Altered pharmacokinetics and metabolism of valproate after replacement of conventional valproate with the slow-release formulation in epileptic patients

Predictors of valproic acid steady-state serum levels in adult and pediatric psychiatric inpatients: a comparative analysis

RATIONALE

Valproic acid (VPA) is commonly used as a second-line mood stabilizer or augmentative agent in severe mental illnesses. However, population pharmacokinetic studies specific to psychiatric populations are limited, and clinical predictors for the precision application of VPA remain undefined.

OBJECTIVES

To identify steady-state serum VPA level predictors in pediatric/adolescent and adult psychiatric inpatients.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 634 patients and 1,068 steady-state therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) data points recorded from 2015 to 2021. Steady-state VPA levels were obtained after tapering during each hospitalization episode. Electronic patient records were screened for routine clinical parameters and co-medication. Generalized additive mixed models were employed to identify independent predictors.

RESULTS

Most TDM episodes involved patients with psychotic disorders, including schizophrenia (29.2%) and schizoaffective disorder (17.3%). Polypharmacy was common, with the most frequent combinations being VPA + quetiapine and VPA + promethazine. Age was significantly associated with VPA levels, with pediatric/adolescent patients (< 18 years) demonstrating higher dose-adjusted serum levels of VPA (β = 7.6±2.34, p < 0.001) after accounting for BMI. Women tended to have higher adjusted VPA serum levels than men (β = 5.08±1.62, p < 0.001). The formulation of VPA (Immediate-release vs. extended-release) showed no association with VPA levels. Co-administration of diazepam exhibited a dose-dependent decrease in VPA levels (F = 15.7, p < 0.001), suggesting a potential pharmacokinetic interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the utility of population-specific pharmacokinetic data for VPA in psychiatric populations. Age, gender, and co-administration of diazepam were identified as predictors of VPA levels. Further research is warranted to establish additional predictors and optimize the precision application of VPA in psychiatric patients.

Quantitative systems pharmacology Model to characterize valproic acid-induced hyperammonemia and the effect of L-carnitine supplementation

Valproic acid (VPA) is a short-chain fatty acid widely prescribed in the treatment of seizure disorders and epilepsy syndromes, although its therapeutic value may be undermined by its toxicity. VPA serious adverse effects are reported to have a significant and dose-dependent incidence, many associated with VPA-induced hyperammonemia. This effect has been linked with reduced levels of carnitine; an endogenous compound involved in fatty acid's mitochondrial β-oxidation by facilitation of its entrance via the carnitine shuttle. High exposure to VPA can lead to carnitine depletion causing a misbalance between the intra-mitochondrial β-oxidation and the microsomal ω-oxidation, a pathway that produces toxic metabolites such as 4-en-VPA which inhibits ammonia elimination. Moreover, a reduction in carnitine levels might be also related to VPA-induced obesity and lipids disorder. In turn, L-carnitine supplementation (CS) has been recommended and empirically used to reduce VPA's hepatotoxicity. The aim of this work was to develop a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model to characterize VPA-induced hyperammonemia and evaluate the benefits of CS in preventing hyperammonemia under both chronic treatment and after VPA overdosing. The QSP model included a VPA population pharmacokinetics model that allowed the prediction of total and unbound concentrations after single and multiple oral doses considering its saturable binding to plasma proteins. Predictions of time courses for 2-en-VPA, 4-en-DPA, VPA-glucuronide, carnitine, ammonia and urea levels, and for the relative change in fatty acids, Acetyl-CoA, and glutamate reflected the VPA induced changes and the efficacy of the treatment with L-carnitine. The QSP model was implemented to give a rational basis for the L-carnitine dose selection to optimize CS depending on VPA dosage regime and to assess the currently recommended L-carnitine rescue therapy after VPA overdosing. Results show that a L-carnitine dose equal to the double of the VPA dose using the same interdose interval would maintain the ammonia levels at baseline. The QSP model may be expanded in the future to describe other adverse events linked to VPA-induced changes in endogenous compounds.

Efficacy, Safety, and Retention Rate of Extended-Release Divalproex Versus Conventional Delayed-Release Divalproex: A Meta-Analysis of Controlled Clinical Trials

Purpose: A novel once-daily divalproex-extended release (ER) dose formulation has been developed; this formulation prolongs the therapeutic serum levels of the drug, compared with the twice-daily conventional divalproex-delayed release (DR) formulation. This study aimed to systematically examine and compare the efficacy, safety, and retention rates of the ER divalproex (VPA-ER) and conventional DR divalproex (VPA-DR) formulations.

