1
|
Tackett S, Ng CJ, Sugarman J, Daniel EGS, Gopalan N, Tivyashinee T, Kamarulzaman A, Ali J. Defining Malaysia's health research ethics system through a stakeholder driven approach. Dev World Bioeth 2024; 24:74-83. [PMID: 36861660 PMCID: PMC10474241 DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
The need to understand the systems that support ethical health research has long been recognized, but there are limited descriptions of actual health research ethics (HRE) systems. Using participatory network mapping methods, we empirically defined Malaysia's HRE system. 13 Malaysian stakeholders identified 4 overarching and 25 specific HRE system functions and 35 actors internal and 3 external to the Malaysian HRE system responsible for those functions. Functions requiring the most attention were: advising on legislation related to HRE; optimizing research value to society; and defining standards for HRE oversight. Internal actors with the greatest potential for more influence were: the national network of research ethics committees; non-institution-based research ethics committees; and research participants. The World Health Organization, an external actor, had the largest untapped potential for influence overall. In summary, this stakeholder-driven process identified HRE system functions and actors that could be targeted to increase HRE system capacity.
Collapse
|
2
|
Kremling A, Schildmann J, Mertz M. From book to bedside? A critical perspective on the debate about "translational bioethics". Bioethics 2024; 38:177-186. [PMID: 38009318 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023]
Abstract
The concept of "translational bioethics" has received considerable attention in recent years. Most publications draw an analogy to translational medicine and describe bioethical research that aims at implementing and evaluating ethical interventions. However, current accounts of translational bioethics are often rather vague and seem to differ with regard to conceptual and methodological assumptions. It is not clear and scarcely analyzed what exactly "translation" in the field of bioethics means, in particular regarding goals and processes so that it is justified to appeal to translational medicine. In this article, we thus explore possible analogies and disanalogies between translational medicine and translational bioethics to establish whether the often occurring reference to concepts of translational medicine in the field of bioethics can be justified by substantial analogies. We will first provide an account of different models of translational medicine. In a second step, we will propose an analytic definition that explicitly articulates the essential characteristics of "translational research" irrespective of the research field (i.e., biomedicine, bioethics). Subsequently, we will explore whether and in how far general characteristics and phases of translational research in medicine can be applied to translational research in bioethics. Based on our analyses, we will come to the skeptical conclusion that at present there are considerable conceptual disanalogies and unsolved conceptual problems that disallow using "translational bioethics" in a meaningful analogy to respective accounts in biomedicine. Nevertheless, we will demonstrate that some insights gained by the conceptual accounts of translational medicine can contribute to advance current research activities in bioethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Kremling
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, Interdisciplinary Center for Health Sciences, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Marcel Mertz
- Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schuurmans J, Stalenhoef H, Bal R, Wallenburg I. All the good care: Valuation and task differentiation in older person care. Sociol Health Illn 2023; 45:1560-1577. [PMID: 37169732 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Task reallocation is increasingly foregrounded as a promising solution for capacity problems. Numerous studies show, however, that task reallocation between medical professionals is a highly contested issue and difficult to institutionalise. Conflicts are omnipresent and often arise from 'intraprofessional competition': Zero-sum games between professionals from different disciplinary backgrounds where one party's gains require another party's losses. In this article, we build on calls to enrich the sociology of professions with new concepts and theories. We analyse a case of task reallocation between medical professionals in a nursing home using concepts from empirical ethics and valuation studies. We argue that modes of good care offer a valuable framework for analysing the reorganisation of professional work because they provide an empirically grounded and fine-grained conceptual toolkit for understanding the dynamics among professionals and between professionals and managers. Enactment of different modes of good care inspires innovation in service provision but at the same time creates new tensions between those involved. We show how, in times of scarcity, a dynamic emerges between professionals attempting to stave off and reallocate work, thereby restricting their professional domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jitse Schuurmans
- Healthcare Governance, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hanna Stalenhoef
- Healthcare Governance, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Roland Bal
- Healthcare Governance, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Iris Wallenburg
- Healthcare Governance, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Virtanen MJ. Socially enacted ethics: The inner life of an ethical advisory board. Sociol Health Illn 2023; 45:1403-1420. [PMID: 37020392 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This article addresses the need to grasp the actual processing of health ethical issues in ethics organisations by analysing the work of the Finnish National Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics (ETENE). ETENE's ethics is approached ethigraphically: the advisory board enacts ethics in its social life, through its own norms and values. It is asked how this internal ethics is performed in the board practice and how ethical debate eventually becomes bounded in this practice. Based on the analysis of the board members' textual reflections and on-site observations of board meetings, ETENE's ethics appears as a tandem of a particular discussion culture and multi-perspectivity: mutual recognition and respect among board members are nurtured in the meetings, and a tactful mode of reflection is established throughout all terms of office. This shared discussion culture enables ETENE's forte-weighing multiple perspectives-by preventing asymmetries and avoiding merely technical decision-making procedures. Consequently, ETENE's ethics is not threatened by being externally bounded and formalised but is at risk of watering down endogenously, through the notable tactfulness of its discussion mode, which threatens to attenuate both substantial debate and the social shaping of board members' values in the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikko J Virtanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Linder E, Grimm H. What Is Wrong with Eating Pets? Wittgensteinian Animal Ethics and Its Need for Empirical Data. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:2747. [PMID: 37685011 PMCID: PMC10487075 DOI: 10.3390/ani13172747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Wittgensteinian approaches to animal ethics highlight the significance of practical concepts like 'pet', 'patient', or 'companion' in shaping our understanding of how we should treat non-human animals. For Wittgensteinian animal ethicists, moral principles alone cannot ground moral judgments about our treatment of animals. Instead, moral reflection must begin with acknowledging the practical relations that tie us to animals. Morality emerges within practical contexts. Context-dependent conceptualisations form our moral outlook. In this paper, we argue that Wittgensteinians should, for methodological reasons, pay more attention to empirical data from the social sciences such as sociology, psychology or anthropology. Such data can ground Wittgensteinians' moral inquiry and thereby render their topical views more dialectically robust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erich Linder
- Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria;
- Vienna Doctoral School of Philosophy, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Herwig Grimm
- Unit of Ethics and Human-Animal-Studies, Messerli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, University of Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Haltaufderheide J, Viero D, Krämer D. Cultural Implications Regarding Privacy in Digital Contact Tracing Algorithms: Method Development and Empirical Ethics Analysis of a German and a Japanese Approach to Contact Tracing. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e45112. [PMID: 37379062 PMCID: PMC10365635 DOI: 10.2196/45112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital contact tracing algorithms (DCTAs) have emerged as a means of supporting pandemic containment strategies and protecting populations from the adverse effects of COVID-19. However, the impact of DCTAs on users' privacy and autonomy has been heavily debated. Although privacy is often viewed as the ability to control access to information, recent approaches consider it as a norm that structures social life. In this regard, cultural factors are crucial in evaluating the appropriateness of information flows in DCTAs. Hence, an important part of ethical evaluations of DCTAs is to develop an understanding of their information flow and their contextual situatedness to be able to adequately evaluate questions about privacy. However, only limited studies and conceptual approaches are currently available in this regard. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop a case study methodology to include contextual cultural factors in ethical analysis and present exemplary results of a subsequent analysis of 2 different DCTAs following this approach. METHODS We conducted a comparative qualitative case study of the algorithm of the Google Apple Exposure Notification Framework as exemplified in the German Corona Warn App and the Japanese approach of Computation of Infection Risk via Confidential Locational Entries (CIRCLE) method. The methodology was based on a postphenomenological perspective, combined with empirical investigations of the technological artifacts within their context of use. An ethics of disclosure approach was used to focus on the social ontologies created by the algorithms and highlight their connection to the question about privacy. RESULTS Both algorithms use the idea of representing a social encounter of 2 subjects. These subjects gain significance in terms of risk against the background of a representation of their temporal and spatial properties. However, the comparative analysis reveals 2 major differences. Google Apple Exposure Notification Framework prioritizes temporality over spatiality. In contrast, the representation of spatiality is reduced to distance without any direction or orientation. However, the CIRCLE framework prioritizes spatiality over temporality. These different concepts and prioritizations can be seen to align with important cultural differences in considering basic concepts such as subject, time, and space in Eastern and Western thought. CONCLUSIONS The differences noted in this study essentially lead to 2 different ethical questions about privacy that are raised against the respective backgrounds. These findings have important implications for the ethical evaluation of DCTAs, suggesting that a culture-sensitive assessment is required to ensure that technologies fit into their context and create less concern regarding their ethical acceptability. Methodologically, our study provides a basis for an intercultural approach to the ethics of disclosure, allowing for cross-cultural dialogue that can overcome mutual implicit biases and blind spots based on cultural differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joschka Haltaufderheide
- Medical Ethics With Focus on Digitization, Joint Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
| | - Davide Viero
- Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dennis Krämer
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Silkoff D, Chenhall R, Guillemin M, McDougall R. The ethical dimensions of everyday alcohol and other drug work: An empirical ethics investigation. Drug Alcohol Rev 2023; 42:614-624. [PMID: 36691114 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The complex and contentious nature of alcohol and other drug (AOD) clinical work affords the likelihood of significant ethical dimensions. However, little attention has been paid to clinicians' perspectives of ethics in their practice within AOD settings. This potentially neglects an important aspect of AOD clinical work. METHODS We used an insider empirical ethics methodology, where the first author (DS) concurrently worked as an AOD clinician in the research setting. Participants were 30 experienced AOD clinicians, working within a large specialist AOD service in Victoria, Australia. We used three qualitative data collection methods: moral conversation, involving semi-structured interviews; moral participation, involving the first author reflecting on his own ethical practices; and participant-observation, involving observation of clinical meetings. We used Applied Thematic Analysis to analyse the data. RESULTS Although participants rarely used explicitly ethical language to describe their work, they described four ethical goals: helping clients to access AOD care and treatment; facilitating change in clients' lives; challenging stigma; and keeping people safe. We argue that these clinical goals should also be conceptualised as ethical goals. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Ethics is an integral component of everyday AOD work. Our findings had some overlap with established ethical principles. Participants demonstrated expertise in engaging with ethical dimensions, without using ethical language. Given the limited attention paid to ethics in AOD clinical settings, increasing the focus on ethics in everyday clinical practice is an important contribution to future AOD clinical work. Its absence negates important aspects of care for clients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Silkoff
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Richard Chenhall
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marilys Guillemin
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rosalind McDougall
- Centre for Health Equity, School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kraaijeveld SR, Mulder BC. Altruistic Vaccination: Insights from Two Focus Group Studies. Health Care Anal 2022; 30:275-295. [PMID: 36454320 PMCID: PMC9713734 DOI: 10.1007/s10728-022-00453-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Vaccination can protect vaccinated individuals and often also prevent them from spreading disease to other people. This opens up the possibility of getting vaccinated for the sake of others. In fact, altruistic vaccination has recently been conceptualized as a kind of vaccination that is undertaken primary for the benefit of others. In order to better understand the potential role of altruistic motives in people's vaccination decisions, we conducted two focus group studies with a total of 37 participants. Study 1 included three focus groups on the subject of HPV vaccination for boys. Study 2 included three focus groups on the subject of pertussis and measles vaccination for childcare workers. We found substantial evidence of other-regarding motives across all focus groups, which suggests that altruistic motives could be an important factor when it comes to people's vaccination decisions. We address the significance of these findings for vaccination policy surrounding HPV vaccination for boys and vaccination for childcare workers. We also extend the findings to normative work on vaccination for the sake of others more generally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bob C. Mulder
- Strategic Communication Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
d'Hoop A. The Moral Life of Doors in an Open Psychiatric Center. Med Anthropol 2021; 41:67-80. [PMID: 34780310 DOI: 10.1080/01459740.2021.1992404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Doors are infamous in psychiatry for being used as instruments of constraint. Yet, while taking a close look at the doors of an open psychiatric center for teenagers in Brussels, I discover that doors play much more ambivalent roles beyond the issue of access and that their normativity shifts in the ongoing practice of care. While examining the moral life of these doors, I describe four modes of reflexivity that unfold with them. These reflexive modes are central to care work, since they put fraught issues on the table and enable a more livable everyday togetherness in institutional care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariane d'Hoop
- Academic Medical Centre, Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Centre de Recherches et d'interventions Sociologiques, Université Saint-Louis, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weber AZ, Harrison A, Pellowski JA. Systematic review of research focused on pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV: A relational ethics perspective. Bioethics 2021; 35:829-838. [PMID: 34318957 PMCID: PMC10695324 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Historically, maternal HIV research has focused on prevention of mother-to-child transmission and child outcomes, with little focus on the health outcomes of mothers. Over the course of the HIV epidemic, the approach to including pregnant women in research has shifted. The current landscape lends itself to reviewing the public health ethics of this research. This systematic review aims to identify ethical barriers and considerations for including pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV in treatment adherence and retention research. We completed a systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines with analysis using a relational ethics perspective. The included studies (n = 7) identified ethical barriers related to (a) women research participants as individuals, (b) partner and family dynamics, (c) community perspectives on research design and conduct, and (d) policy and regulatory implications. These broader contextual factors will yield research responsive to, and respectful of, the needs of pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV. While current regulatory and policy environments may be slow to change, actions can be taken now to foster enabling environments for research. We suggest that a relational approach to public health ethics can best support the needs of pregnant and postpartum women living with HIV; acknowledging this population as systematically disadvantaged and inseparable from their communities will best support the health of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Z. Weber
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Abigail Harrison
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- International Health Institute, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Jennifer A. Pellowski
- Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
- International Health Institute, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Moerenhout T, Devisch I, Cooreman L, Bernaerdt J, De Sutter A, Provoost V. Patients' moral attitudes toward electronic health records: Survey study with vignettes and statements. Health Informatics J 2021; 27:1460458220980039. [PMID: 33446034 DOI: 10.1177/1460458220980039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patient access to electronic health records gives rise to ethical questions related to the patient-doctor-computer relationship. Our study aims to examine patients' moral attitudes toward a shared EHR, with a focus on autonomy, information access, and responsibility. A de novo self-administered questionnaire containing three vignettes and 15 statements was distributed among patients in four different settings. A total of 1688 valid questionnaires were collected. Patients' mean age was 51 years, 61% was female, 50% had a higher degree (college or university), and almost 50% suffered from a chronic illness. Respondents were hesitant to hide sensitive information electronically from their care providers. They also strongly believed hiding information could negatively affect the quality of care provided. Participants preferred to be informed about negative test results in a face-to-face conversation, or would have every patient decide individually how they want to receive results. Patients generally had little experience using patient portal systems and expressed a need for more information on EHRs in this survey. They tended to be hesitant to take up control over their medical data in the EHR and deemed patients share a responsibility for the accuracy of information in their record.
