A novel dominant missense mutation--D179N--in the GJB2 gene (Connexin 26) associated with non-syndromic hearing loss

Functional Consequences of Pathogenic Variants of the GJB2 Gene (Cx26) Localized in Different Cx26 Domains

One of the most common forms of genetic deafness has been predominantly associated with pathogenic variants in the GJB2 gene, encoding transmembrane protein connexin 26 (Cx26). The Cx26 molecule consists of an N-terminal domain (NT), four transmembrane domains (TM1-TM4), two extracellular loops (EL1 and EL2), a cytoplasmic loop, and a C-terminus (CT). Pathogenic variants in the GJB2 gene, resulting in amino acid substitutions scattered across the Cx26 domains, lead to a variety of clinical outcomes, including the most common non-syndromic autosomal recessive deafness (DFNB1A), autosomal dominant deafness (DFNA3A), as well as syndromic forms combining hearing loss and skin disorders. However, for rare and poorly documented variants, information on the mode of inheritance is often lacking. Numerous in vitro studies have been conducted to elucidate the functional consequences of pathogenic GJB2 variants leading to amino acid substitutions in different domains of Cx26 protein. In this work, we summarized all available data on a mode of inheritance of pathogenic GJB2 variants leading to amino acid substitutions and reviewed published information on their functional effects, with an emphasis on their localization in certain Cx26 domains.

Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Phenotypes of GJB2 Missense Variants

The GJB2 gene is the most common gene responsible for hearing loss (HL) worldwide, and missense variants are the most abundant type. GJB2 pathogenic missense variants cause nonsyndromic HL (autosomal recessive and dominant) and syndromic HL combined with skin diseases. However, the mechanism by which these different missense variants cause the different phenotypes is unknown. Over 2/3 of the GJB2 missense variants have yet to be functionally studied and are currently classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Based on these functionally determined missense variants, we reviewed the clinical phenotypes and investigated the molecular mechanisms that affected hemichannel and gap junction functions, including connexin biosynthesis, trafficking, oligomerization into connexons, permeability, and interactions between other coexpressed connexins. We predict that all possible GJB2 missense variants will be described in the future by deep mutational scanning technology and optimizing computational models. Therefore, the mechanisms by which different missense variants cause different phenotypes will be fully elucidated.

Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Post-lingual and/or Milder Hearing Loss for the Patients With the GJB2 c.235delC Homozygous Mutation

Objective

To report the phenotypic heterogeneity of GJB2 c.235delC homozygotes associated with post-lingual and/or milder hearing loss, and explore the possible mechanism of these unconditional phenotypes.

Methods

Mutation screening of GJB2 was performed on all ascertained members from Family 1006983 and three sporadic patients by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and Sanger sequencing. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was successively performed on some of the affected members and normal controls from Family 1006983 to explore additional possible genetic codes. Reverse transcriptase–quantitative PCR was conducted to test the expression of Connexin30.

Results

We identified a Chinese autosomal recessive hearing loss family with the GJB2 c.235delC homozygous mutation, affected members from which had post-lingual moderate to profound hearing impairment, and three sporadic patients with post-lingual moderate hearing impairment, instead of congenital profound hearing loss. NGS showed no other particular variants. Overexpression of Connexin30 in some of these cases was verified.

Conclusion

Post-lingual and/or moderate hearing impairment phenotypes of GJB2 c.235delC homozygotes are not the most common phenotype, revealing the heterogeneity of GJB2 pathogenic mutations. To determine the possible mechanism that rescues part of the hearing or postpones onset age of these cases, more cases are required to confirm both Connexin30 overexpression and the existence of modifier genes.

Connexin-46/50 in a dynamic lipid environment resolved by CryoEM at 1.9 Å

Gap junctions establish direct pathways for cells to transfer metabolic and electrical messages. The local lipid environment is known to affect the structure, stability and intercellular channel activity of gap junctions; however, the molecular basis for these effects remains unknown. Here, we incorporate native connexin-46/50 (Cx46/50) intercellular channels into a dual lipid nanodisc system, mimicking a native cell-to-cell junction. Structural characterization by CryoEM reveals a lipid-induced stabilization to the channel, resulting in a 3D reconstruction at 1.9 Å resolution. Together with all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, it is shown that Cx46/50 in turn imparts long-range stabilization to the dynamic local lipid environment that is specific to the extracellular lipid leaflet. In addition, ~400 water molecules are resolved in the CryoEM map, localized throughout the intercellular permeation pathway and contributing to the channel architecture. These results illustrate how the aqueous-lipid environment is integrated with the architectural stability, structure and function of gap junction communication channels.

