SEC65 gene product is a subunit of the yeast signal recognition particle required for its integrity

Improving recombinant protein production by yeast through genome-scale modeling using proteome constraints

Eukaryotic cells are used as cell factories to produce and secrete multitudes of recombinant pharmaceutical proteins, including several of the current top-selling drugs. Due to the essential role and complexity of the secretory pathway, improvement for recombinant protein production through metabolic engineering has traditionally been relatively ad-hoc; and a more systematic approach is required to generate novel design principles. Here, we present the proteome-constrained genome-scale protein secretory model of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae (pcSecYeast), which enables us to simulate and explain phenotypes caused by limited secretory capacity. We further apply the pcSecYeast model to predict overexpression targets for the production of several recombinant proteins. We experimentally validate many of the predicted targets for α-amylase production to demonstrate pcSecYeast application as a computational tool in guiding yeast engineering and improving recombinant protein production.

Due to the complexity of the protein secretory pathway, strategy suitable for the production of a certain recombination protein cannot be generalized. Here, the authors construct a proteome-constrained genome-scale protein secretory model for yeast and show its application in the production of different misfolded or recombinant proteins.

Filamentous fungi-like secretory pathway strayed in a yeast system: peculiarities of Yarrowia lipolytica secretory pathway underlying its extraordinary performance

Microbial production of secretory proteins constitutes one of the key branches of current industrial biotechnology, earning billion dollar (USD) revenues each year. That industrial branch strongly relies on fluent operation of the secretory machinery within a microbial cell. The secretory machinery, directing the nascent polypeptide to its final destination, constitutes a highly complex system located across the eukaryotic cell. Numerous molecular identities of diverse structure and function not only build the advanced network assisting folding, maturation and secretion of polypeptides but also serve as sensors and effectors of quality control points. All these events must be harmoniously orchestrated to enable fluent processing of the protein traffic. Availability of these elements is considered to be the limiting factor determining capacity of protein traffic, which is of crucial importance upon biotechnological production of secretory proteins. The main purpose of this work is to review and discuss findings concerning secretory machinery operating in a non-conventional yeast species, Yarrowia lipolytica, and to highlight peculiarities of this system prompting its use as the production host. The reviewed literature supports the thesis that secretory machinery in Y. lipolytica is characterized by significantly higher complexity than a canonical yeast protein secretion pathway, making it more similar to filamentous fungi-like systems in this regard.

Identification and evaluation of PCR reference genes for host and pathogen in sugarcane-Sporisorium scitamineum interaction system

BACKGROUND

Sugarcane (Saccharum L. plant) is an important crop for sugar and bio-energy production around the world. Among sugarcane diseases, smut caused by Sporisorium scitamineum is one of the major fungal diseases causing severe losses to the sugarcane industry. The use of PCR reference genes is essential to the normalization of data on gene expression involving the sugarcane-S. scitamineum interaction system; however, no report that addresses criteria in selecting these reference genes has been published to date.

RESULTS

In this study, 10 sugarcane genes and eight S. scitamineum genes were selected as candidate PCR reference genes in the sugarcane-S. scitamineum interaction system. The stability and reliability of these 18 candidate genes were analyzed in smut-resistant (NCo376) and -susceptible (YC71-374) genotypes using the statistical algorithms geNorm, NormFinder, BestKeeper, and deltaCt method. Subsequently, the relative expression levels of the sugarcane chitinase I-3 gene and S. scitamineum chorismate mutase gene were determined to validate the applicability of these sugarcane and S. scitamineum PCR reference genes, respectively. We finally found that the acyl-CoA dehydrogenase gene (ACAD), serine/arginine repetitive matrix protein 1 gene (SARMp1), or their combination (ACAD + SARMp1) could be utilized as the most suitable reference genes for normalization of sugarcane gene expression in sugarcane bud tissues after S. scitamineum infection. Similarly, the inosine 5'-monophosphate dehydrogenase gene (S10), the SEC65-signal recognition particle subunit gene (S11), or their combination (S10 + S11) were suitable for normalization of S. scitamineum gene expression in sugarcane bud tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

The PCR reference genes ACAD, SARMp1, S10, and S11 may be employed in gene transcriptional studies involving the sugarcane-S. scitamineum interaction system.

Protein transport into the human endoplasmic reticulum

Protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is essential for all eukaryotic cells and evolutionary related to protein transport into and across the cytoplasmic membrane of eubacteria and archaea. It is based on amino-terminal signal peptides in the precursor polypeptides plus various transport components in cytosol plus ER and can occur either cotranslationally or posttranslationally. The two mechanisms merge at the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex in the ER membrane, which forms an aqueous polypeptide-conducting channel. Since the mammalian ER is also the main intracellular calcium storage organelle, the Sec61 complex is tightly regulated in its dynamics between the open and closed conformations by various ligands, such as precursor polypeptides at the cytosolic face and the Hsp70-type molecular chaperone BiP at the ER lumenal face (Hsp, heat shock protein). Furthermore, BiP binding to the incoming precursor polypeptide contributes to unidirectionality and efficiency of transport. Recent insights into the structural dynamics of the Sec61 complex and related complexes in eubacteria and archaea have various mechanistic and functional implications.

Secretory protein biogenesis and traffic in the early secretory pathway

The secretory pathway is responsible for the synthesis, folding, and delivery of a diverse array of cellular proteins. Secretory protein synthesis begins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), which is charged with the tasks of correctly integrating nascent proteins and ensuring correct post-translational modification and folding. Once ready for forward traffic, proteins are captured into ER-derived transport vesicles that form through the action of the COPII coat. COPII-coated vesicles are delivered to the early Golgi via distinct tethering and fusion machineries. Escaped ER residents and other cycling transport machinery components are returned to the ER via COPI-coated vesicles, which undergo similar tethering and fusion reactions. Ultimately, organelle structure, function, and cell homeostasis are maintained by modulating protein and lipid flux through the early secretory pathway. In the last decade, structural and mechanistic studies have added greatly to the strong foundation of yeast genetics on which this field was built. Here we discuss the key players that mediate secretory protein biogenesis and trafficking, highlighting recent advances that have deepened our understanding of the complexity of this conserved and essential process.