Collapse
|
12
|
Greubel C, Moors EHM, Peine A. From Mattering to Mattering More: 'Goods' and 'Bads' in Ageing and Innovation Policy Discourses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:ijerph18147596. [PMID: 34300047 PMCID: PMC8304814 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18147596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This paper provides an empirical ethics analysis of the goods and bads enacted in EU ageing and innovation policy discourses. It revolves around a case study of the persona Maria, developed as part of the EU's Active and Healthy Ageing Policies. Drawing on Pols' empirical ethics as a theoretical and methodological approach, we describe the variety of goods (practices/situations to be strived for) and bads (practices/situations to be avoided) that are articulated in Maria's persona. We analyse how certain ideas about good and bad ageing-those associated with the use of sophisticated technologies-come to matter more in the solutions proposed for Maria and the framing of her unmet needs, while others which were initially seen as relevant and that describe her dreams, fears and interactions, are marginalised. The paper adds to existing studies of ageing and technology by analysing specific practices that render visible how the idea of technology and data sharing as evidently the right path towards futures of (good) ageing, comes to prevail.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
In the debate on coercion in psychiatry, care and control are often juxtaposed. In this article we argue that this dichotomy is not useful to describe the more complex ways service users, care professionals and the specific care setting interrelate in a community mental health team (CMHT). Using the ethnographic approach of empirical ethics, we contrast the ways in which control and care go together in situations of a psychiatric crisis in two CMHT's: one in Trieste (Italy) and one in Utrecht (the Netherlands). The Dutch and Italian CMHT's are interesting to compare, because they differ with regard to the way community care is organized, the amount of coercive measures, the number of psychiatric beds, and the fact that Trieste applies an open door policy in all care settings. Contrasting the two teams can teach us how in situations of psychiatric crisis control and care interrelate in different choreographies. We use the term choreography as a metaphor to encapsulate the idea of a crisis situation as a set of coordinated actions from different actors in time and space. This provides two choreographies of handling a crisis in different ways. We argue that applying a strict boundary between care and control hinders the use of the relationship between caregiver and patient in care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christien Muusse
- Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hans Kroon
- Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Lambert Mulder
- Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Antes, Parnassia Psychiatric Institute, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Jeannette Pols
- Department Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zou X, Nie JB. Family vulnerability for sick older adults: An empirical ethics study. Nurs Ethics 2020; 28:603-613. [PMID: 33190589 DOI: 10.1177/0969733020964850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, the conventional family-based ageing care model is under pressure from social transitions, raising the question of whether and to what extent families are still capable of dealing with the care of the aged. OBJECTIVE This article examines the vulnerability and inadequacy of families to bear responsibility for the care of the aged against a backdrop of socioeconomic transformation and diminishing institutional support in rural China. RESEARCH DESIGN This article adopts an empirical ethical approach that integrates empirical investigation with ethical inquiry. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT The empirical component of this article focuses on the lived experiences of caring for a wife and mother with dementia in one rural Chinese family, collected from a 6-month fieldwork study conducted at one primary hospital. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS Approval was obtained from the university ethics committee. FINDINGS The empirical study highlights a conflicted family process of managing and negotiating care that indicates the inadequacies and limited ability of families to deal with aged care tasks. In addition, inadequate structures and institutional deficiencies exacerbate the vulnerability of rural families and their inability to offer adequate care. CONCLUSION Acknowledging the vulnerability of families as ageing care providers, this article calls for a socially supported family care model for rural older people in China and also proposes policy recommendations.
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
We argue that once a normative claim is developed, there is an imperative to effect changes based on this norm. As such, ethicists should adopt an "implementation mindset" when formulating norms, and collaborate with others who have the expertise needed to implement policies and practices. To guide this translation of norms into practice, we propose a framework that incorporates implementation science into ethics. Implementation science is a discipline dedicated to supporting the sustained enactment of interventions. We further argue that implementation principles should be integrated into the development of specific normative claims as well as the enactment of these norms. Ethicists formulating a specific norm should consider whether that norm can feasibly be enacted because the resultant specific norm will directly affect the types of interventions subsequently developed. To inform this argument, we will describe the fundamental principles of implementation science, using informed consent to research participation as an illustration.
Collapse
|
16
|
Lydahl D, Hansen Löfstrand C. Doing good: autonomy in the margins of welfare. Sociol Health Illn 2020; 42:892-906. [PMID: 32115744 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The welfare systems in the global North has seen changes in professional care delivery systems in the margins of welfare, from care in large treatment institutions, to community care and, more recently, to care taking place in home spaces. Care and support are increasingly provided in the home of the service user through floating support and home visits. Drawing on empirical ethics, we aim to inquire into modes of doing good care during professional workers' home visits by building on observations of service interactions taking place during these home visits in two different settings: that is, a mental healthcare unit performing home visits in the context of psychiatric care and a special-housing unit performing home visits in the context of homelessness services. We also build on interviews as retrospective reflections on service interactions. Drawing on these empirical materials, we ask what is considered as doing good in the margins of welfare and identify three ideal patterns: the relationality of care, the situatedness of care and the subject of care. Furthermore, these ideal patterns are connected to two different ideals of good care and conceptions of autonomy in care relations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Doris Lydahl
- Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pressing issue of aged care has made gendered caregiving a growing subject of feminist bioethical enquiry. However, the impact of feminism on empirical studies in the area of gendered care in Chinese sociocultural contexts has been less influential. OBJECTIVES To examine female members' lived experiences of gendered care in rural China and offer proper normative evaluation based on their experiences. RESEARCH DESIGN This article adopted an empirical ethical approach that integrates ethnographical investigation and feminist ethical inquiry. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT This article focused on three cases of gendered caregiving for sick older members collected from a 6-month fieldwork conducted in a primary hospital in rural China. ETHICAL CONSIDERATION Approval was obtained from the university ethics committee. FINDINGS The empirical work highlights caregivers' voices of weiqu (a sense of unfairness) resulting from their constrained choice when being pressured to engage in caregiving, which is associated with a disadvantageous socio-institutional and structural backdrop in current rural China. Informed by the conception of structural injustice, the normative analysis of this article traced various forms of social norms, structural deficiencies and ageing welfare institutions, as they intertwine and transmit into additional care deficiencies against rural families and their female caregivers. CONCLUSION This article identified the constraint of gender hierarchy and its intersection with external social structure that exacerbate gendered oppression and exploitation of female labour in rural China. Normatively, this article argues that the current configuration of rural family care, featured by structural impediments and exploration of female labour, is unjust. Some policy recommendations are proposed to empower caregivers and advance care for rural older people.
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Background In bioethics, especially nursing ethics, systematic reviews are increasingly
popular. The overall aim of a systematic review is to provide an overview of
the published discussions on a specific topic. While a meta-review on
systematic reviews on normative bioethical literature has already been
performed, there is no equivalent for systematic reviews of empirical
literature on ethical topics. Objective This meta-review aims to present the general trends and characteristics of
systematic reviews of empirical bioethical literature and to evaluate their
reporting quality. Research design Literature search was performed on PubMed and Google Scholar. Qualitative
content analysis and quantitative approaches were used to evaluate the
systematic reviews. Characteristics of systematic reviews were extracted and
quantitatively analyzed. The reporting quality was measured using an adapted
PRISMA checklist. Findings Seventy-six reviews were selected for analysis. Most reviews came from the
field of nursing (next to bioethics and medicine). Selected systematic
reviews investigated issues related to clinical ethics (50%), followed by
research ethics (36%) and public health ethics or organizational ethics
(14%). In all, 72% of the systematic reviews included authors’ ethical
reflections on the findings and 59% provided ethical recommendations.
Despite the heterogeneous reporting of the reviews, reviews using PRISMA
tended to score better regarding reporting quality. Discussion The heterogeneity currently observed is due both to the interdisciplinary
nature of nursing ethics and bioethics, and to the emerging nature of
systematic review methods in these fields. These results confirm the
findings of our previous review of systematic reviews on normative
literature, thereby highlighting a recurring methodological gap in
systematic reviews of bioethical literature. This also indicates the need to
develop more robust methodological standards. Conclusion Through its extensive overview of the characteristics of systematic reviews
of empirical literature on ethical topics, this meta-review is expected to
inform further discussions on minimal standards and reporting
guidelines.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
Practical wisdom is a key concept in the field of virtue ethics, and it has played a significant role in the thinking of those who make use of virtue when theorising medical practice and ethics. In this article, we examine how storytelling and practical wisdom play integral roles in the medical ethics education of junior doctors. Using a qualitative approach, we conducted 46 interviews with a cohort of junior doctors to explore the role doctors feel phronesis has in their medical ethics practice and how they acquire practical wisdom through storytelling as an essential part of their medical ethics education. Through thematic analysis of the interviews, we discuss the key role storytelling about moral exemplars and role models plays in developing medical ethics education, and how telling stories about role models is considered to be one of the most useful ways to learn medical ethics. We finish by developing an argument for why practical wisdom should be an important part of medical ethics training, focusing on the important role that phronesis narratives should have in teaching medical ethics.