Calcium interactions with Cx26 hemmichannel: Spatial association between MD simulations biding sites and variant pathogenicity

Connexinophaties are a collective of diseases related to connexin channels and hemichannels. In particular many Cx26 alterations are strongly associated to human deafness. Calcium plays an important role on this structures regulation. Here, using calcium as a probe, extensive atomistic Molecular Dynamics simulations were performed on the Cx26 hemichannel embedded in a lipid bilayer. Exploring different initial conditions and calcium concentration, simulation reached ∼4 μs. Several analysis were carried out in order to reveal the calcium distribution and localization, such as electron density profiles, density maps and distance time evolution, which is directly associated to the interaction energy. Specific amino acid interactions with calcium and their stability were capture within this context. Few of these sites such as, GLU42, GLU47, GLY45 and ASP50, were already suggested in the literature. Besides, we identified novel calcium biding sites: ASP2, ASP117, ASP159, GLU114, GLU119, GLU120 and VAL226. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that these sites are reported within this context. Furthermore, since various pathologies involving the Cx26 hemichannel are associated with pathogenic variants in the corresponding CJB2 gene, using ClinVar, we were able to spatially associate the 3D positions of the identified calcium binding sites within the framework of this work with reported pathogenic variants in the CJB2 gene. This study presents a first step on finding associations between molecular features and pathological variants of the Cx26 hemichannel.

Crucial motifs and residues in the extracellular loops influence the formation and specificity of connexin docking

Most of the early studies on gap junction (GJ) channel function and docking compatibility were on rodent connexins, while recent research on GJ channels gradually shifted from rodent to human connexins largely due to the fact that mutations in many human connexin genes are found to associate with inherited human diseases. The studies on human connexins have revealed some key differences from those found in rodents, calling for a comprehensive characterization of human GJ channels. Functional studies revealed that docking and formation of functional GJ channels between two hemichannels are possible only between docking-compatible connexins. Two groups of docking-compatible rodent connexins have been identified. Compatibility is believed to be due to their amino acid residue differences at the extracellular loop domains (E1 and E2). Sequence alignment of the E1 and E2 domains of all connexins known to make GJs revealed that they are highly conserved and show high sequence identity with human Cx26, which is the only connexin with near atomic resolution GJ structure. We hypothesize that different connexins have a similar structure as that of Cx26 at the E1 and E2 domains and use the corresponding residues in their E1 and E2 domains for docking. Based on the Cx26 GJ structure and sequence analysis of well-studied connexins, we propose that the E1-E1 docking interactions are staggered with each E1 interacting with two E1s on the docked connexon. The putative E1 docking residues are conserved in both docking-compatible and -incompatible connexins, indicating that E1 does not likely serve a role in docking compatibility. However, in the case of E2-E2 docking interactions, the putative docking residues are only conserved within the docking-compatible connexins, suggesting the E2 is likely to serve the function of docking compatibility. Docking compatibility studies on human connexins have attracted a lot of attention due to the fact that putative docking residues are mutational hotspots for several connexin-linked human diseases. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Gap Junction Proteins edited by Jean Claude Herve.

Engineered Cx26 variants established functional heterotypic Cx26/Cx43 and Cx26/Cx40 gap junction channels

Gap junction (GJ) channels mediate direct intercellular communication and are composed of two docked hemichannels (connexin oligomers). It is well documented that the docking and formation of GJs are possible only between compatible hemichannels (or connexins). The mechanisms of heterotypic docking compatibility are not fully clear. We aligned the protein sequences of docking-compatible and -incompatible connexins with that of connexin26 (Cx26). We found that two docking hydrogen bond (HB)-forming residues on the second extracellular domain (E2) of Cx26 and their equivalent residues are well conserved within docking-compatible connexins, but different between docking-incompatible connexins. Replacing one or both of these residues of Cx26 into the corresponding residues in the docking incompatible connexins (K168V, N176H or K168V-N176H) increased the formation of morphological and functional heterotypic GJs with connexin43 (Cx43) or connexin40 (Cx40), indicating that these two residues are important for docking incompatibility between Cx26 and these connexins. Our homology structure models predict that both HBs and hydrophobic interactions at the E2 docking interface are important docking mechanisms in heterotypic Cx26 K168V-N176H/Cx43 GJs and probably other docking compatible connexins. Revealing the key residues and mechanisms of heterotypic docking compatibility will assist us in understanding why these putative docking residues are hotspots of disease-linked mutants.

