Autologous haematopoietic stem cell mobilisation in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients: a position statement from the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

How to manage poor mobilisers

Autologous hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation (ASCT) has been used for more than five decades to treat malignant and non-malignant diseases. Successful engraftment after high-dose chemotherapy relies on the ability to collect sufficient CD34 + hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs), typically from peripheral blood after mobilization. Commonly, either granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone as a single agent (i.e. steady-state mobilization) or G-CSF after chemotherapy is administered to collect adequate numbers of HPCs (minimum ≥2 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg for one ASCT; optimal up to 5 × 106 CD34 + cells/kg). However, a significant proportion of patients fail successful HPC mobilization, which is commonly defined as a CD34+ cell count below 10-15/µL after at least 4 days of 10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF alone, or after chemo-mobilization in combination with 5-10 µg/kg b.w. G-CSF. In these situations plerixafor, a chemokine receptor inhibitor (CXCR4) can be used to enhance HPC collection in patients with multiple myeloma and malignant lymphoma whose cells mobilize poorly. Risk factors for poor mobilization have been evaluated and several strategies (e.g. plerixafor to rescue the mobilization approach or pre-emptive use) have been suggested to optimize mobilization, especially in patients at risk. This manuscript discusses the risk factors of poor CD34+ mobilization and summarizes the current strategies to optimize mobilization and HPC collection.

Optimizing autologous stem cell collections for patients with multiple myeloma receiving G-CSF and Plerixafor: A single center project

BACKGROUND

Increasing indications for cellular therapy collections have stressed our healthcare system, with autologous collections having a longer than desired wait time until apheresis collection. This quality improvement initiative was undertaken to accommodate more patients within existing resources.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with multiple myeloma who underwent autologous peripheral blood stem cell collection from October 2022 to April 2023 were included. Demographic, mobilization, laboratory, and apheresis data were retrospectively collected from the medical record.

RESULTS

This cohort included 120 patients (49.2% male), with a median age of 60 years. All received G-CSF and 95% received pre-emptive Plerixafor approximately 18 hours pre-collection. Most (79%) had collection goals of at least 8 × 106/kg CD34 cells, with 63% over 70 years old having this high collection goal (despite 20 years of institutional data showing <1% over 70 years old have a second transplant). With collection efficiencies of 55.9%, 44% of patients achieved their collection goal in a single day apheresis collection. A platelet count <150 × 103/μL on the day of collection was a predictor for poor mobilization; among 27 patients with a low baseline platelet count, 17 did not achieve the collection goal and 2 failed to collect a transplantable dose.

CONCLUSIONS

With minor collection goal adjustments, 15% of all collection appointments could have been avoided over this 6-month period. Other strategies to accommodate more patients include mobilization modifications (Plerixafor timing or substituting a longer acting drug), utilizing platelet counts to predict mobilization, and modifying apheresis collection volumes or schedule templates.

Multiple Myeloma: The Role of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in the Era of Immunotherapy

Upfront high-dose therapy with melphalan (HDM) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has established itself as a core treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients in the past 30 years. Induction therapy, HDM-ASCT, and subsequent consolidation and maintenance therapy comprise the current fundamental framework for MM treatment. The introduction of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies such as daratumumab and isatuximab has changed the treatment paradigm for transplant-eligible NDMM patients in that quadruplets have become the new standard induction therapy. The treatment landscape of MM is undergoing a transformative shift with the introduction of potent new immunotherapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), which are currently used in the relapsed/refractory setting (RRMM) and are already being tested in the NDMM. This review will focus on the incorporation of immunotherapy in the treatment scenario of NDMM patients eligible for ASCT.

Efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of neutropenic fever in patients with multiple myeloma receiving high-dose cyclophosphamide for stem cell mobilization

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-Cy) (3 g/m2) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is a very effective regimen for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization. Unfortunately, it is associated with an increased risk of neutropenic fever (NF). We analyzed the effect of NF on PBSC apheresis results and the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of NF associated with HD-Cy plus G-CSF for PBSC mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). First, patients were divided into NF ( +) and NF ( -) groups according to whether they suffered from NF during mobilization. Second, we divided patients into an antibiotic prophylaxis group and a nonantibiotic prophylaxis group according to whether antibiotic prophylaxis was used during the mobilization period. Our study showed that NF( +) patients (n = 44) had lower CD34 + cell dose collection (median 2.60 versus 5.34 × 106/kg, P < 0.001) and slower neutrophil engraftment and platelet engraftment (median 11 versus 10 days, P = 0.002, and median 13 versus 11 days, P = 0.043, respectively) than NF( -) patients (n = 234). Of note, the nonantibiotic prophylaxis group patients (n = 30) had a 26.7% incidence of NF. In the patients receiving antibiotic prophylaxis (n = 227), the incidence was reduced to 9.3% (P = 0.01). The antibiotic prophylaxis patients had higher CD34 + cell collection (median 5.41 versus 2.27 × 106/kg, P < 0.001) and lower hospitalization cost of mobilization ($ median 3108.02 versus 3702.39, p = 0.012). Thus, our results demonstrate that NF is associated with lower CD34 + cell collection and that antibiotic prophylaxis can reduce the incidence of NF and improve stem cell mobilization and collection outcomes, which reduces the hospitalization cost of mobilization.

Efficacy and Safety of Single-dose Pegfilgrastim for CD34 + Cell Mobilization in Healthy Volunteers: A Phase 2 Study

BACKGROUND

Pegfilgrastim, a long-acting form of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, with a convenient single-injection dosage, is being investigated for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in healthy volunteers. However, data on the adequate dose of pegfilgrastim for PBSC mobilization are limited. This phase 2, single-arm study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim for PBSC mobilization in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

The study comprised 2 phases: pilot (steps 1-3, dose escalation, a single subcutaneous dose of 3.6, 7.2, and 10.8 mg pegfilgrastim, respectively) and evaluation (step 4, efficacy and safety assessments). The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects who achieved mobilization of ≥20 × 10 6 /L cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34 + ) cells.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects (6 each in steps 1 and 2 and 23 in step 4) were included. In the pilot phase, step 3 with a 10.8 mg dose was not conducted due to favorable outcomes in step 2 (desired CD34 + cell count), at 7.2 mg pegfilgrastim, which was identified as the optimal dose for the evaluation phase. In the evaluation phase, successful CD34 + mobilization was achieved in all 23 subjects. The mean peripheral blood CD34 + cells count peaked on day 5. Back pain, thrombocytopenia, transient elevations of alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase were the most common adverse events. All adverse events were mild, and none led to study discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

A single-dose pegfilgrastim successfully mobilized an optimal number of CD34 + cells and was well tolerated. Pegfilgrastim could be an alternative option for PBSC mobilization in healthy volunteers. The trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03993639).

Impact of plerixafor use in the mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation

Plerixafor (PLER), a reversible antagonist of the CXC chemokine receptor type 4, has been in clinical use for mobilization of blood grafts for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) for about 15 years. Initially PLER was investigated in placebo-controlled trials with the granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) filgrastim. It has also been used in combination with chemotherapy plus G-CSF in patients who had failed a previous mobilization attempt or appeared to mobilize poorly with current mobilization (preemptive use). This review summarizes what is known regarding addition of PLER to standard mobilization regimens. PLER increases mobilization of CD34+ cells, decreases the number of apheresis sessions needed to achieve collection targets and increases the proportion of patients who can proceed to AHCT. It appears also to increase the amount of various lymphocyte subsets in the grafts collected. In general, hematologic recovery after AHCT has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER, although slower platelet recovery has been observed in some studies of patients who mobilize poorly. In phase III studies, long-term outcome has been comparable to patients mobilized without PLER. This also appears to be the case in patients receiving plerixafor for poor or suboptimal mobilization of CD34+ cells. In practice, PLER is safe and has not been shown to increase tumor cell mobilization.

