Functional connections between medial prefrontal cortex and caudate-putamen in brain-stimulation reward of rats

Drive and Reinforcement Circuitry in the Brain: Origins, Neurotransmitters, and Projection Fields

Brain stimulation has identified two central subsets of stimulation sites with motivational relevance. First, there is a large and disperse set of sites where stimulation is reinforcing, increasing the frequency of the responses it follows, and second, a much more restricted set of sites where-along with reinforcement-stimulation also has drive-like effects, instigating feeding, copulation, predation, and other motivated acts in otherwise sated or peaceful animals. From this work a dispersed but synaptically interconnected network of reinforcement circuitry is emerging: it includes afferents to the ventral tegmental area and substantia nigra; the dopamine systems themselves; glutamatergic afferents to the striatum; and one of two dopamine-receptor-expressing efferent pathways of the striatum. Stimulation of a limited subset of these sites, including descending inhibitory medial forebrain bundle fibers, induces both feeding and reinforcement, and suggests the possibility of a subset of fibers where stimulation has both drive-like and reinforcing effects. This review stresses the common findings of sites and connectivity between electrical and optogenetic studies of core drive and reinforcement sites. By doing so, it suggests the biological importance of optogenetic follow-up of less-publicized electrical stimulation findings. Such studies promise not only information about origins, neurotransmitters, and connectivity of related networks, by covering more sensory and at least one putative motor component they also promote a much deeper understanding of the breadth of motivational function.

Interhemispheric involvement of the anterior cortical nuclei of the amygdala in rewarding brain stimulation

The amygdaloid complex is one of the structures thought to modulate brain stimulation reward (BSR) elicited from the median forebrain bundle (MFB). Previous metabolic and behavioral data from our laboratory point to the amygdaloid cortical nuclei as key to this process. In this study, thresholds for rewarding stimulation of the MFB were determined for 42 days, 21 days following an electrolytic lesion to amygdaloid nuclei ipsilateral to the stimulation electrode, and 21 days following one applied to the contralateral amygdala. A subset of animals showed post-lesion changes in MFB frequency thresholds that were maintained if not augmented after the second lesion. These ranged from 26% to 150% compared to baseline values, among the largest ever reported to our knowledge. Interestingly, damage to anterior sites within the cortical nuclei was the most effective in producing modifications to the rewarding value of the stimulation. Equally singular was the finding that contralateral lesions tended to alter thresholds more than ipsilateral ones, confirming our earlier finding of interhemispheric connectivity in amygdaloid modulation of MFB reward signals. This interpretation was substantiated by tracking long-term metabolic activity in the amygdala using cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. The density of reaction product at damaged amygdala sites was negatively correlated (r=-0.90) with the increases in thresholds obtained at contralateral MFB loci. Together with the fact that such large lesion effects are seldom obtained, our metabolic results point to the existence of a relationship between these nuclei and reward signals generated at the MFB. Moreover, our data suggest that this communication takes place interhemispherically.

Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of a posterior cortical-prefrontal-basal forebrain circuitry in modulating sensory responses in visual and somatosensory rat cortical areas

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) receives input from sensory neocortical regions and sends projections to the basal forebrain (BF). The present study tested the possibility that pathways from sensory cortical regions via the PFC-BF and from the BF back to specific sensory cortical areas could modulate sensory responses. Two prefrontal areas that responded to stimulation of the primary somatosensory and visual cortices were delineated: an area encompassing the rostral part of the cingulate cortex that responded to visual cortex stimulation, and a region dorso-lateral to the first in the precentral-motor association area that reacted to somatosensory cortex stimulation. Moreover, BF neurons responded to PFC electrical stimulation. They were located in the ventral pallidum, substantia innominata and the horizontal limb of the diagonal-band areas. Of the responsive BF neurons 42% reacted only to stimulation of 'visually-responsive,' 33% responded only to the 'somatosensory-responsive' prefrontal sites and the remaining neurons reacted to both prefrontal cortical areas. The effect of BF and PFC stimulations on somatosensory and visual-evoked potentials was tested. BF stimulation increased the amplitude of both sensory-evoked potentials. However, stimulation of the 'somatosensory-responsive' prefrontal area increased only somatosensory-evoked potentials while 'visually-responsive' prefrontal-area stimulation increased only visual-evoked potentials. Atropine blocked both facilitatory effects. The proposed cortico-prefronto-basalo-cortical circuitry may have an important role in cortical plasticity and selective attention.