Methods: Randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy, adverse events (AEs), and medication compliance of ER and DR divalproex were searched in online databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, by searching MeSH words and term words. Observational studies with potential biases were excluded. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 16.0 software.

Findings: Thirteen RCTs, involving 1,028 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. Efficacy, AEs, and drug retention rates were the main study outcomes. According to our study, VPA-ER presented clinically significant benefits compared with the placebo in the population with bipolar disorder (BD) (39.5% versus 27.2%, p < 0.001). A similar efficacy of VPA-ER and VPA-DR in controlling seizures was observed in epilepsy patients (87.4% versus 86.5%, p = 0.769). A significantly lower incidence of AEs was reported in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (26.8% versus 34.8%, p = 0.003). By contrast, there was no evidence of difference in safety between VPA-ER and VPA-DR (29.4% versus 30.5%, p = 0.750). In addition, the drug retention rate was significantly lower in the VPA-ER group than in the placebo group (76.0% versus 82.7%, p = 0.020), especially in migraine patients (p = 0.022) and in patients who were treated for fewer than 4 weeks (p = 0.018).

Implications: The efficacy of VPA-ER was significantly superior to that of the placebo treatment, which provided efficacy similar to that of conventional VPA-DR. VPA-ER is well tolerated with a low rate of AEs compared to the placebo. In addition, the acceptable medicine compliance of VPA-ER was conducive to the long-term maintenance treatment of chronic diseases. Although we analyzed open labels and crossover design RCTs, large-scale multicenter studies on the efficacy and medicine compliance of new ER formulations with less AEs are required to validate our conclusion.

The clinical characteristics and related factors of tremor in patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Tremor is frequently observed in patients with epilepsy (PWE), which is generally attributed to the side-effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) particularly valproate (VPA) with largely unknown mechanisms. The study aimed to assess the clinical features and related factors of tremor in PWE with tremor.

METHODS

PWE with tremor and a control group of age- and sex-matched PWE without tremor were enrolled. Detailed demographic and clinical information for each individual was recorded. PWE with tremor were evaluated by The Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST) and Tremor Related Activities of Daily Living (TRADL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

132 individuals were enrolled, which including sixty-six (36 males) PWE with tremor with mean age of 33 years and epilepsy duration of 12.5 years. Tremor was postural in all, with median duration of four and one year from diagnosis and AED treatment to the onset of tremor respectively. The upper limbs were predominantly affected. VPA had been used in 62 (93.9%) PWE with tremor compared to 31 (47.0%) PWE without tremor (P < 0.001). The total CRST score was significantly associated with epilepsy duration and maximum VPA dosage (B = 0.30, p < 0.001; B = 0.32, p = 0.013). Patients with VPA dosage over 17.05 mg/kg/d might be more vulnerable to develop tremor.

CONCLUSIONS

PWE with tremor were more frequently treated with VPA, however, tremor was mild in most without any functional impairment. Epilepsy duration and maximum VPA dosage were important factors of tremor severity, suggesting mechanisms underlying tremor in PWE may be an elaborate interplay of AEDs and disease itself.

Comparative efficacy and risk of harms of immediate- versus extended-release second-generation antidepressants: a systematic review with network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has detrimental effects on an individual's personal life, leads to increased risk of comorbidities, and places an enormous economic burden on society. Several 'second-generation' antidepressants are available as both immediate-release (IR) and extended-release formulations. The advantage of extended-release formulations may be the potentially improved adherence and a lower risk of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review to assess the comparative efficacy, risk of harms, and patients' adherence of IR and extended-release antidepressants for the treatment of MDD.

DATA SOURCE

English-language abstracts were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 to October 2012, as well as from reference lists of pertinent review articles and grey literature searches.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of at least 6 weeks' duration that compared an IR formulation with an extended-release formulation of the same antidepressant in adult patients with MDD. We also included placebo-controlled trials to conduct a network meta-analysis. To assess harms and adherence, in addition to RCTs, we searched for observational studies with ≥1,000 participants and a follow-up of ≥12 weeks.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

We dually reviewed abstracts and full texts and assessed quality ratings. Lacking head-to-head evidence for many comparisons of interest, we conducted network meta-analyses using Bayesian methods. Our outcome measure of choice was response on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.

RESULTS

We located seven head-to-head trials and 94 placebo- and active-controlled trials for network meta-analysis. Overall, our analyses indicate that IR and extended-release formulations do not differ substantially with respect to efficacy and risk of harms. The evidence is mixed with respect to differences in adherence, indicating lower adherence for IR formulations.

