1
|
Wilhøft Kristensen A, Lunde Jensen A, Jensen K, Oksbjerre Dalton S, Friborg J, Grau C. Exploring patient-reported barriers to participating in proton therapy clinical trials. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100230. [PMID: 38186677 PMCID: PMC10767209 DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2023.100230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Clinical trials lead the progress in healthcare. To ensure reliable research conclusions, it is essential to enroll diverse patient groups. Identifying and understanding patient-reported barriers to clinical trials may help enhance recruitment among diverse patient groups.The clinical potential of proton therapy (PT) to reduce late effects is being investigated in clinical trials worldwide. Thus, for some patients, PT is only accessible by participating in clinical trials.Individuals with smoking-related head and neck cancer (HNC) are sometimes socioeconomically deprived, leading to barriers to trial participation. This study aims to identify barriers to their participation in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) involving PT. Method Interviews were conducted with 14 HNC patients declining participation in an RCT involving PT. The interviews were transcribed and systematically analysed using an inductive approach identifying categories and themes. Results The identified barriers to RCT-participation are: (1) existential distress, which influenced participants' mental and cognitive capacities, (2) insufficient RCT-related knowledge arising from information overload during clinical consultations, (3) the wish for safety and familiarity during the treatment trajectory, particularly for participants needing accommodation during radiotherapy, and (4) the motivation for study participation was impacted by uncertainty due to randomisation and clinical equipoise. Existential distress is identified as an overarching theme because it influences and amplifies the other three themes. Conclusion Existential distress is a central theme that influences and amplifies other participation barriers in PT RCTs. It affects participants' comprehension of trial information, their preference for familiar environments, and their motivation to participate in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Wilhøft Kristensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Annesofie Lunde Jensen
- Steno Diabetes Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| | | | - Jeppe Friborg
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul Jensens Boulevard 25, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Odedina FT, Wieland ML, Barbel-Johnson K, Crook JM. Community Engagement Strategies for Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Populations. Mayo Clin Proc 2024; 99:159-171. [PMID: 38176825 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
The representation of racial and ethnic minority populations in clinical trials continues to be a challenge despite mandates, good intentions, and concerted efforts by funding agencies, regulatory bodies, and researchers to close the clinical trials gap. A lack of diversity in research results in both continued disparities and poorer health outcomes. It is thus imperative that investigators understand and effectively address the challenges of clinical trials participation by underrepresented populations. In this paper, we expound on best practices for participatory research by clearly defining the community, highlighting the importance of proper identification and engagement of strong community partners, and exploring patient- and provider-level barriers and facilitators that require consideration. A clearer understanding of the balance of power between researchers and community partners is needed for any approach that addresses clinical trials representation. Unintended biases in study design and methods may continue to prevent racial and ethnic minority participants from taking part, and significant organizational changes are necessary for efficient and transparent relationships. Comprehensive community engagement in research includes dissemination of clinical trial results within and in partnership with community partners. Through careful deliberation and honest reflection, investigators, institutions, and community partners can develop the tailored blueprints of research collaborations essential for true equity in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark L Wieland
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Jennifer M Crook
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou Y, Shadbolt C, Thuraisingam S, Schilling C, Choong P, Dowsey M. Differences in Outcomes Between Initial Responders and Subsequent Responders to Health Questionnaires for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: An Australian Tertiary Institutional Registry Study. J Arthroplasty 2023; 38:2561-2567. [PMID: 37286051 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.05.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) questionnaires in national arthroplasty registries often have low response rates leading to questions about data reliability. In Australia, the SMART (St. Vincent's Melbourne Arthroplasty Outcomes) registry captures all elective total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty patients with an approximate 98% response rate for preoperative and 12-month PROM scores. This high response rate is due to dedicated registry staff following up patients who do not initially respond (subsequent responders). This study compared initial responders to subsequent responders to find differences in 12-month PROM outcomes for THA and TKA. METHODS All elective THA and TKA patients for osteoarthritis from 2012 to 2021 captured by the SMART registry were included. In total, 1,333 THA and 1,340 TKA patients were included. The PROM scores were assessed using the Veterans-RAND 12 (VR12) and Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaires. The primary outcome was differences in mean 12-month PROM scores between initial and subsequent responders. RESULTS Baseline characteristics and PROM scores were similar between initial and subsequent responders. However, 12-month PROM scores varied significantly. The adjusted mean difference showed that for the WOMAC pain score, subsequent responders scored 3.4 points higher in the THA cohort and 7.4 points higher in the TKA cohort compared to initial responders. Significant differences were also found in other WOMAC and VR12 scores for both THA and TKA cohorts at the 12-month timepoint. CONCLUSION This study found that significant differences in PROM outcomes postsurgery occurred in THA and TKA patients based on response to PROM questionnaires, suggesting that loss to follow-up in PROM outcomes should not be treated as missing completely at random (MCAR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yushy Zhou
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Cade Shadbolt
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sharmala Thuraisingam
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Chris Schilling
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Choong
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Dowsey
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, The University of Melbourne, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Feijoo-Cid M, Arreciado Marañón A, Huertas A, Rivero-Santana A, Cesar C, Fink V, Fernández-Cano MI, Sued O. Exploring the Decision-Making Process of People Living with HIV Enrolled in Antiretroviral Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Study of Decisions Guided by Trust and Emotions. HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS 2023; 31:135-155. [PMID: 37479908 PMCID: PMC10693520 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-023-00461-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023]
Abstract
The informed consent is an ethical and legal requirement for potential participants to enroll in a study. There is ample of evidence that understanding consent information and enrollment is challenging for participants in clinical trials. On the other hand, the reasoning process behind decision-making in HIV clinical trials remains mostly unexplored. This study aims to examine the decision-making process of people living with HIV currently participating in antiretroviral clinical trials and their understanding of informed consent. We conducted a qualitative socio-constructivist study using semi-structured interviews. Eleven participants were selected by purposive sampling in Argentina until data saturation was reached. A content analysis was performed. The findings highlight the fact that some participants decided to enroll on the spot, while others made the decision a few days later. In all cases, the decision was based on different aspects of trust (in doctors, in the clinical research site, in the clinical trials system) but also on emotions associated with HIV and/or treatment. Moreover, while people living with HIV felt truly informed after the consent dialogue with a researcher, consent forms were unintelligible and unfriendly. The immediacy of patient decision-making has rarely been described before. Enrollment in an HIV clinical trial is mainly a trust-based decision but this does not contradict the ethical values of autonomy, voluntariness, non-manipulation, and non-exploitation. Thus, trust is a key issue to be included in reshaping professional practices to ensure the integrity of the informed consent process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Feijoo-Cid
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Can Domènech, Edifici M, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de REcerca Multidisciplinar en Salut i Societat (GREMSAS), (2017 SGR 917), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonia Arreciado Marañón
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Can Domènech, Edifici M, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain.
- Grup de REcerca Multidisciplinar en Salut i Societat (GREMSAS), (2017 SGR 917), Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | - Amado Rivero-Santana
- Canary Islands Foundation-Health Research (FIISC), Tenerife, Spain
- Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - María Isabel Fernández-Cano
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Can Domènech, Edifici M, Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Barcelona, Spain
- Grup de REcerca Multidisciplinar en Salut i Societat (GREMSAS), (2017 SGR 917), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Omar Sued
- Fundación Huésped, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Corcoran L, Friedenreich CM, McNeely ML, Culos-Reed NS, Bell G, Dickau L, Courneya KS, Vallance JK. A qualitative study examining newly diagnosed breast cancer patients' experiences of participating in the Alberta Moving Beyond Breast Cancer (AMBER) prospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:500. [PMID: 37268901 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10967-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions to participate in cancer trials are associated with uncertainty, distress, wanting to help find a cure, the hope for benefit, and altruism. There is a gap in the literature regarding research examining participation in prospective cohort studies. The aim of this study was to examine the experiences of newly diagnosed women with breast cancer participating in the AMBER Study to identify potential strategies to support patients' recruitment, retention, and motivation. METHODS Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were recruited from the Alberta Moving Beyond Breast Cancer (AMBER) cohort study. Data were collected using semi-structured conversational interviews with 21 participants from February to May 2020. Transcripts were imported into NVivo software for management, organization, and coding. Inductive content analysis was undertaken. RESULTS Five main concepts associated with recruitment, retention, and motivation to participate were identified. These main concepts included: (1) personal interest in exercise and nutrition; (2) investment in individual results; (3) personal and professional interest in research; (4) burden of assessments; (5) importance of research staff. CONCLUSIONS Breast cancer survivors participating in this prospective cohort study had numerous reasons for participating and these reasons could be considered in future studies to enhance participant recruitment and retention. Improving recruitment and retention in prospective cancer cohort studies could result in more valid and generalizable study findings that could improve the care of cancer survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lynn Corcoran
- Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S-3A3, Canada
| | - Christine M Friedenreich
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Margaret L McNeely
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | | | - Gordon Bell
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Leanne Dickau
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kerry S Courneya
- Faculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeff K Vallance
- Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S-3A3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaczynski M, Benitez G, Mylona EK, Tran QL, Atalla E, Tsikala-Vafea M, Kalagara S, Shehadeh F, Mylonakis E. Factors Associated With Enrollment into Inpatient Coronavirus Disease 2019 Randomized Controlled Trials: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad197. [PMID: 37180601 PMCID: PMC10173548 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical trials for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have struggled to achieve diverse patient enrollment, despite underrepresented groups bearing the largest burden of the disease and, presumably, being most in need of the treatments under investigation. Methods To assess the willingness of patients to enroll into inpatient COVID-19 clinical trials when invited, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 who were approached regarding enrollment. Associations between patient and temporal factors and enrollment were assessed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 926 patients were included in this analysis. Overall, Hispanic/Latinx ethnicity was associated with a nearly half-fold decrease in the likelihood to enroll (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.60 [95% confidence interval {CI}, .41-.88]). Greater baseline disease severity (aOR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.17]), age 40-64 years (aOR, 1.83 [95% CI, 1.03-3.25]), and age ≥65 years (aOR, 1.92 [95% CI, 1.08-3.42]) were each independently associated with higher likelihood to enroll. Over the course of the pandemic, patients were less likely to enroll during the summer 2021 wave in COVID-19-related hospitalizations (aOR, 0.14 [95% CI, .10-.19]) compared with patients from the first wave in winter 2020. Conclusions The decision to enroll into clinical trials is multifactorial. Amid a pandemic disproportionately affecting vulnerable groups, Hispanic/Latinx patients were less likely to participate when invited, whereas older adults were more likely. Future recruitment strategies must consider the nuanced perceptions and needs of diverse patient populations to ensure equitable trial participation that advances the quality of healthcare for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Kaczynski
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Gregorio Benitez
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Evangelia K Mylona
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Quynh-Lam Tran
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Eleftheria Atalla
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Maria Tsikala-Vafea
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Saisanjana Kalagara
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Fadi Shehadeh
- Infectious Diseases Division, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
- School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Mylonakis
- Correspondence: Eleftherios Mylonakis, MD, PhD, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, FIDSA, 6550 Fannin, Smith Tower 1001, Houston, TX 77030 ()
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
"Nothing to lose and the possibility of gaining": a qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of registry-based randomised controlled trials among cancer patients and clinicians. Trials 2023; 24:92. [PMID: 36747274 PMCID: PMC9902247 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07109-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the "gold standard" for evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in clinical research. However, conventional RCTs are typically complex, expensive, and have narrow eligibility criteria, which limits generalisability. Registry-based randomised controlled trials (RRCTs) are an alternative approach that integrates the internal validity of an RCT with the external validity of a clinical registry by recruiting real-world patients and leveraging an existing registry platform for data collection. As RRCT is a novel research design, there has been limited research on the feasibility and acceptability of RRCTs from the patients' and trial team's perspectives. This study aims to explore patients', clinicians', and study coordinators' perspectives towards participation in and conduct of oncology RRCTs in Australia. METHODS Thirty-seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 cancer patients, 15 clinicians, and 7 study coordinators. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three overarching themes were identified: (1) enablers and barriers to recruitment and enrolment of patients in RRCTs, (2) experiences of patients participating in RRCTs, and (3) recommendations for the implementation of future RRCTs. For patients, altruism and "trust in the clinician" were key reasons to participate in a RRCT. For clinicians and clinical trial coordinators, the RRCT study design was perceived as "simple and straightforward" but "less exciting" than RCTs. Competition from commercially sponsored RCTs poses challenges for investigator-led RRCTs recruitment, particularly if eligible patient numbers are low. There were limited impacts on patients' treatment experiences and clinicians' clinical workflow given that the RRCTs explored different standards of care. Recommendations to improve the enrolment of patients in RRCTs included generating greater buy-in from clinicians by increasing awareness of RRCTs via education initiatives and broader promotion of the "selling point" of RRCTs and providing monetary compensation to hospitals for enrolling patients. CONCLUSIONS Whilst patients, clinicians, and study coordinators were generally supportive of RRCTs, several barriers to effective RRCT implementation in oncology were identified. Developing strategies to increase acceptance of the methodology by clinicians will help enhance the uptake of RRCTs in Australia and internationally.
