1
|
Rozario SY, Sarkar M, Farlie MK, Lazarus MD. Responding to the healthcare workforce shortage: A scoping review exploring anatomical pathologists' professional identities over time. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2024; 17:351-365. [PMID: 36748328 DOI: 10.1002/ase.2260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Anatomical pathology (AP) is an anatomy-centric medical specialty devoted to tissue-based diagnosis of disease. The field faces a current and predicted workforce shortage, likely increasing diagnostic wait times and delaying patient access to urgent treatment. A lack of AP exposure is proposed to preclude recruitment to the field, as medical students are afforded only a limited understanding of who a pathologist is and what they do (their professional identity/PI and role). Anatomical sciences educators may be well placed to increase student understanding of anatomical pathologists' PI features, but until features of anatomical pathologists' PI are understood, recommendations for anatomy educators are premature. Thus, this scoping review asked: "What are the professional identity features of anatomical pathologists reported in the literature, and how have these changed over time?" A six-stage scoping review was performed. Medline and PubMed, Global Health, and Embase were used to identify relevant studies (n = 74). Team-based framework analysis identified that features of anatomical pathologists' professional identity encompass five overarching themes: professional practice, views about the role, training and education, personal implications, and technology. Technology was identified as an important theme of anatomical pathologists' PI, as it intersected with many other PI feature themes, including diagnosis and collaboration. This review found that pathologists may sometimes perceive professional competition with technology, such as artificial intelligence. These findings suggest unique opportunities for integrating AP-specific PI features into anatomy teaching, which may foster student interest in AP, and potentially increase recruitment into the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shemona Y Rozario
- Centre for Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mahbub Sarkar
- Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie K Farlie
- Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle D Lazarus
- Centre for Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Haspel RL, Jones JL, Rizvi H, Young M. Development of a Validated Exam to Assess Pathologist Knowledge of Genomic Oncology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:453-456. [PMID: 32882001 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0038-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— There is a clear need to educate health professionals in genomic medicine. Pathologists, given their critical role in cancer diagnostics, must understand core concepts in genomic oncology. Although high-quality evaluation is a cornerstone of medical education, to our knowledge a rigorously validated genomic oncology assessment tool has not been published. OBJECTIVE.— To develop and validate a genomic oncology exam. DESIGN.— A previously developed exam was updated and validated using 3 approaches: pretesting/posttesting in relation to a live genomic pathology workshop; comparison of scores of individuals at a priori defined knowledge levels; and use of Rasch analysis. This last approach is used in high-stakes testing, such as licensing exams. The exam included both knowledge-based as well as skills-based questions related to the use of online genomics tools. RESULTS.— There was a significant difference in exam scores preworkshop and postworkshop (37.5% to 75%; P < .001). Individuals at a priori defined beginner, intermediate, and expert levels scored 35%, 58%, and 89%, respectively (P < .001). Rasch analysis demonstrated excellent fit and reliability and led to further exam refinement with the removal of 2 questions deemed unnecessary for assessment. CONCLUSIONS.— A rigorously validated exam has now been created to assess pathologist genomic oncology knowledge and skills. The exam can be used to assess both individual learners as well as educational interventions. The exam may also be applicable to other specialties involved in genomic-based cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard L Haspel
- From the Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Haspel)
| | - J Louise Jones
- The Centre for Tumour Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, United Kingdom (Jones)
| | - Hasan Rizvi
- The Department of Pathology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (Rizvi)
| | - Martin Young
- The Department of Cellular Pathology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom (Young)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pisapia P, Pepe F, Iaccarino A, Sgariglia R, Nacchio M, Conticelli F, Salatiello M, Tufano R, Russo G, Gragnano G, Girolami I, Eccher A, Malapelle U, Troncone G. Next Generation Sequencing in Cytopathology: Focus on Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:633923. [PMID: 33644101 PMCID: PMC7904874 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.633923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular cytopathology is a rapidly evolving field embracing both conventional microscopy and molecular pathology. Its growing popularity stems from the fact that in many types of advanced cancers, including non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), cytological samples often constitute the only available specimens for morphomolecular analysis. Indeed, non formalin fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) cytological samples feature a higher quality of extracted nucleic acids than histological specimens. However, because of the growing complexity of molecular testing, several efforts should be made to validate the analytical performance of the wide array of currently available molecular technologies, including next generation sequencing (NGS). This technology has the terrific advantage of allowing simultaneous detection of scores of predictive biomarkers even in low-input DNA/RNA specimens. Here, we briefly review the role of the modern cytopathologist in the morphomolecular diagnosing of advanced stage NSCLC and the adoption of NGS in conventional cytopreparations (cell blocks, direct smears, and liquid-based cytology) and supernatants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Pisapia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Pepe
