Changes in gastrin and serum pepsinogens in monitoring of Helicobacter pylori response to therapy

Clinical value of serum pepsinogen in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric diseases

Pepsinogen, secreted from the gastric mucosa, is the precursor of pepsin. It is categorized as pepsinogen 1 and pepsinogen 2 based on its immunogenicity. The pepsinogen content that can enter the blood circulation through the capillaries of the gastric mucosa is approximately 1% and remains stable all the time. The pepsinogen content in serum will change with the pathological changes of gastric mucosa. Therefore, the level of pepsinogen in serum can play a role in serologic biopsy to reflect the function and morphology of different regions of gastric mucosa and serve as an indicator of gastric disease. This study conducts relevant research on serum pepsinogen 1, pepsinogen 2, and the ratio of pepsinogen 1 to pepsinogen 2, and reviews their important value in clinical diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection, gastric ulcer, and even gastric carcinoma, providing ideas for other researchers.

Serum pepsinogen cut-off values in Helicobacter pylori-infected children

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the standard values for gender- and age-stratified serum pepsinogen (sPG) in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) non-infected children and to determine the optimal cut-off values of sPG for predicting H. pylori-infected gastritis in children.

METHODS

A prospective study for determination of sPG levels was performed in children with epigastric pain who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy over the past 16 years. After excluding subjects diagnosed with inflammatory bowel diseases, eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders, or immunoglobulin A vasculitis, the diagnosis of H. pylori infection was defined by positive tissue culture or concordant-positive results for histology and the rapid urease test.

RESULTS

A total of 405 subjects were diagnosed as being H. pylori-infected (79) or non-infected (326). In the H. pylori non-infected group, there were no significant differences in sPG levels among age groups; males had higher sPG I and sPG II levels than females. In the H. pylori-infected group, sPG I and sPG II levels were significantly higher and the sPG I/II ratio was lower than those in the non-infected group. In receiver operating characteristics analyses in diagnosing H. pylori infection, the areas under the curves for sPG I, sPG II and sPG I/II ratio were 0.896, 0.980, and 0.946, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of sPG II of ≥9.0 ng/mL was considered positive for H. pylori infection (sensitivity: 92.4%, specificity: 93.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal cut-off value of sPG II of ≥9.0 ng/mL may be a good predictor of H. pylori-infected gastritis in children.

A significant increase in the pepsinogen I/II ratio is a reliable biomarker for successful Helicobacter pylori eradication

Background

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is usually assessed using the ¹³C-urea breath test (UBT), anti-H. pylori antibody and the H. pylori stool antigen test. However, a few reports have used pepsinogen (PG), in particular, the percentage change in the PG I/II ratio. Here, we evaluated the usefulness of the percentage changes in serum PG I/II ratios for determining the success of eradication therapy for H. pylori.

Materials and methods

In total, 650 patients received eradication therapy from October 2008 to March 2013 in our Cancer Institute Hospital. We evaluated the relationship between H. pylori eradication and percentage changes in serum PG I/II ratios before and 3 months after treatment with CLEIA^® (FUJIREBIO Inc, Tokyo, Japan). The gold standard of H. pylori eradication was defined as negative by the UBT performed 3 months after completion of eradication treatment. Cut-off values for percentage changes in serum PG I/II ratios were set as +40, +25 and +10% when the serum PG I/II ratio before treatment was below 3.0, above 3.0 but below 5.0 and 5.0 or above, respectively.

Results

Serum PG I and PG II levels were measured in 562 patients with H. pylori infection before and after eradication therapy. Eradication of H. pylori was achieved in 433 patients studied (77.0%). The ratios of first, second, third-line and penicillin allergy eradication treatment were 73.8% (317/429), 88.3% (99/112), 75% (12/16) and 100% (5/5), respectively. An increasing percentage in the serum levels of the PG I/II ratios after treatment compared with the values before treatment clearly distinguished success from failure of eradication (108.2±57.2 vs. 6.8±30.7, p<0.05). Using the above cut-off values, the sensitivity, specificity and validity for determination of H. pylori were 93.1, 93.8 and 93.2%, respectively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the percentage changes in serum PG I/II ratios are useful as evaluation criteria for assessing the success of eradication therapy for H. pylori.

