Lack of correlation between thymidylate synthase levels in primary colorectal tumours and subsequent response to chemotherapy

Deciphering the potential value of 5-fluorouracil metabolic enzymes in predicting prognosis and treatment response of colorectal cancer patients

Introduction:

5-flourouracil (5-FU) is one of the standard chemotherapeutic drugs used today in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients. Disruption of 5-FU metabolic pathway may contribute to altered effectiveness towards 5-FU-based therapy. Hence, the study of 5-FU metabolizing enzymes might have the potential efficacy to predict survival and response to treatment in colorectal cancer patients.

Materials and methods:

Immunohistochemical localization of 5-FU metabolic enzymes (TS, MTHFR, DPYD, and TP) was evaluated in 143 untreated patients with colorectal cancer; their prognostic and predictive values were also evaluated.

Results:

Immuno-positivity for TS, MTHFR, DPYD, and TP was observed in 77%, 75%, 88%, and 96% of colorectal cancer patients, respectively. Univariate survival analysis in total patients showed that low DPYD expression significantly predicted adverse overall survival ( P=0.042). Moreover, subgroup of colon cancer patients with low TS expression was associated with unfavorable prognosis. TP expression also emerged as a prognosticator in the subgroup of early and advanced stage patients. Additionally, when effect of co-expression of 5-FU metabolic enzymes was evaluated in total patients, low coexpression of all four proteins was predictive of poor overall survival than for individuals expressing high coexpression of these proteins ( P=0.045). In contrast, none of the 5-FU metabolic enzymes—either singly or on coexpression—emerged as a useful biomarker of potential therapeutic value when evaluated in the subgroup of patients treated with 5-FU alone or 5-FU plus oxaliplatin.

Conclusion:

The above findings suggest that coexpression of 5-FU metabolic enzymes possess significant prognostic value and could be useful biomarkers in colorectal cancer patients.

Role of genomic factors beyond thymidylate synthase in the prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil

5-Fluorouracil (5FU) is still a major drug in combinations regimens for the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) both in the adjuvant and palliative setting. 5FU or its oral prodrug capecitabine is usually combined with irinotecan/oxaliplatin and the novel agents bevacizumab/cetuximab. Although this improved the outcome, the overall prognosis in patients with metastasized disease is still relatively poor. Although the target for 5FU, thymidylate synthase was shown to have a predictive value, this could only predict response in a subset of patients. Given the heterogeneous and complex nature of CRC, it is likely that other aberrations can affect therapeutic response. As an alternative, we investigated Copy number alterations using oligonucleotide-based high-throughput array-comparative-genomic-hybridization (aCGH) to obtain an unbiased screening of the whole genetic spectrum. Chromosomal aberrations have been identified in 85% of CRC patients and include genomic regions harboring copy number alterations in the DNA. These alterations may change the expression of many genes and might explain the differential response to therapy as shown in recent studies with several 5FU combinations. In order to clarify new predictive parameters for 5FU, we used aCGH in a historical cohort of patients, which received treatment with single agent 5FU, and an unsupervised clustering analysis showed a statistical (p < 0.05) difference between responding and nonresponding patients. We also find that several regions showed differences between responders/non-responders, such as losses in 12p12.3-12q15 and in 18p (where TS is located) in responding patients. Genome-wide analysis may provide an additional tool to discriminate between responders and nonresponders.

A prognostic analysis of 895 cases of stage III colon cancer in different colon subsites

PURPOSE

Stage III colon cancer is currently treated as an entity with a unified therapeutic principle. The aim of the retrospective study is to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of site-specific stage III colon cancers and the influences of tumor location on prognosis.

METHODS

Eight hundred ninety-five patients with stage III colon cancer treated with radical operation and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin) were divided into seven groups according to colon segment (cecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure, transverse colon, splenic flexure, descending colon, and sigmoid colon). Expression of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 (ERCC1) and thymidylate synthase (TS) was examined by immunohistochemistry. We assessed if differences exist in patient characteristics and clinic outcomes between the seven groups.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in tumor differentiation (P < 0.001), T stage (P < 0.001), N stage (P < 0.001), American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage (P < 0.001), metachronous liver metastasis (P < 0.001), metachronous lung metastasis (P < 0.001), and ERCCI expression (P < 0.001) between the seven groups. Both 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS) exhibited significant differences (both P < 0.001) with survival gradually decreasing from cecum to sigmoid colon. Cox regression analyses identified that tumor location was an independent prognostic factor for RFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Stage III colon cancer located proximally carried a poorer survival than that located distally. Different efficacies of FOLFOX adjuvant chemotherapy may be an important factor affecting survival of site-specific stage III colon cancers.

Prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer patients

The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinicopathologic/prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase (TS), orotate phosphoribosyltransferase (OPRT), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) proteins in postoperative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Microarray slides from a set of 178 NSCLC patients were used for the detection of TS, OPRT, and TP expression by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between clinicopathologic factors and protein expression of three proteins was analyzed. Ninety seven carcinomas (57.4%) were TS-positive, 90 carcinomas (53.9%) were OPRT-positive, and 102 carcinomas (69.4%) were TP-positive. Compared with the TS-positive patients, the overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in the TS-negative patients (hazard ratio [HR] =1.766, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1.212–2.573, P=0.003). Significant differences between TS-positive and TS-negative patients was also observed in the following stratified analyses: 1) adenocarcinoma subgroup (HR =2.079, 95% CI =1.235–3.500, P=0.006); 2) less than 60-year-old subgroup (HR =1.890, 95% CI =1.061–3.366, P=0.031); 3) stage II/III subgroup (HR =1.594, 95% CI =1.036–2.453, P=0.034); and 4) surgery plus adjuvant therapy subgroup (HR =1.976, 95% CI =1.226–3.185, P=0.005). However, the OS was not significantly correlated with OPRT or TP protein expression. This study demonstrates that the TS level in tumor tissues may be a useful marker to predict the postoperative OS in NSCLC patients.

Management of colorectal cancer patients after resection of liver metastases: can we offer a tailored treatment?

Surgical resection remains the only option of cure for patients with colorectal liver metastases, and no patient should be precluded from surgery. There is much controversy not only regarding the most appropriate therapeutic approach in the neoadjuvant setting but also after surgery is performed. Many patients will experience early relapses but others will be long survivors. We need to establish reliable prognostic and predictive factors to offer a tailored treatment. Several prognostic factors after metastasectomy have been identified: high C-reactive protein levels, a high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, elevated neutrophil count and low serum albumin are related to a worst outcome. Elevated CEA and Ki 67 levels, intrahepatic and perihepatic lymph node invasion are also some of the markers related to a worst outcome. In contrast, the administration of preoperative chemotherapy has been associated with a better prognosis after hepatectomy. The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy should be done taking in consideration these factors. Regarding predictive factors, determination of ERCC1, TS, TP and DPD and UGT1 polymorphisms assessment could be considered prior to chemotherapy administration. This would avoid treatment related toxicities and increase this population quality of life.

Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase mRNA expression and the response of cholangiocarcinoma to 5-fluorouracil

AIM: To determine whether expression of certain enzymes related to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism predicts 5-FU chemosensitivity in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

METHODS: The histoculture drug response assay (HDRA) was performed using surgically resected CCA tissues. Tumor cell viability was determined morphologically with hematoxylin and eosin- and terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling-stained tissues. The mRNA expression of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT), thymidylate synthase (TS), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) was determined with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. The levels of gene expression and the sensitivity to 5-FU were evaluated.

RESULTS: Twenty-three CCA tissues were obtained from patients who had been diagnosed with intrahepatic CCA and who underwent surgical resection at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University from 2007 to 2009. HDRA was used to determine the response of these CCA tissues to 5-FU. Based on the dose-response curve, 200 μg/mL 5-FU was selected as the test concentration. The percentage of inhibition index at the median point was selected as the cut-off point to differentiate the responding and non-responding tumors to 5-FU. When the relationship between TP, OPRT, TS and DPD mRNA expression levels and the sensitivity of CCA tissues to 5-FU was examined, only OPRT mRNA expression was significantly correlated with the response to 5-FU. The mean expression level of OPRT was significantly higher in the responder group compared to the non-responder group (0.41 ± 0.25 vs 0.22 ± 0.12, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: OPRT mRNA expression may be a useful predictor of 5-FU chemosensitivity of CCA. Whether OPRT mRNA could be used to predict the success of 5-FU chemotherapy in CCA patients requires confirmation in patients.

Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer mortality worldwide. In the last decade, median overall survival has increased significantly with the introduction of new cytotoxics and biologic therapies. Notably, the definition of molecular markers predicting benefit with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted agents has led to important advances in the personalized treatment of CRC. Data derived from multiple phase III trials have indicated that KRAS mutations can be considered a highly specific negative biomarker of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. The predictive value of additional mutations and deregulations of the signaling pathways downstream of the EGFR such as BRAF, NRAS, PIK3CA, or PTEN is under intensive investigation. In addition, status of microsatellite instability and molecular markers related to the metabolism of chemotherapy agents has shown promising ability to select patients with higher chances of response to cytotoxic agents. Although attempts to identify predictive factors for efficacy to antiangiogenic therapies have been disappointing, further research on this field will maximize their therapeutic index. Determination of molecular predictive factors before selection of chemotherapy is rapidly approaching us to the paradigm of individualized treatment of CRC.

Development of molecular biomarkers in individualized treatment of colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality despite recent expansion of treatment options in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our knowledge about key signaling pathways in colorectal tumors has contributed to the identification of specific molecular markers of response to targeted agents. In this review we discuss well-established and potential predictive biomarkers of benefit with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. Data derived from multiple phase III trials have indicated that KRAS mutations can be considered a highly specific negative biomarker of response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Other molecular aberrations in pathways downstream of EGFR such as BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA mutations, and PTEN loss are also reviewed. Moreover biomarkers of efficacy to classic chemotherapeutic agents as well as recent advances regarding high-throughput technologies and circulating tumor cells are also considered. Personalized cancer medicine in the mCRC scenario seems to be near reality, but validation of many biomarkers in prospective clinical trials is urgently warranted.

Pretreatment transcriptional profiling for predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Patients presenting with locally advanced rectal cancer currently receive preoperative radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. Although pathologic complete response is achieved for approximately 10% to 30% of patients, a proportion of patients derive no benefit from this therapy while being exposed to toxic side effects of treatment. Therefore, there is a strong need to identify patients who are unlikely to benefit from neoadjuvant therapy to help direct them toward alternate and ultimately more successful treatment options.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this study, we obtained expression profiles from pretreatment biopsies for 51 rectal cancer patients. All patients underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy, followed by resection of the tumor 6 to 8 weeks posttreatment. Gene expression and response to treatment were correlated, and a supervised learning algorithm was used to generate an original predictive classifier and validate previously published classifiers.

RESULTS

Novel predictive classifiers based on Mandard's tumor regression grade, metabolic response, TNM (tumor node metastasis) downstaging, and normal tissue expression profiles were generated. Because there were only 7 patients who had minimal treatment response (>80% residual tumor), expression profiles were used to predict good tumor response and outcome. These classifiers peaked at 82% sensitivity and 89% specificity; however, classifiers with the highest sensitivity had poor specificity, and vice versa. Validation of predictive classifiers from previously published reports was attempted using this cohort; however, sensitivity and specificity ranged from 21% to 70%.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that the clinical utility of microarrays in predictive medicine is not yet within reach for rectal cancer and alternatives to microarrays should be considered for predictive studies in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Correlation between thymidylate synthase gene variants, RNA and protein levels in primary colorectal adenocarcinomas

This study was designed to compare thymidylate synthase (TS) genotype, mRNA and protein levels in primary colorectal adenocarcinoma, and to examine the correlation between microsatellite instability (MSI) and TS expression. The TS genotype of 68 patients with colorectal cancer was determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumour tissue. The TS mRNA levels in tumour tissue were measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and TS protein levels and MSI status were assessed using immunohistochemistry. Significantly higher mRNA and protein levels were observed in patients with the TS 3R/3R versus the 2R/2R and 2R/3R genotypes. There was no correlation between TS single nucleotide polymorphism and TS expression. Individuals homozygous for the six base-pair insertion in the 3'-untranslated region had significantly higher TS mRNA levels than heterozygous and homozygous wild type individuals. The TS mRNA and protein levels were significantly higher in microsatellite unstable tumours compared with microsatellite stable tumours. There was a significant association between the number of TS enhancer region repeats (in blood) and intratumoural TS mRNA and protein levels. A larger case series investigating the role of TS gene polymorphisms as predictors of sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy is required.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression in metastatic sites is predictive for response in patients with colorectal cancer treated with continuous oral capecitabine and biweekly oxaliplatin

The primary objective of this study was to determine the activity and safety profile of biweekly oxaliplatin combined with continuous oral capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. A secondary endpoint was to investigate the correlation between thymidylate synthase and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) expression in metastatic tissues and tumor response. Forty-one patients received oral capecitabine 1331 mg/m every day combined with intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m every 2 weeks. The overall response rate was 58.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.3-73.6%], the median progression-free survival 9.4 months (95% CI: 7.7-11.2 months) and the median survival 22.3 months (95% CI: 16.1-27.5 months). There were no grade 4 toxicities, and grade 3 toxicity was also uncommon. High TP expression in metastatic tissue was significantly associated with response to treatment (P=0.019), and also with a trend towards a better median progression-free survival and overall survival compared with patients expressing low TP (P=0.056; P=0.073). This study suggests that biweekly oxaliplatin and continuous oral capecitabine is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Moreover, these findings add to a growing body of evidence that patients with high levels of intratumoral TP expression are the ideal candidates for capecitabine-based chemotherapy.