Stem Cells Collection and Mobilization in Adult Autologous/Allogeneic Transplantation: Critical Points and Future Challenges

Achieving successful hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) relies on two fundamental pillars: effective mobilization and efficient collection through apheresis to attain the optimal graft dose. These cornerstones pave the way for enhanced patient outcomes. The primary challenges encountered by the clinical unit and collection facility within a transplant program encompass augmenting mobilization efficiency to optimize the harvest of target cell populations, implementing robust monitoring and predictive strategies for mobilization, streamlining the apheresis procedure to minimize collection duration while ensuring adequate yield, prioritizing patient comfort by reducing the overall collection time, guaranteeing the quality and purity of stem cell products to optimize graft function and transplant success, and facilitating seamless coordination between diverse entities involved in the HSCT process. In this review, we aim to address key questions and provide insights into the critical aspects of mobilizing and collecting hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation purposes.

Investigating the effect of pre-transplant thrombocytopenia and anemia on the engraftment and long-term survival in multiple myeloma patients

BACKGROUND

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following high-dose melphalan is the standard treatment for Multiple Myeloma (MM). Despite new treatments, further investigation is needed to identify prognostic factors of ASCT. This study evaluated the impact of thrombocytopenia and anemia on the engraftment of MM patients after ASCT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study involved 123 MM patients who underwent ASCT with high-dose Melphalan. Successful engraftment is achieved when both platelets (Plt) and white blood cells (WBC) engraft successfully. We examined the statistically significant cut-offs for the prognostic factors on the admission day. Ultimately, the association of risk factors with the Plt and WBC engraftment and long-term survival were analyzed as the outcomes of interest.

RESULTS

Spearman's correlation coefficient between Plt and WBC engraftment was 0.396 (p < 0.001). The engraftment in the patients with Plt < 140,000/μL was 17.4% slower (p = 0.036) and the odds of long-term survival was 72% lower (p = 0.016) than in patients with higher Plt. Patients with Hb < 11 g/dL were 12.7% slower in engraftment. Age over 47 was a significant factor in slower engraftment (p = 0.036) which decelerated the engraftment by 15.2%.

CONCLUSION

Thrombocytopenia and anemia before transplantation are related to slower Plt/WBC engraftment and as prognostic factors might predict the long-term survival of MM patients following ASCT.

Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Counts of the Leukapheresis Product Determined Using Sysmex XN Analyzers Predict a Sufficient Number of CD34+ Stem Cells in a Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Harvest for Autologous Transplantation

Objective Several institutions outsource CD34+ cell counting of leukapheresis products, limiting rapid measurements, as results are obtained the next day. This problem is compounded with plerixafor use, a stem cell-mobilizing drug that increases leukapheresis efficiency but requires administration the day before leukapheresis. Use of this drug for a second leukapheresis procedure before the first-day leukapheresis CD34+ count results are confirmed causes unnecessary leukapheresis and expensive plerixafor administration. We investigated whether or not measuring hematopoietic progenitor cells in leukapheresis products (AP-HPCs) using a Sysmex XN-series analyzer could resolve this problem. Methods We retrospectively compared the absolute AP-HPC value per body weight with the CD34+ (AP-CD34+) count in 96 first-day leukapheresis product samples obtained between September 2013 and January 2021. Comparisons were also conducted according to regimen: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) monotherapy, chemotherapy plus G-CSF, or plerixafor mobilization. Results AP-CD34+ and AP-HPC counts correlated strongly (rs=0.846) overall and, in particular, under chemotherapy plus G-CSF (rs=0.92) but correlated mildly under G-CSF monotherapy (rs=0.655). AP-HPCs could not completely be dichotomized based on an AP-CD34+ threshold of 2×106/kg for any stimulation procedure. In most cases with AP-HPCs >6×106/kg, the AP-CD34+ count exceeded 2.0×106/kg, but in 5.7% of these cases, the AP-CD34+ count was <2.0×106/kg. A cut-off of AP-HPCs >4.843×106/kg yielded a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 96% for predicting AP-CD34+≥2×106/kg. Conclusion AP-HPCs can identify cases in which sufficient stem cells have been collected.

An evidence-based and risk-adapted GSF versus GSF plus plerixafor mobilization strategy to obtain a sufficient CD34+ cell yield in the harvest for autologous stem cell transplants

BACKGROUND

Plerixafor is a bicyclam molecule with the ability to reversibly bind to receptor CXCR-4 thus leading to an increased release of stem cells (SC) into the circulation. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of G-CSF plus plerixafor versus G-CSF alone mobilizing regimens on the basis of CD34+ cell yield and engraftment kinetics following hematopoietic SC transplants.

METHODS

The study incorporated 173 patients with plasma cell neoplasms (PCN), Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), undergoing mobilization and following autologous SC-transplant. For patients with mobilization failure and those predicted to be at risk of harvesting inadequate CD34+ yields (poor-responders), plerixafor was administered. Data was collected and compared in relation to the harvesting protocols used, cell quantification, cell-engraftment potential and overall clinical outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients received plerixafor (58.4 %) and the median CD34+increase was 312 %. Chemotherapy-mobilized PCN-patients required less plerixafor administration (p = 0.01), no difference was observed in lymphoma groups (p = 0.46). The median CD34+cell yield was 7.8 × 106/kg bm. Patients requiring plerixafor achieved lower, but still comparable cell yields. Total cell dose infused was in correlation with engraftment kinetics. Patients requiring plerixafor had delayed platelet engraftment (p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequately selected plerixafor administration reduces "mobilization-related-failure" rate and assure a high-level cell dose for SC transplants, with superior "therapeutic-potential" and safety profile. The mobilization strategy that incorporates "just-in-time" plerixafor administration, also leads to a reduction of hospitalization days and healthcare resource utilization. For definitive conclusions, further controlled/larger clinical trials concerning correlation of CD34+ cell count/yield, with hematopoietic reconstitution are required.

Prolonged infusion time of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a mobilization regimen may improve mobilization efficiency in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single center experience

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of two different infusion durations of cyclophosphamide (CTX) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-six consecutive NDMM patients receiving CTX plus G-CSF mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation during the period of September 2008 to May 2020 were selected for retrospective analysis. According to differences in prolonged infusion time of CTX, they were divided into a 24-h group (24-h continuous infusion) and a control group (4-6 h of infusion). Mobilization and safety of infusion were analyzed. Flow cytometry was used to detect the peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the factors influencing the number of CD34+ cells.

RESULTS

The mean CD34+ cell counts collected in 24-h and control groups were 6.78 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.59-11.69) and 4.48 (IQR 2.39-6.30) ×106/kg, respectively (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, the target number of CD34+ cells/kg (defined as ≥4 × 106/kg) was collected from 51 (75%) of cases in 24-h group vs. 45 (51%) in the control group (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified the independence of CTX infusion time as a factor influencing the target number of CD34+ cells/kg [odds ratio OR, 4.045; 95% CI: 1.630-10.038, p = 0.003]. The post-transplantation time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 (IQR 9-11) in 24-h group and 11 (IQR 10-12) in control group (p < 0.001). Finally, no statistical differences were identified between groups in terms of hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with NDMM, 24-h continuous infusion of CTX plus G-CSF contributes to improved mobilization efficiency and equivalent toxicity as a stem cell mobilization regimen.

Peripheral blood stem cells mobilization in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphomas: A single-center experience

CONTEXT

High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) is an established treatment for chemosensitive patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

AIMS

We present the results of using different salvage chemotherapy plus granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells in R/R lymphoma patients.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

For salvage chemotherapy, 93 patients received platinum-containing regimens, 4 patients received cytarabine-containing regimens, and 5 patients received other regimens. Patient distributions were HL (n = 35) and NHL (n = 67).