Collapse
|
20
|
Schofield G, Brangan E, Dittborn M, Huxtable R, Selman L. Real-world ethics in palliative care: protocol for a systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028480. [PMID: 31133595 PMCID: PMC6538058 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 03/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ethical issues arise daily in the delivery of palliative care. Despite much (largely theoretical) literature, evidence from specialist palliative care practitioners (SPCPs) about real-world ethical challenges has not previously been synthesised. This evidence is crucial to inform education and training and adequately support staff. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the evidence regarding the ethical challenges which SPCPs encounter during clinical practice. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will conduct a systematic review with narrative synthesis of empirical studies that use inductive methods to describe the ethical challenges reported by SPCPs. We will search multiple databases (MEDLINE, Philosopher's Index, EMBASE, PsycINFO, LILACS, WHOLIS, Web of Science and CINAHL) without time, language or geographical restrictions. Keywords will be developed from scoping searches, consultation with information specialists and reference to key systematic reviews in palliative care and bioethics. Reference lists of included studies will be hand-searched. 10% of retrieved titles and abstracts will be independently dual screened, as will all full text papers. Quality will be dual assessed using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool (2018). Narrative synthesis following Popay et al (2006) will be used to synthesise findings. The strength of resulting recommendations will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for qualitative evidence (GRADE-CERQual). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION As this review will include only published data, no specific ethical approval is required. We anticipate that the systematic review will be of interest to palliative care practitioners of all backgrounds and educators in palliative care and medical ethics. Findings will be presented at conferences and published open access in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018105365.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guy Schofield
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Emer Brangan
- The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West (NIHR CLAHRC West), University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Mariana Dittborn
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Richard Huxtable
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Lucy Selman
- School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Seidlein AH, Buchholz I, Buchholz M, Salloch S. Relationships and burden: An empirical-ethical investigation of lived experience in home nursing arrangements. Bioethics 2019; 33:448-456. [PMID: 30957896 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 01/13/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Quantitative research has called attention to the burden associated with informal caregiving in home nursing arrangements. Less emphasis has been placed, however, on care recipients' subjective feelings of being a burden and on caregivers' willingness to carry the burden in home care. This article uses empirical material from semi-structured interviews conducted with older people affected by multiple chronic conditions and in need of long-term home care, and with informal and professional caregivers, as two groups of relevant others. The high burden of home-care arrangements is unanimously stressed by all three groups involved in the triangle of care. An empirical-ethical investigation of what can be legitimately expected from family members and informal caregivers, informed by Frith's symbiotic empirical ethics approach, was undertaken. Key tenets from the special goods theory and nursing professionalism are used as analytical tools. The study concludes that the current situation may hinder professional development and can reinforce feelings of being a burden to relevant others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Henrikje Seidlein
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ines Buchholz
- Department of Methods, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Maresa Buchholz
- Department of Methods, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
The 2016 outbreak of the Zika arbovirus was associated with large numbers of cases of the newly‐recognised Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS). This novel teratogenic epidemic raises significant ethical and practical issues. Many of these arise from strategies used to avoid cases of CZS, with contraception in particular being one proposed strategy that is atypical in epidemic control. Using contraception to reduce the burden of CZS has an ethical complication: interventions that impact the timing of conception alter which people will exist in the future. This so‐called ‘non‐identity problem’ potentially has significant social justice implications for evaluating contraception, that may affect our prioritisation of interventions to tackle Zika. This paper combines ethical analysis of the non‐identity problem with empirical data from a novel survey about the general public's moral intuitions. The ethical analysis examines different perspectives on the non‐identity problem, and their implications for using contraception in response to Zika. The empirical section reports the results of an online survey of 93 members of the US general public exploring their intuitions about the non‐identity problem in the context of the Zika epidemic. Respondents indicated a general preference for a person‐affecting intervention (mosquito control) over an impersonal intervention (contraception). However, their responses did not appear to be strongly influenced by the non‐identity problem. Despite its potential philosophical significance, we conclude from both theoretical considerations and analysis of the attitudes of the community that the non‐identity problem should not affect how we prioritise contraception relative to other interventions to avoid CZS.
Collapse
|
23
|
Cookson R, Ali S, Tsuchiya A, Asaria M. E-learning and health inequality aversion: A questionnaire experiment. Health Econ 2018; 27:1754-1771. [PMID: 30033581 PMCID: PMC6221064 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
In principle, questionnaire data on public views about hypothetical trade-offs between improving total health and reducing health inequality can provide useful normative health inequality aversion parameter benchmarks for policymakers faced with real trade-offs of this kind. However, trade-off questions can be hard to understand, and one standard type of question finds that a high proportion of respondents-sometimes a majority-appear to give exclusive priority to reducing health inequality. We developed and tested two e-learning interventions designed to help respondents understand this question more completely. The interventions were a video animation, exposing respondents to rival points of view, and a spreadsheet-based questionnaire that provided feedback on implied trade-offs. We found large effects of both interventions in reducing the proportion of respondents giving exclusive priority to reducing health inequality, though the median responses still implied a high degree of health inequality aversion and-unlike the video-the spreadsheet-based intervention introduced a substantial new minority of non-egalitarian responses. E-learning may introduce as well as avoid biases but merits further research and may be useful in other questionnaire studies involving trade-offs between conflicting values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Centre for Health Economics and Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Aki Tsuchiya
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), and Department of EconomicsUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Miqdad Asaria
- LSE HealthLondon School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)LondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hoffmaster B. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics. Bioethics 2018; 32:119-125. [PMID: 29280167 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Bioethics became applied ethics when it was assimilated to moral philosophy. Because deduction is the rationality of moral philosophy, subsuming facts under moral principles to deduce conclusions about what ought to be done became the prescribed reasoning of bioethics, and bioethics became a theory comprised of moral principles. Bioethicists now realize that applied ethics is too abstract and spare to apprehend the specificity, particularity, complexity and contingency of real moral issues. Empirical ethics and contextual ethics are needed to incorporate these features into morality, not just bioethics. The relevant facts and features of problems have to be identified, investigated and framed coherently, and potential resolutions have to be constructed and assessed. Moreover, these tasks are pursued and melded within manifold contexts, for example, families, work and health care systems, as well as societal, economic, legal and political backgrounds and encompassing worldviews. This naturalist orientation and both empirical ethics and contextual ethics require judgment, but how can judgment be rational? Rationality, fortunately, is more expansive than deductive reasoning. Judgment is rational when it emanates from a rational process of deliberation, and a process of deliberation is rational when it uses the resources of non-formal reason: observation, creative construction, formal and informal reasoning methods and systematic critical assessment. Empirical ethics and contextual ethics recognize that finite, fallible human beings live in complex, dynamic, contingent worlds, and they foster creative, critical deliberation and employ non-formal reason to make rational moral judgments.