Collapse
|
8
|
Aabdien M, Abdallah I, Bougmiza MI, Siepmann T, Illigens B. Perceptions and attitudes toward participation in clinical research in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29959. [PMID: 35984206 PMCID: PMC9388020 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Successful recruitment of participants into clinical research has always been challenging and is affected by many factors. This systematic review aimed to explore the perceptions and attitudes as well as identify the factors affecting the participation in clinical research among the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office countries' population. METHODS A systematic search of the literature was conducted to explore attitudes or perceptions of the general public or patients towards participation in clinical research. PubMed, Pro-Quest Central, World Health Organizations Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they presented primary data and were conducted in one of the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office countries. A data extraction sheet was used to record the following: year, country, aim, population, sample size, study design, data collection, and setting. The identified factors from the included studies were categorized into motivators and barriers. RESULTS In total, 23 original research articles were identified that addressed perceptions or attitudes towards clinical research participation. Six main motivators and barriers of research participation among patients, the general public, and patient family members were identified. The most common cited motivators included personal benefits to the individual, altruism and the desire to help others, the research process, the influence of the physician, family encouragement, and religion. Concerns regarding safety, confidentiality, and other factors in addition to the research process, lack of trust in healthcare providers or healthcare system, lack of interest in research and no perceived personal benefit, religious concerns, and family/cultural concerns were the most cited barriers to participation. CONCLUSION The identified motivators and barriers are essential to tackle during clinical research planning among the population of Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office countries. Further research is needed to assess the attitudes and perceptions of individuals approached to participate in trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Aabdien
- Community Medicine Training Program: Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
- Division of Health Care Sciences, Center for Clinical Research and Management Education Dresden International University, Dresden, Germany
- * Correspondence: Mohamed Aabdien, Community Medicine Training Program, Medical Education, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar (e-mail: )
| | | | - Mohamed Iheb Bougmiza
- Workforce Development & Training – Family & Community Medicine Department, Primary Health Care Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Timo Siepmann
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ben Illigens
- Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cummings M, Pradhan S, Madhavan S. Understanding factors contributing to participant satisfaction in stroke walking recovery clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 28:100945. [PMID: 35754974 PMCID: PMC9213227 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Individuals with stroke face a distinct set of challenges, barriers and facilitators that need to be understood to streamline efficacy of stroke clinical trials and improve participant retention. Few long-term stroke rehabilitation trials have evaluated participant perception of their laboratory experience. Methods We collected data regarding trial satisfaction from 33 individuals with stroke who participated in 12 sessions of treadmill training which included pre, post and follow-up non-invasive brain stimulation and clinical assessments. We evaluated factors such as overall trial satisfaction, burden of testing, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, and perceived support using a participant satisfaction questionnaire (PSQ) that assessed participants' overall trial experience. Results 97% of our participants found participating in the study to be rewarding and would recommend it to other persons with stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) testing was found to be the major perceived burden of participation while travelling to the lab was found to be the major perceived barrier to participation. Significant correlations were found between various items of the PSQ and clinical assessments. Conclusions This study helped us get a preliminary perspective into the benefits and barriers faced by persons with stroke enrolled in a 4-week long clinical trial. We observed that participant satisfaction was driven by various factors including functional status, personal relevance to the research, perceptive physical and mental health improvements, interaction with research personnel, and ease of testing protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Cummings
- Brain Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.,Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sonia Pradhan
- Brain Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.,Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sangeetha Madhavan
- Brain Plasticity Laboratory, Department of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Senerchia CM, Ohrt TL, Payne PN, Cheng S, Wimmer D, Margolin-Katz I, Tian D, Garber L, Abbott S, Webster B. Using passive extraction of real-world data from eConsent, electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) and electronic health record (EHR) data loaded to an electronic data capture (EDC) system for a multi-center, prospective, observational study in diabetic patients. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 28:100920. [PMID: 35573388 PMCID: PMC9097692 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia M. Senerchia
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Tracy L. Ohrt
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | - Peter N. Payne
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Samantha Cheng
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - David Wimmer
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Irene Margolin-Katz
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Devin Tian
- Optum Insight, Life Sciences, Digital Research Network, 11000 Optum Circle, Eden Prairie, MN, 55344, USA
| | - Lawrence Garber
- Reliant Medical Group, 640 Lincoln Street, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA
| | - Stephanie Abbott
- Western Washington Medical Group, 1728 W, Marine View Drive, Suite 110, Everett, WA, 98201, USA
| | - Brian Webster
- Wilmington Health, 1202 Medical Center Drive, Wilmington, NC, 28401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sandhu VK, Duro T, Kamboj A, Salto L, Chiruvolu N. Barriers to Enrollment in Rheumatology Research: Who, What, Where, When, and Why? Cureus 2022; 14:e27235. [PMID: 36039219 PMCID: PMC9400834 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the evidence that complicated rheumatic diseases are more prevalent and severe in ethnic minorities, rheumatology research is afflicted with inadequate patient representation. It is lacking in ethnic and socioeconomic diversity. The objective of this study is to identify barriers to enrollment in rheumatology research and propose possible solutions to overcome these barriers. In this study, 184 patients from two rheumatology clinics (Safety Net clinic, a university-based clinic) were surveyed for concerns regarding participation in clinical research. Patients were asked to rank their top five of eight concerns. Data were then stratified by self-reported ethnicity and clinic site to determine ranking differences in both groups. Fear of risks associated with clinical research was ranked as the primary barrier in all ethnicities. More non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) (24.4%) ranked work responsibilities as a primary barrier compared to Hispanics (10%). Fear of discovering a serious illness as a primary barrier was more frequent at the Safety Net clinic (25%) compared to the university-based clinic (6.3%) and ranked more frequently in the top five in Hispanics compared to NHW. Fears associated with research risks, work responsibilities, and fear of discovering a serious illness were the top-ranked barriers to enrollment in research among patients. However, differences in rankings between ethnicities and clinic sites were identified. This sheds light on the importance of health literacy and the responsibility of researchers in addressing gaps in communication while acknowledging potential cultural components that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Czwikla J, Herzberg A, Kapp S, Kloep S, Rothgang H, Nitschke I, Haffner C, Hoffmann F. Generalizability and reach of a randomized controlled trial to improve oral health among home care recipients: comparing participants and nonparticipants at baseline and during follow-up. Trials 2022; 23:560. [PMID: 35804423 PMCID: PMC9264743 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06470-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The generalizability of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a low response can be limited by systematic differences between participants and nonparticipants. This participation bias, however, is rarely investigated because data on nonparticipants is usually not available. The purpose of this article is to compare all participants and nonparticipants of a RCT to improve oral health among home care recipients at baseline and during follow-up using claims data. Methods Seven German statutory health and long-term care insurance funds invited 9656 home care recipients to participate in the RCT MundPflege. Claims data for all participants (n = 527, 5.5% response) and nonparticipants (n = 9129) were analyzed. Associations between trial participation and sex, age, care dependency, number of Elixhauser diseases, and dementia, as well as nursing, medical, and dental care utilization at baseline, were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. Associations between trial participation and the probability of (a) moving into a nursing home, (b) being hospitalized, and (c) death during 1 year of follow-up were examined via Cox proportional hazards regressions, controlling for baseline variables. Results At baseline, trial participation was positively associated with male sex (odds ratio 1.29 [95% confidence interval 1.08–1.54]), high (vs. low 1.46 [1.15–1.86]) care dependency, receiving occasional in-kind benefits to relieve caring relatives (1.45 [1.15–1.84]), having a referral by a general practitioner to a medical specialist (1.62 [1.21–2.18]), and dental care utilization (2.02 [1.67–2.45]). It was negatively associated with being 75–84 (vs. < 60 0.67 [0.50–0.90]) and 85 + (0.50 [0.37–0.69]) years old. For morbidity, hospitalizations, and formal, respite, short-term, and day or night care, no associations were found. During follow-up, participants were less likely to move into a nursing home than nonparticipants (hazard ratio 0.50 [0.32–0.79]). For hospitalizations and mortality, no associations were found. Conclusions For half of the comparisons, differences between participants and nonparticipants were observed. The RCT’s generalizability is limited, but to a smaller extent than one would expect because of the low response. Routine data provide a valuable source for investigating potential differences between trial participants and nonparticipants, which might be used by future RCTs to evaluate the generalizability of their findings. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00013517. Retrospectively registered on June 11, 2018. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06470-y.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Czwikla
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany. .,Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany. .,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
| | - Alexandra Herzberg
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Sonja Kapp
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Stephan Kloep
- High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,Competence Center for Clinical Trials, University of Bremen, Linzer Straße 4, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Heinz Rothgang
- Department of Health, Long-Term Care and Pensions, SOCIUM Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy, University of Bremen, Mary-Somerville-Straße 5, 28359, Bremen, Germany.,High-Profile Area of Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bibliothekstraße 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ina Nitschke
- Division of Gerodontology, Clinic of Prosthetic Dentistry and Dental Materials Science, University Medical Center, Liebigstraße 10-14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.,Clinic of General, Special Care and Geriatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Plattenstraße 11, CH-8032, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cornelius Haffner
- Special Care- and Geriatric Dentistry, Städtisches Klinikum Harlaching München, Sanatoriumsplatz 2, 81545, Munich, Germany
| | - Falk Hoffmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Ammerländer Heerstraße 114-118, 26129, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
The psychosocial responses of patients in cancer clinical trials: are they a barrier to participation? JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2022. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396922000139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction:
This paper aims to discuss the psychosocial concomitants with involvement in oncology clinical trials, focusing on barriers that can impact upon participation. It will conclude with some recommendations for strategies to address potential psychosocial barriers with the aim of increasing trial participation rates.