Long-term dynamics of gastric biomarkers after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Secretion of pepsinogen I (PgI), pepsinogen II (PgII), fasting gastrin-17 (fG-17) and stimulated gastrin-17 (sG-17) changes after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Few data are available on the long-term dynamics of gastric biomarkers after H. pylori eradication.The aim of this study was to investigate the dynamics of gastric biomarkers in H. pylori-positive patients after eradication over a 3-year period and to compare the levels with initially H. pylori-negative patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Blood samples for the detection of gastric biomarkers were obtained from dyspeptic patients coming for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. In H. pylori-positive patients, after eradication therapy, three follow-up blood samples were drawn after 12, 24 and 36 months; in H. pylori-negative patients, two samples were taken - at 12 and after 30 months. Median values of biomarkers in follow-up samples were compared with the baseline sample.

RESULTS

The final sample included 110 patients (median age 67 years, M/F ratio 27/83). In patients after H. pylori eradication (n=83) PgI, PgII, fG-17 and sG-17 had decreased significantly during a 36-month period, whereas the PgI/PgII ratio had increased significantly from 5.59 to 11.64.

CONCLUSION

In H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients, after eradication therapy, a decrease in PgI, PgII, fG-17 and sG-17 was observed after 36 months whereas an increase in the PgI/II ratio suggested an improvement in gastric atrophy. The median levels of gastric biomarkers in patients after H. pylori eradication therapy may become similar to biomarker levels among initially H. pylori-negative individuals.

Pepsinogen testing for evaluation of the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication at 4 weeks after completion of therapy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pepsinogen levels in plasma are increased by inflammation in the gastric mucosa, including inflammation resulting from Helicobacter pylori infection. A decrease in pepsinogen II level has been suggested as a reliable marker to confirm the successful eradication of infection. The aim of our study was to evaluate the potential role of pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and H. pylori antibodies in confirming successful eradication.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Altogether 42 patients (25 women, 17 men), mean age 45 years (range 23-74), were enrolled. Pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and H. pylori IgG antibodies were measured in plasma samples using an ELISA test (Biohit, Oyj., Finland) before the eradication and 4 weeks after completing the treatment. The success of eradication was determined by a urea breath test.

RESULTS

Eradication was successful in 31 patients (74%) and unsuccessful in 11 patients (26%). Pepsinogen II decreased significantly in both the successful (P=0.029) and unsuccessful (P=0.042) eradication groups. Pepsinogen I decreased significantly in the successful (P=0.025) but not the unsuccessful (P=0.29) eradication group. The pepsinogen I/II ratio increased in the successful eradication group (P=0.0018) but not in the group in which treatment failed (P=0.12). There were no differences in gastrin-17 or H. pylori antibody values.

CONCLUSIONS

A decrease in pepsinogen II levels cannot be used as a reliable marker for the successful eradication of H. pylori 4 weeks after the completion of treatment. The increase in pepsinogen I/II ratio reflects differences in pepsinogen production following the eradication irrespective of improvement in atrophy.

Identification of a high risk gastric cancer group using serum pepsinogen after successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pepsinogen (PG) method is widely used to identify high risk groups of gastric cancer. It is very useful before Helicobacter pylori eradication, but after eradication the method becomes useless because the PGI, PGII, PGI/II ratios change. Therefore, we aimed to identify a high risk group for gastric cancer using serum pepsinogen after successful eradication of H. pylori.

METHODS

A total of 261 participants were enrolled after successful eradication of H. pylori in Hokkaido University Hospital from 1995 to 2010. Participants with renal failure, taking proton pump inhibitors, and those with advanced gastric cancer were excluded. Serum levels of PGI and II were measured using chemiluminescent immunoassay method.

RESULTS

Receiver operating characteristic curves using cancerous and non-cancerous data in post-eradication determined the optimal cut-off value of PGI/II as 4.5. The sensitivity and the specificity were 65.9% and 79.3%, respectively. The usual PG method includes 48.9% of cancer cases, and the PGI/II ≤ 4.5 in post-eradication includes 65.9% of them, and it includes approximately half of the high risk group of diffuse type cancer. PGI/II ≤ 4.5 in post-eradication included many gastric cancer cases detected after eradication (12/16 = 75%).

CONCLUSION

In the identification of a high risk group for gastric cancer, we suggest that the optimal cut-off value of PGI/II after successful eradication of H. pylori is 4.5. PGI/II ≤ 4.5 in post-eradication includes more gastric cancer cases compared with the traditional PG method, and 75% of gastric cancer cases detected after eradication.

