1
|
Englbrecht JS, Schrader D, Kraus H, Schäfer M, Schedler D, Bach F, Soehle M. How Large is the Potential of Brain Dead Donors and what Prevents Utilization? A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis at Seven University Hospitals in North Rhine-Westphalia. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11186. [PMID: 37252613 PMCID: PMC10211426 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Organ donation after brain death is constantly lower in Germany compared to other countries. Instead, representative surveys show a positive attitude towards donation. Why this does not translate into more donations remains questionable. We retrospectively analyzed all potential brain dead donors treated in the university hospitals of Aachen, Bielefeld, Bonn, Essen, Düsseldorf, Cologne and Münster between June 2020 and July 2021. 300 potential brain dead donors were identified. Donation was utilized in 69 cases (23%). Refused consent (n = 190), and failed utilization despite consent (n = 41) were reasons for a donation not realized. Consent was significantly higher in potential donors with a known attitude towards donation (n = 94) compared to a decision by family members (n = 195) (49% vs. 33%, p = 0.012). The potential donor´s age, status of interviewer, and the timing of the interview with decision-makers had no influence on consent rates, and it was comparable between hospitals. Refused consent was the predominant reason for a donation not utilized. Consent rate was lower than in surveys, only a known attitude towards donation had a significant positive influence. This indicates that survey results do not translate well into everyday clinical practice and promoting a previously documented decision on organ donation is important.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Friedhelm Bach
- Protestant Hospital Bethel (EvKB), Bielefeld, Germany
- Medical School OWL, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Łuków P. The ethical significance of consent to postmortem organ retrieval. Bioethics 2023; 37:489-497. [PMID: 37082981 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.13161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Supporters of opt-in organ procurement policies typically claim that the absence of consent to postmortem transplantable organ retrieval is a normative barrier to such retrieval. On this ground, justification of opt-out policies is demanded. The paper shows that postmortem organ retrieval is normatively different from live organ removal, and so the doctrine of informed consent does not apply to it in the way it does in other types of cases. First, seen as the instrument of protection of autonomy or the right to self-determination, informed consent cannot be relied on in the case of dead persons; secondly, viewed as an instrument of annulment of harm or wrong to the dead (volenti non fit injuria), informed consent relies on indefensible accounts of posthumous harm or wrong. Postmortem organ retrieval in cases of absence of the decedent's consent and refusal is governed by other norms than those related to consent. Such norms include, among others, respectful treatment of human remains (such as those found in regulations of medicine, law enforcement, and research) and avoidance of inherently wrong contexts and purposes (such as killing for the purpose of organ retrieval or trade in the human body or its parts). It is concluded that the onus probandi is on the supporters of opt-in, rather than opt-out, policies of posthumous organ retrieval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paweł Łuków
- Faculty of Philosophy, University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Man Y, Wieland-Jorna Y, Torensma B, de Wit K, Francke AL, Oosterveld-Vlug MG, Verheij RA. Opt-In and Opt-Out Consent Procedures for the Reuse of Routinely Recorded Health Data in Scientific Research and Their Consequences for Consent Rate and Consent Bias: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42131. [PMID: 36853745 PMCID: PMC10015347 DOI: 10.2196/42131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific researchers who wish to reuse health data pertaining to individuals can obtain consent through an opt-in procedure or opt-out procedure. The choice of procedure may have consequences for the consent rate and representativeness of the study sample and the quality of the research, but these consequences are not well known. OBJECTIVE This review aimed to provide insight into the consequences for the consent rate and consent bias of the study sample of opt-in procedures versus opt-out procedures for the reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes. METHODS A systematic review was performed based on searches in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science Core Collection, and the Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently included studies based on predefined eligibility criteria and assessed whether the statistical methods used in the reviewed literature were appropriate for describing the differences between consenters and nonconsenters. Statistical pooling was conducted, and a description of the results was provided. RESULTS A total of 15 studies were included in this meta-analysis. Of the 15 studies, 13 (87%) implemented an opt-in procedure, 1 (7%) implemented an opt-out procedure, and 1 (7%) implemented both the procedures. The average weighted consent rate was 84% (60,800/72,418 among the studies that used an opt-in procedure and 96.8% (2384/2463) in the single study that used an opt-out procedure. In the single study that described both procedures, the consent rate was 21% in the opt-in group and 95.6% in the opt-out group. Opt-in procedures resulted in more consent bias compared with opt-out procedures. In studies with an opt-in procedure, consenting individuals were more likely to be males, had a higher level of education, higher income, and higher socioeconomic status. CONCLUSIONS Consent rates are generally lower when using an opt-in procedure compared with using an opt-out procedure. Furthermore, in studies with an opt-in procedure, participants are less representative of the study population. However, both the study populations and the way in which opt-in or opt-out procedures were organized varied widely between the studies, which makes it difficult to draw general conclusions regarding the desired balance between patient control over data and learning from health data. The reuse of routinely recorded health data for scientific research purposes may be hampered by administrative burdens and the risk of bias.