New and rare GJB2 alleles in patients with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing impairment: a genotype/auditory phenotype correlation

AIM

The aim of the study is to report the new and rare GJB2 variants identified in individuals with nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing impairment (HI) in a retrospective study based on 498 patients referred to the Otolaryngology and Medical Genetics Units of the Modena University Hospital, Italy, with the purpose of building new genotype/auditory phenotype correlations for the GJB2 gene.

RESULTS

A total of eight variants identified in HI patients under study were considered rare for their frequency below 1% in the general population and in the HI databases. Of those, four (I20T, V95M, N206S, c.-22-2A>C) were in compound heterozygosity with known mutations resulting in a range of phenotypes from mild to profound, whereas four (W3R, C218Y, K221N, c.-22-6T>C) were found in simple heterozygosity (for those only in silico prediction of pathogenicity was possible due to the absence of a second GJB2 or GJB6 mutation).

CONCLUSION

Based on patients' phenotype, reported frequency, and in silico prediction analysis, we suggest the prognostic value of eight rare and new GJB2 alleles, which may be of help to the clinician in counseling patients who carry such variants.

Extracellular domains play different roles in gap junction formation and docking compatibility

GJ (gap junction) channels mediate direct intercellular communication and play an important role in many physiological processes. Six connexins oligomerize to form a hemichannel and two hemichannels dock together end-to-end to form a GJ channel. Connexin extracellular domains (E1 and E2) have been shown to be important for the docking, but the molecular mechanisms behind the docking and formation of GJ channels are not clear. Recent developments in atomic GJ structure and functional studies on a series of connexin mutants revealed that E1 and E2 are likely to play different roles in the docking. Non-covalent interactions at the docking interface, including hydrogen bonds, are predicted to form between interdocked extracellular domains. Protein sequence alignment analysis on the docking compatible/incompatible connexins indicate that the E1 domain is important for the formation of the GJ channel and the E2 domain is important in the docking compatibility in heterotypic channels. Interestingly, the hydrogen-bond forming or equivalent residues in both E1 and E2 domains are mutational hot spots for connexin-linked human diseases. Understanding the molecular mechanisms of GJ docking can assist us to develop novel strategies in rescuing the disease-linked connexin mutants.

A mechanism of gap junction docking revealed by functional rescue of a human-disease-linked connexin mutant

Gap junctions are unique intercellular channels formed by the proper docking of two hemichannels from adjacent cells. Each hemichannel is a hexamer of connexins (Cxs) - the gap junction subunits, which are encoded by 21 homologous genes in the human genome. The docking of two hemichannels to form a functional gap junction channel is only possible between compatible Cxs, but the underlying molecular mechanism is unclear. On the basis of the crystal structure of the Cx26 gap junction, we developed homology models for homotypic and heterotypic channels from Cx32 and/or Cx26; these models predict six hydrogen bonds at the docking interface of each pair of the second extracellular domain (E2). A Cx32 mutation N175H and a human-disease-linked mutant N175D were predicted to lose the majority of the hydrogen bonds at the E2 docking-interface; experimentally both mutations failed to form morphological and functional gap junctions. To restore the lost hydrogen bonds, two complementary Cx26 mutants - K168V and K168A were designed to pair with the Cx32 mutants. When docked with Cx26K168V or K168A, the Cx32N175H mutant was successfully rescued morphologically and functionally in forming gap junction channels, but not Cx32 mutant N175Y. By testing more homotypic and heterotypic Cx32 and/or Cx26 mutant combinations, it is revealed that a minimum of four hydrogen bonds at each E2-docking interface are required for proper docking and functional channel formation between Cx26 and Cx32 hemichannels. Interestingly, the disease-linked Cx32N175D could be rescued by Cx26D179N, which restored five hydrogen bonds at the E2-docking interface. Our findings not only provide a mechanism for gap junction docking for Cx26 and Cx32 hemichannels, but also a potential therapeutic strategy for gap junction channelopathies.

Identification of a p.R143Q dominant mutation in the gap junction beta-2 gene in three Chinese patients with different hearing phenotypes

CONCLUSIONS

p.R143Q mutation in GJB2 can cause mild to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Although not common in Chinese patients with hearing loss, it is important to identify the specific phenotype and genotype correlations of the dominant mutation in GJB2.