RESULTS

In 87.2% of patients, first mobilization trial was successful (>2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg). In 58.8% of patients, first apheresis season >5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collections was achieved. All 12.7% of patients were poorly mobilized at the first mobilization. There was no statistical difference between the previous chemotherapy numbers and failed mobilization (P > 0.05). Five patients who were poorly mobilized and 4 patients who were successfully mobilized underwent a previous radiotherapy (P < 0.05). Thirteen patients who were poorly mobilized in the first mobilization underwent a platinum-containing salvage regimen. At the time of the first mobilization, the average peripheral CD 34 counts in the successfully mobilized group were statistically higher than that in the poorly mobilized group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that peripheral CD 34 cell count in the peripheral blood on the first apheresis day was a significant factor for more stem cell mobilization, fewer apheresis sessions, less volume, and earlier neutrophil engraftment for patients with R/R lymphoma and eligible for AHSCT. The history of the previous radiotherapy was a significant factor for poor mobilization.

Stem cell mobilizating effect of heparin in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation

BACKGROUND

Adequate stem cell collection is essential for successful stem cell transplantation. Heparin enhances stem cell mobilization by competing with heparin sulfate proteoglycans. Heparin is also used as an anticoagulant before leukapheresis. Here, we evaluated the effects of heparin on stem cell mobilization in patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS

We evaluated patients who underwent ASCT. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received heparin plus citrate (heparinized patients) and those who received citrate only (nonheparinized patients) for anticoagulation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were also performed. The collection efficiency 2 (CE2) for CD34+ cells was calculated and compared between heparinized and nonheparinized patients.

RESULTS

This study included 1017 patients. There were 478 (47%) heparinized and 539 (53%) nonheparinized patients. The number of collected CD34+ cells was significantly higher in heparinized patients (P < .00001). The multivariate analyses showed that using heparin was an independent positive factor for collected CD34+ cells (adj-R2  = 0.744; F = 369.331, P < .00001). CE2 was significantly higher in heparinized patients than in nonheparinized patients (66.8% vs 52.1%; P < .00001). The rate of collecting at least 2 × 106 /kg CD34+ cells was 3.3 times higher for heparinized patients in poor mobilizers (P < .00001). Heparinized patients had significantly higher total nucleated and mononuclear cell counts (P < .00001 and <.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Heparin enhances stem cell collection and increases CE2. The use of heparin may reduce the need for other strategies to increase stem cell mobilization.

Fresh or frozen grafts for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: conceptual considerations and a survey on the practice during the COVID-19 pandemic from the EBMT Infectious Diseases Working Party (IDWP) and Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party (CTIWP)

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on medical practices, including the delivery of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). In response, transplant centers have made changes to their procedures, including an increased use of cryopreservation for allogeneic haematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) grafts. The use of cryopreserved grafts for allogeneic HCT has been reviewed and analysed in terms of potential benefits and drawbacks based on existing data on impact on cell subsets, hematological recovery, and clinical outcomes of approximately 2000 patients from different studies. A survey of European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation centers was also conducted to assess changes in practice during the pandemic and any unnecessary burdens on HPC donors. Before the pandemic, only 7.4% of transplant centers were routinely cryopreserving HPC products, but this percentage increased to 90% during the pandemic. The results of this review and survey suggest that cryopreservation of HPC grafts is a viable option for allogeneic HCT in certain situations, but further research is needed to determine long-term effects and ethical discussions are required to balance the needs of donors and patients when using frozen allografts.

Plerixafor in autologous stem cell transplantation: Does it affect engraftment kinetics?

Plerixafor increases stem cell mobilization by reversibly binding to the chemokine receptor CXCR4. In our study, we examined the results of mobilization with plerixafor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and revealed their effects on autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) engraftment kinetics. The study included all cases of ASCT performed in the Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit of xxx University between January 2014 and January 2022. It included a total of 300 patients. The total number of CD34 + cells collected was 7.44 ± 4.19 in patients with plerixafor and 9.53 ± 6.09 in patients without plerixafor. The mean neutrophil and platelet engraftment took longer in plerixafor-mobilized patients (neutrophil: 12 ± 4.1 vs. 10.2 ± 2.7 days; platelet: 21.6 ± 13.9 vs. 14.2 ± 5.9 days; p = 0.008 and p = 0.002). The number of febrile neutropenia attacks was significantly higher in plerixafor-mobilized patients (p = 0.04). In the chemo-mobilized patient subgroup, plerixafor-mobilized patients experienced more febrile neutropenia attacks (p = 0.04). The mean time to both neutrophil and platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. In the subgroup of patients with MM, the mean time to platelet engraftment was longer in patients mobilized with plerixafor. Plerixafor and its effect on engraftment kinetics should be evaluated with further studies in a larger population with survival analysis.

Pharmacoeconomic issues in stem cell mobilization

BACKGROUND

recently, stem cell mobilization has made dramatic progress, that ended up in an increasing number of aphereses at target for autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The aim of this research is investigating the cost-effectiveness of stem cell mobilization.

METHODS

a narrative review of the literature was carried out, searching for primary contributions written in English and published during 2000-2023 on cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of stem cell mobilization in patients entitled to ASCT. The PubMed database was searched with the following sets of keywords: cost-effectiveness AND apheresis AND myeloma (PubMed_1); cost-effectiveness AND stem cell mobilization (PubMed_2). Articles included in the analysis were assessed via two different checklists.

RESULTS

sixty-six entries were retrieved. Five out of 66 (PubMed_1: 4 out 17; PubMed_2: 1 out of 49), 4 CEAs and 1 cost-utility analysis (CUA) fit the research goal. Four out of 5 contributions proved to be in line with most of the items included in the two assessment grids. However, the most relevant missing features in some of the included contributions were: study perspective, healthcare resources valuation, and sensitivity analyses.

DISCUSSION

most of the articles included in this research show that chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective according to different standpoints. Future health economic research on this topic should establish local threshold values for incremental apheresis at target and explore the heterogeneity of CEA (and CUA) to determine oncohaematological diseases and patient categories for which chemotherapy-free stem cell mobilization is cost-effective in different healthcare systems, given local budget constraints.

Overview on novel strategies and current guidelines for hematopoietic stem cell mobilisation and collection

The success of the autologous stem cell transplantation is strictly related to an adequate hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and collection. The minimum threshold for a successful mobilization is currently defined as 2 × 106/kg CD34+ cells. However, the optimal stem cell mobilization strategy is still controversial. The availability of plerixafor, a selective and reversible CXCR4 inhibitor, has been associated with an higher use of chemo-free protocols by many centres. In the near future, it is conceivable that artificial intelligence may became more accurate and comprehensive, possibly guiding clinicians in choosing the optimal mobilisation treatment for the various patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Machine learning-based scoring models may be the basis for the development of "intelligent" mobilisation algorithms.

Leukapheresis for CAR-T cell production and therapy

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is an effective, individualized immunotherapy, and novel treatment for hematologic malignancies. Six commercial CAR-T cell products are currently approved for lymphatic malignancies and multiple myeloma. In addition, an increasing number of clinical centres produce CAR-T cells on-site, which enable the administration of CAR-T cells on site. The CAR-T cell products are either fresh or cryopreserved. Manufacturing CAR-T cells is a complicated process that begins with leukapheresis to obtain T cells from the patient's peripheral blood. An optimal leukapheresis product is crucial step for a successful CAR-T cell therapy; therefore, it is imperative to understand the factors that may affect the quality or T cells. The leukapheresis for CAR-T cell production is well tolerated and safe for both paediatric and adult patients and CAR-Τ cell therapy presents high clinical response rate in many studies. CAR-T cell therapy is under continuous improvement, and it has transformed into an almost standard procedure in clinical haematology and stem cell transplantation facilities that provide both autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantations. In patients suffering from advanced haematological malignancies, CAR-T cell therapy shows incredible antitumor efficacy. Even after a single infusion of autologous CD19-targeting CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL), long lasting remission is observed, and a fraction of the patients are being cured. Future novel constructs are being developed with better T cell persistence and better expansion. New next-generation CAR-T cells are currently designed to avoid toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity.