Materials and methods:
A literature search was carried out using CINAHL, PubMed and EMCare databases with the following keywords for filtering: psychological distress, clinical trials, participation and oncology. The final selection of papers that met the inclusion criteria for this review was manually subjected to Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool for relevance.
Results:
Thirteen papers were included in the review. The dominant theme within the literature is psychosocial obstacles to oncology clinical trial participation. Five key barriers were identified: anxiety and fear; ethnicity and social background; tensions between scientific objectives and personal motivations to participation; tensions between personal benefits versus altruism; carer perspectives.
Conclusions:
The key barriers discussed led to the identification of a set of strategies to help mediate conflicting tensions and motivations of trial enrolment with a view to increasing participation rates. Further prospective research garnering primary data investigating both the psychological and psychosocial factors influencing cancer clinical trial participation for patients needs to be undertaken.
Collapse
|
14
|
Understanding potential barriers and enablers to a perioperative early phase cell therapy trial. Cytotherapy 2022; 24:629-638. [PMID: 35396169 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AIMS Early-phase cell therapy clinical trials depend on patient and physician involvement, yet barriers can impede their participation. METHODS To optimize engagement for a planned cell therapy trial to prevent perioperative cardiac complications, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with at-risk patients and physicians who could potentially be involved in the study. The authors used the theoretical domains framework to systematically identify potential barriers and enablers. RESULTS Forty-one interviews were conducted to reach data saturation, and four overall potential barriers to participation (themes) were identified. Theme 1 emphasizes that patients and physicians need accessible information to better understand the benefits and risks of the novel therapy and trial procedures and to address misconceptions. Theme 2 underscores the need for clarity on whether the trial's primary purpose is safety or efficacy, as this may influence patient and physician decisions. Theme 3 recognizes the resource and logistic realities for patients (e.g., convenient follow-up appointments) and physicians (e.g., personnel to assist in trial procedures, competing priorities). Theme 4 describes the importance of social influences (e.g., physicians and family, peers/colleagues) that may affect decisions to participate and the importance of patient preferences (e.g., availability of physicians to discuss the trial, including caregivers in discussions). CONCLUSIONS Prospectively addressing these issues may help optimize feasibility prior to conducting an expensive, resource-intensive trial.
Collapse
|
15
|
Outram S, Muñoz KA, Kostick-Quenet K, Sanchez CE, Kalwani L, Lavingia R, Torgerson L, Sierra-Mercado D, Robinson JO, Pereira S, Koenig BA, Starr PA, Gunduz A, Foote KD, Okun MS, Goodman WK, McGuire AL, Zuk P, Lázaro-Muñoz G. Patient, Caregiver, and Decliner Perspectives on Whether to Enroll in Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation Research. Front Neurosci 2021; 15:734182. [PMID: 34690676 PMCID: PMC8529029 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.734182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
This research study provides patient and caregiver perspectives as to whether or not to undergo adaptive deep brain stimulation (aDBS) research. A total of 51 interviews were conducted in a multi-site study including patients undergoing aDBS and their respective caregivers along with persons declining aDBS. Reasons highlighted for undergoing aDBS included hopes for symptom alleviation, declining quality of life, desirability of being in research, and altruism. The primary reasons for not undergoing aDBS issues were practical rather than specific to aDBS technology, although some persons highlighted a desire to not be the first to trial the new technology. These themes are discussed in the context of "push" factors wherein any form of surgical intervention is preferable to none and "pull" factors wherein opportunities to contribute to science combine with hopes and/or expectations for the alleviation of symptoms. We highlight the significance of study design in decision making. aDBS is an innovative technology and not a completely new technology. Many participants expressed value in being part of research as an important consideration. We suggest that there are important implications when comparing patient perspectives vs. theoretical perspectives on the choice for or against aDBS. Additionally, it will be important how we communicate with patients especially in reference to the complexity of study design. Ultimately, this study reveals that there are benefits and potential risks when choosing a research study that involves implantation of a medical device.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Outram
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Katrina A Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kristin Kostick-Quenet
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Clarissa E Sanchez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lavina Kalwani
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Laura Torgerson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Demetrio Sierra-Mercado
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.,Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Barbara A Koenig
- Program in Bioethics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Philip A Starr
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Aysegul Gunduz
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Kelly D Foote
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Michael S Okun
- Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, Program for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration, Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Peter Zuk
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hemming C, Constable L, Goulao B, Kilonzo M, Boyers D, Elders A, Cooper K, Smith A, Freeman R, Breeman S, McDonald A, Hagen S, Montgomery I, Norrie J, Glazener C. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs. Health Technol Assess 2021; 24:1-220. [PMID: 32138809 DOI: 10.3310/hta24130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND New surgical approaches for apical prolapse have gradually been introduced, with few prospective randomised controlled trial data to evaluate their safety and efficacy compared with traditional methods. OBJECTIVE To compare surgical uterine preservation with vaginal hysterectomy in women with uterine prolapse and abdominal procedures with vaginal procedures in women with vault prolapse in terms of clinical effectiveness, adverse events, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. DESIGN Two parallel randomised controlled trials (i.e. Uterine and Vault). Allocation was by remote web-based randomisation (1 : 1 ratio), minimised on the need for concomitant anterior and/or posterior procedure, concomitant incontinence procedure, age and surgeon. SETTING UK hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Uterine trial - 563 out of 565 randomised women had uterine prolapse surgery. Vault trial - 208 out of 209 randomised women had vault prolapse surgery. INTERVENTIONS Uterine trial - uterine preservation or vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial - abdominal or vaginal vault suspension. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measures were women's prolapse symptoms (as measured using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score), prolapse-specific quality of life and cost-effectiveness (as assessed by incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year). RESULTS Uterine trial - adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for uterine preservation was 4.2 (standard deviation 4.9) versus vaginal hysterectomy with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 4.2 (standard deviation 5.3) (mean difference -0.05, 95% confidence interval -0.91 to 0.81). Serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (uterine preservation 5.4% vs. vaginal hysterectomy 5.9%; risk ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 1.75). There was no difference in overall prolapse stage. Significantly more women would recommend vaginal hysterectomy to a friend (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.83). Uterine preservation was £235 (95% confidence interval £6 to £464) more expensive than vaginal hysterectomy and generated non-significantly fewer quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference -0.004, 95% confidence interval -0.026 to 0.019). Vault trial - adjusting for baseline and minimisation covariates, the mean Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score at 12 months for an abdominal procedure was 5.6 (standard deviation 5.4) versus vaginal procedure with a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score of 5.9 (standard deviation 5.4) (mean difference -0.61, 95% confidence interval -2.08 to 0.86). The serious adverse event rates were similar between the groups (abdominal 5.9% vs. vaginal 6.0%; risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.27 to 3.44). The objective anterior prolapse stage 2b or more was higher in the vaginal group than in the abdominal group (odds ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.79). There was no difference in the overall prolapse stage. An abdominal procedure was £570 (95% confidence interval £459 to £682) more expensive than a vaginal procedure and generated non-significantly more quality-adjusted life-years (mean difference 0.004, 95% confidence interval -0.031 to 0.041). CONCLUSIONS Uterine trial - in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between uterine preservation and vaginal hysterectomy. Vault trial - in terms of efficacy, quality of life or adverse events in the short term, no difference was identified between an abdominal and a vaginal approach. FUTURE WORK Long-term follow-up for at least 6 years is ongoing to identify recurrence rates, need for further prolapse surgery, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. TRIAL REGISTRATION Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86784244. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 13. See the National Institute for Health Research Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lynda Constable
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Beatriz Goulao
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mary Kilonzo
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Dwayne Boyers
- Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Elders
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Kevin Cooper
- Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Anthony Smith
- St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Suzanne Breeman
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alison McDonald
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Suzanne Hagen
- Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professionals Research Unit (NMAHP RU), Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
| | - Isobel Montgomery
- Independent patient representative, c/o Health Services Research Unit, Aberdeen, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh BioQuarter, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Cathryn Glazener
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Murphy E, O'Keeffe A, O Shea N, Long E, Eustace JA, Shiely F. Patient perceptions of the challenges of recruitment to a renal randomised trial registry: a pilot questionnaire-based study. Trials 2021; 22:597. [PMID: 34488851 PMCID: PMC8420031 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05526-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for demonstrating the efficacy of new therapies. However, issues of external validity often affect result application to real-world settings. Using registries to conduct RCTs is a reasonably new practice, but is appealing because it combines the benefits of both observational studies and RCTs. There is limited literature on patient motivators, barriers, and consent to registries for conducting RCTs. The purpose of our study was to establish the factors that motivate and/or inhibit patients from joining a registry for RCTs and to determine what information matters to patients when making an enrolment decision to participate in such a registry. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study at a dialysis centre in Southwest Ireland representing a catchment patient population of approximately 430,000. Quantitative data were coded and analysed in SPSS (v16). Descriptive statistics were produced, and open-ended questions were analysed by thematic analysis. Results Eighty-seven patients completed the questionnaire. Reasons for participation in a registry included personal and altruistic benefits. Barriers to participation were time and travel requirements associated with registry participation, data safety concerns, risks, side effects, and concerns that registry participation would impact current treatment. Although 29.8% of patients expressed concern regarding their data being stored in a registry, 79.3% were still willing to consent to have their data uploaded and stored in a registry for conducting RCTs. It was important to patients to have their GP (general practitioner) involved in the decision to participate, despite little day-to-day contact with their GP for renal dialysis management. Conclusion Challenges to recruitment to registries for RCTs exist, but addressing the identified concerns of potential participants may aid patients in making a more informed enrolment decision and may improve recruitment to registries, and by extension, to RCTs conducted using the registry. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05526-9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Murphy
- TRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Aoife O'Keeffe
- TRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Niamh O Shea
- TRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Eva Long
- Department of Nephrology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Joseph A Eustace
- TRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Nephrology, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Frances Shiely
- TRAMS (Trials Research and Methodologies Unit), HRB Clinical Research Facility, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. .,HRB Clinical Research Facility and School of Public Health, University College Cork, 4th Floor Western Gateway Building, Western Road, Cork, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Realpe AX, Blackstone J, Griffin DR, Bing AJF, Karski M, Milner SA, Siddique M, Goldberg A. Barriers to recruitment to an orthopaedic randomized controlled trial comparing two surgical procedures for ankle arthritis : a qualitative study. Bone Jt Open 2021; 2:631-637. [PMID: 34378406 PMCID: PMC8384444 DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.28.bjo-2021-0074.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims A multicentre, randomized, clinician-led, pragmatic, parallel-group orthopaedic trial of two surgical procedures was set up to obtain high-quality evidence of effectiveness. However, the trial faced recruitment challenges and struggled to maintain recruitment rates over 30%, although this is not unusual for surgical trials. We conducted a qualitative study with the aim of gathering information about recruitment practices to identify barriers to patient consent and participation to an orthopaedic trial. Methods We collected 11 audio recordings of recruitment appointments and interviews of research team members (principal investigators and research nurses) from five hospitals involved in recruitment to an orthopaedic trial. We analyzed the qualitative data sets thematically with the aim of identifying aspects of informed consent and information provision that was either unclear, disrupted, or hindered trial recruitment. Results Recruiters faced four common obstacles when recruiting to a surgical orthopaedic trial: patient preferences for an intervention; a complex recruitment pathway; various logistical issues; and conflicting views on equipoise. Clinicians expressed concerns that the trial may not show significant differences in the treatments, validating their equipoise. However, they experienced role conflicts due to their own preference and perceived patient preference for an intervention arm. Conclusion This study provided initial information about barriers to recruitment to an orthopaedic randomized controlled trial. We shared these findings in an all-site investigators’ meeting and encouraged researchers to find solutions to identified barriers; this led to the successful completion of recruitment. Complex trials may benefit for using of a mixed-methods approach to mitigate against recruitment failure, and to improve patient participation and informed consent. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(8):631–637.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alba X Realpe
- Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - James Blackstone
- Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Andrew J F Bing
- Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District Hospital NHS Trust, Oswestry, Shropshire, UK
| | - Michael Karski
- Foot and Ankle Surgery, Wrightington Hospital, Wigan, UK
| | - Stephen A Milner
- University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Malik Siddique
- Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Andrew Goldberg
- The Wellington Hospital, London, UK.,Imperial College London, London, UK.,UCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, Stanmore, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rogers JR, Lee J, Zhou Z, Cheung YK, Hripcsak G, Weng C. Contemporary use of real-world data for clinical trial conduct in the United States: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28:144-154. [PMID: 33164065 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Real-world data (RWD), defined as routinely collected healthcare data, can be a potential catalyst for addressing challenges faced in clinical trials. We performed a scoping review of database-specific RWD applications within clinical trial contexts, synthesizing prominent uses and themes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Querying 3 biomedical literature databases, research articles using electronic health records, administrative claims databases, or clinical registries either within a clinical trial or in tandem with methodology related to clinical trials were included. Articles were required to use at least 1 US RWD source. All abstract screening, full-text screening, and data extraction was performed by 1 reviewer. Two reviewers independently verified all decisions. RESULTS Of 2020 screened articles, 89 qualified: 59 articles used electronic health records, 29 used administrative claims, and 26 used registries. Our synthesis was driven by the general life cycle of a clinical trial, culminating into 3 major themes: trial process tasks (51 articles); dissemination strategies (6); and generalizability assessments (34). Despite a diverse set of diseases studied, <10% of trials using RWD for trial process tasks evaluated medications or procedures (5/51). All articles highlighted data-related challenges, such as missing values. DISCUSSION Database-specific RWD have been occasionally leveraged for various clinical trial tasks. We observed underuse of RWD within conducted medication or procedure trials, though it is subject to the confounder of implicit report of RWD use. CONCLUSION Enhanced incorporation of RWD should be further explored for medication or procedure trials, including better understanding of how to handle related data quality issues to facilitate RWD use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Rogers
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Junghwan Lee
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ziheng Zhou
- Institute of Human Nutrition, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ying Kuen Cheung
- Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA, and
| | - George Hripcsak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.,Medical Informatics Services, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Chunhua Weng
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A knowledge base of clinical trial eligibility criteria. J Biomed Inform 2021; 117:103771. [PMID: 33813032 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2021.103771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We present the Clinical Trial Knowledge Base, a regularly updated knowledge base of discrete clinical trial eligibility criteria equipped with a web-based user interface for querying and aggregate analysis of common eligibility criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used a natural language processing (NLP) tool named Criteria2Query (Yuan et al., 2019) to transform free text clinical trial eligibility criteria from ClinicalTrials.gov into discrete criteria concepts and attributes encoded using the widely adopted Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) and stored in a relational SQL database. A web application accessible via RESTful APIs was implemented to enable queries and visual aggregate analyses. We demonstrate CTKB's potential role in EHR phenotype knowledge engineering using ten validated phenotyping algorithms. RESULTS At the time of writing, CTKB contained 87,504 distinctive OMOP CDM standard concepts, including Condition (47.82%), Drug (23.01%), Procedure (13.73%), Measurement (24.70%) and Observation (5.28%), with 34.78% for inclusion criteria and 65.22% for exclusion criteria, extracted from 352,110 clinical trials. The average hit rate of criteria concepts in eMERGE phenotype algorithms is 77.56%. CONCLUSION CTKB is a novel comprehensive knowledge base of discrete eligibility criteria concepts with the potential to enable knowledge engineering for clinical trial cohort definition, clinical trial population representativeness assessment, electronical phenotyping, and data gap analyses for using electronic health records to support clinical trial recruitment.
Collapse
|
21
|
Lech S, O'Sullivan JL, Wellmann L, Supplieth J, Döpfmer S, Gellert P, Kuhlmey A, Nordheim J. Recruiting general practitioners and patients with dementia into a cluster randomised controlled trial: strategies, barriers and facilitators. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:61. [PMID: 33784967 PMCID: PMC8008594 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01253-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recruitment of general practitioners (GPs) and their patients is reported as one of the most challenging steps when undertaking primary care research. The present paper describes the recruitment process of a cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) aiming to improve dementia care in the primary care setting. Methods Recruitment data was analysed descriptively using frequency tables to investigate comparisons of recruitment rates and results of different recruitment strategies as well as reasons for participation and non-participation of GPs, patients with dementia (PwD) and their caregivers. Results Over a period of 23 months, N = 28 GPs were successfully included in the cRCT. This represents an overall recruitment rate of 4.6%. The most efficient strategy in terms of high response and low labour-intensity involved the dissemination of calls for participation in a GP research network. Most frequently reported reasons for GP’s participation were Improvement of patient’s well-being (n = 22, 79%) followed by Interest in dementia research (n = 18, 64%). The most common reasons for non-participation were Lack of time (n = 71, 34%) followed by Not interested in participation (n = 63, 30%). On a patient level, N = 102 PwD were successfully recruited. On average, each GP referred about n = 7 PwD (range: 1–17; mdn = 6; IQR = 3.5) and successfully recruited about n = 4 PwD (range: 1–11; mdn = 3; IQR = 3.5). Conclusion First, our findings propose GP research networks as a promising strategy to promote recruitment and participation of GPs and their patients in research. Second, present findings highlight the importance of including GPs and their interests in specific research topics in early stages of research in order to ensure a successful recruitment. Finally, results do not support cold calls as a successful strategy in the recruitment of GPs. Trial registration The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry (Trial registration number: ISRCTN15854413). Registered 01 April 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Lech
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Julie L O'Sullivan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Leonard Wellmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Juliana Supplieth
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Döpfmer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of General Practice, Berlin, Germany
| | - Paul Gellert
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Adelheid Kuhlmey
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johanna Nordheim
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Medical Sociology and Rehabilitation Science, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ferrell B, Williams AC, Borneman T, Chung V, Smith TJ. Clinical Trials: Understanding Patient Perspectives and Beliefs About Treatment. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 23:592-598. [PMID: 31730601 DOI: 10.1188/19.cjon.592-598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the experiences of patients with solid tumors who are in phase 1 clinical trials can help nurses to provide optimal care. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this article is to describe patient perspectives of participating in a phase 1 trial and understanding their disease status and treatment options. In addition, the authors describe the impact of the disease and clinical trial participation on quality of life. METHODS 30 patients were interviewed and audio recorded; the interviews were transcribed and content analysis methods were used to identify common themes. FINDINGS Patients reported participating in the phase 1 clinical trial because their doctors informed and encouraged them, they had no other treatment options if they wanted to live longer, or they wanted to help future patients with cancer. Most believed that participation would improve or stabilize their illness and quality of life. They believed that, when the clinical trial ended, there would be new treatments. Participants reported that healthcare providers and family members provided support, and that compassion, cultural awareness, spiritual support, and the need for individual attention were important.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ohsumi S, Mukai H, Takahashi M, Hozumi Y, Akabane H, Park Y, Tokunaga E, Takashima T, Watanabe T, Sagara Y, Kaneko T, Ohashi Y. Factors affecting enrollment in randomized controlled trials conducted for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:873-881. [PMID: 32463090 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is critical to obtain informed consent from eligible patients to complete clinical trials. We investigated the factors that affect the participation rates of eligible patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with metastatic breast cancer who were eligible for SELECT BC or SELECT BC-CONFIRM trials, randomized controlled trials conducted for patients with chemotherapy-naive metastatic breast cancer were recruited to prospective studies, SELECT BC-FEEL and SELECT BC-FEEL II, respectively. SELECT BC FEEL and SELECT BC-FEEL II were conducted to identify the factors affecting the rates at which informed consent was obtained, using a self-administered questionnaire we developed. RESULTS In total, 232 patients participated in the studies. The patients who agreed to take part in the randomized trials were more likely than the refusers to answer that they decided to participate because: 'My doctor wanted me to participate in this trial' (P = 0.00000), ' My family or friends wanted me to participate in this trial' (P = 0.00000), 'Both treatment regimens used in the trial are suitable to me' (P = 0.00383), 'I know that the trial is conducted to determine which is a better treatment' (P = 0.01196), and ' I think that my participation in the trial will contribute to the benefit to future patients with the same disease' (P = 0.00756). CONCLUSIONS To enhance the consent rate in randomized trials of metastatic breast cancer patients, concepts of the trials must be considered important and acceptable not only by patients but also by doctors and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shozo Ohsumi
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou, Minami-umemoto-machi, Matsuyama 791-0280, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Mukai
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa
| | - Masato Takahashi
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo
| | - Yasuo Hozumi
- Department of Breast Surgery, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Kasama
| | | | - Youngjin Park
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai
| | - Eriko Tokunaga
- Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka
| | - Tsutomu Takashima
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka
| | - Takanori Watanabe
- Department of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai
| | - Yoshiaki Sagara
- Department of Breast Oncology, Hakuaikai Medical Corp Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima
| | - Tetsuji Kaneko
- Department of Clinical Research, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Fuchu
| | - Yasuo Ohashi
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Chuo University, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Renovanz M, Hippler M, Voss M, Wehinger J, Keßler AF, Gempt J, Nadji-Ohl M, Weiß Lucas C, Rapp M, Misch M, Coburger J, Mehlitz M, Meixensberger J, Keric N, Tabatabai G, Blettner M, Schranz M, Singer S. Glioma patients in outpatient care-optimization of psychosocial care in neuro-oncological patients (GLIOPT): Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 2020; 21:434. [PMID: 32460811 PMCID: PMC7251889 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04321-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with high-grade gliomas (HGG) often suffer from high distress and require psychosocial support. However, due to neurological and neurocognitive deficits, adequate assessment of distress and support needs remains challenging in clinical practice. The objective of the present study is to investigate whether a systematic implementation of signaling questions into the routine outpatient consultation will be helpful to bridge this gap. Methods/design This is a multicenter cluster randomized study with two arms. Randomization is done on a cluster level with 13 hospitals providing regular neuro-oncological outpatient services conducted by neurologists and/or neurosurgeons. The intervention will include an assessment of psychosocial distress of patients in doctor–patient conversation compared to assessment of psychosocial distress via questionnaire (control, standard of care). In total, 616 HGG patients will be enrolled. The outcome will be the number of HGG patients with increased psychosocial distress who receive professional support from psychosocial services. Secondary endpoints are inter alia number of patients reporting psychosocial distress and unmet needs detected correctly by the respective method; quality of life; psychological well-being and burden of the patients before and after doctor–patient consultation; as well as the length of the doctor–patient consultation. Discussion Patients with HGG are confronted with an oncological diagnosis and at the same time with high symptom burden. This often leads to distress, which is not always adequately recognized and treated. So far, only a limited number of adequate instruments are available to assess HGG patient’s distress. Yet, an adequate care and support network might facilitate the course of the disease and tumor therapies for patients. Our hypothesis is that an assessment conducted directly by attending doctors and in which the doctors talk to patients with HGG will be more effective than an assessment via a questionnaire, leading to better identifying patients in need of support. This may lead to an improvement of health care in these patients. Further, this method might be implemented also in other brain tumor patients (e.g., patients with brain metastases). Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS00018079. Registered on 3rd September 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. .,Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Melina Hippler
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Martin Voss
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens Wehinger
- Department of Neurology, Clinic Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Almuth F Keßler
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Jens Gempt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Minou Nadji-Ohl
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital (KH), Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Carolin Weiß Lucas
