1
|
Gallego-Alberto L, Losada A, Cabrera I, Romero-Moreno R, Pérez-Miguel A, Pedroso-Chaparro MDS, Márquez-González M. "I Feel Guilty". Exploring Guilt-Related Dynamics in Family Caregivers of People with Dementia. Clin Gerontol 2022; 45:1294-1303. [PMID: 32496935 DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1769244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Objectives: Family caregivers of people with dementia often report feelings of guilt. However, the number of studies analyzing guilt and the factors associated with its appearance are scarce. The aim of this study is to explore the subjective experience of guilt in the family care of people with dementia.Methods: A qualitative analysis of the narratives of 13 family caregivers of people with dementia about their feelings of guilt was done.Results: Seven categories for understanding guilt in caregiving were obtained: guilt derived from actions themselves; guilt derived from one's limitations; guilt for feeling negative emotions; guilt associated with the change in the relationship with the person cared for; guilt for neglecting other areas; guilt induced by the person cared for, and guilt induced by others. The results showed the existence of cases in which guilt is absent by distress-avoiding processes.Conclusions: Guilt is a relevant variable in understanding caregiver distress, and its analysis is necessary for therapeutic work in the field of care.Clinical implications: Psychological interventions aimed at family caregivers should include specific techniques in order to address guilt feelings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Gallego-Alberto
- Biological and Health Psychology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Andrés Losada
- Clinical Psychology Area, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Cabrera
- Biological and Health Psychology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Romero-Moreno
- Clinical Psychology Area, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ana Pérez-Miguel
- Biological and Health Psychology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - María Márquez-González
- Biological and Health Psychology Department, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caldwell J, Meredith P, Whittingham K, Ziviani J. Shame and guilt in the postnatal period: a systematic review. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2020; 39:67-85. [PMID: 32338047 DOI: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1754372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this review was to explore the unique contribution of shame (negative evaluation of the self) and guilt (negative evaluation of behaviour) to postnatal psychological symptoms. Background: Although shame and guilt are related to psychological symptoms, the separate effect of each in postnatal psychological symptoms are not yet known. Methods: Seven electronic databases were systematically reviewed for articles on: (1) quantitative measures of shame, guilt, and psychological symptoms (2) in the postnatal period for infants under two years of age (3) published in English. Results: Of the 1,615 articles retrieved using PRISMA guidelines, five met criteria and were analysed independently by two reviewers using the STROBE criteria. In mothers, shame was significantly related to stress and postnatal depression. Shame significantly predicted postnatal depression. Guilt was significantly related to postnatal depression; however, the relationship was substantially reduced when included with shame. In fathers, shame, but not guilt, was significantly related to stress, anxiety, and depression. Conclusion: Shame and guilt are trans-diagnostic phenomena, negatively impacting on postnatal psychological health, and potentially the parent-child relationship. More research is needed to develop awareness of the unique effects of shame and guilt to optimise perinatal intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Caldwell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia
| | - Pamela Meredith
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University , Rockhampton, Australia
| | - Koa Whittingham
- Queensland Cerebral Palsy and Rehabilitation Research Centre, UQ Child Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jenny Ziviani
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Losada A, Márquez-González M, Vara-García C, Gallego-Alberto L, Romero-Moreno R, Pillemer K. Ambivalence and guilt feelings: Two relevant variables for understanding caregivers' depressive symptomatology. Clin Psychol Psychother 2017; 25:59-64. [DOI: 10.1002/cpp.2116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrés Losada
- Clinical Psychology Area; Universidad Rey Juan Carlos; Madrid Spain
| | - María Márquez-González
- Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; Madrid Spain
| | | | - Laura Gallego-Alberto
- Department of Biological and Clinical Psychology; Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; Madrid Spain
| | | | - Karl Pillemer
