected patient populations. Newer agents including shorter acting P2Y12 inhibitor or antiplatelets that target other receptors are being evaluated to improve/maintain therapeutic efficacy yet minimize the risk of bleeding.

Doxorubicin-induced vascular toxicity--targeting potential pathways may reduce procoagulant activity

INTRODUCTION

Previous study in mice using real-time intravital imaging revealed an acute deleterious effect of doxorubicin (DXR) on the gonadal vasculature, as a prototype of an end-organ, manifested by a reduction in blood flow and disintegration of the vessel wall. We hypothesized that this pattern may represent the formation of microthrombi. We aimed to further characterize the effect of DXR on platelets' activity and interaction with endothelial cells (EC) and to examine potential protectants to reduce DXR acute effect on the blood flow.

METHODS

The effect of DXR on platelet adhesion and aggregation were studied in vitro. For in vivo studies, mice were injected with either low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; Enoxaparin) or with eptifibatide (Integrilin(©)) prior to DXR treatment. Testicular arterial blood flow was examined in real-time by pulse wave Doppler ultrasound.

RESULTS

Platelet treatment with DXR did not affect platelet adhesion to a thrombogenic surface but significantly decreased ADP-induced platelet aggregation by up to 40% (p<0.001). However, there was a significant increase in GPIIbIIIa-mediated platelet adhesion to DXR-exposed endothelial cells (EC; 5.7-fold; p<0.001) reflecting the toxic effect of DXR on EC. The testicular arterial blood flow was preserved in mice pre-treated with LMWH or eptifibatide prior to DXR (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

DXR-induced acute vascular toxicity may involve increased platelet-EC adhesion leading to EC-bound microthrombi formation resulting in compromised blood flow. Anti-platelet/anti-coagulant agents are effective in reducing the detrimental effect of DXR on the vasculature and thus may serve as potential protectants to lessen this critical toxicity.

Antiplatelet drugs: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

The article describes the mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, dipyridamole, cilostazol, the thienopyridines, and the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are discussed along with a mechanistic overview of results of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations but highlights important practical aspects of antiplatelet therapy, including optimal dosing, the variable balance between benefits and risks when antiplatelet therapies are used alone or in combination with other antiplatelet drugs in different clinical settings, and the implications of persistently high platelet reactivity despite such treatment.

Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article about currently available antiplatelet drugs is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, reversible cyclooxygenase inhibitors, thienopyridines, and integrin alphaIIbbeta3 receptor antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are thoroughly discussed, with a mechanistic overview of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations; however, it does highlight important practical aspects related to antiplatelet therapy, including the optimal dose of aspirin, the variable balance of benefits and hazards in different clinical settings, and the issue of interindividual variability in response to antiplatelet drugs.

Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin to Bridge Therapy in Obese Patients and in Patients with Renal Dysfunction

OBJECTIVE

To recommend strategies to bridge therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in obese patients and in patients with renal dysfunction.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search was performed of the literature from January 1966-November 2005. Published material dealing with bridging of anticoagulation therapy or short-term use of LMWH therapy in patients with renal dysfunction or obesity was reviewed. The manufacturers of enoxaparin, dalteparin, and tinzaparin were contacted for the references used to determine dosing recommendations.

RESULTS

Although LMWH has been commonly used to bridge therapy, our search revealed no trials that specifically examined LMWH bridge therapy in obese patients or in patients with renal dysfunction. However, nine trials using LMWH in obese patients and 14 trials using LMWH in patients with renal dysfunction were identified. When compared with normal-weight individuals, obese patients receiving enoxaparin and dalteparin based on total body weight did not demonstrate higher hemorrhage rates or antifactor Xa levels. Subtherapeutic antifactor Xa levels were more common with once-daily dosing of enoxaparin than with dosing every 12 hours. Enoxaparin accumulates in patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 ml/minute or less; in this population, enoxaparin dosage adjustments have been attempted. Tinzaparin does not accumulate in patients with a creatinine clearance of 20 ml/minute or greater after at least 10 days of dosing.

CONCLUSION

Obese patients, weighing 90-150 kg, receiving LMWH for bridge therapy should receive dosages based on total body weight. Unfractionated heparin is recommended in patients weighing more than 150 kg; however, if LMWH is used, antifactor Xa levels should be monitored. Bridging with enoxaparin should be limited to patients with a creatinine clearance greater than 30 ml/minute. The use of enoxaparin 1 mg/kg once/day for patients with a creatinine clearance of 30 ml/minute or less is not recommended for anticoagulation bridge therapy. Tinzaparin may be considered for cross-coverage of high-risk patients with recent or recurrent venous thromboembolism who have a creatinine clearance of at least 20 ml/minute.