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Antonino Iaccarino
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta Sgariglia
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Mariantonia Nacchio
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Floriana Conticelli
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria Salatiello
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Russo
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluca Gragnano
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Ilaria Girolami
- Division of Pathology, Central Hospital Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy
| | - Albino Eccher
- Department of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Umberto Malapelle
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Troncone
- Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Arends MJ, Salto‐Tellez M. Low-contact and high-interconnectivity pathology (LC&HI Path): post-COVID19-pandemic practice of pathology. Histopathology 2020; 77:518-524. [PMID: 32516836 PMCID: PMC7300838 DOI: 10.1111/his.14174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic situation may be viewed as an opportunity to accelerate some of the ongoing transformations in modern pathology. This refers primarily to the digitalisation of the practice of tissue and cellular pathology diagnostics. However, it is also an opportunity to analyse the modus operandi of a discipline that has been practised in a similar manner for more than 100 years. The challenge is to define the next generation of interconnectivity tools that would be necessary to achieve a new operational model that, while ensuring low face-to-face interaction between the main players of the diagnostic pipeline, allows maximum interconnectivity to serve our patients and the immediate teaching and research needs associated with clinical tissue/cellular samples. This viewpoint aims to describe what this new paradigm, a low-contact and high-interconnectivity pathology (LC&HC Path) operation, may require in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark J Arends
- Division of CancerUniversity of EdinburghCancer Research UK Edinburgh CentreIGMMWestern General Hospital CampusEdinburghUK
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Precision Medicine Centre of ExcellenceCentre for Cancer Research and Cell BiologyQueen's University BelfastBelfastUK
- Cellular PathologyBelfast Health and Social Care TrustBelfastUK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Li Y, Kuang Y, Jia Y, Bai S. Diagnostic value of NSE factor combined with ultrasound hemodynamic indexes in cervical lymph node metastasis of lung cancer. Oncol Lett 2020; 20:699-704. [PMID: 32565995 PMCID: PMC7285818 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2020.11621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) factor combined with ultrasound hemodynamic parameters in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of lung cancer was explored. The clinical data of 85 patients with lung cancer, admitted to Qingdao Municipal Hospital (Group) from January 2015 to December 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. According to the results of pathological examination, 47 patients with cervical lymph node metastasis were enrolled in the metastatic group and 38 patients without lymph node metastasis were enrolled in the non-metastatic group. The expression level of NSE in serum and the hemodynamic indicators of blood flow resistance index (RI) and pulsatility index (PI) were compared between the two groups. ROC curve analysis was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of NSE, RI, PI, and their combination in lymph node metastasis of lung cancer. The NSE, RI and PI indexes in the metastatic group were significantly higher than those in the non-metastatic group (P<0.05). The sensitivity and specificity of NSE in the diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of lung cancer were 73.68 and 72.34%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of RI were 78.95 and 80.85%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of PI were 81.58 and 68.09%, respectively. Also, the sensitivity and specificity of NSE combined with RI were 89.47 and 61.70%, respectively, and the diagnostic AUC was 0.881. The sensitivity and specificity of NSE combined with PI were 92.11 and 74.47%, respectively, and the diagnostic AUC was 0.905. NSE, RI, and PI have certain diagnostic value for cervical lymph node metastasis of lung cancer, however, the combined diagnosis is more valuable, and can be used as the auxiliary diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis of lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yansong Li
- Department of Ultrasound, Qingdao Municipal Hospital (Group), Qingdao, Shandong 266011, P.R. China
| | - Yong Kuang
- Department of Physical Diagnostics, Qingdao Ninth People's Hospital, Qingdao Municipal Hospital (Group), Qingdao, Shandong 266002, P.R. China
| | - Yanzhen Jia
- Department of Physical Diagnostics, Qingdao Ninth People's Hospital, Qingdao Municipal Hospital (Group), Qingdao, Shandong 266002, P.R. China
| | - Shufang Bai
