1
|
Kock LS, Erath TG, Coleman SRM, Higgins ST, Heil SH. Contingency management interventions for abstinence from cigarette smoking in pregnancy and postpartum: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med 2023; 176:107654. [PMID: 37532032 PMCID: PMC10828115 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Contingency management is one of the most effective treatments for substance use disorders in not-pregnant people. The most recent quantitative review of its efficacy among pregnant and postpartum women who smoke cigarettes concluded with moderate certainty that those receiving contingent financial incentives were twice as likely to be abstinent compared with controls. We aimed to update and extend previous reviews. Five databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published before December 2022 that assessed the effectiveness of incentives for abstinence from substance use. Data from trials of smoking abstinence were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis model (restricted maximum likelihood). Results are reported as risk-ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022372291. Twelve RCTs (3136) pregnant women) were included. There was high certainty evidence that women receiving incentives were more likely to be abstinent than controls at the last antepartum assessment (12 RCTs; RR = 2.43, 95% CI 2.04-2.91, n = 2941, I2 = 0.0%) and moderate certainty evidence at the longest postpartum assessment while incentives were still available (five RCTs; RR = 2.72, 1.47-5.02, n = 659, I2 = 44.5%), and at the longest postpartum follow-up after incentives were discontinued (six RCTs; RR = 1.93, 1.08-3.46, n = 1753, I2 = 51.8%). Pregnant women receiving incentives are twice as likely to achieve smoking abstinence during pregnancy suggesting this intervention should be standard care for pregnant women who smoke. The results also demonstrate that abstinence continues into the postpartum period, including after incentives are discontinued, but more trials measuring outcomes in the postpartum period are needed to strengthen this conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loren S Kock
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, United States.
| | - Tyler G Erath
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, United States
| | - Sulamunn R M Coleman
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, United States
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, United States
| | - Sarah H Heil
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 1 South Prospect St, Burlington, VT 05401, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Evemy CG, Kurti AN, Skelly JM, Medina NA, Higgins ST. Examining the latent factor structure of a hypothetical cigarette purchase task among pregnant women. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2023; 31:23-28. [PMID: 35587423 PMCID: PMC10900909 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The cigarette purchase task (CPT) is a valid behavioral-economic measure of demand that has smokers estimate hypothetical cigarette consumption under a range of escalating prices. The task involves no experimenter exposure of participants to smoking. CPT demand is measured in terms of five indices: intensity (cigarettes consumed at $0), Omax (largest expenditure), Pmax (price associated with peak expenditure), breakpoint (the first price at which consumption is 0), and elasticity (rate at which consumption changes as a function of increasing price). Out of concern for collinearity, prior studies investigated a more parsimonious CPT latent-factor structure for these derived indices consisting of two factors. The present study examined whether the same two latent-factor solutions extend to pregnant women who smoke. Six hundred sixty-five women completed the CPT as part of recruitment for a clinical trial examining the efficacy of a remote contingency-management intervention to promote smoking cessation during pregnancy. Factor analysis confirmed a two-factor solution to the CPT accounting for 87% of the variance in the five indices with demand intensity and Omax loading onto amplitude and Omax, Pmax, breakpoint, and elasticity loading onto persistence. Backward elimination regression revealed a significant negative relationship between amplitude and persistence (i.e., lower amplitude and persistence scores predicted a higher likelihood of making at least one quit attempt upon learning of pregnancy). These results further support the utility of the CPT for experimentally examining individual differences in smoking among pregnant women in an efficient and ethical manner that does not involve exposing them to cigarette smoke. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
|
3
|
Thrailkill EA, DeSarno M, Higgins ST. Loss aversion and risk for cigarette smoking and other substance use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 232:109307. [PMID: 35093680 PMCID: PMC8887823 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cigarette smoking is among the leading preventable causes of global morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine whether individual differences in loss aversion, a bias in decision-making wherein losses are valued greater than gains, predicts smoking and other addiction risk. METHODS We recruited current daily cigarette smokers (n = 181; > 10 cigarettes per day) and never-smokers (n = 237; < 100 cigarettes lifetime) from the United States using Amazon Mechanical Turk. Groups were matched on gender, educational attainment, and age. All completed items related to current cigarette smoking, alcohol use, other drug use, sleep problems, and depressed mood, and task-based measures of loss aversion and delay discounting, a decision-making bias associated with cigarette smoking. RESULTS Smokers were less loss averse than never-smokers (F(1, 411) = 24.19, η2 = 0.02, p < .0001) even after accounting for delay discounting (F(1, 410) = 20.53, η2 = 0.02, p < .0001). Loss aversion was also a significant independent risk factor for alcohol (F(1, 410) = 21.47, η2 = 0.02, p < .0001) and other drug use (F(1, 410) = 54.12, η2 = 0.04, p < .0001), although not other behavioral-health conditions (i.e., sleep disturbance, depressed mood). Further analyses revealed that co-occurring low loss aversion and high delay discounting were independently associated with greater risk for all patterns of substance use. CONCLUSIONS Loss aversion was associated with current cigarette smoking and other substance use patterns independent of delay discounting. Loss aversion may warrant attention as a protective factor and potential target for preventive intervention for substance use and addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric A. Thrailkill
