Providers' Perceptions of Couples' HIV Testing and Counseling (CHTC): Perspectives From a U.S. HIV Epicenter

Behavioral and social interventions to promote optimal HIV prevention and care continua outcomes in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review reports on trends in behavioral and social intervention research in the United States published over the past year (2020-2021) investigating HIV prevention and care outcomes, organized by the level of intervention focus - individual, dyadic, and organizational.

RECENT FINDINGS

Researchers have continued to develop and evaluate behavioral and social interventions to reduce HIV acquisition risk and disease progression. With few exceptions, social and behavioral interventions have primarily focused on individuals as the unit of behavior change. Interventions operating at the individual-, dyadic-, and organizational-level have made strides to reduce HIV transmission risk and disease progressing by addressing mental health, substance use, stigma, peer and romantic relationships, and, to some extent, structural vulnerabilities.

SUMMARY

Social and behavioral interventions continue to be critical in addressing HIV inequities in the United States. An important gap in the literature is the need for multilevel interventions designed and implemented within existing community-based organizations and local healthcare settings. We call on researchers to continue to attend to the structural, environmental, and economic vulnerabilities that shape HIV inequities in the development of multilevel approaches necessary to realize the full potential of existing and emerging HIV prevention and care strategies.

A cluster randomized trial to reduce HIV risk from outside partnerships in Zambian HIV-Negative couples using a novel behavioral intervention, "Strengthening Our Vows": Study protocol and baseline data

BACKGROUND

Heterosexual couples contribute to most new HIV infections in areas of generalized HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. After Couples' Voluntary HIV Counseling and Testing (CVCT), heterosexual concordant HIV negative couples (CNC) in cohabiting unions contribute to approximately 47% of residual new infections in couples. These infections are attributed to concurrent sexual partners, a key driver of the HIV epidemic in Zambia.

METHODS/DESIGN

Ten Zambian government clinics in two of the largest cities were randomized in matched pairs to a Strengthening Our Vows (SOV) intervention or a Good Health Package (GHP) comparison arm. SOV addressed preventing HIV infection from concurrent partners and protecting spouses after exposures outside the relationship. GHP focused on handwashing; water chlorination; household deworming; and screening for hypertension, diabetes and schistosomiasis. CNC were referred from CVCT services in government clinics. Follow-up includes post-intervention questionnaires and outcome assessments through 60 months. Longitudinal outcomes of interest include self-report and laboratory markers of condomless sex with outside partners and reported sexual agreements. We present baseline characteristics and factors associated with study arm and reported risk using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

The mean age of men was 32 and 26 for women. On average, couples cohabited for 6 years and had 2 children. Baseline analyses demonstrated some failures of randomization by study arm which will be considered in future primary analyses of longitudinal data. An HIV/STI risk factor composite was not different in the two study arms. Almost one-quarter of couples had an HIV risk factor at baseline.

DISCUSSION

In preparation for future biomedical and behavioral interventions in sub-Saharan Africa, it is critical to understand and decrease HIV risk within CNC.

Reducing HIV Risk Behaviors Among Black Women Living With and Without HIV/AIDS in the U.S.: A Systematic Review

This systematic review provides an examination of the status of HIV/AIDS prevention interventions for Black, heterosexual women in the U.S. from 2012 to 2019. Using PRISMA guidelines, 28 interventions were identified. Over half of the interventions were: conducted in the southern region of the U.S.; evaluated using a randomized controlled trial; focused on adults; used a group-based intervention delivery; were behaviorally focused and theoretically driven. None included biomedical strategies of PrEP, nPEP, and TasP. Few interventions included adolescent or aging Black women; none included their sex/romantic partners. Future studies dedicated to addressing the specific needs of subpopulations of Black, heterosexual women may provide opportunities to expand and/or tailor current and future HIV/AIDS prevention interventions, including offering participants with options to choose which, and the level of involvement, of their sex/romantic partner(s) in their sexual health decision-making. While strides to improve HIV prevention efforts with Black, heterosexual women have occurred, more is needed.

The Influence of Relationship Dynamics and Sexual Agreements on Perceived Partner Support and Benefit of PrEP Use Among Same-Sex Male Couples in the U.S

Use of Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention by men who have sex with men (MSM) may be impacted by relationship dynamics. We assessed perceived partner support of PrEP use and benefit of PrEP by relationship characteristics among male couples. Baseline data from a randomized control trial of video-based HIV counseling and testing among male couples in the U.S. were used in adjusted multilevel regression models to assess individual and dyadic characteristics. Among 659 participants, 73.3% thought their partner would be supportive of their PrEP use; 26.7% reported their partner would not support PrEP use, which was significantly associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) (p = 0.008). Most (57.7%) did not believe PrEP would be beneficial to them or their partner. Couples with a sexual agreement allowing outside partners were significantly associated with higher perceived support of partners for PrEP (p < 0.001) and benefit of PrEP use (p < 0.001). Perceived partner support of PrEP was high but perceived benefit of PrEP was low, both shaped by relationship dynamics that highlight the need for tailored dyadic interventions. The association between perceived PrEP support and IPV points to the need to integrate relationship contexts in HIV prevention programs.

Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Couples' HIV Testing and Counseling in U.S. Clinical Settings: Perspectives From U.S. Health Providers

We used a qualitative descriptive design to ascertain perceived facilitators and barriers to couples' HIV testing and counseling (CHTC) by U.S. health care providers. We recruited 22 providers from 4 health care facilities in Miami-Dade County, FL, from November 2015 to March 2016. In-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted. Content analysis categorized and contextualized provider narratives. Perceived facilitators of CHTC were provider experiences with couple-centered HIV-related care, existing patient or client demands for joint HIV screening, and a health care practice environment that fosters an interprofessional approach to addressing client needs. Perceived barriers were partner unwillingness to undergo HIV screening, provider role beliefs and preferences regarding couple-based approaches, and provider time constraints in tandem with funding and billing issues. Overall, providers endorsed CHTC and thought that current challenges and successes with couple-based efforts and HIV screening and care could influence CHTC implementation. Provider recommendations are discussed.

Rectal Douching and Microbicide Acceptability among Young Men who Have Sex with Men

Men who have sex with men (MSM) commonly report engaging in rectal douching (RD) practices prior to receptive anal intercourse. Researchers are interested in the possibility of designing a RD with a microbicide component. In our analyses, we examined whether YMSM who engaged in RD behaviors differ in HIV prevention behaviors from their non-RD peers. We then examined whether RD frequency was associated with rectal microbicide acceptability. Half the participants (47.8%) reported having ever douched. Participants were more likely to douche if they were racial/ethnic minorities (AOR = 2.24, p = 0.02) and had recently tested for HIV (AOR = 1.96, p = 0.04). Greater douching frequency was associated with racial/ethnic minorities (β = 0.20, p = 0.009) and recent HIV testing (β = 0.19, p < 0.01). Participants who reported frequently douching indicated greater microbicide acceptability (β = 0.32, p < 0.001). Designing behaviorally congruent products remains a priority in next generation Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) and a rectal douche might be an additional tool if found to be efficacious.