Steady-state versus chemotherapy-based hematopoietic cell mobilization after anti-CD38-based induction therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

The incorporation of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in induction regimens of newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been established as a new standard. However, the optimal strategy of stem cell mobilization in this context is not yet clear.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

From May 2020 till September 2022, we retrospectively reviewed patients receiving anti-CD38 mAb-based induction therapy followed by stem cell mobilization either in a steady-state protocol (SSM) using 10 μg/kg granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for 5 days or in a chemotherapy-based protocol (CM) using 1-4 g/m2 cyclophosphamide and G-CSF.

RESULTS

Overall, 85 patients (median age 61 years) were included in the analysis. In total, 90 mobilization attempts were performed, 42 with SSM and 48 with CM. There was no significant difference in the median concentration of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood (PB) prior to apheresis between SSM and CM (61/μL vs. 55.4/μL; p = .60). Cumulative CD34+ yields did not differ between the groups with median of 6.68 and 6.75 × 106 /kg body weight, respectively (p = .35). The target yield (≥4 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight) was reached in 88% (CM) and 86% (SSM), with a high proportion even after a single apheresis session (76% vs. 75%). Plerixafor was found to be more frequently used in SSM (52%) than in CM (23%; p < .01). A total of 83 patients underwent autologous transplantation and all were engrafted.

CONCLUSIONS

Stem cell collection in patients undergoing anti-CD38-based induction therapy is feasible with either CM or SSM, although SSM more frequently requires plerixafor.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety in the use of cytarabine for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in a reference hospital in northeastern Brazil

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) is widely used in the treatment of patients with hematological neoplasms. Since these cells circulate in small quantities in the periphery, the use of regimens that promote their mobilization is essential. In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of using intermediate doses of cytarabine (1.6 g/m²) + filgrastim (10 mcg/kg/day) in the mobilization of stem cells in 157 patients treated by the Unified Health System at the Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Service of the Hospital Real Português de Beneficência, in Recife, Pernambuco. The sample included patients with multiple myeloma (MM) (58.6 %), lymphomas (29.9 %), and other neoplasms (11.5 %). The target of 2.0 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg was achieved by 148 (94.3 %) patients, in most cases (84.1 %) in a single apheresis and the median number of cells collected was 9.5 × 10 6 CD34+ cells/kg. No episode of febrile neutropenia was observed, however, 79 patients (50.3 %) required platelet transfusion (no cases attributed to bleeding). The median engraftment time was 11 days. Given these results, we suggest that the use of intermediate doses of cytarabine, combined with filgrastim, is safe and effective in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs).

Impact of Clinical Parameters and Induction Regimens on Peripheral Blood Stem-Cell Mobilization and Collection in Multiple Myeloma Patients

Introduction

High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous blood stem-cell transplantation (ABSCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed eligible multiple myeloma (MM) patients. As a prerequisite, peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) must be mobilized and collected by leukapheresis (LP). Many factors can hamper PBSC mobilization/collection. Here, we provide a comprehensive multiparametric assessment of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters in a large cohort.

Methods

In total, 790 MM patients (471 [60%] male, 319 [40%] female) who underwent PBSC mobilization/collection during first-line treatment were included. Evaluated PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters included the prolongation of PBSC mobilization, plerixafor administration, number of LP sessions, and overall PBSC collection goal/result.

Results

741 (94%) patients received cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/dexamethasone (CAD) and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilization. Plerixafor was administered in 80 (10%) patients. 489 (62%) patients started LP without delay. 530 (67%) patients reached the PBSC collection goal at the first LP session. The mean overall PBSC collection result was 10.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.4) × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. In a multiparametric analysis, variables negatively associated with PBSC mobilization/collection outcomes were female gender, age >60 years, an advanced ISS stage, and local radiation pre-/during induction, but not remission status postinduction. Notably, the identified risk factors contributed differently to each PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameter. In this context, compared to all other induction regimens, lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies negatively affected only the number of LP sessions required to reach the collection goal, but no other PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters. In contrast, the probability of reaching a high collection goal of ≥6 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight was higher after lenalidomide-based induction compared to VCD/PAD or VAD - taking into account - that a higher G-SCF dosage was given in approximately one-third of patients receiving lenalidomide-based induction with/without antibodies.

Conclusion

Considering the identified risk factors in the clinical setting can contribute to optimized PBSC mobilization/collection. Moreover, our study demonstrates the necessity for a differentiated evaluation of PBSC mobilization/collection outcome parameters.

Mobilization and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Collection in Poor Mobilizing Patients with Lymphoma: Final Results of the German OPTIMOB Study

Introduction

Successful mobilization and collection of peripheral hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are necessary for lymphoma patients eligible for myeloablative chemotherapy with subsequent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Albeit G-CSF alone or combined with chemotherapy is well-established methods for HSC mobilization, up to 40% of the patients fail to mobilize (poor mobilizer, PM). Plerixafor (PLX) is commonly used in PM patients resulting in increased migration of HSCs into peripheral blood and thus improves the collection outcome.

Methods

The prospective, multicenter, open-label, non-interventional OPTIMOB study assessed mobilization and collection parameter of patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma to get deep insights in the treatment of those patients in clinical routine focusing on PM patients. PM was defined as follows: (1) no achievement of ≥20 CD34+ progenitor cells/µL before first apheresis, (2) PLX administration at any time point during the observational period, (3) reduction of the initially planned CD34+ progenitor cell yield as necessity due to failed mobilization or HSC collection, and (4) no performance of apheresis due to low CD34+ progenitor level. Primary objective of the study was to assess mobilization success by the proportion of PM patients achieving >2 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on the first day of apheresis. Here, the data of the lymphoma cohort are presented.

Results

Out of 238 patients with lymphoma documented in the study, 32% were classified as PM. 87% of them received PLX. Demographic data revealed no obvious differences between PM and good mobilizing (GM) patients. All patients were treated highly individualized prior to mobilization. Majority of all PM patients were able to undergo apheresis (95%) and reached their individual requested CD34+ progenitor cell target (72%). 57% of the PM patients achieved >2.0 × 106 CD34+ progenitor cells/kg body weight on day 1 of apheresis and nearby 70% of them underwent ASCT. Median time to engraftment was similar in PM and GM patients of the lymphoma cohort.

Conclusions

Majority of PM patients with lymphoma were successfully mobilized and underwent ASCT. Most of them received PLX during the study.

Mobilization Strategies in Myeloma Patients Intended for Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Background

Multiple myeloma is currently the leading indication for autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT). A prerequisite for AHCT is mobilization and collection of adequate blood graft to support high-dose therapy. Current mobilization strategies include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) alone or in combination with chemotherapy most commonly cyclophosphamide (CY). More recently, plerixafor has become into agenda especially in patients who mobilize poorly. In the selection of a mobilization method, several factors should be considered.

Summary

Preplanned collection target is important as G-CSF plus plerixafor is more effective in the mobilization of CD34+ cells than G-CSF alone. On the other hand, CY plus G-CSF is superior to G-CSF only mobilization. Previous therapy and age of the patients are important considerations as G-CSF alone may not be effective enough in patients with risk factors for poor mobilization. These factors include extensive lenalidomide exposure, irradiation to bone marrow-bearing sites, higher age, or a previous mobilization failure. Also, local preferences and experiences as well as the number of apheresis needed are important issues as well as cost-effectiveness considerations. Mobilization method used may have implication for cellular composition of collected grafts, which might have an impact on posttransplant events such as hematologic and immune recovery in addition to also potential long-term outcomes.

Key Message

Currently, G-CSF alone and preemptive plerixafor if needed might be considered as a standard mobilization strategy in MM patients intended for AHCT.

Flow Cytometric Characterization of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Subpopulations in Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Preparations after Cryopreservation

Introduction

Autologous stem cell transplantation is a successful routine procedure with only a small number of non-engraftment cases, although the time to hematopoietic recovery may vary considerably across patients. While CD34 has been the decisive marker for enumerating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) for more than 30 years, the impact of CD34-positive cellular subpopulations in autologous HSPC grafts on hematopoietic reconstitution remains unclear.