Quantification of serum levels of pepsinogens and gastrin to assess eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We investigated whether serum levels of pepsinogen (sPG)I and sPGII, the ratio of sPGI to sPGII, or serum levels of gastrin-17 (sG17), can be used to assess eradication of Helicobacter Pylori 8 weeks after treatment.

METHODS

We performed a prospective study of 228 consecutive patients with H pylori infections. At the start of the trial (baseline), patients were assessed using the (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) and endoscopy, and serum levels of pepsinogens and gastrin levels were measured. Patients were offered a 7-day triple therapy and asked to return 8 weeks after treatment for another (13)C-UBT and measurements of serum levels of sG17, sPGI, and sPGII (175 patients completed the study).

RESULTS

The eradication rate of H pylori was 67%. Percentage variation in levels of sPGI and sPGII, the ratio of sPGI to sPGII, and in levels of sG17 resulted in area under the curve values of 0.858, 0.973, 0.940, and 0.810, respectively, for H pylori eradication. A decrease of 22.7% or greater in the level of sPGII detected H pylori eradication with 100% sensitivity and 96.6% specificity. Spectrum analysis did not identify differences in accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Percentage variation of sPGII levels 8 weeks after therapy for H pylori infection correlates with eradication. Additional studies are needed to confirm these results.

The role of serum pepsinogen and gastrin test for the detection of gastric cancer in Korea

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study was performed to determine whether serum pepsinogen (PG) and gastrin testing can be used to detect gastric cancer in Korea.

METHODS

Serum levels of PG I (sPGI) and sPGII, PG I/II ratios, and gastrin levels were measured in 1006 patients with gastroduodenal diseases including cancer. Follow-up tests were performed 1 year after Helicobacter pylori eradication.

RESULTS

sPGI and sPGII levels increased and PG I/II ratios decreased in line with the severity of activity, chronic inflammation, and the presence of H. pylori (p < .01). In contrast, sPGI levels and PG I/II ratios decreased in proportion with the severity of atrophic gastritis (AG)/intestinal metaplasia (p < .01). Gastrin levels were found to be correlated with chronic inflammation negatively in the antrum but positively in the corpus. H. pylori eradication reduced sPGI, sPGII, and gastrin levels, and increased PG I/II ratios to the levels of H. pylori-negative patients, and was found to be correlated with reductions in activity and chronic inflammation of gastritis. The sensitivity and specificity of a PG I/II ratio of < or = 3.0 for the detection of dysplasia or cancer were 55.8-62.3% and 61%, respectively. In addition, sPGI and sPGII levels of intestinal-type cancer were significantly lower than those of the diffuse type, respectively (p = .008 and p = .05, respectively). Gastric cancer risk was highest in the H. pylori-positive, low PGI/II ratio (< or = 3.0) group with an odds ratio of 5.52 (confidence interval: 2.83-10.77).

CONCLUSION

PG I/II ratio (< or = 3.0) was found to be a reliable marker for the detection of dysplasia or gastric cancer, especially of the intestinal type. This detection power of PG I/II ratio (< or = 3.0) significantly increased in the presence of H. pylori, and thus, provides a means of selecting those at high risk of developing gastric cancer in Korea.

Probiotic intervention decreases serum gastrin-17 in Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND

Previously we showed that a probiotic combination with L. rhamnosus GG was beneficial as an adjuvant therapy during H. pylori eradication.

AIM

To evaluate whether probiotic combination with LGG adheres to the upper gastrointestinal mucosa and modifies H. pylori colonisation and H. pylori induced inflammation.

METHODS

Thirteen patients referred for gastroduodenoscopy received a drink consisting of equal doses (2.5x10(9)CFU) of LGG, L. rhamnosus LC705, Propionibacterium freudenreichii JS and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12 daily. Recovery of probiotics in biopsies (antrum, corpus, duodenum) and faecal samples was evaluated by strain-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction. H. pylori colonization and gastric inflammation was investigated by urease activity ((13)C-urea breath test), histology and serum pepsinogen I, II and gastrin-17 measurements.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were fully investigated; of these three of the patients had LGG adhering to the biopsies at end of the intervention. Other probiotic strains were not detected, even though the recovery of all individual probiotic strains from the faeces was significantly increased (p<0.01). After the treatment, the level of (13)C-urea breath test (p=0.063) and gastrin-17 (p=0.046) decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

The decreases in (13)C-urea breath test and gastrin-17 indicate that the probiotic combination exerts a beneficial effect on gastric mucosa in H. pylori infected patients. LGG showed marginal ability to adhere to the upper gastrointestinal tract mucosa.