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne de Man
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Wieland-Jorna
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Torensma
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Koos de Wit
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke L Francke
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Public and Occupational Health, Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Robert A Verheij
- Nivel, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Tranzo, School of Social Sciences and Behavioural Research, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu X, Zhao N, Zheng R. The effects of default nudges on promoting approval of welfare cuts: An exploration during COVID-19. Front Psychol 2023; 13:1038750. [PMID: 36710739 PMCID: PMC9874108 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1038750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The global COVID-19 pandemic has created significant financial and operational challenges for some businesses. As a result, temporary welfare benefit reduction may be a tough but future-oriented choice for both employers and employees. The present study examined whether default nudges can be used to promote employees' approval of welfare-cutting policy while avoiding negative attitudes. Two online surveys were conducted during the first pandemic wave in China (February 2020). In the first study (N = 310), the participants were presented with a hypothetical welfare-cutting policy that used either an opt-in approach or an opt-out approach. We aimed to investigate how their approval and attitudes were different between two conditions. The results showed that the employees in the opt-out condition were more likely to accept the welfare-cutting policy than those in the opt-in condition, while participants' attitudes toward the policy employing opt-out approach were as negative as that employing opt-in approach. Study 2 (N = 1,519) involved a replication of Study 1 with two additional improved opt-out approaches (opt-out education and opt-out transparency). Compared with the opt-in approach and standard opt-out approach, the opt-out education approach both increased policy support and improved attitudes toward the welfare-cutting policy. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Liu
- Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China,Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Rui Zheng,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee A, Tham J. Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis. New Bioeth 2022; 28:341-349. [PMID: 35802413 DOI: 10.1080/20502877.2022.2095714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
This paper looks at the ethics of opt-in vs. opt-out of organ donation as Scotland has transitioned its systems to promote greater organ availability. We first analyse studies that compare the donation rates in other regions due to such a system switch and find that organ increase is inconclusive and modest at best. This is due to a lack of explicit opt-out choices resulting in greater resistance and family override unless there are infrastructures and greater awareness to support such change. The paper then looks at the difference between informed consent of the opt-in vs. presumed consent in the opt-out approaches. Patient autonomy and dignity are better reflected with informed consent. Eighteen months have passed since the new organ donation policy has come into effect, this paper recommends more research into organ donors' psychological motivations to help governments and the healthcare profession obtain more organs for transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joseph Tham
- Bioethics, Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Auvinen E, Nieminen P, Pellinen J, Dillner J, Tarkkanen J, Virtanen A. Human papillomavirus self-sampling with mRNA testing benefits routine screening. Int J Cancer 2022; 151:1989-1996. [PMID: 35716139 PMCID: PMC9796070 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
High risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) based screening provides the possibility of vaginal self-sampling as a tool to increase screening attendance. In order to evaluate the impact and feasibility of opt-in self-sampling in the Finnish setting, we invited a randomized population of 5350 women not attending screening after age group invitation or after reminder, to attend HPV self-sampling-based screening in the autumn of 2018 in Helsinki. Out of those, 1282 (24.0%) expressed their interest and ordered the sampling package. Eventually 787 women (14.7% of the total invited population) took part in screening, 770 women by providing a vaginal sample within 2 months from invitation and 17 by providing a pap smear in the laboratory. Self-taken samples were collected in Aptima Multitest vials and tested using the Aptima HPV mRNA assay. A high proportion, 158/770 (20.5%) of the samples were positive in the Aptima HPV assay. One hundred and forty-one samples were further submitted to Aptima HPV Genotyping and extended genotyping by a Luminex based assay. Of those, 23 samples (16.3%) were HPV 16 positive and 7 (5.0%) were positive for HPV 18/45; extended genotyping revealed multiple high-risk and low-risk HPV genotypes. At follow-up seven cases of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) were diagnosed, which represents 4.4% of HPV positive women and 0.9% of screened women, whereas the rate was 0.5% in routine screening. Our findings suggest that self-sampling with HPV mRNA testing is a feasible approach to improve screening efficacy in a high-risk population among original nonattendees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eeva Auvinen