- Department of Ultrasound, The People's Hospital of Zhangqiu Area, Jinan, Shandong 250200, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Macklin PS, Pillay N, Lee JL, Pitman H, Scott S, Wang J, Craig C, Jones JL, Oien KA, Colling R, Coupland SE, Verrill C. CM-Path Molecular Diagnostics Forum-consensus statement on the development and implementation of molecular diagnostic tests in the United Kingdom. Br J Cancer 2019; 121:738-743. [PMID: 31575975 PMCID: PMC6889373 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-019-0588-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pathology has evolved from a purely morphological description of cellular alterations in disease to our current ability to interrogate tissues with multiple 'omics' technologies. By utilising these techniques and others, 'molecular diagnostics' acts as the cornerstone of precision/personalised medicine by attempting to match the underlying disease mechanisms to the most appropriate targeted therapy. METHODS Despite the promises of molecular diagnostics, significant barriers have impeded its widespread clinical adoption. Thus, the National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) Cellular Molecular Pathology (CM-Path) initiative convened a national Molecular Diagnostics Forum to facilitate closer collaboration between clinicians, academia, industry, regulators and other key stakeholders in an attempt to overcome these. RESULTS We agreed on a consensus 'roadmap' that should be followed during development and implementation of new molecular diagnostic tests. We identified key barriers to efficient implementation and propose possible solutions to these. In addition, we discussed the recent reconfiguration of molecular diagnostic services in NHS England and its likely impacts. CONCLUSIONS We anticipate that this consensus statement will provide practical advice to those involved in the development of novel molecular diagnostic tests. Although primarily focusing on test adoption within the United Kingdom, we also refer to international guidelines to maximise the applicability of our recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip S Macklin
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| | | | - Jessica L Lee
- Strategy and Initiatives, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Helen Pitman
- CM-Path Programme Manager, National Cancer Research Institute, London, UK
| | - Sophie Scott
- Medical Science Liaison (Europe), Guardant Health, London, UK
| | - Jayson Wang
- Molecular Pathology Lead, Department of Cellular Pathology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - J Louise Jones
- Genomics England, London, UK
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Karin A Oien
- Department of Pathology, The Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK
| | - Richard Colling
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah E Coupland
- North West Cancer Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salto-Tellez M, Cree IA. Cancer taxonomy: pathology beyond pathology. Eur J Cancer 2019; 115:57-60. [PMID: 31108243 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
The way we categorise and classify cancer types dictates not only the way we diagnose and treat patients but also many of our decisions on biomarker and drug development. In addition, cancer taxonomy proves the ground truth for future discoveries in the area of computational pathology and artificial intelligence. This editorial comment illustrates the relevance of cancer taxonomy in clinical and morphomolecular diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic prediction; it shows its importance in identifying the epidemiology, aetiology and pathogenesis in oncology and explains its determinant role in computational tissue-based cancer diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
| | - Ian A Cree
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health Organization (WHO), Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barnett D, Hall J, Haab B. Automated Identification and Quantification of Signals in Multichannel Immunofluorescence Images: The SignalFinder-IF Platform. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY 2019; 189:1402-1412. [PMID: 31026417 PMCID: PMC6616976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Multimarker fluorescence analysis of tissue specimens offers the opportunity to probe the expression levels and locations of multiple markers in a single sample. Software is needed to fully capitalize on the advantages of this technology for sensitive, quantitative, and multiplexed data collection. A major challenge has been the automated identification and quantification of signals. We report on the software SignalFinder-IF, which meets that need. SignalFinder-IF uses a newly developed algorithm called Segment-Fit Thresholding, which showed robust performance for automated signal identification in side-by-side comparisons with several current methods. Two utilities provided with SignalFinder-IF enable downstream analyses. The first allows the quantification and mapping of relationships between an unlimited number of markers through user-defined sequences of AND, OR, and NOT operators. The second produces composite pictures of the signals or colocalization analysis on brightfield hematoxylin and eosin images, which is useful for understanding the morphologies and locations of cells meeting specific marker criteria. SignalFinder-IF enables high-throughput, rigorous analyses of whole-slide, multimarker data, and it promises to open new possibilities in many research and clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Barnett
- Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Johnathan Hall
- Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Brian Haab
- Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brockmoeller S, Young C, Lee J, Arends MJ, Wilkins BS, Thomas GJ, Oien KA, Jones L, Hunter KD. Survey of UK histopathology consultants' attitudes towards academic and molecular pathology. J Clin Pathol 2019; 72:399-405. [PMID: 30910824 PMCID: PMC6580784 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2018-205568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Academic pathology is facing a crisis; an ongoing decline in academic pathology posts, a paucity of academic pathologist's in-training and unfilled posts at a time when cellular pathology departments are challenged to deliver increasing numbers of molecular tests. The National Cancer Research Institute initiative in Cellular & Molecular Pathology commissioned a survey to assess attitudes of cellular pathology consultants towards research in order to understand barriers and identify possible solutions to improve this situation. As cellular pathology is encompassing an increasing number of diagnostic molecular tests, we also surveyed the current approach to and extent of training in molecular pathology. METHODS The survey was distributed to all UK-based consultant pathologists via the Pathological Society of Great Britain & Ireland and Royal College of Pathologist networks. Heads of Department were contacted separately to obtain figures for number of