Pseudodominant inheritance of DFNB1 deafness due to the common 35delG mutation

Clinical Impact of Genetic Diagnosis of Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults

HYPOTHESIS

Adult genetic sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) may be underestimated.

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of genetic hearing loss is challenging, given its extreme genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, particularly in adulthood. This study evaluated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in the etiological diagnosis of adult-onset SNHL.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adults (>16 yr old) with SNHL were recruited at the Otolaryngology Department at Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (Spain). Environmental factors, acoustic trauma, endolymphatic hydrops, and age-related hearing loss were excluding criteria. An NGS gene panel was used, including 196 genes (OTOgenics v3) or 229 genes (OTOgenics v4) related to syndromic and nonsyndromic hearing loss.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were included in the study (average age at the onset of SNHL, 41 yr). Fifteen pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants considered to be causative were found in 15 patients (23% diagnostic yield) in TECTA (4), KCNQ4 (3), GJB2 (2), ACTG1 (1), COL2A1 (1), COCH (1), COCH/COL2A1 (1), STRC (1), and ABHD12 (1). Three patients had syndromic associations (20% of patients with genetic diagnosis) that had not been previously diagnosed (two Stickler type I and one polyneuropathy, hearing loss, ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa, cataract syndrome). Seven variants of unknown significance were found in COL11A1 (1), GSMDE (2), DNTM1 (1), SOX10 (1), EYA4 (1), and TECTA (1).

CONCLUSION

NGS gene panels can provide diagnostic yields greater than 20% for adult SNHL, with a significant proportion of variant of unknown significance that could potentially contribute to increasing diagnostic output. Identifying a genetic cause enables genetic counseling, provides prognostic information and can reveal unrecognized syndromes contributing to an accurate management of their associated manifestations.

Molecular diagnosis of hearing loss

This unit discusses an approach to identifying a genetic cause in an individual with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Two protocols are presented, including a full-gene sequencing assay to identify mutations in the GJB2 gene encoding the connexin 26 protein. Mutations in the GJB2 gene represent the most common cause of congenital hearing loss. In addition, a protocol to detect the presence of a 342-kb deletion that includes a portion of the GJB6 gene is presented. The GJB6-D13S1830 deletion, in homozygosity or in combination with a single GJB2 mutation, causes hearing loss. In addition to the two protocols presented, the Strategic Planning section presents a discussion of a decision-making process that can be used to begin determining which gene(s) to test for in a patient presenting with nonsyndromic hearing loss. This task can be quite challenging, with the suspected involvement of over 90 genes.

A benign congenital myopathy in an inbred Samaritan family

We describe a novel form of myopathy in a mother and her two daughters from an inbred Samaritan family. The patients displayed severe neonatal hypotonia, lethargy and dysmorphic features. Motor milestones were delayed; however, the hypotonia and muscle weakness gradually improved during the first 2 years of life and independent walking was achieved by 18 months. The mother at the age of 23 years shows myopathic facies and minimal proximal weakness. Her intelligence is normal. Her muscle biopsy revealed central nuclei and disruption of the intermyofibrillary network with moth eaten and spiral fibers. Mutations in SMN, MTM1 and the myotonic dystrophy genes were excluded. We suggest this is a new benign form of congenital myopathy. Inheritance is probably autosomal recessive.

