The availability of all technical modalities for pediatric liver transplant programs

Living donor liver transplantation in children: a single North American center experience over two decades

Little data concerning hospital charges and long-term outcomes of LDLT in North American children according to transplant indications have been published. To compare outcomes of patient and graft survival and healthcare charges for LDLT for those with BA vs. other diagnoses (non-BA). A retrospective review of 52 children receiving 53 LDLT (38 BA and 14 non-BA) from 1992 to 2010 at our institution was performed. One-, five-, and 10-yr patient and graft survival data were comparable to national figures reported to UNOS. Average one-yr charges for recipients and donors were $242 849 for BA patients and $183 614 for non-BA (p = 0.074). BA patients were 1.23 ± 1.20 yr of age vs. 4.25 ± 5.02 for non-BA, p = 0.045. Examination of the total population of patients who were alive in 2010 in five chronological groupings showed that the crude five-yr survival rates were 1992-1995: 9/11 (82%); 1995-1997: 6/10 (60%); 1997-1999: 8/10 (80%); 1999-2001: 9/10 (90%); and 2001-2003: 7/7 (100%). Thus, examination of the clinical and financial data together over the entire period of the transplant program suggests that the dramatic improvement in patient survival was accomplished without a dramatic increase in indexed charges. All 53 donors survived, and only 10% had complications requiring hospitalization. LDLT in children results in excellent outcomes for patients and donors. Ways to lower costs and maximize graft outcome should be investigated.

Living Donor Liver Transplantation

A perception that living donor liver transplantation can be accomplished with an acceptable donor complication rate and recipient survival rate has led to the acceptance of living donor liver transplantation as a viable alternative to decreased deceased donor transplantation. Careful candidate evaluation and selection has been crucial to the success of this procedure. Advancements in the understanding of the lobar nature of the liver and of liver regeneration have advanced the surgical technique. Initial attempts at adult-to-adult donation utilized the left hepatic lobe, but now have evolved into use of the right hepatic lobe. Size matching is very important to successful graft function in the recipient. There is great concern regarding morbidity and mortality in donors. Biliary complications and infections continue to be among the most highly reported complications, although rates vary among centers and countries. Reports of single center complications have ranged from 9% to 67%. A survey of centers in the United States in 2003 reported complications of 10%. A series from our institution reported complications arising in 13 (33%) of 39 patients. A review focused on documenting donor deaths found 33 living liver donor deaths worldwide. The much publicized immediate postoperative mishap of 2002 that resulted in a donor’s death resulted in a drop in the utilization of living donor liver transplantation in the United States, from which this procedure has never fully recovered. The future development and expansion of living donor liver transplantation depends on open communication regarding donor complications and deaths. Close immediate postoperative monitoring and meticulous management will remain an essential aspect in limiting donor complications and deaths.

Live donor liver transplantation

With ever-increasing demand for liver replacement, supply of organs is the limiting factor and a significant number of patients die while waiting. Live donor liver transplantation has emerged as an important option for many patients, particularly small pediatric patients and those adults that are disadvantaged by the current deceased donor allocation system. Ideally there would be no need to subject perfectly healthy people in the prime of their lives to a potentially life-threatening operation to procure transplantable organs. Donor safety is imperative and cannot be compromised regardless of the implication for the intended recipient. The evolution of split liver transplantation is the basis upon which live donor transplantation has become possible. The live donor procedures are considerably more complex than whole organ decreased donor transplantation and there are unique considerations involved in the assessment of any specific recipient and donor. Donor selection and evaluation have become highly specialized. The critical issue of size matching is determined by both the actual size of the donor graft and the recipient as well as the degree of recipient portal hypertension. The outcomes after live donor liver transplantation have been at least comparable to those of deceased donor transplantation. Nevertheless, all efforts should be made to improve deceased donor donation so as to minimize the need for live donors. Transplant physicians, particularly surgeons, must take responsibility for regulating and overseeing these procedures.

Paediatric liver transplantation--a review based on 20 years of personal experience

The natural history of most liver diseases requiring liver replacement in children is well known, and the potential of this therapy has been ascertained regarding life expectancy, which currently exceeds 90% in the long term. The timing of liver transplantation must be anticipated, to reduce the physical, psychological and mental impact of chronic liver diseases. Several studies show evidence that the best long-term results with regard to patient and graft survival are obtained with grafts procured from relatively young donors. Since the shortage of post-mortem liver donors will most likely worsen, further development of live, related-donor transplantation can be expected. The main progress to come will concern immunosuppression, taking advantage of the immunological privilege of the liver. Protocols are under development for induction of operational tolerance.

Pediatric living donor liver transplantation

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyze the results of living donor in a pediatric liver transplantation program.

PATIENTS

Twenty-six living donor liver transplantations were performed in children from 0.5 to 14.8 years of age. The main indication was biliary atresia (72%) followed by tumors (2 hepatoblastomas and 1 hepatocarcinoma). Left lateral segments were used in 23 (1 transformed into a monosegment), 1 left lobe was used in 1, and right lobes were used in 2. Arterial reconstruction employed saphenous venous grafts in the first 3 cases and end-to-end anastomoses with a microsurgical technique in the following 22 cases.