Gene expression and effects of orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine on gastric and colorectal cancer

The effects of chemotherapy on gastrointestinal cancer are influenced by the chemotherapeutic sensitivity of the cancer cells. Determining the expression of genes related to chemotherapeutic sensitivity has been used as a molecular method. The aim of the study was to clarify the relationships between the expression of genes related to chemotherapeutic sensitivity and the effects of orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine on gastric and colorectal cancer. Forty-five patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy containing orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine after undergoing curative surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer were enrolled. Twenty-four patients had colorectal cancer and 21 patients had gastric cancer. Total RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of the resected tumors, and the expression of 11 genes was measured using the RT-PCR method. We then analyzed the relationships between the gene expression and the postoperative relapse rate as well as the relationships between clinicopathological factors and postoperative relapse rate. The median observation period of the subjects was 41 months. Twelve out of the 21 gastric cancer patients (57%) and 11 out of the 24 colorectal cancer patients (46%) relapsed. Although the results of a univariate analysis revealed that expression of none of the evaluated genes was related to relapse in the gastric cancer patients, excision repair cross-complementing gene 1 (ERCC1) overexpression was related to the relapse rate in colorectal cancer patients (p=0.023). When 1.295 was set as the cut-off value for ERCC1 overexpression using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 67% of patients with ERCC1 overexpression and 25% of patients without ERCC1 overexpression relapsed. The relapse-free survival rate was lower in the group with ERCC1 overexpression than in the group without ERCC1 overexpression (p=0.046). ERCC1 overexpression appears to be a useful predictor of relapse in colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant therapy with regimens including orally active derivatives of fluoropyrimidine.

Analysis of the thymidylate synthase gene structure in colorectal cancer patients and its possible relation with the 5-Fluorouracil drug response

Thymidylate synthase (TS) catalyzes methylation of dUMP to dTMP and it is the target for the 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) activity. Barbour et al. showed that variant structural forms of TS in tumour cell lines confer resistance to fluoropyrimidines. We planned to perform the whole TS gene structure by means of sequencing techniques in human colorectal cancer (CRC) samples to try to identify the presence of any possible TS variant form that could be responsible of fluoropyrimidines drug resistance and of the worse prognosis. We performed the TS-DNA gene sequence in 68 CRC from patients of A, B, and C Dukes' stages and different histological grade, but we did not find any mutation in the TS-DNA structure. In the future we intend to widen the TS structure analysis to the metastatic CRCs, because due to their higher genomic instability, they could present a TS variant form responsible of the fluoropyrimidines drug resistance and the worse prognosis.

Prognostic value of ERCC1, thymidylate synthase, and glutathione S-transferase pi for 5-FU/oxaliplatin chemotherapy in advanced colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether the expression of the excision repair cross-complementing 1 (ERCC1), thymidylate synthase (TS) and glutathione S-transferase pi (GSTpi) predict clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with fluorouracil (5-FU)/oxaliplatin chemotherapy.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 70 patients with advanced colorectal cancer (median age, 54 years). Patients were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m as a 2-hour infusion on days 1 plus leucovorin (LV) 20 mg/m over 10 minutes, followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m and a 22-hour continuous infusion of 600 mg/m from day 1 to 2. Treatment was repeated at 2-week intervals. The expression of ERCC1, TS, and GSTpi in primary tumors was examined using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

ERCC1, TS, and GSTpi were positive in 55.7%, 68.6%, and 71.4% of cases, respectively. Patients without TS expression were more likely to respond to chemotherapy (P = 0.009). There were no significant differences between response to treatment and the ERCC1 or GSTpi expression pattern (P = 0.768, P = 0.589, respectively). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients without ERCC1 expression (P = 0.0474). Patients who were ERCC1 positive combined with TS positive, or those with ERCC1 positive combined with TS positive and GSTpi positive had a poor OS (P = 0.0017, P = 0.0323, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that both ERCC1 and TS expression significantly impacted OS (hazard ratio 1.72, P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Immunohistochemical study of ERCC1 and TS may be useful for the prediction of clinical outcome in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

Correlation Between Thymidylate Synthase Protein Expression and Gene Polymorphism with Clinicopathological Parameters in Colorectal Carcinoma

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) represents the basis of chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma, inhibiting thymidylate synthase (TS), an essential enzyme for DNA replication. Previous studies have associated high TS protein expression by tumor cells with poor outcome of patients with colorectal carcinoma, but others have refuted these findings. In view of the potential role of TS as predictive parameter and the lack of consensus in the literature, the present study compared 2 methods: protein expression and gene polymorphism, correlating them with clinicopathological findings. Immunohistochemical detection of TS in tumor cells and detection of gene polymorphism in the blood were performed in 32 patients with colorectal carcinoma treated with 5-FU. No correlation was found between TS protein expression and gene polymorphism. Neither method correlated with survival, tumor staging, and tumor histological grading. This result possibly reflects a complex tumor response to 5-FU therapy, where TS is just one of the involved proteins.

The prognostic significance of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal cancer of 303 patients adjuvantly treated with 5-fluorouracil

Cytotoxic effect of 5-fluorouracil 5-FU is mediated through inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS), and 5-FU is catabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Efficacy of 5-FU may therefore depend on the TS and DPD activity of colorectal cancer. Archival tumour specimens from 303 consecutive patients were analysed for the expression of TS and DPD using immunohistochemistry. All patients were completely resected for colorectal cancer stages II-III and have subsequently received adjuvant treatment with 5-FU. In a multivariate analysis adjusting for the impact of bowel obstruction and vascular tumour invasion, diffuse TS pattern was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-3.2; p = 0.02), but without significant association to death (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 0.9-2.8; p = 0.08). High TS intensity was not significantly associated with lower risk of recurrence (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.1; p = 0.07) or death (HR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.3-1.2; p = 0.2). High DPD intensity was significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence (HR = 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1-2.3; p = 0.03) and death (HR = 1.6; 95% CI: 1.1-2.5; p = 0.02). Patients with a combination of low TS and high DPD intensity were at significantly increased risk of both recurrence (HR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0-4.2; p = 0.04) and death (HR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.0-4.0; p = 0.05). No relationship between tolerability and toxicity of 5-FU and TS and DPD expression was found. It is concluded that characterizing colorectal carcinomas by TS and DPD expression may disclose subsets of patients with significantly greater risk of disease recurrence and early death. This may be utilized in the selection of patients for treatment approaches and for decision on follow-up programs.