Methods

The two-color ISHAGE protocol represents the current gold standard for CD34+ cell enumeration but includes only the number of viable CD45+/CD34+ cells relative to the body weight of the recipient. We adapted a multicolor flow cytometry marker panel for advanced characterization of CD34 subpopulations in retained samples of autologous peripheral blood stem cell products (n = 49), which had been cryostored for a wide range from 4 to 15 years. The flow cytometric analysis included CD10, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD45RA, CD133, and viability staining with 7AAD. The findings were correlated with clinical engraftment data, including reconstitution of leukocytes, neutrophils, and platelets after transplantation (TPL).

Results

We demonstrated that the identification of autologous HSPC subpopulations by flow cytometry after cryopreservation is feasible. Regarding the distribution of HSPC subpopulations, a markedly different pattern was observed in comparison to previously published data obtained using fresh autologous material. Our data revealed the largest ratio of lympho-myeloid progenitors (LMPPs) after freezing and thawing, followed by multipotent progenitors and erythroid-myeloid progenitors. A high ratio of LMPPs, representing an immature stage of differentiation, correlated significantly with early neutrophilic granulocyte and leukocyte engraftment (p = 0.025 and p = 0.003). Conversely, a large ratio of differentiated cells correlated with late engraftment of neutrophilic granulocytes (p = 0.024). Overall, successful engraftment was documented for all patients.

Conclusion

We established an advanced flow cytometry panel to assess the differentiation ability of cryostored autologous peripheral blood stem cell grafts and correlated it with timely hematopoietic reconstitution. This approach represents a novel and comprehensive way to identify hematopoietic stem and progenitor subpopulations. It is a feasible way to indicate the engraftment capacity of stem cell products.

Higher efficacy of Etoposide + Cytarabine Plus Pegfilgrastim in poorly mobilizing Multiple Myeloma and lymphoma Patients

BACKGROUND AIMS

An optimal strategy for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in poorly mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma has not yet been determined.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of etoposide combined with cytarabine (etoposide 75 mg/m2, daily d1∼2; Ara-C 300 mg/m2, every 12 h d1∼2), plus pegfilgrastim (6 mg d6) in 32 patients with MM or lymphoma, among whom 53.1% were defined as "proven poor mobilizers."

RESULTS

This approach resulted in adequate mobilization (≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) in 93.8% of patients and optimal mobilization (≥5.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg) in 71.9% of patients. A total of 100% of patients with MM reached at least 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected, the amount required for double autologous stem cell transplant. In total, 88.2% of patients with lymphoma reached at least 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg collected, the amount required for a single autologous stem cell transplant. This was achieved with a single leukapheresis in 78.1% of cases. A median peak number of 42.0/μL circulating CD34+ cells and a median number of blood CD34+ cells counts in 6.7 × 106/L were collected among 30 successful mobilizers. Approximately 6.3% of patients required plerixafor rescue, which was successful. Nine (28.1%) of the 32 patients suffered grade 2∼3 infections, and 50% required platelet transfusions.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that chemo-mobilization with etoposide, Ara-C and pegfilgrastim in poorly mobilizing patients with MM or lymphoma is very effective and has acceptable toxicity.

[Multiple Myeloma Treatment Guidelines by the Portuguese Group of Multiple Myeloma]

The treatment of multiple myeloma has profoundly changed with the introduction of several innovative therapies. The optimization of therapeutic sequencing through the combined use of the various drugs developed in recent years and the attention given to the characteristics of patients have allowed the reduction of toxicities and increased survival and quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. These treatment recommendations from the Portuguese Multiple Myeloma Group offer guidance for first-line treatment and progression/relapse situations. These recommendations are given highlighting the data that justify each choice and referring to the respective levels of evidence that support these options. Whenever possible, the respective national regulatory framework is presented. These recommendations constitute an advance towards the best treatment of multiple myeloma in Portugal.

Effects of Extracorporeal Photopheresis on Quality of Life and the Course of Diseases in Patients With Mycosis Fungoides and Graft-Versus-Host Disease: A Single-Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to systematically analyze the influence of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) on the quality of life (LQ) and the course of the disease in patients with Mycosis Fungoides (MF), as well as with Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD).

METHODS

LQ was monitored retrospectively by using the dermatology life quality index (DLQI) and Skindex-29 test before ECP onset and after the last ECP. Disease parameters were assessed by objective criteria i.e. number of associated medical drugs taken, intervals between therapeutic cycles, gradual change of the disease, and eventual side-effects and complications of ECP therapy.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients were treated with ECP during 2008-19; 19 out of 51 died, and follow-up was not completed in 13 patients. Finally, treatment protocols of 671 ECP procedures were evaluated in 19 patients (10 MF; 9 GvHD). MF and GvHD subpopulations did not differ in the individual scores of LQ questions, either before the outset or after the last ECP. DLQI and Skindex-29 scores were ameliorated by the ECP therapy (p= 0.001 and p< 0.001, respectively) due to improvement of individual scores of feelings, daily/social activities (p< 0.05), and functionality (p≤ 0.05). The median interval between ECP cycles was extended from two to eight weeks (p= 0.001). Needs of GvHD patients for drugs being received for the underlying disease were reduced (p= 0.035). Two of the 10 MF patients worsened from stage IIA to IIIA. Severe or minor side effects leading to a therapy interruption were not recorded.

CONCLUSION

Patients with GvHD experienced a notable decrease in the administration of drugs for their underlying condition, and there were no instances of severe side effects that resulted in the discontinuation of treatment. ECP is safe and effective for the treatment of MF and GvHD.

Prediction of success of CD34+ collection for autotransplantation in children

INTRODUCTION

Intensive chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation is a therapeutic tool used in paediatric oncology. In adult patients, a peripheral blood CD34+ cell count superior to 20/μL enables an adequate collection of peripheral blood stem cells. There are no recommendations for children. This study aimed to determine whether the count of circulating CD34+ cells on the day before cytapheresis predicts successful collection in paediatric patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all paediatric patients who underwent apheresis for stem cell autotransplantation in the CHU of Rennes between 2010 and 2019. Successful apheresis was defined as a collection superior to 3×10⁶ CD34+/kg. "Success" and "failure" groups were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 122 apheresis procedures were performed in 105 patients. It was a successful procedure in 81% of patients and a failure in 19% of patients. A minimal cut-off of circulating CD34+ count superior to 13/μL on D-1 allowed us to predict a collection of at least 3×10⁶ CD34+/kg (PPV 94,8%, NPV 51,4%). For children aged<6 years, the association with leucocyte increase during the 5 days before the procedure improved the prediction of success.

DISCUSSION

The peripheral blood CD34+ cell count is a predictive factor for successful collection in paediatric patients. The minimal cut-off that allows an adequate collection of peripheral blood stem cells is inferior to the minimal cut-off in adult patients. Nevertheless, this minimal number of circulating CD34+ cells is insufficient to predict the success or failure of apheresis in patients younger than 6 years of age.

Benefits of plerixafor for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells prior to autologous transplantation: a dual-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AIMS

Before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), hematopoietic stem cells must be stimulated to move from the bone marrow to the peripheral blood for harvesting. Plerixafor, a C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 antagonist, is used to increase stem cell harvests. However, the effects of plerixafor on post-ASCT outcomes remain unclear.

METHODS

In a dual-center retrospective cohort study of 43 Japanese patients who received ASCT, the authors compared transplantation outcomes in patients who underwent stem cell mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with (n = 25) or without (n = 18) plerixafor.

RESULTS

The number of days to neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly shorter with plerixafor than without plerixafor, as assessed by univariate (neutrophil, P = 0.004, platelet, P = 0.002), subgroup, propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting analyses. Although the cumulative incidence of fever was comparable with or without plerixafor (P = 0.31), that of sepsis was significantly lower with plerixafor than without (P < 0.01). Thus, the present data indicate that plerixafor leads to earlier neutrophil and platelet engraftment and a reduction of infectious risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that plerixafor may be safe to use and that it reduces the risk of infection in patients with a low CD34+ cell count the day before apheresis.