Collapse
|
25
|
Forlini C. Patient Preferences May Be Indicative of Normative Issues in Dementia Research. J Alzheimers Dis 2017; 59:11-12. [PMID: 28550265 DOI: 10.3233/jad-170328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Robillard and Feng highlight incongruence between patient preferences and the procedural aspects of research ethics as they relate to protocols for dementia research. Their findings break ground for a reassessment of how research ethics, researchers, and participants (including patients and caregivers) approach participation in dementia research. However, it is unclear whether patient preferences may also herald a normative gap between how dementia research is being conducted and how it should be done. This response uses one of Robillard and Feng's findings to illustrate how descriptive empirical data might be reinterpreted into normative questions that reframe current practices in the context of dementia research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Forlini
- ARC DECRA Research Fellow, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Etheredge H, Penn C, Watermeyer J. Opt-in or opt-out to increase organ donation in South Africa? Appraising proposed strategies using an empirical ethics analysis. Dev World Bioeth 2017; 18:119-125. [PMID: 28508541 DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Utilising empirical ethics analysis, we evaluate the merits of systems proposed to increase deceased organ donation in South Africa (SA). We conclude that SA should maintain its soft opt-in policy, and enhance it with 'required transplant referral' in order to maximise donor numbers within an ethically and legally acceptable framework. In SA, as is the case worldwide, the demand for donor organs far exceeds the supply thereof. Currently utilising a soft opt-in system, SA faces the challenge of how to increase donor numbers in a context which is imbued with inequalities in access to healthcare, multiplicitous personal beliefs and practices, distrust of organ transplant and varying levels of education and health literacy. We argue that a hard opt-in, opt-out or mandated consent system would be problematic, and we present empirical data from Gauteng Province illustrating barriers to ethically sound practice in soft consent systems. Ultimately, we argue that in spite of some limitations, a soft opt-in system is most realistic for SA because its implementation does not require extensive public education campaigns at national level, and it does not threaten to further erode trust at a clinical level. However, to circumvent some of the clinical-level barriers identified in our empirical study, we propose a contextually sensitive option for "enabling" soft opt-in through "required transplant referral". We argue that this system is legally defensible, enhances ethical practice and could also increase donor numbers as it has in many other countries.
Collapse
|
27
|
Wäscher S, Salloch S, Ritter P, Vollmann J, Schildmann J. Methodological Reflections on the Contribution of Qualitative Research to the Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services. Bioethics 2017; 31:237-245. [PMID: 28417519 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 09/24/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This article describes a process of developing, implementing and evaluating a clinical ethics support service intervention with the goal of building up a context-sensitive structure of minimal clinical-ethics in an oncology department without prior clinical ethics structure. Scholars from different disciplines have called for an improvement in the evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS) for different reasons over several decades. However, while a lot has been said about the concepts and methodological challenges of evaluating CESS up to the present time, relatively few empirical studies have been carried out. The aim of this article is twofold. On the one hand, it describes a process of development, modifying and evaluating a CESS intervention as part of the ETHICO research project, using the approach of qualitative-formative evaluation. On the other hand, it provides a methodological analysis which specifies the contribution of qualitative empirical methods to the (formative) evaluation of CESS. We conclude with a consideration of the strengths and limitations of qualitative evaluation research with regards to the evaluation and development of context sensitive CESS. We further discuss our own approach in contrast to rather traditional consult or committee models.
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participant selection for first-in-human (fih) trials involves complex decisions. The trial design makes it unlikely that participants will receive clinically relevant therapeutic benefit, but they are likely to experience risks of various magnitudes and types. The aim of the present paper was to describe and discuss the views of investigators and ethics committee members about the choice of trial participants for fih trials in cancer nanomedicine. METHODS We drew insights from an exploratory qualitative study involving thematic analysis of 46 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders in Europe and North America involved in fih nanomedicine trials. The present work draws on subset of 21 interviews with investigators and ethics committee members who have either conducted or reviewed a fih cancer nanomedicine trial or are planning one. RESULTS Investigators and ethics committee members are aware of the ethics standards for recruiting patients with end-stage cancer into fih trials, but they nonetheless question the practice and provide reasons against it. CONCLUSIONS Although it is a standard and ethically accepted practice to enrol patients with end-stage cancer and no treatment options into fih trials of investigational chemotherapeutic molecules, doing so can threaten the validity and generalizability of the trials, thereby weakening translational research. Another possibility is to stratify and include patients with less advanced disease who demonstrate certain biomarkers or cancer genotypes and who have a disease profile similar to that tested in preclinical studies. The latter approach could be a step toward personalized medical research and targeted drug development. Such a patient selection approach requires multi-stakeholder discussion to reach scientific and ethics consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Satalkar
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - B S Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| | - D M Shaw
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pols J. Good relations with technology: Empirical ethics and aesthetics in care. Nurs Philos 2016; 18. [PMID: 27758077 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Revised: 08/15/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This article is a written version of the lecture for the IPONS conference in Stockholm. The article starts from the claim that there is no such thing as technology, only different variations of technologies. These technologies, plural, all have their specific workings that we can only learn about by studying these empirically, by analysing the relations between people and their technologies. These relations are always unpredictable, as it is not given beforehand what values the participants pursue. Studying and understanding the workings of healthcare technology is a crucial task for nursing studies, as nurses are often key actors in making these devices work. The article hands the reader some tools to engage in the study of technologies in practice, using an empirical ethics approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeannette Pols
- Department of General Practice, Section of Medical Ethics, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
This article explores power relations between clinicians, patients and families as clinicians engage in patient-centred ethical work. Specifically, we draw on actor-network theory to interrogate the role of non-human elements in distributing power relations in clinical settings, as clinicians attempt to manage the expectations of patients and families. Using the activities of a multidisciplinary team providing deep brain stimulation to children with severe movement disorders as an example, we illustrate how a patient-centred tool is implicated in establishing relations that constitute four modes of power: 'power over', 'power to', "power storage" and "power/discretion". We argue that understanding the role of non-human elements in structuring power relations can guide and inform bioethical discussions on the suitability of patient-centred approaches in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Gardner
- Science and Technology Studies UnitDepartment of SociologyUniversity of YorkYorkUK
| | - Alan Cribb
- Department of Education and Professional StudiesKings College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Recently the World Health Organization (WHO) has highlighted the need to strengthen mental health systems following emergencies, including natural and manmade disasters. Mental health services need to be informed by culturally attuned evidence that is developed through research. Therefore, there is an urgent need to establish rigorous ethical research practice to underpin the evidence-base for mental health services delivered during and following emergencies.