Molecular markers that predict response to colon cancer therapy

Progress in the treatment of colon cancer depends on the development of target-based molecules built on an improved understanding of the molecular biology of the disease. Defining end points for chemotherapy resistance is needed as drug resistance develops quickly and patients demonstrate variation in response to chemotherapy. Many techniques that measure a marker's preponderance have been developed including biochemical, immunohistochemical, genomics, proteomics or a combination thereof. However, standardization of these techniques that measure either genes or their protein products is urgently needed. This article reviews several markers (TS,TP, DPD, FT, EGFR, VEGF, CD44v6, TRAIL, microsatellite instability, allelic deletions, oncogenes and suppressor genes [c-myc, Ki-Ras, p53, p21, Topo I, Topo IIalpha, Fos, hMLH1, Bcl-2/Bax and MDR1], MDR-related proteins [Pgp, MRP and LRP], genomic polymorphisms [XPD, ERCC1, GSTP1 and TS 3 -UTR] and COX-;2) that influence DNA metabolism, DNA damage, programmed cell death, the immune or vascular system, or lead to mutations. When combined together and tested by newly developed genomic and proteomic approaches, many of these markers provide a more sensitive indicative predictor of response than when evaluated separately or by older biochemical, immunohistologic or morphologic methods. A global approach involving the simultaneous testing of several predictive multimarkers will provide critical information for improving chemotherapy to alleviate suffering from this disease.

A prospective, blinded analysis of thymidylate synthase and p53 expression as prognostic markers in the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite previous studies, uncertainty has persisted about the role of thymidylate synthase (TS) and p53 status as markers of prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 967 patients accrued to a large adjuvant trial in CRC were included in a prospectively planned molecular substudy, and of them, 59% had rectal cancer and about 90% received adjuvant chemotherapy (either systemically or randomly allocated to intraportal 5-fluorouracil infusion or both). TS and p53 status were determined, blinded to any clinical data, by immunohistochemistry using a validated polyclonal antibody or the DO-7 clone, respectively, and their relationships with overall survival were examined.

RESULTS

High TS expression was observed in 58% and overexpression of p53 in 60% of tumours. TS expression correlated with tumour stage, and p53 overexpression, with rectal cancers. There was no evidence that either marker was significantly associated with survival by either univariate (TS hazard ratio (HR) = 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.18 and P = 0.6 and p53 HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.78-1.23 and P = 0.9) or multivariate analyses (TS HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.25 and P = 0.9 and p53 HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.78-1.23 and P = 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Neither TS nor p53 expression has significant prognostic value in the adjuvant setting of CRC.

Thymidylate synthase expression in colon carcinomas with microsatellite instability

PURPOSE

Colon cancer cells with high-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) display resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) that can be reversed by restoring DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proficiency. Given that thymidylate synthase (TS) is inhibited by 5-FU, we studied the relationship between MSI and TS expression, and the prognostic effect of these and other markers (i.e., p53 and 17p allelic imbalance).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Dukes' stage B2 and C colon carcinomas (n = 320) from participants in 5-FU-based adjuvant therapy trials were analyzed for MSI and 17p allelic imbalance. Expression of MMR (hMLH1, hMSH2), TS, and p53 proteins were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Correlations between markers and associations with overall survival were determined.

RESULTS

Of 320 cancers studied, 60 (19%) were MSI-H. TS expression variables were similar in MSI-H and microsatellite stable/low-frequency MSI (MSS/MSI-L) cancers, and unrelated to MMR proteins. MSI-H tumors had lower stage (P = 0.0007), fewer metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.004), and improved overall survival (P = 0.01). Loss of MMR proteins was also associated with better overall survival (P = 0.006). None of the TS variables were prognostic. Histologic grade (P = 0.0008) and nodal status (P = 0.0002) were associated with overall survival, in contrast to 17p allelic imbalance or p53. Only MSI status or loss of MMR proteins, histologic grade, and tumor stage were independent markers for overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

MSI-H tumors show earlier stage at presentation and better stage-adjusted survival rates. MSI status and TS expression were unrelated and TS was not prognostic, suggesting that TS levels cannot explain therapeutic resistance to 5-FU reported in MSI-H colon cancers.

Drug resistance, predictive markers and pharmacogenomics in colorectal cancer

Resistance to chemotherapy limits the effectiveness of current cancer therapies, including those used to treat colorectal cancer, which is the second most common cause of cancer death in Europe and the United States. 5-Fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens are the standard treatment for colorectal cancer in both the adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Drug resistance is thought to cause treatment failure in over 90% of patients with metastatic cancer, while drug resistant micrometastic tumour cells may also reduce the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. The identification of panels of biomarkers that not only identify those patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy treatment, but also which chemotherapies to use, would be a major advance. In this review, we describe molecular mechanisms of drug resistance that may be relevant to colorectal cancer. We also describe the results of predictive biomarker studies in this disease. Finally, we discuss how pharmacogenomics and other high through-put technologies may impact on the clinical management of colorectal cancer in the future.

Thymidine phosphorylase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase mRNA expression in primary colorectal tumors-correlation to tumor histopathology and clinical follow-up

AIM

Evaluation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidylate synthase (TS) mRNA levels in formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded tissues of patients with colorectal cancer and their prognostic and/or predictive value.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total RNA was isolated from microdissected, formalin-fixed, and paraffin-embedded tissues (controls and tumor) and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) in the LightCycler system. Resulting mRNA levels correlated to tumor histology (n=102) and the clinical follow-up in patients treated by resection alone (n=40) and by resection plus adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy (n=52).

RESULTS

Correlation to histopathological parameters revealed a significant association between tumor stage and the TP mRNA level (T and N category and UICC) as well as the TP:DPD (T and N category and UICC) and TS:DPD (T category) ratio. In addition, tumor differentiation was correlated to the TS mRNA level and the TS:DPD ratio. Finally, the TS:DPD ratio was a prognostic marker for overall survival in patients receiving resection alone (p=0.032). Moreover, a high TP:DPD ratio (>8.1; p=0.002) and, marginally, low DPD (<8.2; p=0.05) mRNA levels significantly correlated to disease-free survival.

CONCLUSION

We present a novel, standardized approach for TP, DPD, and TS mRNA quantification in archival tissue specimens and applied this to a large series of primary colorectal tumors. Correlations to histopathological parameters and clinical follow-up revealed an association of TP, DPD and TS mRNA expression patterns with tumor stage and suggested new prognostic and predictive markers for patients with colorectal cancer.

Comparison of the novel quantitative ARMS assay and an enriched PCR-ASO assay for K-ras mutations with conventional cytology on endobiliary brush cytology from 312 consecutive extrahepatic biliary stenoses

BACKGROUND

Extrahepatic biliary stenosis (EBS) has malignant and benign causes. Patients with EBS are at risk of having or developing malignancy. Accurate diagnostic tests for early detection and surveillance are needed. The sensitivity of biliary cytology for malignancy is low. K-ras mutation analysis on brush cytology is a valuable adjunct, but specificity is low. A quantitative test for K-ras mutations has been developed: the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS).

AIM

To assess the test characteristics and additional value of ARMS in diagnosing the cause of EBS.

METHODS

Brush samples from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were collected from 312 patients with EBS. K-ras mutation analysis was performed using ARMS-allele specific amplification was coupled with real time fluorescent detection of PCR products. Results were compared with conventional cytology and K-ras mutation analysis using allele specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridisation, and evaluated in view of the final diagnosis.