- Department of VirologyHelsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of Helsinki and HUSHelsinkiFinland
| | - Pekka Nieminen
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyHelsinki University Hospital and University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | | | - Joakim Dillner
- Center for Cervical Cancer Prevention, Department of PathologyKarolinska University Laboratory and Karolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
| | - Jussi Tarkkanen
- Department of PathologyHelsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| | - Anni Virtanen
- Department of PathologyHelsinki University Hospital Diagnostic Center and University of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Conway PT. Media Analysis of the Canadian Deemed Consent Policy: Valuable Insights? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1575-1576. [PMID: 36288930 PMCID: PMC9718042 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.11270922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T. Conway
- American Association of Kidney Patients, Falls Church, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fox DE, Donald M, Chong C, Quinn RR, Ronksley PE, Elliott MJ, Lam NN. A Qualitative Content Analysis of Comments on Press Articles on Deemed Consent for Organ Donation in Canada. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2022; 17:1656-1664. [PMID: 36288931 PMCID: PMC9718046 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04340422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In 2019, two Canadian provinces became the first jurisdictions in North America to pass deemed consent legislation to increase deceased organ donation and transplantation rates. We sought to explore the perspectives of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada from the viewpoint of individuals commenting on press articles. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS In this qualitative descriptive study, we extracted public comments regarding deemed consent from online articles published by four major Canadian news outlets between January 2019 and July 2020. A total of 4357 comments were extracted from 35 eligible news articles. Comments were independently analyzed by two research team members using a conventional content analysis approach. RESULTS Commenters' perceptions of the deemed consent legislation for organ donation in Canada predominantly fit within three organizational groups: perceived positive implications of the bills, perceived negative implications of the bills, and key considerations. Three themes emerged within each group that summarized perspectives of the proposed legislation. Themes regarding the perceived positive implications of the bills included majority rules, societal effect, and prioritizing donation. Themes regarding the perceived negative implications of the bills were a right to choose, the potential for abuse and errors, and a possible slippery slope. Improving government transparency and communication, clarifying questions and addressing concerns, and providing evidence for the bills were identified as key considerations. CONCLUSIONS If deemed consent legislation is meant to increase organ donation and transplantation, addressing public concerns will be important to ensure successful implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle E. Fox
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Maoliosa Donald
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christy Chong
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robert R. Quinn
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Paul E. Ronksley
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Meghan J. Elliott
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ngan N. Lam
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Stoffel ST, Bombagi M, Kerrison RS, von Wagner C, Herrmann B. Testing Enhanced Active Choice to Optimize Acceptance and Participation in a Population-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in Malta. Behav Med 2022; 48:141-146. [PMID: 33710942 DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2020.1828254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Opt-out strategies have been shown to improve participation in cancer screening; however, there are ethical concerns regarding the presumed consent. In this study, we tested an alternative opt-in strategy, called: "enhanced active choice," in which the response options summarize the consequences of the decision. The study was conducted as part of the Maltese colorectal cancer screening program, which offers men and women, aged 60-64, a "one-off" fecal immunochemical test (FIT). A total of 8349 individuals were randomly assigned to receive either an invitation letter that featured a standard opt-in strategy (control condition), or an alternative letter with a modified opt-in strategy (enhanced active choice condition). Our primary outcome was