academic training and consultant posts. RESULTS 302 cellular pathologists completed the survey which represents approximately 21% of the total cellular histopathology workforce. Most respondents (89%) had been involved in research at some point; currently, 22% were undertaking research formally, and 41% on an informal basis. Of those previously involved in research, 57% stopped early in their consultant career. The majority of substantive academic posts were Professors of which 60% had been in post for >20 years. Most respondents (84%) used molecular pathology in diagnostic work, independent of where they worked or the length of time in post. Notably, 53% of consultants had not received molecular pathology training, particularly more senior consultants and consultants in district general hospitals. CONCLUSIONS The survey reveals that the academic workforce is skewed towards senior individuals, many of whom are approaching retirement, with a missing cohort of 'junior consultant' academic pathologists to replace them. Most pathologists stop formal research activity at the beginning of a consultant career. While molecular pathology is an increasing part of a pathologist's workload, the majority of consultant cellular pathologists have not received any formal molecular training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlet Brockmoeller
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James, Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, Leeds, UK
| | - Caroline Young
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James, Pathology and Data Analytics, Leeds Institute of Cancer & Pathology, Leeds, UK
| | | | | | - Bridget S Wilkins
- St Thomas' Hospital London and Royal Hampshire Country Hospital, Winchester, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth J Thomas
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southhampton, UK
| | - Karin A Oien
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Keith D Hunter
- Academic Unit of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Pathology and Surgery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Significant advances in genomics and molecular genetics in recent years have reshaped the practice of endocrine pathology. Pan-genomic studies, including the pioneering ones on papillary thyroid carcinoma, phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma, and adrenal cortical carcinoma from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, provided a comprehensive integrated genomic analysis of endocrine tumors into distinct molecularly defined subtypes. Better understanding of the molecular landscape and more accurate definition of biological behavior has been accordingly achieved. Nevertheless, how any of these advances are translated into routine practice still remains a challenge in the era of precision medicine. The challenge for modern pathology is to keep up the pace with scientific discoveries by integrating novel concepts in tumor classification, molecular genetics, prognostication, and theranostics. As an example, pathology plays a role in the identification of hereditary disease, while it offers the tools for complementing molecular genetics, for example, validation of variants of unknown significance deriving from targeted sequencing or whole exome/genome sequencing approach. Immunohistochemistry has arisen as a cost-effective strategy in the evaluation either of somatic mutations in tumors and/or germline mutations in patients with familial cancer syndromes. Herein, a comprehensive review focusing on novel and emerging biomarkers is presented in order pathologists and other endocrine-related specialists to remain updated and become aware of potential pitfalls and limitations in the field of endocrine pathology.
Collapse
|
11
|
Robinson M, James J, Thomas G, West N, Jones L, Lee J, Oien K, Freeman A, Craig C, Sloan P, Elliot P, Cheang M, Rodriguez‐Justo M, Verrill C. Quality assurance guidance for scoring and reporting for pathologists and laboratories undertaking clinical trial work. J Pathol Clin Res 2019; 5:91-99. [PMID: 30407751 PMCID: PMC6463860 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
While pathologists have always played a pivotal role in clinical trials ensuring accurate diagnosis and staging, pathology data from prognostic and predictive tests are increasingly being used to enrol, stratify and randomise patients to experimental treatments. The use of pathological parameters as primary and secondary outcome measures, either as standalone classifiers or in combination with clinical data, is also becoming more common. Moreover, reporting of estimates of residual disease, termed 'pathological complete response', have been incorporated into neoadjuvant clinical trials. Pathologists have the expertise to deliver this essential information and they also understand the requirements and limitations of laboratory testing. Quality assurance of pathology-derived data builds confidence around trial-specific findings and is necessarily focused on the reproducibility of pathological data, including 'estimates of uncertainty of measurement', emphasising the importance of pathologist education, training, calibration and demonstration of satisfactory inter-observer agreement. There are also opportunities to validate objective image analysis tools alongside conventional histological assessments. The ever-expanding portfolio of clinical trials will demand more pathologist engagement to deliver the reliable evidence-base required for new treatments. We provide guidance for quality assurance of pathology scoring and reporting in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Robinson
- Centre for Oral Health ResearchNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Jacqueline James
- School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical SciencesCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Institute for Health Sciences, Queen's University BelfastBelfastUK
| | - Gareth Thomas
- Faculty of Medicine Cancer Sciences UnitSouthampton UniversitySouthamptonUK
| | - Nicholas West
- Pathology and Tumour BiologyLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Louise Jones
- Centre for Tumour BiologyBarts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryLondonUK
| | - Jessica Lee