Heterozygous yeast deletion collection screens reveal essential targets of Hsp90

Hsp90 is an essential eukaryotic chaperone with a role in folding specific “client” proteins such as kinases and hormone receptors. Previously performed homozygous diploid yeast deletion collection screens uncovered broad requirements for Hsp90 in cellular transport and cell cycle progression. These screens also revealed that the requisite cellular functions of Hsp90 change with growth temperature. We present here for the first time the results of heterozygous deletion collection screens conducted at the hypothermic stress temperature of 15°C. Extensive bioinformatic analyses were performed on the resulting data in combination with data from homozygous and heterozygous screens previously conducted at normal (30°C) and hyperthermic stress (37°C) growth temperatures. Our resulting meta-analysis uncovered extensive connections between Hsp90 and (1) general transcription, (2) ribosome biogenesis and (3) GTP binding proteins. Predictions from bioinformatic analyses were tested experimentally, supporting a role for Hsp90 in ribosome stability. Importantly, the integrated analysis of the 15°C heterozygous deletion pool screen with previously conducted 30°C and 37°C screens allows for essential genetic targets of Hsp90 to emerge. Altogether, these novel contributions enable a more complete picture of essential Hsp90 functions.

Protein translocation across the ER membrane

Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the first and decisive step in the biogenesis of most extracellular and many soluble organelle proteins in eukaryotic cells. It is mechanistically related to protein export from eubacteria and archaea and to the integration of newly synthesized membrane proteins into the ER membrane and the plasma membranes of eubacteria and archaea (with the exception of tail anchored membrane proteins). Typically, protein translocation into the ER involves cleavable amino terminal signal peptides in precursor proteins and sophisticated transport machinery components in the cytosol, the ER membrane, and the ER lumen. Depending on the hydrophobicity and/or overall amino acid content of the precursor protein, transport can occur co- or posttranslationally. The respective mechanism determines the requirements for certain cytosolic transport components. The two mechanisms merge at the level of the ER membrane, specifically, at the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex present in the membrane. The Sec61 complex provides a signal peptide recognition site and forms a polypeptide conducting channel. Apparently, the Sec61 complex is gated by various ligands, such as signal peptides of the transport substrates, ribosomes (in cotranslational transport), and the ER lumenal molecular chaperone, BiP. Binding of BiP to the incoming polypeptide contributes to efficiency and unidirectionality of transport. Recent insights into the structure of the Sec61 complex and the comparison of the transport mechanisms and machineries in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the human parasite Trypanosoma brucei, and mammals have various important mechanistic as well as potential medical implications. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Protein translocation across or insertion into membranes.

Translocation of proteins across archaeal cytoplasmic membranes

All cells need to transport proteins across hydrophobic membranes. Several mechanisms have evolved to facilitate this transport, including: (i) the universally-conserved Sec system, which transports proteins in an unfolded conformation and is thought to be the major translocation pathway in most organisms and (ii) the Tat system, which transports proteins that have already obtained some degree of tertiary structure. Here, we present the current understanding of these processes in the domain Archaea, and how they compare to the corresponding pathways in bacteria and eukaryotes.

Nuclear export of yeast signal recognition particle lacking Srp54p by the Xpo1p/Crm1p NES-dependent pathway

BACKGROUND

The movement of macromolecules through the nuclear pores requires energy and transport receptors that bind both cargo and nuclear pores. Different molecules/complexes often require different transport receptors. The signal recognition particle (SRP) is a conserved cytosolic ribonucleoprotein that targets proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. Previous studies have shown that the export of SRP RNA from the nucleus requires trans-acting factors and that SRP may be at least partly assembled in the nucleus, but little else is known about how it is assembled and exported into the cytoplasm.

RESULTS

Of the six proteins that constitute the yeast SRP, we found that all except Srp54p were imported into the nucleus. Four of these had nucleolar pools. The same four proteins are required for stability of the yeast SRP RNA scR1, suggesting that they assemble with the RNA in the nucleus to form a central core SRP. This core SRP was a competent export substrate. Of the remaining components, Sec65p entered the nucleus and was assembled onto the core particle there, whereas Srp54p was solely cytoplasmic. The export of SRP from the nucleus required the transport receptor Xpo1p/Crm1p and Yrb2p, both components of the pathway that exports leucine-rich nuclear export signal (NES)-containing proteins from the nucleus.

CONCLUSIONS

The SRP is assembled in the nucleus into a complex lacking only Srp54p. It is then exported through the NES pathway into the cytoplasm where Srp54p binds to it. This transport route for a ribonucleoprotein complex is so far unique in yeast.

Current awareness on yeast

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, this current awareness service is provided by John Wiley & Sons and contains newly-published material on yeasts. Each bibliography is divided into 10 sections. 1 Books, Reviews & Symposia; 2 General; 3 Biochemistry; 4 Biotechnology; 5 Cell Biology; 6 Gene Expression; 7 Genetics; 8 Physiology; 9 Medical Mycology; 10 Recombinant DNA Technology. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted. (3 weeks journals - search completed 21st June 2000)

Elongation arrest is a physiologically important function of signal recognition particle

Signal recognition particle (SRP) targets proteins for co-translational insertion through or into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Mammalian SRP slows nascent chain elongation by the ribosome during targeting in vitro. This 'elongation arrest' activity requires the SRP9/14 subunit of the particle and interactions of the C-terminus of SRP14. We have purified SRP from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and demonstrated that it too has elongation arrest activity. A yeast SRP containing Srp14p truncated at its C-terminus (delta C29) did not maintain elongation arrest, was substantially deficient in promoting translocation and interfered with targeting by wild-type SRP. In vivo, this mutation conferred a constitutive defect in the coupling of protein translation and translocation and temperature-sensitive growth, but only a slight defect in protein translocation. In combination, these data indicate that the primary defect in SRP delta C29 is in elongation arrest, and that this is a physiologically important and conserved function of eukaryotic SRP.