participation three months after the invitation was delivered. Additionally, we also compared the proportion who said they wanted to take part in screening. We used multivariable logistic regression for the analysis. Overall, 48.4% (N = 4042) accepted the invitation and 42.4% (N = 3542) did the screening test. While there were no statistically significant differences between the two conditions in terms of acceptance and participation, enhanced active choice did increase acceptance among men by 4.6 percentage points, which translated to a significant increase in participation of 3.4 percentage points. We conclude that enhanced active choice can improve male screening participation. Given the higher risk of CRC in men, as well as their lower participation screening, we believe this to be an important finding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro T Stoffel
- Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy.,Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.,Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Robert S Kerrison
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
This paper argues that there is little difference between opt-in and opt-out organ donation systems for increasing donor numbers when used in isolation. Independently diverting to an opt-out system confers no obvious advantage and can harm efforts to bolster donations. Rather, it is essential to address barriers to organ donation on several levels along with a switch in system. Moreover, for many countries, it may be more beneficial to adequately capacitate the donation system already in place, rather than entertain a significant change with its attendant resource requirements. For decades, the international transplant community has been involved in vigorous debate as to the merits of moving from default opt-in systems to opt-out policies to grow organ donor numbers and better meet the ever-increasing demand for lifesaving transplants. Opt-out is certainly en vogue, with Wales, England and Nova Scotia recently switching over, Scotland due to become opt-out in March 2021 and Northern Ireland and Canada seriously considering a similar move. Thanks to several countries making the switch from opt-in to opt-out over the last 20-30 years, there are sets of robust longitudinal data that aid in analysing the efficacy of donation systems. However, these data are often contradictory and largely inconclusive, suggesting other factors may be in play. This paper reviews some emerging trends in opt-in versus opt-out organ donation policies and considers recent data that elucidates some of the main contentions across each. Ethical frameworks underpinning donation systems, such as informed consent, trust and transparency, are discussed in detail. Substantial time is also devoted to opt-in vs opt-out systems in developing countries, which tend to be excluded from many analyses, and where the challenges faced are magnified by socio-economic constraints. This constitutes a major gap in recently published literature, as developing countries often lag far behind their developed counterparts in donor and transplant numbers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet Rosanne Etheredge
- Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Henshall C, Potts J, Walker S, Hancock M, Underwood M, Broughton N, Ede R, Kernot C, O’Neill L, Geddes JR, Cipriani A. Informing National Health Service patients about participation in
clinical research: A comparison of opt-in and opt-out approaches across the
United Kingdom. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2021; 55:400-408. [PMID: 33225713 PMCID: PMC8020308 DOI: 10.1177/0004867420973261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recruitment to clinical research in the National Health Service remains challenging. One barrier is accessing patients to discuss research participation. Two general approaches are used in the United Kingdom to facilitate this: an 'opt-in' approach (when clinicians communicate research opportunities to patients) and an 'opt-out' approach (all patients have the right to be informed of relevant research opportunities). No evidence-based data are available, however, to inform the decision about which approach is preferable. This study aimed to collect information from 'opt-in' and 'opt-out' Trusts and identify which of the two approaches is optimal for ensuring National Health Service patients are given opportunities to discuss research participation. METHOD This sequential mixed methods study comprised three phases: (1) an Appreciative Inquiry across UK Trusts, (2) online surveys and (3) focus groups with National Health Service staff and patients at a representative mental health Trust. RESULTS The study was conducted between June and October 2019. Out of seven National Health Service Mental Health Trusts contacted (three 'opt-out' and four 'opt-in'), only four took part in phase 1 of the study and three of them were 'opt-out' Trusts. Benefits of an 'opt-out' approach included greater inclusivity of patients and the removal of research gatekeepers, while the involvement of research-active clinicians and established patient-clinician relationships were cited as important to 'opt-in' success. Phases 2 and 3 were conducted at a different Trust (Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust) which was using an 'opt-in' approach. Of 333 staff and member survey responders, 267 (80.2%) favoured moving to an 'opt-out' approach (phase 2). Nineteen staff and 16 patients and carers participated in focus groups (phase 3). Concern was raised by staff regarding the lack of time for clinical research, with clinical work taking precedence over research; patients were concerned about a lack of research activity; all considered research to be beneficial and were supportive of a move to 'opt-out'. CONCLUSION Findings suggest that 'opt-out' is more beneficial than 'opt-in', with the potential to vastly increase patient access to research opportunities and to enable greater equality of information provision for currently marginalised groups. This should ensure that healthcare research is more representative of the entire population, including those with a mental health diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Henshall