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Corresponding author. Eric A. Thrailkill, Departments of Psychological Science and Psychiatry, University of Vermont, 2 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, VT, 05405;
| | - Michael DeSarno
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Department of Biomedical Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Stephen T. Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Syan SK, González-Roz A, Amlung M, Sweet LH, MacKillop J. Delayed Reward Discounting as a Prognostic Factor for Smoking Cessation Treatment Outcome: A Systematic Review. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:1636-1645. [PMID: 33772298 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntab052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While large proportions of smokers attempt to quit, rates of relapse remain high and identification of valid prognostic markers is of high priority. Delayed reward discounting (DRD) is a behavioral economic index of impulsivity that has been associated with smoking cessation, albeit inconsistently. This systematic review sought to synthesize the empirical findings on DRD as a predictor of smoking cessation treatment outcome, to critically appraise the quality of the literature, and to propose directions for future research. AIMS AND METHODS A total of 734 articles were identified, yielding k = 14 studies that met the eligibility criteria. The Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool was used to assess methodological quality of the included studies. RESULTS Individual study methods were highly heterogeneous, including substantial variation in research design, DRD task, clinical subpopulation, and treatment format. The predominant finding was that steeper DRD (higher impulsivity) was associated with significantly worse smoking cessation outcomes (10/14 studies). Negative results tended to be in pregnant and adolescent subpopulations. The QUIPS results suggested low risk of bias across studies; 11/14 studies were rated as low risk of bias for 5/6 QUIPS domains. CONCLUSIONS This review revealed consistent low-bias evidence for impulsive DRD as a negative prognostic predictor of smoking cessation treatment outcome in adults. However, methodological heterogeneity was high, precluding meta-analysis and formal tests of small study bias. The prospects of targeting impulsive DRD as a potentially modifiable risk factor or providing targeted treatment for smokers exhibiting high levels of discounting are discussed. IMPLICATIONS These findings indicate consistent evidence for DRD as a negative prognostic factor for smoking cessation outcome in adults. As such, DRD may be a useful as a novel treatment target or for identifying high-risk populations requiring more intensive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina K Syan
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Alba González-Roz
- Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Majorca, Spain
| | - Michael Amlung
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,Cofrin Logan Center for Addiction Research and Treatment, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA
| | - Lawrence H Sweet
- Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
| | - James MacKillop
- Peter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University & St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bari AA, Sparks H, Levinson S, Wilson B, London ED, Langevin JP, Pouratian N. Amygdala Structural Connectivity Is Associated With Impulsive Choice and Difficulty Quitting Smoking. Front Behav Neurosci 2020; 14:117. [PMID: 32714164 PMCID: PMC7351509 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2020.00117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The amygdala is known to play a role in mediating emotion and possibly addiction. We used probabilistic tractography (PT) to evaluate whether structural connectivity of the amygdala to the brain reward network is associated with impulsive choice and tobacco smoking. Methods: Diffusion and structural MRI scans were obtained from 197 healthy subjects (45 with a history of tobacco smoking) randomly sampled from the Human Connectome database. PT was performed to assess amygdala connectivity with several brain regions. Seed masks were generated, and statistical maps of amygdala connectivity were derived. Connectivity results were correlated with a subject performance both on a delayed discounting task and whether they met specified criteria for difficulty quitting smoking. Results: Amygdala connectivity was spatially segregated, with the strongest connectivity to the hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), and brainstem. Connectivity with the hippocampus was associated with preference for larger delayed rewards, whereas connectivity with the OFC, rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC), and insula were associated with preference for smaller immediate rewards. Greater nicotine dependence with difficulty quitting was associated with less hippocampal and greater brainstem connectivity. Scores on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) correlated with rACC connectivity. Discussion: These findings highlight the importance of the amygdala-hippocampal-ACC network in the valuation of future rewards and substance dependence. These results will help to identify potential targets for neuromodulatory therapies for addiction and related disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ausaf A Bari