Deletion analysis of yeast Sec65p reveals a central domain that is sufficient for function in vivo

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SEC65 gene encodes a 32 kDa subunit of yeast signal recognition particle that is homologous to human SRP19. Sequence comparisons suggest that the yeast protein comprises three distinct domains. The central domain (residues 98-171) exhibits substantial sequence similarity to the 144 residue SRP19. In contrast, the N-terminal and C-terminal domains (residues 1-97 and 172-273 respectively) share no similarity to SRP19, with the exception of a cluster of positively charged residues at the extreme C-terminus of both proteins. Here, we report the cloning of a Sec65p homologue from the yeast Candida albicans that shares the same extended domain structure as its S. cerevisiae counterpart. This conservation of sequence is reflected at the functional level, as the C. albicans gene can complement the conditional lethal sec65-1 mutation in S. cerevisiae. In order to examine the role of the N- and C- terminal domains in Sec65p function, we have engineered truncation mutants of S. cerevisiae SEC65 and tested these for complementing activity in vivo and for SRP integrity in vitro. These studies indicate that a minimal Sec65p comprising residues 76-209, which includes the entire central SRP19-like domain, is sufficient for SRP function in yeast.

A yeast recombinant aquaporin mutant that is not expressed or mistargeted in Xenopus oocyte can be functionally analyzed in reconstituted proteoliposomes

We have recently identified AQPcic (for aquaporin cicadella), an insect aquaporin found in the digestive tract of homopteran insects and involved in the elimination of water ingested in excess with the dietary sap (Le Cahérec, F., Deschamps, S., Delamarche, C., Pellerin, I., Bonnec, G., Guillam, M. T., Gouranton, J., Thomas, D., and Hubert, J. F. (1996) Eur. J. Biochem. 241, 707-715). Like many other aquaporins, AQPcic is inhibited by mercury reagents. In this study, we have demonstrated that residue Cys82 is essential for mercury inhibition. Another mutant version of AQPcic (AQP-C134S), expression of which in Xenopus laevis failed to produce an active molecule, was successfully expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Using stopped-flow analysis of reconstituted proteoliposomes, we demonstrated that the biological activity and Hg sensitivity of yeast-expressed wild type and mutant type AQPcic was readily assessed. Therefore, we propose that the yeast system is a valid alternative to Xenopus oocytes for studying particular mutants of aquaporin.

Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Secretory protein biogenesis begins with the insertion of a preprotein into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This insertion event, known as ER protein translocation, can occur either posttranslationally, in which the preprotein is completely synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes before being translocated, or cotranslationally, in which membrane-associated ribosomes direct the nascent polypeptide chain into the ER concomitant with polypeptide elongation. In either case, preproteins are targeted to the ER membrane through specific interactions with cytosolic and/or ER membrane factors. The preprotein is then transferred to a multiprotein translocation machine in the ER membrane that includes a pore through which the preprotein passes into the ER lumen. The energy required to drive protein translocation may derive either from the coupling of translation to translocation (during cotranslational translocation) or from ER lumenal molecular chaperones that may harness the preprotein or regulate the translocation machinery (during posttranslational translocation).

Identification of an RNA-binding-loop in the N-terminal region of signal-recognition-particle protein SRP19

Protein SRP19 is a 144-amino-acid polypeptide that associates intimately with the signal-recognition particle RNA (SRP RNA) and serves as an important structural and functional component of the SRP. We investigated the structure and RNA-binding activity of the human SRP19 protein by the use of comparative sequence analysis, high-stringency structure prediction, proteolytic susceptibility, and site-directed mutagenesis. SRP19 was found to consist of two distinct regions (called N-terminal and C-terminal regions) that are separated by a boundary of approximately 12-15 amino acid residues. Both regions contain an alpha-helix and several beta-strands that are connected by loops or turns. In agreement with the hypothetical model, proteolytic susceptibility demonstrated the predominant accessibility of two sites: one in a surface loop of the N-terminal region (YLNNKKTIAEGR33), and another site in the C-terminal tail at residues L129 and E133. The RNA-binding activities of mutant polypeptides with changes of conserved lysines and arginines (mutants K27Q, R33Q and R34Q) demonstrated that the proteolytically accessible loop of the N-terminal region is in direct contact with the SRP RNA. In contrast, alteration of a certain basic amino acid residues in the C-terminal region (R83, K116 and R118), as well as a deletion of four amino acid residues located at the boundary between the two regions, had no effect on the RNA-binding ability. The structural model that emerges from our data is thematically similar to that of ribosomal protein S5, the N-domain of which contains a loop motif believed to interact with double-stranded RNA. The presence of a similar structural feature in protein SRP19 has significant implications for the structure and function of the SRP19-RNA complex.

