The reliability of long-term storage of direct immunofluorescent staining slides at room temperature

Multiplex Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence: A Practical Update for Pathologists

Our understanding of the biology and management of human disease has undergone a remarkable evolution in recent decades. Improved understanding of the roles of complex immune populations in the tumor microenvironment has advanced our knowledge of antitumor immunity, and immunotherapy has radically improved outcomes for many advanced cancers. Digital pathology has unlocked new possibilities for the assessment and discovery of the tumor microenvironment, such as quantitative and spatial image analysis. Despite these advances, tissue-based evaluations for diagnosis and prognosis continue to rely on traditional practices, such as hematoxylin and eosin staining, supplemented by the assessment of single biomarkers largely using chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC). Such approaches are poorly suited to complex quantitative analyses and the simultaneous evaluation of multiple biomarkers. Thus, multiplex staining techniques have significant potential to improve diagnostic practice and immuno-oncology research. The different approaches to achieve multiplexed IHC and immunofluorescence are described in this study. Alternatives to multiplex immunofluorescence/IHC include epitope-based tissue mass spectrometry and digital spatial profiling (DSP), which require specialized platforms not available to most clinical laboratories. Virtual multiplexing, which involves digitally coregistering singleplex IHC stains performed on serial sections, is another alternative to multiplex staining. Regardless of the approach, analysis of multiplexed stains sequentially or simultaneously will benefit from standardized protocols and digital pathology workflows. Although this is a complex and rapidly advancing field, multiplex staining is now technically feasible for most clinical laboratories and may soon be leveraged for routine diagnostic use. This review provides an update on the current state of the art for tissue multiplexing, including the capabilities and limitations of different techniques, with an emphasis on potential relevance to clinical diagnostic practice.

Transpathology: molecular imaging-based pathology

Pathology is the medical specialty concerned with the study of the disease nature and causes, playing a key role in bridging basic researches and clinical medicine. In the course of development, pathology has significantly expanded our understanding of disease, and exerted enormous impact on the management of patients. However, challenges facing pathology, the inherent invasiveness of pathological practice and the persistent concerns on the sample representativeness, constitute its limitations. Molecular imaging is a noninvasive technique to visualize, characterize, and measure biological processes at the molecular level in living subjects. With the continuous development of equipment and probes, molecular imaging has enabled an increasingly precise evaluation of pathophysiological changes. A new pathophysiology visualization system based on molecular imaging is forming and shows the great potential to reform the pathological practice. Several improvements in "trans-," including trans-scale, transparency, and translation, would be driven by this new kind of pathological practice. Pathological changes could be evaluated in a trans-scale imaging mode; tissues could be transparentized to better present the underlying pathophysiological information; and the translational processes of basic research to the clinical practice would be better facilitated. Thus, transpathology would greatly facilitate in deciphering the pathophysiological events in a multiscale perspective, and supporting the precision medicine in the future.

Practical Direct Immunofluorescence

Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) remains a valuable tool that may be underused because of perceived challenges in the interpretation, limitations, and processing of DIF specimens. The aim of this review is to provide a practical guide for appropriately incorporating DIF in a variety of clinical diseases, such as autoimmune blistering disorders. In vasculitis, the role of DIF continues to evolve, particularly in the setting of IgA vasculitis. Although typically not indicated for the workup of connective tissue disease, DIF may be helpful in cases with negative serologies, nondiagnostic histologic findings, or scarring alopecia. Practical pearls for biopsy technique, specimen handling, and storage are also discussed.

Métodos diagnósticos en las enfermedades ampollosas subepidérmicas autoinmunes

There is considerable clinical and histological overlap among the subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases. The knowledge at the molecular level of the dermo-epidermal junction is essential to understand this group of diseases. The immune-based techniques have contributed to increase the knowledge of these entities and have been progressively incorporated into clinical practice. In this review of the diagnostic methods of subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases we summarize the most recent advances on the molecular biology of the dermo-epidermal junction, focusing on the immune-based diagnostic techniques. We distinguish two main groups of diagnostic methods: those that detect autoimmune deposits in the skin (direct immunofluorescence and its variants including confocal microscopy) and those that detect antibodies in serum or in other fluids (indirect immunofluorescence and its variants, ELISA, immunoblot and immunoprecipitation). We explain the methodology and diagnostic keys of the techniques most widely applied in our milieu.