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences,
Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK,Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer Potts
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Sophie Walker
- Department of Psychiatry, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Hancock
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Underwood
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Nick Broughton
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Roger Ede
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine Kernot
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Lorcan O’Neill
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - John R Geddes
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK,Department of Psychiatry, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Andrea Cipriani
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust,
Warneford Hospital, Oxford, UK,Department of Psychiatry, University of
Oxford, Oxford, UK,Andrea Cipriani, Department of Psychiatry,
University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital, Oxford OX3 7JX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
den Hartogh G. Respect for autonomy in systems of postmortem organ procurement: A comment. Bioethics 2019; 33:550-556. [PMID: 30681169 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In 2015 Robert Veatch published the second edition of his Transplantation ethics, this time together with Lainie Ross. The chapters on postmortem organ procurement distinguish between 'giving' and 'taking' systems, and argue that 'taking' systems may promise a greater yield of organs for transplantation, but inevitably violate a requirement of respect for the deceased's autonomy. That argument has been very influential, and is also representative of a way of thinking that is widespread in the literature and in public debate. In this paper I contend that it is conceptually flawed in a number of important respects. These concern the understanding of both the concept of 'consent' and the requirement of respect for autonomy, the role of the relatives in any procurement system, and the factors that actually determine the extent to which a system respects autonomy, under any interpretation of that requirement.
Collapse
|
13
|
Thornton V. Lives and choices, give and take: Altruism and organ procurement. Nurs Ethics 2017; 26:587-597. [PMID: 28745573 DOI: 10.1177/0969733017710985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In 2015, Wales introduced a deemed consent: soft opt-out system for organ procurement in order to address the chronic shortage of organs for transplant. Early statistical evidence suggests that this has had a positive impact on cadaveric organ donation. Such a system for procurement has previously been dismissed by the Organ Donation Taskforce, who suggested that opting out could potentially undermine the concept of donated organs as gifts and this could then negatively impact the number of organs offered for transplant. Considerable weight was placed upon the need to retain the altruistic gift element associated with an opt-in system. This article will consider the role of altruism in an organ procurement policy. A broad utilitarian approach will be taken when putting forward the arguments in favour of adopting a weak altruism position in a soft opt-out system for procurement with a combined registry.
Collapse
|
14
|
Etheredge H, Penn C, Watermeyer J. Opt-in or opt-out to increase organ donation in South Africa? Appraising proposed strategies using an empirical ethics analysis. Dev World Bioeth 2017; 18:119-125. [PMID: 28508541 DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Utilising empirical ethics analysis, we evaluate the merits of systems proposed to increase deceased organ donation in South Africa (SA). We conclude that SA should maintain its soft opt-in policy, and enhance it with 'required transplant referral' in order to maximise donor numbers within an ethically and legally acceptable framework. In SA, as is the case worldwide, the demand for donor organs far exceeds the supply thereof. Currently utilising a soft opt-in system, SA faces the challenge of how to increase donor numbers in a context which is imbued with inequalities in access to healthcare, multiplicitous personal beliefs and practices, distrust of organ transplant and varying levels of education and health literacy. We argue that a hard opt-in, opt-out or mandated consent system would be problematic, and we present empirical data from Gauteng Province illustrating barriers to ethically sound practice in soft consent systems. Ultimately, we argue that in spite of some limitations, a soft opt-in system is most realistic for SA because its implementation does not require extensive public education campaigns at national level, and it does not threaten to further erode trust at a clinical level. However, to circumvent some of the clinical-level barriers identified in our empirical study, we propose a contextually sensitive option for "enabling" soft opt-in through "required transplant referral". We argue that this system is legally defensible, enhances ethical practice and could also increase donor numbers as it has in many other countries.