Renal immunocytochemical distribution and pharmacological properties of the dual angiotensin II/AVP receptor

We have recently characterized a novel angiotensin II/vasopressin (Ang II/AVP) dual receptor coupled to adenylate cyclase and responding with equal sensitivity to Ang II and AVP. To gain insight into putative renal physiological roles of the dual Ang II/AVP receptor, we determined its pharmacological binding properties and renal immunocytochemical distribution. The effective displacement of [3H]AVP by [1-deamino-Val14,D-Arg8]-vasopressin (DVDAVP), a specific antidiuretic AVP analogue, supports a V2-type AVP receptor characteristic of the Ang II/AVP receptor. Displacement of 125I-Ang II by losartan but not by PD 123319 defines the Ang II/AVP receptor as a novel AT1 receptor isoform coupled to adenylate cyclase, in contrast to prototype Ca(2+)-mobilizing AT1 receptors. Neither Ang II nor AVP displace each other, corroborating the predicted discrete binding domains for Ang II and AVP but presenting an enigma for the dissection of putative Ang II- and AVP-specific hierarchical roles of the dual Ang II/AVP receptor. The renal cytolocalization of the Ang II/AVP receptor to the outer medullary thick ascending limb tubules and inner medullary collecting ducts is consistent with the well-established AVP stimulation of sodium and water reabsorption in these tubules. These data suggest that the Ang II/AVP receptor might provide the molecular basis for the observed similar stimulatory effects of Ang II and AVP on renal tubular sodium and fluid reabsorption at physiological hormone concentrations.

Protein targeting and translocation; a comparative survey

The last few years has seen enormous progress in understanding of protein targeting and translocation across biological membranes. Many of the key molecules involved have been identified, isolated, and the corresponding genes cloned, opening up the way for detailed analysis of the structure and function of these molecular machines. It has become clear that the protein translocation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum is very closely related to that of bacteria, and probably represents an ancient solution to the problem of how to get a protein across a membrane. One of the thylakoid translocation systems looks as if it will also be very similar, and probably represents a pathway inherited from the ancestral endosymbiont. It is interesting that, so far, there is a perfect correlation between thylakoid proteins which are present in photosynthetic prokaryotes and those which use the sec pathway in chloroplasts; conversely, OE16 and 23 which use the delta pH pathway are not found in cyanobacteria. To date, no Sec-related proteins have been found in mitochondria, although these organelles also arose as a result of endosymbiotic events. However, virtually nothing is known about the insertion of mitochondrially encoded proteins into the inner membrane. Is the inner membrane machinery which translocates cytoplasmically synthesized proteins capable of operating in reverse to export proteins from the matrix, or is there a separate system? Alternatively, do membrane proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA insert independently of accessory proteins? Unlike nuclear-encoded proteins, proteins encoded by mtDNA are not faced with a choice of membrane and, in principle, could simply partition into the inner membrane. The ancestors of mitochondria almost certainly had a Sec system; has this been lost along with many of the proteins once encoded in the endosymbiont genome, or is there still such a system waiting to be discovered? The answer to this question may also shed light on the controversy concerning the sorting of the inter-membrane space proteins cytochrome c1 and cytochrome b2, as the conservative-sorting hypothesis would predict re-export of matrix intermediates via an ancestral (possibly Sec-type) pathway. Whereas the ER and bacterial systems clearly share homologous proteins, the protein import machineries of mitochondria and chloroplasts appear to be analogous rather than homologous. In both cases, import occurs through contact sites and there are separate translocation complexes in each membrane, however, with the exception of some of the chaperone molecules, the individual protein components do not appear to be related. Their similarities may be a case of convergent rather than divergent evolution, and may reflect what appear to be common requirements for translocation, namely unfolding, a receptor, a pore complex and refolding. There are also important differences. Translocation across the mitochondrial inner membrane is absolutely dependent upon delta psi, but no GTP requirement has been identified. In chloroplasts the reverse is the case. The roles of delta psi and GTP, respectively, remain uncertain, but it is tempting to speculate that they may play a role in regulating the import process, perhaps by controlling the assembly of a functional translocation complex. In the case of peroxisomes, much still remains to be learned. Many genes involved in peroxisome biogenesis have been identified but, in most cases, the biochemical function remains to be elucidated. In this respect, understanding of peroxisome biogenesis is at a similar stage to that of the ER 10 years ago. The coming together of genetic and biochemical approaches, as with the other organelles, should provide many of the answers.

The TSR1 gene of Yarrowia lipolytica is involved in the signal recognition particle-dependent translocation pathway of secretory proteins

We have isolated suppressors (tsr1 to tsr5) of the thermosensitive growth of the scr2.II-13 mutation, which affects the stability of the signal recognition particle. The growth of these mutants is largely affected in the SCR2 context at 34 degrees C. We have studied the synthesis and secretion of an alkaline extracellular protease (AEP) in both wild-type and tsr1-1(SCR2(+)) thermosensitive mutant strains. Pulse-chase labeling and immunoprecipitation of this protein showed that the level of AEP precursors in the tsr1-1(SCR2(+)) strain is 70% less than in the wild-type strain under conditions where the global protein synthesis is practically unaffected. This defect was observed as early as 10 min after the shift to nonpermissive temperature. In neither strain was there any effect on the kinetics of secretion, and no cytoplasmic accumulation was detected. We have cloned the TSR1 gene by complementing the thermosensitive phenotype of a tsr1-1(SCR2(+)) mutant. Analysis of the TSR1 DNA sequence revealed an open reading frame of 1383 base pairs, encoding a serine-rich protein of 461 amino acids with an amino-terminal signal peptide, and a membrane-spanning domain of 20 amino acids that could act as a stop transfer signal to ensure membrane localization of Tsr1p. Two homologues of the TSR1 gene were identified in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (YHC8) and Hansenula polymorpha (YLU2). Disruption of the TSR1 gene revealed that it is an essential single-copy gene. The TSR1 gene encodes a single mRNA of 1.5 kilobase pairs. The study of the synthesis and secretion of AEP in the complemented tsr1-1(SCR2(+),TSR1(+)) strain revealed that the TSR1 gene ensures complete recovery of the synthesis defect and thus could encode an important component of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane involved in the early steps of the signal recognition particle-dependent translocation pathway.