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Ethical perspectives on the use of stimulants to enhance human cognitive performance (neuroenhancement) are polarized between conservative and liberal theories offering opposing advice on whether individuals have a right to use neuroenhancers and what the social outcomes of neuroenhancement might be. Meanwhile, empirical evidence shows modest prevalence and guarded public attitudes toward the neuroenhancement use of stimulants. In this Perspective, we argue that the dissonance between the prescriptions of ethical theories (what ought to be) and empirical evidence (what is) has impaired our understanding of neuroenhancement practices. This dissonance is a result of three common errors in research on the ethics of neuroenhancement: (1) expecting that public perspectives will conform to a prescriptive ethical framework; (2) ignoring the socio-economic infrastructures that influence individuals' decisions on whether or not to use neuroenhancement; and (3) overlooking conflicts between fundamental ethical values namely, safety of neuroenhancement and autonomy. We argue that in order to understand neuroenhancement practices it is essential to recognize which values affect individual decisions to use or refuse to use neuroenhancement. Future research on the ethics of neuroenhancement should assess the morally significant values for stakeholders. This will fill the gap between what ought to be done and what is done with an improved understanding of what can be done within a particular context. Clarifying conflicts between competing moral values is critical in conducting research on the efficacy of substances putatively used for neuroenhancement and also on neuroenhancement practices within academic, professional and social environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Forlini
- The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia
| | - Wayne Hall
- The University of Queensland Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, BrisbaneQLD, Australia
- National Addiction Centre, King’s College LondonLondon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about case managers' ethical issues and professional values. OBJECTIVES This article presents an overview of ethical issues in case managers' current practice. Findings are examined in the light of nursing ethics, social work ethics and principle-based biomedical ethics. RESEARCH DESIGN A systematic literature review was performed to identify and analyse empirical studies concerning ethical issues in case management programmes. It was completed by systematic content analysis of case managers' national codes of ethics. FINDINGS Only nine empirical studies were identified, eight of them from North America. The main dilemmas were how to balance system goals against the client's interest and client protection against autonomy. Professional codes of ethics shared important similarities, but offered different responses to these two dilemmas. DISCUSSION We discuss the respective roles of professional and organizational ethics. Further lines of research are suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Corvol
- Rennes University Hospital, France; German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany; Centre de Recherches sur l'Action Politique en Europe, France
| | - Grégoire Moutel
- PRES Sorbonne Paris Cité, France; Management of Health Organization (EA 7348), EHESP, France; Paris University Hospital (APHP), France
| | - Dominique Somme
- Rennes 1 University, France; Rennes University Hospital, France; Centre for Research on Political Action in Europe (CRAPE), France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
The field of population and public health ethics (PPHE) has yet to fully embrace the generation of evidence as an important project. This article reviews the philosophical debates related to the 'empirical turn' in clinical bioethics, and critically analyses how PPHE has and can engage with the philosophical implications of generating empirical data within the task of normative inquiry. A set of five conceptual and theoretical issues pertaining to population health that are unresolved and could potentially benefit from empirical PPHE approaches to normative inquiry are discussed. Each issue differs from traditional empirical bioethical approaches, in that they emphasize (1) concerns related to the population, (2) 'upstream' policy-relevant health interventions - within and outside of the health care system and (3) the prevention of illness and disease. Within each theoretical issue, a conceptual example from population and public health approaches to HIV prevention and health promotion is interrogated. Based on the review and critical analysis, this article concludes that empirical-normative approaches to population and public health ethics would be most usefully pursued as an iterative project (rather than as a linear project), in which the normative informs the empirical questions to be asked and new empirical evidence constantly directs conceptualizations of what constitutes morally robust public health practices. Finally, a conceptualization of an empirical population and public health ethics is advanced in order to open up new interdisciplinary 'spaces', in which empirical and normative approaches to ethical inquiry are transparently (and ethically) integrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod Knight
- Simon Fraser University, Canada; The University of British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Brosnan C, Cribb A. Between the bench, the bedside and the office: The need to build bridges between working neuroscientists and ethicists. Clin Ethics 2014; 9:113-119. [PMID: 25473379 PMCID: PMC4246054 DOI: 10.1177/1477750914558549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This paper presents findings from an empirical study that explored the meaning of ethics in the everyday work of neuroscientists. Observation and interviews were carried out in one neuroscience research group that was involved in bench-to-bedside translational research. We focus here specifically on the scientists’ perceptions of bioethics. Interviewees were often unfamiliar with bioethics as a discipline, particularly the more junior members of the group. Those who were aware of its existence largely viewed it as something distant from them, and as either too abstract, not relevant or an alien imposition on their work. Some interviewees themselves pointed to the need for better ‘bridge building’ between ethical principles and real-world examples drawn from scientific practice, and we argue that this space is where a more empirically grounded ethics may be useful in terms of actually engaging scientists at both the bench and the bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caragh Brosnan
- School of Humanities & Social Science, University of Newcastle, Australia; Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, UK
| | - Alan Cribb
- School of Humanities & Social Science, University of Newcastle, Australia; Centre for Public Policy Research, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mertz M, Sofaer N, Strech D. Did we describe what you meant? Findings and methodological discussion of an empirical validation study for a systematic review of reasons. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15:69. [PMID: 25262532 PMCID: PMC4179861 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 09/22/2014] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The systematic review of reasons is a new way to obtain comprehensive information about specific ethical topics. One such review was carried out for the question of why post-trial access to trial drugs should or need not be provided. The objective of this study was to empirically validate this review using an author check method. The article also reports on methodological challenges faced by our study. METHODS We emailed a questionnaire to the 64 corresponding authors of those papers that were assessed in the review of reasons on post-trial access. The questionnaire consisted of all quotations ("reason mentions") that were identified by the review to represent a reason in a given author's publication, together with a set of codings for the quotations. The authors were asked to rate the correctness of the codings. RESULTS We received 19 responses, from which only 13 were completed questionnaires. In total, 98 quotations and their related codes in the 13 questionnaires were checked by the addressees. For 77 quotations (79%), all codings were deemed correct, for 21 quotations (21%), some codings were deemed to need correction. Most corrections were minor and did not imply a complete misunderstanding of the citation. CONCLUSIONS This first attempt to validate a review of reasons leads to four crucial methodological questions relevant to the future conduct of such validation studies: 1) How can a description of a reason be deemed incorrect? 2) Do the limited findings of this author check study enable us to determine whether the core results of the analysed SRR are valid? 3) Why did the majority of surveyed authors refrain from commenting on our understanding of their reasoning? 4) How can the method for validating reviews of reasons be improved?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Mertz
- Research Unit Ethics, Institute for History and Ethics of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Herderstr. 54, D-50925 Cologne, Germany
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Neema Sofaer
- Centre of Medical Law & Ethics, King’s College London, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, UK
| | - Daniel Strech
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
In recent years there has been a wealth of literature arguing the need for empirical and interdisciplinary approaches to bioethics, based on the premise that an empirically informed ethical analysis is more grounded, contextually sensitive and therefore more relevant to clinical practice than an 'abstract' philosophical analysis. Bioethics has (arguably) always been an interdisciplinary field, and the rise of 'empirical' (bio)ethics need not be seen as an attempt to give a new name to the longstanding practice of interdisciplinary collaboration, but can perhaps best be understood as a substantive attempt to engage with the nature of that interdisciplinarity and to articulate the relationship between the many different disciplines (some of them empirical) that contribute to the field. It can also be described as an endeavour to explain how different disciplinary approaches can be integrated to effectively answer normative questions in bioethics, and fundamental to that endeavour is the need to think about how a robust methodology can be articulated that successfully marries apparently divergent epistemological and metaethical perspectives with method. This paper proposes 'Reflexive Bioethics' (RB) as a methodology for interdisciplinary and empirical bioethics, which utilizes a method of 'Reflexive Balancing' (RBL). RBL has been developed in response to criticisms of various forms of reflective equilibrium, and is built upon a pragmatic characterization of Bioethics and a 'quasi-moral foundationalism', which allows RBL to avoid some of the difficulties associated with RE and yet retain the flexible egalitarianism that makes it intuitively appealing to many.