Higher Age (≥60 Years) Increases the Risk for Adverse Events during Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) is a standard of care for patients with hemato-oncologic diseases. This procedure is highly regulated, and a quality assurance system needs to be in place. Deviations from defined processes and outcomes are reported as adverse events (AEs: any untoward medical occurrence temporally associated with an intervention that may or may not have a causal relationship), including adverse reactions (ARs: a response to a medicinal product which is noxious and unintended). Only a few reports on AEs cover the procedure of autoHSCT from collection until infusion. Our aim was to investigate the occurrence and severity of AEs in a large data set of patients who were treated by autoHSCT. In this retrospective, observational, single-center study on 449 adult patients during the years 2016-2019, AEs occurred in 19.6% of the patients. However, only 6.0% of patients had ARs, which is a low rate compared to the percentages (13.5-56.9%) found in other studies; 25.8% of the AEs were serious and 57.5% were potentially serious. Larger leukapheresis volumes, lower numbers of collected CD34+ cells and larger transplant volumes significantly correlated with the occurrence and number of AEs. Importantly, we found more AEs in patients >60 years (see graphical abstract). By preventing potentially serious AEs of quality and procedural issues, AEs could be reduced by 36.7%. Our results provide a broad view on AEs and point out steps and parameters for the potential optimization of the autoHSCT procedure, especially in elderly patients.

Stem Cell Mobilization for Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Daratumumab-Based Induction Therapy: A Real- World Experience

For patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDT-ASCT), hematopoietic stem cell mobilization can be affected by induction chemotherapy. In clinical trials, the addition of daratumumab (dara) to a triplet backbone lowered hematopoietic stem cell yield, necessitating the administration of plerixafor to achieve the desired yield for ASCT. Here we describe our experience of stem cell mobilization and collection after dara-based and non-dara-based induction regimens. This single-center retrospective analysis included patients with newly diagnosed MM who had received induction chemotherapy and were candidates for upfront HDT-ASCT. Based on the induction regimen used, patients were divided into 2 groups, RVd (lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone) and DRVd (RVd with the addition of dara). Based on our institutional practice, patients received pegylated growth colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on day -3 (at 0900 hours) in combination with plerixafor on day -1 (at 2300 hours) as a preemptive mobilization strategy. Patients continued apheresis for 1 to 3 days until the goal dose of hematopoietic stem cells was collected (2.5 × 10⁶ cells/kg for one ASCT and 5.0 × 10⁶ cells/kg for 2 ASCTs). Patients with a suboptimal stem cell yield on day 1 received additional doses of plerixafor with or without G-CSF. A total of 101 patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent mobilization between July 2021 and June 2022 were analyzed. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 36 to 80 years), and 51.5% of the cohort was female. Patients received a median of 5 (range, 2 to 12) cycles of induction chemotherapy, with a median of 4 (range, 2 to 12) cycles of DRVd and 6 (range, 3 to 12) cycles of RVd. The median number of CD34⁺ cells collected in the DRVd and the RVd groups was 6.54 × 10⁶/kg and 6.78 × 10⁶/kg, respectively. Target CD34⁺ stem cells were collected in a median of 1 day (range, 1 to 4 day) in each group. On average, more patients in the DRVd group compared to the RVd group received additional doses of plerixafor (51% versus 43%) and additional doses of GCSF (19% versus 14%) to achieve the target stem cell yield. There were no mobilization failures or grade 3+ mobilization-related adverse events reported in either group. The addition of daratumumab to the RVd induction regimen did not lead to any clinically significant differences in stem cell yield or number of collection days, provided that the patient received preemptive G-CSF and plerixafor. Patients with suboptimal collection on day 1 were able to collect adequate stem cells with additional doses of plerixafor with or without G-CSF.

Role of large unstained cells in predicting successful stem cell collection in autologous stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Sufficient stem cell collection is mandatory for Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Peripheral CD34+ stem CD34 + stem cell counting by flow cytometry is the gold standard method in both the predicting and timing of successful stem cell collection. Large unstained cells (LUC) are large peroxidase-negative cells that are displayed on certain automatic cell counters and present large lymphocytes, virocytes, blasts, abnormal cells and hematopoietic stem cells. In this study, we evaluated the role of LUC parameters in the timing and prediction of successful stem cell collection.

METHODS

Patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma, lymphoma and testis tumor who proceed to ASCT were included in this study. Preapheresis LUC parameters were analyzed with Siemens ADVIA® 2120i system., Kruskal Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, Spearman Rho and receiver-operator curve (ROC) tests were used for analyses.

RESULTS

Ninety patients were evaluated. Peripheral CD34 + cell count was positively correlated with both LUC count (p = 0014) and LUC percentage (p = 0,01). LUC percentage in peripheral blood was positively correlated with mobilized stem cell count in the yield (p = 0.003). We found a LUC count of > 0.485 × 10⁹/L as a cut-off value for detecting > 20 × 10⁶/L CD34 +cells in the peripheral blood with a sensitivity of 64.6% and specificity of 75%. We defined > 2.15% as a cut-off value for LUC percentage to collect > 5 × 10⁶/kg of stem cells with a sensitivity of 64% and specificity of 63%. Additionally, total nucleated cell (TNC) count was negatively correlated with LUC percentage (p = 0.014) and positively correlated with LUC count (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

LUC parameters are readily available, simple and cheap tools that can be useful in both timing of CD34 count by flow cytometry in peripheral blood and in the prediction of successful mobilization. LUCs can also be an indicator of graft composition.

Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib for PBSC mobilization in multiple myeloma

Although the incorporation of bortezomib into induction regimens has improved, response rates in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the role of bortezomib in the, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We assessed the, PBSC mobilization efficacy, safety, and disease response of intermediate-dose, cyclophosphamide and bortezomib in the PBSC mobilization. Twenty-one patients with, newly diagnosed MM were enrolled in a phase II, non-randomized study that used, bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2/day on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and intermediate-dose, cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2/day on days 2, 3) (Bor-ID-CY). The data from 15 patients, who received intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY) were used as a historical, control group. The total CD34 + cell yield of Bor-ID-CY and ID-CY groups were not, significantly different (median 6.3 ×106/kg vs. 6.5 ×106/kg, p = 0.19). All three patients, with mobilization failure of two groups had t(11;14). Six patients in Bor-ID-CY group, were upgraded from a status that was less than a very good partial response (VGPR), at the time of PBSC mobilization to a VGPR or better after PBSC mobilization, (p = 0.014). Four patients in Bor-ID-CY group developed sepsis. The time to, engraftment was similar in the two groups. The addition of bortezomib to ID-CY did not, impact the stem cell yield or quality.

The effect of preemptive use of plerixafor on stem cell mobilization in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of the preemptive use of plerixafor in patients with lymphoma and multiple myeloma which was administered as a preemptive single dose to the patients who were determined to have a CD34+ cell count of

Day -1 CD34+ Cells and Platelet Count Predict the Number of Apheresis in Poor-Mobilizer Patients Rescued by Plerixafor

Plerixafor is widely used as up-front treatment with G-CSF to enhance peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell output in patients failing previous mobilizations. Less frequently, plerixafor is used to rescue an unsatisfactory mobilization following chemotherapy (CT) and G-CSF. This study investigates if pre-collection factors affect the CD34+ cell harvest in chemotherapy and G-CSF mobilizations rescued by plerixafor. Clinical and hematological data relative to patients, mobilization, and apheresis products were retrospectively examined. The outcome was completing a target cell dose ≥ 2 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg at first apheresis. The effect exerted on the outcome by patient- and disease-related factors was investigated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. The analysis included data from 42 patients affected by hematological (39 patients) and non-hematological malignancies (three patients). Twenty-nine patients (69%) attained the target cell dose at first apheresis. Twelve out of the remaining 13 patients received an additional plerixafor administration, and all accomplished the transplant dose at a second apheresis procedure. Day -1 CD34+ PB count (OR1.46, 95% CI 1.1-1.9, p = 0.008) and platelet count (OR1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.0, p = 0.033) predicted the achievement of the target dose at first apheresis, independently of pre-mobilization CT, radiation therapy, and disease status at mobilization. At ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off value predicting the successful collection at first apheresis was 7.5/µL for Day -1 CD34+ cell count (AUC 0.830, 0.69 sensitivity, and 0.92 specificity) and 75 × 10⁹/L for Day -1 platelet count (AUC = 0.736, 0.65 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity). In conclusion, on-demand plerixafor rescue allows a successful stem cell collection, irrespectively of disease type and status, prior CT lines, and radiation exposure. Pre-apheresis CD34+ cells and platelet count predict the need for one or two aphereses.