Life-Threatening Hemorrhage After Dalteparin Therapy in a Patient with Impaired Renal Function

Dalteparin and other low-molecular-weight heparins are frequently used for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis and for other indications. Unlike unfractionated heparin (UFH), dalteparin is mainly cleared through the kidney; therefore, it can accumulate in patients with impaired renal function, increasing the risk of hemorrhage. An 84-year-old woman with chronic renal failure was hospitalized because of stenosis of a femorofibular bypass in her right leg. Peripheral transluminal angioplasty was performed successfully. Later the same day, Doppler sonography revealed deep vein thrombosis of the left lower leg. Treatment with dalteparin was started. The patient was discharged home 3 days later, with dalteparin to be continued at home. One day later, the patient was rehospitalized because of a pronounced hematoma on her flank. Her hemoglobin level had dropped to 5.5 g/dl. Treatment with dalteparin was stopped, and protamine 2500 U and two transfusions of packed red blood cells were administered. Treatment with UFH and oral anticoagulants were started because of a persistent risk for venous thrombosis. Thereafter, the patient's hemoglobin level remained stable, and no further bleeding episodes occurred. As long as systematic studies of the efficacy and safety of dalteparin in patients with severe renal impairment are lacking, dalteparin should be avoided or used only with close monitoring of antifactor Xa activity in these patients. As an alternative, UFH can be used because monitoring of UFH is well established and easier than it is with dalteparin. Renal impairment does not notably influence the short elimination half-life of UFH, which unlike that of dalteparin or other low-molecular-weight heparins allows for rapid dosage adjustments to prevent hemorrhage.

The relation of renal function to ischemic and bleeding outcomes with 2 different glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors: the do Tirofiban and ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcome (TARGET) trial

BACKGROUND

Renal function significantly impacts morbidity and mortality after a percutaneous coronary intervention. Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce ischemic complications during percutaneous coronary intervention; little is known of whether their safety and efficacy are influenced by renal function. In particular, whether outcome differences exist between agents that are renally excreted (tirofiban) or not (abciximab) in patients with mild renal impairment is not known.

METHODS

The TARGET trial randomized 4623 patients to tirofiban or abciximab. In this analysis, patients were grouped in creatinine clearance quartiles (<70, 70-90, 90-114, >114 mL/min) and analyzed for efficacy and bleeding risk. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify interactions between GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor used and creatinine clearance with respect to ischemic outcomes and bleeding.

RESULTS

Using unadjusted logistic regression tests for trend, 30-day death/myocardial infarction/urgent target vessel revascularization was greater in patients with lower creatinine clearances (7.3%, 8.5%, 5.1%, and 5.8%, P = .005), as were both major and minor bleeding. There was no interaction between assigned GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor, creatinine clearance and ischemic outcome, major bleeding or minor bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Both ischemic and bleeding complications are highest in the lowest creatinine clearance quartile of patients treated with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Although tirofiban is renally cleared and abciximab is not, there was no interaction between these GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and creatinine clearance regarding ischemic or bleeding events.

Anti-Xa Monitoring of Enoxaparin for Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients with Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on dosing of enoxaparin in patients with renal disease due to the routine exclusion of this population in clinical trials. To account for the potentially delayed drug elimination in these patients, we developed guidelines for adjusting enoxaparin dosing based on anti-Xa monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate anti-Xa level monitoring, resulting from the standards of practice as set out by our hospital's guidelines for enoxaparin dosing in renally impaired patients.

METHODS

A total of 72 separate acute coronary syndrome patient admissions were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had anti-Xa levels taken and creatinine clearance values <30 mL/min during enoxaparin therapy.

RESULTS

The average trough anti-Xa level at the once- and twice-daily doses was 0.40 and 0.72 IU/mL, respectively. With twice-daily dosing, only 6% of the trough concentrations were in the target range of 0.2–0.3 IU/mL compared with 36% with once-daily dosing. Of the 22 patients who had a change of dosing frequency from twice to once daily, 5% of trough anti-Xa levels were ≤0.5 IU/mL with twice-daily versus 68% with once-daily dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the relationship between anti-Xa activity, efficacy, and adverse effects has not been definitively established, anti-Xa levels can assist with dosing of enoxaparin in renally impaired patients. Our hospital guidelines are effective in adjusting dosing to reach target anti-Xa levels.

Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects

This article discusses platelet active drugs as part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. New data on antiplatelet agents include the following: (1) the role of aspirin in primary prevention has been the subject of recommendations based on the assessment of cardiovascular risk; (2) an increasing number of reports suggest a substantial interindividual variability in the response to antiplatelet agents, and various phenomena of "resistance" to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel; (3) the benefit/risk profile of currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists is substantially uncertain for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not routinely scheduled for early revascularization; (4) there is an expanding role for the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel in the long-term management of high-risk patients; and (5) the cardiovascular effects of selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have been the subject of increasing attention.

Emergency management of hemorrhagic complications in the era of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists, clopidogrel, low molecular weight heparin, and third-generation fibrinolytic agents

Antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and fibrinolytic agents are the mainstay for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In addition to their well-documented efficacy, these pharmacologic agents have the potential for the untoward effect of bleeding. Recent data suggest medication errors related to the dose, duration, and concomitant use of these agents contribute to increasing the risk of hemorrhage in patients treated for ACS. In the event of a major hemorrhage, clinicians should be aware of strategies used to reverse the pharmacologic effects of the offending agent. This paper critically assesses literature directed toward reversal of agents based on drug-specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic parameters.