Functional characterization of the 180-kD ribosome receptor in vivo

A cDNA encoding the 180-kD canine ribosome receptor (RRp) was cloned and sequenced. The deduced primary structure indicates three distinct domains: an NH2-terminal stretch of 28 uncharged amino acids representing the membrane anchor, a basic region (pI = 10.74) comprising the remainder of the NH2-terminal half and an acidic COOH-terminal half (pI = 4.99). The most striking feature of the amino acid sequence is a 10-amino acid consensus motif, NQGKKAEGAP, repeated 54 times in tandem without interruption in the NH2-terminal positively charged region. We postulate that this repeated sequence represents a ribosome binding domain which mediates the interaction between the ribosome and the ER membrane. To substantiate this hypothesis, recombinant full-length ribosome receptor and two truncated versions of this protein, one lacking the potential ribosome binding domain, and one lacking the COOH terminus, were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Morphological and biochemical analyses showed all proteins were targeted to, and oriented correctly in the ER membrane. In vitro ribosome binding assays demonstrated that yeast microsomes containing the full-length canine receptor or one lacking the COOH-terminal domain were able to bind two to four times as many human ribosomes as control membranes lacking a recombinant protein or microsomes containing a receptor lacking the NH2-terminal basic domain. Electron micrographs of these cells revealed that the expression of all receptor constructs led to a proliferation of perinuclear ER membranes known as "karmellae." Strikingly, in those strains which expressed cDNAs encoding a receptor containing the putative ribosome binding domain, the induced ER membranes (examined in situ) were richly studded with ribosomes. In contrast, karmellae resulting from the expression of receptor cDNA lacking the putative ribosome binding domain were uniformly smooth and free of ribosomes. Cell fractionation and biochemical analyses corroborated the morphological characterization. Taken together these data provide further evidence that RRp functions as a ribosome receptor in vitro, provide new evidence indicating its functionality in vivo, and in both cases indicate that the NH2-terminal basic domain is essential for ribosome binding.

SRP samples nascent chains for the presence of signal sequences by interacting with ribosomes at a discrete step during translation elongation

The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to ribosomes that synthesize nascent chains bearing signal sequences and catalyzes their targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. In S. cerevisiae, a temperature-sensitive mutation in the SEC65 gene, encoding an SRP subunit, results in lowered levels of SRP. Growth and protein translocation defects induced by this mutation can be suppressed specifically by sublethal doses of cycloheximide but not anisomycin, each inhibitors of different steps of translation elongation. Cycloheximide also suppresses protein translocation defects caused by depletion of a different SRP subunit. We propose that reduced elongation rates in the presence of cycloheximide allow otherwise insufficient SRP to interact efficiently with ribosomes. These results are consistent with a sampling model in which SRP cycles on and off of translating ribosomes at specific steps during the elongation cycle to inspect all nascent chains for the presence of signal sequences.

Signal recognition particle (SRP), a ubiquitous initiator of protein translocation

In higher eukaryotes, most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesised by ribosomes which are attached to the membrane of the rough endoplasmic reticulum (RER). This allows the proteins to be translocated across that membrane already during their synthesis. The ribosomes are directed to the RER membrane by a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein particle, the signal recognition particle (SRP). SRP fulfills its task by virtue of three distinguishable activities: the binding of a signal sequence which, being part of the nascent polypeptide to be translocated, is exposed on the surface of a translating ribosome; the retardation of any further elongation; and the SRP-receptor-mediated binding of the complex of ribosome, nascent polypeptide and SRP to the RER membrane which results in the detachment of SRP from the signal sequence and the ribosome and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the membrane. Evidence is accumulating that SRP is not restricted to eukaryotes: SRP-related particles and SRP-receptor-related molecules are found ubiquitously and may function in protein translocation in every living organism. This review focuses on the mammalian SRP. A brief discussion of its overall structure is followed by a detailed description of the structures of its RNA and protein constituents and the requirements for their assembly into the particle. Homologues of SRP components from organisms other than mammals are mentioned to emphasize the components' conserved or less conserved features. Subsequently, the functions of each of the SRP constituents are discussed. This sets the stage for a presentation of a model for the mechanism by which SRP cyclically assembles and disassembles with translating ribosomes and the RER membrane. It may be expected that similar mechanisms are used by SRP homologues in organisms other than mammals. However, the mammalian SRP-mediated translocation mechanism may not be conserved in its entirety in organisms like Escherichia coli whose SRP lack components required for the function of the mammalian SRP. Possible translocation pathways involving the rudimentary SRP are discussed in view of the existence of alternative, chaperone-mediated translocation pathways with which they may intersect. The concluding two sections deal with open questions in two areas of SRP research. One formulates basic questions regarding the little-investigated biogenesis of SRP. The other gives an outlook over the insights into the mechanisms of each of the known activities of the SRP that are to be expected in the short and medium-term future.

Nonlethal sec71-1 and sec72-1 mutations eliminate proteins associated with the Sec63p-BiP complex from S. cerevisiae

The sec71-1 and sec72-1 mutations were identified by a genetic assay that monitored membrane protein integration into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The mutations inhibited integration of various chimeric membrane proteins and translocation of a subset of water soluble proteins. In this paper we show that SEC71 encodes the 31.5-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein (p31.5) and SEC72 encodes the 23-kDa protein (p23) of the Sec63p-BiP complex. SEC71 is therefore identical to SEC66 (HSS1), which was previously shown to encode p31.5. DNA sequence analyses reveal that sec71-1 cells contain a nonsense mutation that removes approximately two-thirds of the cytoplasmic C-terminal domain of p31.5. The sec72-1 mutation shifts the reading frame of the gene encoding p23. Unexpectedly, the sec71-1 mutant lacks p31.5 and p23. Neither mutation is lethal, although sec71-1 cells exhibit a growth defect at 37 degrees C. These results show that p31.5 and p23 are important for the trafficking of a subset of proteins to the ER membrane.