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Hiro Sparks
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Simon Levinson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Bayard Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Edythe D London
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jean-Philippe Langevin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Nader Pouratian
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nighbor TD, Zvorsky I, Kurti AN, Skelly JM, Bickel WK, Reed DD, Naudé GP, Higgins ST. Examining interrelationships between the Cigarette Purchase Task and delay discounting among pregnant women. J Exp Anal Behav 2019; 111:405-415. [PMID: 30681144 PMCID: PMC6508990 DOI: 10.1002/jeab.499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Two common behavioral economic simulation tasks used to study cigarette smoking are the Cigarette Purchase Task, a measure of cigarette demand, and delay discounting, a measure of the subjective value of rewards as a function of delays to delivery. Few studies have evaluated whether combining these tasks enhances understanding of smoking beyond either alone. The current study represents an initial evaluation of the intersection between cigarette demand indices and delay discounting among pregnant smokers by examining associations between these measures and whether a woman makes antepartum quit attempts before entering prenatal care (a reliable predictor of eventual quitting). Participants were 159 pregnant women enrolled in a smoking-cessation trial. Low O max and shallow discounting were each associated with antepartum quit attempts. Participants were next categorized into four subgroups (low O max , shallow discounting; low O max , steep discounting; high O max , shallow discounting; high O max , steep discounting) using median splits. Those with shallow discounting and low O max were more likely to have made quit attempts than each of the other three subgroups. That is, steep discounting appears to undermine the association of low O max and efforts to quit smoking during pregnancy while high O max overshadows any protective influence associated with shallow discounting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler D. Nighbor
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| | - Ivori Zvorsky
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Allison N. Kurti
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Joan M. Skelly
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont
| | - Warren K. Bickel
- Addiction Recovery Research Center, Virginia Tech Carillion Research Institute
| | - Derek D. Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | - Gideon P. Naudé
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | - Stephen T. Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barlow P, McKee M, Reeves A, Galea G, Stuckler D. Time-discounting and tobacco smoking: a systematic review and network analysis. Int J Epidemiol 2018; 46:860-869. [PMID: 27818375 PMCID: PMC5637946 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Tobacco smoking harms health, so why do people smoke and fail to quit? An explanation originating in behavioural economics suggests a role for time-discounting, which describes how the value of a reward, such as better health, decreases with delay to its receipt. A large number of studies test the relationship of time-discounting with tobacco outcomes but the temporal pattern of this relationship and its variation according to measurement methods remain unclear. We review the association between time-discounting and smoking across (i) the life course, from initiation to cessation, and (ii) diverse discount measures. Methods: We identified 69 relevant studies in Web of Science and PubMed. We synthesized findings across methodologies and evaluated discount measures, study quality and cross-disciplinary fertilization. Results: In 44 out of 54 studies, smokers more greatly discounted the future than non-smokers and, in longitudinal studies, higher discounting predicted future smoking. Smokers with lower time-discount rates achieved higher quit rates. Findings were consistent across studies measuring discount rates using hypothetical monetary or cigarette reward scenarios. The methodological quality of the majority of studies was rated as ‘moderate’ and co-citation analysis revealed an isolation of economics journals and a dearth of studies in public health. Conclusion: There is moderate yet consistent evidence that high time-discounting is a risk factor for smoking and unsuccessful cessation. Policy scenarios assuming a flat rate of population discounting may inadequately capture smokers’ perceptions of costs and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pepita Barlow
- Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Aaron Reeves
- International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK
| | - Gauden Galea
- Division of Noncommunicable Diseases and Life-course, Regional Office for Europe, World Health OrganizationCopenhagen, Denmark
| | - David Stuckler
- Department of Sociology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Saliva Cotinine as a Measure of Smoking Abstinence in Contingency Management – A Feasibility Study. PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s40732-017-0240-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
9
|