LIMITATIONS

The lack of head-to-head comparisons for many drugs compromises our conclusions. Network meta-analyses have methodological limitations that need to be taken into consideration when interpreting findings.

CONCLUSION

Available evidence currently shows no clear differences between the two formulations and therefore we cannot recommend a first choice. However, if adherence or compliance with one medication is an issue, then clinicians and patients should consider the alternative medication. If adherence or costs are a problem with one formulation, consideration of the other formulation to provide an adequate treatment trial is reasonable.

Extended-release formulations for the treatment of epilepsy

This review analyses the concept of extended-release (ER) formulations in epilepsy and evaluates ER formulations of carbamazepine, valproic acid and a modified-release (MR) formulation of oxcarbazepine. ER formulations are usually designed to reduce dose frequency and maintain relatively constant or flat plasma drug concentration. It is questionable whether flat plasma concentrations of an antiepileptic drug (AED) improve antiepileptic efficacy compared with fluctuating plasma concentrations. More certainly, they minimise concentration-related adverse effects, and the dosing flexibility and consistency of plasma concentrations may simplify the management of antiepileptic drug therapy. Neurologists would like ER formulations that can be administered once- and/or twice-daily to tailor therapy for the individual patient; however, switching dosage schedules from multiple dosages per day to once daily, although more convenient, will not generally improve therapeutic coverage (maintenance of effective drug concentration in biological fluids and tissue). Pharmacokinetically, the impact of a missed dose is greater the larger the dose and the less frequent the administration. Therefore, the risk of breakthrough seizure is higher during AED once-daily administration than twice-daily administration. Consequently, the increased compliance observed with fewer dosages per day should be weighed against the impact or forgiveness of omitted dose(s) and the shorter 'forgiveness' period associated with once-daily administration. Currently, the trend is to treat patients with epilepsy with ER formulations because of the better compliance, convenience and flat plasma concentration versus time curve. Thus, it seems that the term 'flatter is better' for AED plasma profiles has precipitated in the last 10-15 years among neurologists and epilepsy caregivers, and is being promoted by marketing forces of pharmaceutical companies. Data from the literature support the trend to treat epileptic patients with twice-daily administration of the existing ER formulations of valproic acid and carbamazepine, and oxcarbazepine-MR; however, the author of this article is not convinced that these ER formulations can guarantee a complete therapeutic coverage throughout the 24-hour dosing interval following once-daily administration. Epilepsy is a single-episode disease, and the convenience and possible better compliance associated with once-daily administration must be weighed against the shorter 'forgiveness' period and possible higher risk of breakthrough seizure due to sub-therapeutic plasma levels and/or omitted doses. Data suggest just a small difference in compliance between once- and twice-daily administration, with no significant difference in efficacy. Therefore, the increased compliance following once-daily administration may be counter-productive in minimising the occurrence of sub-therapeutic drug concentrations. Weighing up the advantages and disadvantages for once- versus twice-daily administration of ER formulations in epilepsy leads to a conclusion in favour of twice-daily administration.

Computerized Tremor Analysis of Valproate-induced Tremor: A Comparative Study of Controlled-release versus Conventional Valproate

PURPOSE

Valproate (VPA) induces postural tremor in 6-45% of patients. The characteristics of VPA-induced tremor have not yet been quantitatively assessed, and it is not known whether tremor prevalence or severity is affected by VPA formulation (controlled-release CR-VPA vs. conventional VPA). The aim of this study was quantitatively to assess tremor in epilepsy patients receiving VPA and to compare the effects of two VPA formulations (CR-VPA vs. VPA) on tremor severity.

METHODS

In a prospective study, 18 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed focal or generalized epilepsy were assigned to receive alternately either VPA (n=10) or CR-VPA (n=8) monotherapy. Computerized tremor analysis was performed at baseline 1 day before initiating VPA treatment and repeated after a seizure-free period of >or=8 weeks, during which VPA doses had remained stable. Rest and postural tremor were recorded by accelerometry, and surface electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded from the wrist flexors and extensors.

RESULTS

At baseline, the two groups had similar postural tremor amplitudes. At follow-up, the CR-VPA group had remained at the same level, whereas VPA subjects exhibited a significant increase in tremor amplitudes (p<0.05) despite comparable VPA doses and comparable plasma VPA concentrations at the time of tremor testing.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to assess quantitatively VPA-induced tremor by standardized tremor analysis. These results suggest that CR-VPA may cause less tremorigenic activity as compared with standard VPA. The mechanisms underlying this difference are unclear but may include greater peak-trough variation with VPA than with CR-VPA.