Hypotension-induced dopamine release in prefrontal cortex is mediated by local glutamatergic projections at the level of nerve terminals

In a previous study it was shown that nitroprusside-induced hypotension strongly enhances the release of dopamine (DA) in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). In the present study we have further investigated the mechanism involved in this effect. Glutamate receptor antagonists were infused into the ventral tegmental area (VTA) or PFC, while DA release was measured in the ipsilateral PFC and hypotension was applied by intravenous infusion of nitroprusside. Infusion into the VTA of neither a NMDA receptor antagonist (CPP), nor a non-NMDA antagonist (DNQX) affected the hypotension-induced increase of DA in the PFC. Intracortical infusion of CPP also failed to affect significantly, whereas local infusion of DNQX inhibited the hypotension-enhanced release of DA dose-dependently. The stimulation of DA release was relatively small in the VTA as well as in the nucleus accumbens when compared with the response in the PFC. It is concluded that DA released from mesocortical neurons can be modulated by two different mechanisms: first, by glutamate afferents to the VTA that modify the nerve-impulse flow of DA neurons; and, second, by glutamate afferents to the PFC that act at the level of the DA nerve terminals. The behaviour context (arousal or stress versus hypotension) determines which type of interaction predominates.

The substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area: III. Connections to the lateral hypothalamic area

Double-pulse tests were used to estimate the refractory periods and anatomical linkage of the reward-relevant fibers that course between the lateral preoptic and lateral hypothalamic areas. In the 1st study, pairs of conditioning and test pulses were delivered to each site, and the interval between pulses varied; recovery from refractoriness was similar at both sites, with the curves generally rising from 0.6 to 2.0 ms. In the 2nd study, the pairs of pulses were delivered to both sites. Six of 7 rats showed evidence of axonal collision, with estimates of conduction velocity that ranged from 0.48 to 8.95 m/s across rats. These results suggest that a wide spectrum of fiber types characterizes the reward-relevant axons that course uninterruptedly between these 2 regions.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

The substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area. II. Connections to the ventral tegmental area

This experiment investigated the existence of a direct anatomical connection between lateral preoptic and ventral tegmental areas that mediate brain stimulation reward using the behavioral adaptation of the collision test. This test is a double-pulse, two-electrode technique based on the axonal conduction failure that occurs when two separate sites in the same axon bundle are concurrently stimulated. This anatomical arrangement is inferred from the shape of the function relating the effectiveness of double-pulse stimulation to the interval between pulses. In this study, nine rats with a total of 44 pairs of sites were examined. In two pairs only was there a profile suggestive of an axonal collision effect, while the double-pulse effectiveness curve consistent with the properties of transynaptic collision was apparent for a single pair of sites; the remaining 93% were associated with relatively flat effectiveness curves. While electrode misalignment could be responsible for these results, there was adequate sampling to suggest that the preponderance of first stage signals that give rise to the rewarding effects mediated by the lateral preoptic and ventral tegmental areas do not travel along the same fiber bundle. However, stimulation applied to both sites concurrently produces a summation that is roughly 40% greater than stimulation at either site alone, suggesting reasonable integration of the reward signals generated by lateral preoptic and ventral tegmental area stimulation.

The substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area. I. Anatomical mapping of its boundaries

Given the putative role of the lateral preoptic area as a primary contributor of the cell bodies of origin of the descending pathway linking a subset of lateral hypothalamic and ventral tegmental area reward neurons, the distribution of self-stimulation sites in this structure was mapped in 22 animals using moveable electrodes and threshold procedures. Ninety-seven electrode sites were evaluated with placements ranging from just rostral to the midline convergence of the anterior commissure back to the transition zone between the lateral preoptic and lateral hypothalamic areas; of these, roughly 2/3 supported self-stimulation which was widely observed throughout the lateral preoptic area and medial forebrain bundle. In general, self-stimulation thresholds obtained from lateral sites were most stable, and progressively so approaching more caudal regions. Examination of the slopes of the period/current trade-off functions revealed a tendency for higher values in lateral and caudal sites; in contrast, dorsoventral excursions did not influence these estimates. Taken together, these data provide support for the notion that the substrate for brain-stimulation reward in the lateral preoptic area has a relatively homogeneous distribution that is more diffusely organized than that found in reward sites activated further caudally in the medial forebrain bundle.

Histochemical mapping of the substrate for brain-stimulation reward with glycogen phosphorylase

Glycogen phosphorylase is the enzyme that regulates glycogenolysis and it appears that there is a relationship between central levels of glycogen and neuronal activity, which is influenced by a variety of neurotransmitters. In the present study, glycogen phosphorylase histochemistry was used to correlate changes in metabolic activity in response to rewarding lateral hypothalamic stimulation. Rats were allowed to self-stimulate for 1 h per day for ten consecutive days following which postmortem phosphorylase a activity was examined. Significant differences in optical density between the stimulated and contralateral hemispheres were found in three of the eight analyzed structures, two of which, the diagonal band of Broca and the caudate nucleus, showed a greater density of glycogen phosphorylase a on the stimulated side and the third, the habenula, had greater contralateral activity. In conclusion, our data suggest that glycogen phosphorylase activity is a viable but not weighty marker of energy alterations induced by chronic exposure to intracranial self-stimulation, and that it is generally consistent with the patterns revealed by other metabolic indices such as cytochrome oxidase and 2-deoxyglucose autoradiography.