Chamberlain C, O'Mara‐Eves A, Porter J, Coleman T, Perlen SM, Thomas J, McKenzie JE. Psychosocial interventions for supporting women to stop smoking in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 2:CD001055. [PMID: 28196405 PMCID: PMC6472671 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001055.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco smoking remains one of the few preventable factors associated with complications in pregnancy, and has serious long-term implications for women and babies. Smoking in pregnancy is decreasing in high-income countries, but is strongly associated with poverty and is increasing in low- to middle-income countries. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy on smoking behaviour and perinatal health outcomes. SEARCH METHODS In this sixth update, we searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (13 November 2015), checked reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted trial authors. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials, cluster-randomised trials, and quasi-randomised controlled trials of psychosocial smoking cessation interventions during pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and trial quality, and extracted data. Direct comparisons were conducted in RevMan, with meta-regression conducted in STATA 14. MAIN RESULTS The overall quality of evidence was moderate to high, with reductions in confidence due to imprecision and heterogeneity for some outcomes. One hundred and two trials with 120 intervention arms (studies) were included, with 88 trials (involving over 28,000 women) providing data on smoking abstinence in late pregnancy. Interventions were categorised as counselling, health education, feedback, incentives, social support, exercise and dissemination.In separate comparisons, there is high-quality evidence that counselling increased smoking cessation in late pregnancy compared with usual care (30 studies; average risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19 to 1.73) and less intensive interventions (18 studies; average RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47). There was uncertainty whether counselling increased the chance of smoking cessation when provided as one component of a broader maternal health intervention or comparing one type of counselling with another. In studies comparing counselling and usual care (largest comparison), it was unclear whether interventions prevented smoking relapse among women who had stopped smoking spontaneously in early pregnancy. However, a clear effect was seen in smoking abstinence at zero to five months postpartum (11 studies; average RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.26 to 2.01) and 12 to 17 months (two studies, average RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.23 to 3.96), with a borderline effect at six to 11 months (six studies; average RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.77). In other comparisons, the effect was unclear for most secondary outcomes, but sample sizes were small.Evidence suggests a borderline effect of health education compared with usual care (five studies; average RR 1.59, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.55), but the quality was downgraded to moderate as the effect was unclear when compared with less intensive interventions (four studies; average RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.70), alternative interventions (one study; RR 1.88, 95% CI 0.19 to 18.60), or when smoking cessation health education was provided as one component of a broader maternal health intervention.There was evidence feedback increased smoking cessation when compared with usual care and provided in conjunction with other strategies, such as counselling (average RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.89 to 10.21), but the confidence in the quality of evidence was downgraded to moderate as this was based on only two studies and the effect was uncertain when feedback was compared to less intensive interventions (three studies; average RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.20).High-quality evidence suggests incentive-based interventions are effective when compared with an alternative (non-contingent incentive) intervention (four studies; RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.09). However pooled effects were not calculable for comparisons with usual care or less intensive interventions (substantial heterogeneity, I2 = 93%).High-quality evidence suggests the effect is unclear in social support interventions provided by peers (six studies; average RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.98 to 2.07), in a single trial of support provided by partners, or when social support for smoking cessation was provided as part of a broader intervention to improve maternal health.The effect was unclear in single interventions of exercise compared to usual care (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.01) and dissemination of counselling (RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.62 to 4.32).Importantly, high-quality evidence from pooled results demonstrated that women who received psychosocial interventions had a 17% reduction in infants born with low birthweight, a significantly higher mean birthweight (mean difference (MD) 55.60 g, 95% CI 29.82 to 81.38 g higher) and a 22% reduction in neonatal intensive care admissions. However the difference in preterm births and stillbirths was unclear. There did not appear to be adverse psychological effects from the interventions.The intensity of support women received in both the intervention and comparison groups has increased over time, with higher-intensity interventions more likely to have higher-intensity comparisons, potentially explaining why no clear differences were seen with increasing intervention intensity in meta-regression analyses. Among meta-regression analyses: studies classified as having 'unclear' implementation and unequal baseline characteristics were less effective than other studies. There was no clear difference between trials implemented by researchers (efficacy studies), and those implemented by routine pregnancy staff (effectiveness studies), however there was uncertainty in the effectiveness of counselling in four dissemination trials where the focus on the intervention was at an organisational level. The pooled effects were similar in interventions provided for women classified as having predominantly low socio-economic status, compared to other women. The effect was significant in interventions among women from ethnic minority groups; however not among indigenous women. There were similar effect sizes in trials with biochemically validated smoking abstinence and those with self-reported abstinence. It was unclear whether incorporating use of self-help manuals or telephone support increased the effectiveness of interventions. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Psychosocial interventions to support women to stop smoking in pregnancy can increase the proportion of women who stop smoking in late pregnancy and the proportion of infants born low birthweight. Counselling, feedback and incentives appear to be effective, however the characteristics and context of the interventions should be carefully considered. The effect of health education and social support is less clear. New trials have been published during the preparation of this review and will be included in the next update.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Chamberlain