Site-directed mutagenesis of signal-recognition particle RNA. Identification of the nucleotides in helix 8 required for interaction with protein SRP19

The RNA component of signal recognition particle (SRP) consists of eight helices which form a functional unit with the proteins of the SRP. The primary binding site of the 19-kDa protein of SRP (SRP19) is a tetranucleotide loop (tetraloop) in helix 6 of the SRP RNA, but additional determinants are located in helix 8, which might play important roles in the assembly and the function of the particle. To determine the structural features in helix 8 essential for interaction with SRP19, we altered helix 8 systematically by site-directed mutagenesis, and determined the ability of protein SRP19 to interact with the various mutant SRP RNAs. Binding of SRP19 was affected by base changes introduced into the 5' portion (192A, 193G, 194G in the human SRP RNA), but not into the 3' portion (205 A, 206G, 207C) of the distally located conserved internal loop of helix 8. Of the three bases at positions 192-194, only a pyrimidine at position 192 impaired the association with SPR19. An important feature of the SRP19-RNA interaction were the three base pairs U195-G204, C196-G203 and G197-C202 which shape the helix-8 tetraloop. Some base-specific features in the base pairs were also recognized. The tetraloop bases of helix 8 were dispensable for the interaction with SRP19.

Molecular evolution of SRP cycle components: functional implications

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein that targets a subset of nascent presecretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. We have considered the SRP cycle from the perspective of molecular evolution, using recently determined sequences of genes or cDNAs encoding homologs of SRP (7SL) RNA, the Srp54 protein (Srp54p), and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha) from a broad spectrum of organisms, together with the remaining five polypeptides of mammalian SRP. Our analysis provides insight into the significance of structural variation in SRP RNA and identifies novel conserved motifs in protein components of this pathway. The lack of congruence between an established phylogenetic tree and size variation in 7SL homologs implies the occurrence of several independent events that eliminated more than half the sequence content of this RNA during bacterial evolution. The apparently non-essential structures are domain I, a tRNA-like element that is constant in archaea, varies in size among eucaryotes, and is generally missing in bacteria, and domain III, a tightly base-paired hairpin that is present in all eucaryotic and archeal SRP RNAs but is invariably absent in bacteria. Based on both structural and functional considerations, we propose that the conserved core of SRP consists minimally of the 54 kDa signal sequence-binding protein complexed with the loosely base-paired domain IV helix of SRP RNA, and is also likely to contain a homolog of the Srp68 protein. Comparative sequence analysis of the methionine-rich M domains from a diverse array of Srp54p homologs reveals an extended region of amino acid identity that resembles a recently identified RNA recognition motif. Multiple sequence alignment of the G domains of Srp54p and SR alpha homologs indicates that these two polypeptides exhibit significant similarity even outside the four GTPase consensus motifs, including a block of nine contiguous amino acids in a location analogous to the binding site of the guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (GDS) for E. coli EF-Tu. The conservation of this sequence, in combination with the results of earlier genetic and biochemical studies of the SRP cycle, leads us to hypothesize that a component of the Srp68/72p heterodimer serves as the GDS for both Srp54p and SR alpha. Using an iterative alignment procedure, we demonstrate similarity between Srp68p and sequence motifs conserved among GDS proteins for small Ras-related GTPases. The conservation of SRP cycle components in organisms from all three major branches of the phylogenetic tree suggests that this pathway for protein export is of ancient evolutionary origin.

A crucial role of the mitochondrial protein import receptor MOM19 for the biogenesis of mitochondria

The novel genetic method of "sheltered RIP" (repeat induced point mutation) was used to generate a Neurospora crassa mutant in which MOM19, a component of the protein import machinery of the mitochondrial outer membrane, can be depleted. Deficiency in MOM19 resulted in a severe growth defect, but the cells remained viable. The number of mitochondrial profiles was not grossly changed, but mutant mitochondria were highly deficient in cristae membranes, cytochromes, and protein synthesis activity. Protein import into isolated mutant mitochondria was decreased by factors of 6 to 30 for most proteins from all suborganellar compartments. Proteins like the ADP/ATP carrier, MOM19, and cytochrome c, whose import into wild-type mitochondria occurs independently of MOM19 became imported normally showing that the reduced import activities are solely caused by a lack of MOM19. Depletion of MOM19 reveals a close functional relationship between MOM19 and MOM22, since loss of MOM19 led to decreased levels of MOM22 and reduced protein import through MOM22. Furthermore, MOM72 does not function as a general backup receptor for MOM19 suggesting that these two proteins have distinct precursor specificities. These findings demonstrate that the import receptor MOM19 fulfills an important role in the biogenesis of mitochondria and that it is essential for the formation of mitochondria competent in respiration and phosphorylation.

Genetic interactions between KAR2 and SEC63, encoding eukaryotic homologues of DnaK and DnaJ in the endoplasmic reticulum

KAR2 encodes the yeast homologue of mammalian BiP, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) resident member of the HSP70 family. Kar2p has been shown to be required for the translocation of proteins across the ER membrane as well as nuclear fusion. Sec63, an ER integral membrane protein that shares homology with the Escherichia coli DnaJ protein, is also required for translocation. In this paper we describe several specific genetic interactions between these two proteins, Kar2p and Sec63p. First, temperature-sensitive mutations in KAR2 and SEC63 form synthetic lethal combinations. Second, dominant mutations in KAR2 are allele-specific suppressors for the temperature-sensitive growth and translocation defect of sec63-1. Third, the sec63-1, unlike other translocation defective mutations, results in the induction of KAR2 mRNA levels. Taken together, these genetic interactions suggest that Kar2p and Sec63p interact in vivo in a manner similar to that of the E. coli HSP70, DnaK, and DnaJ. We propose that the interaction between these two proteins is critical to their function in protein translocation.