Non-invasive assessment of chronic liver and gastric diseases

BACKGROUND

In patients with both chronic liver diseases and dyspepsia there is the need for non-invasive, inexpensive and effective laboratory tests. These tests should not substitute but complement and integrate the information derived from invasive techniques such as liver biopsy and esofagogastroduodenoscopy. Natural history studies indicate that advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis develop in about 20%-40% of patients with chronic hepatitis B or C, and in a similar proportion of those with alcoholic or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. In these patients, precise definition of the hepatic fibrosis stage is the most important parameter to assess the risk of disease progression and to decide for an immediate and appropriate antiviral therapy.

METHODS

Liver biopsy represents the gold standard for evaluating the presence, type and stage of liver fibrosis but a body of evidence has been accumulated to demonstrate the limitations of this technique, including inter- and intra-observer variations, sampling errors and variability. In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the possibility of identifying and describing liver fibrosis by using non-invasive, surrogate markers measurable in blood. Many studies have been dedicated to the evaluation of "direct" markers of fibrogenesis, while a second approach is based on the evaluation of single or combined biochemical parameters that reflect the stage of liver disease. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms are common in developed countries and this makes impossible the use of esofagogastroduodenoscopy in all patients with dyspepsia. The Maastricht 2-2000 Consensus meeting has suggested screening and treating Helicobacter pylori infection in dyspeptic patients in primary health care as the first line of therapy for newly onset dyspepsia.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination panels of biomarkers have been demonstrated to improve the accuracy of the single tests and with the use of algorithms based on sequential combination of non-invasive biomarkers a high diagnostic accuracy has been achieved for liver fibrosis. This, in turn, translates in a reduction by >50% in the need of taking liver biopsies. A biochemical panel which includes the measurement of serum pepsinogen I and II, gastrin G-17 and anti-H. pylori antibodies for patients with gastric disease, due to its high negative predictive value, appears to be a valuable approach to screen patients <55 years and with no alarm features, assuring safety and cost-effectiveness.

Capsaicin and gastric ulcers

In recent years, infection of the stomach with the organism Helicobacter Pylori has been found to be the main cause of gastric ulcers, one of the common ailments afflicting humans. Excessive acid secretion in the stomach, reduction in gastric mucosal blood flow, constant intake of non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), ethanol, smoking, stress etc. are also considered responsible for ulcer formation. The prevalent notion among sections of population in this country and perhaps in others is that "red pepper" popularly known as "Chilli," a common spice consumed in excessive amounts leads to "gastric ulcers" in view of its irritant and likely acid secreting nature. Persons with ulcers are advised either to limit or avoid its use. However, investigations carried out in recent years have revealed that chilli or its active principle "capsaicin" is not the cause for ulcer formation but a "benefactor." Capsaicin does not stimulate but inhibits acid secretion, stimulates alkali, mucus secretions and particularly gastric mucosal blood flow which help in prevention and healing of ulcers. Capsaicin acts by stimulating afferent neurons in the stomach and signals for protection against injury causing agents. Epidemiologic surveys in Singapore have shown that gastric ulcers are three times more common in the "Chinese" than among Malaysians and Indians who are in the habit of consuming more chillis. Ulcers are common among people who are in the habit of taking NSAIDS and are infected with the organism "Helicobacter Pylori," responsible for excessive acid secretion and erosion of the mucosal layer. Eradication of the bacteria by antibiotic treatment and avoiding the NSAIDS eliminates ulcers and restores normal acid secretion.

Clinical usefulness of serum pepsinogens I and II, gastrin-17 and anti-Helicobacterpylori antibodies in the management of dyspeptic patients in primary care

BACKGROUND

Several tests have been proposed for evaluating dyspeptic symptoms and their relationship to the underlying gastric disease. Serum pepsinogens and gastrin-17 are known to be useful biomarkers for the detection of gastric pathologies.