OBJECTIVE

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are the most common cause of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss. A few mutations in GJB2 have also been reported to cause dominant nonsyndromic or syndromic hearing loss. However, dominant mutation in GJB2 is not common in Chinese populations.

METHODS

Three patients with hearing impairment from Chinese families are reported here. Temporal CT scan, complete physical (including skin and hair) and otoscopic examinations, and an audiological study, including tympanometry, auditory brainstem response (ABR), auditory steady-state response (ASSR), and 40 Hz auditory event-related potential (40 Hz-AERP), were carried out. The two exons of GJB2, the coding exons of SLC26A4, and mitochondrial 12S rRNA were sequenced.

RESULTS

Sequencing of GJB2 in two patients showed a heterozygous c.428G>A (p.R143Q) mutation, and the third patient was identified with c.299delAT and c.428G>A compound heterozygous mutation. Sequence analysis of the coding exons of SLC26A4 and mitochondrial 12S rRNA was performed but no sequence aberration or deletion was found.

Molecular diagnosis of hearing loss

This unit discusses an approach to identifying a genetic etiology in an individual with nonsyndromic hearing loss. The unit begins with a discussion of the decision-making process that can be used to determine whether specific genes and/or a large gene panel should be used for molecular diagnosis of a patient presenting with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Next, two protocols are presented: (1) a full gene-sequencing assay to identify mutations in the GJB2 gene (encoding connexin 26), the most common cause of congenital hearing loss, and (2) an assay to detect the presence of the GJB6-D13S1830 deletion, a 342-kb deletion that causes hearing loss in homozygosity or in combination with a single GJB2 mutation. Finally, the unit ends with a strategy for determining the clinical significance of the test results, which can be challenging given the extensive genetic heterogeneity associated with hearing loss.

De novo dominant mutation of GJB2 in two Chinese families with nonsyndromic hearing loss

BACKGROUND

Mutations in the GJB2 gene are the most common cause of nonsyndromic autosomal recessive sensorineural hearing loss. A few mutations in GJB2 have also been reported to cause dominant nonsyndromic or syndromic hearing loss. However, de novo or dominant mutation in GJB2 is not common in Chinese populations.

METHODS

Two probands with hearing impairment from unrelated Chinese families are reported here. Temporal CT scan, complete physical (including skin and hair) and otoscopic examinations, and an audiological study, including tympanometry, auditory brainstem response (ABR), auditory steady-state response (ASSR), and 40Hz-auditory event-related potential (40 Hz-AERP), were carried out. The two exons of GJB2, the coding exons of SLC26A4, and mitochondrial 12S rRNA were sequenced.

RESULTS

Sequencing of GJB2 in the two cases showed a heterozygous c.551G>A(p.R184Q) mutation, which was not found in other family members. Additionally, no other mutation in GJB2 was identified in the two family members. Paternity was confirmed by genotype analysis of 15 informative short tandem repeats (STRs) from the chromosomes. Sequence analysis of the coding exons of SLC26A4 and mitochondrial 12S rRNA was performed but no sequence aberration or deletion was found.

CONCLUSIONS

A de novo GJB2 p.R184Q mutation can cause severe-to-profound bilateral sensorineural hearing impairment. Although not common in Chinese patients with hearing loss, it is important to identify the specific phenotype and genotype correlations of the de novo dominant mutation in GJB2.

Asparagine 175 of connexin32 is a critical residue for docking and forming functional heterotypic gap junction channels with connexin26