RESULTS

The test characteristics of ARMS and ASO largely agreed. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 49% and 42%, specificity 93% and 88%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 96% and 91%, respectively. The sensitivity of ARMS and cytology combined was 71%, and PPV was 93%. The specificity of ARMS could be increased to 100% by setting limits for the false positives, but reduced sensitivity from 49% to 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

ARMS can be considered supplementary to conventional cytology, and comparable to ASO in diagnosing malignant EBS. A specificity of 100% can be achieved with ARMS, which should be considered in the surveillance of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer.

Phase II study of tailored chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer with either 5-fluouracil and leucovorin or oxaliplatin and irinotecan based on the expression of thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

BACKGROUND

Thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) are essential enzymes for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism. In patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC), retrospective studies have shown that low expression levels of TS and DPD correlated with response to 5-FU. We performed a prospective study in which the choice of first-line chemotherapy with either 5-FU or a non-5-FU containing regimen was based on TS and DPD expression.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fresh-frozen samples of metastases were obtained from 58 previously untreated patients with ACRC. mRNA expression of TS and DPD was quantified using an RT-PCR assay. Patients with low tumor expression of both TS and DPD received weekly bolus 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) 500 mg/m2 (group A); patients with high TS and/or DPD received 3-weekly oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 and irinotecan 200 mg/m2 (group B). After progression, cross-over to the alternative regimen was attempted.

RESULTS

Of 53 eligible patients, 31 had tumors with both low TS and low DPD, and were treated in group A. A response was observed in 11 patients [35%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 19% to 54%]. Cross-over to second-line oxaliplatin/irinotecan resulted in a partial response in two out of 16 patients (13%; 95% CI 1% to 38%). In group B, four out of 22 patients responded (18%; 95% CI 5% to 40%), while no responses were observed in 12 patients after cross-over to 5-FU/LV (0%; 95% CI 0% to 28%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prospective selection of 5-FU/LV chemotherapy based on low TS and DPD expression in patients with ACRC did not confirm the high response rates reported in retrospective studies. The procedure of obtaining metastatic tissue and quantitation of enzymes appeared feasible but cumbersome. Before assessing the clinical utility of a predictive marker in a randomized trial, future studies should focus on prospective validation of the assay in a large and well defined population.

Genetic factors influencing pyrimidine-antagonist chemotherapy

Pyrimidine antagonists, for example, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cytarabine (ara-C) and gemcitabine (dFdC), are widely used in chemotherapy regimes for colorectal, breast, head and neck, non-small-cell lung cancer, pancreatic cancer and leukaemias. Extensive metabolism is a prerequisite for conversion of these pyrimidine prodrugs into active compounds. Interindividual variation in the activity of metabolising enzymes can affect the extent of prodrug activation and, as a result, act on the efficacy of chemotherapy treatment. Genetic factors at least partly explain interindividual variation in antitumour efficacy and toxicity of pyrimidine antagonists. In this review, proteins relevant for the efficacy and toxicity of pyrimidine antagonists will be summarised. In addition, the role of germline polymorphisms, tumour-specific somatic mutations and protein expression levels in the metabolic pathways and clinical pharmacology of these drugs are described. Germline polymorphisms of uridine monophosphate kinase (UMPK), orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT), thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and gene expression levels of OPRT, UMPK, TS, DPD, uridine phosphorylase, uridine kinase, thymidine phosphorylase, thymidine kinase, deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotide hydrolase are discussed in relation to 5-FU efficacy. Cytidine deaminase (CDD) and 5'-nucleotidase (5NT) gene polymorphisms and CDD, 5NT, deoxycytidine kinase and MRP5 gene expression levels and their potential relation to dFdC and ara-C cytotoxicity are reviewed.

Prospective clinical trials using a pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic approach

The antitumor activity of most anticancer agents is limited by a number of different factors, such as their cellular targets and activating enzymes, while constitutive genetic polymorphisms may limit drug bioavailability and influence either antitumor efficacy or toxic side effects. An example of a drug for which clear predictive parameters have been identified is 5-fluorouracil (5FU): its antitumor activity is limited by either a high activity of the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) and/or a high activity of its degrading enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Retrospective studies showed a clear correlation between a high expression of TS and a poor response, which was stronger when DPD was included in the evaluation (high DPD, poor response). Therefore we initiated a clinical prospective study in which we treated previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer with tailored chemotherapy: at a low TS-mRNA and low DPD-mRNA patients were stratified to receive a standard weekly 5FU-leucovorin regimen. At a high TS and/or DPD, patients were stratified to receive a combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Up to now this proof-of-principle study demonstrated that selection of patients is possible and can clearly improve the clinical outcome. The next step is to develop algorithms to select patients for combination chemotherapy with 5FU-leucovorin and new compounds, such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan, or novel targeted agents such as bevacizumab or cetuximab. For these combination schedules the optimal combination of predictive factors has to be explored.

Predictive factors for response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients

Colorectal cancer represents a major health problem in the western world. A lot of drugs have been employed in treatment of this disease, but only few data are available about predictive factors for response to anticancer treatments in colorectal cancer. Aim of this paper is to review the main data about this investigation field. Using a Medline database search (1966-2003) we reviewed all the relevant papers that investigate clinical and molecular predictors for response to the main drugs used in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients, both in adjuvant and in advanced setting. Moreover we comprehensively reviewed all the data published in abstract form during the most significant international meetings. Our review put in evidence the most important predictive factors for response in colorectal cancer patients treated with anticancer chemotherapy both in adjuvant and in advanced setting. The predictive factors are clustered on the basis of the different anticancer drugs. The results of this review provide the rationale basis for personalizing anticancer treatment in colorectal cancer patients by molecular and clinical features, aiming to improve response rate and reduce toxicities.

Thymidylate synthase gene polymorphism predicts toxicity in colorectal cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

PURPOSE

The target enzyme for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is thymidylate synthase (TS). The TYMS gene encoding this enzyme is polymorphic, having either double (2R) or tri-tandem (3R) repeats of a 28-bp sequence in the promoter region and a 6-bp variation in the 3'-untranslated region (3'-UTR). TS expression predicts response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy, and the expression seems to be determined by the TYMS gene promoter. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of determining these two TYMS gene polymorphisms to predict the toxicity and efficacy of 5-FU treatment in patients with colorectal cancer.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The determination of TYMS genotypes was performed in tumor and normal tissues by PCR amplification from 90 patients with colorectal cancer who were treated with adjuvant or palliative 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Associations between polymorphisms in the TYMS promoter and in the 3'-UTR gene and clinical outcome of these 90 patients treated with 5-FU based chemotherapy were evaluated individually. The linkage between TYMS promoter and TYMS 3'-UTR region polymorphisms was evaluated and a haplotype analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Individuals who were homozygous for the double repeat in the TYMS promoter region had more severe side effects to 5-FU. Patients with a 2R/2R, a 2R/3R, or a 3R/3R genotype had a grade 3 or 4 toxicity rate of 43, 18, and 3% respectively (P < 0.01). The TYMS promoter and TYMS 3'-UTR polymorphisms were in linkage disequilibrium, and the haplotype 2R/ins 6-bp was significantly associated with a high risk of severe side effects to 5-FU. The TYMS promoter and TYMS 3'-UTR polymorphisms were not associated with a response to 5-FU and survival of patients who received palliative 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that TYMS genotyping could be of help in predicting toxicity to 5-FU-based chemotherapy. TYMS genotyping might make it possible to individualize treatment for patients with colorectal cancer.