AIM

To evaluate the capability of screening dyspeptic patients in the primary care by analyses of serum pepsinogens I (sPGI) and II (sPGII), gastrin-17 (sG-17) and the IgG anti-Helicobacter pylori antibodies (IgG-Hp).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and sixty-two consecutive patients with dyspeptic symptoms (208 females, mean age 50.6 +/- 16 years, range 18-88 years) referred by general practitioners for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy were enrolled. A blood sample was taken from each subject for IgG-Hp, sPGI, sPGII and sG-17 analyses.

RESULTS

Two hundred and eighty-seven patients had a complete screening; of these, 132 resulted positive for Hp infection. Patients with atrophic chronic gastritis showed significantly lower serum pepsinogen I levels and sPGI/sPGII ratio than patients with non-atrophic chronic gastritis. Moreover, by calculating the values of sPGI by sG-17 and sG-17 by sPGII/sPGI, subjects with atrophic chronic gastritis could be distinguished from those with non-atrophic chronic gastritis and from those with normal mucosa, respectively. sG-17 levels were found to be a useful biomarker for the detection of antral atrophic gastritis, while the combination of sPGI, the sPGI/sPGII ratio and sG-17 was found effective in identifying corpus atrophy.

CONCLUSION

A panel composed of PGI, PGII, G-17 and IgG-Hp could be used as a first approach in the 'test and scope' and/or 'test and treat' strategy in the primary care management of dyspeptic patients.

Teprenone, but not H2-receptor blocker or sucralfate, suppresses corpus Helicobacter pylori colonization and gastritis in humans: teprenone inhibition of H. pylori-induced interleukin-8 in MKN28 gastric epithelial cell lines

BACKGROUND

The role of teprenone in Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis has yet to be determined. To investigate the effect of teprenone on inflammatory cell infiltration, and on H. pylori colonization of the gastric mucosa in H. pylori-infected patients, we first compared the effect of teprenone with that of both histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2-RA) and sucralfate on the histological scores of H. pylori gastritis. We then examined its in vitro effect on H. pylori-induced interleukin (IL)-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 68 patients were divided into three groups, each group undergoing a 3-month treatment with either teprenone (150 mg/day), H2-RA (nizatidine, 300 mg/day), or sucralfate (3 g/day). All subjects underwent endoscopic examination of the stomach before and after treatment. IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

Following treatment, the teprenone group showed a significant decrease in both neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density of the corpus (before vs. after: 2.49 +/- 0.22 vs. 2.15 +/- 0.23, p =.009; 2.36 +/- 0.25 vs. 2.00 +/- 0.24, p =.035, respectively), with no significant differences seen in either the sucralfate or H2-RA groups. Teprenone inhibited H. pylori-enhanced IL-8 production in MKN28 gastric epithelial cells in vitro, in a dose-dependent manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Teprenone may modify corpus H. pylori-associated gastritis through its effect on neutrophil infiltration and H. pylori density, in part by its inhibition of IL-8 production in the gastric mucosa.

N/A

N/A

[Basal concentrations of gastrin and pepsinogen I and II in gastric ulcer: influence of Helicobacter pylori infection and usefulness in the control of the eradication]

AIM

To study the influence of Helicobacter pylori eradication on basal gastrin and pepsinogen I and II levels in patients with gastric ulcer over a 1-year follow-up period, and to assess the usefulness of these values in confirming H. pylori eradication after treatment.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients with gastric ulcer and H. pylori infection were prospectively studied. At the beginning of the study, endoscopy with biopsies for histologic examination and urease testing was carried out, as were 13C-urea breath test and blood samples for determination of gastrin and pepsinogen I and II values by radioimmunoassay and serology. Histologic study, 13C-urea breath test and laboratory determinations were repeated at months 1, 6 and 12 after completion of eradication treatment.