The gap junction channel is formed by proper docking of two hemichannels. Depending on the connexin(s) in the hemichannels, homotypic and heterotypic gap junction channels can be formed. Previous studies suggest that the extracellular loop 2 (E2) is an important molecular domain for heterotypic compatibility. Based on the crystal structure of the Cx26 gap junction channel and homology models of heterotypic channels, we analyzed docking selectivity for several hemichannel pairs and found that the hydrogen bonds between E2 domains are conserved in a group of heterotypically compatible hemichannels, including Cx26 and Cx32 hemichannels. According to our model analysis, Cx32N175Y mutant destroys three hydrogen bonds in the E2-E2 interactions due to steric hindrance at the heterotypic docking interface, which makes it unlikely to dock with the Cx26 hemichannel properly. Our experimental data showed that Cx26-red fluorescent protein (RFP) and Cx32-GFP were able to traffic to cell-cell interfaces forming gap junction plaques and functional channels in transfected HeLa/N2A cells. However, Cx32N175Y-GFP exhibited mostly intracellular distribution and was occasionally observed in cell-cell junctions. Double patch clamp analysis demonstrated that Cx32N175Y did not form functional homotypic channels, and dye uptake assay indicated that Cx32N175Y could form hemichannels on the cell surface similar to wild-type Cx32. When Cx32N175Y-GFP- and Cx26-RFP-transfected cells were co-cultured, no colocalization was found at the cell-cell junctions between Cx32N175Y-GFP- and Cx26-RFP-expressing cells; also, no functional Cx32N175Y-GFP/Cx26-RFP heterotypic channels were identified. Both our modeling and experimental data suggest that Asn(175) of Cx32 is a critical residue for heterotypic docking and functional gap junction channel formation between the Cx32 and Cx26 hemichannels.

Phenotypes of Two Dutch DFNA3 Families with Mutations in GJB2

Objectives:

We describe the phenotype of 2 Dutch DFNA3 families with mutations in the GJB2 gene.

Methods:

Two patients from family 1 and one isolated patient from family 2 were studied. The audiometric examination consisted of pure tone and speech audiometry. Two patients underwent vestibular testing and high-resolution computed tomographic scanning of the temporal bone. Mutation analysis of GJB2 and GJB6 was performed.

Results:

All 3 patients had severe to profound sensorineural hearing impairment. Cochlear implantation was performed in 2 patients, and their phoneme recognition scores were good. Mutation analyses revealed a p. Arg184Gln mutation in GJB2 in family 1 and a p. Arg75Trp mutation in GJB2 in family 2. No mutations in GJB6 were identified. Vestibular function tests and computed tomographic scans yielded normal findings in the examined subjects.

Conclusions:

Severe to profound sensorineural hearing impairment was found in these DFNA3 patients, and was well rehabilitated with cochlear implantation. A thorough genotype-phenotype correlation is difficult because of the small number of affected patients and the limited clinical data of these patients. More clinical data on DFNA3 families need to be published in order to create a reliable and precise phenotype characterization.

Dominant Cx26 mutants associated with hearing loss have dominant-negative effects on wild type Cx26

Mutations in GJB2, the gene encoding the human gap junction protein connexin26 (Cx26), cause either non-syndromic hearing loss or syndromes affecting both hearing and skin. We have investigated whether dominant Cx26 mutants can interact physically with wild type Cx26. HeLa cells stably expressing wild type Cx26 were transiently transfected to co-express nine individual dominant Cx26 mutants; six associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (W44C, W44S, R143Q, D179N, R184Q, and C202F) and three associated with hearing loss and palmoplantar keratoderma (G59A, R75Q, and R75W). All mutants co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated with wild type Cx26, indicating that they interact physically, likely by forming admixed heteromeric/heterotypic channels. Furthermore, all nine mutants inhibited the transfer of calcein in cells stably expressing Cx26, demonstrating that they each have dominant effects on wild type Cx26. Taken together, these results show that dominant-negative effects of these Cx26 mutants likely contribute to the pathogenesis of hearing loss.

Dominant connexin26 mutants associated with human hearing loss have trans-dominant effects on connexin30

Dominant mutations in GJB2, the gene encoding the human gap junction protein connexin26 (Cx26), cause hearing loss. We investigated whether dominant Cx26 mutants interact directly with Cx30. HeLa cells stably expressing nine dominant Cx26 mutants, six associated with non-syndromic hearing loss (W44C, W44S, R143Q, D179N, R184Q and C202F) and three associated with hearing loss and palmoplantar keratoderma (G59A, R75Q and R75W), individually or together with Cx30, were analyzed by immunocytochemistry, co-immunoprecipitation, and functional assays (scrape-loading and/or fluorescence recovery after photobleaching). When expressed alone, all mutants formed gap junction plaques, but with impaired intercellular dye transfer. When expressed with Cx30, all mutants co-localized and co-immunoprecipitated with Cx30, indicating they likely co-assembled into heteromers. Furthermore, 8/9 Cx26 mutants inhibited the transfer of neurobiotin or calcein, indicating that these Cx26 mutants have trans-dominant effects on Cx30, an effect that may contribute to the pathogenesis of hearing loss.