Suppression of a sec63 mutation identifies a novel component of the yeast endoplasmic reticulum translocation apparatus

Mutations in the SEC63 gene are associated with defects in protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) as well as in nuclear protein localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. To identify proteins that might interact and/or function with SEC63p, we cloned a high copy suppressor (HSS1) of the temperature-sensitive lethal phenotype of the sec63-101 mutant. HSS1 is an allele-specific sec63 suppressor that encodes an integral ER membrane glycoprotein of 206 amino acids with the N-terminus in the ER lumen and C-terminal region in the cytoplasm. Haploid strains disrupted for HSS1 are temperature-sensitive for growth and accumulate precursor forms of Kar2p and invertase. The HSS1 null allele is synthetically lethal in combination with mutations affecting ER translocation. We propose that HSS1p is important for ER translocation and interacts with previously identified components of the yeast translocation apparatus. HSS1 is identical to SEC66, which encodes a glycoprotein complexed with SEC62p and SEC63p.

Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum

The past year has seen significant advances in the field of protein translocation: the roles of the signal recognition particle and its receptor have been understood in greater detail; many membrane components responsible for translocation have been identified; and insight has been gained into how proteins cross membranes.

Folding and intracellular transport of the yeast plasma-membrane H(+)-ATPase: effects of mutations in KAR2 and SEC65

We have developed two independent assays to study the integration, folding, and intracellular transport of the polytopic plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase in yeast. To follow folding, controlled trypsinolysis was used to distinguish between the E1 conformation of the ATPase (favored in the presence of ADP) and the E2 conformation (favored in the presence of vanadate). By this criterion, wild-type ATPase appears to recognize its ligands and assume distinct conformations within a short time after its biosynthesis. To follow intracellular transport, we have exploited the fact that export of newly synthesized ATPase from the endoplasmic reticulum is accompanied by kinase-mediated phosphorylation, leading to a shift in electrophoretic mobility. Because proper folding is required for transport from the endoplasmic reticulum, the mobility shift also serves as a convenient bioassay for correct folding. As a first step toward identifying cell components important in folding of the nascent ATPase, we have used the dual assays to examine the role of KAR2, encoding the yeast homolog of immunoglobulin heavy chain binding protein/78-kDa glucose-regulated protein, and SEC65, encoding a subunit of the yeast signal recognition particle. Although mutation of KAR2 caused defective translocation of several secretory precursors into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen, ATPase folding and intracellular transport were unperturbed. By contrast, in a sec65 mutant, the folding and intracellular transport of newly synthesized ATPase were delayed. Our data suggest that conformational maturation of the ATPase is a rapid process in wild-type cells and that membrane integration mediated by signal recognition peptide is important for the proper folding of this polytopic protein.

Identification of RNA sequences and structural elements required for assembly of fission yeast SRP54 protein with signal recognition particle RNA

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein composed of six polypeptides and a single RNA molecule. SRP RNA can be divided into four structural domains, the last of which is the most highly conserved and, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is the primary location to which deleterious mutations map. The ability of mammalian SRP54 protein (SRP54p) to bind Escherichia coli 4.5S RNA, a homolog of SRP RNA which contains only domain IV, suggested that SRP54p might interact directly with this region. To determine whether domain IV is critical for SRP54p binding in fission yeast cells, we used a native immunoprecipitation-RNA sequencing assay to test 13 mutant SRP RNAs for the ability to associate with the protein in vivo. The G156A mutation, which alters the 5' residue of the noncanonical first base pair of the domain IV terminal helix and confers a mild conditional growth defect, reduces assembly of the RNA with SRP54p. Mutating either of the two evolutionarily invariant residues in the bulged region 5' to G156 is more deleterious to growth and virtually abolishes SRP54p binding. We conclude that the conservation of nucleotides 154 to 156 is likely to be a consequence of their role as a sequence-specific recognition element for the SRP54 protein. We also tested a series of mutants with nucleotide substitutions in the conserved tetranucleotide loop and adjoining stem of domain IV. Although tetraloop mutations are deleterious to growth, they have little effect on SRP54p binding. Mutations which disrupt the base pair flanking the tetraloop result in conditional growth defects and significantly reduce association with SRP54p. Disruption of the other two base pairs in the short stem adjacent to the tetranucleotide loop has similar but less dramatic effects on SRP54p binding. These data provide the first evidence that both sequence-specific contacts and the structural integrity of domain IV of SRP RNA are important for assembly with SRP54p.

Identification of RNA sequences and structural elements required for assembly of fission yeast SRP54 protein with signal recognition particle RNA

Signal recognition particle (SRP) is a ribonucleoprotein composed of six polypeptides and a single RNA molecule. SRP RNA can be divided into four structural domains, the last of which is the most highly conserved and, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is the primary location to which deleterious mutations map. The ability of mammalian SRP54 protein (SRP54p) to bind Escherichia coli 4.5S RNA, a homolog of SRP RNA which contains only domain IV, suggested that SRP54p might interact directly with this region. To determine whether domain IV is critical for SRP54p binding in fission yeast cells, we used a native immunoprecipitation-RNA sequencing assay to test 13 mutant SRP RNAs for the ability to associate with the protein in vivo. The G156A mutation, which alters the 5' residue of the noncanonical first base pair of the domain IV terminal helix and confers a mild conditional growth defect, reduces assembly of the RNA with SRP54p. Mutating either of the two evolutionarily invariant residues in the bulged region 5' to G156 is more deleterious to growth and virtually abolishes SRP54p binding. We conclude that the conservation of nucleotides 154 to 156 is likely to be a consequence of their role as a sequence-specific recognition element for the SRP54 protein. We also tested a series of mutants with nucleotide substitutions in the conserved tetranucleotide loop and adjoining stem of domain IV. Although tetraloop mutations are deleterious to growth, they have little effect on SRP54p binding. Mutations which disrupt the base pair flanking the tetraloop result in conditional growth defects and significantly reduce association with SRP54p. Disruption of the other two base pairs in the short stem adjacent to the tetranucleotide loop has similar but less dramatic effects on SRP54p binding. These data provide the first evidence that both sequence-specific contacts and the structural integrity of domain IV of SRP RNA are important for assembly with SRP54p.