RESULTS

H. pylori infection was eradicated in 82.1% of patients. In patients with successful H. pylori eradication, the initial mean gastrin value was 75.5 +/- 39.1 pg/ml, while at 1 month after treatment this value decreased to 49.2 +/- 21 pg/ml (p < 0.0001). No further reductions were noted. Initial pepsinogen I and II values were 104 +/- 58 and 15.8 +/- 10 ng/ml, respectively, whereas at month 1 after treatment these values were 77 +/- 42 and 7.3 +/- 4 ng/ml, respectively (p < 0.0001) and were 72 +/- 41 and 6.7 +/- 3 ng/ml respectively at month 6 (p < 0.01); no further variations were observed thereafter. The area under the ROC curve which reveals eradication through reductions in hormonal values was 0.70 for gastrin, 0.78 for pepsinogen I, 0.93 for pepsinogen II and 0.92 for the pepsinogen I/II ratio. At months 6 and 12 after treatment completion, differences in mean gastrin and pepsinogen I and II values between the patients with normal histologic findings and those with chronic gastritis were significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

a) H. pylori eradication is associated with an early fall in basal gastrin values and a progressive decrease in basal pepsinogen I and II values. b) In patients with gastric ulcer, determination of the decrease in basal pepsinogen II levels is a useful and early non-invasive method for confirming eradication. c) Determination of gastrin and pepsinogen I and II values may be useful for assessing improvement in gastritis 6 months after treatment completion.

"Familial hyperpepsinogenemia" and Helicobacter pylori infection

OBJECTIVE

Pepsinogen 1 (PG1) is a proenzyme precursor to pepsin, a protease secreted by the gastric chief cell. PG1 levels correlate with maximal gastric acid output. In 1979, Rotter et al. reported two pedigrees in which elevated PG1 levels and duodenal ulcers were prevalent. They proposed autosomal dominant inheritance of elevated PG1 and suggested that it was a risk factor for duodenal ulcer disease. In 1982, Helicobacter pylori (Hp) was discovered and was shown to be an important factor in peptic ulcer disease. Hp infection is also associated with increased PGI levels. We tested serum from one of the original pedigrees for Hp antibodies to determine whether Hp infection could explain the ulcers and elevated PG1 levels.

METHODS

ELISA tests were performed using the urease fraction of a crushed Hp extract. Banked serum from one of the original families was thawed and tested.

RESULTS

Of the subjects, 90% (nine of 10) with elevated PG1 were seropositive for Hp, compared to only 31% (17 of 55) of those with normal PG1 levels (p < 0.001). The mean PG1 level was higher in the seropositive (94.1+/-13.3 ng/ml) than the seronegative subjects (54.8+/-3.6, p < 0.05). Three of the four subjects with ulcers were Hp-seropositive. The prevalence of Hp-seropositivity and elevated PG1 declined in parallel in each successive generation. When neither parent was seropositive, children were seronegative.

CONCLUSIONS

The etiology of elevated PG1 levels in this pedigree is more likely due to Helicobacter pylori infection than to a genetic predisposition.

Helicobacter pylori. One bacterium and a broad spectrum of human disease! An overview

Since the historical rediscovery of gastric spiral Helicobacter pylori in the gastric mucosa of patients with chronic gastritis by Warren and Marshall in 1983, peptic ulcer disease has been largely viewed as being of infectious aetiology. Indeed, there is a strong association between the presence of H. pylori and chronic active gastritis in histology. The bacterium can be isolated in not less than 70% of gastric and in over 90% of duodenal ulcer patients. Eradication of the organism has been associated with histologic improvement of gastritis, lower relapse rate and less risk of bleeding from duodenal ulcer. The bacterium possesses several virulence factors enabling it to survive the strong acid milieu inside the stomach and possibly damaging host tissues. The sequence of events by which the bacterium might cause gastric or duodenal ulcer is still not fully elucidated and Koch's postulates have never been fulfilled. In the majority of individuals, H. pylori infection is largely or entirely asymptomatic and there is no convincing data to suggest an increase in the prevalence of peptic ulcer disease among these subjects. An increasingly growing body of literature suggests an association between colonization by H. pylori in the stomach and a risk for developing gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT), MALT lymphoma, gastric adenocarcinoma and even pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The bacterium has been implicated also in a number of extra-gastrointestinal disorders such as ischaemic heart disease, ischaemic cerebrovascular disease, atherosclerosis, and skin diseases such as rosacea, but a causal role for the bacterium is missing. Eradication of H. pylori thus seems to be a beneficial impact on human health. Various drug regimens are in use to eradicate H. pylori involving the administration of three or four drugs including bismuth compounds, metronidazole, clarithromycin, tetracyclines, amoxycillin, ranitidine, omeprazole for 1-2 weeks. The financial burden, side effects and emergence of drug resistant strains due to an increase in the use in antibiotics for H. pylori eradication therapy need further reconsideration.