Economic evaluation of plerixafor addition in the mobilization and leukapheresis of hematopoietic stem cells for autologous transplantation: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Although plerixafor in association with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) can improve mobilization and collection of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) by leukapheresis, cost may limit its clinical application. The present study systematically reviews economic evaluations of plerixafor plus G-CSF usage compared to G-CSF alone and compares different strategies of plerixafor utilization in multiple myeloma and lymphoma patients eligible for autologous HSC transplantation.

AREAS COVERED

Relevant economic evaluations, partial or complete, were searched on PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for a period ending 30 June 2021. This systematic review was reported following the PRISMA Statement. Six economic evaluations were included, considering the use of upfront or just-in-time plerixafor compared to G-CSF alone or other plerixafor strategies. Most comparisons showed both increased cost and health benefits with the addition of plerixafor. Most analyses favored just-in-time plerixafor compared to upfront plerixafor, with a probable preference for broader cutoffs for just-in-time plerixafor initiation.

EXPERT OPINION

Plerixafor is a potentially cost-effective technology in the mobilization of HSC in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphomas eligible for autologous HSC transplantation. There is a decreased number of leukapheresis sessions and remobilizations and a higher yield of CD34+ cells.

Efficient expansion of rare human circulating hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells in steady-state blood using a polypeptide-forming 3D culture

Although widely applied in treating hematopoietic malignancies, transplantation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs) is impeded by HSPC shortage. Whether circulating HSPCs (cHSPCs) in steady-state blood could be used as an alternative source remains largely elusive. Here we develop a three-dimensional culture system (3DCS) including arginine, glycine, aspartate, and a series of factors. Fourteen-day culture of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) in 3DCS led to 125- and 70-fold increase of the frequency and number of CD34⁺ cells. Further, 3DCS-expanded cHSPCs exhibited the similar reconstitution rate compared to CD34⁺ HSPCs in bone marrow. Mechanistically, 3DCS fabricated an immunomodulatory niche, secreting cytokines as TNF to support cHSPC survival and proliferation. Finally, 3DCS could also promote the expansion of cHSPCs in patients who failed in HSPC mobilization. Our 3DCS successfully expands rare cHSPCs, providing an alternative source for the HSPC therapy, particularly for the patients/donors who have failed in HSPC mobilization.

Impact of Cryopreservation of Peripheral Blood Stem Cells (PBSC) in Transplantation from Matched Unrelated Donor (MUD)

Background: Cryopreservation of PBSC for allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) was implemented due to the current Coronavirus 2019 pandemic. The impact of match unrelated donor (MUD) graft freezing on the outcome of allo-HSCT in terms of hematological recovery, graft versus host disease (GVHD), and survival are still controversial. Methods: In this study, we compared graft composition, clinical characteristics, and outcome of 31 allo-HSCT from MUD cryopreserved PBSC (Cryo Group) with 23 matched-pair allo-HSCT from fresh MUD PBSC (Fresh Group) performed in our center between January 2020 and July 2021. Results: No significant differences were recognized in clinical characteristics of patients, donors, and transplants between the Cryo and Fresh groups except for a better prognostic comorbidity index (HCT-CI) of the Cryo group. In the Cryo Group, the median time from apheresis to cryopreservation was 46.0 h (range 23.8−53.5), while the median time from cells collection and reinfusion was 13.9 days (range 5.8−28.1). In the Fresh Group, median time from apheresis to reinfusion was 35.6 h (range 21.4−51.2). The number of viable (7-AAD negative) CD34+ cells per kg patient infused was significantly lower in the Cryo Group (5.2 ± 1.9 × 106/kg vs. 7.0 ± 1.3 × 106/kg; p < 0.001). Indeed, there was a 36% (11−70) median loss of viable CD34+/kg cells after freezing. All patients engrafted: median time to neutrophil engraftment (>0.5 × 109/L) was 13.5 days (range 12−15) for Cryo Group and 14 days (range 13−16) days for Fresh Group (p = 0.522), while the median time to platelet engraftment (>20 × 109/L) was, respectively, 14 (range 12−18) and 15 (range 12−17) days (p = 0.904). The incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute GVHD was similar in the two groups (56.5% Cryo Group vs. 60.0% Fresh Group; p = 0.832) and no differences in terms of OS (p = 0.090), PFS (p = 0.200) and TRM (p = 0.970) were observed between the Cryo and Fresh groups. Conclusions: In our series, no differences between the Cryo and Fresh groups were found in engraftment, grade ≥ 2 acute GVHD incidence, OS, PFS, and TRM despite a lower CD34+ infused dose in the Cryo Group. Frozen PBSCs could be considered a safe option also for allo-HSCT from MUD but a higher amount of PBSC should be collected to warrant an adequate viable CD34+ post-thawing.

Treosulfan plus fludarabine versus TEAM as conditioning treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation for B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) has been proven to be feasible and efficient in several types of malignancies before allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Given its favorable reduced toxicity profile, we introduced Treo/Flu as conditioning before autologous HSCT (auto-HSCT) in patients with B-cell Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Treo/Flu in comparison to TEAM. Fifty-seven patients with NHL received auto-HSCT after conditioning with either Treo/Flu (n = 22) or TEAM (n = 35). All patients achieved sustained engraftment. PFS, EFS and OS were not significant in both groups. Of note is that patients in the Treo/Flu group were less dependent on thrombocyte transfusions (p = 0.0082), significantly older (in median 11 years, p < 0.0001) and suffered less frequently from infectious complications (p = 0.0105), mucositis and stomatitis (p < 0.0001). This study is the first to present efficacy, feasibility, and safety of conditioning with Treo/Flu preceding auto-HSCT in patients with NHL. Since it demonstrated a lack of significant difference in comparison to TEAM conditioning it might be a valuable alternative especially in elderly patients with B-cell NHL and comorbidities. Further evaluation by prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Comparison of cryoprotectants in hematopoietic cell infusion-related adverse events

BACKGROUND

The standard cryoprotectant for human cellular products is dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), which is associated with hematopoietic cell infusion-related adverse events (HCI-AEs) in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation including peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation (PBSCT). DMSO is often used with hydroxyethyl starch (HES), which reduces DMSO concentration while maintaining the postthaw cell recovery. The cryoprotectant medium CP-1 (Kyokuto Pharmaceutical Industrial) is widely used in Japan. After mixture of a product with CP-1, DMSO and HES concentrations are 5% and 6%, respectively. However, the safety profile of CP-1 in association with HCI-AEs has not been investigated.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To compare CP-1 with other cryoprotectants, we conducted a subgroup analysis of PBSCT recipients in a prospective surveillance study for HCI-AEs. Moreover, we validated the toxicity of CP-1 in 90 rats following various dose administration.

RESULTS

The PBSC products cryopreserved with CP-1 (CP-1 group) and those with other cryoprotectants, mainly 10% DMSO (non-CP-1 group), were infused into 418 and 58 recipients, respectively. The rate of ≥grade 2 HCI-AEs was higher in the CP-1 group, but that of overall or ≥grade 3 HCI-AEs was not significantly different, compared to the non-CP-1 group. Similarly, after propensity score matching, ≥grade 2 HCI-AEs were more frequent in the CP-1 group, but the ≥grade 3 HCI-AE rate did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant toxicity was detected regardless of the CP-1 dose in the 90 rats.

