Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a new phenotype classification system and its relation to prognosis

Breast intraductal nanoformulations for treating ductal carcinoma in situ II: Dose de-escalation using a slow releasing/slow bioconverting prodrug strategy

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents approximately 20-25% of newly diagnosed breast cancers. DCIS is treated by surgery and possibly radiotherapy. Chemotherapy is only used as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy but not as primary therapy. The present study investigated the intraductal administration of Ciclopirox (CPX) formulated in nanosuspensions (NSs) or nanoparticles (NPs) to treat DCIS locally in a Fischer 344 rat model orthotopically implanted with 13762 Mat B III cells. Slow converting esterase responsive CPX prodrugs (CPDs) were successfully synthesized at high purity (> 95%) by directly acetylating the hydroxyl group or by appending a self-immolative linker between CPX and a phenolic ester. Direct esterification CPDs were not sufficiently stable so self-immolative CPDs were formulated in NSs and NPs. Prodrug release was evaluated from poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) NPs, and CPD4 demonstrated the slowest release rate with the rank order of CPD2 (R = methyl) > CPD3 (R = t-butyl) > CPD4 (R = phenyl). Intraductally administered CPX NS, CPD4 NS, and an innovative mixture of CDP4 NS and NPs (at 1 mg CPX equivalent/duct) demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) in vivo anti-tumor efficacy compared with immediate release (IR) CPX NS and non-treated controls. CPX mammary persistence at 6 h and 48 h after CPD4 NS or NP administration was also greater than after the immediate release CPX NS. A strong correlation between CPX mammary persistence and efficacy is demonstrated. In conclusion, nanoformulations utilizing a slow releasing/slow bioconverting CPX prodrug delivery strategy resulted in significant dose de-escalation (~ five fold) while maintaining anti-tumor efficacy.

Breast intraductal nanoformulations for treating ductal carcinoma in situ I: Exploring metal-ion complexation to slow ciclopirox release, enhance mammary persistence and efficacy

INTRODUCTION

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) represents a significant fraction (~20-25%) of all newly diagnosed breast cancer cases and, if left untreated, a significant fraction of patients will progress to invasive disease. Surgery is the only treatment option. Ciclopirox (CPX), an FDA-approved antifungal drug, has exhibited promising antitumor activity by down-regulating the expression of vital antiapoptotic cellular proteins and inhibiting the genetic expression of several oncogenic pathways. In this study, the feasibility of using nanoscale delivery systems to control release and prolong mammary tissue persistence of a lipophilic metal complex of CPX and Zinc (CPXZn) after intraductal administration was investigated.

METHODS

CPX and CPX-Zn nanosuspensions (NSs) were prepared using an evaporative nanoprecipitation-ultra-sonication method. Flash nanoprecipitation was used to prepare PLGA nanoparticles (NPs) loaded with CPXZn. Our established orthotopic DCIS rat model was used to evaluate efficacy. Briefly, two days after 13762 Mat B III cell intraductal inoculation, rats were divided into treatment groups and a single intraductal injection of CPX NS, CPX-Zn NS or CPX-Zn NPs was administered. In the first study arm, the efficacy of CPX NS (1, 3, 5 mg/duct) was evaluated. In the second arm, the in vivo efficacy of CPX NS, CPX-Zn NS and CPX-Zn loaded NPs was evaluated and compared at equivalent CPX doses. The mammary persistence of CPX from CPX NS, CPX-Zn NS, and CPX-Zn PLGA NPs was also assessed.

RESULTS

CPX-Zn complex was successfully synthesized and characterized by several spectral analyses. CPX release was slowed from the CPX-Zn NS and further slowed by incorporating CPX-Zn into PLGA NPs as compared to the CPX NS with release half times following the order: CPX NS < CPX-Zn NS << CPX-Zn NP. Intraductal CPX NS administration was dose and time dependent in suppressing tumor initiation suggesting prolonged mammary exposure may improve efficacy. In the second arm, mammary tissue persistence of CPX followed the rank order CPX NS < CPX-Zn NS << CPX-Zn NP at 6 h and 48 h post-administration. Prolonged mammary CPX exposure was highly correlated to improved efficacy. Prolonged CPX tissue persistence, attributed to slower release from the zinc complex and the PLGA NPs, resulted in a 5-fold dose reduction compared to the CPX NS.

CONCLUSIONS

The current results demonstrate that slowing drug release in the mammary duct after intraductal administration overcomes the rapid ductal clearance of CPX, prolongs mammary tissue persistence, improves efficacy against DCIS lesions in vivo, and requires 5-fold less CPX to achieve equivalent efficacy. The studies also provide a strategic path forward for developing a locally administered drug delivery system for treating DCIS, for which no primary chemotherapy option is available.

Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness

AIM

To assess the utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in diagnosing and characterizing breast malignancy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2006 to April 2009, all consecutive patients with breast cancer undergoing breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent surgery in our hospital were enrolled in this study. MRI was performed using a 1.5 T MRI unit using a dedicated, bilateral, four-channel breast coil. The MRI protocol included a diffusion sequence acquired using b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm(2). For each malignant lesion the relationships between tumour grade and histology and the relative value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were analysed.

RESULTS

There were 136 female patients with 162 lesions. Histology revealed 149 invasive carcinomas and 13 ductal carcinomas in situ. There were 34 grade 1, 61 grade 2, and 67 grade 3 lesions. The mean ADC value of all malignant lesions was 1.03×10(-3) mm(2)/s. The mean ADC values for invasive and in situ carcinomas were 1.03×10(-3) mm(2)/s and 1.05×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. The mean ADC values for grade 1, 2, and 3 tumours were 1.25×10(-3) mm(2)/s, 1.02×10(-3) mm(2)/s, and 0.92×10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively. A statistically significant (p<0.001) inverse correlation was disclosed between the ADC value and the tumour grading. The mean ADC value of the "less aggressive" group of disease (G1 and in situ lesions) was 1.19×10(-3) mm(2)/s, whereas the mean ADC value of the "more aggressive" group (G2-G3 invasive carcinomas) was 0.96×10(-3) mm(2)/s (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The study confirms the usefulness of diffusion imaging in assessing the aggressiveness of breast tumours. ADC appears to be a promising parameter in the evaluation of the degree of malignancy of breast cancer tissue.

Heterogeneity Between Ducts of the Same Nuclear Grade Involved by Duct Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the Breast

Purpose

Nuclear grade of breast DCIS is considered during patient management decision-making although it may have only a modest prognostic association with therapeutic outcome. We hypothesized that visual inspection may miss substantive differences in nuclei classified as having the same nuclear grade. To test this hypothesis, we measured subvisual nuclear features by quantitative image cytometry for nuclei with the same grade, and tested for statistical differences in these features.

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Thirty-nine nuclear digital image features of about 100 nuclei were measured in digital images of H&E stained slides of 81 breast biopsy specimens. One field with at least 5 ducts was evaluated for each patient. We compared features of nuclei with the same grade in multiple ducts of the same patient with ANOVA (or Welch test), and compared features of nuclei with the same grade in two ducts of different patients using 2-sided t-tests (P ≤ 0.05). Also, we compared image features for nuclei in patients with single grade to those with the same grade in patients with multiple grades using t-tests.

Results

Statistically significant differences were detected in nuclear features between ducts with the same nuclear grade, both in different ducts of the same patient, and between ducts in different patients with DCIS of more than one grade.

Conclusion

Nuclei in ducts visually described as having the same nuclear grade had significantly different subvisual digital image features. These subvisual differences may be considered additional manifestations of heterogeneity over and above differences that can be observed microscopically. This heterogeneity may explain the inconsistency of nuclear grading as a prognostic factor.

Effect of quantitative nuclear image features on recurrence of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS) of the breast

Background

Nuclear grade has been associated with breast DCIS recurrence and progression to invasive carcinoma; however, our previous study of a cohort of patients with breast DCIS did not find such an association with outcome. Fifty percent of patients had heterogeneous DCIS with more than one nuclear grade. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of quantitative nuclear features assessed with digital image analysis on ipsilateral DCIS recurrence.

Methods

Hematoxylin and eosin stained slides for a cohort of 80 patients with primary breast DCIS were reviewed and two fields with representative grade (or grades) were identified by a Pathologist and simultaneously used for acquisition of digital images for each field. Van Nuys worst nuclear grade was assigned, as was predominant grade, and heterogeneous grading when present. Patients were grouped by heterogeneity of their nuclear grade: Group A: nuclear grade 1 only, nuclear grades 1 and 2, or nuclear grade 2 only (32 patients), Group B: nuclear grades 1, 2 and 3, or nuclear grades 2 and 3 (31 patients), Group 3: nuclear grade 3 only (17 patients). Nuclear fine structure was assessed by software which captured thirty-nine nuclear feature values describing nuclear morphometry, densitometry, and texture. Step-wise forward Cox regressions were performed with previous clinical and pathologic factors, and the new image analysis features.

Results

Duplicate measurements were similar for 89.7% to 97.4% of assessed image features. The rate of correct classification of nuclear grading with digital image analysis features was similar in the two fields, and pooled assessment across both fields. In the pooled assessment, a discriminant function with one nuclear morphometric and one texture feature was significantly (p = 0.001) associated with nuclear grading, and provided correct jackknifed classification of a patient’s nuclear grade for Group A (78.1%), Group B (48.4%), and Group C (70.6%). The factors significantly associated with DCIS recurrence were those previously found, type of initial presentation (p = 0.03) and amount of parenchymal involvement (p = 0.05), along with the morphometry image feature of ellipticity (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Analysis of nuclear features measured by image cytometry may contribute to the classification and prognosis of breast DCIS patients with more than one nuclear grade.