Depolymerized holothurian glycosaminoglycan (DHG), a novel alternative anticoagulant for hemodialysis, is safe and effective in a dog renal failure model

BACKGROUND

Depolymerized holothurian glycosaminoglycan (DHG) is a new agent with anticoagulant properties quite different from those of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in terms of antithrombin III-dependency, and exerts an antithrombotic effect with less bleeding than UFH and LMWH in vivo. In this study, the anticoagulant and hemorrhagic effects of DHG were investigated on hemodialysis in a dog model of renal failure and compared with those of UFH, LMWH, and nafamostat mesilate (FUT).

METHODS

The dog renal failure model was prepared by 7/8 renal artery ligation. Effectiveness was based on completion of 3-hour hemodialysis, no marked clot deposition in the extracorporeal circuit, and permeability of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and creatinine. Template bleeding was measured by determining the hemoglobin content of the blood from the wound.

RESULTS

DHG induced no major bleeding or clot formation during 3-hour hemodialysis, in contrast to UFH and LMWH, each of which induced marked bleeding. These glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) were equally effective in decreasing plasma levels of BUN and creatinine. On the other hand, dogs treated with FUT failed to complete 3-hour hemodialysis. These anticoagulants prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) to different extents and GAGs prolonged thrombin clotting time markedly but FUT did not.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that thrombin clotting time prolongation can contribute to prevention of clot formation in extracorporeal circuits, and the non-antithrombin III-dependent activities of DHG may be related to its low risk of hemorrhage for hemodialysis. DHG appears to be promising as an alternative anticoagulant with low risk of hemorrhage for hemodialysis.

Assessment of anticoagulation using activated clotting times in patients receiving intravenous enoxaparin during percutaneous coronary intervention

Enoxaparin is being used more frequently in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this study, we determined the effect of intravenous enoxaparin on activated clotting time (ACT) measurements in the setting of PCI. In 67 consecutive patients, either 1 mg/kg intravenous enoxaparin alone was given for anticoagulation or 0.75 mg/kg given in patients receiving eptifibatide. ACT was measured before and 5 min following enoxaparin administration. After 1 mg/kg enoxaparin (n = 22), mean ACT increased from 122 +/- 22 to 199 +/- 20 sec. After 0.75 mg/kg enoxaparin and eptifibatide (n = 45), mean ACT increased from 125 +/- 22 to 194 +/- 24 sec. The mean increase in ACT was 77 +/- 26 sec in the 1 mg/kg group and 69 +/- 23 sec in the 0.75 mg/kg group (both P values < 0.0001). Moreover, in a subgroup of 26 patients, there was an excellent correlation (r = 0.86) between ACTs and the ENOX test, a new point-of-care test for assessing enoxaparin anticoagulation. None of the patients had transient abrupt closure, thrombus formation, major bleeding, or required urgent revascularization. Intravenous enoxaparin at clinically relevant doses with and without eptifibatide increases ACT levels at 5 min in patients undergoing PCI. These data suggest the ACT may be useful in the assessment of anticoagulation by enoxaparin.

A unique, low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to examine a unique and low dose of intravenous enoxaparin in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that would be applicable to an unselected population regardless of age, weight, renal function, or use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors.

BACKGROUND

There is limited experience of anticoagulation using intravenous (IV) low-molecular-weight heparin in PCI, which has been obtained with high doses causing elevated anticoagulation levels and delayed sheath withdrawal.

METHODS

A total of 242 consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI were treated with a single IV bolus of enoxaparin (0.5 mg/kg), and 26% of patients (n = 64) also received eptifibatide. Sheaths were removed immediately after the procedure in patients treated with enoxaparin only, and 4 h after the procedure in those also treated with eptifibatide.

RESULTS

A peak anti-Xa >0.5 IU/ml was obtained in 97.5% of the population, and 94.6% of patients had their peak anti-Xa level in the predefined target range of 0.5 to 1.5 IU/ml. Advanced age, renal failure, being overweight, and eptifibatide use did not alter the anticoagulation profile. At one-month follow-up, six patients (2.5%) had died, had a myocardial infarction, or undergone an urgent revascularization; all the patients had an anti-Xa level >0.5 IU/ml during PCI. Patients without an ischemic event and without a creatine kinase rise, but with a detectable troponin release in the next 24 h of PCI (>2 microg/ml, n = 21), had similar anti-Xa levels as those without troponin elevation. There were one major and three minor bleeding events that were not associated with anti-Xa overshoot.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose (0.5 mg/kg) IV enoxaparin allows a prespecified target level of anticoagulation (anti-Xa >0.5 IU/ml) in the vast majority of patients undergoing PCI, appears to be safe and effective, allows immediate sheath removal when used alone, and does not require dose adjustment when used with eptifibatide.