- Center for Neurosurgery, University Hospital Cologne, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - Marion Rapp
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Misch
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité - University Medical Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan Coburger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Marcus Mehlitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Barmherzige Brueder Trier, Trier, Germany
| | | | - Naureen Keric
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Ghazaleh Tabatabai
- Department of Neurology & Interdisciplinary Neuro-Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Center for Neuro-Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen-Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria Blettner
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Melanie Schranz
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hassanzadeh H, Karimi S, Nguyen A. Matching patients to clinical trials using semantically enriched document representation. J Biomed Inform 2020; 105:103406. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
26
|
Gayet-Ageron A, Rudaz S, Perneger T. Study design factors influencing patients' willingness to participate in clinical research: a randomised vignette-based study. BMC Med Res Methodol 2020; 20:93. [PMID: 32336266 PMCID: PMC7183682 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-00979-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background High patient participation in clinical research reduces selection bias and ensures the generalizability of study findings. We explored study-related factors that may influence patients’ willingness to participate in research. Methods We submitted by mail two vignettes that described clinical research studies – a drug trial and a diagnostic study – to patients recently discharged from hospital and assessed their willingness to participate. We used a factorial design to randomly allocate three study attributes per vignette: in the drug trial, presumed superiority of new drug versus equipoise, public versus industry funding, and random versus non-random treatment allocation; in the diagnostic study, common versus rare disease, genetic versus protein analysis, and automatic reporting of results versus reporting on request. Results Of 2600 patients contacted, 1140 (44%) participated. Globally, willingness to participate in a drug trial was lower than in a diagnostic study (44.8% vs. 76.2%; P < 0.001). In the drug trial, participation was significantly higher when the new drug was presented as presumably better than the old (vs. equipoise) and when the study was funded by public sources (vs. industry), but was not affected by the allocation method. None of the factors tested in the diagnostic study was associated with participation. Conclusions Patients were more likely to participate in a hypothetical observational diagnostic study than in a hypothetical drug trial. Participation in the trial was lower when clinical equipoise was expressed and when the trial was funded by industry. These results suggest that some features of study design can influence participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angèle Gayet-Ageron
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Department of health and community medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 6 Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211, 14, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Sandrine Rudaz
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Department of health and community medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 6 Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211, 14, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Perneger
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Department of health and community medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, 6 Rue Gabrielle Perret-Gentil, 1211, 14, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Satisfaction and perceptions of research participants in clinical and translational studies: An urban multi-institution with CTSA. J Clin Transl Sci 2020; 4:317-322. [PMID: 33244412 PMCID: PMC7681123 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2020.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To examine research participants’ levels of satisfaction and perceptions and aid researchers to better engage research volunteers from all racial and ethnic populations in clinical trials. A participant satisfaction survey was developed that focused on three domains to reflect satisfaction with delivery of care, environment, and center operations. In addition, the survey contained open-ended questions to reflect overall experiences and perceptions. Two hundred and seventy-eight participants (55% African American and 29% non-Hispanic Whites) with an average age of 52 years completed the survey. Results: The results indicated that the majority of the participants rated their satisfaction very highly across all domains. Ninety percent stated they were very satisfied/satisfied or very strongly agreed/agreed in the three domains. Obtaining high-quality care/access to health care professionals (60%), learning more about their illness/disease (60%), and helping others (57%) were noted as important factors in choosing to participate in a trial. Regarding overall experience, majority of respondents stated that friendliness, expertise of staff, learning more about their disease, and contributing to science were important. Further, financial compensation was not a primary motivation for participation. A majority of participants stated that they would participate in future studies and would recommend a friend or a family member to participate in clinical trials. Conclusions: The findings indicate that the degree of satisfaction with the research staff and with the specific trial itself are important determinants for enrolling, completing a study, and for participating in future trials.
Collapse
|
28
|
Kalavar M, Al-Khersan H, Sridhar J, Gorniak RJ, Lakhani PC, Flanders AE, Kuriyan AE. Applications of Artificial Intelligence for the Detection, Management, and Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2020; 60:127-145. [PMID: 33093322 PMCID: PMC8514105 DOI: 10.1097/iio.0000000000000333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Rates of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic macular edema (DME), a common ocular complication of diabetes mellitus, are increasing worldwide. There is a substantial burden concerning the detection and management of this condition, particularly in low-resource settings, due to limitations such as the time, cost, and labor associated with current screening and treatment methods. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a modality of pattern recognition that has the potential to combat these limitations in a reliable and cost-effective way. This review explores the various applications of AI on the screening, management, and treatment of DR and DME. AI applications for detecting referable DR and DME have been the most thoroughly researched applications for this condition. While some studies exist using AI to stratify DR patients based on the risk of progression, predict treatment outcomes to anti-VEGF therapy, and explore the utilization of AI for clinical trials to develop new treatments for DR, further validation studies on larger datasets are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meghana Kalavar
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Hasenin Al-Khersan
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Jayanth Sridhar
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | | - Paras C. Lakhani
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam E. Flanders
- Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ajay E. Kuriyan
- Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, PA
- The Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ecarnot F, Meunier-Beillard N, Quenot JP, Meneveau N. Factors associated with refusal or acceptance of older patients (≥ 65 years) to provide consent to participate in clinical research in cardiology: a qualitative study. Aging Clin Exp Res 2020; 32:133-140. [PMID: 30903598 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-019-01172-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical research is an essential step in the successful translation of knowledge from basic research into concrete clinical applications, yet many people are reluctant to provide consent when actually approached to actively participate in clinical trials. AIMS We investigated the factors that influence older patient's (≥ 65 years) decisions to accept or refuse to participate in a prospective randomized clinical trial in secondary prevention after acute coronary syndrome. METHODS Qualitative approach based on individual semi-structured interviews with patients who were approached for consent to participate in a currently ongoing clinical trial was adopted. Patients were interviewed after the consent process (8 accepted; 8 refused the trial). Interviews were analysed using grounded theory methodology. RESULTS Sixteen patients aged ≥ 65 years participated. The main concept to emerge from these interviews is that the actual trial itself does not appear to be the primary determinant in the decision to participate in clinical research. Rather, patients' decisions to participate (or not) in clinical research appear to be primarily determined by their capacity to deal with the current health event that has disrupted their life, and by their available mental and physical resources. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Older patients display varying levels of engagement in their own health, ranging from low engagement with high trust in the medical profession, to high engagement mirrored by distrust of the medical profession. Structural conditions, such as personal benefit from trial participation, or logistic barriers to participation, seem to affect both accepters and refusers in the same manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Ecarnot
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, EA3920, University of Franche-Comté, 3 Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France.
| | - Nicolas Meunier-Beillard
- Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche - Délégation à la Recherche Clinique et à l'Innovation, François Mitterand University Hospital, Dijon, France
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, Dijon, France
- INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Quenot
- Department of Intensive Care, François Mitterrand University Hospital, 14 rue Paul Gaffarel, Dijon, France
- INSERM CIC 1432, Clinical Epidemiology, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
- Lipness Team, INSERM Research Center LNC-UMR1231 and LabExLipSTIC, University of Burgundy, Dijon, France
| | - Nicolas Meneveau
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Jean Minjoz, EA3920, University of Franche-Comté, 3 Boulevard Fleming, 25000, Besançon, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pawson R. The "pragmatic trial": An essentially contested concept? J Eval Clin Pract 2019; 25:943-954. [PMID: 31313412 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
For over 50 years, clinical research methodology has wrestled with the problem of the lack of correspondence between tests of treatments and applications of treatments. The former comprise of trials featuring scrupulous control of patient eligibility, treatment compliance, clinician expertise, follow-up intensity, and so on. In applying a validated treatment, the practitioner has to confront considerable real-world variation in potential patients and in implementation regimes. The remedy, going by the name of "pragmatic trials," is to conduct clinical trials in conditions corresponding more closely to everyday practice. This solution has proved easier to utter than to execute, and the paper reviews the extensive literature on pragmatic trials, seeking to assess whether it has terminated in clarity or contestation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray Pawson
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lindenberg MA, Retèl VP, van den Berg JH, Geukes Foppen MH, Haanen JB, van Harten WH. Treatment With Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Advanced Melanoma: Evaluation of Early Clinical Implementation of an Advanced Therapy Medicinal Product. J Immunother 2019; 41:413-425. [PMID: 30300260 PMCID: PMC6200372 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL)-therapy in advanced melanoma is an advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) which, despite promising results, has not been implemented widely. In a European setting, TIL-therapy has been in use since 2011 and is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. As clinical implementation of ATMPs is challenging, this study aims to evaluate early application of TIL-therapy, through the application of a constructive technology assessment (CTA). First the literature on ATMP barriers and facilitators in clinical translation was summarized. Subsequently, application of TIL-therapy was evaluated through semistructured interviews with 26 stakeholders according to 6 CTA domains: clinical, economic, patient-related, organizational, technical, and future. In addition, treatment costs were estimated. A number of barriers to clinical translation were identified in the literature, including: inadequate financial support, lack of regulatory knowledge, risks in using live tissues, and the complex path to market approval. Innovative reimbursement procedures could particularly facilitate translation. The CTA survey of TIL-therapy acknowledged these barriers, and revealed the following facilitators: the expected effectiveness resulting in institutional support for an internal pilot, the results of which led to the inclusion of TIL-therapy in a national coverage with evidence development program, the availability of an in-house pharmacist, quality assurance expertise and a TIL-skilled technician. Institutional and national implementation of TIL-therapy remains complex. The promising clinical effectiveness is expected to facilitate the adoption of TIL-therapy, especially when validated through a randomized controlled trial. Innovative and conditional reimbursement procedures, together with the organization of knowledge transfer, could support and improve clinical translation of TIL and ATMPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie A. Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Valesca P. Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marnix H. Geukes Foppen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - John B. Haanen
- Division of Molecular Oncology and Immunology
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute—Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - Wim H. van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology
- Department of Health Technology and Services research, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Goldman V, Dushkin A, Wexler DJ, Chang Y, Porneala B, Bissett L, McCarthy J, Rodriguez A, Chase B, LaRocca R, Wheeler A, Delahanty LM. Effective recruitment for practice-based research: Lessons from the REAL HEALTH-Diabetes Study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019; 15:100374. [PMID: 31193095 PMCID: PMC6517530 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aims: The REAL HEALTH Diabetes Study is a practice-based randomized clinical trial that compares the effectiveness of lifestyle intervention aimed at weight reduction to medical nutrition therapy in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. This paper describes a tiered approach to recruitment, the resultant enrollment rates of sequentially more intensive recruitment strategies, and identifies barriers to participation. Methods Potential participants were identified using patient health registries and classified by recruitment site. Four recruitment strategies were used to achieve target enrollment: (1) mail/telephone outreach; (2) direct referral from providers; (3) orientation sessions; and (4) media/advertising. Reasons for ineligibility and non-participation were tracked. Results Fifteen thousand two hundred sixty-nine (15,269) potential participants were identified from all sources, with the clear majority coming from patient registries. Mail/telephone outreach alone had the lowest enrollment rate (1.2%). Direct referral and orientation sessions superimposed on mail/telephone outreach was used for fewer participants but had greater enrollment rates (27% and 52%.) Media/advertising was ineffective. The most commonly reported reasons for non-participation were not wanting to be in a research (30%) or a weight loss program (22%); time commitment (20%); and distance/transportation (14%). Conclusions The use of population registries to identify potential participants coupled with successively more intensive recruitment strategies, executed in a tiered approach moving toward personal engagement to establish trust and credibility, maximized recruitment enrollment rates. Our findings regarding facilitators and barriers to recruitment could be used to inform other practice-based research or to engage patients in group interventions in usual care settings. Clinical trial registration NCT02320253.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie Goldman