Pharmacogenetic influences on treatment response and toxicity in colorectal cancer

Current use of chemotherapeutic and targeted agents for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) results in high tumor response rates and relatively long overall patient survival. Fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin are highly active in first-line and salvage therapy of colorectal cancer. Targeted therapies, including anti-angiogenesis agents and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibodies, have been incorporated with traditional chemotherapy and offer additional options for patients with CRC. However, there is marked variability in response to therapy, as well as frequency and severity of toxicities. Molecular markers and pharmacogenomic profiling may improve prediction of patients who will experience significant benefit or toxicity from currently available agents. Validation of these predictive factors in prospective clinical trials is now necessary to allow for a rational and systematic individualization of cancer therapy.

Intratumoral molecular or genetic markers as predictors of clinical outcome with chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Identification of molecular markers at either the intragenic, chromosomal, mRNA, or protein level that might predict whether colorectal cancer patients are likely to benefit from adjuvant or palliative therapy is a high priority. The majority of clinical studies addressing this issue, particularly those done in the adjuvant setting, analyzed tumor samples from patients treated in the era when 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or combined with leucovorin or levamisole were the mainstay of therapy. This review highlights some of the intratumoral molecular markers that may have importance as predictors of benefit with 5-FU-based therapy. Although the goal of these investigations is to one day permit selection of therapy for an individual patient based on the tumor phenotype, prospective studies have yet to be conducted that test whether selection of therapy based on molecular markers results in an improved outcome.

Customizing chemotherapy for colon cancer: the potential of gene expression profiling

The value of gene expression profiling, or microarray analysis, for the classification and prognosis of multiple forms of cancer is now clearly established. For colon cancer, expression profiling can readily discriminate between normal and tumor tissue, and to some extent between tumors of different histopathological stage and prognosis. While a definitive in vivo study demonstrating the potential of this methodology for predicting response to chemotherapy is presently lacking, the ability of microarrays to distinguish other subtleties of colon cancer phenotype, as well as recent in vitro proof-of-principle experiments utilizing colon cancer cell lines, illustrate the potential of this methodology for predicting the probability of response to specific chemotherapeutic agents. This review discusses some of the recent advances in the use of microarray analysis for understanding and distinguishing colon cancer subtypes, and attempts to identify challenges that need to be overcome in order to achieve the goal of using gene expression profiling for customizing chemotherapy in colon cancer.

Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal cancers receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: a review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Many studies have been published that report an association between thymidylate synthase (TS) and response to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy and the overall outcome of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The results have given rise to the possibility that, by determination of TS levels, the physician may decide if the patient has a potential benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based treatment, similar to measurements of oestrogen receptors in breast cancer. The purpose of this review is to summarize critically the reports on TS measurement in gastrointestinal cancer, focusing on the adjuvant fluoropyrimidine treatment situation.

METHODS

We reviewed more than 20 studies that reported the association of TS with the clinical outcome in patients with gastrointestinal cancer who had undergone complete resection of the primary tumour only or were receiving additional adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Patients with metastasized disease who expressed high TS levels display a low probability of responding to fluoropyrimidine-based treatment and have a poorer survival rate. Patients with high TS levels who undergo complete surgical resection of the primary tumour also have a poorer prognosis than those with tumours with low TS expression. In contrast to advanced disease and to surgery alone, patients with high TS levels appear to benefit, especially, from adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy after complete primary tumour resection, while patients with low TS levels do not.

CONCLUSION

Patients with gastrointestinal cancers that express high TS levels have a poor prognosis with regard to fluoropyrimidine-based palliative chemotherapy or complete primary tumour resection. In contrast, patients with high TS levels might benefit from adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based treatment after primary tumour resection. However, additional prospective studies are mandatory to define the precise role of TS in adjuvant therapy.

Thymidylate synthase expression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

A number of studies have investigated the relationship between thymidylate synthase (TS) expression and survival in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although most have reported poorer overall and progression-free survival with high TS expression, estimates of the hazard ratio (HR) between studies differ wildly. To derive a more precise estimate of the prognostic significance of TS expression, we have reviewed published studies and carried out a meta-analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty studies stratifying overall survival and/or progression-free survival in CRC patients by TS expression status were eligible for analysis. The principal outcome measure was the HR. Data from these studies were pooled using standard meta-analysis techniques.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies investigated outcome in a total of 887 cases with advanced CRC, and seven studies investigated outcome in a total of 2,610 patients with localized CRC. A number of methods were used both to assess TS expression and to assign TS status. Sample sizes varied greatly, small sample sizes being a feature of the advanced disease studies. The combined HR estimate for overall survival (OS) was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.34 to 2.26) and 1.35 (95% CI, 1.07 to 1.80) in the advanced and adjuvant settings, respectively, but there was evidence of heterogeneity and possible publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Tumors expressing high levels of TS appeared to have a poorer OS compared with tumors expressing low levels. Additional studies with consistent methodology are needed to define the precise prognostic value of TS.

Digital karyotyping identifies thymidylate synthase amplification as a mechanism of resistance to 5-fluorouracil in metastatic colorectal cancer patients

Resistance to chemotherapy is a major cause of mortality in advanced cancer patients. In this study, digital karyotyping was used to search for genomic alterations in liver metastases that were clinically resistant to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In two of four patients, we identified amplification of an approximately 100-kb region on 18p11.32 that was of particular interest because it contained the gene encoding thymidylate synthase (TYMS), a molecular target of 5-FU. Analysis of TYMS by fluorescence in situ hybridization identified TYMS gene amplification in 23% of 31 5-FU-treated cancers, whereas no amplification was observed in metastases of patients that had not been treated with 5-FU. Patients with metastases containing TYMS amplification had a substantially shorter median survival (329 days) than those without amplification (1,021 days, P <0.01). These data suggest that genetic amplification of TYMS is a major mechanism of 5-FU resistance in vivo and have important implications for the management of colorectal cancer patients with recurrent disease.

Molecular lesions in colorectal cancer: impact on prognosis? Original data and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

In the Dukes' B and C stages of colorectal carcinoma there are considerable variations in the observed courses of the disease. Since post-operative chemotherapy in patients with Dukes' C (node-positive) colon carcinoma has been demonstrated to be effective in improving overall-survival, a more exact prognosis assessment gains additional significance and therapeutic relevance.