- Department of Human Development; Cornell University; Ithaca NY USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vasconcelos E Sa D, Barrowclough C, Hartley S, Wearden A. Self-blame attributions in relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis: Associations with relatives' distress and behavioural control. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY 2017; 56:172-188. [PMID: 28397280 DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2015] [Revised: 02/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is evidence that self-blame is an important predictor of distress and depression in relatives of people with long-term psychosis, but there is limited research investigating the nature and correlates of self-blame in relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis. Self-blame motivates a tendency to engage with others and to repair wrongdoings; it might be that such cognitions also impact on relatives' behaviours towards the patient. This study examined the association between self-blame and psychological distress, and tested the prediction that greater self-blame would be associated with more behavioural control attempts to patients in a sample of relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis. METHODS Statements pertaining to self-blame and behavioural control were extracted and rated from 80 interviews with relatives, who also completed the General Health Questionnaire-28. Content analysis was used to examine the nature of self-blame attributions. Regression analyses were used to explore the links between self-blame attributions and distress, and between self-blame and behavioural control in this recent-onset population. RESULTS Higher levels of self-blame were associated with more behavioural control attempts, and self-blame predicted relatives' behavioural responses when adjusting for the contribution of control attributions. Self-blame was also linked with distress, but did not emerge as an independent predictor in multivariate analysis. Most relatives who blamed themselves did so for not overseeing their family member's mental health problems properly or for perceiving themselves generally as poor carers. CONCLUSIONS This study extends findings related to self-blame to a population of relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis and highlights the possible role of blaming cognitions in promoting interpersonal engagement through behavioural control. PRACTITIONER POINTS Self-blaming beliefs were linked with increased distress in relatives of people with recent-onset psychosis; Increased self-blame was associated with more behavioural control attempts; Most relatives blamed themselves for not overseeing their family member's mental health problems properly, and for perceiving themselves generally as poor carers. The cross-sectional study design limits inferences about causality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Samantha Hartley
- School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Alison Wearden
- School of Psychological Sciences & Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, The University of Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lippi G. Schizophrenia in a member of the family: Burden, expressed emotion and addressing the needs of the whole family. S Afr J Psychiatr 2016; 22:922. [PMID: 30263163 PMCID: PMC6138106 DOI: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v22i1.922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
How often do we find ourselves concentrating so much on treating a patient with schizophrenia that we forget about the needs and difficulties of the family members who take care of that patient? This article highlights the global and specific difficulties that families and caregivers experience in having to care for chronically ill family members with schizophrenia with a backdrop of continuing global deinstitutionalisation of such patients. Matters such as burden and expressed emotion are explored, family-specific interventions are discussed and areas of service delivery and resource inadequacies are identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Lippi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dahlqvist V, Eriksson S, Glasberg AL, Lindahl E, Lützén K, Strandberg G, Söderberg A, Sørlie V, Norberg A. Development of the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire. Nurs Ethics 2016; 14:181-93. [PMID: 17425147 DOI: 10.1177/0969733007073700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Health care often involves ethically difficult situations that may disquiet the conscience. The purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire for identifying various perceptions of conscience within a framework based on the literature and on explorative interviews about perceptions of conscience (Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire). The questionnaire was tested on a sample of 444 registered nurses, enrolled nurses, nurses’ assistants and physicians. The data were analysed using principal component analysis to explore possible dimensions of perceptions of conscience. The results showed six dimensions, found also in theory and empirical health care studies. Conscience was perceived as authority, a warning signal, demanding sensitivity, an asset, a burden and depending on culture. We conclude that the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire is valid for assessing some perceptions of conscience relevant to health care providers.