Protein secretion in Bacillus species

Bacilli secrete numerous proteins into the environment. Many of the secretory proteins, their export signals, and their processing steps during secretion have been characterized in detail. In contrast, the molecular mechanisms of protein secretion have been relatively poorly characterized. However, several components of the protein secretion machinery have been identified and cloned recently, which is likely to lead to rapid expansion of the knowledge of the protein secretion mechanism in Bacillus species. Comparison of the presently known export components of Bacillus species with those of Escherichia coli suggests that the mechanism of protein translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane is conserved among gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria differences are found in steps preceding and following the translocation process. Many of the secretory proteins of bacilli are produced industrially, but several problems have been encountered in the production of Bacillus heterologous secretory proteins. In the final section we discuss these problems and point out some possibilities to overcome them.

Transport of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

The biosynthesis of many eukaryotic proteins requires their transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. The process can be divided into two phases: (i) a targeting cycle, during which, by virtue of their signal sequences, nascent polypeptides are directed to translocation sites in the ER and (ii) the actual transfer of proteins across the membrane. The first phase has been well characterized, whereas the latter until recently was completely unresolved. Key components of the translocation apparatus have now been identified and it seems likely that they form a protein-conducting channel in the ER membrane. The transport process is similar to the process of protein export in bacteria.

Mechanistic insights relevant to protein secretion in yeast

During the past year, a powerful combination of genetic and biochemical approaches has yielded fascinating information with respect to the question of how proteins cross membranes and subsequently traffic between intracellular compartments of the yeast secretory pathway. Fundamental advances have been made in two specific areas. These include experiments that have provided new perspectives with respect to the nature of the soluble machinery involved in facilitating protein traffic from the cytoplasm to the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum, and work that has provided a biochemical description of what may in effect represent a membranous ligand-gated channel that is required for protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum lumen.

Signal recognition particle receptor is important for cell growth and protein secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

In mammalian cells, the signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor is required for the targeting of nascent secretory proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. We have identified the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of the alpha-subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha) and characterized its function in vivo. S. cerevisiae SR alpha is a 69-kDa peripheral membrane protein that is 32% identical (54% chemically similar) to its mammalian homologue and, like mammalian SR alpha, is predicted to contain a GTP binding domain. Yeast cells that contain the SR alpha gene (SRP101) under control of the GAL1 promoter show impaired translocation of soluble and membrane proteins across the ER membrane after depletion of SR alpha. The degree of the translocation defect varies for different proteins. The defects are similar to those observed in SRP deficient cells. Disruption of the SRP101 gene results in an approximately sixfold reduction in the growth rate of the cells. Disruption of the gene encoding SRP RNA (SCR1) or both SCR1 and SRP101 resulted in an indistinguishable growth phenotype, indicating that SRP receptor and SRP function in the same pathway. Taken together, these results suggest that the components and the mechanism of the SRP-dependent protein targeting pathway are evolutionarily conserved yet not essential for cell growth. Surprisingly, cells that are grown for a prolonged time in the absence of SRP or SRP receptor no longer show pronounced protein translocation defects. This adaptation is a physiological process and is not due to the accumulation of a suppressor mutation. The degree of this adaptation is strain dependent.

Protein targeting to and translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum

Several approaches are currently being taken to elucidate the mechanisms and the molecular components responsible for protein targeting to and translocation across the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Two experimental systems dominate the field: a biochemical system derived from mammalian exocrine pancreas, and a combined genetic and biochemical system employing the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Results obtained in each of these systems have contributed novel, mostly non-overlapping information. Recently, much effort in the field has been dedicated to identifying membrane proteins that comprise the translocon. Membrane proteins involved in translocation have been identified both in the mammalian system, using a combination of crosslinking and reconstitution approaches, and in S. cerevisiae, by selecting for mutants in the translocation pathway. None of the membrane proteins isolated, however, appears to be homologous between the two experimental systems. In the case of the signal recognition particle, the two systems have converged, which has led to a better understanding of how proteins are targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.

The S. cerevisiae SEC65 gene encodes a component of yeast signal recognition particle with homology to human SRP19

Translocation of proteins across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane represents the first step in the eukaryotic secretory pathway. In mammalian cells, the targeting of secretory and membrane protein precursors to the ER is mediated by signal recognition particle (SRP), a cytosolic ribonucleoprotein complex comprising a molecule of 7SL RNA and six polypeptide subunits (relative molecular masses 9, 14, 19, 54, 68 and 72K). In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a homologue of the 54K subunit (SRP54) co-purifies with a small cytoplasmic RNA, scR1 (refs 4, 5). Genetic data indicate that SRP54 and scR1 are involved in translocation in vivo, suggesting the existence of an SRP-like activity in yeast. Whether this activity requires additional components similar to those found in mammalian SRP is not known. We have recently reported a genetic selection that led to the isolation of a yeast mutant, sec65-1, which is conditionally defective in the insertion of integral membrane proteins into the ER. Here we report the cloning and sequencing of the SEC65 gene, which encodes a 31.2K protein with significant sequence similarity to the 19K subunit of human SRP (SRP19). We also report the cloning of a multicopy suppressor of sec65-1, and its identification as the previously defined SRP54 gene, providing genetic evidence for an interaction between these gene products in vivo.