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Dushkin
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Deborah J Wexler
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yuchiao Chang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bianca Porneala
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laurie Bissett
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeanna McCarthy
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anthony Rodriguez
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Barbara Chase
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,MGH Chelsea Health Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rajani LaRocca
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,MGH Charlestown Health Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amy Wheeler
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,MGH Revere Health Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Linda M Delahanty
- Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Diabetes Research Center, MGH Diabetes Unit, Department of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Nielsen ZE, Berthelsen CB. Cancer patients' perceptions of factors influencing their decisions on participation in clinical drug trials: A qualitative meta-synthesis. J Clin Nurs 2019; 28:2443-2461. [PMID: 30673153 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To examine cancer patients' perceptions of factors that may influence their decisions on participating in phase I-III clinical drug trials. BACKGROUND The number of cancer participants in clinical drug trials has increased rapidly in Denmark in recent years. The rights, safety and well-being of patients considering participation are protected by the international, ethical and scientific principles. A meta-synthesis was conducted to enable health professionals to support cancer patients who are considering trial participation in accordance with the above principles. DESIGN Meta-synthesis. METHODS A qualitative meta-synthesis, as described by Sandelowski and Barroso, was conducted based on a literature search in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Nine reports were found eligible and were included. The PRISMA checklist was used. RESULTS A framework was developed, and patients' perceptions of the factors influencing their decisions were identified, namely patients' perceptions of their relatives, the physician, the hope of therapeutic benefit, altruism, having other options and living with cancer. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that cancer patients' decisions on participation in clinical drug trials are influenced by their perceptions of trust towards the physician, their relatives' attitudes and the consequences participation might have for their families. Patients are motivated to participate due to the hope of therapeutic benefit and for altruistic reasons. The factors influencing their decisions to participate include a cost-benefit consideration, which in turn may be subject to the patient's perception of having other options available besides participation. This may be related to the patient's attitude towards living with cancer, and the decision can be a way of trying to cope with the psychological aspects of living with cancer. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE The results of this meta-synthesis offer insight into patients' perceptions of what may influence their decisions, and they enable health professionals to support patients making such decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zandra Engelbak Nielsen
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fadda M, Jobin A, Blasimme A, Greshake Tzovaras B, Price Ball M, Vayena E. User Perspectives of a Web-Based Data-Sharing Platform (Open Humans) on Ethical Oversight in Participant-Led Research: Protocol for a Quantitative Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2018; 7:e10939. [PMID: 30487120 PMCID: PMC6291678 DOI: 10.2196/10939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 07/10/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in medicine rely to a great extent on people's willingness to share their data with researchers. With increasingly widespread use of digital technologies, several Web-based communities have emerged aiming to enable their users to share large amounts of data, some of which can possibly be employed for research purposes by scientists, or to conduct participant-led research (PLR). Scholarship has recently addressed the necessity of interrogating how existing ethical standards can and should be applied and adapted in view of the specificities of such Web-based activities. So far, no study has explored participants' beliefs about and attitudes toward ethical oversight when it comes to platforms that involve medical data sharing. OBJECTIVE This paper presents the protocol for a survey study aimed at understanding users' beliefs about Web-based data-sharing platforms regarding how research ethics principles should be applied in such a setting. Furthermore, the study aims at quantitatively assessing the relationship between participants' perspectives on ethical oversight and other variables such as previous participation in research, beliefs about data sharing, and attitudes toward self-experimentation. METHODS We are conducting a Web-based survey with users of a popular Web-based data-sharing platform, Open Humans. The survey has been sent to approximately 4640 users registered for the Open Humans newsletter. To fill out the survey, participants need to have an account on Open Humans. We expect a 5%-10% response rate (between 200 and 400 completed surveys out of approximately 4000 survey invitations sent). Independent variables include past data-sharing behavior and intention, beliefs about data sharing, past participation in research, attitudes toward self-experimentation, perceived knowledge of the platform's guidelines and terms, perceived importance of having transparent guidelines, and governance-related beliefs. The main dependent variable is participants' expectations regarding who should ensure that ethical requirements are met within research projects conducted on open data-sharing platforms, based on Emanuel et al's ethical framework. We will use chi-square tests to assess the relationship between participants' expectations regarding ethical oversight and their past behavior, future intentions, beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge. RESULTS Data collection started on June 13, 2018. A reminder to fill out the survey was sent to participants in mid-July. We expect to gain insights on users' perspectives on the ethical oversight of Web-based data-sharing platforms and on the associated experiences, beliefs, and sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSIONS When digital tools allow people to engage in PLR including medical data, understanding how people interpret and envision the ethical oversight of their data-sharing practices is crucial. This will be the first study to explore users' perspectives on ethical oversight of Web-based data-sharing platforms. The results will help inform the development of a framework that can be employed for platforms hosting various kinds of research projects to accommodate participants' ethical oversight needs. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/10939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Fadda
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anna Jobin
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Bastian Greshake Tzovaras
- Open Humans Foundation, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | | | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Forcina V, Vakeesan B, Paulo C, Mitchell L, Bell JA, Tam S, Wang K, Gupta AA, Lewin J. Perceptions and attitudes toward clinical trials in adolescent and young adults with cancer: a systematic review. ADOLESCENT HEALTH MEDICINE AND THERAPEUTICS 2018; 9:87-94. [PMID: 29942170 PMCID: PMC6005317 DOI: 10.2147/ahmt.s163121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Although cancer clinical trials (CT) offer opportunities for novel treatments that may lead to improved outcomes, adolescents and young adults (AYA) are less likely to participate in these trials as compared to younger children and older adults. We aimed to identify the perceptions and attitudes toward CT in AYA that influence trial participation. Materials and methods A systematic review of cancer literature was conducted that assessed perceptions and attitudes toward CT enrollment limited to AYA patients (defined as age 15–39). We estimated the frequency of identified themes by pooling identified studies. Results In total, six original research articles were identified that specifically addressed perceptions or attitudes that influenced CT participation in AYA patients. Three studies were conducted at pediatric centers – one at an AYA unit, one at an adult cancer hospital, and one was registry based. Major themes identified for CT acceptability included: hope for positive clinical affect, altruism, and having autonomy. Potential deterrents included: prolonged hospitalization, worry of side effects, and discomfort with experimentation. Conclusion Limited information is available with regard to the perceptions and attitudes toward CT acceptability among AYA patients, especially those treated at adult cancer centers, which prevents generalization of data and themes. Future research assessing strategies for understanding and supporting CT decision-making processes among AYA represents a key focus for future funding to improve CT enrollment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Forcina
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Branavan Vakeesan
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chelsea Paulo
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Mitchell
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Ah Bell
- Joint Center for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seline Tam
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kate Wang
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Abha A Gupta
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeremy Lewin
- Adolescent and Young Adult Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,ONTrac, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Fan Y, Zhang H, Yang G, Wu C, Guo Y, Ling C. China’s cancer patients’ perceptions, attitudes and participation in clinical trials of complementary and alternative medicine: A multi-center cross-sectional study. Eur J Integr Med 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2018.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
37
|
Glasbey JC, Magill EL, Brock K, Bach SP. Recommendations for Randomised Trials in Surgical Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 29:799-810. [PMID: 29097072 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2017] [Accepted: 09/20/2017] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Trials of surgical procedures in the treatment of malignant disease face a unique set of challenges. This review aimed to describe recommendations for the design, delivery and reporting of randomised trials in surgical oncology. A literature search was carried out without date limits to identify articles related to trial methodology research in surgery and surgical oncology. A narrative review was framed around two open National Institute of Health Research portfolio trials in colon and rectal cancer: the STAR-TREC trial (ISRCTN14240288) and the ROCCS trial (ISRCTN46330337). Twelve specific challenges were highlighted: standardisation of technique; pilot and feasibility studies; balancing treatments; the recruitment pathway; outcome measures; patient and public representation; trainee-led networks; randomisation; novel techniques and training; learning curves; blinding; follow-up. Evidence-based recommendations were made for the future design and conduct of surgical oncology trials. Better understanding of the challenges facing trials in the surgical treatment of cancer will accelerate high-quality evaluation and rapid adoption of innovation for the benefit of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Glasbey
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - E L Magill
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - K Brock
- Devices, Drugs, Diagnostics and Biomarkers (D3B), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - S P Bach
- Academic Department of Surgery, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Devices, Drugs, Diagnostics and Biomarkers (D3B), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Renovanz M, Hechtner M, Kohlmann K, Janko M, Nadji-Ohl M, Singer S, Ringel F, Coburger J, Hickmann AK. Compliance with patient-reported outcome assessment in glioma patients: predictors for drop out. Neurooncol Pract 2017; 5:129-138. [PMID: 31385978 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npx026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcomes are of high importance in clinical neuro-oncology. However, assessment is still suboptimal. We aimed at exploring factors associated with the probability for a) drop out of study and b) death during follow-up. Methods Patients were assessed twice during follow-up visits scheduled within 3 to 5 months of each other by using 3 validated patient-reported outcome measures (t1: first assessment, t2: second assessment). As "death" was seen as a competing risk for drop out, univariate competing risk Cox regression models were applied to explore factors associated with dropping out (age, gender, WHO grade, living situation, recurrent surgery, Karnofsky Performance Status, time since diagnosis, and patient-reported outcomes assessed by Distress Thermometer, EORTC-QLQ-C30, EORTC-QLQ-BN20, and SCNS-SF-34G). Results Two hundred forty-six patients were eligible, 173 (70%) participated. Patients declining participation were diagnosed with glioblastomas more often than with other gliomas (56% vs 39%). At t2, 32 (18%) patients dropped out, n = 14 death-related, n = 18 for other reasons. Motor dysfunction (EORTC-QLQ-BN20) was associated with higher risk for non-death-related drop out (HR: 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.03; P = .03). Death-related drop out was associated with age (HR: 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.14; P = .002), Karnofsky Performance Status (HR: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96; P < .001), lower physical functioning (EORTC-QLQ-C30; HR: 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.00; P = .04) and lower motor functioning (EORTC-QLQ-BN20; HR: 1.020; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .02). Conclusion Patients with motor dysfunction and poorer clinical condition seem to be more likely to drop out of studies applying patient-reported outcome measures. This should be taken into account when planning studies assessing glioma patients and for interpretation of results of patient-reported outcome assessments in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjam Renovanz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Marlene Hechtner
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Karoline Kohlmann
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Mareile Janko
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Minou Nadji-Ohl
- Department of Neurosurgery Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart Germany
| | - Susanne Singer
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Florian Ringel
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz Germany
| | - Jan Coburger
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Ulm/Günzburg, Günzburg Germany
| | - Anne-Katrin Hickmann