DISCUSSION

One also hopes to derive improved prognostic factors from the clarification of the molecular pathogenesis. Because of its frequency and the accessibility and recognizability of its developmental stages colorectal carcinoma is among the best investigated of all solid tumors. Despite a multitude of suggested molecular candidate markers none of these changes has yet been able enter the everyday life of the clinic. However, it is to be expected that some of the molecular alterations presently discussed will gain importance before long in the clinical treatment of patients with colorectal carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

Considering also our own findings, this review presents the latest developments in the scientific discussion of the tumor suppressor/oncogenes p53, k-ras, and DCC, biochemical determinants of the 5-fluorouracil metabolism, and defects of the DNA repair system.

Prediction of sensitivity to fluoropyrimidines by metabolic and target enzyme activities in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to investigate the role of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in tumor progression and sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU).

METHODS

A total of 275 tumor samples from 275 patients with gastric cancer were utilized in this study. TS activity was determined in 130 samples by 5-fluorodeoxyuridine monophosphate binding assay. DPD activity was measured in 140 samples by radioenzymatic assay, and TP protein level was determined in 157 samples by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. These parameters were compared with several clinicopathologic factors and sensitivity to 5-FU determined by in-vitro ATP assay. The antitumor activities of 5-FU, uracil plus tegafur (UFT), and 1M tegafur--0.4 M 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine--1 M potassium oxonate (S-1 [TS-1]) were also compared, using three human gastric cancer xenografts in nude mice.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between either TS or TP and sensitivity to 5-FU. However, a weak inverse correlation was found between DPD activity and sensitivity to 5-FU. High DPD activity in tumor resulted in poor prognosis, especially in patients who received 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Although TP was significantly correlated with depth of tumor invasion and with lymphatic and venous invasions, TP alone had no impact on survival. On the other hand, TS, as well as peritoneal, hepatic, and lymph node metastases, was selected as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. In the animal model, there was no significant difference in antitumor activities among the drugs in a tumor with low DPD activity. However, S-1 showed superior antitumor activity to 5-FU or UFT in tumors with high DPD activity.

CONCLUSION

DPD is considered to be a most important predictive factor of 5-FU sensitivity. The use of DPD inhibitory fluoropyrimidines is strongly recommended for tumors with high DPD activity.

Implications of genetic testing in the management of colorectal cancer

The prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is impacted by various factors at the time of diagnosis, including location of the tumor, gender, age and overall performance status of the patient. Optimal postoperative management of patients who have undergone successful tumor resection involves the utilization of reliable determninants of prognosis to help select patients who would benefit from adjuvant treatment, while sparing others from drug-related adverse effects. Tailoring chemotherapy for patients with disseminated cancer, or for patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy, is also critical. Interpatient differences in tumor response and drug toxicity are common during chemotherapy. Genomic variability of key metabolic enzyme complexes, drug targets, and drug transport molecules is an important contributing factor. The identification of genetic markers of response and prognosis will aid in the development of more individualized chemotherapuetic strategies for cancer patients. Potential prognostic indicators in colorectal cancer include oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, genes involved in angiogenic and apoptotic pathways and cell proliferation, and those encoding targets of chemotherapy. Specifically, molecular markers such as deletion of 18q (DCC), p27 and microsatellite instability are promising as indicators of good or poor prognosis. Molecular determinants of efficacy and host toxicity of the most commonly used drugs in colorectal cancer, fluoracil, irinotecan and oxaliplatin, are being investigated. Alterations in gene expression, protein expression and polymorphic variants in genes encoding thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, dUTP nucleotidehydrolase and thymidine phosphorylase (for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy), uridine diphosphate glucosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 and carboxylesterase (for irinotecan therapy), and excision repair cross-complementing genes (ERCC1 and ERCC2) and glutathione-S-transferase P1 (for oxalilplatin-based regimens) may be useful as markers for clinical drug response, survival and host toxicity.

Thymidylate synthase protein expression in primary colorectal cancer: lack of correlation with outcome and response to fluorouracil in metastatic disease sites

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of quantitating thymidylate synthase (TS) in the primary tumor as a surrogate for metastatic disease sites to predict the likelihood of response and outcome to fluorouracil (FU) treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

METHODS

TS protein expression was evaluated using the TS 106 antibody and the avidin biotin labeling immunohistochemical technique in primary tumor samples from 219 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The patients were a representative sample of those patients enrolled into the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group E2290 protocol that evaluated five separate FU-containing regimens in patients with metastatic residual or recurrent colorectal carcinoma.

RESULTS

Our retrospective analysis found that the level and extent of TS protein expression in the primary tumor did not correlate with overall survival in patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer. A trend toward a direct correlation between the level of TS protein expression and response was noted in tumors that expressed high TS levels. This response advantage for patients expressing high TS levels in the primary tumor was apparent regardless of what FU-based treatment the patient received but was most apparent in the subgroup treated with leucovorin, in which the level of TS expression and response to FU and leucovorin reached statistical significance (P =.034). No significant interaction could be detected between the addition of leucovorin to FU and the level of TS expression in the primary tumor.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that measurement of TS protein levels in the primary tumor tissue does not aid in predicting outcome or response to FU in a metastatic disease site. These assays must be performed on biopsy tissue from the metastatic disease site that is used to radiologically assess response and outcome to treatment.

Predictive markers for colorectal cancer: current status and future prospects

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Although there is clear evidence of the benefit of chemotherapy in adjuvant and metastatic settings, its use continues to be suboptimal because of intrinsic or acquired drug resistance. 5-Fluorouracil continues to be the mainstay of CRC therapy, and combinations with newer chemotherapeutic agents such as irinotecan and oxaliplatin have resulted in improved response rates and survival. The role of other agents including cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor, and farnsyl transferase inhibitors remains to be elucidated. Despite these improvements, many patients undergo chemotherapy without benefit. Increased understanding of the biology of CRC has led to the identification of prognostic markers that may help identify patients who will benefit from chemotherapy. Furthermore, studies have also begun to identify markers that predict whether a tumor will respond to a particular chemotherapy. The ultimate goal of this research is to prospectively identify patients who should receive chemotherapy and, thus, to tailor treatment to the molecular profile of the tumor and patient. Such an approach has the potential to dramatically improve response rates. This review highlights potentially important prognostic and predictive factors in CRC and discusses the potential for their use in the treatment of this disease.

Thymidylate synthase and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase expression in oral squamous cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and clinicopathologic study

OBJECTIVE

Thymidylate synthase (TS) is the target enzyme for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the first enzyme that metabolizes 5-fluorouracil. Until now, only the enzyme activities of TS and DPD have been investigated; however, there are few reports about the immunohistochemistry of TS and DPD and none regarding oral carcinoma. The purpose of this article was to investigate the expression of TS and DPD in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

In this study, 109 oral squamous cell carcinomas were investigated for the immunohistochemical expression of TS and DPD proteins.