Significance of serum pepsinogens and their relationship to Helicobacter pylori infection and histological gastritis in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Previous investigations reported that patients undergoing dialysis therapy had significantly higher serum pepsinogen (PG) levels than patients with normal renal function. However, in dialysis patients, the relationship between serum PG levels and Helicobacter pylori infection remains unknown.

METHODS

Sixty three maintenance dialysis patients (54 haemodialysis and nine continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis) who required endoscopic examination were enrolled in the study. Sixty four age- and sex-matched patients with normal renal function served as controls. We performed endoscopic examination and obtained both the gastric antral and corpus mucosa for histopathological evaluation and H. pylori identification. Twenty three patients on dialysis underwent H. pylori eradication therapy.

RESULTS

In dialysis patients, H. pylori-positives had significantly higher serum PG II levels than H. pylori-negatives (26.6+/-21.5 vs 14.1+/-7.1 ng/ml, P<0.05), but no significant difference was found in serum PG I between H. pylori-positives and H. pylori-negatives (228.8+/-158.5 vs 179. 4+/-113.5 ng/ml). There was no significant difference in serum PG II between dialysis patients and controls (19.9+/-16.5 vs 18.6+/-14.9 ng/ml), while serum PG I levels were significantly higher in dialysis patients than in controls (201.7+/-136.8 vs 77.6+/-85.8 ng/ml, P<0.05). Serum PG II levels, but not those of PG I, significantly correlated with the inflammation and activity scores of antrum in dialysis patients, and these scores were highly influenced by H. pylori infection. Dialysis patients in whom H. pylori was eradicated successfully showed significant reductions of serum PG II levels but not of PG I.

CONCLUSIONS

In dialysis patients, high serum levels of PG II, but not PG I, are significantly related to H. pylori infection and mucosal inflammation. A significant decrease in serum PG II levels could be used as a predictor of the eradication of H. pylori infection in dialysis patients.

Noninvasive evaluation of Helicobacter pylori therapy: role of fasting or postprandial gastrin, pepsinogen I, pepsinogen II, or serum IgG antibodies

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the potential value of a change in serum IgG antibodies, fasting or meal-stimulated gastrin levels, and pepsinogen I (PGI) or pepsinogen II (PGII) levels for identifying Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status after antibiotic therapy.

METHODS

A total of 32 men and one woman with peptic ulcer disease and documented H. pylori infection were enrolled. Fasting and 30-min postprandial blood samples were obtained at 0, 2, 7, 11, 17, 23, 27, and 39 wk of the study and were analyzed for the factors evaluated.

RESULTS

Treatment was successful in 25 patients and failed in seven. Serum IgG antibodies, meal-stimulated gastrin, and both fasting and meal-stimulated pepsinogen I and II levels fell throughout the study, and pepsinogen I:II ratios increased in those whose infection was cured. The mean levels at wk 0 versus wk 7 were: fasting gastrin (fmol/ml) 12.4 and 11, meal-stimulated gastrin 26.5 and 15.4, PGI (ng/ml) 83.7 and 59, PGII (ng/ml) 24.5 and 13.6, PGI/PGII 3.5 and 4.7, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay value 4.8 and 4.55. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the data analyzed using different percent changes (e.g., 80%, 50%, and 20%) were calculated. The specificity and sensitivity remained <80% at all time points.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a significant fall in serum markers of H. pylori infection in groups of individuals, no marker tested could be used to reliably determine posttherapy H. pylori status for individual patients.

Helicobacter pylori and functional dyspepsia: a real causal link?

This chapter reviews the evidence for a link between functional dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection from three angles. In the section on pathophysiology, we evaluate how H. pylori could theoretically produce dyspeptic symptoms: many mechanisms can be proposed. In the discussion on epidemiology, we evaluate possible associations between the occurrence of symptoms and infection. Here, many studies claiming a coincidence or chronological sequence of infection and symptoms are criticized because of their poor design. In the section on the improvement of functional dyspepsia by the treatment of H. pylori infection, the conclusion is reached that if such an effect occurs at all--which is unlikely--it is very weak. The controversy on the link between H. pylori infection and functional dyspepsia is presently ongoing. Some authors are still trying to save an elegant concept that once looked so plausible but now has the facts against it.