- Department of Neurosurgery Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery Hirslanden Klinikum, Luzern Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Morgan SE, Occa A, Mouton A, Potter J. The Role of Nonverbal Communication Behaviors in Clinical Trial and Research Study Recruitment. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2017; 32:461-469. [PMID: 27314155 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2016.1140266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Few studies have examined the communication behaviors of those who recruit for clinical trials and research studies, particularly of nonmedical professionals who often do the bulk of recruiting. This focus-group study of 63 recruiters analyzes the ways in which nonverbal communication behaviors support the process of recruitment, using the lens of communication accommodation theory. Results indicate that recruiters first "read" potential study participants' nonverbal communication for clues about their state of mind, then use nonverbal communication to achieve a sense of convergence. Specific nonverbal communication behaviors were discussed by recruiters, including smiling, variations in the use of voice, adjusting body position, the appropriate use of physical touch, the management of eye contact, and the effect of clothing and physical appearance. Implications for recruitment practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aurora Occa
- a School of Communication , University of Miami
| | - Ashton Mouton
- b Brian Lamb School of Communication , Purdue University
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Thomas KS, Batchelor JM, Bath-Hextall F, Chalmers JR, Clarke T, Crowe S, Delamere FM, Eleftheriadou V, Evans N, Firkins L, Greenlaw N, Lansbury L, Lawton S, Layfield C, Leonardi-Bee J, Mason J, Mitchell E, Nankervis H, Norrie J, Nunn A, Ormerod AD, Patel R, Perkins W, Ravenscroft JC, Schmitt J, Simpson E, Whitton ME, Williams HC. A programme of research to set priorities and reduce uncertainties for the prevention and treatment of skin disease. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar04180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundSkin diseases are very common and can have a large impact on the quality of life of patients and caregivers. This programme addressed four diseases: (1) eczema, (2) vitiligo, (3) squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) and (4) pyoderma gangrenosum (PG).ObjectiveTo set priorities and reduce uncertainties for the treatment and prevention of skin disease in our four chosen diseases.DesignMixed methods including eight systematic reviews, three prioritisation exercises, two pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs), three feasibility studies, two core outcome initiatives, four funding proposals for national RCTs and one completed national RCT.SettingSecondary care, primary care and the general population.ParticipantsPatients (and their caregivers) with eczema, vitiligo, SCC and PG, plus health-care professionals with an interest in skin disease.InterventionsOur three intervention studies included (1) barrier enhancement using emollients from birth to prevent eczema (pilot RCT); (2) handheld narrowband ultraviolet light B therapy for treating vitiligo (pilot RCT); and (3) oral ciclosporin (Neoral®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) compared with oral prednisolone for managing PG (pragmatic national RCT).ResultsSystematic reviews included two overarching systematic reviews of RCTs of treatments for eczema and vitiligo, an umbrella review of systematic reviews of interventions for the prevention of eczema, two reviews of treatments for SCC (one included RCTs and the second included observational studies), and three reviews of outcome measures and outcome reporting. Three prioritisation partnership exercises identified 26 priority areas for future research in eczema, vitiligo and SCC. Two international consensus initiatives identified four core domains for future eczema trials and seven core domains for vitiligo trials. Two pilot RCTs and three feasibility studies critically informed development of four trial proposals for external funding, three of which are now funded and one is pending consideration by funders. Our pragmatic RCT tested the two commonly used systemic treatments for PG (prednisolone vs. ciclosporin) and found no difference in their clinical effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. Both drugs showed limited benefit. Only half of the participants’ ulcers had healed by 6 months. For those with healed ulcers, recurrence was common (30%). Different side effect profiles were noted for each drug, which can inform clinical decisions on an individual patient basis. Three researchers were trained to PhD level and a dermatology patient panel was established to ensure patient involvement in all aspects of the programme.ConclusionsFindings from this programme of work have already informed clinical guidelines and patient information resources. Feasibility studies have ensured that large national pragmatic trials will now be conducted on important areas of treatment uncertainty that address the needs of patients and the NHS. There is scope for considerable improvement in terms of trial design, conduct and reporting for RCTs of skin disease, which can be improved through wider collaboration, registration of trial protocols and complete reporting and international consensus over core outcome sets. Three national trials have now been funded as a result of this work. Two international initiatives to establish how best to measure the core outcome domains for eczema and vitiligo are ongoing.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials Barrier Enhancement for Eczema Prevention (BEEP) (ISRCTN84854178 and NCT01142999), Study of Treatments fOr Pyoderma GAngrenosum Patients (STOP GAP) (ISRCTN35898459) and Hand Held NB-UVB for Early or Focal Vitiligo at Home (HI-Light Pilot Trial) (NCT01478945).FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full inProgramme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 4, No. 18. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | | - Joanne R Chalmers
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tessa Clarke
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Finola M Delamere
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | | - Nicholas Evans
- Trust Headquarters, West Hertfordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Hemel Hempstead, UK
| | - Lester Firkins
- Strategy and Development Group, James Lind Alliance, Oxford, UK
| | - Nicola Greenlaw
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Louise Lansbury
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Sandra Lawton
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Carron Layfield
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jo Leonardi-Bee
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - James Mason
- School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Eleanor Mitchell
- Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Helen Nankervis
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Norrie
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Andrew Nunn
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ramesh Patel
- Radcliffe-on-Trent Health Centre, Nottingham, UK
| | - William Perkins
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jane C Ravenscroft
- Dermatology Department, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jochen Schmitt
- Centre for Evidence-based Healthcare, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Eric Simpson
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Maxine E Whitton
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Atar S. Additional clinical benefit independent of study result or trial arm allocation to participants in multi-center randomized controlled trials. Eur J Intern Med 2016; 36:e24-e25. [PMID: 27601285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shaul Atar
- Department of Cardiology, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, affiliated with the Faculty of Medicine in the Galilee, Bar Ilan University, Safed, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Satalkar P, Elger B, Shaw D. Stakeholder views on participant selection for first-in-human trials in cancer nanomedicine. Curr Oncol 2016; 23:e530-e537. [PMID: 28050141 PMCID: PMC5176378 DOI: 10.3747/co.23.3214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participant selection for first-in-human (fih) trials involves complex decisions. The trial design makes it unlikely that participants will receive clinically relevant therapeutic benefit, but they are likely to experience risks of various magnitudes and types. The aim of the present paper was to describe and discuss the views of investigators and ethics committee members about the choice of trial participants for fih trials in cancer nanomedicine. METHODS We drew insights from an exploratory qualitative study involving thematic analysis of 46 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders in Europe and North America involved in fih nanomedicine trials. The present work draws on subset of 21 interviews with investigators and ethics committee members who have either conducted or reviewed a fih cancer nanomedicine trial or are planning one. RESULTS Investigators and ethics committee members are aware of the ethics standards for recruiting patients with end-stage cancer into fih trials, but they nonetheless question the practice and provide reasons against it. CONCLUSIONS Although it is a standard and ethically accepted practice to enrol patients with end-stage cancer and no treatment options into fih trials of investigational chemotherapeutic molecules, doing so can threaten the validity and generalizability of the trials, thereby weakening translational research. Another possibility is to stratify and include patients with less advanced disease who demonstrate certain biomarkers or cancer genotypes and who have a disease profile similar to that tested in preclinical studies. The latter approach could be a step toward personalized medical research and targeted drug development. Such a patient selection approach requires multi-stakeholder discussion to reach scientific and ethics consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. Satalkar
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B.S. Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - D.M. Shaw
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Blümle A, Schandelmaier S, Oeller P, Kasenda B, Briel M, von Elm E. Premature Discontinuation of Prospective Clinical Studies Approved by a Research Ethics Committee - A Comparison of Randomised and Non-Randomised Studies. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165605. [PMID: 27792749 PMCID: PMC5085068 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 10/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Premature discontinuation of clinical studies affects about 25% of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which raises concerns about waste of scarce resources for research. The risk of discontinuation of non-randomised prospective studies (NPSs) is yet unclear. Objectives To compare the proportion of discontinued studies between NPSs and RCTs that received ethical approval. Methods We systematically surveyed prospective longitudinal clinical studies that were approved by a single REC in Freiburg, Germany between 2000 and 2002. We collected study characteristics, identified subsequent publications, and surveyed investigators to elucidate whether a study was discontinued and, if so, why. Results Of 917 approved studies, 547 were prospective longitudinal studies (306 RCTs and 241 NPSs). NPSs were on average smaller than RCTs, more frequently single centre and pilot studies, and less frequently funded by industry. NPSs were less frequently discontinued than RCTs: 32/221 (14%) versus 78/288 (27%, p<0.001, missing data excluded). Poor recruitment was the most frequent reason for discontinuation in both NPSs (36%) and RCTs (37%). Conclusions Compared to RCTs, NPSs were at lower risk for discontinuation. Measures to reliably predict, sustain, and stimulate recruitment could prevent discontinuation of many RCTs but also of some NPSs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anette Blümle
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Stefan Schandelmaier
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Patrick Oeller
- Cochrane Germany, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Kasenda
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Matthias Briel
- Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erik von Elm
- Cochrane Switzerland, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (IUMSP), Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Renovanz M, Hickmann AK, Coburger J, Kohlmann K, Janko M, Reuter AK, Keric N, Nadji-Ohl M, König J, Singer S, Giese A, Hechtner M. Assessing psychological and supportive care needs in glioma patients - feasibility study on the use of the Supportive Care Needs Survey Short Form (SCNS-SF34-G) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey Screening Tool (SCNS-ST9) in clinical practice. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2016; 27. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M. Renovanz
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - A.-K. Hickmann
- Center for Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery; Hirslanden; Zürich Switzerland
- Department of Neurosurgery Klinikum Stuttgart; Katharinenhospital; Stuttgart Germany
| | - J. Coburger
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Ulm/Günzburg Germany
| | - K. Kohlmann
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - M. Janko
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - A.-K. Reuter
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - N. Keric
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - M. Nadji-Ohl
- Department of Neurosurgery Klinikum Stuttgart; Katharinenhospital; Stuttgart Germany
| | - J. König
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research; Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - S. Singer
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research; Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); Mainz Germany
| | - A. Giese
- Department of Neurosurgery; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
| | - M. Hechtner
- Division of Epidemiology and Health Services Research; Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics; University Medical Center; Johannes-Gutenberg-University; Mainz Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK); Mainz Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ); Heidelberg Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Young L, Hertzog M, Barnason S. Effects of a home-based activation intervention on self-management adherence and readmission in rural heart failure patients: the PATCH randomized controlled trial. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2016; 16:176. [PMID: 27608624 PMCID: PMC5016888 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-016-0339-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2016] [Accepted: 07/06/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heart failure (HF) patients discharged from rural hospitals have higher 30-day readmission rates. Self-management (SM) reduces readmissions, but adherence to SM guidelines is low in the rural HF population. We tested a home-based intervention to enhance patient activation and lead to improved SM adherence. METHODS In this two-group, repeated measures randomized control trial, the main outcomes were patient reported and clinical outcomes associated with SM adherence, and all-cause readmission at 30, 90 and 180 days. RESULTS The study included 100 HF patients discharged from a rural critical access hospital. The intervention group received a 12-week SM training and coaching program delivered by telephone and tailored on subjects' activation levels. At α = .10, the PATCH intervention showed significantly greater improvement compared to usual care in patient-reported SM adherence: weighing themselves, following a low-sodium diet, taking prescribed medication, and exercising daily (all p < .0005) at 3 and 6 months after discharge. In contrast, groups did not differ in physical activity assessed by actigraphy or in clinical biomarkers. Contrary to expectation, the 30-day readmission rate was significantly higher (p = .088) in the intervention group (19.6 %) than in the control group (6.1 %), with no differences at 90 or 180 days. CONCLUSION It is feasible to conduct a randomized controlled trial in HF patients discharged from rural critical access hospitals. Significantly higher patient-reported SM adherence was not accompanied by lower clinical biomarkers or readmission rates. Further research is needed to understand mechanisms that influence outcomes and healthcare utilization in this population. TRIAL REGISTRATION CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01964053 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lufei Young
- Department of Physiological and Technological Nursing, College of Nursing Augusta University, 987 St. Sebastian Way, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.