Collapse
|
38
|
Mertz M, Inthorn J, Renz G, Rothenberger LG, Salloch S, Schildmann J, Wöhlke S, Schicktanz S. Research across the disciplines: a road map for quality criteria in empirical ethics research. BMC Med Ethics 2014; 15:17. [PMID: 24580847 PMCID: PMC3974020 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Accepted: 02/10/2014] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research in the field of Empirical Ethics (EE) uses a broad variety of empirical methodologies, such as surveys, interviews and observation, developed in disciplines such as sociology, anthropology, and psychology. Whereas these empirical disciplines see themselves as purely descriptive, EE also aims at normative reflection. Currently there is literature about the quality of empirical research in ethics, but little or no reflection on specific methodological aspects that must be considered when conducting interdisciplinary empirical ethics. Furthermore, poor methodology in an EE study results in misleading ethical analyses, evaluations or recommendations. This not only deprives the study of scientific and social value, but also risks ethical misjudgement. DISCUSSION While empirical and normative-ethical research projects have quality criteria in their own right, we focus on the specific quality criteria for EE research. We develop a tentative list of quality criteria--a "road map"--tailored to interdisciplinary research in EE, to guide assessments of research quality. These quality criteria fall into the categories of primary research question, theoretical framework and methods, relevance, interdisciplinary research practice and research ethics and scientific ethos. SUMMARY EE research is an important and innovative development in bioethics. However, a lack of standards has led to concerns about and even rejection of EE by various scholars. Our suggested orientation list of criteria, presented in the form of reflective questions, cannot be considered definitive, but serves as a tool to provoke systematic reflection during the planning and composition of an EE research study. These criteria need to be tested in different EE research settings and further refined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Mertz
- Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Research Unit Ethics, University of Cologne, Herderstr. 54, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
- Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Julia Inthorn
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Günter Renz
- Protestant Academy Bad Boll, Bad Boll, Akademieweg 11, D-73087 Bad Boll, Germany
| | - Lillian Geza Rothenberger
- Formerly at: Institute of Ethics and History in Medicine, Centre for Medicine, Society and Prevention, University of Tübingen, Gartenstr 47, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, NRW Junior Research Group “Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism”, Ruhr University Bochum, Malakowturm, Markstr 258a, D-44799 Bochum, Germany
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, NRW Junior Research Group “Medical Ethics at the End of Life: Norm and Empiricism”, Ruhr University Bochum, Malakowturm, Markstr 258a, D-44799 Bochum, Germany
| | - Sabine Wöhlke
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
| | - Silke Schicktanz
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Humboldtallee 36, D-37073 Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informed consent is a legal and ethical doctrine derived from the principle of respect for autonomy. Generally two rights derived from autonomy are accorded legal protection. The constitutional right to bodily integrity followed by the right to bodily well-being, protected by professional negligence rules. Therefore healthcare professionals treating patients' without valid consent may be guilty of infringing patients' rights. Many challenges are experienced by doctors obtaining informed consent in complex multicultural societies like South Africa. These include different cultural ethos, multilingualism, poverty, education, unfamiliarity with libertarian rights based autonomy, and power asymmetry between doctors and patients. All of which could impact on the ability of doctors to obtain legally valid informed consent. METHODS The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the quality of informed consent obtained by doctors practicing in South Africa is consistent with international ethical standards and local regulations. Responses from 946 participants including doctors, nurses and patients was analyzed, using a semi-structured self-administered questionnaire and person triangulation in selected public hospitals in Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. RESULTS The median age of 168 doctors participating was 30 years with 51% females, 28% interns, 16% medical officers, 26% registrars, 30% consultant/specialists. A broad range of clinical specialties were represented. Challenges to informed consent practice include language difficulties, lack of interpreters, workload, and time constraints. Doctors spent 5-10 minutes on consent, disclosed most information required to patients, however knowledge of essential local laws was inadequate. Informed consent aggregate scores (ICAS) showed that interns/registrars scored lower than consultants/specialists. ICAS scores were statistically significant by specialty (p = 0.005), with radiologists and anaesthetists scoring lowest, while internists, GPs and obstetricians/gynaecologists scored highest. Comparative ICAS scores showed that professional nurses scored significantly lower than doctors (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that though doctors had general knowledge of informed consent requirements, execution in practice was inadequate, with deficiency in knowledge of basic local laws and regulations. Remedying identified deficiencies may require a 'corps' of interpreters in local hospitals to assist doctors in dealing with language difficulties, and continuing education in medical law and ethics to improve informed consent practices and overall quality of healthcare service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvester C Chima
- Programme of Bio & Research Ethics and Medical Law, Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine and School of Nursing and Public Health College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal Durban, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
The principle of providing post-trial access for research participants to successful products of that research is widely accepted and has been enshrined in various declarations and guidelines. While recent ethical guidelines recognise that the responsibility to provide post-trial access extends to sponsors, regulators and government bodies as well as to researchers, it is the researchers who have the direct duty of care to participants. Researchers may thus need to act as advocates for trial participants, especially where government bodies, sponsors, and regulatory bodies have complex interests vested in decisions about whether or not new interventions are made available, how, and to whom. This paper provides an empirical account of post-trial access in the context of HIV prevention research. It describes both access to the successful products of research and the provision antiretroviral drugs for trial participants who acquire HIV. First, we provide evidence that, in the current system, there is considerable variation in the duration and timeliness of access. We then argue that by analysing the difficulties faced by researchers to this point, and their efforts to meet this obligation, much can be learned about how to secure post-trial access in HIV biomedical preventions trials. While researchers alone have a limited obligation, their advocacy on behalf of trial participants may be necessary to call the other parties to account.
Collapse
|
41
|
Brosnan C, Cribb A, Wainwright SP, Williams C. Neuroscientists' everyday experiences of ethics: the interplay of regulatory, professional, personal and tangible ethical spheres. Sociol Health Illn 2013; 35:1133-1148. [PMID: 23397962 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The ethical issues neuroscience raises are subject to increasing attention, exemplified in the emergence of the discipline neuroethics. While the moral implications of neurotechnological developments are often discussed, less is known about how ethics intersects with everyday work in neuroscience and how scientists themselves perceive the ethics of their research. Drawing on observation and interviews with members of one UK group conducting neuroscience research at both the laboratory bench and in the clinic, this article examines what ethics meant to these researchers and delineates four specific types of ethics that shaped their day-to-day work: regulatory, professional, personal and tangible. While the first three categories are similar to those identified elsewhere in sociological work on scientific and clinical ethics, the notion of 'tangible ethics' emerged by attending to everyday practice, in which these scientists' discursive distinctions between right and wrong were sometimes challenged. The findings shed light on how ethical positions produce and are, in turn, produced by scientific practice. Informing sociological understandings of neuroscience, they also throw the category of neuroscience and its ethical specificity into question, given that members of this group did not experience their work as raising issues that were distinctly neuro-ethical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caragh Brosnan
- School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Newcastle, AustraliaCentre for Public Policy Research, King's College LondonDepartment of Sociology and Communications, Brunel University, London
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Marsh V, Kombe F, Fitzpatrick R, Williams TN, Parker M, Molyneux S. Consulting communities on feedback of genetic findings in international health research: sharing sickle cell disease and carrier information in coastal Kenya. BMC Med Ethics 2013; 14:41. [PMID: 24125465 PMCID: PMC4016314 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-41] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2013] [Accepted: 09/13/2013] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND International health research in malaria-endemic settings may include screening for sickle cell disease, given the relationship between this important genetic condition and resistance to malaria, generating questions about whether and how findings should be disclosed. The literature on disclosing genetic findings in the context of research highlights the role of community consultation in understanding and balancing ethically important issues from participants' perspectives, including social forms of benefit and harm, and the influence of access to care. To inform research practice locally, and contribute to policy more widely, this study aimed to explore the views of local residents in Kilifi County in coastal Kenya on how researchers should manage study-generated information on sickle cell disease and carrier status. METHODS Between June 2010 and July 2011, we consulted 62 purposively selected Kilifi residents on how researchers should manage study-generated sickle cell disease findings. Methods drew on a series of deliberative informed small group discussions. Data were analysed thematically, using charts, to describe participants' perceptions of the importance of disclosing findings, including reasoning, difference and underlying values. Themes were derived from the underlying research questions and from issues emerging from discussions. Data interpretation drew on relevant areas of social science and bioethics literature. RESULTS Perceived health and social benefits generated strong support for disclosing findings on sickle cell disease, but the balance of social benefits and harms was less clear for sickle cell trait. Many forms of health and social benefits and harms of information-sharing were identified, with important underlying values related to family interests and the importance of openness. The influence of micro and macro level contextual features and prioritization of values led to marked diversity of opinion. CONCLUSIONS The approach demonstrates a high ethical importance in many malaria endemic low-to-middle income country settings of disclosing sickle cell disease findings generated during research, alongside provision of effective care and locally-informed counselling. Since these services are central to the benefits of disclosure, health researchers whose studies include screening for sickle cell disease should actively promote the development of health policy and services for this condition in situations of unmet need, including through the prior development of collaborative partnerships with government health managers and providers. Community consultation can importantly enrich ethical debate on research practice where in-depth exploration of informed views and the potential for difference are taken into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Marsh
