T-cell recovery following marrow transplant: experience with delayed lymphocyte infusions to accelerate immune recovery or treat infectious problems

Improving cytomegalovirus-specific T cell reconstitution after haploidentical stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and delayed immune reconstitution (IR) remain serious obstacles for successful haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT). CMV-specific IR varied according to whether patients received manipulated/unmanipulated grafts or myeloablative/reduced intensity conditioning. CMV infection commonly occurs following impaired IR of T cell and its subsets. Here, we discuss the factors that influence IR based on currently available evidence. Adoptive transfer of donor T cells to improve CMV-specific IR is discussed. One should choose grafts from CMV-positive donors for transplant into CMV-positive recipients (D+/R+) because this will result in better IR than would grafts from CMV-negative donors (D−/R+). Stem cell source and donor age are other important factors. Posttransplant complications, including graft-versus-host disease and CMV infection, as well as their associated treatments, should also be considered. The effects of varying degrees of HLA disparity and conditioning regimens are more controversial. As many of these factors and strategies are considered in the setting of haplo-SCT, it is anticipated that haplo-SCT will continue to advance, further expanding our understanding of IR and CMV infection.

Clinical and immunologic outcomes following haplocompatible donor lymphocyte infusions

We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of 16 consecutive pediatric patients who received one or more G-CSF-mobilized donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) following a T-cell-depleted haplocompatible hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) to enhance immune recovery and/or treat an infection. The median time from HSCT to administration of first DLI was 12 weeks and the median dose of DLI administered was 3 x 10(4)/kg (range, 2.5-6 x 10(4)/kg). The incidence of Grade I-II acute GVHD was 19% (95% confidence interval (CI), 6-44%), and there were no cases of Grade III-IV acute GVHD. Chronic GVHD developed in 13% (95% CI, 2-37%) of patients. In surviving patients who did not undergo a second stem cell infusion, T-cell numbers and function increased to a protective level in a median of 3 months (range, 2-12.5 months) following the first DLI administration. In patients given DLI for treatment of an infection, 75% (95% CI, 46-92%) cleared their infection after a median of 9 weeks (range, 1-27 weeks). In patients with CMV infection, the development of CMV-specific T cells was observed following DLI. The 1-year overall survival following haplocompatible DLI was 71% (95% CI, 59-83%), with a median follow-up of 16 months from the first DLI.

Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator

BACKGROUND

This study reports on an evaluation of the ability of a cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) and the integral MNC computer software program to collect a variety of MNC subsets. The collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus for these MNC subsets was compared to that of another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter). The collected MNCs were also assayed ex vivo to determine if these cells remained functional.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Healthy volunteer blood donors were recruited to provide PBMNCs for the isolation of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, NK, and gammadelta+ cells and monocytes. Cells were collected with an Amicus (test arm; n = 16) or a CS-3000 Plus (control arm; n = 11) cell separator. Cells were counted on a flow cytometer and CEs were calculated. For functional studies, the Amicus-collected MNC data were compared to CS-3000 Plus historical data. Functional studies performed included surface antigen expression assays (CD8+), proliferation assays (CD4+ and CD8+ cells), NK cytotoxicity assays for K562 and HUVE cells, and E-selectin induction on endothelial cells through NK+ contact dependency. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from CD34+ cells collected on the Amicus, positively selected by the use of antibody-bound, magnetic bead technology, and then cultured ex vivo with a combination of growth factors to generate the DCs.

RESULTS

CEs were higher on the Amicus than on the CS-3000 Plus for CD3+ (68 vs. 54%), CD4+ (70 vs. 56%), CD8+ (68 vs. 52%), and CD19+ (60 vs. 48%) cells (p<0.05). For the two separators, CEs were equivalent for monocytes, NK+, and gammadelta+ cells. The Amicus separator collected significantly fewer platelets than did the CS-3000 Plus (p<0.00001). CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells proliferated normally. NK cells appropriately stimulated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells. Culture-generated DCs obtained by using Amicus-collected CD34+ cells expressed appropriate cell surface markers.

CONCLUSION

The Amicus separator is acceptable for the collection of PBMNC subsets. The device collects CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ T- and B-cell subsets with greater efficiency and collects MNCs with significantly fewer contaminating platelets than does the CS-3000 Plus. Cells collected on the Amicus are suitable for use in a variety of research and clinical immunobiologic studies.