| | - Melody Hertzog
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Susan Barnason
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Nursing, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Bidad N, MacDonald L, Winters ZE, Edwards SJL, Emson M, Griffin CL, Bliss J, Horne R. How informed is declared altruism in clinical trials? A qualitative interview study of patient decision-making about the QUEST trials (Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction). Trials 2016; 17:431. [PMID: 27590594 PMCID: PMC5009536 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1550-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) often fail to recruit sufficient participants, despite altruism being cited as their motivation. Previous investigations of factors influencing participation decisions have been methodologically limited. This study evaluated how women weigh up different motivations after initially expressing altruism, and explored their understanding of a trial and its alternatives. The trial was the 'Quality of Life after Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction' (QUEST) trial. METHODS Thirty-nine women participated in qualitative interviews 1 month post-surgery. Twenty-seven women (10 trial decliners and 17 acceptors) who spontaneously mentioned 'altruism' were selected for thematic analysis. Verbatim transcripts were coded independently by two researchers. Participants' motivations to accept or decline randomisation were cross-referenced with their understanding of the QUEST trials and the process of randomisation. RESULTS The seven emerging themes were: (1) altruism expressed by acceptors and decliners; (2) overriding personal needs in decliners; (3) pure altruism in acceptors; (4) 'hypothetical altruism' amongst acceptors; (5) weak altruism amongst acceptors; (6) conditional altruism amongst acceptors; and (7) sense of duty to participate. Poor understanding of the trial rationale and its implications was also evident. CONCLUSIONS Altruism was a motivating factor for participation in the QUEST randomised controlled trials where the main outcomes comprised quality of life and allocated treatments comprised established surgical procedures. Women's decisions were influenced by their understanding of the trial. Both acceptors and decliners of the trial expressed 'altruism', but most acceptors lacked an obvious treatment preference, hoped for personal benefits regarding a treatment allocation, or did not articulate complete understanding of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION QUEST A, ISRCTN38846532 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010. QUEST B, ISRCTN92581226 ; Date assigned 6 January 2010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Bidad
- Department of Practice and Policy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP UK
| | - Lindsay MacDonald
- Department of Practice and Policy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP UK
| | - Zoë E. Winters
- Breast Cancer Surgery Clinical and Patient Reported Outcomes Research, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Level 2 Learning and Research, Southmead Hospital, Bristol, BS10 5NB UK
| | - Sarah J. L. Edwards
- Centre for Health Humanities, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Marie Emson
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), London, SM2 5NG UK
| | - Clare L. Griffin
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), London, SM2 5NG UK
| | - Judith Bliss
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), London, SM2 5NG UK
| | - Rob Horne
- Department of Practice and Policy, Centre for Behavioural Medicine, School of Pharmacy, UCL School of Pharmacy, Mezzanine Floor, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abrahams K, Harty M, St Louis KO, Thabane L, Kathard H. Primary school teachers' opinions and attitudes towards stuttering in two South African urban education districts. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2016; 63:e1-e10. [PMID: 27796099 PMCID: PMC5843230 DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 07/06/2016] [Accepted: 05/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As teachers form an important part of the intervention process with childrenwho stutter in primary school, the primary aim was to describe primary school teachers'attitudes in South Africa. The secondary aim was to compare teachers' attitudes towardsstuttering in South Africa with those from a pooled group of respondents in the Public OpinionSurvey of Human Attributes-Stuttering (POSHA-S) database from different countries collectedin 2009-2014. METHOD A quantitative, cross-sectional survey research design was used. Primary schools intwo education districts in Western Cape, South Africa, were sampled. The POSHA-S, a selfadministeredquestionnaire, was completed by a cluster sample of 469 participants. RESULTS Overall positive attitudes towards stuttering were found, specifically related to thepotential of people who stutter, although the result should be interpreted with caution as thesample was not homogenously positive. Teachers still had misconceptions about personalitystereotypes and the cause of stuttering. The attitudes of the South African sample were slightlymore positive compared with the samples in the current POSHA-S database. CONCLUSION When developing stuttering intervention strategies, there are a number of keyconsiderations to take into account. The study provides a basis for speech-language therapiststo think about intervention with teachers and which areas of stuttering to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Abrahams
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cape Town.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Morgan SE, Mouton A, Occa A, Potter J. Clinical Trial and Research Study Recruiters' Verbal Communication Behaviors. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2016; 21:765-72. [PMID: 27259754 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1157654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
The lack of accrual to research studies and clinical trials is a persistent problem with serious consequences: Advances in medical science depend on the participation of large numbers of people, including members of minority and underserved populations. The current study examines a critical determinant of accrual: the approach of patients by professional recruiters who request participation in research studies and clinical trials. Findings indicate that recruiters use a number of verbal strategies in the communication process, including translating study information (such as simplifying, using examples, and substituting specific difficult or problematic words), using linguistic reframing or metaphors, balancing discussions of research participation risks with benefits, and encouraging potential participants to ask questions. The identification of these verbal strategies can form the basis of new communication protocols that will help medical and nonmedical professionals communicate more clearly and effectively with patients and other potential participants about research studies and clinical trials, which should lead to increased accrual in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Morgan
- a School of Communication , University of Miami , Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| | - Ashton Mouton
- b Brian Lamb School of Communication , Purdue University , West Lafayette , Indiana , USA
| | - Aurora Occa
- c School of Communication , University of Miami , Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| | - Jonell Potter
- d Miller School of Medicine , University of Miami , Coral Gables , Florida , USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Brandberg Y, Johansson H, Bergenmar M. Patients' knowledge and perceived understanding - Associations with consenting to participate in cancer clinical trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2015; 2:6-11. [PMID: 29736441 PMCID: PMC5935834 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2015.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2015] [Revised: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Recruitment to clinical trials is essential. The aims of the study were to investigate associations between patients' informed consent to participate in a cancer clinical trial and knowledge and perceived understanding of the trial. Furthermore, associations between demographic factors and consent to participate and knowledge and perceived understanding of information about the trial were studied. Methods The patients were recruited in connection to a visit at the oncology clinic for information about a drug trial. The Quality of Informed Consent questionnaire was mailed to the patients after they had decided about participation in the trial. The associations of demographic factors and "knowledge" and "perceived understanding" were analysed using linear regression models. Results A total of 125 patients were included. Higher levels of "knowledge" and "understanding" were found to be associated with consent to participate in a clinical trial, both in the univariate and multivariate analyses (p = 0.001). None of the tested demographic factors were related to consent to participate. No statistically significant associations between any of the demographic factors and knowledge or perceived understanding scores were found. Conclusion The results indicate that interventions that increase patients' knowledge and perceived understanding might improve participation rates in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Brandberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Z1:00, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Z1:00, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mia Bergenmar
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet Z1:00, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
- Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
- Corresponding author. Department of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge K53, SE-141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bowrey DJ, Baker M, Halliday V, Thomas AL, Pulikottil-Jacob R, Smith K, Morris T, Ring A. A randomised controlled trial of six weeks of home enteral nutrition versus standard care after oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy for cancer: report on a pilot and feasibility study. Trials 2015; 16:531. [PMID: 26590903 PMCID: PMC4654827 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-015-1053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Poor nutrition in the first months after oesophago-gastric resection is a contributing factor to the reduced quality of life seen in these patients. The aim of this pilot and feasibility study was to ascertain the feasibility of conducting a multi-centre randomised controlled trial to evaluate routine home enteral nutrition in these patients. Methods Patients undergoing oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy were randomised to either six weeks of home feeding through a jejunostomy (intervention), or treatment as usual (control). Intervention comprised overnight feeding, providing 50 % of energy and protein requirements, in addition to usual oral intake. Primary outcome measures were recruitment and retention rates at six weeks and six months. Nutritional intake, nutritional parameters, quality of life and healthcare costs were also collected. Interviews were conducted with a sample of participants, to ascertain patient and carer experiences. Results Fifty-four of 112 (48 %) eligible patients participated in the study over the 20 months. Study retention at six weeks was 41/54 patients (76 %) and at six months was 36/54 (67 %). At six weeks, participants in the control group had lost on average 3.9 kg more than participants in the intervention group (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.6 to 6.2). These differences remained evident at three months (mean difference 2.5 kg, 95 % CI −0.5 to 5.6) and at six months (mean difference 2.5 kg, 95 % CI −1.2 to 6.1). The mean values observed in the intervention group for mid arm circumference, mid arm muscle circumference, triceps skin fold thickness and right hand grip strength were greater than for the control group at all post hospital discharge time points. The economic evaluation suggested that it was feasible to collect resource use and EQ-5D data for a full cost-effectiveness analysis. Thematic analysis of 15 interviews identified three main themes related to the intervention and the trial: 1) a positive experience, 2) the reasons for taking part, and 3) uncertainty of the study process. Conclusions This study demonstrated that home enteral feeding by jejunostomy was feasible, safe and acceptable to patients and their carers. Whether home enteral feeding as ’usual practice’ is a cost-effective therapy would require confirmation in an appropriately powered, multi-centre study. Trial registration UK Clinical Research Network ID 12447 (main trial, first registered 30 May 2012); UK Clinical Research Network ID 13361 (qualitative substudy, first registered 30 May 2012); ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01870817 (first registered 28 May 2013)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Bowrey
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Level 6 Balmoral Building, Leicester, UK.
| | - Melanie Baker
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Level 6 Balmoral Building, Leicester, UK.
| | - Vanessa Halliday
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Anne L Thomas
- Department of Cancer Studies, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | | | - Karen Smith
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | - Tom Morris
- Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
| | - Arne Ring
- Leicester Clinical Trials Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. .,Current affiliation: Department of Mathematical Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|