- La Trobe UniversityJudith Lumley Centre251 Faraday StreetMelbourneVicAustralia3000
- University of MelbourneMelbourne School of Population and Global HealthMelbourneAustralia
- Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMelbourneAustralia
- Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteHealthy Mothers Healthy Families Research GroupMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - Alison O'Mara‐Eves
- University College LondonEPPI‐Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education18 Woburn SquareLondonUKWC1H 0NR
| | - Jessie Porter
- University of MelbourneMelbourne School of Population and Global HealthMelbourneAustralia
| | - Tim Coleman
- University of NottinghamDivision of Primary CareD1411, Medical SchoolQueen's Medical CentreNottinghamUKNG7 2UH
| | - Susan M Perlen
- Murdoch Childrens Research InstituteHealthy Mothers Healthy Families Research GroupMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3052
| | - James Thomas
- University College LondonEPPI‐Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education18 Woburn SquareLondonUKWC1H 0NR
| | - Joanne E McKenzie
- Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Higgins ST, Reed DD, Redner R, Skelly JM, Zvorsky IA, Kurti AN. Simulating demand for cigarettes among pregnant women: A Low-Risk method for studying vulnerable populations. J Exp Anal Behav 2016; 107:176-190. [PMID: 28000917 DOI: 10.1002/jeab.232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
A substantive obstacle to experimentally studying cigarette smoking and use of other tobacco products in pregnant women is the risk of adverse effects on mother and fetus from experimenter administration of the product of interest. The purpose of this study is to investigate bypassing that obstacle by using behavioral economic simulation tasks. In the present study we used the Cigarette Purchase Task (CPT) to simulate changes in demand for hypothetical cigarettes as a function of varying cigarette prices. Participants were 95 pregnant women who completed the CPT prior to participation in a smoking-cessation trial. Aggregate and individual participant demand varied as an orderly function of price and those changes were well fitted by an exponential equation. Demand also varied in correspondence to two well-validated predictors of individual differences in smoking cessation among pregnant women (cigarettes smoked per day, pre-pregnancy quit attempts). Moreover, CPT indices were more effective than these two conventional variables in predicting individual differences in whether women made a quit attempt during the current pregnancy. Overall, these results represent a promising step in demonstrating the validity and utility of the CPT for experimentally examining demand for cigarettes, and potentially other tobacco and nicotine delivery products, among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health.,Department of Psychiatry, University of vermont.,Department Of Psychological Science, University Of Vermont
| | - Derek D Reed
- Department of Applied Behavioral Science, University of Kansas
| | - Ryan Redner
- Behavior Analysis and Therapy Program, Rehabilitation Institute Southern Illinois University
| | - Joan M Skelly
- Department Of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont
| | - Ivori A Zvorsky
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health.,Department Of Psychological Science, University Of Vermont
| | - Allison N Kurti
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health.,Department of Psychiatry, University of vermont
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bickel WK, Moody L, Higgins ST. Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change. Prev Med 2016; 92:16-23. [PMID: 27283095 PMCID: PMC5085840 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2016] [Accepted: 06/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Health-related behaviors such as tobacco, alcohol and other substance use, poor diet and physical inactivity, and risky sexual practices are important targets for research and intervention. Health-related behaviors are especially pertinent targets in the United States, which lags behind most other developed nations on common markers of population health. In this essay we examine the application of behavioral economics, a scientific discipline that represents the intersection of economics and psychology, to the study and promotion of health-related behavior change. More specifically, we review what we consider to be some core dimensions of this discipline when applied to the study health-related behavior change. Behavioral economics (1) provides novel conceptual systems to inform scientific understanding of health behaviors, (2) translates scientific understanding into practical and effective behavior-change interventions, (3) leverages varied aspects of behavior change beyond increases or decreases in frequency, (4) recognizes and exploits trans-disease processes and interventions, and (5) leverages technology in efforts to maximize efficacy, cost effectiveness, and reach. These dimensions are overviewed and their implications for the future of the field discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warren K Bickel
- Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Roanoke, VA, USA.