American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast cancer

PURPOSE

To update the recommendations for the use of tumor marker tests in the prevention, screening, treatment, and surveillance of breast cancer.

METHODS

For the 2007 update, an Update Committee composed of members from the full Panel was formed to complete the review and analysis of data published since 1999. Computerized literature searches of MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library were performed. The Update Committee's literature review focused attention on available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of published tumor marker studies. In general, significant health outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, lesser toxicity, and cost-effectiveness) were used for making recommendations. Recommendations and

CONCLUSIONS

Thirteen categories of breast tumor markers were considered, six of which were new for the guideline. The following categories showed evidence of clinical utility and were recommended for use in practice: CA 15-3, CA 27.29, carcinoembryonic antigen, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, urokinase plasminogen activator, plasminogen activator inhibitor 1, and certain multiparameter gene expression assays. Not all applications for these markers were supported, however. The following categories demonstrated insufficient evidence to support routine use in clinical practice: DNA/ploidy by flow cytometry, p53, cathepsin D, cyclin E, proteomics, certain multiparameter assays, detection of bone marrow micrometastases, and circulating tumor cells.

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast (DCIS) with heterogeneity of nuclear grade: prognostic effects of quantitative nuclear assessment

BACKGROUND

Previously, 50% of patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) had more than one nuclear grade, and neither worst nor predominant nuclear grade was significantly associated with development of invasive carcinoma. Here, we used image analysis in addition to histologic evaluation to determine if quantification of nuclear features could provide additional prognostic information and hence impact prognostic assessments.

METHODS

Nuclear image features were extracted from about 200 nuclei of each of 80 patients with DCIS who underwent lumpectomy alone, and received no adjuvant systemic therapy. Nuclear images were obtained from 20 representative nuclei per duct, from each of a group of 5 ducts, in two separate fields, for 10 ducts. Reproducibility of image analysis features was determined, as was the ability of features to discriminate between nuclear grades. Patient information was available about clinical factors (age and method of DCIS detection), pathologic factors (DCIS size, nuclear grade, margin size, and amount of parenchymal involvement), and 39 image features (morphology, densitometry, and texture). The prognostic effects of these factors and features on the development of invasive breast cancer were examined with Cox step-wise multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Duplicate measurements were similar for 89.7% to 97.4% of assessed image features. For the pooled assessment with approximately 200 nuclei per patient, a discriminant function with one densitometric and two texture features was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with nuclear grading, and provided 78.8% correct jackknifed classification of a patient's nuclear grade. In multivariate assessments, image analysis nuclear features had significant prognostic associations (p <or= 0.05) with the development of invasive breast cancer. Texture (difference entropy, p < 0.001; contrast, p < 0.001; peak transition probability, p = 0.01), densitometry (range density, p = 0.004), and measured margin (p = 0.05) were associated with development of invasive disease for the pooled data across all ducts.

CONCLUSION

Image analysis provided reproducible assessments of nuclear features which quantitated differences in nuclear grading for patients. Quantitative nuclear image features indicated prognostically significant differences in DCIS, and may contribute additional information to prognostic assessments of which patients are likely to develop invasive disease.

Prognostische Faktoren beim duktalen Carcinoma in situ

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a heterogeneous disease that progresses to invasive cancer in 30-50% of the patients. Its natural history is poorly defined so that we are unable to identify cases of DCIS that do not progress to invasive carcinoma during an individual's lifetime. However, pathologic features of DCIS are nowadays the basis for the estimation of the prognosis and planning of therapy. Exclusion of microinvasion, characterization of nuclear grade, architecture, size and distribution of the DCIS, presence or absence of comedonecrosis as well as the assessment of surgical margins are relevant factors for local treatment. The determination of steroid hormone receptor status is indicated in patients considering tamoxifen therapy after breast conservation. It is advisable to evaluate the features according to internationally accepted guidelines with proven prognostic relevance and reproducibility. Nevertheless, better prognostic factors are needed to adapt the management of this increasingly diagnosed disease to the individual patient.

Protein expression of c-erbB-2 and p53 in normal ducts, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma of the same breast

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Breast cancer is thought to derive from progressively aberrant, non-invasive breast lesions, but it is not known exactly how invasive breast cancer develops from these lesions. The aim of this study was to verify the changes in c-erbB-2 and p53 protein expression between non-neoplastic ducts, ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive ductal carcinoma found in the same breast.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a cross-sectional study at Centro de Atenção Integral à Saúde da Mulher, Campinas, Brazil.

