1
|
Heuer A, Löwhagen S, Uhlig S, Hetjens S, Büttner S, Pflästerer B, Diehlmann A, Klein S, Klüter H, Bieback K, Wuchter P. Flow Cytometric Characterization of Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cell Subpopulations in Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Preparations after Cryopreservation. Transfus Med Hemother 2023; 50:417-427. [PMID: 37899990 PMCID: PMC10601604 DOI: 10.1159/000533624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Autologous stem cell transplantation is a successful routine procedure with only a small number of non-engraftment cases, although the time to hematopoietic recovery may vary considerably across patients. While CD34 has been the decisive marker for enumerating hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) for more than 30 years, the impact of CD34-positive cellular subpopulations in autologous HSPC grafts on hematopoietic reconstitution remains unclear. Methods The two-color ISHAGE protocol represents the current gold standard for CD34+ cell enumeration but includes only the number of viable CD45+/CD34+ cells relative to the body weight of the recipient. We adapted a multicolor flow cytometry marker panel for advanced characterization of CD34 subpopulations in retained samples of autologous peripheral blood stem cell products (n = 49), which had been cryostored for a wide range from 4 to 15 years. The flow cytometric analysis included CD10, CD34, CD38, CD45, CD45RA, CD133, and viability staining with 7AAD. The findings were correlated with clinical engraftment data, including reconstitution of leukocytes, neutrophils, and platelets after transplantation (TPL). Results We demonstrated that the identification of autologous HSPC subpopulations by flow cytometry after cryopreservation is feasible. Regarding the distribution of HSPC subpopulations, a markedly different pattern was observed in comparison to previously published data obtained using fresh autologous material. Our data revealed the largest ratio of lympho-myeloid progenitors (LMPPs) after freezing and thawing, followed by multipotent progenitors and erythroid-myeloid progenitors. A high ratio of LMPPs, representing an immature stage of differentiation, correlated significantly with early neutrophilic granulocyte and leukocyte engraftment (p = 0.025 and p = 0.003). Conversely, a large ratio of differentiated cells correlated with late engraftment of neutrophilic granulocytes (p = 0.024). Overall, successful engraftment was documented for all patients. Conclusion We established an advanced flow cytometry panel to assess the differentiation ability of cryostored autologous peripheral blood stem cell grafts and correlated it with timely hematopoietic reconstitution. This approach represents a novel and comprehensive way to identify hematopoietic stem and progenitor subpopulations. It is a feasible way to indicate the engraftment capacity of stem cell products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabel Heuer
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svea Löwhagen
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefanie Uhlig
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- FlowCore, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Svetlana Hetjens
- Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sylvia Büttner
- Medical Statistics, Biomathematics and Information Processing, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Britta Pflästerer
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anke Diehlmann
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefan Klein
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Harald Klüter
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Karen Bieback
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- FlowCore, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Patrick Wuchter
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Immunology, German Red Cross Blood Service Baden-Württemberg – Hessen, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Worel N, Fritsch G, Agis H, Böhm A, Engelich G, Leitner GC, Geissler K, Gleixner K, Kalhs P, Buxhofer-Ausch V, Keil F, Kopetzky G, Mayr V, Rabitsch W, Reisner R, Rosskopf K, Ruckser R, Zoghlami C, Zojer N, Greinix HT. Plerixafor as preemptive strategy results in high success rates in autologous stem cell mobilization failure. J Clin Apher 2016; 32:224-234. [PMID: 27578390 DOI: 10.1002/jca.21496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2016] [Revised: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Plerixafor in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) is approved for autologous stem cell mobilization in poor mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma or malignant lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of plerixafor in an immediate rescue approach, administrated subsequently to G-CSF alone or chemotherapy and G-CSF in patients at risk for mobilization failure. Eighty-five patients mobilized with G-CSF alone or chemotherapy were included. Primary endpoint was the efficacy of the immediate rescue approach of plerixafor to achieve ≥2.0 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a single or ≥5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg for a double transplantation and potential differences between G-CSF and chemotherapy-based mobilization. Secondary objectives included comparison of stem cell graft composition including CD34+ cell and lymphocyte subsets with regard to the mobilization regimen applied. No significant adverse events were recorded. A median 3.9-fold increase in CD34+ cells following plerixafor was observed, resulting in 97% patients achieving at least ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg. Significantly more differentiated granulocyte and monocyte forming myeloid progenitors were collected after chemomobilization whereas more CD19+ and natural killer cells were collected after G-CSF. Fifty-two patients underwent transplantation showing rapid and durable engraftment, irrespectively of the stem cell mobilization regimen used. The addition of plerixafor in an immediate rescue model is efficient and safe after both, G-CSF and chemomobilization and results in extremely high success rates. Whether the differences in graft composition have a clinical impact on engraftment kinetics, immunologic recovery, and graft durability have to be analysed in larger prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Worel
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerhard Fritsch
- Children?s Cancer Research Institute (CCRI), St. Anna Kinderkrebsforschung, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hermine Agis
- Medical Department I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alexandra Böhm
- First Medical Department, Elisabethinen Hospital, Linz, Austria
| | - Georg Engelich
- First Medical Department, Hospital Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Gerda C Leitner
- Department of Blood Group Serology and Transfusion Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klaus Geissler
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karoline Gleixner
- Medical Department I, Division of Haematology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Peter Kalhs
- Medical Department I, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Felix Keil
- Third Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Viktor Mayr
- Medical Department II, Hospital Krems, Austria
| | - Werner Rabitsch
- Medical Department I, Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Regina Reisner
- Third Medical Department, Hanusch Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Konrad Rosskopf
- Department of Blood Group Serology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Reinhard Ruckser
- Medical Department II, Division of Oncology, Donauhospital Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Zoghlami
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
| | - Niklas Zojer
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Wilhelminen Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|