RESULTS

There has been no major morbidity in the donors, with a median hospitalization of 6 days. Four grafts have been lost; 2 in the first 3 cases. In only 1 case, the graft loss was related to the procedure saphenous venous graft thrombosis). Early biliary complications were frequent (23%). Six month, 1 year, and 5 year graft and patient survival rates were 91%, 85%, and 85% and 100%, 96%, and 96%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Living donor liver transplantation is an excellent option for transplantation in children.

History of pediatric liver transplantation. Where are we coming from? Where do we stand?

The history of pediatric liver transplantation cannot be dissociated from one man, Thomas E. Starzl, whose pioneer efforts contributed more than anyone else to what has become a routinely successful clinical procedure. During the pre-cyclosporine era, the pediatric experience was confined nearly exclusively in Denver: first attempt in 1963, first success with survival beyond one year in 1967, cumulative experience with 84 pediatric cases in the pre-cyclosporine era (1967-1979) with a 2-year patient survival rate of 30%. The stampede for the development of other liver transplant centers came with the introduction of cyclosporine in the early eighties. Besides Pittsburgh, seven centers (Brussels, Cambridge and Hanover in Europe; Boston, Dallas, UCLA, Minneapolis in USA) had performed up to 1986 at least 20 pediatric liver transplants each with a long-term (>1 year) patient survival rate ranging between 57% and 83%. At the moment, a long-term patient survival rate in excess of 90% in elective patients -including infants - is commonly obtained in experienced centers. The shortage of size matched liver donors which was responsible for a high death rate on the cadaveric waiting list stimulated the development or technical innovations based on the segmental anatomy of the liver: reduced ('cutdown') liver graft, split graft and living liver transplantation. Challenging technical aspects in the recipient have been solved in order to reduce the incidence of surgical complications like outflow obstruction, arterial and portal thrombosis, and biliary problems. The indications of liver transplantation have been refined; regarding biliary atresia, which is the most frequent indication, a consensus has developed to propose a sequential strategy with a single attempt at hepatoportoenterostomy followed, when it fails, by liver transplantation. Some contra-indications accepted in the past are not currently valid with better understanding of the pathophysiology and/or increased clinical experience; such is the case of the hepatopulmonary syndrome. A major progress in preoperative management has been achieved through a multidisciplinary approach, particularly regarding nutrition and control of portal hypertension-related bleeding and ascites. Perioperatively, liver transplantation has derived benefit from the expertise of anesthetists managing babies with serious conditions and increased experience of the transplant surgeons regarding the knowledge of all the technical modalities, good strategy, technical skills and meticulous control of bleeding. It is well-recognized that children require more immunosuppression than adults. As in adults, the first breakthrough came with the introduction of cyclosporine which more than doubled the one-year patient survival rate. The next advance during the last decade was afforded by FK 506 - Tacrolimus which allows steroid withdrawal with the first year post-transplant in most patients. Besides its efficacy in reducing the incidence of rejection and absence of cosmetic side-effects, the steroid-sparing effect of Tacrolimus is of utmost importance to preserve the growth potential of children. The use of OKT-3 both for induction and treatment of rejection has been abandoned nearly universally because its use, cumulated with other immunosuppressants, resulted in a high incidence of lymphoproliferative disorder. In contrast, anti-IL2-receptor monoclonal antibodies, will most likely gain an increasing place in induction, with the availability of chimeric or humanized preparations. The side-effects of immunosuppression can endanger both the quality of life and the life expectancy; they are a special source of concern in pediatric recipients whose survival can be expected to be more than a few decades. Children would benefit most from the development of a marker able to identify the patients who have developed graft acceptance, allowing complete wearing of immunosuppression. Also they would benefit most from research protocols of tolerance induction. Since the vast majority of liver-transplanted children will have a reasonably normal life expectancy, the focus should be switched to their long-term rehabilitation and the assessment of their quality of life when they reach adulthood.

Is there still a need for living-related liver transplantation in children?

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare the value of split-liver transplantation (SLT) and living-related liver transplantation (LRT).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The concept of SLT results from the development of reduced-size transplantation. A further development of SLT, the in situ split technique, is derived from LRT, which itself marks the optimized outcome in terms of postoperative graft function and survival. The combination of SLT and LRT has abolished deaths on the waiting list, thus raising the question whether living donor liver transplantation is still necessary.

METHODS

Outcomes and postoperative liver function of 43 primary LRT patients were compared with those of 49 primary SLT patients (14 ex situ, 35 in situ) with known graft weight performed between April 1996 and December 2000. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 35 months, actual patient survival rates were 82% in the SLT group and 88% in the LRT group. Actual graft survival rates were 76% and 81%, respectively. The incidence of primary nonfunction was 12% in the SLT group and 2.3% in the LRT group. Liver function parameters (prothrombin time, factor V, bilirubin clearance) and surgical complication rates did not differ significantly. In the SLT group, mean cold ischemic time was longer than in the LRT group. Serum values of alanine aminotransferase during the first postoperative week were significantly higher in the SLT group. In the LRT group, there were more grafts with signs of fatty degeneration than in the SLT group.

CONCLUSIONS

The short- and long-term outcomes after LRT and SLT did not differ significantly. To avoid the risk for the donor in LRT, SLT represents the first-line therapy in pediatric liver transplantation in countries where cadaveric organs are available. LRT provides a solution for urgent cases in which a cadaveric graft cannot be found in time or if the choice of the optimal time point for transplantation is vital.