METHODS

Fifty-six women with invasive ductal carcinoma and ductal carcinoma in situ in the same breast were included. The expression of c-erbB-2 and p53 proteins was assessed in non-neoplastic and neoplastic cells using immunohistochemical techniques.

RESULTS

The c-erbB-2 protein was absent in non-neoplastic ducts but was present in 46% and 36% of in situ and invasive carcinoma components, respectively. Only 2% of non-neoplastic ducts, and 18% and 16% of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma components, respectively, were positive for p53 protein. No significant difference in c-erbB-2 and p53 protein expression was observed between in situ and invasive components. The nuclear grade agreement between in situ and invasive carcinoma was very good.

CONCLUSIONS

The invasiveness of ductal carcinoma in situ seems to be independent of the Her-2/neu and TP53 genes. The general features of an occurrence of breast carcinoma are formulated at the outset of carcinogenesis, and the Her-2/neu and TP53 genes are involved.

Autoantibodies to Annexin XI-A and Other Autoantigens in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

We report on the identification of autoantigens commonly recognized by sera from patients with breast cancer. We selected ten sera from patients with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) of the breast with high titer IgG autoantibodies for biopanning of a T7 phage breast cancer cDNA display library. A high throughput method involved the assembly of 938 T7 phages encoding potential breast cancer autoantigens. Microarrays of positive phages were probed with sera from 90 patients with breast cancer [15 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 75 patients with IDC of the breast], with 51 non-cancer control sera and with sera from 21 patients with systemic autoimmune diseases. A 12-phage breast cancer predictor group was constructed with phage inserts recognized by sera from patients with breast cancer and not by non-cancer or autoimmune control sera (P < 0.0001). Several autoantigens including annexin XI-A, the p80 subunit of the Ku antigen, ribosomal protein S6, and other unknown autoantigens could significantly discriminate between breast cancer and non-cancer control sera. Biopanning with three different sera led to the cloning of partial cDNA sequences identical to annexin XI-A. IgG autoantibodies reacting with the amino acid 41-74 sequence of annexin XI-A were found in 19% of all women with breast cancer but in 60% of sera from women with DCIS of the breast. In addition, partial sequences identical to annexin XI-A, nucleolar protein interacting with the forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of pKi-67, the KIAA1671 gene product, ribosomal protein S6, cyclin K, elongation factor-2, Grb2-associated protein 2, and other unknown proteins could distinguish DCIS from IDC of the breast and appear to be potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges

The incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), a noninvasive form of breast cancer, has increased markedly in recent decades, and DCIS now accounts for approximately 20% of breast cancers diagnosed by mammography. Laboratory and patient data suggest that DCIS is a precursor lesion for invasive cancer. The appropriate classification of DCIS has provoked much debate; a number of classification systems have been developed, but there is a lack of uniformity in the diagnosis and prognostication of this disease. Further investigation of molecular markers should improve the classification of DCIS and our understanding of its relationship to invasive disease. Controversy also exists with regard to the optimal management of DCIS patients. In the past, mastectomy was the primary treatment for patients with DCIS, but as with invasive cancer, breast-conserving surgery has become the standard approach. Three randomized trials have reported a statistically significant decrease in the risk of recurrence with radiation therapy in combination with lumpectomy compared with lumpectomy alone, but there was no survival advantage with the addition of radiotherapy. Two randomized trials have suggested an additional benefit, in terms of recurrence, with the addition of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, although in one trial the benefit was not statistically significant. Current data suggest that tamoxifen use should be restricted to patients with estrogen receptor-positive DCIS. Neither trial demonstrated a survival benefit with adjuvant tamoxifen. Ongoing and recently completed studies should provide information on outcomes in patients treated with lumpectomy alone and on the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors as an alternative to tamoxifen.

Molecular evolutionary patterns in breast cancer

Geno-phenotypic patterns of pre-invasive and invasive lobular breast cancers and infiltrating ductal carcinomas of low, intermediate, and high grade are reviewed. One of the main differences between lobular breast cancers and ductal carcinomas is the presence of inactivating E-cadherin gene mutations in lobular breast cancers. In many other respects, lobular breast cancers and low-grade ductal carcinomas exhibit similar geno-phenotypic profiles. The development of p53 dysfunction may be a hallmark of infiltrating ductal cancers of intermediate and high grade. Sequential Her-2/neu and ras abnormalities define a subset of aggressive high-grade tumors, and the development of Rb dysfunction may define a separate subset of aggressive ductal cancers. Based on these observations, a branching molecular evolutionary model for the development and progression of breast cancer is proposed.