CONCLUSIONS

Infusion of a CP-1-containing PBSC product is feasible with the respect of HCI-AEs.

High Efficacy of Stem Cell Mobilization With Etoposide+Cytarabine Plus G-CSF in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Background

Efficient mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells plays a vital role in successful autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), especially in cases with high-risk cytogenetic recommended for tandem ASCT. However, the optimal mobilization strategy remains a matter of debate in the era of lenalidomide. The combination of etoposide with Cytarabine plus G-CSF as a novel mobilization regimen in MM has not been reported previously.

Methods

This research retrospectively studied mobilization efficacy and safety using etoposide combined with Cytarabine (etoposide 50–100 mg/m², qd d1–3; AraC 0.5 g/m², q12h d1~3) plus G-CSF (5 µg/kg/day, from d5 until the day of apheresis) in 128 patients with MM. 70(54.7%) patients received lenalidomide-based induction regimens treatment

Results

A median of 27.75×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg was collected in the first apheresis, and 28.23×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg were collected overall. Of the 128 patients, all achieved adequate collection (≥2×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg), 121(94.5%) achieved optimal collection for single ASCT (≥5×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg), and 114(89.1%) harvested optimal collection for tandem ASCT (≥10×10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg). In particular, the target yield of optimal collection for tandem ASCT was reached in 82.8% (106/128) by a single apheresis procedure. 14 patients obtained deeper response post mobilization. In multivariate analysis, cycles of prior chemotherapy independently affected the optimal achievement of CD34+ cells (p=0.004, OR 0.695, 95% CI 0.544~0.888). Previous lenalidomide exposure did not significantly impair CD34+ cells collection. Although 68% episodes of antibiotic usage were observed, no severe infection or treatment-related mortality occurred.

Conclusion

Stem cell mobilization with Etoposide + Cytarabine plus G-CSF was highly efficient and safe in patients with MM, which could be considered in high-risk MM patients who were referred for tandem ASCT.

Development of a quantitative prediction model for peripheral blood stem cell collection yield in the plerixafor era

BACKGROUND AIMS

Predicting autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection yield before leukapheresis is important for optimizing PBSC mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for treating hematological malignancies. Although guidelines for plerixafor usage based on peripheral blood CD34⁺ (PB-CD34⁺) cell count are available, their predictive performance in the real world remains unclear.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 55 mobilization procedures for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma and developed a novel quantitative prediction model for CD34⁺ cell collection yield that incorporated four clinical parameters available the day before leukapheresis; namely, PB-CD34⁺ cell count the day before apheresis (day -1 PB-CD34⁺), number of prior chemotherapy regimens, disease status at apheresis and mobilization protocol.

RESULTS

The effects of PB-CD34⁺ cell counts on CD34⁺ cell collection yield varied widely per patient characteristics, and plerixafor usage was recommended in patients with poorly controlled disease or those with a history of heavy pre-treatments even with abundant day -1 PB-CD34⁺ cell count. This model suggested a more proactive use of plerixafor than that recommended by the guidelines for patients with poor pre-collection condition or those with a higher target number of CD34⁺ cells. Further, the authors analyzed the clinical outcomes of ASCT and found that plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization did not affect short- or long-term outcomes after ASCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Although external validations are necessary, the results can be beneficial for establishing more effective and safer mobilization strategies.

Addition of plerixafor for mobilization of stem cells with bortezomib is feasible in dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma

Plerixafor and bortezomib have recently been used in autologous stem cell collection to increase the amount of stem cells collected. However, no reports have described the combined use of plerixafor and bortezomib in cases of dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma. The dialysis-dependent multiple myeloma patient in the present study had a small amount of CD34-positive cells with plerixafor and filgrastim, and also with bortezomib and cyclophosphamide. However, by adding plerixafor to bortezomib and cyclophosphamide, collected CD34-positive cells were increased six-fold compared to the previous day. These findings suggest that the combination of plerixafor and bortezomib may be effective in those patients.

The association of mobilising regimen on immune reconstitution and survival in myeloma patients treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction followed by a melphalan autograft

G-CSF only mobilisation has been shown to enhance immune reconstitution early post-transplant, but its impact on survival remains uncertain. We undertook a retrospective review of 12 transplant centres to examine overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) following melphalan autograft according to mobilisation method (G-CSF only vs. G-CSF and cyclophosphamide [CY]) in myeloma patients uniformly treated with bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone induction. Six centres had a policy to use G-CSF alone and six to use G-CSF + CY. Patients failing G-CSF only mobilisation were excluded. 601 patients were included: 328: G-CSF + CY, 273: G-CSF only. Mobilisation arms were comparable in terms of age, Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) groups and post-transplant maintenance therapy. G-CSF + CY mobilisation generated higher median CD34 + yields (8.6 vs. 5.5 × 10⁶/kg, p < 0.001). G-CSF only mobilisation was associated with a significantly higher lymphocyte count at day 15 post-infusion (p < 0.001). G-CSF only mobilisation was associated with significantly improved OS (aHR = 0.60, 95%CI 0.39-0.92, p = 0.018) and TTNT (aHR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.60-0.97, p = 0.027), when adjusting for R-ISS, disease-response pre-transplant, age and post-transplant maintenance therapy. This survival benefit may reflect selection bias in excluding patients with unsuccessful G-CSF only mobilisation or may be due to enhanced autograft immune cell content and improved early immune reconstitution.

Multiple Myeloma: Risk Adapted Use of Plerixafor for Stem Cell Mobilization Prior to Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation is Effective and Cost Efficient

BACKGROUND

We used plerixafor in 'a risk adapted approach' for stem cell mobilization for multiple myeloma (MM) patients prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January, 2017 and December, 2019 105 consecutive patients of MM were recruited (Study Cohort). Patients received inj G-CSF 10 µg/kg in 2 divided doses for 5 days. Day 4 peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ count was used as a guide; if count was < 20 cells/µl, patients received plerixafor. For those with ≥ 20 cells/µl apheresis was commenced on day 5. We compared their outcome with 156 MM patients transplanted between 2012 and 2016 with G-CSF mobilized PB stem cells (Control Cohort). Primary end point was to collect ≥2.0  ×  10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg (minimal harvest). Secondary end points were: no of apheresis sessions, percentage of patients with optimal stem cell harvest (≥4.0  ×  10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg) and cost analysis. An intent to treat analysis was done.

RESULT

96.2% of patients achieved ≥ 2.0  ×  10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg in the study cohort vs. 87.2% in the control cohort, P < .01. Mean apheresis sessions were 1.5 vs. 1.7 respectively, P < .014 . Optimal stem cell harvest was 29.5% vs. 16%,P = .23. Days for neutrophil engraftment (P < 0.025) and for IV antibiotics (P < .0017) were favorable for the study cohort. Incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $ 15.80/- and $ 10.56/- per 1% increase to achieve a minimal and optimal harvest.

CONCLUSION

Plerixafor in this risk adapted strategy resulted in successful mobilization, decreased time to engraftment and was cost effective.

A Review of Advances in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and the Potential Role of Notch2 Blockade

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation can be a potential cure for hematological malignancies and some nonhematologic diseases. Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) collected from peripheral blood after mobilization are the primary source to provide HSC transplantation. In most of the cases, mobilization by the cytokine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with chemotherapy, and in some settings, with the CXC chemokine receptor type 4 antagonist plerixafor, can achieve high yield of hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs). However, adequate mobilization is not always successful in a significant portion of donors. Research is going on to find new agents or strategies to increase HSC mobilization. Here, we briefly review the history of HSC transplantation, current mobilization regimens, some of the novel agents that are under investigation for clinical practice, and our recent findings from animal studies regarding Notch and ligand interaction as potential targets for HSPC mobilization.