RESULTS

The expressions of TS in carcinoma cases was significantly higher than in controls (P <.05, t test). DPD was expressed both in carcinomas and in areas adjacent to the carcinomas. There was no correlation between the clinical factors and the TS labeling index or between the clinical factors and the DPD labeling index (DPD-LI). Pathologically, DPD-LI was significantly different in both the World Health Organization classification and Anneroth's classification. The TS labeling index was significantly correlated with the Ki-67 LI (P <.05, Pearson's correlation coefficient). Although TS showed no correlation between tegafur-uracil response and TS labeling index, there was a significant correlation between the tegafur-uracil response and DPD-LI.

CONCLUSIONS

TS may reveal tumor cell proliferation, but DPD-LI may correlate with a response to anticancer drug treatment.

Role of biological markers in the clinical outcome of colon cancer

We investigated a number of biological markers, evaluated under strict intralaboratory quality control conditions, in terms of their role in predicting clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer treated with 5-FU-containing regimens. Colon cancer tissue from 263 patients enrolled onto two randomised clinical trials were studied for their cytofluorimetrically determined DNA content and their immunohistochemically evaluated microvessel density, vascular endothelial growth factor expression, thymidylate synthase expression and tumour lymphocyte infiltration. Disease-free survival and overall survival of patients were analysed as a function of the different variables. At a median follow up of 57 months, age, gender and Dukes' stage showed an impact on disease-free survival, whereas no biological marker emerged as an indicator of better or worse disease-free survival. Only histological grade and Dukes' stage were found to influence overall survival. The different biological variables, studied with particular attention for determination reliability, proved to have no impact on the clinical outcome of patients with colon cancer. Therefore, other markers must be identified to complement clinico-pathological variables in the management of this disease.

Retrospective study on thymidylate synthase as a predictor of outcome and sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer

We carried out a retrospective evaluation of thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumor tissue, and its relation to outcome and response to treatment. The treatment consisted of chemotherapy with tegafur and uracil (UFT). The study group comprised 245 patients with curatively resected Dukes' stage B or C colorectal cancer who were postoperatively enrolled in a controlled study and assigned to receive UFT or no adjuvant chemotherapy. TS expression in tumor tissue was evaluated immunohistochemically with the use of recombinant human TS-specific antibody. Results were as follows. There was no relation between TS expression and the rate of 5-year disease-free survival. Similar results were obtained in both colonic and rectal tumors. The rate of 5-year disease-free survival was significantly higher in the UFT group than in the group receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy ( =0.0055). The difference in survival became more marked among patients whose tumors had diffuse TS expression ( =0.0027). There was no difference in survival between the treatment groups among patients whose tumors had focal TS expression. We conclude that, although unrelated to outcome, TS activity may be useful in predicting the response to adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT in patients with curatively resected Dukes' stage B or C colorectal cancer.

Prognostic value of tumoral thymidylate synthase and p53 in metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy: phenotypic and genotypic analyses

PURPOSE

The aim of this multicenter prospective study was to evaluate the role of intratumoral parameters related to fluorouracil (FU) sensitivity in 103 metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving FU-folinic acid.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Liver metastatic biopsy specimens were obtained for all patients and primary tumor biopsy specimens for 54 patients. Thymidylate synthase (TS), folylpolyglutamate synthetase, and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase were measured by radioenzymatic assays; TS promoter polymorphism (2R/2R v 2R/3R v 3R/3R) was determined by polymerase chain reaction; and p53 protein and mutations were analyzed by immunoluminometric assay and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, respectively.

RESULTS

p53 mutations were observed in 56.7% of metastases. TS activity was significantly higher in 2R/3R tumors as compared with 2R/2R or 3R/3R. TS activity in metastasis was the only parameter linked to clinical responsiveness (responders exhibited the lower TS, P =.047). Univariate Cox analyses demonstrated that TS activity in primary tumor (the greater the TS, the poorer the survival; P =.040), TS promoter polymorphism in primary tumor (risk of death of 2R/3R v 2R/2R, 2.68; P =.035), and p53 stop mutation in metastasis (risk of death of stop mutations v wild type, 3.14; P =.018) were the only significant biologic predictors of specific survival. Stepwise analysis did not discriminate between TS activity and TS polymorphism.

CONCLUSION

Present results confirm the value of tumoral TS activity for predicting FU responsiveness, point out the importance of detailed p53 mutation analysis for predicting survival, and suggest that TS genotype in primary tumor carries a prognostic value similar to that of TS activity.

Systemic treatment of colorectal cancer

Palliative and adjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer has been, until recently, largely dependent on 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. Oral fluoropyrimidines have been evaluated in the advanced disease setting and they appear to be as effective as 5-FU, but are safer and more convenient for most patients. Irinotecan and oxaliplatin are new cytotoxic agents, which are active in 5-FU-resistant disease, but which may also be combined with 5-FU as initial therapy in advanced disease. Initial combination therapy leads to improved response rates and more prolonged progression-free survival compared with 5-FU monotherapy. Standard regimens for adjuvant therapy usually involve 6 months of chemotherapy using 5-FU and folinic acid. Recent trials of capecitabine, oxaliplatin and irinotecan in the adjuvant setting are ongoing, or have recently completed accrual, and may lead to a change in future clinical practice. Biological therapies are playing an increasing role in the management of colorectal cancer. Farnesyl transferase inhibition, inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are undergoing evaluation in advanced disease. In the adjuvant setting, both passive and active immunotherapeutic approaches have been studied. In addition, a large trial will evaluate the role of cyclo-oxygenase(COX)-2 inhibitors as adjuvant therapy. Further research is required in order to define the optimal sequence and combination of these different cytotoxic and biological therapies, in order to secure the best possible outcome for various subgroups of patients with both early and advanced stage colorectal cancer.

G(1)/S but not G(0)/G(1)cell fraction is related to 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity

BACKGROUND

Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry is of clinical interest for making treatment decisions or for predicting response and survival, through proliferation rate (labeling index or S-phase fraction) assessment or T(pot) calculation. Thymidylate synthase expression was tested in vitro, in vivo, and clinically as a prognostic factor for 5-fluorouracil (5FU) sensitivity. However, results were still controversial. Moreover, we had reported that 5FU sensitivity was related to the labeling index of untreated cell cultures.

METHODS

We used six human cancer cell lines that exhibited a wide range of 5FU sensitivity. Cell cycle analysis was performed using flow cytometry monovariate propidium iodide (PI) analysis and bivariate distributions of BrdU incorporation versus DNA content. 5FU sensitivity was assayed using a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) colorimetric assay.

RESULTS

In all cell lines, 5FU exposure resulted in a statistically significant G(1)/S accumulation. No statistically significant relationship was seen between G(0)/G(1) delay determined by monovariate analysis and 5FU sensitivity. However, 5FU sensitivity was statistically correlated to the labeling index and G(1)/S subpopulation assessed with bivariate analysis using BrdU incorporation versus DNA content.

CONCLUSIONS

Cellular proliferation parameters using BrdU incorporation are more informative than PI for in vitro 5FU sensitivity. Because BrdU incorporation could be assessed clinically, it could also be informative for 5FU clinical response prediction.