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 230, Kilifi 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LT, UK
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Francis Kombe
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 230, Kilifi 80108, Kenya
| | - Raymond Fitzpatrick
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Thomas N Williams
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 230, Kilifi 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LT, UK
- Department of Medicine, Imperial College, St Mary’s Hospital, London W21NY, UK
| | - Michael Parker
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 230, Kilifi 80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Churchill Hospital, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LT, UK
- Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Oxford University, Rosemary Rue Building, Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research is fundamental to improving the quality of health care. The need for regulation of research is clear. However, the bureaucratic complexity of research governance has raised concerns that the regulatory mechanisms intended to protect participants now threaten to undermine or stifle the research enterprise, especially as this relates to sensitive topics and hard to reach groups. DISCUSSION Much criticism of research governance has focused on long delays in obtaining ethical approvals, restrictions imposed on study conduct, and the inappropriateness of evaluating qualitative studies within the methodological and risk assessment frameworks applied to biomedical and clinical research. Less attention has been given to the different epistemologies underlying biomedical and qualitative investigation. The bioethical framework underpinning current regulatory structures is fundamentally at odds with the practice of emergent, negotiated micro-ethics required in qualitative research. The complex and shifting nature of real world settings delivers unanticipated ethical issues and (occasionally) genuine dilemmas which go beyond easy or formulaic 'procedural' resolution. This is not to say that qualitative studies are 'unethical' but that their ethical nature can only be safeguarded through the practice of 'micro-ethics' based on the judgement and integrity of researchers in the field. SUMMARY This paper considers the implications of contrasting ethical paradigms for the conduct of qualitative research and the value of 'empirical ethics' as a means of liberating qualitative (and other) research from an outmoded and unduly restrictive research governance framework based on abstract prinicipalism, divorced from real world contexts and values.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristian Pollock
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Physiotherapy, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2HA, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We investigated how often journal articles reporting on human HIV research in four developing world countries mention any institutional review boards (IRBs) or research ethics committees (RECs), and what factors are involved. METHODS We examined all such articles published in 2007 from India, Nigeria, Thailand and Uganda, and coded these for several ethical and other characteristics. RESULTS Of 221 articles meeting inclusion criteria, 32.1% did not mention IRB approval. Mention of IRB approval was associated with: biomedical (versus psychosocial) research (P=0.001), more sponsor-country authors (P=0.003), sponsor-country corresponding author (P=0.047), mention of funding (P<0.001), particular host-country involved (P=0.002), journals having sponsor-country editors (P<0.001), and journal stated compliance with International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines (P=0.003). Logistic regression identified 3 significant factors: mention of funding, journal having sponsor-country editors and research being biomedical. CONCLUSIONS One-third of articles still do not mention IRB approval. Mention varied by country, and was associated with biomedical research, and more sponsor country involvement. Recently, some journals have required mention of IRB approval, but allow authors to do so in cover letters to editors, not in the article itself. Instead, these data suggest, journals should require that articles document adherence to ethical standards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Klitzman
- Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons-Psychiatry, 1051 Riverside Drive, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Background: International guidelines for medical research involving human subjects maintain the primacy of informed consent while recognizing cultural diversity. Methods: This article draws on empirical data obtained from interviews with physician-researchers in teaching hospitals of Lahore, Pakistan, to identify social and cultural factors that affect the consent process for participants in research. Results: This article presents variable findings with regards to communication, comprehension, and decision making. While some physicians consider that social factors such as lack of education, a patriarchal family system, and skepticism about research can make patients dependent on either the physician-researcher or the family, others believe that patients do make independent decisions. Conclusions: In light of the findings, the article ends with a recommendation for communication and decision making that is sensitive to the local sociocultural environment while at the same time meeting the ethical imperative of respect for persons.
Collapse
|
46
|
Owen GS, Ster IC, David AS, Szmukler G, Hayward P, Richardson G, Hotopf M. Regaining mental capacity for treatment decisions following psychiatric admission: a clinico-ethical study. Psychol Med 2011; 41:119-128. [PMID: 20346192 PMCID: PMC7611689 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291710000383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental capacity is an emerging ethical legal concept in psychiatric settings but its relation to clinical parameters remains uncertain. We sought to investigate the associations of regaining capacity to make treatment decisions following approximately 1 month of in-patient psychiatric treatment. METHOD We followed up 115 consecutive patients admitted to a psychiatric hospital who were judged to lack capacity to make treatment decisions at the point of hospitalization. We were primarily interested in whether the diagnosis of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder associated with reduced chances of regaining capacity compared with other diagnoses and whether affective symptoms on admission associated with increased chances of regaining capacity. In addition, we examined how change in insight was associated with regaining capacity in schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder (BPAD)-mania, and depression. RESULTS We found evidence that the category of 'schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder' associated with not regaining capacity at 1 month compared with BPAD-mania [odds ratio (OR) 3.62, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.13-11.6] and depression (OR 5.35, 95% CI 1.47-9.55) and that affective symptoms on admission associated with regaining capacity (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.02-1.48). In addition, using an interaction model, we found some evidence that gain in insight may not be a good indicator of regaining capacity in patients with depression compared with patients with schizophrenia and BPAD-mania. CONCLUSIONS We suggest that clinico-ethical studies using mental capacity provide a way of assessing the validity of nosological and other clinical concepts in psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G S Owen
- Department of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, Western Education Centre, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
White DB, Evans LR, Bautista CA, Luce JM, Lo B. Are physicians' recommendations to limit life support beneficial or burdensome? Bringing empirical data to the debate. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 180:320-5. [PMID: 19498057 PMCID: PMC2731809 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776oc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2008] [Accepted: 06/02/2009] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Although there is a growing belief that physicians should routinely provide a recommendation to surrogates during deliberations about withdrawing life support, there is a paucity of empirical data on surrogates' perspectives on this topic. OBJECTIVES To understand the attitudes of surrogate decision-makers toward receiving a physician's recommendation during deliberations about whether to limit life support for an incapacitated patient. METHODS We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study among 169 surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients. Surrogates sequentially viewed two videos of simulated physician-surrogate discussions about whether to limit life support, which varied only by whether the physician gave a recommendation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The main quantitative outcome was whether surrogates preferred to receive a physicians' recommendation. Surrogates also participated in an in-depth, semistructured interview to explore the reasons for their preference. Fifty-six percent (95/169) of surrogates preferred to receive a recommendation, 42% (70/169) preferred not to receive a recommendation, and 2% (4/169) felt that both approaches were equally acceptable. We identified four main themes that explained surrogates' preferences, including surrogates' perceptions of physicians' appropriate role in life or death decisions and their perceptions of the positive or negative consequences of a recommendation on the physician-surrogate relationship, on the decision-making process, and on long-term regret for the family. CONCLUSIONS There is no consensus among surrogates about whether physicians should routinely provide a recommendation regarding life support decisions for incapacitated patients. These findings suggest that physicians should ask surrogates whether they wish to receive a recommendation regarding life support decisions and should be flexible in their approach to decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas B White
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Mental disorders and their care present unusual problems within biomedical ethics. The disorders themselves invite an ethical critique, as does society's attitude to them; researching the diagnosis and treatment of mental disorders also presents special ethical issues. The current high profile of mental disorder ethics, emphasised by recent political and legal developments, makes this a field of research that is not only important but also highly topical. For these reasons, the Wellcome Trust's biomedical ethics programme convened a meeting, "Investigating Ethics and Mental Disorders", in order to review some current research, and to stimulate topics and methods of future research in the field. The meeting was attended by policy makers, regulators, research funders, and researchers, including social scientists, psychiatrists, psychologists, lawyers, philosophers, criminologists, and others. As well as aiming to inspire a stronger research endeavour, the meeting also sought to stimulate an improved understanding of the methods and interactions that can contribute to "empirical ethics" generally. This paper reports on the meeting by describing contributions from individual speakers and discussion sections of the meeting. At the end we describe and discuss the conclusions of the meeting. As a result, the text is referenced less than would normally be expected in a review. Also, in summarising contributions from named presenters at the meeting it is possible that we have created inaccuracies; however, the definitive version of each paper, as provided directly by the presenter, is available at http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc.WTX025116.html.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Eastman
- Department of Mental Health, St George's University of London, Cramer Terrace, London.
| | | |
Collapse
|