Analysis of the GJB2 and GJB6 genes in Italian patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss: frequencies, novel mutations, genotypes, and degree of hearing loss

Mutations in the GJB2 gene, which encodes the gap-junction protein connexin 26, are the most common cause of nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) and account for about 32% of cases. We analyzed 734 patients and identified mutations in 474/1468 chromosomes. Thirty-six different mutations and five polymorphisms were found in 269 NSHL subjects. Our data confirm 35delG as the most frequent GJB2 mutation in the Italian population, accounting for about 68% of all the mutated GJB2 alleles analyzed. We also identified two novel variants: the V156I mutation and the C>A change at nucleotide 684 in the 3'UTR of the gene. The GJB6 gene deletion, del(GJB6-D13S1830), which can cause HL in combination with GJB2 mutations in trans, was identified in three patients, while the del(GJB6-D13S1854) was not observed in our cohort of patients. We collected audiometric data from 200 patients with biallelic DFNB1 mutations or with dominant mutation in GJB2 to determine the degree of HL to correlate the genotypes with the audiological phenotypes.

Diverse deafness mechanisms of connexin mutations revealed by studies using in vitro approaches and mouse models

Mutations in connexins (Cxs), the constitutive protein subunits of gap junction (GJ) intercellular channels, are one of the most common human genetic defects that cause severe prelingual non-syndromic hearing impairments. Many subtypes of Cxs (e.g., Cxs 26, 29, 30, 31, 43) and pannexins (Panxs) are expressed in the cochlea where they contribute to the formation of a GJ-based intercellular communication network. Cx26 and Cx30 are the predominant cochlear Cxs and they co-assemble in most GJ plaques to form hybrid GJs. The cellular localization of specific Cx subtypes provides a basis for understanding the molecular structure of GJs and hemichannels in the cochlea. Information about the interactions among the various co-assembled Cx partners is critical to appreciate the functional consequences of various types of genetic mutations. In vitro studies of reconstituted GJs in cell lines have yielded surprisingly heterogeneous mechanisms of dysfunction caused by various Cx mutations. Availability of multiple lines of Cx-mutant mouse models has provided some insight into the pathogenesis processes in the cochlea of deaf mice. Here we summarize recent advances in understanding the structure and function of cochlear GJs and give a critical review of current findings obtained from both in vitro studies and mouse models on the mechanisms of Cx mutations that lead to cell death in the cochlea and hearing loss.

A novel missense mutation in the second extracellular domain of GJB2, p.Ser183Phe, causes a syndrome of focal palmoplantar keratoderma with deafness

Gap junctions, which consist of connexins, are intercellular channels that mediate rapid intercellular communication. In the skin, connexins are involved in the regulation of epidermal growth and differentiation. GJB2 encodes connexin26, which is an important skin-expressed gap junction protein. Mutations in GJB2 cause a wide variety of unique disorders, but despite extensive research, their mechanisms of action are poorly understood. The identification of novel diseases caused by mutations in GJB2 may help to illuminate the genotype-phenotype correlation and elucidate the function of different regions of the protein. Here, we report the first account of a family with a GJB2 missense mutation in the second extracellular domain (p.Ser183Phe) that causes skin abnormalities in addition to sensorineural hearing loss. Using fluorescent connexin26-EGFP fusion proteins, we showed that the mutation induces a partial protein transport defect that cannot be rescued by wild-type protein. Dye-transfer experiments using a parachute assay revealed channel functionality. Although p.Ser183Phe affects the second extracellular domain, mutations in the first extracellular domain also lead to focal palmoplantar keratoderma and likewise perturb protein transport in a dominant-negative manner. Therefore, we hypothesize that focal palmoplantar keratoderma in gap junction skin disease may be specifically associated with connexin trafficking defects as well as with mutations affecting its extracellular domains, thus broadening the spectrum of GJB2-associated diseases.

Molecular diagnosis of hearing loss

This unit discusses an approach to identifying a genetic cause in an individual with nonsyndromic hearing loss. Two protocols are presented, including a full-gene sequencing assay to identify mutations in the GJB2 gene encoding the connexin 26 protein. Mutations in the GJB2 gene represent the most common cause of congenital hearing loss. In addition, a protocol to detect the presence of a 342-kb deletion that includes a portion of the GJB6 gene is presented. The GJB6-D13S1830 deletion, in homozygosity or in combination with a single GJB2 mutation, causes hearing loss. In addition to the two protocols presented, the Strategic Planning section presents a discussion of a decision-making process that can be used to begin determining which gene(s) to test for in a patient presenting with nonsyndromic hearing loss. This task can be quite challenging, with the suspected involvement of over 90 genes.