| | - Lara Moody
- Virginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Department of Psychology, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA; University of Vermont, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Higgins ST, Solomon LJ. Some Recent Developments on Financial Incentives for Smoking Cessation Among Pregnant and Newly Postpartum Women. CURRENT ADDICTION REPORTS 2016; 3:9-18. [PMID: 27158581 DOI: 10.1007/s40429-016-0092-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Smoking during pregnancy is a leading preventable cause of poor pregnancy outcomes and immediate and longer-term adverse health outcomes among exposed offspring. Developing more effective smoking-cessation interventions for pregnant women has been a public-health priority for more than thirty years. We review developments over the past three years (2012-15) on the use of financial incentives to promote smoking cessation among pregnant women. We searched the literature for reports on primary and secondary analyses and reviews of controlled trials on this topic published in peer-reviewed journals using the search engine PubMed, reviewed bibliographies of published articles, and consulted expert colleagues. The search revealed several important developments, with the following three being especially noteworthy. First, the review identified four new randomized controlled trials, three of which further supported the efficacy of this treatment approach. One of the three trials supporting efficacy also included the first econometric analysis of this treatment approach showing financial incentives with pregnant smokers to be highly cost-effective. Second, two Cochrane reviews were published during this 3-year period covering the more recent and earlier efficacy trials. Meta-analyses in both reviews supported the efficacy of the approach. Lastly, the first effectiveness trial was reported demonstrating that financial incentives increased abstinence rates above control levels when implemented by obstetrical clinic staff in a large urban hospital working with community tobacco interventionists. Overall, there is a growing and compelling body of evidence supporting the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of financial incentives for smoking cessation among pregnant women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen T Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont; Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont
| | - Laura J Solomon
- Department of Psychological Science, University of Vermont; Department of Family Practice, University of Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kurti AN, Davis DR, Skelly JM, Redner R, Higgins ST. Comparison of nicotine dependence indicators in predicting quitting among pregnant smokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2016; 24:12-7. [PMID: 27046504 PMCID: PMC4822339 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Research in the general population of smokers indicates that across various measures of nicotine dependence, time to first cigarette (TTFC) is the strongest single-item predictor of quitting success. Whether those findings generalize to pregnant smokers is unclear. To investigate this matter, we compared TTFC with cigarettes per day (CPD) and the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI; Kozlowski, Porter, Orleans, Pope, & Heatherton, 1994) in predicting late-pregnancy abstinence among 289 pregnant women enrolled in 4 smoking-cessation trials assessing the efficacy of financial incentives. Logistic regression was used to compare predictors, with model fit measured using the c statistic (range = 0.5, poor prediction to 1.0, perfect prediction). In simple regressions, model fit was comparable across the 3 measures although strongest for CPD alone (c = 0.70, 0.68, 0.66 for CPD, HSI, and TTFC, respectively). In a stepwise multiple regression, treatment was entered first (c = 0.67), then CPD (c = 0.77), quit attempts prepregnancy (c = .81), TTFC (c = .82), and quit attempts during pregnancy (c = .83). We saw no evidence supporting TTFC as the optimal predictor of quitting among pregnant smokers. Instead, the evidence supported using CPD and TTFC together or CPD alone if using only a single predictor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison N. Kurti
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| | - Danielle R. Davis
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont,Department of Psychology, University of Vermont
| | - Joan M. Skelly
- Department of Medical Biostatistics, University of Vermont
| | - Ryan Redner
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont
| | - Stephen T. Higgins
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont,Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont,Department of Psychology, University of Vermont
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
HIGGINS STEPHENT, HEIL SARAHH. Continuing efforts to improve cessation outcomes with pregnant cigarette smokers. Addiction 2015; 110:690-2. [PMID: 25771694 PMCID: PMC4412735 DOI: 10.1111/add.12852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 01/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- STEPHEN T. HIGGINS
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,University of Vermont, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology
| | - SARAH H. HEIL
- Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA,University of Vermont, Departments of Psychiatry and Psychology
| |
Collapse
|