- Strategy and InitiativesNational Cancer Research InstituteLondonUK
| | - Karin Oien
- Institute of Cancer Sciences – PathologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of PathologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | | | - Philip Sloan
- Department of Cellular PathologyNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS TrustNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Philip Elliot
- Centre for Tumour BiologyBarts Cancer Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and DentistryLondonUK
| | - Maggie Cheang
- Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials and Statistics UnitThe Institute of Cancer ResearchSurreyUK
| | | | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of Oxford, and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreOxfordUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Rees G, Salto‐Tellez M, Lee JL, Oien K, Verrill C, Freeman A, Mirabile I, West NP. Training and accreditation standards for pathologists undertaking clinical trial work. J Pathol Clin Res 2019; 5:100-107. [PMID: 30680942 PMCID: PMC6463859 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Clinical trials rely on multidisciplinary teams for successful delivery. Pathologists should be involved in clinical trial design from the outset to ensure that protocols are optimised to deliver maximum data collection and translational research opportunities. Clinical trials must be performed according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and the trial sponsor has an obligation to ensure that all of the personnel involved in the trial have undergone training relevant to their role. Pathologists who are involved in the delivery of clinical trials are often required to undergo formal GCP training and may additionally undergo Good Clinical Laboratory Practice training if they are involved in the laboratory analysis of trials samples. Further training can be provided via trial-specific investigator meetings, which may be either multidisciplinary or discipline-specific events. Pathologists should also ensure that they undertake External Quality Assurance schemes relevant to the area of diagnostic practice required in the trial. The level of engagement of pathologists in academia and clinical trials research has declined in the United Kingdom over recent years. This paper recommends the optimal training and accreditation for pathologists undertaking clinical trials activities with the aim of facilitating increased engagement. Clinical trials training should ideally be provided to all pathologists through centrally organised educational events, with additional training provided to pathologists in training through local postgraduate teaching. Pathologists in training should also be strongly encouraged to undertake GCP training. It is hoped that these recommendations will increase the number of pathologists who take part in clinical trials research in order to ensure a high level and standard of data collection and to maximise the translational research opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Rees
- Department of Cellular PathologyJohn Radcliffe HospitalOxfordUK
| | - Manuel Salto‐Tellez
- Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology LaboratoryCentre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queens UniversityBelfastUK
| | - Jessica L Lee
- Strategy and InitiativesNational Cancer Research InstituteLondonUK
| | - Karin Oien
- Institute of Cancer Sciences – PathologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of Oxford, and Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research CentreOxfordUK
| | - Alex Freeman
- Department of PathologyUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Ilaria Mirabile
- ECMC Programme Office, Experimental Cancer Medicine Centres (ECMCs) NetworkLondonUK
| | - Nicholas P West
- Pathology and Data AnalyticsLeeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of LeedsLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salto-Tellez M, Maxwell P, Hamilton P. Artificial intelligence-the third revolution in pathology. Histopathology 2019; 74:372-376. [PMID: 30270453 DOI: 10.1111/his.13760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Salto-Tellez
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
- Tissue Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
| | - Perry Maxwell
- Precision Medicine Centre of Excellence, Belfast, UK
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maxwell P, Salto-Tellez M. Training in molecular cytopathology testing. Cytopathology 2017; 29:5-9. [PMID: 29148178 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Training in molecular cytopathology testing is essential in developing and maintaining skills in modern molecular technologies as they are introduced to a universal health care system such as extant in the UK and elsewhere. We review the system in place in Northern Ireland (NI) for molecular testing of solid tumours, as an example to train staff of all grades, including pathologists, clinical scientists, biomedical scientists and equivalent technical grades. We describe training of pathologists as part of the NI Deanery medical curriculum, the NI training programme for scientists and laboratory rotation for Biomedical Scientists. Collectively, the aims of our training are two-fold: to provide a means by which individuals may extend their experience and skills; and to provide and maintain a skilled workforce for service delivery. Through training and competency, we introduce new technologies and tests in response to personalised medicine therapies with a competent workforce. We advocate modifying programmes to suit individual needs for skill development, with formalised courses in pre-analytical, analytical and postanalytical demands of modern molecular pathology. This is of particular relevance for cytopathology in small samples such those from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded cell blocks. We finally introduce how university courses can augment training and develop a skilled workforce to benefit the delivery of services to our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Maxwell
- Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - M Salto-Tellez
- Northern Ireland Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|