Collapse
|
15
|
Henriquez-Camacho C, Villafuerte-Gutierrez P, Pérez-Molina JA, Losa J, Gotuzzo E, Cheyne N. Opt-out screening strategy for HIV infection among patients attending emergency departments: systematic review and meta-analysis. HIV Med 2016; 18:419-429. [PMID: 28000338 DOI: 10.1111/hiv.12474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES International health agencies have promoted nontargeted universal (opt-out) HIV screening tests in different settings, including emergency departments (EDs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the testing uptake of strategies (opt-in targeted, opt-in nontargeted and opt-out) to detect new cases of HIV infection in EDs. METHODS We searched the Pubmed and Embase databases, from 1984 to April 2015, for opt-in and opt-out HIV diagnostic strategies used in EDs. Randomized controlled or quasi experimental studies were included. We assessed the percentage of positive individuals tested for HIV infection in each programme (opt-in and opt-out strategies). The mean percentage was estimated by combining studies in a random-effect meta-analysis. The percentages of individuals tested in the programmes were compared in a random-effect meta-regression model. Data were analysed using stata version 12. Quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS Of the 90 papers identified, 28 were eligible for inclusion. Eight trials used opt-out, 18 trials used opt-in, and two trials used both to detect new cases of HIV infection. The test was accepted and taken by 75 155 of 172 237 patients (44%) in the opt-out strategy, and 73 581 of 382 992 patients (19%) in the opt-in strategy. The prevalence of HIV infection detected by the opt-out strategy was 0.40% (373 cases), that detected by the opt-in nontargeted strategy was 0.52% (419 cases), and that detected by the opt-in targeted strategy was 1.06% (52 cases). CONCLUSIONS In this meta-analysis, the testing uptake of the opt-out strategy was not different from that of the opt-in strategy to detect new cases of HIV infection in EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Henriquez-Camacho
- Infectious Diseases Department, Internal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - J A Pérez-Molina
- National Referral Centre for Tropical Diseases, Infectious Diseases Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Losa
- Infectious Diseases Department, Internal Medicine Unit, Hospital Universitario Fundacion Alcorcon, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Gotuzzo
- Alexander von Humboldt Tropical Medicine Institute, Lima, Peru
| | - N Cheyne
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ahmad G, Iftikhar S. An Analysis of Organ Donation Policy in the United States. RHODE ISLAND MEDICAL JOURNAL (2013) 2016; 99:25-27. [PMID: 27128513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
There is currently an organ shortage crisis in the United States. This paper analyzes the magnitude of the problem, the organ procurement programs in other developed countries as compared to the US, and discusses the changes that can be made to address this problem. With the opt-in or explicit-consent method currently practiced in the US, less that one third of the population consents to organ donation. In order to narrow the gap between the demand and supply of organs, steps need to be taken to improve the organ procurement infrastructure. The public needs to be educated about the dire need, the benefits and risks in organ donation, and living vs. deceased donation. [Full article available at http://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2016-05.asp, free with no login].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sadia Iftikhar
- Clinical Assistant Professor of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shaikh RA, Simonsen KA, O'Keefe A, Earley M, Foxall M, Islam KM, Person A, Boyle C, Sandkovsky U, Margalit R. Comparison of Opt-In Versus Opt-Out Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Inmates in a County Jail. J Correct Health Care 2015; 21:408-16. [PMID: 26285597 DOI: 10.1177/1078345815600447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
A majority of jails in the United States rely on an opt-in (voluntary) rather than opt-out (universal) approach to testing for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This study compares an opt-out approach at intake to opt-in testing during incarceration and estimates the prevalence of common STIs among jail inmates. Data derive from a universal intake pilot testing program (n = 298) and an established, student-led voluntary testing program (n = 1,963), respectively. The adjusted prevalence as well as the odds of testing positive for chlamydia were significantly higher in the opt-out program (p = .025 and .008, respectively) than the opt-in program but not for gonorrhea (p = .402 and .300, respectively). These results demonstrate the potential public health benefit of implementation of universal STI testing of jail inmates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raees A Shaikh
- Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Kari A Simonsen
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Anne O'Keefe
- Douglas County Health Department, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Mary Earley
- Douglas County Department of Corrections, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Mark Foxall
- Douglas County Department of Corrections, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - K M Islam
- Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Austin Person
- College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Cole Boyle
- Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Uriel Sandkovsky
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Ruth Margalit
- Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yeh S, Mink C, Kim M, Naylor S, Zangwill KM, Allred NJ. Effectiveness of hospital-based postpartum procedures on pertussis vaccination among postpartum women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:237.e1-6. [PMID: 24096180 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2013] [Revised: 08/28/2013] [Accepted: 09/27/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Pertussis causes significant morbidity among adults, children, and especially infants. Since 2006, pertussis vaccination has been recommended for women after delivery. We conducted a prospective, controlled evaluation of in-hospital postpartum pertussis vaccination of birth mothers from October 2009 through July 2010 to evaluate the effectiveness of hospital-based procedures in increasing postpartum vaccination. STUDY DESIGN The intervention and comparison hospitals are private community facilities, each with 2000-6000 births/year. At the intervention hospital, physician opt-in orders for tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) before discharge were implemented in November 2009, followed by standing orders in February 2010. The comparison hospital maintained standard practice. Randomly selected hospital charts of women after delivery were reviewed for receipt of Tdap and demographic data. We evaluated postpartum Tdap vaccination rates and conducted multivariate analyses to evaluate characteristics that are associated with vaccination. We reviewed 1264 charts (658 intervention hospital; 606 comparison hospital) from women with completed deliveries. RESULTS Tdap postpartum vaccination was 0% at both hospitals at baseline. In the intervention hospital, the introduction of the opt-in order was followed by an increase in postpartum vaccination to 18%. The introduction of the standing order approach was followed by a further increase to 69% (P < .0001). No postpartum Tdap vaccinations were documented in the comparison hospital. Postpartum Tdap vaccination in the intervention hospital did not differ by demographic characteristics. CONCLUSION In-hospital ordering procedures substantially increased Tdap vaccination coverage in women after delivery. Opt-in orders increased coverage that increased substantially with standing orders.
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
In Australia, general sentiment towards organ donation is somewhat positive, but actual donation rates languish amongst the poorest in the western world. Even for registered organ donors, the Australian system mandates obtaining family consent for posthumous donation; making non-donation the default option. A telephone survey in Central Queensland, Australia (n=1289), investigated people's confidence regarding their decision on whether to donate organs of a deceased family member; whether or not they had discussed donation with their family; and their support for an opt-out (presumed consent) system of donation. In accord with our expectations, each of these factors independently predicted the wishes of respondents to donate their own organs. The results suggest that promoting organ donation as the default option may improve rates of public acceptance for organ donations and consequently save lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Rockloff
- a Institute for Health and Social Science Research, Central Queensland University , Bundaberg , Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
In a paper in the last issue of Clinical Medicine, some of the background to attitudes to newly dead bodies, the current context of an urgent need for organs for transplant and the objections to calling a proposal to address this 'presumed consent' were outlined. Here further concerns are explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Saunders
- Centre for Philosophy, History and Law in Healthcare, School of Health Science, University of Swansea.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Highland Clinical Psychology Service for Children and Young People, faced with excessive waiting lists, a large geographical remit, and only three psychologists, sought to change waiting list management to improve services. METHOD An opt-in appointment system and outcome research were used to inform waiting list management. Referrals with the characteristics of cases where psychological interventions are helpful were prioritised over cases that had characteristics of poor outcomes. RESULTS Attendance at first appointments was significantly increased and waiting times were significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS The success of the opt-in system replicated research in other CAMHS. It is also hypothesised that the new waiting list prioritisation criteria had an effect, although this needs further research. Issues associated with the change in waiting list prioritisation are discussed and it is suggested that prioritising treatable cases over complex cases is an appropriate, effective and ethical use of scarce resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E Woodhouse
- Clinical Psychology Service for Children and Young People, NHS Highland, The Alligin Centre, Larch House, Stoneyfield, Inverness IV2 7PA, Scotland. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|