Collapse
|
7
|
Bemister TB, Brooks BL, Kirton A. Development, reliability, and validity of the Alberta Perinatal Stroke Project Parental Outcome Measure. Pediatr Neurol 2014; 51:43-52. [PMID: 24938139 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2014.01.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2013] [Revised: 01/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perinatal stroke is a leading cause of cerebral palsy and lifelong disability, although parent and family outcomes have not yet been studied in this specific population. The Alberta Perinatal Stroke Project Parental Outcome Measure was developed as a 26-item questionnaire on the impact of perinatal stroke on parents and families. METHODS The items were derived from expert opinion and scientific literature on issues salient to parents of children with perinatal stroke, including guilt and blame, which are not well captured in existing measures of family impact. Data were collected from 82 mothers and 28 fathers who completed the Parental Outcome Measure and related questionnaires (mean age, 39.5 years; mean child age, 7.4 years). Analyses examined the Parental Outcome Measure's internal consistency, test-retest reliability, validity, and factor structure. RESULTS The Parental Outcome Measure demonstrated three unique theoretical constructs: Psychosocial Impact, Guilt, and Blame. The Parental Outcome Measure has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.91) and very good test-retest reliability more than 2-5 weeks (r = 0.87). Regarding validity, the Parental Outcome Measure is sensitive to condition severity, accounts for additional variance in parent outcomes, and strongly correlates with measures of anxiety, depression, stress, quality of life, family functioning, and parent adjustment. CONCLUSIONS The Parental Outcome Measure contributes to the literature as the first brief measure of family impact designed for parents of children with perinatal stroke.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taryn B Bemister
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Brian L Brooks
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Neurosciences (Brain Injury and Rehabilitation Programs), Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kirton
- Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Calgary Pediatric Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Branger C, O’Connell ME, Morgan DG. Factor Analysis of the 12-Item Zarit Burden Interview in Caregivers of Persons Diagnosed With Dementia. J Appl Gerontol 2014; 35:489-507. [PMID: 24652929 DOI: 10.1177/0733464813520222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 12/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) is commonly used to measure dementia caregiver burden, but its factor structure is unclear. A two-factor structure for the 12-item ZBI, “personal strain” and “role strain,” has been shown, but recent data suggest that an additional factor of “guilt” is embedded in the “role strain” items. The 12-item ZBI administered to 194 informal rural and urban caregivers of persons diagnosed with dementia was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis. A two-factor structure, with item loadings consistent with previously conceptualized constructs of “personal strain” and “role strain,” was found. Moreover, this factor structure was invariant to caregiver subgroups. When the predictive value of these factors was explored, only “personal strain” was important in predicting caregiver psychological distress, measured with the Brief Symptom Inventory. However, “role strain,” which included the hypothesized “guilt” items, did not appear to be an important predictor of caregiver distress.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family care of frail elderly people has been linked to significant negative consequences for caregivers' mental health. Although outcome variables such as burden and depression have been widely analyzed in this population, guilt, an emotion frequently observed in caregivers, has not received sufficient attention in the research literature. METHODS Face-to-face interviews were carried out with 288 dementia caregivers. Guilt was measured using the Caregiver Guilt Questionnaire (CGQ). RESULTS Using principal components analysis, 22 items were retained and five factors were obtained which explained 59.25% of the variance. These factors were labeled: guilt about doing wrong by the care recipient, guilt about not rising to the occasion as caregivers, guilt about self-care, guilt about neglecting other relatives, and guilt about having negative feelings towards other people. Acceptable reliability indexes were found, and significant associations between the CGQ and its factors and the Zarit Burden Interview guilt factor were also found. Caregivers with higher scores on the CGQ also scored higher in depression, anxiety, frequency and appraisal of behavioral problems. Negative associations between the CGQ and its factors and frequency of/and satisfaction with leisure and social support were also found. Being female and caring for a parent were associated with higher scores on the CGQ. CONCLUSIONS Feelings of guilt are significantly related to caregiver distress. The CGQ may be a useful measure for acknowledging feelings of guilt in caregivers; moreover, it can be used as an outcome variable for psychoeducational interventions aimed at reducing caregiver distress.
Collapse
|
10
|
DOST AYFER, YAGMURLU BILGE. Are Constructiveness and Destructiveness Essential Features of Guilt and Shame Feelings Respectively? JOURNAL FOR THE THEORY OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR 2008. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00362.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
11
|
Abstract
Moral emotions represent a key element of our human moral apparatus, influencing the link between moral standards and moral behavior. This chapter reviews current theory and research on moral emotions. We first focus on a triad of negatively valenced "self-conscious" emotions-shame, guilt, and embarrassment. As in previous decades, much research remains focused on shame and guilt. We review current thinking on the distinction between shame and guilt, and the relative advantages and disadvantages of these two moral emotions. Several new areas of research are highlighted: research on the domain-specific phenomenon of body shame, styles of coping with shame, psychobiological aspects of shame, the link between childhood abuse and later proneness to shame, and the phenomena of vicarious or "collective" experiences of shame and guilt. In recent years, the concept of moral emotions has been expanded to include several positive emotions-elevation, gratitude, and the sometimes morally relevant experience of pride. Finally, we discuss briefly a morally relevant emotional process-other-oriented empathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Price Tangney
- Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
| | - Jeff Stuewig
- Department of Psychology, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia 22030
| | - Debra J. Mashek
- Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Miller R, Mason SE. Shame and Guilt in First-Episode Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorders. JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOTHERAPY 2005. [DOI: 10.1007/s10879-005-2701-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|