Exploring the clinical and epidemiological complexity of GJB2-linked deafness

GJB2 mutation analysis was performed in 179 unrelated subjects with sporadic or familial hearing loss (HL). Among 57 families, 18 showed a vertical transmission of HL, the disease being present in two or three generations. Besides 155 nonsyndromic cases, 24 patients presenting with extra-auditory clinical signs were included in the molecular study. GJB2 mutation analysis was also performed in 19 subjects with an anamnestic history of perinatal risks factors for acquired HL. The 35delG mutation accounted for 22.1% of analyzed chromosomes in sporadic cases and 39.4% in familial cases; 35delG prevalence reached 41% in autosomal recessive and 44.4% in pseudodominant pedigrees. Two novel GJB2 mutations were identified in compound heterozygosity with 35delG allele (D159V, 284ins/dup[CACGT]). Two 35delG homozygous subjects were identified among HL cases classified as environmental in origin. Four patients 35delG heterozygous (35delG/V95M, 35delG/L90P, 35delG/167delT, and 35delG/?) and two homozygous presented with extra-auditory clinical signs involving different organs (skin, vascular system, hemopoietic lineages, and thyroid). In a high proportion of 35delG heterozygous HL patients (52%), no second GJB2 mutation was detected. The reported data highlight the complexity of the genetic epidemiology of GJB2-linked deafness, further enlarging the spectrum of situations in which GJB2 mutation analysis should be performed. The presence of extra-auditory signs in a significant portion of GJB2-mutated patients suggests the possibility that GJB2 loss of function could contribute to clinical phenotypes presenting in association with deafness. This hypothesis deserves further investigation. The failure to identify a presumed partnering GJB2 mutation in a high proportion of deaf patients remains a challenging problem to be clarified.

Prevalence of GJB2 mutations in prelingual deafness in the Greek population

OBJECTIVE

Mutations in the gene encoding the gap junction protein connexin 26 (GJB2) have been shown as a major contributor to prelingual, sensorineural, nonsyndromic, recessive deafness. One specific mutation, 35delG, has accounted for the majority of the mutations detected in the GJB2 gene in Caucasian populations. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence and spectrum of GJB2 mutations in prelingual deafness in the Greek population.

METHODS

In a collaboration with the major referral centers for childhood deafness in Greece, patients were examined by an extensive questionnaire to exclude syndromic forms and environmental causes of deafness and by allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of the 35delG mutation. Patients heterozygous for the 35delG mutation were further analyzed by direct genomic sequencing of the coding region of the GJB2 gene.

RESULTS

The 35delG mutation was found in 42.2% of the chromosomes in 45 familial cases of prelingual, nonsyndromic deafness (18 homozygotes and 2 heterozygotes) and in 30.6% of the chromosomes in 165 sporadic cases (45 homozygotes and 11 heterozygotes). Direct genomic sequencing in heterozygous patients revealed the L90P (2 alleles), W24X (2 alleles), R184P (2 alleles), and 291insA (1 allele) mutations.

CONCLUSION

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are responsible for about one third of prelingual, sensorineural, nonsyndromic deafness in the Greek population, and allele-specific PCR is an easy screening method for the common 35delG mutation.

Evidence for pseudodominant inheritance of atrichia with papular lesions

Atrichia with papular lesions is a rare form of total alopecia, in which mutations in the hairless gene have been shown to underlie the phenotype. In the literature to date, atrichia with papular lesions has generally been reported to be inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. A few rare cases exist, however, in which parent-to-child transmission of atrichia with papular lesions has been documented. In this study, further investigations were carried out into the molecular basis of atrichia with papular lesions in a family with mother-to-son transmission by searching for mutations in the human hairless gene. Specific ally, we wanted to determine whether this case truly represented an example of dominantly inherited atrichia with papular lesions, or whether another mode of inheritance might be responsible for the disorder in this kindred. Pseudodominant inheritance, for example, occurs when an individual with a known recessive disorder has a clinically unaffected partner, but then unexpectedly gives birth to children who are affected with the same recessive disorder as the affected parent, and can easily be distinguished from classical dominant inheritance with molecular diagnosis and haplotype analysis. In the family reported here, we have determined that both the mother and son are, in fact, homozygous for a novel mutation in the hairless gene, R33X. We provide the first evidence for pseudodominant inheritance in atrichia with papular lesions, and at the same time extend our knowledge of pathogenetic mutations in the human hairless gene. Importantly, this information allows revisions in genetic counseling for risk of transmission for individuals in the family, previously impossible in the absence of knowing the genetic basis of atrichia with papular lesions in this unusual kindred.