Compound heterozygosity for dominant and recessive GJB2 mutations: effect on phenotype and review of the literature

Mutations in GJB2 (which encodes the gap-junction protein connexin 26) are the most common cause of genetic deafness in many populations. To date, more than 100 deafness-causing mutations have been described in this gene. The majority of these mutations are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, but approximately 19 GJB2 mutations have been associated with dominantly inherited hearing loss. One, W44C, was first identified in two families from France. We subsequently described a family in the United States with the same mutation. In these families, W44C segregates with a dominantly inherited, early-onset, progressive, sensorineural deafness that is worse in the high frequencies. Since that report, we have tested additional family members and identified two siblings who are compound heterozygous for the W44C and K15T mutations. Their father, the original proband, is heterozygous for the dominant W44C mutation, and their mother is compound heterozygous for two recessively inherited mutations, K15T and 35delG. Both children have a profound, sensorineural deafness and use manual communication, in contrast to their parents and other relatives whose hearing losses are less severe and who can communicate orally. The difference in phenotype may be a result of the disruption of different functions of the gap-junction protein by the two mutations, which have an additive effect.

A new de novo missense mutation in connexin 26 in a sporadic case of nonsyndromic deafness

OBJECTIVES

Mutations in the GJB2 gene, encoding Connexin 26, can cause nonsyndromic recessive deafness or dominant hearing loss (HL) with or without keratoderma. The objective was to perform a molecular evaluation to establish the inherited pattern of deafness in the sporadic cases afferent to our center.

METHODS

The subject was a 2-year-old Italian girl with nonsyndromic early onset HL. We performed DNA sequencing of the GJB2 gene and deletion analysis of the GJB6 gene in all family members.

RESULTS

Direct sequencing of the gene showed a heterozygous C-->G transition at nucleotide 172 resulting in a proline to alanine amino acid substitution at codon 58 (P58A). The analyses indicate that the P58A mutation appeared de novo in the proband with a possible dominant effect.

CONCLUSIONS

This mutation occurs in the first extracellular domain (EC1), which seems to be very important for connexon-connexon interaction and for the control of voltage gating of the channel. The de novo occurrence of an EC1 mutation in a sporadic case of deafness is consistent with the assumption that P58A can cause dominant HL.

Mutations inGJB2,GJB6, and mitochondrial DNA are rare in African American and Caribbean Hispanic individuals with hearing impairment

Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing impairment (ARNSHI) comprises 80% of familial hearing loss cases. Approximately half result from mutations in the connexin 26 (Cx26) gene, GJB2, in Caucasian populations. Heterozygous mutations in GJB2 occasionally co-occur with a deletion of part of GJB6 (connexin 30; Cx30). It is estimated that approximately 1% of deafness is maternally inherited, due to mutations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). Few studies have focused on the frequency of mutations in connexins or mtDNA in African American (AA) and Caribbean Hispanic (CH) admixture populations. In this study, we performed bidirectional sequencing of the GJB2 gene and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) screening for the common GJB6 deletion, as well as PCR/RFLP analysis for three mutations in mtDNA (A1555G, A3243G, A7445G), in 109 predominantly simplex AA and CH individuals. Variations found were a 101T > C (M34T; 1/101 cases), 109G > A (V37I; 1/101), 35delG (mutation; 4/101, (3/4) of non-AA/CH ethnicity), 167delT (mutation; 1/101), 139G > T (mutation; E47X; 1/101 homozygote, consanguineous), -15C > T (1/101), 79G > A (V27I; 9/101), 380G > A (R127H; 4/101; Guyana, India, Pakistan ethnicity), 670A > C (Indeterminate; K224Q; 1/101), 503A > G (novel; K168R; 3/101) and 684C > A (novel; 1/101). All but one of the AA and CH patients had monoallelic variations. There were no hemizygous GJB6 deletions in those with monoallelic GJB2 variations. We also did not identify any patients with the three mutations in mtDNA. Bidirectional sequencing of the GJB2 gene was performed in 187 AA and Hispanic healthy individuals. Our results reveal that GJB2 mutations, GJB6 deletions, and mtDNA mutations may not be significant in these minority admixture populations.